header logo image


Page 43«..1020..42434445..50..»

Archive for the ‘Immune System’ Category

8 things that can compromise your immune system during the festive season – IOL

Sunday, December 8th, 2019

Health & Wellness/5 December 2019, 09:00am/IOL Supplied

The countdown to the end-of-year summer break has begun, but its also the season when many South Africans fall prey to tummy bugs, unexpected colds, migraines and other nasties which can spoil the holiday fun.

Alisha Mackintosh, Allergy and Immunity Portfolio Manager at Pharma Dynamics says its likely that certain changes in our routine may be to blame.

During the holidays we travel more, eat out-, shop- and party more. We stay up late and are perhaps a little more relaxed about hygiene, which can weaken our immune system and make us more susceptible to viruses and bacteria.

Macintosh says we should be wary of:

Eating too much sugar

Its the time of year when many give in to festive season temptations that are often laden with sugar without realising that this weakens white blood cells. If youre consuming sweet things throughout the day it means that your immune system may continuously be operating at a distinct disadvantage.

Drinking too much alcohol

The holidays are synonymous with parties and alcohol, but too much booze can inhibit the bodys ability to fight infection, so rather drink in moderation.

Staying up late

Partying or catching up on Netflix till the wee hours of the night and getting up later in the mornings can trigger migraines. Sticking to healthy sleep habits and getting eight hours of sleep can reduce the frequency of headaches by 29% and the intensity by 40%.

Holiday shopping

When on holiday, we tend to shop more, which means were handling and drawing cash more than usual. Money carry about 3 000 different types of bacteria that can lead to all sorts of illnesses. Always wipe shopping trolleys and surfaces with sanitising wipes before touching it or wash your hands afterwards.

Traveling by plane

Some studies have found that flying heightens our risk of catching a cold by 80%. Sitting in close quarters for a long flight might be partially to blame, but we typically push ourselves to meet all the last-minute deadlines before going on holiday, which puts a strain on our immune system. Consider boosting your immunity before a plane flight by getting enough rest, eating healthily and managing stress.

Taking an immune-boosting supplement is also recommended. Look out for supplements that contain vitamin C, zinc and Echinacea, such as Efferflu C to keep the common cold at bay.

Dirty air conditioners

As the mercury rises during the holidays, the more well be making use of air conditioning units in the car and house to cool down, but if it hasnt been cleaned regularly, it could be harbouring harmful bacteria that can affect those with compromised immune systems. Its recommended that air conditioning systems get debugged at least every two years.

Too many holiday demands

Securing the house before going away on holiday, hosting and accommodating family, getting all the shopping done etc could all increase your stress load, which doesnt do your immune system any good. Be aware of these stressors and take steps to better manage the demands that are placed on you to make the holiday season less challenging.

Crowds

Holidays mean more crowds no matter where you go and airborne germs thrive in crowded environments, which heightens ones risk of getting sick. When finding yourself in a high-risk environment, try Nexa Travelshied a natural nasal spray which coats the nasal membrane, trapping viruses and other airborne allergens to keep you healthy.

Other common illnesses that holidaymakers often pick up include fever, diarrhoea, respiratory infections, giardiasis (infection of the small intestine), skin or soft tissue infections. Proper hygiene practices are of paramount importance and never consume food or water from places where the risk of contamination is high.

Apart from plasters and Burnshield, your holiday first-aid kit should always include sunscreen, mosquito repellent, antibacterial cream, antihistamines, eye drops, pain medication and medicine to help with stomach cramps and nausea as these ailments are likely to surface during the holidays, she advises.

Originally posted here:
8 things that can compromise your immune system during the festive season - IOL

Read More...

Treating Cancer 5 Types of Immunotherapy – Technology Networks

Sunday, December 8th, 2019

ListDec 03, 2019| by Laura Elizabeth Lansdowne, Senior Science Writer for Technology Networks

Numerous treatments are available to patients with cancer.Several factorsincluding; the type and stage of a patients cancer, their general health, and preferences impact treatment options.Some available treatments harness theimmune system the bodys natural line of defense against infection and disease to fight cancer.

This list explores the different types of immunotherapy, how each type works, and takes a closer look at some examples of approved immunotherapies.

Types of adoptive cell therapyTumor-infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) Therapy (Unmodified Cells)Naturally occurring T cells that have already infiltrated a patients tumorare harvested from resected tumor material, activated and then expandedex vivo. The activated T cells are then re-infused into the patient. There is now a greater number of activated cells available, enhancing the bodys anti-tumor immune response.Engineered T-cell Receptor (TCR) Therapy (Modified Cells)In some cases, a patients T cells either cannot recognize a tumororare unable to activate and expand sufficiently, meaning they are incapable of mounting a response against the cancer cells. Engineered TCR therapy can be used to combat this problem. This approachinvolves taking T cells from a cancer patient, modifying themso that they are armed with a new T cell receptor that allows them to target specific tumor antigens. Bothsurfaceandintracellular proteins can be displayedas antigens attached to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on the surface of a cancer cell.

Whilst T cells have the ability to recognize many different antigens, distinct types of T cell can be genetically engineered to recognizespecificantigen targets meaning treatment can be personalized to individual patients.Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell Therapy (Modified Cells)In this approach a patients T cells are genetically engineered to display asyntheticreceptor called a chimeric antigen receptor or CAR. CARsdisplay antigen-binding fragmentsof a specific antibody fused to an intracellular T-cell signaling domain. The CAR T cells are expanded and infused back in to the patient. CAR T cells are able torecognize a smaller range of potential antigen targetscompared to TCRs.Natural Killer (NK) Cell Therapy (Modified and Unmodified Cells)Severalnatural killer cell-based immunotherapeutic strategiesare currently being investigated. Whilst autologous NK cells expandedex vivohave been tested in a range of clinical trials for various cancers, success has been limited. This is thoughtto be due to inhibitory receptors on autologous NK cells matching self MHC class Ipresented on tumor cells, and this self recognition consequently inhibited NK cell activation.

Genetic modification of NK cells is also being investigated CAR-NK therapy is currently being clinically evaluated, for example. It is thought treatment with CAR-NK cells could offer severaladvantagesover CAR-T cells:

AdjuvantsThe term adjuvant originates from the Latin word adjuvare meaning help. Adjuvants work by activatinginnate immune pathwayswhich in turn stimulate general immune responses and promote adaptive responses. Adjuvantscan inducedamage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and/or pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) that can activate various pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) on innate immune cells.

An antibody is a protective protein produced by B cells in response to a specific antigen. Scientists can harness the power of antibodies to supplement a patients own immune system by synthesizing customized antibodies. These antibodies specifically target antigens that are typically found in greater numbers on the surface of

Originally posted here:
Treating Cancer 5 Types of Immunotherapy - Technology Networks

Read More...

Genetically engineered animals offer fresh hope to heart valve patients – Horizon magazine

Sunday, December 8th, 2019

Every year, about 300,000 people worldwide receive a new heart valve. Whenever possible, doctors use valves made of tissue from cows or pigs, because the synthetic alternatives can cause blood clots.

But there is a hitch. Although animal tissue valves can last up to 30 years in people over 60 years old, they can be destroyed in just five years in a younger person, probably because of their more aggressive immune system.

Enter the genetically engineered bull.

Scientists used CRISPR gene editing technology to create two bovine mutations that should lessen peoples immune responses to the animal tissue.

The mutations knock out two sugars which coat the bulls cells but are not found in humans: -Gal and Neu5Gc.

The objective is to have animals that express tissues that are less foreign to the human body, said Dr Emanuele Cozzi, coordinator of a project called TRANSLINK, which has been trying to improve the long-term success of heart valve replacements.

In theory this means peoples immune systems will be less likely to attack the animal tissue, added Dr Cozzi, who is director of the Transplant Immunology Unit at Padua University Hospital in Italy.

Clone

As part the project, an Italian company, Avantea, created bovine cells with the two mutations and used them to clone a bull with a technique similar to the one that produced Dolly the sheep.

We are the first to make cattle (with these) mutations, said Professor Cesare Galli, co-founder of Avantea.

The cloning step is required to make the founder animals. Then they can breed normally, said Prof. Galli.

Avantea had created the same mutations in pig cells using a technology called Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN) to edit the DNA, before CRISPR was available.

With CRISPR it is much easier to prepare the reagents that are needed to implement the system, said Prof. Galli.

That makes CRISPR cheaper because the reagents can be prepared in-house. However, in theory at least, it is less accurate, he added. Being less precise in recognising the sequence to cut, there is the risk of undesired cuts - this is a risk that has yet to be quantified.

'The animals we generated could have a potential application for food consumption, at least for people who do not tolerate red meat.'

Professor Cesare Galli, co-founder, Avantea, Italy

Quality of life

About 100,000 people a year are given synthetic heart valves because they are too young to receive the animal tissue version.

But these valves can lead to dangerous blood clots forming, so patients have to live on anticoagulants that impose severe limitations on a young persons life, saysDr Cozzi.

People have to avoid competitive sports and jobs with a high risk of injury, like construction or some police work.

If an accident occurs while on duty (they) may bleed to death, said Dr Cozzi.

Although preliminary data suggests that peoples immune systems attack valve transplants in response to the animal tissue used, scientists need more solid evidence of this before they can recommend using the genetically engineered animal tissue, says Dr Cozzi.

Other factors including someones blood pressure cannot yet be ruled out as affecting the valves lifespan, he says.

To understand more, TRANSLINK is carrying out a study of 1,600 cardiac patients the largest of its kind to compare their immune responses to animal or synthetic valve transplants or other types of surgery. The results are expected next year.

If the study shows convincingly that immunology is behind the premature failure of animal-derived heart valves, it should not be too difficult to find potential investors who could bring the genetically engineered tissue valves to market, says Dr Cozzi.

My hope would be that, based on the data of our study, we may change the outlook of young patients (and offer them) a better quality of life.

The mutations in both pigs and cows may pave the way for people to receive transplants of whole animal organs, Dr Cozzi says.

Red meat allergies

The cloned animals may also benefit people allergic to red meat a reaction which sometimes develops after they have been bitten by a tick.

Scientists think the main culprit is the -Gal sugar found in all animals other than primates.

Anything from a steak to collagen used in cosmetics can trigger a reaction, which can range from a skin rash to anaphylactic shock.

The animals we generated could have a potential application for food consumption, at least for people who do not tolerate red meat, said Prof. Galli.

Some scientists in the US are also looking at possible links between the Neu5Gc sugar and cancer. The World Health Organization has classified red meat as probably carcinogenic to humans,although there is limited evidence.

Millions of years ago, humans developed a mutation that stopped the production of Neu5Gc and produced a slightly different sugar called Neu5Ac instead. The mutation made people resistant to malaria, and quickly spread across the population.

Pigs, sheep, cows and most other mammals with the exception of deer and some dogs - produce the Gc form which is highly antigenic in humans, says Prof. Galli, meaning it prompts a strong immune response.

Chicken and fish do not, which is one reason they are considered to be healthier to eat.

The cloned cows could be a useful source of milk for baby food, as it would be closer to human milk because it does not carry the antigen, says Prof. Galli.

Avantea also plans to use CRISPR to create horses with the same mutations as the cows and pigs. Horse serum is used to make antidotes to snake bites, but it can trigger adverse reactions in some people. Knocking out -Gal and Neu5Gc may prevent that, he says.

The potential for the cloned pigs, cows and horses to improve peoples health is huge. But for the time being, much of it is still theory, the scientists say.

We have the tools now, but there is work to be done to prove whether there is an advantage or not, said Prof. Galli.

The research in this article was funded by the EU. If you liked this article, please consider sharing it on social media.

More:
Genetically engineered animals offer fresh hope to heart valve patients - Horizon magazine

Read More...

‘Crazymothers’ Want You to Stop Calling Them ‘Anti-Vaxxers’ – Livescience.com

Sunday, December 8th, 2019

A group of people opposed to vaccinations has requested that media stop referring to them as "anti-vax." Instead, they would prefer to be called "vaccine risk aware."

On Dec. 1, an anti-vaccine group called the Crazymothers raised its plea on Twitter and Instagram, asserting that the term anti-vaxxer is "derogatory, inflammatory, and marginalizes both women and their experiences." In response, many social media users chimed in with their own alternative labels for the group, including "plague enthusiasts," "polio fanciers," "pro-disease" and "patient zero."

In response to this feedback and subsequent media coverage, the Crazymothers posted a screenshot of a HuffPost article along with the hashtag "#IHitANerve."

The Crazymothers' founder, Hillary Simpson, frequently captions posts with the hashtag #DoYourResearch; so, in that spirit, here are the basics about vaccine safety.

Long story short, the main risks to be aware of are those associated with not vaccinating. Decades of research shows that vaccines are safe and effective and that serious side effects are rare.

When invaders such as bacteria or viruses enter the body for the first time, the immune system generates an elite team of proteins called antibodies to help fight off the invasion. Antibodies latch onto unique proteins that hang off the invaders, known as antigens, and either destroy the pathogen themselves or call in other immune cells to help. The immune system remembers how to build these antibodies long after the initial infection clears, enabling the body to fend off those same type of bugs should they ever launch another attack.

Unfortunately, when a completely unfamiliar antigen enters the body, the immune system may take several days to build up its antibody army. Particularly nasty bugs, like the measles virus, can overwhelm the immune system while its defenses are down.

That's why we have vaccines.

Vaccines contain dead or weakened pathogens that cannot cause infection but do kick the immune system into gear. Once the vaccine enters the body, the immune system produces antibodies as if it's fighting an actual infection. If a vaccinated person later encounters the antigen attached to a real microbe, their body already knows how to quickly ramp up its production of the antibodies needed to fight the infection

Over the past two decades, childhood vaccines have saved the lives of 732,000 U.S. children and prevented more than 300 million kids from getting sick, according to a 2014 study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

A recent statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) put it best: "Vaccines are safe. Vaccines are effective. Vaccines save lives."

Like all medicinal products, vaccines carry some risk of side effects, but nearly 90% of these are not serious, according to the CDC. A 2011 report from the National Academy of Medicine backs this claim, noting that in more than 1,000 studies of vaccines, only rarely did patients experience severe reactions, such as seizures, inflammation of the brain, and fainting..

More than 20 scientific studies confirm that no link exists between the MMR vaccine (for measles, mumps and rubella) and the development of autism, according to the CDC. The study that originally suggested such an association has been retracted and repeatedly discredited.

The MMR vaccine has legitimately been linked to fevers, and in extreme cases, fever-triggered seizures. About 1 in every 3,000 to 4,000 children experiences these seizures after being vaccinated, according to the 2011 report from the National Academy of Medicine.

The rotavirus vaccine has been linked to a serious intestinal disorder called intussusception, but in a 2014 study, scientists found that only 1 in 65,000 vaccinated children develops the condition. Other vaccines may cause mild reactions, like the vague, "flu-like symptoms" you get after getting a flu shot, but these side effects hardly compare to catching the infection itself.

Because vaccines work.

Following the advent of the chickenpox vaccine, cases of the disease fell about 80% over the following decade, according to a 2012 study. Before that vaccine existed, about 4 million people caught chickenpox in the U.S. every year, and among those, 11,000 had to be hospitalized and 100 died, according to the Immunization Action Coalition.

After the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was introduced, the rate of HPV infection among teen girls fell by 56% over the next four years, according to a 2013 study. The rotavirus vaccine has prevented 65,000 U.S. children from being hospitalized with the disease since 2006, according to a 2011 study.

What's more, vaccinating against one disease could bolster your immune system against others. A 2019 study found that catching the actual measles virus wipes the immune system's "memory" of other antigens it has already encountered. In fact, before the measles vaccine was introduced, in the 1960s, an estimated 50% of childhood deaths were associated with infections that kids caught after surviving a bout of measles, according to a 2015 study published in the journal Science. The vaccine, in contrast, defends against the measles virus without damaging the body's defenses against other infection.

Unfortunately, due to a dip in vaccinations, the number of measles cases has increased by more than 280% since 2018, according to the World Health Organization. That means hundreds of thousands of people who caught the virus this year may now bear the brunt of secondary infections as well.

Founded in 2018, the Crazymothers have just over 1,000 followers on Twitter and about 18,000 on Instagram. The group recently hosted an event in Washington to "raise awareness to the current epidemic of chronic health conditions, injuries and death from vaccination." Nearly 3,000 people attended, according to a Crazymothers Instagram post.

The group sells merchandise and offers "expert" advice on its website. The T-shirts depict anti-vaccine moms as superheroes, and these "experts" raise concerns about specific ingredients found in vaccines and the methods by which vaccines are produced.

The efforts of groups like this are a problem, because getting vaccinated doesn't just help the person stuck with the needle; it also protects infants and many people with weak immune systems who cannot be vaccinated at all. Vaccines ensure that fewer cases of the disease occur, and therefore, those without the means to defend themselves are more likely to stay safe and healthy. Anti-vaccine groups like the Crazymothers aim to make vaccination optional, which would place these vulnerable populations at risk, according to the APP.

The Crazymothers may prefer the term "vaccine risk aware," but in reality, unvaccinated children face far greater health risks than those who do get vaccinated. Meanwhile, the vulnerability to disease of unvaccinated kids places others at risk. The fewer people who get vaccinated, the more people will contract perfectly preventable diseases.

To learn more about vaccines, check out the Live Science page dedicated to the topic.

Editor's note: A previous version of this story incorrectly noted that 4,000 people in the U.S. used to catch the chickenpox each year, when the true number was 4 million. The statistic was updated on Dec. 6.

Originally published on Live Science.

View post:
'Crazymothers' Want You to Stop Calling Them 'Anti-Vaxxers' - Livescience.com

Read More...

MaaT Pharma Announces the Presentation of Positive Data with Its Lead Microbiome Biotherapeutic in Intestinal-Predominant Acute…

Sunday, December 8th, 2019

LYON, France--(BUSINESS WIRE)--MaaT Pharma announced today that leading hemato-oncological experts presented clinical data on the compassionate use of MaaT Pharmas lead full-ecosystem microbiome restoration biotherapeutic, MaaT013. The data included eight patients that developed gastrointestinal-predominant, acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease (GI aGvHD) after receiving an allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-HSCT) to treat their hematologic malignancies. All patients were positively impacted by the MaaT013 treatment, with three patients achieving complete response. GvHD, a condition where the transplant donors immune cells attack the patients tissues, is one of the most serious complications of allo-HSCT, and its acute GI form is fatal in most cases. MaaT013 features a consistently high diversity and richness of microbial species in their natural environment. It aims to restore the symbiotic relationship between microbes in the gut and the immune system of the patient to correct the responsiveness and tolerance (homeostasis) of immune functions and thereby contain GI GvHD. The results were presented in a poster presentation on December 7, 2019 during the 61st American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition held in Orlando, Florida.

The GI aGvHD patients who were treated with MaaT013 had a very poor prognosis with no other therapeutic options. The results following MaaT013 administration showed a positive impact on all patients, commented Professor Mohamad Mohty, MD, PhD, Head of the Hematology and Cellular Therapy Department at Sorbonne University, Saint Antoine Hospital in Paris. The most impressive results were seen in those patients who achieved a complete response and who were able to taper and stop using steroids and other immunosuppressants without relapse of gastrointestinal symptoms.

In the presented evaluation, eight patients with a median age of 67 were treated for classical aGvHD, late-onset aGvHD or aGvHD with overlap syndrome that were either steroid-resistant or steroid-dependent following stem cell transplantation. These patients had previously been treated with and failed up to five lines of systemic therapy for aGvHD. Each patient received at least one and up to three doses of MaaT013 and treatment response was evaluated seven days after each administration and on day 28 after the first dose. Based on the best response to the treatment, all eight patients experienced at least a partial response with three patients achieving complete response, two patients with very good partial response and three patients with partial response. Overall, the data demonstrated that reintroduction of a full-ecosystem microbiota provided therapeutic effect and was tolerated in a satisfactory manner in these patients.

Herv Affagard, Co-founder and CEO of MaaT Pharma added, We provided our cGMP-manufactured lead biologic drug, MaaT013, to hospitals as part of a compassionate use program to give GI GvHD patients a therapeutic option where there are no other available treatments after steroids and additional lines of treatment. These findings indicate that reestablishing the gut microbiome improved outcomes in these patients.

Moreover, MaaT Pharma is currently conducting the HERACLES Phase II clinical trial (NCT03359980) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MaaT013 in steroid-refractory, GI aGvHD patients, with more than half of the patients enrolled.

To date, a total of 46 patients with GI GvHD have been treated with MaaT013, including patients under compassionate use and patients enrolled in the Phase II clinical trial. MaaT Pharma is actively developing an oral formulation of MaaT013 (a capsule, MaaT033) to provide easier administration for patients while delivering a similar effect of regenerating the microbial ecosystem with the goal of restoring immune homeostasis in the gut.

The poster can be viewed on the companys website under News.

About HERACLES

The HERACLES study is a multi-center, single-arm, open-label study, enrolling 32 patients to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MaaT Pharmas lead microbiome restoration drug candidate, MaaT013, in steroid-resistant, gastrointestinal-predominant aGvHD patients. Acute GvHD is a serious, often fatal syndrome typically involving the gut, skin, and liver. Treatments up to now focused largely on suppressing the immune reaction that is induced by the donor cells derived from the hematopoietic stem cell graft reacting against the host. These strategies have remained clinically unsuccessful in most cases, with mortality rates around 80% after twelve months in steroid-resistant cases. Patients with hematological malignancies receive multiple courses of chemotherapy, antibiotics, and ultimately conditioning before HSCT, which are known to severely impact the gut microbial composition.

About MaaT013

MaaT013 is the first full-ecosystem, off-the-shelf, reproducible, enema formulation manufactured using MaaT Pharmas integrated Microbiome Restoration Biotherapeutic (MMRB) platform. The product has a stability of up to 24 months and is characterized by a high diversity and consistent richness of microbial species derived from pooled healthy donors and manufactured at the companys centralized European cGMP production facility. MaaT013 has been granted Orphan Drug Designation by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and is already being administered in compassionate use.

About MaaT Pharma

MaaT Pharma, a clinical stage company, has established the most complete approach to restoring patient-microbiome symbiosis to improve survival outcomes in life-threatening diseases. Committed to treating blood cancers and Graft-versus-Host-Disease, a serious complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation, MaaT Pharma has already achieved proof of concept in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Supporting the further expansion of our pipeline into improving outcomes of immunotherapy in solid tumors, we have built a powerful discovery and analysis platform, GutPrint, to evaluate drug candidates, determine novel disease targets and identify biomarkers for microbiome-related conditions. Our biotherapeutics are produced under the strictest cGMP manufacturing and quality control process to safely deliver the full diversity and functionality of the microbiome. MaaT Pharma benefits from the commitment of world-leading scientists and established relationships with regulators to spearhead microbiome treatment integration into clinical practice.

See original here:
MaaT Pharma Announces the Presentation of Positive Data with Its Lead Microbiome Biotherapeutic in Intestinal-Predominant Acute...

Read More...

Can the Keto Diet Help Fight the Flu? – Everyday Health

Sunday, December 8th, 2019

New research suggests that the popular keto diet may help ward off influenza infection.

The study from Yale University, published November 15 in the journal Science Immunology, discovered that mice fed a ketogenic diet (low in carbohydrates but high in fat with moderate protein) were better able to fight off the flu compared with mice given foods that were high in carbs.

This study shows that the way the body burns fat to produce ketone bodies from the food we eat can fuel the immune system to fight flu infection, said the co-senior author Vishwa Deep Dixit, PhD, a doctor of veterinary medicine and a professor of comparative medicine and immunology at Yale, in New Haven, Connecticut, in a statement.

A ketogenic eating plan helps people shed pounds by drastically limiting the intake of carbohydrates (such as breads, pastas, and sweets), while increasing the consumption of meats, dairy, fats, and nonstarchy vegetables.

The diet puts the body into a metabolic state called ketosis, in which the liver breaks down fat into an energy source called ketones, which fuel the body in the absence of glucose.

This type of eating plan has been shown to help maintain blood sugar levels in people with type 2 diabetes. There is also some evidence, such as a study in Federal Practitioner from February 2017, that a keto diet may improve tumor response in cancer patients.

Another study, out of the University of California in Davis in 2017, found that mice on a high-fat diet had a 13 percent longer life span compared with mice on a high-carb diet.

In the latest study, Dr. Dixit and his collaborators observed that the ketogenic diet blocked the formation of inflammasomes, which are immune system activators that can cause harmful immune system responses.

Seeing this response, the scientists set out to test how the diet might affect the flu virus.

The researchers fed a group of mice infected with influenza a keto diet containing less than 1 percent carbs. Another group of infected mice received a standard diet with 58 percent carbs.

The ketogenic diet spurred the release of gamma delta T cells, immune system cells that produce mucus in the cell linings of the lung; but the high-carbohydrate diet did not. An increase in mucus helps capture and eliminate the flu virus from the system, according to researchers.

The researchers also found that the keto diet provided no protection against the influenza virus in mice specially bred without these gamma delta T cells. This confirmed that these cells play a critical role in warding off flu.

We have no idea yet why the gamma delta T cells appear to become activated by the keto diet. This is something well be pursuing in the future, says Emily Goldberg, PhD, a postdoctoral associate at the Yale School of Medicine who collaborated on the research.

A high-carb diet tends to stimulate inflammatory markers which inhibit immune function, says Jan Rystrom, RD, a certified diabetes educator at the Swedish Medical Center in Seattle, who was not involved in the Yale study. This could be the mechanism that the low-carb diet addresses.

On the other hand, some dietitians and medical experts believe that a low-carb diet can compromise the immune system. A lack of carbs may lead to a lack of energy and weaken a persons health overall. There is also evidence that a keto diet can be harmful to the gut microbiome, which is essential to overall well-being.

Rystrom points out that keto diets can have a lot of variation, and ones that are more plant-forward are likely to promote a healthier gut microbiota.

Generally speaking, it is true that the immune system should require increased glucose utilization to mount an effective immune response against infection, says Dr. Goldberg. Its important to keep in mind that there is still glucose availability, albeit very limited, even during a keto diet.

Although Rystrom suggests that the Yale study supports the anti-inflammatory effect of nutritional ketosis, she adds that a keto diet certainly would not be a first line treatment [for flu].

William Schaffner, MD, an infectious-disease specialist at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee, has not seen significant data connecting diet with flu protection.

Its a very intriguing study, says Dr. Schaffner. If we can learn more about how the body fights flu, we can get smarter about how to treat influenza and perhaps prevent it.

He notes that there is some evidence that obesity may lead to a weaker response to flu vaccine, so that may be an indication of how diet could affect flu protection.

Research is needed in humans, however, to validate that the keto diet can effectively protect against the flu.

People are not the same as mice. Thirty thousand to 40,000 people die in the United States each year from influenza, says Len Horovitz, MD, a pulmonary specialist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. Theres no substitute for protection better than a flu shot!

Link:
Can the Keto Diet Help Fight the Flu? - Everyday Health

Read More...

5 herbs you should take in the winter, according to a herbalist – Evening Standard

Sunday, December 8th, 2019

The latest lifestyle, fashion and travel trends

Herbal medicine has had somewhat of a revival in the last few years, perhaps thanks in part to the likes of Gwyneth Paltrowand her love of adaptogens.

If, like us,you're attempting (failing) to stave off the office cold, and are interested in herbal alternatives to boost immunity, we askedherbalist and naturopath Jenya di Pierro, founder ofNotting Hill-based wellness spa Cloud Twelve, for the medicinal herbs she recommends her clients take during the winter months.

The best way to take herbs is in food sources rather than supplements, she explains,"Herbs should be part of our daily diet providing us with vital nutrients and protection against various ailments," says diPierro, who is also a member ofThe Association of Master Herbalists.

"However, the range of medicinal herbs extends beyond culinary varieties and if someone is already sick and requires stronger concentrations the best way to take them is in a tincture form, which is a method of extracting phytochemicals from a herb by macerating them in alcohol for a period of time."

Can chromotherapy help you banish the winter blues?

While some of these are easily availablesuch as garlic and ginger, di Pierro recommends purchasing some of the more obscure varieties from reputable herbalists, her pick isherbs-hands-healing.co.uk,so that you can besure they're harvested, preserved and transported ethically and effectively.

Here are her five top medicinal herbs to take while it's cold out.

Siberian ginseng is an adaptogen (Shutterstock / JRJfin)

Siberian ginseng belongs to the class of herbs that are called adaptogens. Adaptogens aremarkable herbs that help the body adapt to stress and increase vitality. We often get sick when we are tired, cold and flu is the way our body tells us that it needs rest. Adaptogens are very helpful in providing us with nourishmentand, as a result, resistance to disease. They are amphoteric, i.e. have a normalising effect on the body, calms us down when we are wired and can boost our energy when we are tired.

Siberian ginseng specifically enhances immunity against infections, protects against environmental pollutants and radiation by enhancing the liver's abilityto break down toxins. It also has a powerful anti-fatigue effect, can increaseendurance and the ability of the mitochondria cells to produce energy.

Take ginger for a circulation boost (Photo by Dominik Martin on Unsplash)

Ginger is a wonderful warming herb and a circulatory stimulant. Another reason we get sick in winter is because everything gets sluggish when its cold and poor circulation and nutrient supply to tissues and organs results in various deficiencies.

Ginger stimulates, heart and circulation and has a warming effect on the body. It also has anti-bacterial and anti-viral properties and is excellent for sore throats, bringing down fever, clearing catarrh and a wide range of bacterial and viral infections.

The benefits of crushed garlic are greatly reduced by cooking (Photo by team voyas on Unsplash)

Garlic has similar properties and is possiblythe strongest natural anti-bacterial, anti-fungal and anti-viral herb that exists. Its active component allicin is released when garlic is crushed, sadly its beneficial properties are greatly reduced by cooking. One of the best garlic preparations is garlic macerated in apple cider vinegar. Its one of the most popular herbal products at Cloud Twelve in winter and it doesnt give you smelly breath.

Another effective preparation especially for babies are garlic socks. Garlic penetrates very easily through the sock and skin and gets directly into the blood stream clearing infection quite quickly. It can also be applied on the chest through a cloth for respiratory tract infections and catarrh (applying it directly will burn the skin).

Echinacea is thought to activate the immune system (Photo by Meg G on Unsplash)

Echinacea is a wonder herb that does not directly kill bacteria or viruses, but activates our immune system and enhances lymph function which houses white blood cells, more specifically macrophages which play a key role in the orchestration of the immune response.

It is commonly used asa supportive therapy in the treatment of the common cold and upper respiratory tract infections and hasalso been shown to possess palliative effects on wound damage and inflammation.

The elder tree is considered a 'medicine chest'(Shutterstock / Africa Studio)

With its abundant white flowers,the elder tree has been called the "medicine chest", as it has so many health benefits.

A hot tea infusion of flowers can help duringthe onset of a cold, fever, flu, tonsillitis or laryngitis. Its decongestant and relaxant effects can also relieve catarrh and bronchial congestion. Both flowers and berries are antimicrobial.

Gargle with an elder flower infusion to soothe asore throat, mouth ulcers or inflamed gums, or use it as an eyewash for conjunctivitis or sore and tired eyes.

Flowers, meanwhile, can be calming and soothing for tension, anxiety and depression.

Read more:
5 herbs you should take in the winter, according to a herbalist - Evening Standard

Read More...

Celgene Gave This Tech Back to Editas Medicine, but It Could Prove Valuable – The Motley Fool

Sunday, December 8th, 2019

In the middle of November, Editas Medicine (NASDAQ:EDIT) and Celgene (NASDAQ:CELG) announced changes to a development pact originally formed in 2015 with Juno Therapeutics, which is now part of Celgene. The agreement was amended in 2018, too, so the fact that changes were made wasn't necessarily big news. Editas received a $70 million upfront payment for executing the amended agreement, which was interpreted as the main takeaway from the announcement.

The announcement barely registered with investors and few gave it much thought for too long, especially after promising early results from the first clinical trials using a CRISPR-based medicine were announced by CRISPR Therapeutics days later.

But revisiting the amended collaboration agreement, and specifically what changes were made, hints at the long-term development plans of Editas Medicine. In short, it now has full control over an important class of immune cells. Whether that means the gene-editing pioneer lands another major development partner or goes full-steam ahead alone, investors can't overlook the significance.

Image source: Getty Images.

The basic scientific goal of the collaboration hasn't changed. Editas Medicine will use its gene-editing technology platform to engineer T cell receptors (TCR), while Juno Therapeutics will leverage its immunotherapy leadership to develop the engineered cellular medicines in clinical trials.

Why engineer TCRs? Immune cells rely on their receptors to identify targets, such as pathogenic bacteria and cancer cells. But immune cell receptors can be confused by molecules secreted within the tumor microenvironment, forcing them to halt their attack. They can also incorrectly attack an individual's own cells to trigger an autoimmune disease. A more recent concern stems from cellular medicines derived from a donor. Since the donor cells present different receptors compared to what the recipient's native T cells carry, the recipient's immune system (correctly) identifies the immunotherapy as a foreign substance, attacks it, and renders it less effective and less safe.

Therefore, it makes sense to engineer TCRs to create more potent and stealthier immunotherapies that are less likely to be tricked. Editas Medicine and Celgene still intend to do just that, albeit with subtle, yet important, differences to their development agreement.

Consideration

Previous Agreement (2015, 2018)

Amended Agreement (2019)

Focus

Cancer

Cancer and autoimmune diseases

Types of cells

CAR-T cells, alpha-beta T cells, gamma-delta T cells

Alpha-beta T cells

Juno Therapeutics exclusivity

Editas Medicine prohibited from all other work with CAR-T and TCRs in oncology

Editas Medicine prohibited from all other work on alpha-beta T cells and T cells derived from pluripotent stem cells

Upfront payment

$57.7 million (includes milestones collected under agreement)

$70 million

Milestone potential

$920 million plus tiered royalties

$195 million plus tiered royalties

Data source: SEC filings.

Essentially, Editas Medicine and Celgene have scaled back their original agreement in cancer and expanded their work to include autoimmune diseases. The most important detail is that the amended agreement allows the gene-editing pioneer to pursue the development of gamma-delta T cells, which were previously under the exclusive control of Juno Therapeutics. What does that mean?

Image source: Getty Images.

Without getting too far into the weeds, there are two main types of TCRs: alpha-beta and gamma-delta. The name refers to the molecular structure of the receptor, but that's not the important part.

Gamma-delta T cells, which comprise only about 5% of the T cells in your body, are thought to be one of the missing links in our understanding of the immune system. They're a mysterious bunch, but there could be significant value residing in the knowledge gaps.

These unique immune cells are governed by their own unique set of rules (relative to their alpha-beta peers) and straddle the innate immune system (what we're programmed with at birth) and adaptive immune systems (what's programmed as we encounter new environments throughout life). Gamma-delta T cells could be tinkered with in gut microbiome applications, to treat cardiovascular diseases, and to neutralize antibiotic-resistant infections. But the nearest commercial target of the mysterious immune cells is likely to be treating solid tumor cancers.

They possess potent anti-tumor activity where current immunotherapies fail, such as attacking cancer cells that lack tumor-specific antigens to target or that have become immune to checkpoint inhibitors. In fact, there's a link between certain cancer outcomes and the activity of specific gamma-delta T cells.

Given that, why would Celgene amend the agreement to ditch the rare subset of immune cells? Well, in August 2019, Celgene inked with a start-up called Immatics to develop engineered TCRs. The start-up's platform is based on gamma-delta tech.

Don't feel too bad for Editas Medicine, though. SEC filings reveal that the gene-editing pioneer didn't receive any money from the original collaboration deal with Celgene in the first nine months of 2019. That suggests the work had stalled or that the amendment was being hammered out for some time. The gene-editing pioneer wrestled back control of the tech and took a $70 million upfront payment to boot. While the potential milestone payments in the amended agreement are significantly lower than the originally promised bounty, Editas Medicine can offset that by signing a lucrative collaboration deal with a new partner.

There should be plenty of interest. Fellow gamma-delta T cell developer Adicet Bio recently landed an $80 million series B round funded in part by Johnson & Johnson, Regeneron,Samsung Biologics(not the same company as the electronics powerhouse), and Novartis. There's also Immatics, GammaDelta Therapeutics, and a handful of other start-ups making noise in the space.

Some competitors are directly engineering gamma-delta cells, and others are developing molecules to trigger the immune cells into action. Editas Medicine believes it has the edge, as it has a relatively precise and efficient method for engineering immune cells: gene editing.

The amended collaboration deal between Editas Medicine and Celgene received relatively little attention from investors. Perhaps that was a good thing, as Wall Street likely would have overreacted to the reduced scope of development and milestones. But investors that take the time to understand the details might be intrigued by the new research avenue for the gene-editing stock.

Can Editas Medicine become a leading force in gamma-delta T cell development? Perhaps. While it isn't the only company wielding a gene-editing platform, and CRISPR gene editing isn't the only type of gene editing, the company is well-positioned to take advantage of the opportunity. Investors will have to wait to see how (or if) the development strategy evolves around the new tech.

Originally posted here:
Celgene Gave This Tech Back to Editas Medicine, but It Could Prove Valuable - The Motley Fool

Read More...

No Harm, No Foul What If Darwinism Were Excised from Biology? – Discovery Institute

Sunday, December 8th, 2019

Some biologists might shudder at the thought of eliminating Darwinism from their scientific work. A Darwin-ectomy sounds more painful than a tonsillectomy or appendectomy. To hard-core evolutionists, it might sound like a cephalectomy (removal of the head)! If Darwinism is as essential to biology as Richard Dawkins or Jerry Coyne argues, then removing evolutionary words and concepts should make research incomprehensible.

If, on the other hand, Darwinism is more of a narrative gloss applied to the conclusions after the scientific work is done, as the late Philip Skell observed, then biology would survive the operation just fine. It might even be healthier, slimmed down after disposing of unnecessary philosophical baggage. Here are some recent scientific papers in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) to use as test cases.

In PNAS recently, Adam C. Soloff and Michael T. Lotze reviewed findings by Liu et al. about the immune system. Suffused within the narrative is plenty of Darwinspeak. Does it add anything of value?

Immunity evolved as an impossibly elegant, yet devastatingly destructive force to combat pathogens, environmental insults, and rogue malignant cellular agents arising from within. The immunologic arsenal developed in a veritable coevolutionary arms race with the worlds pathogens, culminating in lymphocytic weapons of mass destruction. Indeed, T cells and B cells endowed with antigen specificity, the capacity for clonal expansion, and most importantly, long-lived memory, represent the pinnacle of such evolution. Together with the innate immune response, the adaptive immune system holds the power to mediate sustained inflammatory responses with such voracity that tissues, organs, or the host itself may endure critical collateral damage. To preserve balance, adaptive immunity has developed under the guiding principle of primum non nocere, or first, to do no harm, limiting the aggression of the innate immune response (e.g., septic shock, penumbra of cerebrovascular and brain infarcts). Herein, redundant mechanisms to preclude aberrant deleterious immunity have evolved as the predominant state of being, establishing a significant molecular and cellular threshold to initiate and maintain inflammation. Often overlooked, following the excitement of the active immune response, are the critical means by which the host resolves the inflammatory process, restoring local and systemic balance. The findings by Liu et al. provide further description of molecular processes and cellular mediators of the resolution process, shedding light on mechanistic aspects of immune homeostasis. [Emphasis added.]

What, exactly, does the e-word evolved add to the understanding of the adaptive immune system? It adds fat, not meat. The essential parts of the explanation could be conveyed easily without Darwin. Basically,

Isnt that cleaner? The reader can breathe easier without the smoke of being told over and over that all these elegant mechanisms evolved.

Seven biologists looked for convergent evolution between two very different mammals whales and bats that use echolocation. Amir Marcovitz et al., in PNAS, relied on Darwinism for their research. Its right there in the title: A functional enrichment test for molecular convergent evolution finds a clear protein-coding signal in echolocating bats and whales. The researchers found not only phenotypic convergence, but convergence all the way down to protein molecules! Can the findings survive a Darwin-ectomy? Sounds like a tough operation.

Echolocation is a prime example of convergent evolution, the independent gain of similar features in species of different lineages. Is phenotypic convergence driven by underlying molecular convergence? If so, could molecular convergence include contributions from highly constrained, often-pleotropic, coding regions? We develop a generalizable test that offers a resounding yes to both extensively debated questions. Our test highlights molecular convergence in genes regulating the cochlear ganglion of echolocating bats and whales, the skin of aquatic mammals, and the lung of high-altitude mammals. Importantly, the approach correctly dismisses confounding convergence-like patterns, such as those from sequence decay of vision genes in blind subterranean species, and is readily applicable to the thousands of genomes sequenced across the tree of life.

Their work not only relies on Darwinism, but promises to help future research. How could anyone claim that Darwinism is useless to this paper? Actually, its quite easy. Its as easy as showing that any other kind of circular reasoning is useless in science. These seven biologists assumed evolution, and concluded evolution. The observations had nothing to do with it.

Some extreme examples can show the fallacy. Humans and turtles can hold their breath underwater. Is that convergent evolution? Turtles cant think, but humans can. Is that divergent evolution? If tricycles and race cars alike are found to contain both aluminum and iron, did they obtain those through blind, unguided processes? So it is with two very different mammals bats and whales that use sound for echolocation. Neither the similarities nor differences prove convergent evolution (or divergent evolution, for that matter), unless you start with that assumption. Its a non sequitur to conclude they evolved.

You can cherry-pick the evidence to support a previously assumed explanation. In this paper, against a backdrop of previous failures to find convergence at the molecular level, the team celebrates their discovery of gene enrichment for cochlear ganglion, lung, and skin but not for a multitude of other traits that should have converged, such as for pharynx, sound generation, and behavior. Even at that, their findings are statistical, not causal, and fail to include potential non-coding influences on the genes. If bats and dolphins were found to use completely different proteins for the cochlear ganglion, the authors would undoubtedly have explained that by evolution, too. No matter how similar or different the animals are in other respects, the conclusion is predetermined: they evolved the common trait, as well as the different traits. In this game, evolutionists cant lose.

Oh yes, this approach will surely help evolutionists with their future research. All they have to do is apply circular reasoning, too. Science marches on!

The paper could be completely revamped without references to evolution, and would be better for it. The researchers could have learned from the similarities and differences in bats and whales, studied the design principles for echolocation in air compared to echolocation in water, and applied the knowledge to human sonar or ultrasonic sensing. Without the evolutionary fat, the science would be useful and productive for human flourishing. Instead, the biologists wasted time on a myth that blind, unguided processes can take sound and build complex systems that can utilize it. Thats ridiculous. Anyone who has watched Illustras detailed animation of dolphin echolocation should realize that sound has no such creative power.

It would seem an impossible challenge to research Darwins finches without reference to Darwin or Darwinism. Yet in their latest paper in PNAS, Peter and Rosemary Grant, who have spent their careers studying these icons of evolution, once again show that science has no need for the Darwin hypothesis. In fact, they created more problems for Darwinism than support.

Adaptive radiations, comprising many species derived from one or a small number of ancestral species in a geologically short time, are prominent components of the worlds biodiversity. Introgressive hybridization of divergent species has been important in increasing variation, leading to new morphologies and even new species, but how that happens throughout evolutionary history is not known. A long-term field study of Darwins finches on Daphne Major island, Galpagos, shows that introgression enhances variation and increases the potential for future evolution. We use a dated phylogeny to infer that populations became more variable in morphological traits through time, consistent with this enhancement effect, and then declined in variation after reaching a maximum. Introgression may be especially important with future climate change.

It will take some radical surgery to remove the Darwinian concepts in the Grants paper, but will the science survive? Take a closer look at what they actually found. First of all, they admit that the effect of introgressive hybridization on adaptive radiation is not known. Ponder that for a moment. After 160 years, has Darwinism been so useless that it has not shed light on a process that should have been well known by now, particularly with these iconic birds? Even worse, though, is that introgression and hybridization involve shuffling existing genetic information. It has nothing to do with variation by random mutation being selected by a blind watchmaker, much less being able to build an irreducibly complex system. Search for selection in the paper and you find only faith, not evidence, that natural selection might work in tandem with introgressive hybridization to produce new species. The only examples of selection they offer involve microevolution, not innovation. For those, they do lateral passes to other Darwinists in the references.

Finally, the finches are still finches. In Darwin Devolves, Behe argues that all species of finches can vary up to the family level without supporting Darwinism. The variations observed by the Grants amount to dimes and pennies in hundred-thousand-dollar transactions, he quips. And did you notice the Grants admitting that the finches variability declined after reaching a maximum? How is that going to fit Darwinism, which requires unlimited variability and progress?

The research on these beautiful, well-designed birds could have been done by someone like Gregor Mendel, who found discrete shuffling of existing traits in peas instead of blending inheritance that Darwin expected. Students could learn about how the shuffling occurs, permitting the birds to survive in oscillating conditions. They could learn about how adaptation of complex systems to changing environments requires Foresight, as Marcos Eberlin has shown. The work of Peter and Rosemary Grant on Darwins finches has offered nothing of substance to support Darwins theory, despite the name. They have not shown that natural selection (even if assumed to have creative power) can surpass the family level and proceed upward to make human brains from bacteria. As confirmation of Darwinism, it has been a tragic waste of time. But all is not lost. Their work has been very helpful to design advocates, showing that, at best, Darwinism can add a millimeter to a bird beak here and there, until the drought ends.

So, here are three papers in Americas premier science journal that appear at first glance to need Darwinism, use Darwinism, support Darwinism, and thereby impart useful scientific knowledge. After subjecting them to Darwin-ectomies, though, the science not only survived, but proved healthier and more useful. Science will do better without the useless fat thinking that blind, unguided processes can account for bats, whales, and immune systems.

Photo: Dolphins of the Galpagos Islands, by Gregory Slobirdr Smith [CC BY-SA 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons.

Read this article:
No Harm, No Foul What If Darwinism Were Excised from Biology? - Discovery Institute

Read More...

These blood markers may indicate a higher risk of disease and death – Medical News Today

Sunday, December 8th, 2019

A new study suggests that some readings from routine blood tests could help identify people at higher risk of disease and death related to disease. Doctors currently use the readings as markers of immune condition and inflammation.

The study investigators analyzed 12 years of data from 31,178 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

They found that those with low levels of lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell, were more likely to die from heart disease, cancer, and respiratory illnesses, such as pneumonia and influenza.

The analysis showed that the link between low lymphocytes a condition called lymphopenia and higher risk of disease and death did not vary with age or other common risk factors.

However, the predictive power of the low lymphocyte count increased when the scientists added two other measures of blood abnormality: one relating to inflammation and the other to the ability to maintain a supply of red blood cells.

The research is the work of teams from the University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, in Ohio, and other institutions. They report their findings in a recent JAMA Network Open paper.

"Scientists have gone to great lengths and expense to develop novel biomarkers to identify people at the highest risk for death and disease," says study author Jarrod E. Dalton, Ph.D., who co-led the investigation.

"Here," he adds, "we have taken a more pragmatic approach investigating the predictive power of components of a patient's white blood cell count, which is collected as part of routine blood work during standard health exams."

Dalton is an epidemiologist at the Cleveland Clinic's Lerner Research Institute.

In their study paper, he and colleagues remark on the increasing availability of drugs that target the immune system to treat established disease. These treatments seek to either reduce or boost immune activity, depending on the underlying relationship to disease.

However, they urge that there is also a great and unmet need for tools and methods to help prevent immune-related diseases in the general population in the first place.

Around 2040% of white blood cells are lymphocytes. A shortage of lymphocytes leaves the body susceptible to infection.

While scientists have recognized that a low lymphocyte count is a strong risk factor for premature death in people with a particular heart valve condition, there has been little research on its value as a more general predictor of survival.

In the new study, the researchers wished to discover whether lymphocyte counts could be an effective way to assess the risk of disease and disease-related death in a nationally representative adult population.

They performed the analysis with lymphocyte count on its own, then together with two other markers.

The two additional markers were red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and C-reactive protein (CRP).

RDW is a measure of how well the body can produce and maintain a healthy supply of red blood cells. CRP is a marker of inflammation.

The analysis linked low lymphocyte count with reduced survival both on its own and in conjunction with other blood markers, especially RDW and CRP.

From the analysis, the researchers conclude that around 20% of the general adult population of the United States appear to have a high risk profile, according to these markers.

In addition, they calculated that the chance of dying within the next 10 years for those with the highest risk profiles was 28%, compared with only 4% for those with the lowest risk profiles.

The team suggests that with more research, it should soon be possible to understand the biological nature of the relationship between these markers and disease. Such knowledge could help identify suitable treatment targets.

In the meantime, it should be possible to help doctors use the markers to identify those with the highest risk of premature death as part of routine preventive care and screening.

"The complete blood count test is convenient, inexpensive, and as our findings suggest may be used to help physicians screen for and prevent disease and disease-related mortality."

Jarrod E. Dalton, Ph.D.

Read the original:
These blood markers may indicate a higher risk of disease and death - Medical News Today

Read More...

Dont kiss the baby: Warning issued to help prevent dangerous illness – WGN TV Chicago

Sunday, December 8th, 2019

Please enable Javascript to watch this video

They look so sweet and cuddly. You've been waiting to see the precious bundles. But unfortunately, mild adult illness can be a huge hurdle for the tiniest babies.

So do not kiss the baby this holiday season. It may seem a harsh warning but it could save lives.

Dr Ravi Jhaveri is an infectious disease physician at Lurie Childrens Hospital.

It is possible that one contact is enough to transmit the virus. And babies are incredibly susceptible, he said.

The first time you see any virus or bacteria tends to be worse because your immune system is learning how to deal with it. And so your fever may be higher, your symptoms may be worse. And then the next time it happens, its much better because your immune system remembers. And thats why older kids and adults only get cold symptoms when they get exposed again to RSV.

Any child younger than 2 is at risk. Premature babies and those with compromised immune systems are at an even greater threat. The biggest concern is RSV, or respiratory syncytial virus.

An average of 57,000 children younger than 5 are hospitalized with RSV every year. And it can be life-threatening.

RSV causes damage to airways, and so there is debris that collects, Jhaveri said. And a little baby has a really small airway. So you can imagine if its a little straw it doesnt take much to block that straw.

There is no vaccine for RSV like there is for the flu, but one is in the works that would potentially be given to pregnant women.

The approach thats being used and is promising in early research is the idea that women that are pregnant could get vaccinated the way that we do it for whooping cough, Jhaveri said. Every pregnant woman gets a whooping cough vaccine, and she can pass those antibodies to baby when he or she is born. So the same thing with RSV.

So what parents of young children can do?

We also advocate that we shouldnt keep kids in a bubble, that social contact with family and close friends is a really rich part of their development, so we need to balance the two, Jhaveri said.

Symptoms of RSV include wheezing, difficulty breathing, runny nose, congestion and fever.

When you can tell your baby is struggling to breathe, get them to a doctor right away.

See the rest here:
Dont kiss the baby: Warning issued to help prevent dangerous illness - WGN TV Chicago

Read More...

Progression, trends and industry leaders in HIV and AIDS research – Drug Target Review

Sunday, December 8th, 2019

HIV is a disease still common in sub-Saharan Africa despite global research since 1982. This article delves into the trends, opportunities and key players in HIV research, exploring future possibilities for treating the disease.

Approximately 38 million people globally are living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Despite a steady decline in cases since 2000 due to successes in tackling the disease, HIV remains a major health problem and international focus of research.

The World Health Organization (WHO) holds World AIDS Day on the 1 December every year to highlight the continued global fight against HIV and AIDS.

Drug Target ReviewsHannah Balfour explores the HIV/AIDS research insights produced by Elseviers Analytical Services expounding on trends and where the future of HIV therapy lies.

The report highlights that antiretroviral therapy is prescribed to reduce HIV viral load but can result in adverse effects.

Unfortunately, side effects are common and include cardiac, liver and kidney problems. Some children also show life threatening extreme inflammatory reactions to opportunistic infections after antiretroviral therapy. In addition, antiretrovirals frequently interact unfavourably with other drugs, causing adverse effects and interfering with efficacy.

These issues mean patients may discontinue taking their medications or administer their medication inconsistently due to the complexities of the treatment regimen both can lead to drug resistance.

Uncertainty remains over the long-term metabolic effects of antiretroviral therapy; as a result, prognosis is unclear for children undergoing treatment as they move into adulthood.

Since the coining of the term HIV in 1982, research output has coincided with the trends in incidence of the disease. This is indicated by HIV-related content representing 1.2 percent of all Scopus-indexed research papers at the pandemics height between 1992 and 1995 and since falling to only 0.6 percent in 2018, as demonstrated in the report.

Not only has the scale of research changed but the drug targets have too. Viral HIV protein targets were the focus of researchers in the first 20 years, whereas more recently the spotlight has shifted to the proteins of the patients intrinsic immune system.

Antiretroviral medication was traditionally designed to have selective toxicity for HIV, aiming to suppress replication to undetectable levels, thereby reducing the viral load. This was achieved by targeting proteins specific to HIV, in particular: viral protease, reverse transcriptase, integrase, gp120 and gp41.

Recently, research has shifted to focus on drug targets such as host immune system proteins and novel host targets in order to:

Drugs specific to CCR5 and CD4 targets within the host immune system that allow HIV to enter immune cells have already been approved for use in patients by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These include Pfizers maraviroc, which is only prescribed after genetic testing to assure the virus enters the immune cells by CCR5 binding and is therefore susceptible to the drug.

research output has coincided with the trends in incidence of the disease

Maraviroc is intended for people whose other HIV drugs no longer work, says Steven Galson, director of the FDAs Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. This is an important new product for many HIV-infected patients who have not responded to other treatments and have few options.

Meanwhile, novel host target research has particularly focused on SAMHD1, an enzyme that prevents HIV replication in the cells of the immune system by depleting the pool of dNTPs required for viral DNA synthesis.

Publication output is used by Elsevier as an indicator of a countrys research contribution. Output assessment from the report, using Scopus and SciVal, showed that the US produced 35,493 HIV/AIDS-related publications between 2014 and 2018, making them the biggest producer of HIV research globally.

The UK contributed 7,879 as the second highest contributor and South Africa closely followed with 6,823.

the future of research is collaborative, whether internationally or between corporate and academic institutions

Interestingly, some 2,713 of all research publications by the top 10 countries between 2014 and 2018 were the result of academic and corporate collaborations (approximately 3.4 percent). Leidos, Gilead Sciences and GlaxoSmithKline were the main corporate collaborators, with 290, 178 and 153 publications respectively.

A research activity index (RAI) was used to establish which countries were exceeding the proportion seen on average globally. This was calculated for countries with at least 1,000 publications between 2014 and 2018, a score above one is greater than the global average, a score below one is less than the global average. The top scorers for HIV/AIDS research were Uganda, Kenya, South Africa and Nigeria, perhaps some of the most affected areas.

RAI score positively correlates with the disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for these areas, with Uganda, Kenya and South Africa having the highest RAI/DALY rate respectively.

International collaboration features highly in the top institutions; making up more than half of the output. The University of Cape Town had overseas collaborators on 73.9 percent of their output and one in five publications from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) had international collaborators. The report revealed these two institutions as the top contributors in HIV/AIDS research.

Despite a flood of research since 1982, HIV/AIDS continues to be a risk to public health, with some 28 million sufferers globally in 2018. According to the report, the focus has shifted since the start of research with drug targets now being discovered in patients immune systems rather than in the viral proteome. This could lead to major advances that can both supplement a traditional antiretroviral regimen and possibly look to replace the decades-old treatments that have so many shortfalls and side-effects.

The analytical report also highlighted that the future of research is collaborative, whether internationally or between corporate and academic institutions. The key players being both those most affected by the disease, such as Uganda, Kenya and South Africa and some of the top producers of research globally, for example, the US and UK.

HIV infects CD4 lymphocytes of the human hosts immune system, causing destruction that results in progressive immune deficiency if left untreated.

The condition is transmitted through bodily fluids including blood, semen and breast milk which means children are at major risk of infection either in utero, during birth or through breastfeeding. Other common causes are the use of contaminated needles and unprotected sexual contact.

Symptoms range from mild possibly asymptomatic to severe, where Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) occurs. AIDS is characterised by an extremely low CD4 lymphocyte count (less than 200 CD4 cells/L blood) or opportunistic infections causing comorbidities, most commonly hepatitis B and C and tuberculosis.

Read more from the original source:
Progression, trends and industry leaders in HIV and AIDS research - Drug Target Review

Read More...

Discoveries in the Making concludes fall series on Dec. 10 – UAB News

Sunday, December 8th, 2019

Discoveries in the Making speakers present on a variety of topics and new discoveries found through research.

Hosted by the University of Alabama at Birmingham Graduate School, Discoveries in the Making will give graduate students and postdoctoral researchers an opportunity to share their exciting new discoveries with the public on Tuesday, Dec. 10, at The Lumbar in Birmingham.

The upcoming talk in the final Discoveries in the Making series include:

Speaker: Colleen Anusiewicz;Title: Causes and consequences of nurse bullying in Alabama hospitals

Summary: United States health care organizations continue to experience pressure to provide safe, high-quality patient care in a constantly evolving health care landscape. The presence of workplace bullying in the nursing profession may undermine safety culture in the workplace, potentially affecting nursing care and patient outcomes. This presentation will present preliminary findings of the organizational characteristics and patient outcomes associated with nurse-reported workplace bullying in health care organizations located throughout Alabama.

Speaker: Nicole Gallups;Title: T cells in Multiple System Atrophy: Good guys turned bad?

Summary: Multiple system atrophy is a neurological condition similar to Parkinsons disease but with no treatment options, and it is fatal. Gallups research has shown that the immune system plays an important role in the disease progression. She hopes to provide a possible treatment for MSA by manipulating the immune system.

The Discoveries in the Making series is free and open to the public. A complete schedule is available online.

Continued here:
Discoveries in the Making concludes fall series on Dec. 10 - UAB News

Read More...

Families reeling after FDA rejects therapy for kids without a thymus – STAT

Sunday, December 8th, 2019

When Charlie Luckesen turned 2 the Wednesday before Thanksgiving, his family celebrated with a golden balloon nearly twice his height, a construction-paper banner that spelled out Oh Twodles, and an enormous, icing-swirled cake. But the whole day was tinged with unease.

Before his birth, a flock of cells that should have swept around from his nascent spinal cord to his chest was somehow thrown off, and he never developed an organ called the thymus. Not having a thymus meant not having T cells, and not having T cells meant not having a functional immune system. This ultra-rare condition, known as pediatric congenital athymia, left Charlie deeply unprepared for life outside the womb. To him, a common cold or an everyday speck of bacteria could be deadly.

My oldest the one thats 7 hes frequently asked what happens if Charlie dies, said their mother, Katie Luckesen, who lives in San Diego. To her, its a legitimate question: Her whole family knows that without treatment, Charlies disorder is usually fatal by 2. And here he is, at two years old

advertisement

All that was supposed to change on Wednesday, when the Food and Drug Administration had to decide whether it was approving a tissue implant that can dramatically increase such childrens chances of survival. Since 1993, 101 children have gotten the experimental treatment at Duke University Hospital, and 73 of them are still alive. With numbers like that, the approval seemed like a shoo-in, almost a formality. As soon as the positive decision was announced, the Luckesens were told, theyd get a call about scheduling Charlies surgery.

On Wednesday, Katie Luckesen checked her phone again and again while snuggling with her daughter, while helping the kids with schoolwork, while making stovetop Christmas toffee but the good news never came. Only the next morning did she learn that regulators had rejected the application. The issues raised were not about how safe or effective the treatment was, but rather about certain manufacturing problems, according to Enzyvant, the Cambridge, Mass., company that commercialized the treatment.

Everyones kind of reeling today, Luckesen said. I dont think anyone knows what to think yet. Does it mean they can continue doing transplants or does it mean theyre going to go back on hold?

Enzyvant declined to disclose the specific issues that led to the FDA rejection of the therapy, called Rethymic. This is definitely a surprise, said Rachelle Jacques, the companys CEO, adding that its priority is to make sure patients get treated as quickly as possible. She wasnt sure what would have to happen for doctors at Duke to continue performing the procedure as an experimental treatment while Enzyvant responds to the FDAs concerns.

I tell ya, everybody in their lives has a time when theyre knocked down, said Dr. Louise Markert, the Duke immunologist who pioneered the technique. And you know, what you have to do is get back up and keep working. Its not pleasant being knocked down at all, but you just have to get back at it.

For parents, though, every moment of delay is another one in which they might lose their child to an infection. Unfortunately some have passed in the wait, said Maggie Shaw, of Orillia, Ontario, whose daughter, Aunika Kerr, received Markerts treatment in the summer of 2017.

Katie and JD Luckesen have already taken Charlie for countless tests to show hes eligible. Theyve already fought two insurance denials to make sure that the therapy will be covered even if it hasnt yet been approved. Theyve already waited through all of 2018, while Markert stopped treating kids to compile data for the FDA. Theyve already waited through much of 2019, knowing that experimental operations had started up again and hoping Charlies turn would come.

Occasionally, they disagree about how best to handle the uncertainty. JD is a military chaplain who spends his days talking over Navy members darkest fears and memories. He believes in addressing issues head on. Weve had discussions If Charlie were to pass, where would we bury him? said Katie. Because hes a chaplain, he feels, its important to have the discussion ahead of time, and I would rather bury my head in the sand and not think about it sometimes.

Even within herself, though, shes divided. The intellectual part of her understands that the FDAs work is important, that it helps keep treatments safe. But the mother in her hates it. I just want to send them pictures of my son, to say Look at this face, how can you not approve something that is his only chance at life?

It all began with an unexpected call in 1991. Markert happened to be on duty when the phone rang, and she found herself talking to her counterpart at a hospital in Knoxville, Tenn. He said he had an infant on his hands that he didnt know what to do with. Out of the nearly 4 million babies born each year in the United States, only 20 or so are born without a thymus, and because of genetic mutations or chemical imbalances during development or causes still unknown, this kid was unlucky enough to be one of them. There was no accepted treatment. Did Markert want to take charge of his care?

Sure, she said, and the child was transferred from Knoxville to Durham, N.C. The baby came and unfortunately had a medical event and died, she recalled. But I was already on my way: I was trying to learn how to slice thymus so that it might be implanted in a patient.

To most of us, the thymus is one of our obscurer bits, belonging with the pineal gland and the gall bladder on the list of lumps you may have heard of but couldnt pinpoint on a bodily map. To a pediatric cardiac surgeon who is trying, say, to patch up a hole in a newborns heart with cloth or with tissue taken from the thorax of a cow, the thymus occupies a slightly different role: Its a nuisance, an obstacle to work around. Peel away the layers of an infants chest, and youd see only part of the heart, strawberry-sized and pulsing. Whats covering the top half is the thymus.

If you were to take the whole thing out and splay it out youd think, That looks kind of like a butterfly, said Dr. Joseph Turek, chief of pediatric cardiac heart surgery at Duke. He doesnt do that. Instead, with his forceps, he pulls apart the ghostly membrane around it, cauterizes any blood vessels he needs to sever, and lifts out most of the organ, knowing that a pennys width of thymus is enough for the rest to grow back. In operating rooms around the country, the part thats cut away is just trash, to be carted off along with bloodied drapes and plastic suction tips and other surgical tools that arent reused.

Thats what Markert was trying to slice. It sounds almost too convenient: Some babies missing a gland, others who need to have most of theirs resected. But she knew it wasnt that simple.

To explain why, she likes to imagine T cells as kids. Like other white blood cells, these ones are born and bred in the bone marrow but unlike some, they get trained in the thymus. Thats where they learn to recognize whats foreign and whats self, what to attack and what to leave be. This is like a real schoolhouse: it takes about six months for the graduation, and the blood cells that come out of the thymus, they wear a graduation cap, she said.

If she had transplanted a lump of thymus from one baby into another, as you might with a piece of liver, all those newly graduated T cells wouldve recognized the recipients body as foreign and mounted an attack. Earlier doctors were aware of this. Theyd been slicing up the organ into bits long before 1991, and were already vigilant for signs of rejection. But they didnt have a foolproof way of detecting those molecular graduation caps. They couldnt tell whether a babys thymus was producing real, well-trained T cells, or whether the chemistry of the bone marrow had forged a kind of feral militia, good at charging but bad at discerning friend from foe.

Around the time that baby arrived from Knoxville, that was starting to change. Another researcher at Duke, an infectious disease specialist and immunologist named Dr. Barton Haynes, had spent years unraveling the mysteries of the thymus. His team had picked apart samples, classifying cells, poring over tissue swirls. They concocted chemicals that would glow in the presence of different components, could tell a T cell from an imposter. We learned how the schoolhouse is built, he said. We learned how the roof came on and how the rooms were made.

That meant they could tell Markert whether her thymus slices were worth implanting. Her task was tricky: The tissue needed to be alive but mostly emptied of its T cells. So, using previous research as a guide, she turned a Petri dish into a kind of amphibious terrarium for tissues. Shed set sponges in a nutritious broth, with her organ slices on top. Every day, shed drip a solution over her pets, both to keep them moist and to wash out most of their T cells. At first, the liquid in the dish would become milky with these remnants of the donors immune system. But then, day by day, as the ritual progressed, and fewer white cells were left, the stuff grew clear.

In retrospect, it sounds easy. It wasnt. Markert brought every sample to Haynes, who would freeze it and slip it under the microscope. Hed say, Oh, Louise, its all dead. You can never put this into a patient. Go back and try again, she remembered. So shed go back and try again. It was only after three or four tries, long after that first baby had died, that his fluorescent markers gave off the kind of light show he was looking for. Finally, the tissue was alive.

In a traditional transplant, an organ goes where the body normally grows it. But as she prepared to try out her carefully tended slices in a child for the first time, Markert asked an endocrine surgeon where might be the best place to implant them. He suggested the quadriceps, at the front of the thighs: It was easily accessible and chock full of blood vessels through which T-cells-to-be could arrive. In the operating room, the surgeon didnt even have to cut away muscle to make room for the thymus tissue; instead, he poked little troughs into the flesh, the way a gardener might in soil, and then seeded rows of thymus bits into the babys legs. Its like planting tulips, Markert said.

The change didnt happen immediately. The child was still vulnerable to infections for a while. But six months to a year after their first implantation, the team could tell that the patient had a working immune system. That meant that cells had left their home in the bone marrow and successfully finished schooling at this line of mini-thymuses in the childs thighs.

Its an amazing testament to her doggedness, Dr. Kathleen Sullivan, division chief of allergy and immunology at Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, who was not involved in the research, said of Markert. She built this up; she overturned paradigms. No one thought thymic transplantation would work.

The treatment didnt just work. It worked so well that there was an imbalance in supply and demand, so well enough that people went into debt.

Shaw remembers how scared she was when an immunologist who didnt know much about Markerts work explained Aunikas athymia. He basically said, Shes not going to make her first birthday, enjoy her while you can, Shaw recalled.

Hed mentioned some unproven procedure, though, and so Shaw found and contacted Markert herself, and then convinced Ontarios health ministry to cover the implantation. One Friday in the spring of 2017, the family got an unexpected call. It was Markert. She had a potential thymus for Aunika; could they be in North Carolina by Monday? They drove the 13 hours nonstop, in shifts. That thymus didnt seem healthy enough after all, but in July of that year, six thymuses later, Markerts team found one that worked. Now, Aunika is 3, and ready to start preschool next September.

Were still in debt, Shaw went on. One of her medications that she had to have was $900 every 10 days. That adds up. Even with the familys own fundraising and insurance coverage for the procedure itself, the parents had to take time off from their teaching jobs, and found themselves spending exorbitant amounts on the suction machines, IV poles, and feeding tubes required by their daughters complex medical problems. It was expensive just to keep her infection-free. I became a thief every time we went to the hospital. I was pocketing boxes of gloves, pocketing boxes of masks, Shaw said. Were all guilty of it, in our community.

Markerts program was in a similar kind of trouble. She said that even with external grants, because of government restrictions about billing for investigational products and the extensive follow-up her patients needed, her work was in a precarious state. Thank God for Enzyvant. You lose money doing this. I was going to run out of money in January 2017. We would have stopped thymus implants, she said. Thank goodness they were interested in helping this tiny group of patients.

Enzyvant licensed the technology and began paying for the work needed to seek FDA approval. (Markert and Duke have received royalties from the company.)

Financial considerations are part of the reason that families and physicians were so eagerly awaiting the official acceptance: The regulatory change would open the door to more insurers agreeing to cover the procedure, and would allow more hospitals to eventually start performing it. Enzyvant estimates that four out of five patients who need the procedure have been unable to get it while its still experimental.

Since now all 50 states are screening for T cell deficiency, the detection rate for congenital athymia has increased, and its becoming obvious that there are more of these babies being born than we realized, said Dr. Ivan Kinyue Chinn, assistant professor of pediatric allergy and immunology at Baylor College of Medicine.

But only two hospitals in the world have been doing this work Duke and Great Ormond Street Hospital, in London, where Markerts group taught their techniques to a team of specialists which creates a bottleneck in treating an illness that often presents a race against time. Even if you keep a child in isolation, visiting only in gowns and gloves, its hard to keep infection at bay.

Someone uses their gloved hand to push their glass up their nose and suddenly theres some germ on their hands it doesnt take much, Markert said.

Thats exactly what the Luckesens are worried about. For much of Katies pregnancy JD had been away, aboard the USS Princeton, cruising through Asia and the Middle East, the details of his travels classified. He got home the day before Charlie was born. We had one week of bliss, where everyone was home and happy and healthy, she said.

Then, the results of the newborn screening came in. They went to see an immunologist, who walked in wearing full isolation regalia; thats when Luckesen knew the problem was serious. One of the first things they said was: Stop breastfeeding immediately. It can be fatal to these kids, she said. They said it cant be powdered formula, it has to be liquid. So I go to BabiesRUs, Im buying those little newborn two-ounce bottles, Im just bawling walking around the store.

To protect Charlie, she pulled her older kids out of school and starting teaching them at home. In a sense, the whole family went into a kind of isolation. The oldest remembers the feeling of being in a real classroom, going to friends houses, touching the rough skin on a stingrays back at SeaWorld. Hes always asking when are we going to get to friends houses or when can we go to the zoo, she said.

Now, she doesnt know. She prays with her kids at dinnertime and at bedtime. They belong to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, though they havent been to a service since Charlie was diagnosed. Our church believes that families are forever, thats something that really helps us discussing with our kids if Charlie were to pass, she said.

Still, she is trying to keep her mind off the FDA decision so she doesnt get too angry. Everything is ready should Charlie get a chance at an operation. Their military benefits even include being flown privately from California to North Carolina. We cant take a commercial plane, because thats a germ box, she said. For Charlie, with no immune system, thats a death trap.

All theyre waiting on are these regulatory issues, a call from Duke, and a suitable piece of thymus.

See the article here:
Families reeling after FDA rejects therapy for kids without a thymus - STAT

Read More...

Bristol-Myers Squibb and bluebird bio Announce Positive Top-line Results from the Pivotal Phase 2 KarMMa Study of Ide-cel in Relapsed and Refractory…

Sunday, December 8th, 2019

DetailsCategory: DNA RNA and CellsPublished on Sunday, 08 December 2019 12:08Hits: 135

Study met its primary endpoint and key secondary endpoint, demonstrating deep and durable responses in a heavily pre-treated multiple myeloma patient population

Safety results are consistent with the data presented in CRB-401 study

PRINCETON, NJ & CAMBRIDGE, MA, USA I December 06, 2019 IBristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE: BMY) and bluebird bio, Inc. (Nasdaq: BLUE) today announced positive top-line results from KarMMa, a pivotal, open-label, single arm, multicenter, Phase 2 study of idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel; bb2121). KarMMa, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of the companies lead investigational BCMA-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy candidate for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, met its primary endpoint and key secondary endpoint.

KarMMa enrolled 140 patients, of whom 128 patients were treated with ide-cel across the target dose levels of 150-450 x 106 CAR+ T cells. All treated patients were exposed to at least three prior therapies, including an immunomodulatory (IMiD) agent, a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an anti-CD38 antibody, and all were refractory to their last regimen. Ninety-four percent of patients were refractory to an anti-CD38 antibody and 84% percent were triple refractory (refractory to an IMiD agent, PI and anti-CD38 antibody).

Results for the primary endpoint (overall response rate [ORR]) and key secondary endpoint (complete response rate [CR]), as well as duration of response (DoR) and progression-free survival (PFS) across the target dose levels and at each of the three target doses explored in the study are presented in the table below. The median follow-up duration for all subjects was 11.3 months.

Median DOR and median PFS are not reported for the 150 x 106 CAR+ T cells

dose group due to the small number of evaluable patients

Overall, the safety results were consistent with those observed in the phase 1 CRB-401 study, which evaluated the preliminary safety and efficacy of ide-cel. Instances of grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 5.5% (7/128) of patients, including one fatal CRS event. Investigator identified grade 3 or higher neurotoxicity events (iiNT) occurred in 3.1% (4/128) of patients and there were no Grade 4 iiNT events reported. Grade 3 or higher CRS and iiNT events were reported in <6% of subjects at each target dose. CRS of any grade occurred in 83.6% (107/128) of patients and iiNT of any grade occurred in 18% (23/128) of patients.

For multiple myeloma patients who have relapsed and become refractory to current treatment options, there remains a high unmet need, as these patients typically experience low response rates, short response durations and poor survival, said Kristen Hege, M.D., Senior Vice President, Hematology/Oncology and Cell Therapy, Early Clinical Development for Bristol-Myers Squibb. The KarMMa study provides further support for ide-cel as a potential therapeutic option in this heavily pre-treated patient population, and we are encouraged by these data, especially the outcomes observed at the highest target dose of 450 x 106 CAR+ T cells. We are actively preparing for submission of these data to Health Authorities for proposed initial registration of ide-cel as a first-in-class BCMA-targeted CAR T cell therapy.

Multiple myeloma is a relentless disease and there is significant need to find new treatment options for patients who advance through the current therapies available to them, said Joanne Smith-Farrell, Ph.D., oncology franchise lead and chief business officer, bluebird bio. With these data in hand, bluebird bio and Bristol-Myers Squibb remain fully focused on advancing ide-cel as quickly as possible for patients in late-line myeloma, while continuing to execute our broad development program to understand the potential benefits of ide-cel across earlier lines of therapy.

More comprehensive data from KarMMa will be submitted for presentation at a future medical meeting.

About KarMMa

KarMMa (NCT03361748) is a pivotal, open-label, single-arm, multi-center phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of ide-cel in adult patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, in North America and Europe. The primary endpoint of the study is overall response rate as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Complete response rate is a key secondary endpoint. Other efficacy endpoints include time to response, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival and minimal residual disease evaluated by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) assay. The study enrolled 140 patients, of whom 128 received ide-cel across the target dose levels of 150-450 x 106 CAR+ T cells after receiving lymphodepleting chemotherapy. All enrolled patients had received at least three prior treatment regimens, including an IMiD agent, a PI and an anti-CD38 antibody, and were refractory to their last regimen, defined as progression during or within 60 days of their last therapy.

About Ide-cel

Ide-cel is a CAR T cell therapy targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), which is expressed on the surface of normal and malignant plasma cells. The ide-cel CAR construct includes an anti-BCMA scFv-targeting domain for antigen specificity, a transmembrane domain, a CD3-zeta activation domain, and a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain hypothesized to increase T-cell activation, proliferation and persistence. Ide-cel CAR T cells are proposed to recognize and bind to BCMA on the surface of multiple myeloma cells leading to apoptosis.

In November 2017, ide-cel was granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation (BTD) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and PRIority Medicines (PRIME) eligibility by the European Medicines Agency based on preliminary clinical data from the phase 1 CRB-401 study.

Bristol-Myers Squibb and bluebird bios broad clinical development program for ide-cel includes clinical studies (KarMMa-2, KarMMa-3) in earlier lines of treatment for patients with multiple myeloma. For more information visit: clinicaltrials.gov.

Ide-cel is being developed as part of a Co-Development, Co-Promotion and Profit Share Agreement between BMS and bluebird bio.

Ide-cel is not approved for any indication in any geography.

Bristol-Myers Squibb: Advancing Cancer Research

At Bristol-Myers Squibb, patients are at the center of everything we do. The goal of our cancer research is to increase quality, long-term survival and make cure a possibility. We harness our deep scientific experience, cutting-edge technologies and discovery platforms to discover, develop and deliver novel treatments for patients.

Building upon our transformative work and legacy in hematology and Immuno-Oncology that has changed survival expectations for many cancers, our researchers are advancing a deep and diverse pipeline across multiple modalities. In the field of immune cell therapy, this includes registrational chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell agents for numerous diseases, and a growing early-stage pipeline that expands cell and gene therapy targets, and technologies. We are developing cancer treatments directed at key biological pathways using our protein homeostasis platform, a research capability that has been the basis of our approved therapies for multiple myeloma and several promising compounds in early to mid-stage development. Our scientists are targeting different immune system pathways to address interactions between tumors, the microenvironment and the immune system to further expand upon the progress we have made and help more patients respond to treatment. Combining these approaches is key to delivering new options for the treatment of cancer and addressing the growing issue of resistance to immunotherapy. We source innovation internally, and in collaboration with academia, government, advocacy groups and biotechnology companies, to help make the promise of transformational medicines a reality for patients.

About Bristol-Myers Squibb

Bristol-Myers Squibb is a global biopharmaceutical company whose mission is to discover, develop and deliver innovative medicines that help patients prevail over serious diseases. For more information about Bristol-Myers Squibb, visit us at BMS.com or follow us on LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube, Facebook and Instagram.

About bluebird bio, Inc.

bluebird bio is pioneering gene therapy with purpose. From our Cambridge, Mass., headquarters, were developing gene therapies for severe genetic diseases and cancer, with the goal that people facing potentially fatal conditions with limited treatment options can live their lives fully. Beyond our labs, were working to positively disrupt the healthcare system to create access, transparency and education so that gene therapy can become available to all those who can benefit.

bluebird bio is a human company powered by human stories. Were putting our care and expertise to work across a spectrum of disorders by researching cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy, sickle cell disease, -thalassemia and multiple myeloma using three gene therapy technologies: gene addition, cell therapy and (megaTAL-enabled) gene editing.

bluebird bio has additional nests in Seattle, Wash.; Durham, N.C.; and Zug, Switzerland. For more information, visit bluebirdbio.com.

SOURCE: Bristol-Myers Squibb

See the original post here:
Bristol-Myers Squibb and bluebird bio Announce Positive Top-line Results from the Pivotal Phase 2 KarMMa Study of Ide-cel in Relapsed and Refractory...

Read More...

Should HIV-Positive Babies Start Drug Treatment Shortly After Birth? : Goats and Soda – NPR

Sunday, December 8th, 2019

Babies in their cribs at Lambano Sanctuary, a hospice for orphaned children with HIV in Gauteng, South Africa. Andrew Aitchison/Pictures Ltd./Corbis/Getty Images hide caption

Babies in their cribs at Lambano Sanctuary, a hospice for orphaned children with HIV in Gauteng, South Africa.

Every day, as many as 500 babies in sub-Saharan Africa are born with HIV. Standard practice in many of these countries is to give them treatment if they test positive, but not for weeks or even months after they're born. The concern is that newborns can't tolerate the powerful drugs.

In the last few years, researchers have suspected that treating right at birth is better. Dr. Deborah Persaud, a virologist at Johns Hopkins Children's Center, co-wrote a paper six years ago about a baby girl in Mississippi with HIV who was treated 30 hours after birth.

"That baby was known to be infected and went off drugs," she says. At 18 months, the girl's family took her off antiretroviral drugs. For infected individuals who stop treatment, it usually takes two to four weeks for the virus to resurge, but "for 27 months, there were no signs of HIV." The girl later relapsed and went back on antiretroviral drugs around age 4.

Still, doctors thought the "Mississippi baby's" two years of drug-free healthy living were the result of getting treatment so early. Since then, it has become standard practice in the U.S. to treat babies at high risk of being born with HIV soon after birth but doctors think more clinical evidence is needed that the treatment can be safe and more effective than delaying treatment.

Now, results from a clinical trial in Botswana support that hunch. In Science Translational Medicine, researchers report on 10 HIV-positive babies who were started on a drinkable three-drug cocktail of conventional antiretrovirals within their first days. After they had two years of antiretroviral drugs, the virus was almost undetectable in their bodies. By contrast, kids who started antiretroviral therapy a few months after birth had 200 times more virus in their blood.

Daniel Kuritzkes, a study co-author and chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, says the early-treated kids aren't cured yet, "but it's likely that we may have set them up for the possibility of long-term remission of their HIV."

Kuritzkes thinks there are two main reasons that treating so early is helpful. First, in people of any age, treating as soon as someone becomes infected helps keep the virus from taking firm hold in their bodies. And second, in babies, their immune system is just beginning to develop.

"By intervening very early, we're able to protect the immune system much more effectively from any damage from HIV," he says.

Kuritzkes says his study adds evidence that very early treatment is safe and tolerated well by babies.

Persaud, who was not involved in the Botswana study, says that when HIV first infects someone, it establishes itself in certain cells where it can hide out for years. Current HIV drugs can't get at these reservoirs. Very early treatment, which prevents the virus from replicating when babies' immune systems are just developing, seems to work by keeping the hidden stock of HIV very small.

The Botswana trial is one of three major ongoing clinical trials looking at very early treatment of HIV in infants and the first to publish some results, says Ted Ruel, an infectious disease pediatrician at UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital. A second study is ongoing in South Africa, and a third, called the P1115 study (which Ruel and Persaud are both involved with), has multiple sites around the world, including in Brazil, India and Thailand. The ultimate goal of this work, Ruel says, "is to get it so that people with HIV can forget about it, so they can not [have to] take medicine every day and not worry about infecting other people and not feel any side effects from it."

According to Kuritzkes, the next step in the Botswana trial is to introduce an experimental treatment using broadly neutralizing antibodies, which have been promising in adults, to children.

"The idea is to replace daily or twice daily oral dosing with antibody infusions that might be administered every three months or less frequently," he wrote in an email. Persaud says that the P1115 study plans, with the consent of the families, to stop antiretroviral treatment in healthy-seeming children and to see if their bodies will continue to suppress the virus on their own.

While treating HIV very early looks promising, one of the biggest hurdles will be getting drugs to babies who need them.

"You really need the kind of infrastructure that exists in Botswana or in a country like the United States in order to be able to identify and rapidly intervene in these children," says Kuritzkes. Faced with one of the world's highest HIV rates, Botswana developed a nationwide treatment plan the first in eastern and southern Africa to give free access to HIV drugs for anyone who needs them.

Last year, 160,000 kids worldwide were infected with HIV through pregnancy, birth or breastfeeding. Almost 90% of them live in sub-Saharan Africa, and half of them don't have access to antiretroviral drugs. Obstacles to treatment abound. The parents might not know their children have HIV, the drugs can be hard to get or there's often stigma around being an HIV carrier in their communities.

Researchers involved in these studies agree that preventing kids from getting HIV in the first place is key. But for those who fall through the cracks, they say that giving treatment very early offers a second chance for good health.

Read more from the original source:
Should HIV-Positive Babies Start Drug Treatment Shortly After Birth? : Goats and Soda - NPR

Read More...

Protein tag developed to aid in study of the immune system – Drug Target Review

Monday, December 2nd, 2019

A novel approach to better understand a basic defence mechanism of the immune system has been developed using the ISG15 protein which could lead to novel antimicrobial drugs.

A novel approach has been developed using ISG15 (a small protein with a role in the immune system) to better understand a basic defence mechanism of the immune system. This means proteins tagged with ISG15 can now be identified and studied, allowing scientists to unravel its many functions in fighting disease, potentially leading to novel antimicrobial drugs.

The method was developed by scientists from VIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, University of Iowa, US and other collaborators.

To keep control of expressed proteins, cells can attach a chemical tag onto a protein to modify its activity. One of the most well-known protein modifications is ubiquitin, which has various functions.

The scientists in this study investigated an ubiquitin-like modification called ISG15 which can be attached to target proteins. However, the molecular function of ISG15 is elusive, since the identity of the modified proteins and their exact sites of modification are still unknown.

ISG15 and ubiquitin share the same amino acid sequence at their end, exactly where these modifiers are attached to target proteins, said Francis Impens at the VIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology. As a result, the peptides derived from the proteins modified by ISG15 display the same tag as peptides derived from proteins modified by ubiquitin. So, we took advantage of the technology developed to identify ubiquitin modification sites for the identification of ISG15 modification sites.

We took advantage of the technology developed to identify ubiquitin modification sites for the identification of ISG15 modification sites

ISG15 is only expressed upon stresses such as a viral or bacterial infection so the scientists had to complement their approach with an infection model.

As infection model, we chose the bug Listeria monocytogenes, said Fabien Thery, co-first author of the study. Leading to the old French cheese disease, Listeria is a food-borne bacterial pathogen hiding from the immune system inside host cells.

This has led to the discovery of nearly a thousand ISG15 sites on more than four hundred protein targets during bacterial infection.

We found that ISG15 targets numerous enzymes involved in metabolic processes, but also that it targets key regulators of autophagy, a process in response to a lack of nutrients inside a cell, added Lilliana Radoshevich, PhD, University of Iowa. It leads to the destruction of cellular components to generate new sources of energy and promote cell survival. Alternatively, autophagy can be used as an antibacterial strategy.

This work revealed a new link between ISG15, cellular metabolism and autophagy. The scientists have already started to use their approach to investigate ISG15 targets during infection with other pathogens such as the Influenza virus or Coxsackie virus. These studies may reveal antimicrobial pathways of the immune system that can be exploited to design new drugs, the scientists have said.

The study appeared in Nature Communications.

Here is the original post:
Protein tag developed to aid in study of the immune system - Drug Target Review

Read More...

Stem cells may trigger immune repair to mend hearts – BioNews

Monday, December 2nd, 2019

2 December 2019

Stem cell therapies may become redundant in repairing cardiac function after a heart attack, suggests a new study in mice.

It showed how stem cell treatments can heal hearts by triggering an immune response which can be achieved by using a chemical instead.

'This work is paradigm-shifting because it demonstrates a mechanism to explain a perplexing phenomenon that has intrigued cardiologists as a result of decades of cardiac stem cell trials,' Dr Jonathan Epstein at the University of Pennsylvania's Perelman School of Medicine in Philadelphia told The Scientist.

Stem cell therapies to repair damaged heart tissue are currently being tested in human clinical trials. In these treatments, human stem cells are injected into the heart and this leads to an improvement in heart function. However, how this works is not fully understood.

One possibility is that the injected stem cells are incorporated into the heart tissue and repair the damage. However, the latest study, published in the journal Nature, suggests that this may not be the case. Instead, the study indicated that the repair is actually a result of triggering the innate immune response.

Researchers injected different types of stem cell or a chemical inducer (zymosan) of the innate immune response into an experimental mouse model of heart disease. They saw improvement in heart function that was similar in all cases, and showed that this repair occurs via activation of macrophage cells of the innate immune system.

'The innate immune response acutely altered cellular activity around the injured area of the heart so that it healed with a more optimised scar and improved contractile properties,' said Dr Jeffery Molkentin at the University of Cincinnati and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Centre, Ohio, who led the study. 'The implications of our study are very straightforward and present important new evidence about an unsettled debate in the field of cardiovascular medicine.'

The work could open up new possibilities for optimising the treatments currently in development, as well as alternative new therapies.

'If there is a chemical off-the-shelf, it would be a much more feasible therapy [than stem cell transplants],'Dr Kory Lavine at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, told Nature News.

Read the original post:
Stem cells may trigger immune repair to mend hearts - BioNews

Read More...

Can the keto diet help beat the flu? – Medical News Today

Monday, December 2nd, 2019

Results of a new study in mice suggest that the body may be able to defeat the influenza virus if a person has the right sort of diet a ketogenic, or keto, diet.

Infection with the influenza virus, better known as the flu, has accounted for 12,00061,000 deaths every year since 2010 in the United States, with an annual economic burden of $87.1 billion.

The introduction of the flu vaccine has greatly improved infection and morbidity rates. However, there is still currently no cure for the illness.

Healthcare professionals and scientists alike are continuing the search for novel therapeutics to combat the flu, yet the key may lie within the body's own immune system. Moreover, it may be activated by the keto diet.

Following the keto diet involves eating foods that are high in fat and low in carbohydrates. Meals tend to consist of a variety of meat, fish, poultry, and non-starchy vegetables.

According to the findings of a new study, appearing in the journal Science Immunology, when mice fed a keto diet were injected with the flu virus, their survival rates were much higher than those of mice fed a diet high in carbohydrates.

The main reason for this, the researchers believe, is that a keto diet blocks the formation of inflammasomes, which are multiunit protein complexes that the immune system activates.

Inflammasomes can also cause harmful immune system responses in the host. This triggers the release of gamma delta T cells.

Gamma delta T cells are responsible for producing mucus in the linings of the lungs, which helps the body get rid of infectious agents. The mucus is then wafted up the airways and coughed out.

The joint senior authors of the study are Prof. Akiko Iwasaki and Prof. Vishwa Deep Dixit, both of the department of immunobiology at the Yale School of Medicine, in New Haven, CT.

The objective of the study was to determine how the keto diet affects host defense against a lethal flu virus infection.

The researchers randomly assigned the mice to diet groups 1 week before they induced the infection. Next, they monitored the rodents for signs of infection and assessed their immune responses.

The team found that keto diet feeding confers protection against the flu virus in mice by increasing the number of gamma delta T cells in the airways.

This response occurred relatively late after the infection in the mice, due to their dependence on T cell receptors on other cells. But in humans, this response is much quicker, as gamma delta T cells can expand independently.

In addition, previous research in mice has shown that a specific subset of gamma delta T cells can efficiently induce the cytolytic killing of flu-infected airway cells.

In the current study, the expansion of gamma delta T cells resulted in lower viral titer measurements in the mice that had received a ketogenic diet.

The team also investigated the potential for changes in the levels of genetic activity using RNA sequencing, a technique that can measure the levels of transcription across the genome.

This showed that although a keto diet could impact the expansion of gamma delta T cells, this was not associated with any changes in the activity of genes involved with cytotoxicity.

Interestingly, when mice were bred without the gene that encodes for gamma delta T cells, the keto diet provided no protection against the flu virus.

Commenting on this result, Prof. Iwasaki says, "This was a totally unexpected finding."

"This study shows that the way the body burns fat to produce ketone bodies from the food we eat can fuel the immune system to fight flu infection."

Prof. Vishwa Deep Dixit

How do gamma delta T cells protect the host in response to a keto diet? As the researchers report, the current theory is that the expansion of these cells in response to ketogenic feeding leads to more efficient killing of the flu virus.

This, in turn, results in much lower viral titers and better preservation of the cells lining the airways.

Experts believe that the gamma delta T cells induced by the keto diet may enhance the barrier and innate defense systems of airway-lining cells at baseline, thereby allowing for a better response to the flu virus.

These results demonstrate that the answer to combatting the flu virus does not necessarily lie in producing drugs to relieve flu symptoms and that changing the diet can have a dramatic effect on how the body responds to infection.

The results also suggest that if the flu can be tackled in this way, there is the potential for changes in diet to help the body more effectively fight other viral infections.

This type of research is in its infancy, and much more will be needed to elucidate exactly how the keto diet may help combat the flu.

Read more:
Can the keto diet help beat the flu? - Medical News Today

Read More...

IFM Therapeutics Announces $55.5 Million Financing to Launch and Fund New Subsidiaries and Appointment of Dr. H. Martin Seidel as Chief Executive…

Monday, December 2nd, 2019

BOSTON, Dec. 2, 2019 /PRNewswire/ --IFM Therapeutics (IFM), a privately-held biopharmaceutical company focused on developing therapies that modulate novel targets in the innate immune system, today announced the closing of a $55.5 million financing and the launch of its third subsidiary, IFM Quattro, as well as a new incubator, IFM Discovery, both of which will be supported by a portion of the new funds raised. IFM Quattro and IFM Discovery will focus on developing next-generation small molecule immunotherapies for inflammatory diseases and cancers. The financing was led by new investor Omega Funds, with participation from existing investors Atlas Venture and Abingworth. In conjunction with the financing, Paulina Hill of Omega Funds will join Jean-Franois Formela of Atlas Venture and Shelley Chu of Abingworth on the IFM Discovery and IFM Quattro Boards of Directors.

Under the terms of the financing agreement, IFM Discovery will work on a range of targets within the innate immune system. The first target-specific program to advance to early preclinical development will be housed in the IFM Quattro subsidiary. IFM Discovery will continue to focus on additional targets to support the launch of future IFM program-specific subsidiary companies, up to two of which will be funded by the financing announced today.

In addition, IFM announced the transition of Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder Gary D. Glick, Ph.D., into the role of Executive Chairman of the Board. Effective today, IFM's Executive Vice President of Research and Development, H. Martin Seidel, Ph.D., has been named Chief Executive Officer and appointed to the Company's Board of Directors.

"The closing of IFM's new financing round and the establishment of IFM Quattro and IFM Discovery reflect our steadfast belief in the innate immune system as a prolific therapeutic target that offers numerous attractive drug discovery opportunities across therapeutic areas," said Dr. Gary D. Glick, Co-Founder and Executive Chairman of IFM. "We are grateful for the support of both new and existing investors, which will enable our team to continue rapidly discovering small molecule therapies, while executing on our corporate strategy of housing each distinct program in a dedicated subsidiary."

Dr. Glick continued, "It has been an immense privilege to build and lead IFM since its founding. Having known and worked with Martin closely for many years and seen his contributions to IFM, I am confident that he is the right person to build on the culture we have established and lead the Company through its next stage of growth. Martin is an experienced leader, with the ability to define a development strategy for a portfolio that covers diverse therapeutic areas and leverage the various tools at his disposal to most efficiently advance each program forward. I look forward to working closely with him in my new role as Executive Chairman."

Dr. Seidel joined IFM full-time in 2017, as Executive Vice President of Research and Development after having served as a Board Observer since 2016. In this role, he has been responsible for developing, expanding and overseeing IFM's pipeline. Prior to joining IFM, Dr. Seidel served as the Global Head of Strategic Alliances for the Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research (NIBR), where he led a team responsible for creating collaborations with external partners to help advance NIBR's mission. In that role, he and his team executed more than 70 deals, including in-licenses, out-licenses, collaborations, acquisitions and equity investments. Dr. Seidel first became involved with IFM as a Board Observer following Novartis' investment in IFM's Series A financing.

Prior to that, Dr. Seidel was the head of NIBR's Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, where he helped advance more than 40 clinical candidates, among them four FDA-approved drugs. He has served as a Board Observer with Luc/Cadent Therapeutics, Surface Oncology, Raze Therapeutics, Arcus Biosciences, Intellia Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences. Dr. Seidel received his Ph.D. in Chemistry from Harvard University and his A.B. in Chemistry from Princeton University. He also completed a one-year DAAD fellowship at the Friedrich-Alexander Universitt Erlangen-Nrnberg.

Dr. Seidel commented, "I am excited to become IFM's next CEO, and to work alongside Gary, the Board and our leadership team as we continue to execute on our mission of transforming immune regulation to improve the lives of patients with serious diseases. It has become increasingly clear that overactivity of the innate immune system underlies a host of serious inflammatory and autoimmune conditions and that, conversely, precise activation of innate immunity can jumpstart immune responses to cancer. As an industry, we've only begun to scratch the surface of attractive targets in the innate immune system, an area that IFM is particularly well positioned to exploit. Going forward, we will continue to prosecute these targets with rigor to develop novel compounds and launch dedicated, independently-financed subsidiaries for each program as we identify opportunities of interest."

Joining the IFM Quattro and IFM Discovery Boards of Directors will be Paulina Hill, Ph.D., of Omega Funds. "At Omega Funds, we seek to partner with exceptional management teams and work collaboratively with co-investors to bring promising therapies to patients with significant unmet medical needs," said Dr. Hill. "We feel we have found an optimal combination of all these factors in this partnership with the IFM Therapeutics team. We are thrilled to join the IFM Quattro and IFM Discovery boards, as we work together to advance our shared vision."

About IFM Therapeutics, LLCIFM Therapeutics (IFM) is a privately-held biopharmaceutical company based in Boston, Massachusetts. The Company was founded by an international group of preeminent scientists and physicians following the sale of IFM Therapeutics, Inc. (originally founded by Gary D. Glick and Atlas Venture) to Bristol-Myers Squibb. IFM's team has discovered and developed small molecules that modulate novel targets in the innate immune system as next-generation therapies for cancer, auto-immunity, and inflammatory disorders. IFM places each program (or set of related programs) in its own dedicated, independently financed, R&D-focused subsidiary company, which is supported by the common infrastructure, management team and resources of the IFM enterprise. For more information on IFM and its model, please visithttps://www.ifmthera.com.

View original content to download multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ifm-therapeutics-announces-55-5-million-financing-to-launch-and-fund-new-subsidiaries-and-appointment-of-dr-h-martin-seidel-as-chief-executive-officer-300967030.html

SOURCE IFM Therapeutics, LLC

See the article here:
IFM Therapeutics Announces $55.5 Million Financing to Launch and Fund New Subsidiaries and Appointment of Dr. H. Martin Seidel as Chief Executive...

Read More...

Page 43«..1020..42434445..50..»


2024 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick