header logo image


Page 18«..10..17181920..3040..»

Archive for August, 2016

Integrative Medicine | UCHealth

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

University of Colorado Health offers physician-managed care that emphasizes the wellness and healing of the entire person.

Integrative medicine is the blending of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) therapies with conventional care for the prevention and treatment of health conditions and the pursuit of wellness.

This melding of traditional medical care with the centuries-old healing arts can help decrease stress, strengthen the immune system, reduce pain, and speed recovery.

Our holistic approach treats each patient for balance and wellness of the mind, body, and spirit. Services are customized for your unique needs.

We believe that wellness is not defined by the presenceor absenceof disease. Rather, wellness is the pursuit of the best quality of life in your present circumstances regardless of your medical condition.

Whether youre fighting a disease, recovering from a disease, or striving to maintain good health, we can help you achieve optimal well-being.

Our integrative medicine team collaborates with each other, your other healthcare providers at UCHealth, and any outside providers to help you get the most from the integration of CAM and conventional care.

Read more here:
Integrative Medicine | UCHealth

Read More...

Integrative Medicine | RSC Bay Area

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

By Dr. Carmelo Sgarlata

My journey into integrative medicine began in 2009 when my wife, Carole Cook, MD, an OB/GYN, began her fellowship in the relatively new field of integrative medicine. While I had a good understanding of the practice and its conceptual framework, the more my wife shared her experience, the more I grew to appreciate the potential influence it could have on my practice of fertility science.

Following my wifes lead, I began a two-year fellowship through the Arizona Center for Integrative Medicine. The program is dedicated to teaching physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants the art and science of integrative medicine. In October of 2013, I became the first reproductive endocrinologist in the United States to complete this program.

The center, founded in 1994 by internationally renowned Dr. Andrew Weil, was built on the premise that the best way to change a field is to educate the most gifted professionals and place them in settings where they can, in turn, teach others. It is my goal to implement integrative medicine into the Reproductive Science Center of the Bay Area.

In creating this web site, I hope that readers will have better understanding of what exactly integrative medicine is, how we are applying it at RSC and what, specifically, integrative medicine can do for patients in their journey towards fertility.

Please visit our integrative medicine blogs section and follow me on Twitter for current information on fertility, integrative medicine and womens health topics.

I also sit on the advisory board forTheralogixnutritional science. Theralogix sets the standard for evidence-based nutritional supplements, trusted by physicians.

Learn More About Theralogix

He serves as a member of the Society for Reproductive Endocrinologists, the Society of Reproductive Surgeons and American Society for Reproductive Medicine. He is a founding member and past President of the Bay Area Reproductive Endocrinologist Society.

Link:
Integrative Medicine | RSC Bay Area

Read More...

Integrative Medicine – IM Health

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

Integrative Medicine The Best of Both Worlds IM Health strives to bring patients the best of both worlds, utilizing both Western medicine, andComplementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) modalitieswith evidence-based effectiveness to optimize patient outcomes.

Harvard trained physician, Dr. Andrew Weil MD, presents the benefits of integrating conventional Western medicine and CAMmodalities.

Integrative medicine seeks to refocus treatment of disease on health and healing, and away from disease symptom management. IM Health programs successfully achieve the goals of this intelligent combination of conventional and alternative medicine.

This approachemphasizes whole person medicine where we are about more than just the physical body instead we are minds, spirits, and community members. Emphasis is placed on all aspects of lifestyle, as well as the importance of the practitioner-patient relationship to the healing practice. A conscious effort is made to incorporate all effective methods of treatment from all traditions that is the alternative piece.

The 6 principles of every integrative medicine strategy are:

1. A use of natural and less-invasive treatment whenever possible first do no harm

2. An effective working partnership between patient and practioner

3. A blend of conventional and holistic treatments

4. A thorough consideration of all factors that influence health, wellness and disease (mind, spirit, body and community) throughout treatment

5. A recognition that good medicine should be open to new (or ancient) paradigms of healing

6. A proactive promotion of health and wellness, in conjunction with treatment of disease

Learn About the Evidence & Research

View post:
Integrative Medicine - IM Health

Read More...

Miami Stem Cell Treatment Center

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

The Advancement of Stem Cell Technology

At the Miami Stem Cell Treatment Center we provide consultation relating to clinical research and deployment of stem cell therapy for patients suffering from diseases that may have limited treatment options. Stem cell therapy is not for everyone but under the right circumstances and under the right conditions there may be an opportunity for stem cell therapy to be effective. But stem cell therapy is not, at present time, is not the holy grail we all would like it to be.

Our expertise involves a deep commitment and long-term understanding, knowledge and experience in clinical research and the advancement of regenerative medicine.

We firmly support respected guidance regarding stem cell therapy indicating that it should be autologous, include ONLY minimal manipulation of regenerative cells, and be consistent with homologous use.

We do NOT advise the addition of chemicals or enzymes to produce the stromal vascular fraction (SVF).

We believe that treatment protocols ought to be reviewed and approved by an IRB (Institutional Review Board) which is registered with the U.S. Department of Health, Office of Human Research Protection (OHRP) or United States F.D.A, or both.

Because we are committed to the principles and ideals of regenerative medicine, we are continuously updating, researching, and learning more on how to help patients and advance the state of the art of regenerative medicine. Accordingly we provide all patients who are interested in considering stem cell therapy an honest opinion as to the potential benefits and risks of stem cell therapy for their presenting condition.

At the Miami Stem Cell Treatment Center we will review your medical records and condition, and then consider an array of ongoing IRB-approved protocols, registered with Clnicaltrials.gov, a service of the National Institute of Health and the National Library of Congress, to provide patients with a wide variety of treatment options and considerations for medical disorders that may benefit from adult stem cell-based regenerative therapy.

See the article here:
Miami Stem Cell Treatment Center

Read More...

Blindness – Kids Health:

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

Have you ever put on a blindfold and pretended that you couldn't see? You probably bumped into things and got confused about which way you were going. But if you had to, you could get adjusted and learn to live without your sight.

Lots of people have done just that. They have found ways to learn, play, and work, even though they have trouble seeing or can't see at all.

Your eyes and your brain work together to see. The eye is made up of many different parts, including the cornea, iris, lens, and retina. These parts all work together to focus on light and images. Your eyes then use special nerves to send what you see to your brain, so your brain can process and recognize what you're seeing. In eyes that work correctly, this process happens almost instantly.

When this doesn't work the way it should, a person may be visually impaired, or blind. The problem may affect one eye or both eyes.

When you think of being blind, you might imagine total darkness. But most people who are blind can still see a little light or shadows. They just can't see things clearly. People who have some sight, but still need a lot of help, are sometimes called "legally blind."

Vision problems can develop before a baby is born. Sometimes, parts of the eyes don't form the way they should. A kid's eyes might look fine, but the brain has trouble processing the information they send. The optic nerve sends pictures to the brain, so if the nerve doesn't form correctly, the baby's brain won't receive the messages needed for sight.

Blindness can be genetic (or inherited), which means that this problem gets passed down to a kid from parents through genes.

Blindness also can be caused by an accident, if something hurts the eye. That's why it's so important to protect your eyes when you play certain sports, such as hockey.

Some illnesses, such as diabetes, can damage a person's vision over time. Other eye diseases, such as cataracts (say: KAH-tuh-rakts), can cause vision problems or blindness, but they usually affect older people.

Read the original here:
Blindness - Kids Health:

Read More...

Phenethyl isothiocyanate upregulates death … – BMC Cancer

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

Research article

Open Access

BMC Cancer201414:591

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-591

Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.2014

Received: 21April2014

Accepted: 11August2014

Published: 15August2014

The cytokine TRAIL (tumor necrotic factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand) selectively induces apoptosis in cancer cells, but cancer stem cells (CSCs) that contribute to cancer-recurrence are frequently TRAIL-resistant. Here we examined hitherto unknown effects of the dietary anti-carcinogenic compound phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) on attenuation of proliferation and tumorigenicity and on up regulation of death receptors and apoptosis in human cervical CSC.

Cancer stem-like cells were enriched from human cervical HeLa cell line by sphere-culture method and were characterized by CSC-specific markers analyses (flow cytometry) and Hoechst staining. Cell proliferation assays, immunoblotting, and flow cytometry were used to assess anti-proliferative as well as pro-apoptotic effects of PEITC exposure in HeLa CSCs (hCSCs). Xenotransplantation study in a non-obese diabetic, severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mouse model, histopathology, and ELISA techniques were further utilized to validate our results in vivo.

PEITC attenuated proliferation of CD44high/+/CD24low/, stem-like, sphere-forming subpopulations of hCSCs in a concentration- and time-dependent manner that was comparable to the CSC antagonist salinomycin. PEITC exposure-associated up-regulation of cPARP (apoptosis-associated cleaved poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase) levels and induction of DR4 and DR5 (death receptor 4 and 5) of TRAIL signaling were observed. Xenotransplantation of hCSCs into mice resulted in greater tumorigenicity than HeLa cells, which was diminished along with serum hVEGF-A (human vascular endothelial growth factor A) levels in the PEITC-pretreated hCSC group. Lung metastasis was observed only in the hCSC-injected group that did not receive PEITC-pretreatment.

The anti-proliferative effects of PEITC in hCSCs may at least partially result from up regulation of DR4 and possibly DR5 of TRAIL-mediated apoptotic pathways. PEITC may offer a novel approach for improving therapeutic outcomes in cancer patients.

Despite considerable improvement in cancer diagnosis and therapy, relapse and metastasis are still common [1]. However, the rise of the cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis provides a new approach to eradicating malignancies. Recent studies have shown that CSCs are a small subpopulation of tumor cells that possess self-renewal and tumor-initiation capacity and the ability to give rise to the heterogeneous lineages of malignant cells that comprise a tumor [2]. CSCs have been identified in hematologic and solid cancers and implicated in tumor initiation, development, metastasis, and recurrence. Although the origin(s) and dynamic heterogeneity of CSCs remain unexplained, designing novel approaches to target CSCs has received much attention over the past several years [35].

Phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) is a dietary compound derived from common vegetables such as watercress, broccoli, cabbage, and cauliflower [6]. We and others have shown under experimental conditions that PEITC possesses anti-inflammatory [7, 8] and chemopreventive activity against various cancers, including colon [9], prostate [10], breast [11], cervical [12, 13], ovarian [14], and pancreatic cancer [15]. Safety studies in rats and dogs have shown that PEITC has no apparent toxicity, even when administered in high doses, as determined by NOEL (no-observed-adverse-effect-level) [16], and PEITC is currently in clinical trials in the US for lung cancer (NCT00691132). Cervical cancer is the second-most-fatal cancer in women worldwide, and the incidence rate is significantly higher in developing nations due to the absence of rigorous screening programs [17]. A recent study showed that PEITC can induce the extrinsic apoptosis pathway in a human cervical cancer cell line [12]. However, the chemotherapeutic effects of PEITC in the context of CSCs and more specifically cervical CSCs remain unknown.

Apoptosis, or programmed cell-death, is essential to maintaining tissue homeostasis, and its impairment is implicated in many human diseases, including cancers [18]. The tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a member of the tumor necrosis factor super-family, has attracted great interest for clinical applications due to its specific anti-tumor potential without toxic side effects to normal healthy cells [19, 20]. There are two well-characterized apoptosis pathways in mammalian cells. The extrinsic pathway is mediated by death receptors, a subgroup of the TNF receptor superfamily. TRAIL binds to TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2, two death domain-containing receptors, also called DR4 and DR5, to trigger apoptosis. The intrinsic pathway involves mitochondria, and is triggered and controlled by members of the Bcl-2 protein family. Both pathways cause the activation of initiator caspases, which then activate effector caspases [21]. Caspases cause cleavage and inactivation of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP)-1, which helps repair single-stranded DNA breaks, and hence PARP-1 cleavage serves as a hallmark of apoptosis [22]. Unfortunately, a variety of human tumors develop resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis [23]. But further studies have suggested that TRAIL activity can be sensitized with other chemotherapeutic drugs, such as paclitaxel [24], 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) [25], and cisplatin [26] or dietary bioactive compounds like benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) [27] or sulforaphane [28, 29]. However, the effects of PEITC on TRAIL pathway in CSCs have not been reported.

In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of PEITC in attenuating the growth of sphere-forming cervical CSCs isolated from HeLa cells (hCSCs) as well as its ability to up regulate death receptors for TRAIL-mediated induction of apoptosis. Furthermore, the in vivo anti-tumorigenicity effects of PEITC were evaluated in a xenograft mouse model.

Phenethyl isothiocyanate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), 99%, was diluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to make 0.520-mM stock concentrations and was further diluted in media to obtain 2.520-M final concentrations, which are achievable following oral administration in human [30] and have been used in prior studies by us and others to induce apoptosis in the SW480 colon cancer cell line [9] and cervical cancer cell lines. We used comparable concentrations of salinomycin (2.520M) and lower concentrations (2.520 nM) of paclitaxel (both from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) as positive controls, which are CSC-targeted and CSC-non-specific anti-cancer chemotherapeutics, respectively, following Gupta et al. [31]. For the negative/vehicle control samples, we used DMSO in an amount equivalent to that used with test compounds in test samples.

The human HeLa cell line (ATCC CCL-2, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) was cultured and maintained in a T-25 flask with Dulbeccos modified eagles medium (DMEM) containing 4mML-glutamine and 4.5g/L glucose (HyClone, Logan, UT), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) and 1% penicillin (25 U/ml)/streptomycin (25g/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in a 5% CO2-humidified atmosphere at 37C. HeLa cells were trypsinized with TrypLE (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) and then sub-cultured with a 1:5 splitting ratio when the cells reached about 90% confluency. From the parental HeLa cells (termed simply as HeLa in the rest of the document), hCSCs were cultured following a modified protocol described by Gu et al. [5]. Briefly, single-cell suspensions of HeLa cells (4104) were seeded into a 100-mm ultra-low attachment (ULA) petri dish (Corning Inc., Corning, NY) containing 8ml of serum-free mammary epithelial basal medium (MEBM, Lonza, Allendale, NJ), supplemented with 1 B27 (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY), 4g/ml heparin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), 20ng/ml hEGF, and 20ng/ml hFGF (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY). After an initial 4-day culture in suspension at 37C, an additional 9ml of sphere culture medium was added for another 5days of culture. On day 9, spheres were harvested by centrifugation at 500 g for 3minutes, followed by washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), trypsinization with TrypLE for 10minutes at 37C, centrifugation at 500 g for 3minutes, resuspension in 5ml of hCSC culture medium, and counting with a hemocytometer. Both HeLa cells and hCSCs were used for successive experiments.

Around 2106 HeLa cells were seeded into a 60-mm petri dish and incubated overnight at 37C. Cells were washed with 2ml of PBS, trypsinized with 1ml of TrypLE, and resuspended in 1ml of PBS, followed by immunostaining. Similarly, hCSCs were collected after 9days of culture, trypsinized, and resuspended in 2ml of PBS with a density of 1106 cells/ml, followed by immunostaining. Cells were immunostained with anti-CD24FITC (1:500v/v, Millipore, Billerica, MA) or anti-CD44FITC (1:500v/v, Millipore, Billerica, MA) antibodies for 1hour at room temperature. Immunofluorescence was measured using a FACSCalibur cell analyzer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) with approximately 10,000 events in each sample. Propidium iodide/annexin V staining was performed according to the manufacturers instructions. Briefly, 5105 cells were centrifuged and resuspended in 100l of 1x binding buffer (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY). The cells were treated with 10M PEITC or vector control (DMSO) for a total of 24h, in the last hour of which 10ng/ml of human recombinant TRAIL (eBioscience, Inc., San Diego, CA) or vector control (DMEM) were added to the cells before harvesting. The cells were then incubated with 5l of annexin VFITC (eBioscience, Inc., San Diego, CA) and 5l of propidium iodide (eBioscience, Inc., San Diego, CA) at room temperature for 5minutes in the dark before analyzing the cells on a FACSCalibur cell analyzer. For DR4 and DR5 expression analysis, 5105 cells were filtered through a filter cap (35m) into a collecting tube (BD Falcon, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and then washed, fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde, and stained with DR4 or DR5 surface markers (1:200v/v) overnight at 4C in a rotating vessel. The immunostained cells were incubated with goat anti-mouse Dylight 488 (1:500v/v) secondary antibody for 2hours at room temperature before acquiring at least 10,000 cells in a flow cytometer.

The fluorescence resulting from interaction of cell DNA with Hoechst 33342 dye was measured to assess the cells ability to efflux the fluorescent dye Hoechst 33342, as most hematopoietic stem cells are able to exclude the dye [32]. HeLa or hCSCs were trypsinized with TrypLE, washed with PBS, and adjusted to 1106 cells/ml in Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS), before incubating with 5g/ml Hoechst 33342 dye (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) for 60minutes at 37C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The cells were then washed three times with HBSS by centrifugation at 300 g for 5minutes. The pellets were resuspended at 1106 cells/ml in HBSS and kept on ice until used for imaging. The Hoechst staining was visualized with an EVOS FL Epifluorescent Microscope (AMG, Bothell, WA) using the DAPI channel. Images were indicated as transmitted (phase contrast images of whole cells), Hoechst-stained (nuclei with Hoechst staining), and merge (an overlay of transmitted and Hoechst staining in the same field). The cells with Hoechst-stained nuclei were counted among 100 cells, and the number of Hoechst-excluded cells was then quantified.

The hCSCs were enriched in spheres in serum-free medium. Sphere culture was carried out as previously described in the sphere culture section. Cells were treated with predetermined doses of 0.5, 1.0, or 2.5M of PEITC or DMSO as control. After 7days incubation, photomicrographs of spheres were acquired under an inverted phase-contrast microscope (Olympus America Inc., Center Valley, PA), and the number of hCSCs was counted using a hemocytometer.

A standard colorimetric method (MTS assay) was used to determine the number of viable cells in samples. For cell-proliferation assays, HeLa and hCSCs were cultured for 4days, and an additional 9ml of sphere culture medium was added for another 5days, as described in the sphere culture section. Viable cells were harvested and counted with a hemocytometer before seeding into 96-well microplates at a density of 2104 cells per well. Cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin, 100g/ml streptomycin, 5% heat-inactivated FBS, and 50M 2-mercaptoethanol. Both hCSCs and HeLa cells were treated with four concentrations of PEITC and salinomycin (2.520M) and paclitaxel (2.520 nM). After 24 and 48hours of incubation, 20l of CellTiter reagent was added directly to the cell-culture wells and incubated for 1hour at 37C, followed by cell viability assessment using the CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI), containing [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, inner salt; MTS]. The manufacturers instructions were followed, and treatments were compared with vehicle control (DMSO-treated cells) at 490nm in a BioTek Synergy H4 multimode plate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT).

hCSCs (1106) were seeded in each well of a 6-well plate and incubated overnight at 37C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Old culture medium was replenished by culture medium containing either 10-M or 15-M concentrations of PEITC for 5hours. The cells were then treated with 10ng/ml human recombinant TRAIL or with 10ng/ml TNF (eBioscience, Inc., San Diego, CA) for additional 1-hour incubation. Cell harvesting and immunoblotting were carried out as we previously reported [9]. Briefly, cells were lysed in ice-cold RIPA buffer containing 150mM NaCl, 50mM Tris (pH8.0), 10% glycerol, 1% Nonidet P-40 (NP-40), and 0.4mM EDTA, followed by a brief vortexing and rotation for 30minutes at 4C. Equal amounts (v/v) of cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE through a 12% separating gel, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk, and double-probed overnight at 4C with mouse anti-human cPARP (1:1000v/v, Millipore, Billerica, MA) and rabbit anti-human -actin (1:5000v/v, Millipore, Billerica, MA) antibodies. Blots were then washed in PBS and further incubated with secondary antibodies, Dylight 680 anti-mouse (1:5000v/v) and Dylight 800 anti-rabbit (1:5000v/v), for 1hour at room temperature. Finally, after rinsing in Tween20 (0.1% in PBS), blots were imaged with a LI-COR Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE), followed by a densitometric analysis of cPARP levels after normalizing with the -actin housekeeping gene.

Animal studies were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of, and, using an approved protocol by, the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), South Dakota State University (IACUC protocol approval #12-087A). Twenty female non-obese diabetic, severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID, NOD.CB17-Prkdc scid/J) mice (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME), 17weeks old, were randomly grouped into five groups (four mice per group) in specific pathogen-free (SPF) housing at a constant temperature of 2426C with a 12-h:12-h light/dark cycle. All mice were allowed to acclimatize for 1week and were provided with sterile food and water ad libitum. HeLa and hCSCs were cultured, trypsinized, washed, pre-treated with 10M PEITC where indicated, and resuspended in PBS at the concentration of 1107 cells/ml before injecting into the mice. Each mouse was subcutaneously injected at the neck scruff with one injection of PBS (100l, control group), HeLa (1106), HeLa pretreated with 10M PEITC (1106), hCSCs (1106), or hCSCs pretreated with 10M PEITC (1106). The cell number in each injection was consistent with the study previously carried out by Gu et al. [5]. All mice were routinely monitored for tumor formation, weight loss, pain, and distress. The mice were euthanatized with CO2 asphyxiation 21days post-treatment, and blood was collected through cardiac puncture immediately after sacrifice. Excised tumor and lung samples were kept in 10% formalin for subsequent histopathological examination. The average tumor number or mass per injection was calculated by dividing each groups total number of tumors or total mass by the number of mice in that group.

Excised tumor, lung, and liver were fixed by immersion in 10% buffered formalin for 35 days and then transferred to 70% ethanol for long-term fixation. Representative sections of fixed tissue were trimmed and embedded in paraffin, then sectioned at 3m and stained by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) [33] for examination performed in a blind manner by a veterinary pathologist, and photomicrographs were captured under a microscope (Leica, Micro Service, St. Michael, MN) at 200 and 400 magnification for illustrative purposes.

Since hCSCs are of human origin, ELISA was carried out to assess the presence of human vascular endothelial growth factor A (hVEGF-A), which promotes tumor angiogenesis in a host. The collected mouse blood samples were kept in a slanted position at room temperature for 1hour, followed by 4C for 24hours, and then centrifuged at 5000rpm for 5minutes. The Platinum ELISA kit (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) was used to quantify the hVEGF-A present in each serum sample (pg/ml) from a single mouse, according to the manufacturers instructions.

Statistical analyses were carried out using Sigma Plot software (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA). Statistical significance between the groups was assessed by multiple mean comparisons using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post-hoc Dunnetts test. Students t test was applied to compare two groups receiving similar treatments. Data were expressed as meansSEM. Experiments were repeated at least three times. The significance of differences between means is represented by asterisks: *p0.05, **p0.01, ***p0.001.

In this report we used the HeLa cervical cancer cell line to isolate and characterize hCSCs following a previously described sphere culture method [

], which favors self-renewal of CSCs in culture but also causes minimal damage to the cells. In comparison with HeLa cells, the isolated/enriched hCSC population exhibited higher CD44 (90.93% vs. 51.52%) and lower CD24 (0.4% vs. 7.5%) cell-surface marker expression in flow cytometry analyses (Figure

A, B), consistent with results previously reported [

]. Multi-drug resistance characteristic of stem cells was indicated by transporter-mediated efflux of the fluorescent dye Hoechst 33342 [

], and significantly higher numbers of Hoechst-dye-excluded cells in hCSCs (73%) than in HeLa cells (15%) further confirmed their stem-like characteristics (Figure

C, D). Finally, in xenotransplanted mice, greater tumorigenicity was observed in the hCSC group (7 tumors/4 mice) than in the HeLa group (2 tumors/4 mice) (Figure

E). Following validation of hCSC characteristics, we investigated the effects of PEITC and other compounds on hCSCs. The significance of any treatment was compared with untreated/vehicle (DMSO) controls or otherwise specified.

Identification and confirmation of isolated HeLa cancer stem cells (hCSCs). A) Representative FACS histograms showing increased CD44 and decreased CD24 expression in hCSCs compared with HeLa cells B) Summary of FACS analyses showing the percentage of hCSCs expressing CD44 and CD24 (n=3) C) The Hoechst exclusion assay showing transmitted, Hoechst-stained, and overlaid images of HeLa cells and hCSCs. Hoechst 33342 dye emits blue fluorescence when bound to dsDNA. Yellow arrows show Hoechst-excluded cells lacking dark-blue nuclei (200-m scale), which were typically higher in hCSCs than in HeLa cells. D) Quantification of Hoechst-dye-excluded cells showing a higher exclusion rate in hCSCs (n=3). E) In vivo tumorigenicity was compared in NOD/SCID mice (four animals per group) 3weeks after xenotransplantation of HeLa cells, hCSCs, or vehicle (nave control), showing higher tumor counts in the hCSC group. All data are expressed as meansSEM except for in vivo tumor counts. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between the groups indicated, ***p0.001.

PEITC attenuated the formation of primary hCSC spheres in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure

A). Addition of PEITC (1.0 and 2.5M) resulted in a 48% and 60% decline in cell numbers, respectively (Figure

B), which is consistent with the corresponding reduction in sphere size (Figure

A). Lower concentrations of PEITC (2.5M) were used in sphere-forming enrichment culture media than in specific assays (2.5M), as shown in the remaining figures. PEITC also significantly reduced proliferation of both HeLa cells and hCSCs in a concentration-dependent manner after 24- and 48-hour exposures, which was a pattern comparable to the effects of salinomycin. The observed effects of 10 nM paclitaxel was limited (Figure

C) in our experiments, which may be due to the slow induction of cell death after low concentrations (10 nM) of paclitaxel, which occurs up to 72hours post treatment. It was previously shown that low concentrations of paclitaxel strongly block mitosis at the metaphase/anaphase transition but could be insufficient to cause immediate cell death in HeLa cells [

].

Effects of PEITC on HeLa cell and hCSC viability. A) Representative micrographs showing PEITC-attenuated sphere formation in hCSCs isolated from HeLa cells in a concentration-dependent manner as observed after 7days of culture in enrichment medium (400-m scale). B) Histogram showing quantification of viable cells on the 7th day of sphere culture from groups shown in A (n=5). C) Concentration-dependent effects of PEITC on the viability of HeLa cells and hCSCs after 24 (i) and 48 (ii) hours. Salinomycin and paclitaxel were used as known reference chemotherapeutic compounds. Absorbance was read at 490nm, and data were expressed as percentage cell viability (n=6). The dotted lines represent the baseline cell viability for DMSO/nave controls, to which all the readings were compared to obtain statistical significance. All data represent meansSEM, and significance was determined by comparing with nave control or as indicated, *p0.05, **p0.01, ***p0.001.

To investigate a potential pro-apoptotic effect of PEITC in triggering hCSC growth inhibition, we carried out western blot experiments on hCSCs treated with different doses of PEITC in the presence or absence of TRAIL and TNF. We observed an increased expression of cPARP with higher doses of PEITC (15M) following exposure for 5hours, which was further augmented by the presence of 10ng/ml TRAIL, which indicated elevated levels of endogenous caspase-mediated apoptosis in hCSCs (Figure

A). After normalizing to the housekeeping gene -actin, densitometric analysis of cPARP levels showed that PEITC induced cPARP and sensitized the TRAIL pathway but not the TNF pathway in hCSCs (Figure

A). It was previously shown that PEITC induces cPARP in HeLa cells [

], which we also observed (data not shown). Next, we carried out an annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) staining with or without TRAIL induction. Dot plot analyses showed that the fraction of annexin-positive cells in hCSCs treated with PEITC was higher than in untreated hCSCs (5.76% vs. 4.12%, Figure

B, C). Similarly, TRAIL-induced hCSCs treated with PEITC showed increased apoptosis relative to TRAIL-induced hCSCs (6.42% vs. 5.81%, Figure

B, C), although the difference was not statistically significant. When compared with the DMSO control, both PEITC- and TRAIL-treated hCSCs showed a trend toward higher apoptotic levels, indicating a potential sensitization of TRAIL-mediated apoptotic pathways by PEITC.

PEITC sensitizes the TRAIL pathway in hCSC apoptosis. A) Representative immunoblot and densitometric analysis (n=3) of cPARP levels in hCSCs after concentration- dependent PEITC exposure in the presence/absence of TRAIL (10ng/ml) and TNF (10ng/ml), normalized to housekeeping -actin expression levels. PEITC independently induced as well as synergized TRAIL induction of cPARP in hCSCs. B) A quantitative bar graph illustrating individual effects as well as synergism between 10M PEITC and TRAIL (10ng/ml) in sensitizing TRAIL-mediated apoptosis (n=3). C) Representative FACS scatter plots of data shown in B with annexin VFITC/propidium iodide staining, confirming individual effects as well as synergism between PEITC (10M) and TRAIL (10ng/ml) in sensitizing TRAIL- mediated apoptosis (iiv). All data represent meansSEM, and significance was determined by comparing with nave control or as indicated, *p0.05, **p0.01, ***p0.001.

To further understand the characteristics of PEITC in the extrinsic apoptosis pathway in hCSCs, we carried out flow cytometry analyses of DR4 and DR5 death receptors. Since both PEITC- and DMSO-treated hCSCs were treated with TRAIL (all treatments included TRAIL), we expected to see greater induction of DR4 and DR5 in PEITC+TRAIL-treated cells compared to TRAIL treatment alone. We observed that PEITC induced overexpression of DR4 in comparison with the DMSO control (69.01% and 52.52%, Figure

A iii, B). Similarly but to a lesser extent, the expression of DR5 in PEITC-treated hCSCs was higher (72.63% and 60.57%) than in the corresponding DMSO control (Figure

A iiiiv, B), showing that the slightly increased overexpression of DR5 was due to PEITC treatment. PEITC was previously shown to upregulate DR4 and DR5 in a different cervical cancer cell line (HEp-2) [

]; hence, we investigated its effect only on hCSCs.

PEITC up-regulated DR4 and DR5 receptors in TRAIL signaling. A) Representative FACS histograms of DR4 and DR5 expression in hCSCs treated with or without 10M PEITC in the presence of TRAIL. PEITC induced overexpression of DR4 (ii) and DR5 (iv) in comparison with DMSO controls (i) and (iii), respectively. The histograms do not show isotype controls. B) Quantitative bar diagrams presenting the groups from A (n=3). All data represent meansSEM, and significance was determined by comparing with nave control as indicated: **p0.01, ***p0.001.

To confirm the higher tumorigenic potential of hCSCs in vivo, we carried out a xenotransplant experiment in NOD-SCID immunodeficient mice that included four treatment groups and a negative/naive control group. Tumor development did not alter food intake and overall well-being of the mice, as evidenced by their normal body weight and activity (data not shown). An equal number of cells (1106) containing either HeLa cells or hCSCs (each with or without 10M PEITC pre-treatment) developed different tumor loads in each group of NOD/SCID mice. The average tumor number per injection was observed to be much higher in the hCSC group (1.75) than in the HeLa group (0.5), while PEITC pre-treatment helped lower tumor formation in both hCSC (1.75 vs. 0.5) and HeLa (0.5 vs. 0.33) groups of mice than in controls (Figure5B). A similar trend was observed when we calculated tumor mass per injection in each group. The hCSC group had a higher average tumor mass than the HeLa group (95mg vs. 60mg, respectively, data not shown). As expected, PEITC-treated hCSCs and HeLa cells produced a lower mass (85mg and 40mg, respectively) than their controls (95mg and 60mg, respectively, data not shown). To further visualize histological differences between tumors driven by CSCs and HeLa cells, the excised tumors were sectioned and stained with H&E. We observed a higher number of differentiated tumor cells with a low mitotic index in the HeLa group (Figure 5Ai). By contrast, the presence of pleomorphic and highly proliferative cells and early signs of neovascularization in the CSC group suggested that the tumors driven by CSCs are highly aggressive (Figure5Aiii). On the other hand, there were more apoptotic cells in the case of HeLa cells treated with PEITC (Figure5Aii) and hCSCs treated with PEITC (Figure5Aiv), suggesting that PEITC induces apoptosis in both HeLa cells and hCSCs.

To validate the human origin of these tumors, we performed ELISA on isolated serum samples. The hCSC group had the highest concentration of human hVEGF-A (12.31pg/ml), followed by hCSCs treated with PEITC (i.e., 4.62pg/ml) and untreated HeLa cells (1.08pg/ml), while we did not detect any hVEGF-A in HeLa cells treated with PEITC (Figure

C). To see whether hCSCs have metastatic potential, we carried out H&E staining of lung sections, which revealed invading tumor cells in the lungs of the hCSC group (Figure

D and Eiii) but not in the other groups. Overall, hCSCs were more tumorigenic than HeLa cells in this model, and their tumorigenicity was attenuated by PEITC pre-treatment prior to xenotransplant.

Effects of 10M PEITC-treated compared with untreated HeLa cells and hCSCs in a xenotransplant NOD/SCID mouse model. A) Representative photomicrographs of H&E-stained and sectioned tumors (3m, 400x) showing greater and more aggressive tumorigenic effects of hCSCs (iii) than HeLa cells (i). Details of native HeLa cells within a small tumor nodule with fairly uniform cell size and shape are shown (ii), and details of a small tumor nodule showing widespread apoptosis are also shown (iv). Empty arrows indicate apoptotic cells (yellow), high mitotic activity (blue), and early signs of neovascularization (white). B) Average tumor number per injection, where the untreated hCSC group showed the highest number of tumors per injection. C) The highest concentration of human serum VEGF-A was in the hCSC group, indicating the human origin of the tumors that were translocated into the blood circulation. D) The metastatic potential among the groups is shown. Metastasis was observed only in the untreated hCSC group. E) Representative photomicrographs of H&E-stained and sectioned lungs (3m, 200x). Filled arrows indicate lung bronchiole (yellow) as a landmark of distant tumor location and invading tumor cells (white) (iii). Overall, hCSCs showed increased tumorigenic activity compared with HeLa cells in this model, which was, however, attenuated upon pre-treatment with PEITC.

Cervical cancer is the second-most-frequent female malignancy worldwide [17]. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy represents the standard of care for patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer, while radical surgery and radiotherapy are widely used for treating early-stage disease. However, the poor control of micrometastases, declining operability, and the high incidence of long-term complications due to radiotherapy underscore the necessity for developing different therapeutic approaches, such as using an adjuvant CAM (complementary and alternative medicine) regimen for improved treatment outcomes [35]. Among cancer patients, the use of alternative treatments ranges between 30 and 75% worldwide and frequently includes dietary approaches, herbals, and other natural products [36]. It is becoming increasingly evident that cancer treatment that fails to eliminate CSCs allows relapse of the tumor [37]. Here we report novel effects of PEITC, a phytochemical that can be derived from a plant-based diet or may be developed as a natural product, in attenuating in vitro hCSC proliferation and in vivo tumorigenicity as well as stimulating intracellular receptors that mediate TRAIL-induced apoptosis.

According to the CSC concept of carcinogenesis, CSCs represent novel and translationally relevant targets for cancer therapy, and the identification, development, and therapeutic use of compounds that selectively target CSCs are major challenges for future cancer treatment [37]. It is proposed that direct targeting of CSCs through their defining surface antigens, such as CD44, is not a rational option, because these antigens are frequently expressed on normal stem cells [38]. On the other hand, triggering tumor cell apoptosis, in general, is the foundation of many cancer therapies. In the case of CSCs, it was suggested that the induction of apoptosis in the CSC fraction of tumor cells by specifically upregulating death receptors or death receptor ligands such as TRAIL is a potential strategy to bypass the refractory response of CSCs to conventional therapies [38]. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the potential of TRAIL to selectively induce apoptosis of tumor cells, because normal cells possess highly expressed decoy receptors that protect them from cell death [20, 39], which has driven the development of TRAIL-based cancer therapies [38, 40]. Unfortunately, a considerable range of cancer cells, especially in some highly malignant tumors, are resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis [41]. Therefore, TRAIL synergism using PEITC, a compound with an established low-toxicity profile in healthy animals [16] could offer an important approach to overcoming the current challenges in using TRAIL-targeted therapies, particularly in otherwise-resistant CSCs.

PEITC treatment in hCSCs reduced proliferation and sphere formation and expressed higher levels of cPARP, indicating elevated levels of apoptosis, which is possibly through caspase activation by isothiocyanate in treated cancer cells as reported previously [42]. At similar micromolar concentrations, the effects of PEITC on hCSC proliferation were comparable to salinomycin, which was shown to effectively eliminate CSCs and to induce partial clinical regression of heavily pretreated and therapy-resistant cancers [37]. It is worth mentioning here that salinomycin had considerable cytotoxicity in healthy mammals [37]. PEITC has been well documented for safety to normal mammals. It is interesting to investigate if PEITC is cytotoxic to normal stem cells, which has not been reported. Moreover, the effects of PEITC were significantly better in abrogating hCSC proliferation than paclitaxel, a current cancer chemotherapeutics. This better anti-proliferative effect may be due to the high level of chemoresistance of CSCs to paclitaxel, the overcoming of which by specific targeting of CSCs is hailed as critical. The concentration range of PEITC used (2.520M) was validated in our previous studies [8, 9, 43] and was also shown to be achievable following oral administration in human [30].

We observed that PEITC likely sensitized TRAIL but not the TNF pathway while inducing apoptosis. Although TNF- can trigger apoptosis in some solid tumors, its clinical usage has been limited by the risk of lethal systemic inflammation [44]. By comparing hCSCs treated with PEITC to those without PEITC, we observed PEITC also induced the expression of death receptors DR4 and DR5 in hCSCs, which has not been reported earlier. PEITC was, however, previously shown to upregulate DR4 and DR5 in a different human cervical cancer cell line [12]. The expression levels of either DR4 alone or both death receptors are correlated with TRAIL sensitivity of a cell line [45]. Our result revealed expression of both death receptors were elicited following PEITC treatment, but DR5 expression increase was to a lesser extent compared with DR4s increase. TRAIL is known to trigger apoptosis through binding to DR4 or DR5, which contain cytoplasmic death domains responsible for recruiting adaptor molecules involved in caspase activation [21]. Since all treatments shown in Figure4 included TRAIL treatments, the observations indicate that hCSCs are more prone to TRAIL treatment after incubation with PEITC. While the biological activity of PEITC in inducing apoptosis of cancer cells may involve death receptor signaling, other mechanisms have also been suggested [12, 13]. Finally, to investigate the antagonistic effects of PEITC on hCSC tumorigenicity in vivo, we carried out xenotransplantation in immune-compromised mice. Mice receiving untreated hCSCs produced the highest numbers of tumors and also showed greater invasiveness, as confirmed by the presence of lung metastases. However, given the short 3-week duration of the experiment, metastasis was found in only one of the four animals in the hCSC group but in no other animal in the remaining groups. We observed a marked reduction in tumorigenicity in mice that had received a PEITC-treated hCSC inoculum, and the outcome was comparable to the HeLa-injection group. It should be noted here that the sphere culture approach to isolation of hCSCs that we used in the study followed by cell-surface marker-based characterization helps to identify CSC-enriched subpopulations but did not enable unambiguous isolation of all of the CSCs.

We have provided the first evidence that PEITC is effective in abolishing human cervical CSCs in vitro, and PEITC-treated hCSC xenotransplants were less tumorigenic in a relevant mouse model. PEITC, in combination with TRAIL, upregulated the death receptor-induced extrinsic pathway of apoptosis and resulted in the increase in cPARP proteins. It should be noted that in the current study we did not evaluate the individual effectiveness of TRAIL against hCSCs, but TRAIL is currently in clinical trials in the US (NCT00508625). Importantly, PEITC is anti-proliferative in both HeLa cancer cells and hCSCs, suggesting that it may contribute to eradication of cancer more efficiently than compounds targeting either CSCs or regular cancer cells alone. Collectively, our data strongly justify future clinical trials of PEITC, individually or in combination with recombinant TRAIL therapy, for improved treatment outcomes in cancer patients.

Cleaved poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase

Cancer stem cells

Death receptors

HeLa cervical cancer stem cells

Human vascular endothelial growth factor A

Non-obese diabetic, severe combined immunodeficient

No-observed-adverse-effect-level

Phenethyl isothiocyanate

Tumor necrotic factor-alpha

Tumor necrotic factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand.

We acknowledge Qingming Song for his help with mice work. Support for this work came from National Institutes of Health grant R00AT4245 and SD-Agriculture Experiment Station grant 3AH360 to MD. The funding agencies had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Study conception: MD; Designed research: DW, YL, BU, MD; Conducted Research: DW, BU, YL, DK; Project direction/supervision and provision of reagents/materials/equipment: MD; Data analyses: YL, BU; Manuscript writing: MD, BU, YL; All authors read, provided comments and approved the manuscript.

Read the original:
Phenethyl isothiocyanate upregulates death ... - BMC Cancer

Read More...

Biotechnology | University of Wisconsin-River Falls

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

Mission Statement

The mission of the Biotechnology Program at the University of Wisconsin-River Falls is to provide its students with an education that establishes a strong foundation and appreciation for understanding developments in the rapidly advancing field of biotechnology, to develop the technical and critical thinking skills necessary for success in the field, to foster ethical behavior, and to promote outreach.

The field of modern biotechnology was born of molecular biology and biochemistry. Modern Biotechnology provides a set of tools that allow scientists to modify and harness the genetic capabilities of organisms. This has led to rapid advances in many areas including pharmaceutical development, agriculture, food microbiology, medical devices and environmental sciences.

Some examples of the products of biotechnology include herbicide, drought and insect resistant crops, drugs targeted specifically to disease processes resulting in fewer side effects, and bioremediation capable of removing greater amounts of environmental toxins at reduced cost.

The Biotechnology major at UWRF is an interdepartmental program with an emphasis on the molecular basis of life and the techniques utilized to study and control these processes under in vivo, in vitro, and commercial production conditions. UWRF LogoThe Biotechnology curriculum is an integrated sequence of courses selected from the curricula of the departments of Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Animal and Food Science, and Plant and Earth Science. It includes both traditional offerings of the departments involved and courses that reflect advances in biochemistry, biophysics, and molecular biology. The Biotechnology major is designed to provide students interested in pursuing careers in this rapidly expanding field with the academic background required to either secure entry level positions in industry or to continue their education in graduate or professional schools. A student may complete a B.S. degree in Biotechnology in the College of Arts and Sciences or the College of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Sciences.

Current curriculum check list (2008-2009)

Planning sheets

A scholarship has been established that is awarded to an outstanding junior or senior biotechnology major that either has worked on a research project, or will be participating in a research project during the year of the scholarship award. Follow the link above for information regarding scholarship criteria, recipients of the scholarship, and contributing to the scholarship fund.

Assessment of student learning is important to the University, the Colleges and the Biotechnology Program. Through appropriate assessment practices, we maintain a strong, current degree program and improve the quality of the education our students receive.

Originally posted here:
Biotechnology | University of Wisconsin-River Falls

Read More...

Biotechnology – Academic Majors (NDSU)

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

Biotechnology is an interdisciplinary field that uses a combination of biology and technology to design and produce new molecules, plants, animals and microorganisms with improved characteristics. Biotechnology offers seemingly unlimited opportunities to combine genes from related or unrelated species to produce useful organisms with desirable properties that were not previously found in nature.

PDF Download

Biotechnology may be thought of as a collection of technologies using animal and/or plant cells, biological molecules, molecular biology processes and genetic engineering for applications in medicine, agriculture and the pharmaceutical industry. The technologies include the use of recombinant DNA for gene cloning and gene transfers between organisms; culture of plant and animal cells and tissues; fusion of animal cells or plant protoplast; the regeneration of whole plants from single cells and the large-scale fermentation processes that use some of these novel organisms for the production of pharmaceuticals, diagnostic tests for diseases, feed additives, enzymes and hormones.

Examples of successful biotechnology include the development of crop plants that are resistant to herbicides or insects, the production of human growth hormone and insulin by genetically engineered bacteria and the development of unique vaccines.

The biotechnology program is offered through both the College of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Natural Resources and the College of Science and Mathematics and leads to a Bachelor of Science degree.

The recommended course of study includes both the education in science and mathematics, as well as introduction to the special skills that are needed to enter the rapidly expanding and changing field of biotechnology. In addition to the required courses, students may select from a variety of specialized elective science courses to help develop a particular area of interest. Students majoring in biotechnology are required to perform a research project in the laboratory of a faculty advisor. The results of the research project are incorporated into a senior thesis and presented at the Biotechnology Seminar.

Biotechnology students must maintain at least a 2.5 overall grade point average (GPA) after 60 credits in order to remain in the program.

A faculty advisor is assigned to each student to assist in scheduling, registration and career development. Faculty in each of the cooperating life-science departments have been identified to serve as academic and research advisors for students who select the biotechnology major. The faculty advisor and the director of the biotechnology program regularly review the progress of each student.

The faculty who advise, teach and serve as research mentors for the biotechnology program are spread among several academic departments in the College of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Natural Resources, the College of Science and Mathematics and the College of Health Professions. The departments include plant sciences; biological sciences, biology, botany and zoology; chemistry, biochemistry and molecular biology; animal and range sciences; plant pathology; veterinary and microbiological sciences; and pharmaceutical sciences. Several scientists at the NDSU Center for Nanoscale Science and Engineering and at the on-campus USDA facilities also serve as research mentors.

Laboratory facilities and specialized equipment are used for instruction and research. These include animal and plant tissue culture facilities, small animal housing, electron and confocal microscopes, automated DNA sequencing equipment, equipment for performing microarray experiments, and NDSU Core Labs. The Core Labs are shared cutting-edge research facilities and include the Advanced Imaging and Microscopy Core, Core Biology Facility, Core Synthesis and Analytical Services and the Electron Microscopy Core Laboratory, among many other state-of-the-art facilities and equipment.

Biotechnology continues to rapidly develop into new research areas. Surveys indicate there will be a continuing high demand for well-educated personnel. Job opportunities are found in life science departments in colleges and universities; private and government research institutes; food production, pharmaceutical and agri-chemical industries; and in the biotechnology industries. Graduates of this program have the educational background and laboratory experience to take advantage of any of these job opportunities. Graduates of the biotechnology program are now successful and productive scientists at pharmaceutical, agri-chemical and biotechnology companies, and at government and private research institutions throughout the country.

The majority (approximately 60 percent) of graduates from the biotechnology program choose to continue their education in graduate or professional schools. Graduates of the biotechnology program have earned masters and doctoral degrees in many diverse areas, including cellular and molecular biology, biology, microbiology, plant sciences, animal physiology, cancer biology and virology at many of the most respected universities in the United States. Graduates of our program are now established and productive professors, physicians and veterinarians.

Students entering the biotechnology program should have a strong background in mathematics, including trigonometry, biology, chemistry, preferably physics, writing and computer courses. A composite ACT score of 26 or higher is recommended.

4

This sample curriculum is not intended to serve as a curriculum guide for current students, but rather an example of course offerings for prospective students. For the curriculum requirements in effect at the time of entrance into a program, consult with an academic advisor or with the Office of Registration and Records.

Van Es Hall Lab 160

Van Es Hall is located on the west side of campus on Centennial Boulevard (Campus Map)

Originally posted here:
Biotechnology - Academic Majors (NDSU)

Read More...

Home | Master of Science in Biotechnology | Northwestern’s …

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

Biotechnology is a young, vibrant and diverse discipline, whose tenet is to use microorganisms for the manufacturing of biological therapeutics, foods, chemicals, and other products benefitting people. It includes agrobiotechnology, biopharmaceuticals, diagnostics, and bioremediation. The future of biotechnology lies in advances in healthcare, industrial biotechnology, biofuels, and cleantech.

Graduates of the Master of Biotechnology program at Northwestern University possess:

Read a message from the director Learn more about the curriculum Meet the faculty

Degree Name

Master of Science in Biotechnology

Duration

15 months, full-time, without internship 21 months, full-time, with internship

Start Date

September 2016

Program Structure

Program Features

Location

Evanston campus

Cost

$14,292 tuition fee per quarter, plus cost of living, textbooks, and other miscellaneous fees

Scholarships of up to $10,000 available to domestic students

Tuition and funding information

Application opens

September 1

Application deadlines

The majority of MBP students are recent graduates seeking careers in biotechnology and associated professions, as well as the competitive advantage a higher degree provides. At least half are typically biology majors; the rest are engineers, biotechnologists, and other science majors. The expected class size is 3540 students per year.

Learn more about our student body

Northwestern's program is distinguished from other MS in biotechnology programs by the integration of biology and engineering combined with extensive hands-on research in Northwestern University faculty laboratories.

In addition to research experience, students benefit from:

The program also offers multiplecertificate and minor options for students seeking to complement their technical skills.

Our interdisciplinary approach provides students with the flexibility and knowledge to pursue a number of biotechnology professions. In addition to becoming research and process development specialists, MBP graduates have taken up roles as consultants, regulatory affairs associates, and analysts.

Our program can also prepare students to meet the demands of doctoral programs. MBP graduates have pursued PhDs in Chemical Engineering and the Biological Sciences while others have gone on to work towards their MD or JD.

Learn more about career opportunities

See more here:
Home | Master of Science in Biotechnology | Northwestern's ...

Read More...

UAH – College of Science – Departments & Programs – Biotechnology

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

Welcome to Biotechnology at UAH.

The Graduate Program in Biotechnology Science and Engineering is an Interdisciplinary Program with faculty from the Departments of Chemistry, Biological Sciences and Chemical Engineering. Adjunct faculty from the Marshall Space Flight Center and local biotechnology research centers and companies are also involved in the program.

The program's mission is to provide Ph.D. level graduates who are broadly trained in the areas of science and engineering pertinent to biotechnology and who will benefit the economic, educational, and cultural development of Alabama. Graduates of the program are expected to be able to make significant contributions to biotechnology in academic, governmental, and business settings.

The interdisciplinary program in Biotechnology Science and Engineering provides broad training in sciences and engineering dealing with the handling and the processing of macromolecules and living systems. Students receive advanced training in one of three specializations: Structural Biology, Biomolecular Sciences or Bioprocess Engineering. The principal core of instructors and research advisors are drawn from the Departments of Biological Sciences, Chemistry, and Chemical and Materials Engineering. The program includes significant involvement from local biotechnology companies as well as NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.

Biotechnology is not a single area of study, but a multidisciplinary field concerned with the practical application of biological organisms and their subcellular components to industrial or service manufacturing, to environmental management and health, and to medicine. It is a series of enabling technologies drawn from the fields of microbiology, cellular biology, molecular biology, genetics, biochemistry, immunology, fermentation technology, environmental science and engineering which allow one to synthesize, breakdown or transform materials to suit human needs. Biotechnology ("Current Trends in Chemical Technology, Business, and Employment," American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. 1998) can therefore be defined as the safe study and manipulation of biological molecules for development of products or techniques for medical and industrial application. Although biotechnology in the broadest sense is not new, the current ability and demand for manipulating living organisms or their subcellular components to provide useful products, processes or services has reached new heights. Modern biotechnology has resulted from scientific scrutiny of old and familiar processes and from new advances in molecular biology, genetic engineering and fermentation technologies.

The future industrial landscape will continue to include research, development and the manufacturing of products such as proteins and nucleic acids that will be based wholly or in large part on biological processes.

Shelby Center,Room 369J The University of Alabama in Huntsville301 Sparkman Drive Huntsville, AL 35899

Dr. Joseph D. Ng email: uahbiotechnology@gmail.com phone: 256.824.6166 fax: 256.824.6305

View post:
UAH - College of Science - Departments & Programs - Biotechnology

Read More...

Biotechnology | Jamestown Community College

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

We are living in the midst of a biotechnology revolution.

In the not too distant future, organ transplants will be a thing of the past. Doctors will use your DNA to determine treatment options. And these treatments will be available for animals and humans alike. Fueling all of this change is biotechnology. You can be one of these innovators not only by becoming a researcher, but also by following a variety of other career paths, including becoming a doctor, veterinarian, patent lawyer, health inspector, orenvironmental biotechnologist.

We prepare students for transfer to a four-year college to major in biology, biochemistry, pharmacology, molecular genetics, immunology, and related fields. Our program is also good preparation for medical, veterinary, dental, and pharmaceutical school and it provides the robust, interdisciplinary training modern baccalaureate science programs demand.

You don't have to move hundreds of miles away to work in biotechnology. We now have many biotechnology employers right in the area. They NEED YOU to be successful.

Biotechnology students at JCC perform on-site research in multiple areas, including immunology, breast cancer, heartworm, and Lyme disease. Students can gain even more experience by taking part in the Science Undergraduate Research Initiative: Biotech(SURI). We're also involved with area high schools through the HURI SURI program, which is designed to give high school students a chance to perform actual research through an interdisciplinary, college level course called Biology: A Molecular Approach.

Several biotechnology students attended the Experimental Biology Conference in Washington, DC in April 2011 and the American Association of Immunologists meeting in Boston in May 2012.

See the article here:
Biotechnology | Jamestown Community College

Read More...

Biotechnology – Wikipedia for Schools

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

Background Information

SOS Children offer a complete download of this selection for schools for use on schools intranets. SOS Children is the world's largest charity giving orphaned and abandoned children the chance of family life.

Biotechnology is technology based on biology, especially when used in agriculture, food science, and medicine. The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity defines biotechnology as:

Any technological application that uses biological systems, living organisms, or derivatives thereof, to make or modify products or processes for specific use.

Biotechnology is often used to refer to genetic engineering technology of the 21st century, however the term encompasses a wider range and history of procedures for modifying biological organisms according to the needs of humanity, going back to the initial modifications of native plants into improved food crops through artificial selection and hybridization. Bioengineering is the science upon which all biotechnological applications are based. With the development of new approaches and modern techniques, traditional biotechnology industries are also acquiring new horizons enabling them to improve the quality of their products and increase the productivity of their systems.

Before 1971, the term, biotechnology, was primarily used in the food processing and agriculture industries. Since the 1970s, it began to be used by the Western scientific establishment to refer to laboratory-based techniques being developed in biological research, such as recombinant DNA or tissue culture-based processes, or horizontal gene transfer in living plants, using vectors such as the Agrobacterium bacteria to transfer DNA into a host organism. In fact, the term should be used in a much broader sense to describe the whole range of methods, both ancient and modern, used to manipulate organic materials to reach the demands of food production. So the term could be defined as, "The application of indigenous and/or scientific knowledge to the management of (parts of) microorganisms, or of cells and tissues of higher organisms, so that these supply goods and services of use to the food industry and its consumers.

Biotechnology combines disciplines like genetics, molecular biology, biochemistry, embryology and cell biology, which are in turn linked to practical disciplines like chemical engineering, information technology, and robotics. Patho-biotechnology describes the exploitation of pathogens or pathogen derived compounds for beneficial effect.

The most practical use of biotechnology, which is still present today, is the cultivation of plants to produce food suitable to humans. Agriculture has been theorized to have become the dominant way of producing food since the Neolithic Revolution. The processes and methods of agriculture have been refined by other mechanical and biological sciences since its inception. Through early biotechnology, farmers were able to select the best suited and highest-yield crops to produce enough food to support a growing population. Other uses of biotechnology were required as crops and fields became increasingly large and difficult to maintain. Specific organisms and organism by-products were used to fertilize, restore nitrogen, and control pests. Throughout the use of agriculture farmers have inadvertently altered the genetics of their crops through introducing them to new environments and breeding them with other plants--one of the first forms of biotechnology. Cultures such as those in Mesopotamia, Egypt, and Pakistan developed the process of brewing beer. It is still done by the same basic method of using malted grains (containing enzymes) to convert starch from grains into sugar and then adding specific yeasts to produce beer. In this process the carbohydrates in the grains were broken down into alcohols such as ethanol. Ancient Indians also used the juices of the plant Ephedra Vulgaris and used to call it Soma. Later other cultures produced the process of Lactic acid fermentation which allowed the fermentation and preservation of other forms of food. Fermentation was also used in this time period to produce leavened bread. Although the process of fermentation was not fully understood until Louis Pasteurs work in 1857, it is still the first use of biotechnology to convert a food source into another form.

Combinations of plants and other organisms were used as medications in many early civilizations. Since as early as 200 BC, people began to use disabled or minute amounts of infectious agents to immunize themselves against infections. These and similar processes have been refined in modern medicine and have led to many developments such as antibiotics, vaccines, and other methods of fighting sickness.

In the early twentieth century scientists gained a greater understanding of microbiology and explored ways of manufacturing specific products. In 1917, Chaim Weizmann first used a pure microbiological culture in an industrial process, that of manufacturing corn starch using Clostridium acetobutylicum to produce acetone, which the United Kingdom desperately needed to manufacture explosives during World War I.

The field of modern biotechnology is thought to have largely begun on June 16, 1980, when the United States Supreme Court ruled that a genetically-modified microorganism could be patented in the case of Diamond v. Chakrabarty. Indian-born Ananda Chakrabarty, working for General Electric, had developed a bacterium (derived from the Pseudomonas genus) capable of breaking down crude oil, which he proposed to use in treating oil spills.

Revenue in the industry is expected to grow by 12.9% in 2008. Another factor influencing the biotechnology sector's success is improved intellectual property rights legislation -- and enforcement -- worldwide, as well as strengthened demand for medical and pharmaceutical products to cope with an ageing, and ailing, U.S. population .

Rising demand for biofuels is expected to be good news for the biotechnology sector, with the Department of Energy estimating ethanol usage could reduce U.S. petroleum-derived fuel consumption by up to 30% by 2030. The biotechnology sector has allowed the U.S. farming industry to rapidly increase its supply of corn and soybeans -- the main inputs into biofuels -- by developing genetically-modified seeds which are resistant to pests and drought. By boosting farm productivity, biotechnology plays a crucial role in ensuring that biofuel production targets are met.

Biotechnology has applications in four major industrial areas, including health care (medical), crop production and agriculture, non food (industrial) uses of crops and other products (e.g. biodegradable plastics, vegetable oil, biofuels), and environmental uses.

For example, one application of biotechnology is the directed use of organisms for the manufacture of organic products (examples include beer and milk products). Another example is using naturally present bacteria by the mining industry in bioleaching. Biotechnology is also used to recycle, treat waste, clean up sites contaminated by industrial activities ( bioremediation), and also to produce biological weapons.

A series of derived terms have been coined to identify several branches of biotechnology, for example:

In medicine, modern biotechnology finds promising applications in such areas as

Pharmacogenomics is the study of how the genetic inheritance of an individual affects his/her bodys response to drugs. It is a coined word derived from the words pharmacology and genomics. It is hence the study of the relationship between pharmaceuticals and genetics. The vision of pharmacogenomics is to be able to design and produce drugs that are adapted to each persons genetic makeup.

Pharmacogenomics results in the following benefits:

1. Development of tailor-made medicines. Using pharmacogenomics, pharmaceutical companies can create drugs based on the proteins, enzymes and RNA molecules that are associated with specific genes and diseases. These tailor-made drugs promise not only to maximize therapeutic effects but also to decrease damage to nearby healthy cells.

2. More accurate methods of determining appropriate drug dosages. Knowing a patients genetics will enable doctors to determine how well his/ her body can process and metabolize a medicine. This will maximize the value of the medicine and decrease the likelihood of overdose.

3. Improvements in the drug discovery and approval process. The discovery of potential therapies will be made easier using genome targets. Genes have been associated with numerous diseases and disorders. With modern biotechnology, these genes can be used as targets for the development of effective new therapies, which could significantly shorten the drug discovery process.

4. Better vaccines. Safer vaccines can be designed and produced by organisms transformed by means of genetic engineering. These vaccines will elicit the immune response without the attendant risks of infection. They will be inexpensive, stable, easy to store, and capable of being engineered to carry several strains of pathogen at once.

Most traditional pharmaceutical drugs are relatively simple molecules that have been found primarily through trial and error to treat the symptoms of a disease or illness. Biopharmaceuticals are large biological molecules known as proteins and these usually target the underlying mechanisms and pathways of a malady (but not always, as is the case with using insulin to treat type 1 diabetes mellitus, as that treatment merely addresses the symptoms of the disease, not the underlying cause which is autoimmunity); it is a relatively young industry. They can deal with targets in humans that may not be accessible with traditional medicines. A patient typically is dosed with a small molecule via a tablet while a large molecule is typically injected.

Small molecules are manufactured by chemistry but larger molecules are created by living cells such as those found in the human body: for example, bacteria cells, yeast cells, animal or plant cells.

Modern biotechnology is often associated with the use of genetically altered microorganisms such as E. coli or yeast for the production of substances like synthetic insulin or antibiotics. It can also refer to transgenic animals or transgenic plants, such as Bt corn. Genetically altered mammalian cells, such as Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells, are also used to manufacture certain pharmaceuticals. Another promising new biotechnology application is the development of plant-made pharmaceuticals.

Biotechnology is also commonly associated with landmark breakthroughs in new medical therapies to treat hepatitis B, hepatitis C, cancers, arthritis, haemophilia, bone fractures, multiple sclerosis, and cardiovascular disorders. The biotechnology industry has also been instrumental in developing molecular diagnostic devices than can be used to define the target patient population for a given biopharmaceutical. Herceptin, for example, was the first drug approved for use with a matching diagnostic test and is used to treat breast cancer in women whose cancer cells express the protein HER2.

Modern biotechnology can be used to manufacture existing medicines relatively easily and cheaply. The first genetically engineered products were medicines designed to treat human diseases. To cite one example, in 1978 Genentech developed synthetic humanized insulin by joining its gene with a plasmid vector inserted into the bacterium Escherichia coli. Insulin, widely used for the treatment of diabetes, was previously extracted from the pancreas of abattoir animals (cattle and/or pigs). The resulting genetically engineered bacterium enabled the production of vast quantities of synthetic human insulin at relatively low cost, although the cost savings was used to increase profits for manufacturers, not passed on to consumers or their healthcare providers. According to a 2003 study undertaken by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) on the access to and availability of insulin in its member countries, synthetic 'human' insulin is considerably more expensive in most countries where both synthetic 'human' and animal insulin are commercially available: e.g. within European countries the average price of synthetic 'human' insulin was twice as high as the price of pork insulin. Yet in its position statement, the IDF writes that "there is no overwhelming evidence to prefer one species of insulin over another" and "[modern, highly-purified] animal insulins remain a perfectly acceptable alternative.

Modern biotechnology has evolved, making it possible to produce more easily and relatively cheaply human growth hormone, clotting factors for hemophiliacs, fertility drugs, erythropoietin and other drugs. Most drugs today are based on about 500 molecular targets. Genomic knowledge of the genes involved in diseases, disease pathways, and drug-response sites are expected to lead to the discovery of thousands more new targets.

Genetic testing involves the direct examination of the DNA molecule itself. A scientist scans a patients DNA sample for mutated sequences.

There are two major types of gene tests. In the first type, a researcher may design short pieces of DNA (probes) whose sequences are complementary to the mutated sequences. These probes will seek their complement among the base pairs of an individuals genome. If the mutated sequence is present in the patients genome, the probe will bind to it and flag the mutation. In the second type, a researcher may conduct the gene test by comparing the sequence of DNA bases in a patients gene to disease in healthy individuals or their progeny.

Genetic testing is now used for:

Some genetic tests are already available, although most of them are used in developed countries. The tests currently available can detect mutations associated with rare genetic disorders like cystic fibrosis, sickle cell anaemia, and Huntingtons disease. Recently, tests have been developed to detect mutation for a handful of more complex conditions such as breast, ovarian, and colon cancers. However, gene tests may not detect every mutation associated with a particular condition because many are as yet undiscovered, and the ones they do detect may present different risks to different people and populations.

Several issues have been raised regarding the use of genetic testing:

1. Absence of cure. There is still a lack of effective treatment or preventive measures for many diseases and conditions now being diagnosed or predicted using gene tests. Thus, revealing information about risk of a future disease that has no existing cure presents an ethical dilemma for medical practitioners.

2. Ownership and control of genetic information. Who will own and control genetic information, or information about genes, gene products, or inherited characteristics derived from an individual or a group of people like indigenous communities? At the macro level, there is a possibility of a genetic divide, with developing countries that do not have access to medical applications of biotechnology being deprived of benefits accruing from products derived from genes obtained from their own people. Moreover, genetic information can pose a risk for minority population groups as it can lead to group stigmatization.

At the individual level, the absence of privacy and anti-discrimination legal protections in most countries can lead to discrimination in employment or insurance or other misuse of personal genetic information. This raises questions such as whether genetic privacy is different from medical privacy.

3. Reproductive issues. These include the use of genetic information in reproductive decision-making and the possibility of genetically altering reproductive cells that may be passed on to future generations. For example, germline therapy forever changes the genetic make-up of an individuals descendants. Thus, any error in technology or judgment may have far-reaching consequences. Ethical issues like designer babies and human cloning have also given rise to controversies between and among scientists and bioethicists, especially in the light of past abuses with eugenics.

4. Clinical issues. These centre on the capabilities and limitations of doctors and other health-service providers, people identified with genetic conditions, and the general public in dealing with genetic information.

5. Effects on social institutions. Genetic tests reveal information about individuals and their families. Thus, test results can affect the dynamics within social institutions, particularly the family.

6. Conceptual and philosophical implications regarding human responsibility, free will vis--vis genetic determinism, and the concepts of health and disease.

Gene therapy may be used for treating, or even curing, genetic and acquired diseases like cancer and AIDS by using normal genes to supplement or replace defective genes or to bolster a normal function such as immunity. It can be used to target somatic (i.e., body) or germ (i.e., egg and sperm) cells. In somatic gene therapy, the genome of the recipient is changed, but this change is not passed along to the next generation. In contrast, in germline gene therapy, the egg and sperm cells of the parents are changed for the purpose of passing on the changes to their offspring.

There are basically two ways of implementing a gene therapy treatment:

1. Ex vivo, which means outside the body Cells from the patients blood or bone marrow are removed and grown in the laboratory. They are then exposed to a virus carrying the desired gene. The virus enters the cells, and the desired gene becomes part of the DNA of the cells. The cells are allowed to grow in the laboratory before being returned to the patient by injection into a vein.

2. In vivo, which means inside the body No cells are removed from the patients body. Instead, vectors are used to deliver the desired gene to cells in the patients body.

Currently, the use of gene therapy is limited. Somatic gene therapy is primarily at the experimental stage. Germline therapy is the subject of much discussion but it is not being actively investigated in larger animals and human beings.

As of June 2001, more than 500 clinical gene-therapy trials involving about 3,500 patients have been identified worldwide. Around 78% of these are in the United States, with Europe having 18%. These trials focus on various types of cancer, although other multigenic diseases are being studied as well. Recently, two children born with severe combined immunodeficiency disorder (SCID) were reported to have been cured after being given genetically engineered cells.

Gene therapy faces many obstacles before it can become a practical approach for treating disease. At least four of these obstacles are as follows:

1. Gene delivery tools. Genes are inserted into the body using gene carriers called vectors. The most common vectors now are viruses, which have evolved a way of encapsulating and delivering their genes to human cells in a pathogenic manner. Scientists manipulate the genome of the virus by removing the disease-causing genes and inserting the therapeutic genes. However, while viruses are effective, they can introduce problems like toxicity, immune and inflammatory responses, and gene control and targeting issues.

2. Limited knowledge of the functions of genes. Scientists currently know the functions of only a few genes. Hence, gene therapy can address only some genes that cause a particular disease. Worse, it is not known exactly whether genes have more than one function, which creates uncertainty as to whether replacing such genes is indeed desirable.

3. Multigene disorders and effect of environment. Most genetic disorders involve more than one gene. Moreover, most diseases involve the interaction of several genes and the environment. For example, many people with cancer not only inherit the disease gene for the disorder, but may have also failed to inherit specific tumor suppressor genes. Diet, exercise, smoking and other environmental factors may have also contributed to their disease.

4. High costs. Since gene therapy is relatively new and at an experimental stage, it is an expensive treatment to undertake. This explains why current studies are focused on illnesses commonly found in developed countries, where more people can afford to pay for treatment. It may take decades before developing countries can take advantage of this technology.

The Human Genome Project is an initiative of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) that aims to generate a high-quality reference sequence for the entire human genome and identify all the human genes.

The DOE and its predecessor agencies were assigned by the U.S. Congress to develop new energy resources and technologies and to pursue a deeper understanding of potential health and environmental risks posed by their production and use. In 1986, the DOE announced its Human Genome Initiative. Shortly thereafter, the DOE and National Institutes of Health developed a plan for a joint Human Genome Project (HGP), which officially began in 1990.

The HGP was originally planned to last 15 years. However, rapid technological advances and worldwide participation accelerated the completion date to 2003 (making it a 13 year project). Already it has enabled gene hunters to pinpoint genes associated with more than 30 disorders.

Cloning involves the removal of the nucleus from one cell and its placement in an unfertilized egg cell whose nucleus has either been deactivated or removed.

There are two types of cloning:

1. Reproductive cloning. After a few divisions, the egg cell is placed into a uterus where it is allowed to develop into a fetus that is genetically identical to the donor of the original nucleus.

2. Therapeutic cloning. The egg is placed into a Petri dish where it develops into embryonic stem cells, which have shown potentials for treating several ailments.

In February 1997, cloning became the focus of media attention when Ian Wilmut and his colleagues at the Roslin Institute announced the successful cloning of a sheep, named Dolly, from the mammary glands of an adult female. The cloning of Dolly made it apparent to many that the techniques used to produce her could someday be used to clone human beings. This stirred a lot of controversy because of its ethical implications.

Using the techniques of modern biotechnology, one or two genes may be transferred to a highly developed crop variety to impart a new character that would increase its yield (30). However, while increases in crop yield are the most obvious applications of modern biotechnology in agriculture, it is also the most difficult one. Current genetic engineering techniques work best for effects that are controlled by a single gene. Many of the genetic characteristics associated with yield (e.g., enhanced growth) are controlled by a large number of genes, each of which has a minimal effect on the overall yield (31). There is, therefore, much scientific work to be done in this area.

Crops containing genes that will enable them to withstand biotic and abiotic stresses may be developed. For example, drought and excessively salty soil are two important limiting factors in crop productivity. Biotechnologists are studying plants that can cope with these extreme conditions in the hope of finding the genes that enable them to do so and eventually transferring these genes to the more desirable crops. One of the latest developments is the identification of a plant gene, At-DBF2, from thale cress, a tiny weed that is often used for plant research because it is very easy to grow and its genetic code is well mapped out. When this gene was inserted into tomato and tobacco cells (see RNA interference), the cells were able to withstand environmental stresses like salt, drought, cold and heat, far more than ordinary cells. If these preliminary results prove successful in larger trials, then At-DBF2 genes can help in engineering crops that can better withstand harsh environments (32). Researchers have also created transgenic rice plants that are resistant to rice yellow mottle virus (RYMV). In Africa, this virus destroys majority of the rice crops and makes the surviving plants more susceptible to fungal infections (33).

Proteins in foods may be modified to increase their nutritional qualities. Proteins in legumes and cereals may be transformed to provide the amino acids needed by human beings for a balanced diet (34). A good example is the work of Professors Ingo Potrykus and Peter Beyer on the so-called Goldenrice(discussed below).

Modern biotechnology can be used to slow down the process of spoilage so that fruit can ripen longer on the plant and then be transported to the consumer with a still reasonable shelf life. This improves the taste, texture and appearance of the fruit. More importantly, it could expand the market for farmers in developing countries due to the reduction in spoilage.

The first genetically modified food product was a tomato which was transformed to delay its ripening (35). Researchers in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines and Vietnam are currently working on delayed-ripening papaya in collaboration with the University of Nottingham and Zeneca (36).

Biotechnology in cheese production: enzymes produced by micro-organisms provide an alternative to animal rennet a cheese coagulant - and an alternative supply for cheese makers. This also eliminates possible public concerns with animal-derived material, although there is currently no plans to develop synthetic milk, thus making this argument less compelling. Enzymes offer an animal-friendly alternative to animal rennet. While providing comparable quality, they are theoretically also less expensive.

About 85 million tons of wheat flour is used every year to bake bread. By adding an enzyme called maltogenic amylase to the flour, bread stays fresher longer. Assuming that 10-15% of bread is thrown away, if it could just stay fresh another 57 days then 2 million tons of flour per year would be saved. That corresponds to 40% of the bread consumed in a country such as the USA. This means more bread becomes available with no increase in input. In combination with other enzymes, bread can also be made bigger, more appetizing and better in a range of ways.

Most of the current commercial applications of modern biotechnology in agriculture are on reducing the dependence of farmers on agrochemicals. For example, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a soil bacterium that produces a protein with insecticidal qualities. Traditionally, a fermentation process has been used to produce an insecticidal spray from these bacteria. In this form, the Bt toxin occurs as an inactive protoxin, which requires digestion by an insect to be effective. There are several Bt toxins and each one is specific to certain target insects. Crop plants have now been engineered to contain and express the genes for Bt toxin, which they produce in its active form. When a susceptible insect ingests the transgenic crop cultivar expressing the Bt protein, it stops feeding and soon thereafter dies as a result of the Bt toxin binding to its gut wall. Bt corn is now commercially available in a number of countries to control corn borer (a lepidopteran insect), which is otherwise controlled by spraying (a more difficult process).

Crops have also been genetically engineered to acquire tolerance to broad-spectrum herbicide. The lack of cost-effective herbicides with broad-spectrum activity and no crop injury was a consistent limitation in crop weed management. Multiple applications of numerous herbicides were routinely used to control a wide range of weed species detrimental to agronomic crops. Weed management tended to rely on preemergence that is, herbicide applications were sprayed in response to expected weed infestations rather than in response to actual weeds present. Mechanical cultivation and hand weeding were often necessary to control weeds not controlled by herbicide applications. The introduction of herbicide tolerant crops has the potential of reducing the number of herbicide active ingredients used for weed management, reducing the number of herbicide applications made during a season, and increasing yield due to improved weed management and less crop injury. Transgenic crops that express tolerance to glyphosate, glufosinate and bromoxynil have been developed. These herbicides can now be sprayed on transgenic crops without inflicting damage on the crops while killing nearby weeds (37).

From 1996 to 2001, herbicide tolerance was the most dominant trait introduced to commercially available transgenic crops, followed by insect resistance. In 2001, herbicide tolerance deployed in soybean, corn and cotton accounted for 77% of the 626,000 square kilometres planted to transgenic crops; Bt crops accounted for 15%; and "stacked genes" for herbicide tolerance and insect resistance used in both cotton and corn accounted for 8% (38).

Biotechnology is being applied for novel uses other than food. For example, oilseed can be modified to produce fatty acids for detergents, substitute fuels and petrochemicals. Potatos, tomatos, rice, tobacco, lettuce, safflowers, and other plants have been genetically-engineered to produce insulin and certain vaccines. If future clinical trials prove successful, the advantages of edible vaccines would be enormous, especially for developing countries. The transgenic plants may be grown locally and cheaply. Homegrown vaccines would also avoid logistical and economic problems posed by having to transport traditional preparations over long distances and keeping them cold while in transit. And since they are edible, they will not need syringes, which are not only an additional expense in the traditional vaccine preparations but also a source of infections if contaminated. In the case of insulin grown in transgenic plants, it is well-established that the gastrointestinal system breaks the protein down therefore this could not currently be administered as an edible protein. However, it might be produced at significantly lower cost than insulin produced in costly, bioreactors. For example, Calgary, Canada-based SemBioSys Genetics, Inc. reports that its safflower-produced insulin will reduce unit costs by over 25% or more and reduce the capital costs associated with building a commercial-scale insulin manufacturing facility by approximately over $100 million compared to traditional biomanufacturing facilities.

There is another side to the agricultural biotechnology issue however. It includes increased herbicide usage and resultant herbicide resistance, "super weeds," residues on and in food crops, genetic contamination of non-GM crops which hurt organic and conventional farmers, damage to wildlife from glyphosate, etc.

Biotechnological engineering or biological engineering is a branch of engineering that focuses on biotechnologies and biological science. It includes different disciplines such as biochemical engineering, biomedical engineering, bio-process engineering, biosystem engineering and so on. Because of the novelty of the field, the definition of a bioengineer is still undefined. However, in general it is an integrated approach of fundamental biological sciences and traditional engineering principles.

Bioengineers are often employed to scale up bio processes from the laboratory scale to the manufacturing scale. Moreover, as with most engineers, they often deal with management, economic and legal issues. Since patents and regulation (e.g. FDA regulation in the U.S.) are very important issues for biotech enterprises, bioengineers are often required to have knowledge related to these issues.

The increasing number of biotech enterprises is likely to create a need for bioengineers in the years to come. Many universities throughout the world are now providing programs in bioengineering and biotechnology (as independent programs or specialty programs within more established engineering fields)..

More here:
Biotechnology - Wikipedia for Schools

Read More...

Biotechnology, Undergraduate Programs, SUNY-ESF

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

Bachelor of Science Information for Enrolled Students Learn More

Biotechnology is the application of biological organisms, cells, or molecules to create products or services for the betterment of humans. The bachelor of science degree in biotechnology prepares students to tackle environmental, natural resource, agricultural and medical problems through training in molecular biology, cell biology, biochemistry, genetic engineering and related biological disciplines. As biotechnology is increasingly used to address such issues, it offers diverse career opportunities. The curriculum emphasizes the basic sciences with a strong foundation in biology, chemistry, calculus, and physics that prepares students for upper-level biology and chemistry courses, but encourages elective breadth in the social sciences, humanities, and environmental studies. The degree program provides sufficient breadth for a student to enter a clinical medical career, or other health profession. Students who complete this major will be qualified to enter the growing biotechnology-related job market or continue their studies in graduate or professional school.

The biotechnology major features a strong practical experience component. Each student is required to fulfill an internship, which could be in a local, national, or international company, medical unit, or government research laboratory. The objective of this internship is to give students experience working outside a purely academic setting. In addition, each student is required to perform one independent research project in a local, national, or international academic laboratory. The objective of the research requirement is to teach the student to develop and meet a research goal using the scientific method. During the senior year, each student is required to complete a senior project synthesis in which the results from either the internship or independent researchor bothwill be organized and presented as a seminar or poster.

In addition to ESF courses, below is a list of other courses offered at Syracuse University that can satisfy the directed electives requirement:

Originally posted here:
Biotechnology, Undergraduate Programs, SUNY-ESF

Read More...

Biotechnology | Degree Programs

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

Associate of Applied Science Advising Code: A 20 10 0

Contact: (336) 334-4822, ext. 50357

The Biotechnology curriculum is designed to meet the increasing demands for skilled laboratory technicians in various fields of biological and chemical technology.

Course work emphasizes biology, chemistry, mathematics and technical communications. The curriculum objectives are designed to prepare graduates to serve in three distinct capacities: research assistant to a biologist or chemist; laboratory technician/ instrumentation technician; and quality control/quality assurance technician.

Graduates may find employment in various areas of industry and government including research and development, manufacturing, sales, and customer service.

The Biotechnology Program at GTCC is a collaborative educational program offered by Alamance Community College (ACC) and GTCC. Students are able to complete the first two semesters, as well as some selected general education courses from the second year, at GTCC. Students who successfully complete at least the first two semesters at GTCC will be admitted to the Alamance Community College program and will be able to complete the program requirements at ACC. Alamance Community College will award the Associate of Applied Science degree to all students who meet degree requirements.

Program Outcomes:

Additional Biology courses including BIO 250 Genetics and BIO 275 Microbiology can be taken at GTCC for credit at ACC.

See the rest here:
Biotechnology | Degree Programs

Read More...

Biotechnology – Columbia University

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

Degree Programs: Full-Time/Part-Time: Free-Standing M.A.

Columbia Universitys Master of Arts in Biotechnology trains students in modern aspects of molecular biology with a particular emphasis on approaches used in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. The curriculum focuses on the basic principles of biotechnology and specific applications in various fields. The use of biotechnology to fight disease is emphasized.

Thirty (30) points of course work plus a masters thesis are required for the M.A. in Biotechnology. The coursework includes three core courses, intensive laboratory experience and elective courses selected from the Department of Biological Sciences and a variety of other departments according to the students specific interests. The thesis includes a review of a topic in biotechnology. The program can be completed by full-time students in one year including the summer term or at a reduced pace by part-time students.

Research career in biotechnology:Anyone interested in becoming a research scientist in biotechnology will benefit from this program. The program covers basic and advanced aspects of biotechnology and allows students to start careers in research and development in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries.

Moderate biology background: Students with a moderate biology background have the opportunity to extend their course work in biotechnology and biological sciences and continue in these fields.

Regulatory affairs: Those interested in regulatory affairs and management in the biotechnology industry are able to enhance their previous or future training in these fields with a firm scientific background.

Management, investment, and patent law: Professionals in management, investment and patent law in the biotechnology industry are able to extend their knowledge of the science behind this industry, enabling them to make better decisions regarding this rapidly developing field.

Students wishing to apply for an M.D. or Ph.D.: Students interested in M.D. or Ph.D. programs are able to explore the field of biotechnology with a relatively short time commitment and increase their prospects for admission to top programs.

Read the original:
Biotechnology - Columbia University

Read More...

Personalized Medicine: How the Human Genome Era Will Usher …

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

Personalized Medicine: How the Human Genome Era Will Usher in a Health Care Revolution

Personalized medicine has the potential to transform healthcare through earlier diagnosis, more effective prevention and treatment of disease, and avoidance of drug side effects. The challenge for policymakers will be to deal intelligently and comprehensively with the array of issues that will affect quality of healthcare under this new paradigm.

On February 10, 2005, NHGRI Director Dr. Francis Collins, the senior advisor on genomics in the Federal government, outlined his vision for the future of genomics-based medicine to the Personalized Medicine Coalition (PMC) at the National Press Club. He also explored the numerous policy issues that must be addressed to realize the full potential of this new area of medicine.

To view the integrated presentation of both video and Power Point slides, go to:

For Web browsers other than IE or Netscape, go to the lecture webcast on the PMC Web site at:

Last Updated: March 17, 2012

See the rest here:
Personalized Medicine: How the Human Genome Era Will Usher ...

Read More...

Rutgers New Jersey Medical School

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

Welcome to the web site of The Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science at the New Jersey Medical School in Newark, New Jersey. The Institute comprises ophthalmic surgeons, researchers, ophthalmic surgeons-in-training, administrators, and ancillary staff (such as ophthalmic technicians). We are dedicated to providing outstanding compassionate patient care, teaching current and future providers of eye care, and developing cures for blindness. This site provides comprehensive information on our faculty members, eye-care professionals, patient-care services, research, residency training programs, and continuing education curriculum.

The Institute's physician-professors have exceptional clinical skills and distinguished educational backgrounds. The faculty's National Eye Institutesupported basic science and clinical research, their scientific publications and textbooks, and their leadership role in developing teaching material for the American Academy of Ophthalmology all attest to excellence within their areas of specialization. Because the faculty work in close physical proximity, patients are readily afforded consultation from our many ophthalmic subspecialists. The Institute features the most sophisticated diagnostic equipment (housed in the Ocular Imaging Center and in the Ophthalmic Electrodiagnostic Laboratory) and the most advanced therapies available.

The Institute's fully accredited ophthalmology residency training program is conducted at the New Jersey Medical School, which includes the outpatient facility at the Doctors Office Center and University Hospital in Newark, NJ, and at two affiliate hospitals: the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in East Orange, NJ, and the Jersey City Medical Center in Jersey City, NJ. The residency program provides outstanding clinical training in both the surgical and medical aspects of ophthalmology, including certification in refractive surgery.

In sum, the spectrum of activities undertaken by the Institute's members is at the highest level of expertise and is comprehensive, encompassing all aspects of vision care and training of vision care professionals. We hope this site will answer many of your questions about the Institute, its mission, its activities, and its personnel.

View original post here:
Rutgers New Jersey Medical School

Read More...

Stem cells from teeth can make brain-like cells …

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

University of Adelaide researchers have discovered that stem cells taken from teeth can grow to resemble brain cells, suggesting they could one day be used in the brain as a therapy for stroke.

In the University's Centre for Stem Cell Research, laboratory studies have shown that stem cells from teeth can develop and form complex networks of brain-like cells. Although these cells haven't developed into fully fledged neurons, researchers believe it's just a matter of time and the right conditions for it to happen.

"Stem cells from teeth have great potential to grow into new brain or nerve cells, and this could potentially assist with treatments of brain disorders, such as stroke," says Dr Kylie Ellis, Commercial Development Manager with the University's commercial arm, Adelaide Research & Innovation (ARI).

Dr Ellis conducted this research as part of her Physiology PhD studies at the University, before making the step into commercialisation. The results of her work have been published in the journal Stem Cell Research & Therapy.

"The reality is, treatment options available to the thousands of stroke patients every year are limited," Dr Ellis says. "The primary drug treatment available must be administered within hours of a stroke and many people don't have access within that timeframe, because they often can't seek help for some time after the attack.

"Ultimately, we want to be able to use a patient's own stem cells for tailor-made brain therapy that doesn't have the host rejection issues commonly associated with cell-based therapies. Another advantage is that dental pulp stem cell therapy may provide a treatment option available months or even years after the stroke has occurred," she says.

Dr Ellis and her colleagues, Professors Simon Koblar, David O'Carroll and Stan Gronthos, have been working on a laboratory-based model for actual treatment in humans. As part of this research Dr Ellis found that stem cells derived from teeth developed into cells that closely resembled neurons.

"We can do this by providing an environment for the cells that is as close to a normal brain environment as possible, so that instead of becoming cells for teeth they become brain cells," Dr Ellis says.

"What we developed wasn't identical to normal neurons, but the new cells shared very similar properties to neurons. They also formed complex networks and communicated through simple electrical activity, like you might see between cells in the developing brain."

This work with dental pulp stem cells opens up the potential for modelling many more common brain disorders in the laboratory, which could help in developing new treatments and techniques for patients.

Story Source:

The above post is reprinted from materials provided by University of Adelaide. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.

The rest is here:
Stem cells from teeth can make brain-like cells ...

Read More...

Immune System – kidshealth.org

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

The immune system, which is made up of special cells, proteins, tissues, and organs, defends people against germs and microorganisms every day. In most cases, the immune system does a great job of keeping people healthy and preventing infections. But sometimes problems with the immune system can lead to illness and infection.

The immune system is the body's defense against infectious organisms and other invaders. Through a series of steps called the immune response, the immune system attacks organisms and substances that invade body systems and cause disease.

The immune system is made up of a network of cells, tissues, and organs that work together to protect the body. One of the important cells involved are white blood cells, also called leukocytes, which come in two basic types that combine to seek out and destroy disease-causing organisms or substances.

Leukocytes are produced or stored in many locations in the body, including the thymus, spleen, and bone marrow. For this reason, they're called the lymphoid organs. There are also clumps of lymphoid tissue throughout the body, primarily as lymph nodes, that house the leukocytes.

The leukocytes circulate through the body between the organs and nodes via lymphatic vessels and blood vessels. In this way, the immune system works in a coordinated manner to monitor the body for germs or substances that might cause problems.

The two basic types of leukocytes are:

A number of different cells are considered phagocytes. The most common type is the neutrophil, whichprimarily fights bacteria. If doctors are worried about a bacterial infection, they might order a blood test to see if a patient has an increased number of neutrophils triggered by the infection. Other types of phagocytes have their own jobs to make sure that the body responds appropriately to a specific type of invader.

The two kinds of lymphocytes are B lymphocytes and T lymphocytes. Lymphocytes start out in the bone marrow and either stay there and mature into B cells, or they leave for the thymus gland, where they mature into T cells. B lymphocytes and T lymphocytes have separate functions: B lymphocytes are like the body's military intelligence system, seeking out their targets and sending defenses to lock onto them. T cells are like the soldiers, destroying the invaders that the intelligence system has identified.

When antigens (foreign substances that invade the body) are detected, several types of cells work together to recognize themand respond. These cells trigger the B lymphocytes to produce antibodies, which are specialized proteins that lock onto specific antigens.

Once produced, these antibodies stay in a person's body, so that if his or herimmune system encounters that antigen again, the antibodies are already there to do their job. So if someone gets sick with a certain disease, like chickenpox, that person usually won't get sick from it again.

This is also how immunizations prevent certain diseases. An immunization introduces the body to an antigen in a way that doesn't make someone sick, but does allow the body to produce antibodies that will then protect the person from future attack by the germ or substance that produces that particular disease.

Although antibodies can recognize an antigen and lock onto it, they are not capable of destroying it without help. That's the job of the T cells, which are part of the system that destroys antigens that have been tagged by antibodies or cells that have been infected or somehow changed. (Some T cells are actually called "killer cells.") T cells also are involved in helping signal other cells (like phagocytes) to do their jobs.

Antibodies also can neutralize toxins (poisonous or damaging substances) produced by different organisms. Lastly, antibodies can activate a group of proteins called complement that are also part of the immune system. Complement assists in killing bacteria, viruses, or infected cells.

All of these specialized cells and parts of the immune system offer the body protection against disease. This protection is called immunity.

See the original post:
Immune System - kidshealth.org

Read More...

Sports Medicine | Eastern Oklahoma Orthopedic Center

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

Due to their dynamic nature, sports injuries require specialized methods of treatment.

Whether youre a weekend warrior or a high school, college, or professional athlete and obtain an injury, you need to see a doctor with the highest level of training and experience in sports medicine.

At Eastern Oklahoma Orthopedic Center, our sports medicine doctors take a team approach in helping you return to your favorite sports and activities. Our sports medicine doctors are trained in the treatment and care of sports-related injuries and conditions, such as torn ligaments (ACL and MCL), torn cartilage (meniscus), joint instability, muscle weakness, sprains, and fractures.

If you are suffering from a sport-related pain or have a sports injury or condition, consult with one of our sports medicine doctors at Eastern Oklahoma Orthopedic Center by calling(800) 283-3662or click on theAppointment Requestbutton.

Our sports medicine surgeons at Eastern Oklahoma Orthopedic Center have completed additional training, specifically in sports medicine. With this advanced training, our sports medicine surgeons, Dr.George S. Mauerman, Dr. T. Jeffrey Emel, Dr. Alan G. Lewis, Dr. Bradford L. Boone, Dr. Scott E. Rahhal, Dr. Jay Darin Lorton, Dr. Steven R. Hardage, and Dr. Ryan A. Pitts, havethe training, experience, and expertise to assess, diagnose, and treat your sports medicine injury individually to your needs.

To consult with a sports medicine surgeon at Eastern Oklahoma Orthopedic Center, please call(800) 283-3662or click on theAppointment Requestbutton.

Here is the original post:
Sports Medicine | Eastern Oklahoma Orthopedic Center

Read More...

Page 18«..10..17181920..3040..»


2025 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick