header logo image


Page 28«..1020..27282930..»

Archive for April, 2020

Research on Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market (impact of COVID-19) 2020-2026 Spark Therapeutics, Freeline Therapeutics, Sangamo Therapeutics, Ultragenyx…

Saturday, April 11th, 2020

Detailed market survey on the Global Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market Research Report 2020-2026. It analyses the vital factors of the Hemophilia Gene Therapy market supported present business Strategy, Hemophilia Gene Therapy market demands, business methods utilised by Hemophilia Gene Therapy market players and therefore the future prospects from numerous angles well. Business associatealysis could be a market assessment tool utilized by business and analysts to grasp the quality of an business. Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market report It helps them get a sense of what is happening in an industry, i.e., demand-supply statistics, Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market degree of competition within the industry, Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market competition of the business with different rising industries, future prospects of the business.

NOTE: Hemophilia Gene Therapy reports include the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this industry. Our new sample is updated which correspond in new report showing impact of Covid-19 on Industry trends. Also we are offering 20% discount

Obtain sample copy of Hemophilia Gene Therapy market report: https://calibreresearch.com/report/global-hemophilia-gene-therapy-market-4387#request-sample

The Global Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market report is a fully analyzed and intelligent study of the international industry that focuses on a wide range of significant elements such as market size in terms of value and volume, regional growth analysis, competition and segmentation. It is considered as extraordinary findings that accountable to offer insightful details into some essential attributes related to the global Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market 2020. The detailed investigation of this report has been carried out by the list of skillful researchers and investigators with a deep analysis of current industry trends, availability of distinct opportunities, drivers, openings and limitation that influence the Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market on the global scale.

The Global Hemophilia Gene Therapy market worth about xx billion USD in 2020 and it is expected to reach xx billion USD in 2026 with an average growth rate of x%. United States is the largest production of Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market and consumption region in the world, Europe also play important roles in global Hemophilia Gene Therapy market while China is fastest growing region.

Checkout Inquiry For Buying or Customization of Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market Report: https://calibreresearch.com/report/global-hemophilia-gene-therapy-market-4387#inquiry-for-buying

Geographically, Hemophilia Gene Therapy market report is segmented into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue. The major regions involved in Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market are (United States, EU, China, and Japan).

Leading companies reviewed in the Hemophilia Gene Therapy report are:

Spark TherapeuticsFreeline TherapeuticsSangamo TherapeuticsUltragenyxuniQureShire PLCBioMarinBioverativ

Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market Product Type Segmentation As Provided Below:The Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market report is segmented into following categories:

The product segment of the report offers product market information such as demand, supply and market value of the product.

The application of product in terms of USD value is represented in numerical and graphical format for all the major regional markets.The Hemophilia Gene Therapy market report is segmented into Type by following categories;Hemophilia AHemophilia B

The Hemophilia Gene Therapy market report is segmented into Application by following categories;Hemophilia A Gene TherapyHemophilia B Gene Therapy

Reportedly, the massive growth graph in the research and development sectors will be liable to generate plenty of excellent opportunities in the upcoming years. The Hemophilia Gene Therapy market is a valuable resource of insightful information for specific business strategists. Apart from this, it also offers an in-depth summary of the Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market along with growth assessment, revenue share, demand & supply data, historical as well as futuristic amount etc. A group of research analysts offers a detailed description of the value chain and its distributors info. Moreover, the Hemophilia Gene Therapy market study report delivers comprehensive information regarding the global industry that enhances the scope, understanding and application of the same.

Checkout FREE Report Sample of Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market Report for Better Understanding: https://calibreresearch.com/report/global-hemophilia-gene-therapy-market-4387#request-sample

Industry analysis, for an entrepreneur or a company, is a method that helps it to understand its position relative to other participants in the Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market. It helps them to identify both the opportunities and threats coming their way and gives them a strong idea of the present and future scenario of the Hemophilia Gene Therapy industry. The key to extant during this changing business setting is to know the variations between yourself and your competitors within the Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market. The deep research study of Hemophilia Gene Therapy market based on development opportunities, growth limiting factors and feasibility of investment will forecast the Hemophilia Gene Therapy market growth.

Finally, The global research document on the Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market discovers a large set of information regarding the competitive business environment and other substantial components. The prime aim of these major competitors is to focus on improved technologies and newer innovations.

More:
Research on Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market (impact of COVID-19) 2020-2026 Spark Therapeutics, Freeline Therapeutics, Sangamo Therapeutics, Ultragenyx...

Read More...

Cancer Gene Therapy Market Scope Analysis 2019-2025 – Science In Me

Saturday, April 11th, 2020

Global Cancer Gene Therapy Market is valued at USD XX million in 2019 and is projected to reach USD XX million by the end of 2025, growing at a CAGR of XX% during the period 2019 to 2025.

The report titled Global Cancer Gene Therapy Market is one of the most comprehensive and important additions to QY Researchs archive of market research studies. It offers detailed research and analysis of key aspects of the global Cancer Gene Therapy market. The market analysts authoring this report have provided in-depth information on leading growth drivers, restraints, challenges, trends, and opportunities to offer a complete analysis of the global Cancer Gene Therapy market. Market participants can use the analysis on market dynamics to plan effective growth strategies and prepare for future challenges beforehand. Each trend of the global Cancer Gene Therapy market is carefully analyzed and researched about by the market analysts.

Request Sample Report @ https://www.researchmoz.com/enquiry.php?type=S&repid=2081748&source=atm

The Essential Content Covered in the Global Cancer Gene Therapy Market Report:

In terms of region, this research report covers almost all the major regions across the globe such as North America, Europe, South America, the Middle East, and Africa and the Asia Pacific. Europe and North America regions are anticipated to show an upward growth in the years to come. While Cancer Gene Therapy Market in Asia Pacific regions is likely to show remarkable growth during the forecasted period. Cutting edge technology and innovations are the most important traits of the North America region and thats the reason most of the time the US dominates the global markets. Cancer Gene Therapy Market in South, America region is also expected to grow in near future.

The key players covered in this studyAdaptimmuneBluebird bioCelgeneShanghai Sunway BiotechShenzhen SiBiono GeneTechSynerGene TherapeuticsAltor BioScienceAmgenArgenxBioCancellGlaxoSmithKlineMerckOncoGenex PharmaceuticalsTransgene

Market segment by Type, the product can be split intoOncolytic VirotherapyGene TransferGene-Induced Immunotherapy

Market segment by Application, split intoHospitalsDiagnostics CentersResearch Institutes

Market segment by Regions/Countries, this report coversUnited StatesEuropeChinaJapanSoutheast AsiaIndiaCentral & South America

Make An EnquiryAbout This Report @ https://www.researchmoz.com/enquiry.php?type=E&repid=2081748&source=atm

Key questions answered in the report

*What will be the market size in terms of value and volume in the next five years?

*Which segment is currently leading the market?

*In which region will the market find its highest growth?

*Which players will take the lead in the market?

*What are the key drivers and restraints of the markets growth?

We provide detailed product mapping and analysis of various market scenarios. Our analysts are experts in providing in-depth analysis and breakdown of the business of key market leaders. We keep a close eye on recent developments and follow latest company news related to different players operating in the global Cancer Gene Therapy market. This helps us to deeply analyze companies as well as the competitive landscape. Our vendor landscape analysis offers a complete study that will help you to stay on top of the competition.

Table of Contents

1 Cancer Gene Therapy Market Overview

1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Cancer Gene Therapy

1.2 Cancer Gene Therapy Segment by Type

1.2.1 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Production Growth Rate Comparison by Type 2020 VS 2026

1.3 Cancer Gene Therapy Segment by Application

1.3.1 Cancer Gene Therapy Consumption Comparison by Application: 2020 VS 2026

1.4 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Market by Region

1.4.1 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Market Size Estimates and Forecasts by Region: 2020 VS 2026

1.4.2 North America Estimates and Forecasts (2015-2026)

1.4.3 Europe Estimates and Forecasts (2015-2026)

1.4.4 China Estimates and Forecasts (2015-2026)

1.4.5 Japan Estimates and Forecasts (2015-2026)

1.5 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Growth Prospects

1.5.1 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Revenue Estimates and Forecasts (2015-2026)

1.5.2 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Production Capacity Estimates and Forecasts (2015-2026)

1.5.3 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Production Estimates and Forecasts (2015-2026)

2 Market Competition by Manufacturers

2.1 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Production Capacity Market Share by Manufacturers (2015-2020)

2.2 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2015-2020)

2.3 Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)

2.4 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Average Price by Manufacturers (2015-2020)

2.5 Manufacturers Cancer Gene Therapy Production Sites, Area Served, Product Types

2.6 Cancer Gene Therapy Market Competitive Situation and Trends

2.6.1 Cancer Gene Therapy Market Concentration Rate

2.6.2 Global Top 3 and Top 5 Players Market Share by Revenue

2.6.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion

3 Production Capacity by Region

4 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Consumption by Regions

5 Production, Revenue, Price Trend by Type

5.1 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Production Market Share by Type (2015-2020)

5.2 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Revenue Market Share by Type (2015-2020)

5.3 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Price by Type (2015-2020)

5.4 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Market Share by Price Tier (2015-2020): Low-End, Mid-Range and High-End

6 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Market Analysis by Application

6.1 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Consumption Market Share by Application (2015-2020)

6.2 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Consumption Growth Rate by Application (2015-2020)

Read More..

You can Buy This Report from Here @ https://www.researchmoz.com/checkout?rep_id=2081748&licType=S&source=atm

Here is the original post:
Cancer Gene Therapy Market Scope Analysis 2019-2025 - Science In Me

Read More...

BioIVT Opens New Blood Donor Center to Support Boston-area Research into COVID-19 Therapies, Vaccines and Diagnostics – Bio-IT World

Saturday, April 11th, 2020

Located on the Tufts University Medford, MA campus, this new donor center will enable delivery of fresh blood, leukopaks and buffy coats for COVID-19, cell and gene therapy research within hours of collection

WESTBURY, NY - Apr 6, 2020 - BioIVT, a leading provider of research models and services for drug and diagnostic development, today announced the opening of its new blood donor center on the Tufts University campus in Medford, MA to support academic and pharmaceutical researchers involved in COVID-19, cell and gene therapy research.

BioIVT wants to play a leading role in supporting COVID-19 research efforts and blood donations are a vital resource for the research and development of new therapies, vaccines, and diagnostics. We have many years experience developing blood products, including blood-derived immune cells for cell and gene therapy research, and we want to make that expertise count, said BioIVT CEO Jeff Gatz. Researchers recognize and appreciate BioIVTs rapid response and commitment to high quality, fresh blood products and this new donor center will allow us to offer those attributes and services to additional US clients.

BioIVTs new Boston blood donor center is its seventh. The company has similar facilities located in California, Tennessee and Pennsylvania to serve US clients and in London, UK for EU-based clients.

While the initial focus at our Boston donor center will be on delivering fresh blood, leukopaks and buffy coats within hours of collection, we plan to add more capabilities and donors over time, said Jeff Widdoss, Vice President of Donor Center Operations at BioIVT.

Leukopaks, which contain concentrated white blood cells, are used to help identify promising new drug candidates, assess toxicity levels, and conduct stem cell and gene therapy research. They are particularly useful for researchers who need to obtain large numbers of leukocytes from a single donor.

BioIVT blood products can be supplied with specific clinical data, such as the donor age, ethnicity, gender, BMI and smoking status. Its leukopaks are also human leukocyte antigen (HLA), FC receptor and cytomegalovirus typed. HLA typing is used to match patients and donors for bone marrow or cord blood transplants. FC receptors play an important role in antibody-dependent immune responses.

COVID-19-related Precautions

Blood donor centers are considered essential businesses and will remain open during the COVID-19 quarantine. BioIVT is taking additional safety measures to protect both blood donors and its staff during this difficult time. It has instituted several social distancing measures, including increasing the space between chairs in the waiting room and between donor beds, and limiting the entrance of non-essential personnel. The screening rooms are disinfected between donors and all areas of the center continue to be cleaned at regular intervals.

As soon as each blood donor signs their informed consent form, their temperature is taken. If they have a fever, their appointment is postponed, and they are referred to their physician. Any donor who develops COVID-19 symptoms after donating blood is required to inform the center immediately.

All BioIVT blood collections are conducted under institutional review board (IRB) oversight and according to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations and American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) guidelines.

Those who would like to donate blood at BioIVTs new Boston-area donor center should call 1-833-GO-4-CURE or visit http://www.biospecialty.com to make an appointment.

Further information about the products available from BioIVTs new donor center can be found at https://info.bioivt.com/ma-donor-ctr-req.

About BioIVT

BioIVT is a leading global provider of research models and value-added research services for drug discovery and development. We specialize in control and disease-state biospecimens including human and animal tissues, cell products, blood and other biofluids. Our unmatched portfolio of clinical specimens directly supports precision medicine research and the effort to improve patient outcomes by coupling comprehensive clinical data with donor samples. Our PHASEZERO Research Services team works collaboratively with clients to provide target and biomarker validation, phenotypic assays to characterize novel therapeutics, clinical assay development and in vitro hepatic modeling solutions. And as the premier supplier of hepatic products, including hepatocytes and subcellular fractions, BioIVT enables scientists to better understand the pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism of newly-discovered compounds and their effects on disease processes. By combining our technical expertise, exceptional customer service, and unparalleled access to biological specimens, BioIVT serves the research community as a trusted partner in elevating science. For more information, please visit http://www.bioivt.com or follow the company on Twitter @BioIVT.

Excerpt from:
BioIVT Opens New Blood Donor Center to Support Boston-area Research into COVID-19 Therapies, Vaccines and Diagnostics - Bio-IT World

Read More...

The Hopes and Challenges of a COVID-19 Vaccine – BioSpace

Saturday, April 11th, 2020

While the world is working to slow the COVID-19 pandemic by social isolation and quarantine, numerous companies globally are working to develop a vaccine against the virus. The most likely timelinesat bestfor a viable vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus causing COVID-19, are 12 to 18 months. And thats if everything goes right.

As a recent article in Bloomberg Businessweek notes, For that to happen in the next year or so, an almost equally implausible set of circumstances has to occur: flawless scientific execution, breakneck trials and a military-style manufacturing mobilization unlike any the pharmaceutical industry has put in place before.

Typically, it takes 10 to 15 years of deliberate and careful work to develop a commercial vaccineand as both the common cold and HIV have demonstrated, sometimes its not possible even then. The infrastructure for the seasonal flu vaccines that come out every year has been in place for decades.

One of the companies that is gaining a lot of attention is Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Moderna. They have a head-start and are using a novel technology to develop their COVID-19 vaccine, mRNA-1273, which is already in clinical trials. mRNA-1273 is a mRNA vaccine that encodes for a prefusion stabilized form of the Spike (S) protein. Whats different about the vaccine is that it is almost like a form of gene therapyit codes for the genetic sequence for the spike protein, and when injected into the body, causes the patients own cells to produce the protein (not the virus), which triggers an immune reaction that will prep itself to battle the virus.

The technology is interesting, but unproven. There are no approved RNA therapies. And Moderna has never brought a product to the market before.

One thing thats of note is how early a start Moderna got on the vaccine. On January 11, 2020, Chinese researchers posted the genetic sequence of the coronavirus, well before most of the world was paying any attention. Moderna scientists had been working on a novel vaccine for a different coronavirus disease and jumped on this sequence and began working on a vaccine against it.

Bloomberg writes, By late February, when President Trump was still downplaying the risk of coronavirus, Modernas scientists had already delivered the first batch of candidate vaccines to researchers at the U.S. National institutes of Health. When the coronavirus was starting to explode in the U.S. in mid-March, the first healthy patient received a dose in a small, government-sponsored safety trial.

Moderna may be the leader, but they are not the only company employing this technology. Pfizer and a few others are as well. Pfizer is working with a German company, BioNTech, hoping to get their experimental RNA vaccine into human trials sometime this month.

Johnson & Johnson is using technology it employed for its experimental Zika and Ebola vaccine. Paris-based Sanofi is modifying technology it uses for its flu shots. There are more than two dozen companies working on coronavirus vaccines that are already in early-stage testing.

There is no precedent for the speed at which we are moving, said Clement Lewin, an associate vice president at Sanofi. I cant think of a parallel, in his thirty years of vaccine work.

The RNA vaccine technology, despite the apparent speed with which Moderna, Pfizer and BioNTech are moving, has some risks. Not as much is known about its efficacy. Early-stage data suggests it should be safe, but there are concerns about unwanted immune responses. And all vaccines run a risk of what is called disease enhancement, where the immune system responds in an unusual way, which can cause the illness to be worse.

It's possible that any vaccines just wont be effective, or the side effects will be such that they wont be considered safe for use.

Scale-up is also a major roadblock. As of April 7, there are 1,362,936 confirmed cases of COVID-19 around the globe. But there are another 8 billion possible people who would possibly benefit from a vaccine.

Under a scenario where Modernas vaccine turns out to be effective and safe, no one has experience in commercial production of RNA vaccines, let alone in the type of scale necessary. The company indicates it has the manufacturing capability to produce millions of doses of the vaccine per month at a factory that was already scaling up for a different vaccine. They are apparently also in discussions with possible partners. But millions is a very long way from producing vaccines for billions of peopleor even a few hundred million people.

If a vaccine were to become available in the next year, an optimistic timeline, the first candidates for the drug would be first-line respondersdoctors, nurses, paramedics, as well as infants, toddlers and pregnant women. Thats a figure that exceeds 26 million people in the U.S. alone.

The next round would be essential personnel and children with preexisting conditions, higher-risk patients and people over the age of 65. Once you add all those, just in the U.S., youre talking more than 100 million who would be considered high-priority for a vaccine.

Mark Feinberg, a former Merck & Co. executive in vaccines who now runs the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, told Bloomberg that the real question wasnt just efficacy, but how quickly can you ramp up manufacturing to meet global need.

There arent a lot of drugs in the industry that are filled at these scales, period, said Stephen Hoge, president of Moderna. Even large pharma companies dont usually operate on this kind of scale. No one entity or one company will be able to do it by themselves.

With any luck, social distancing and quarantine will slow the spread of the virus. Perhaps the coming summer months will also decrease its spread, although whether there is a seasonality component to the disease is still unknown. This would give biopharma companies a little more room to develop and distribute vaccines or to determine which drugs are best-suited to preventing or treating the disease.

Meanwhile, biopharma companies worldwide are working desperately to develop solutions.

More here:
The Hopes and Challenges of a COVID-19 Vaccine - BioSpace

Read More...

Wally meets Dawn Astle: England striker’s daughter campaigned for the truth behind her dad’s death – Mirror Online

Saturday, April 11th, 2020

Not for the squeamish, it was unmissable science in action.

The dissection of a human brain unlocks more secrets about a person's character than we could conceal in a treasure trove of love letters.

Your correspondent was privileged to watch Steve Gentleman, a professor of neuropathology at Imperial College London, decipher the code of neurons, stem cells and blood vessels in one preserved encephalon at the Parkinson's UK Brain Bank.

One day, his research into neurodegenerative diseases and traumatic head injury, based on the donation of human brains, could stop the march of Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and other insidious enemies.

Former England striker Jeff Astle donated his brain, in the name of medical science, after his death at the age of 59.

Better late than never, it revealed the concussive effects of heading leather footballs, which became more like boulders when wet, and turned his family's campaign for essential research into the subject from a lit torch into a raging bushfire.

Fifty years ago this month, Astle finished the season as leading scorer in English football's top flight.

His 25 goals for West Brom earned him a place in Sir Alf Ramsey's England squad, not to mention as a prominent voice among the players performing their 1970 World Cup anthem Back Home in tuxedos on Top of the Pops.

The tenacity of his family, led by Astle's daughter Dawn, in pursuit of the truth behind his death has shone a light in some uncomfortable corners for the game.

If the PFA players' union and the FA were slow to wake up to links between heading footballs and neurodegenerative disorders, they are wide awake now.

By dying, and donating his brain for medical research, my dad now speaks for the living, said Dawn.

Before the end, he didn't even know he had been a footballer. Everything that football gave him England caps, the winner in an FA Cup final football took away again.

Even in his prime, he didn't really have many opinions about anything. Normally, he was so easy-going he never got worked up about politics or anything controversial his glass was always half-full.

But years before he fell ill, he watched a programme on TV about organ donation and suddenly he piped up, 'I don't understand why people wouldn't donate parts of their body after they pass away they are no good to you when you are gone.'

He was unusually passionate about it, so we had no hesitation in offering his brain to medical science.

Without that donation, we would never have known that, in the end, his brain looked like the brain of a boxer.

When he died in January 2002 aged 59, Astle's health had already been in manifest decline for four years, his brain damaged by repeated heading of leather footballs.

The coroner's verdict death by industrial disease - immediately rang alarm bells with his family.

We knew my dad couldn't possibly be the only one, said Dawn. He died on my birthday, in my house, choking on my food, and the image haunts me to this day.

But when you go through something so traumatic, it hardens your resolve to find the truth.

It would take 12 years before the family arranged with Dr Willie Stewart, a consultant neuropathologist in Glasgow, to re-examine Astle's brain tissue.

He confirmed their deepest suspicion: Astle had not been suffering from early-onset Alzheimer's but CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopathy), a degenerative condition consistent with punch-drunk boxers.

Dr Stewart told us if he hadn't known my dad was 59, he would have thought the brain belonged to a man of 90 or more, said Dawn.

He re-examined my dad's brain in 2014 on his birthday, May 13th, and it turned out to be be best birthday present we arranged for him because it revealed the truth.

As a family, we now believe passionately in the importance of brain and other organ tissue donation for one reason: In future, it means someone else won't have to do it.

Three of England's 1966 World Cup winning squad Ray Wilson and Martin Peters, no longer with us, and Nobby Stiles, now suffering from advanced dementia - have already been struck down by the curse of neurological disintegration.

Were they all victims of the same heading trauma as Astle?

The circumstantial evidence is stacking up.

Original post:
Wally meets Dawn Astle: England striker's daughter campaigned for the truth behind her dad's death - Mirror Online

Read More...

Studies Show N.Y. Outbreak Originated in Europe – The New York Times

Saturday, April 11th, 2020

To not have any control over anything, to just be waiting and on the edge of your seat, its mind blowing at this point. Janettes fiance, Michael, is detained on Rikers Island. Hes serving time because he failed to check in with his officer, violating his parole for drug possession. Now Michael, and hundreds like him, are at the center of a public health crisis experts have been warning about for weeks. Two months owed to the city, its not worth somebodys life. Youre giving people a life sentence leaving them there. TV announcers: An inmate who tested positive for Covid-19 died yesterday at Bellevue Hospital. Rikers is one of the largest correctional facilities in the world, and right now, the infection rate there is seven times that of New York City. Is our prison system equipped to handle an outbreak? When the coronavirus seeped into the jails, public officials, public advocates all rushed to address the situation. We will continue to reduce our jail population. Were releasing people who are in jails because they violated parole. When the virus was first identified in New York, there were 5,400 inmates in city jails. To combat the spread of the virus, the Board of Correction recommended the release of 2,000 inmates. Parole violators, people over 50, those medically at risk and inmates serving short sentences. But two weeks later, government officials have released just half. Prisons, jails, are acting as incubators for the virus. Think about the jails as the worlds worst cruise ship. If we get a real situation here, and this thing starts to spread, its going to spread like wildfire, and New York is going to have a problem on their hands. Thousands of employees travel through the citys jails every day, forming a human lifeline to the city. Inmates also come and go. So its particularly urgent to get this under control because its not just about who is in the jails right now, its really about the city. This is Kenneth Albritton. He was being held on Rikers as Covid-19 spread through the city. Its scary in there, thats what I would tell you. When I was in there, you had guys making their own masks with their shirts. They didnt want to breathe in the air with the same people thats in the dorm with them. Kenneth was on parole after serving time for second-degree manslaughter when he was 18. I was brought to Rikers Island on Feb. 5 for a curfew violation. For me reading a paper and watching the news, and Im seeing that theyre saying no more than 10 to a group. But you have 50 guys thats in a sleeping area. Its impossible to tell us to practice social distancing there when theyre being stacked on top of each other. After someone in his dorm tested positive, Kenneth says he was quarantined. But less than 24 hours later, he was released. He was given a MetroCard, but no guidance about how to deal with the potential spread of Covid-19. If they would have tested me on my way out, then I would have felt like, OK, they took the proper steps. When I left the pen to come home, they told us nothing about how we should handle situation. Even though nobody told me nothing, I felt I should quarantine myself. Not much has been considered in terms of what happens to inmates after their release, and once theyre back in the communities and in their homes. When we asked about the pace of releases, the mayors office agreed it was slow, but said they dont have full control of the process. The states Department of Corrections said its working as quickly as possible. My fiance whos on Rikers, we had our son in September and about two weeks after that, he found out that he had a warrant for his arrest. Oh, you got those boogies. I told you that baby likes that camera Oh my goodness. This is a person with nonviolent charges. Its like a real health care disaster. The parolees is like the easiest thing they do. Right. Yeah, they said about 500 or 700 parolees. I just had read it last night. Yes, that he signed off on it. The outbreak at city jails doesnt just pose a threat to inmates. On March 27, Quinsey Simpson became the first New York City corrections officer to die from Covid-19. Correction officers every day, despite harm to themselves and their family, are rolling on this island to do this job. Officer Husamudeen criticizes the citys response, though hes arguing for improving jail conditions not releasing inmates. Thats not the answer to solving this problem. They havent served their time. If they served their time, they wouldnt be on parole. But his opposition is in the minority. While the overall population at Rikers has decreased, theres an unusual consensus from public defenders, prosecutors and corrections officials that the releases arent happening quickly enough. We need to reframe our thinking around public safety right now to accommodate the fact that public safety includes trying to prevent viral spread. My brother whos a New York City schoolteacher contracted the coronavirus. Are you OK? Oh, I love you. Oh, you scared? Whats the matter? Oh, God. Dont get into your head that its going to beat you. Youre going to beat this. OK? OK, I love you. OK, Ill call you in a little while. OK. As a teacher, he had a lot of precautions, and thought he was following everything he was supposed to be doing, and he contracted the coronavirus going into a school. This is why Im so adamant about fighting for Michael to get home. The person standing right next to you can have it and you wouldnt even know it. Across city jails, hundreds of inmates and corrections workers have tested positive, and half of all inmates are now under quarantine. Covid-19 and the pandemic has exposed pretty rapidly sort of all of the weakest places in our social safety nets. And it is no surprise that one of those is the ways that jails put people at risk. I know, love This is just ridiculously scary.

Read the original:
Studies Show N.Y. Outbreak Originated in Europe - The New York Times

Read More...

Searching for an effective Covid-19 treatment: promise and peril – STAT

Saturday, April 11th, 2020

In response to the most serious global health threat in a century, the worlds biomedical establishment is unleashing an unprecedented response to the Covid-19 pandemic, rapidly increasing resources aimed at finding safe and effective treatments for the disease. But without careful attention to the pitfalls that can befall biomedical research and regulatory decision-making during a time of crisis, a lot can go wrong.

On March 28, the FDA provided emergency use authorization for hydroxychloroquine a medicine approved for treating malaria for people hospitalized with Covid-19. It also however, told health providers that the optimal dose and duration of treatment were unknown. The authorization did not identify any clinical study on which this approval was based, and while hydroxychloroquine may affect viral replication and might ultimately prove beneficial, its impact on health outcomes among patients with Covid-19 is currently unclear.

Against this potentially worrisome action, the scope of the search for a new treatment to mitigate or cure Covid-19 is breathtaking. One recent listing identified more than 70 candidate molecules, including 15 antivirals, potent suppressants of the human immune system, and high-risk oncology treatments already approved by the FDA to treat other conditions.

advertisement

The National Institutes of Healths ClinicalTrials.gov lists more than 100 clinical investigations focused on Covid-19 from around the world, with sponsors that include medical centers, pharmaceutical companies, and national research institutes. In time, it is likely we will see direct-acting antivirals tailored to the most vulnerable molecular targets on the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

But this extraordinary effort is lacking international coordination, which may yield counterproductive competition among countries with biotechnology industries. The coronavirus does not respect national boundaries; neither can the development of new treatments, which are already being tested in more than 15 countries. As a first step, the biomedical community needs to insist on consistent use of central registries of clinical studies and on early sharing of complete details of both successful and failed studies, and not withhold important scientific evidence as proprietary information.

advertisement

Acting against this effort is a growing industry fueled by fear and panic. Medical history has taught us that when people get sick and scared they will take practically anything. For centuries, worthless and sometimes harmful treatments, ranging from arsenic to swamp root, have been promoted by everyone from charlatans to well-meaning clinicians.

In an emergency situation such as this one, attention will naturally turn to repurposing already available products, which makes good sense. But we need to let scientists do their jobs. In too many past cases, drugs have been widely used off-label or based on a positive response in a narrow laboratory or clinical measure only to have independent analysis later show that the treatments do more harm than good or target the wrong patient population. For example, a family of anti-arrhythmic drugs that was effective in stopping asymptomatic irregular heartbeats was subsequently found to increase the risk of cardiac arrest when given to heart attack survivors.

The biomedical establishment must speak with a clear voice about the need to adequately test new drug treatments for Covid-19 and to subject that evidence to independent evaluation by the FDA.

Other pitfalls await those too ready to embrace a new treatment. One is the power of the placebo effect. Among individuals participating in clinical trials, those unaware they are receiving an inactive placebo can show substantial improvement, sometimes equal to 80% of the apparent treatment effect of the active therapy. The placebo effect has been documented in clinical trials assessing health benefits that range from improvement in subjective psychiatric symptoms to objective laboratory results.

Who has not read media reports about an individuals miraculous recovery at the hands of a caring physician trying an entirely new approach to treatment? Independent investigation of the case confirms the striking improvement was real. But it turns out to be a dramatic example of idiosyncratic recoveries that can be neither explained nor duplicated in other patients.

The coming flood of research from trials now or soon to be underway should lead us toward realistic and objective measures of the two fundamental properties of every therapeutic drug: benefit and harm.

A drug that shows disease activity against SARS-CoV-2 could prove too toxic to give to Covid-19 patients with worsening pneumonia. A claim that a drug reduces viral load could be valid, but its health benefits or harms could depend on when in the cycle of infection it is used. A drug intended for those with mild-to-moderate symptoms but who are otherwise healthy must be of low toxicity because it will be given to many patients who might have otherwise recovered on their own, while it may be more acceptable to offer drugs with more severe toxicities to patients at higher risk of death.

Another fundamental aspect of all drug testing is encouraging when it comes to Covid-19 research. As the first antibiotics for pneumonia taught us in the 1930s, a dramatically effective treatment for an acute illness can be convincingly demonstrated in a small number of patients observed over a few weeks time. The chances of discovering and documenting such a treatment grow if we also greatly increase the number of patients enrolled in clinical studies.

In the 1980s, during the HIV epidemic, patient advocacy groups not only helped shape the way clinical trials of the disease were conducted but served as a strong force for recruiting patients into trials of investigational drugs. A broad network of trial participants helped accelerate testing of drugs in the pipeline.

In the case of pediatric cancer, a collaborative professional network was established decades ago to ensure that all patients are enrolled in clinical trials at the time of initial diagnosis. These patients then get top-quality care and generate data to help future patients.

Supported by these forces, it is not surprising that both HIV and pediatric cancer have seen remarkable advances in care over the last 30 years.

It is a false choice to think that we can either have expeditious treatment options for SARS-CoV-2 or we can have rigorous testing of them. We can have both. Achieving that goal, however, will require avoiding missteps such as widely promoting unproven products so fearful people begin using them in inconsistent ways outside of the research enterprise. Instead, we will need international coordination of scientific goals, transparency of results, comprehensive participation in clinical research, and trials that evaluate meaningful outcomes. Doing that can ensure that any treatments that are developed do, in fact, benefit the patients who receive them.

G. Caleb Alexander, M.D., is a professor of epidemiology and medicine at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Aaron S. Kesselheim, M.D., is a professor of medicine at Brigham and Womens Hospital and Harvard Medical School. Thomas J. Moore is a lecturer at George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health.

See original here:
Searching for an effective Covid-19 treatment: promise and peril - STAT

Read More...

Germline mutation of MDM4, a major p53 regulator, in a familial syndrome of defective telomere maintenance – Science Advances

Saturday, April 11th, 2020

Abstract

Dyskeratosis congenita is a cancer-prone inherited bone marrow failure syndrome caused by telomere dysfunction. A mouse model recently suggested that p53 regulates telomere metabolism, but the clinical relevance of this finding remained uncertain. Here, a germline missense mutation of MDM4, a negative regulator of p53, was found in a family with features suggestive of dyskeratosis congenita, e.g., bone marrow hypocellularity, short telomeres, tongue squamous cell carcinoma, and acute myeloid leukemia. Using a mouse model, we show that this mutation (p.T454M) leads to increased p53 activity, decreased telomere length, and bone marrow failure. Variations in p53 activity markedly altered the phenotype of Mdm4 mutant mice, suggesting an explanation for the variable expressivity of disease symptoms in the family. Our data indicate that a germline activation of the p53 pathway may cause telomere dysfunction and point to polymorphisms affecting this pathway as potential genetic modifiers of telomere biology and bone marrow function.

TP53 is the gene most frequently mutated in human tumors (1), and germ lineinactivating p53 mutations cause the Li-Fraumeni syndrome of cancer predisposition (2). In addition, accelerated tumorigenesis has been associated with polymorphisms increasing the expression of MDM2 or MDM4, the essential p53 inhibitors (3, 4). Alterations of the p53/MDM2/MDM4 regulatory node are, thus, mainly known to promote cancer. Unexpectedly, however, we recently found that mice expressing p5331, a hyperactive mutant p53 lacking its C terminus, recapitulated the complete phenotype of patients with dyskeratosis congenita (DC) (5).

DC is a telomere biology disorder characterized by the mucocutaneous triad of abnormal skin pigmentation, nail dystrophy, and oral leukoplakia; patients are also at very high risk of bone marrow failure, pulmonary fibrosis, and cancer, especially head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (6). Patients with DC are known to exhibit disease diversity in terms of age of onset, symptoms, and severity due to the mode of inheritance and causative gene (7, 8). DC is caused by germline mutations in genes encoding key components of telomere biology: the telomerase holoenzyme (DKC1, TERC, TERT, NOP10, and NHP2), the shelterin telomere protection complex (ACD, TINF2, and POT1), telomere capping proteins (CTC1 and STN1), and other proteins interacting with these cellular processes (RTEL1, NAF1, WRAP53, and PARN) (6). Twenty to 30% of affected individuals remain unexplained at the molecular level.

Our finding that p5331/31 mice were remarkable models of DC was initially unexpected for two reasons. First, an increased p53 activity was not expected to cause telomere dysfunction, given the well-accepted notion that p53 acts as the guardian of the genome. However, p53 is now known to down-regulate the expression of many genes involved in genome maintenance (5, 9, 10), and this might actually contribute to its toolkit to prevent tumor formation (11). Second, telomere biology diseases are usually difficult to model in mice because of differences in telomere length and telomerase expression between mice and humans. Mice that lack telomerase exhibited short telomeres only after three or four generations (G3/G4) of intracrosses (12, 13). However, mice with a telomerase haploinsufficiency and a deficient shelterin complex exhibited telomere dysfunction and DC features in a single generation (G1) (14). Because DC features were observed in G1 p5331/31 mice, we supposed that p53 might exert pleiotropic effects on telomere maintenance. Consistent with this, we found that murine p53 down-regulates several genes implicated in telomere biology (5, 9). Because some of these genes were also down-regulated by p53 in human cells (5, 9), our data suggested that an activating p53 mutation might cause features of DC in humans. However, this conclusion remained speculative in the absence of any clinical evidence.

Here, we report the identification of a germline missense mutation in MDM4, encoding an essential and specific negative regulator of p53, in a family presenting some DC-like phenotypic traits. We used a mouse model to demonstrate that this mutation leads to p53 activation, short telomeres, and bone marrow failure. Together, our results provide compelling evidence that a germline mutation affecting a specific p53 regulator may cause DC-like features in both humans and mice.

Family NCI-226 first enrolled in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) inherited bone marrow failure syndrome (IBMFS) cohort in 2008 (Fig. 1A and table S1). At the time, the proband (226-1) was 17 years of age and had a history of neutropenia, bone marrow hypocellularity, vague gastrointestinal symptoms, and chronic pain. His mother (226-4) also had intermittent neutropenia and a hypocellular bone marrow. Notably, his maternal aunt (226-7) had a history of melanoma and died at age 52 because of AML. The maternal aunts daughter (probands cousin, 226-8) had HNSCC at age 27 years, intermittent neutropenia, and bone marrow hypocellularity, while her son (probands cousin, 226-9) was diagnosed with metastatic HNSCC at 42 years of age. The probands father (226-3) was healthy with the exception of hemochromatosis. An IBMFS was suspected on the basis of the family history of cancer and neutropenia. Chromosome breakage for Fanconi anemia was normal, while lymphocyte telomeres were between the 1st and 10th percentiles in the proband and maternal cousin (226-8) (Fig. 1, B and C). The proband was tested for mutations in known DC-causing genes, and a TERT variant (p.W203S) was identified. Unexpectedly, however, the variant was found to be inherited from his father. TERT p.W203S is not present in gnomAD, but it is predicted to be tolerated by MetaSVM (15).

(A) Pedigree of family NCI-226. Arrow indicates proband. Cancer histories include oral squamous cell carcinoma for 226-8 at age 27 years and for 226-9 at age 42 years, and melanoma at 51 years and AML at 52 years for 226-7 (see table S1 for further details). 226-5 had lung cancer at age 69 years. 226-6 had non-Hodgkin lymphoma at age 91 years. In addition, four siblings of 226-6 had cancer: one with breast, two with lung, and one with ovary or uterus (not specified). Sequencing of 226-5, 226-6, 226-7, and 226-9 was not possible because of lack of available DNA. (B and C) Lymphocyte telomere lengths (TL) of study participants. Total lymphocyte telomere lengths are shown and were measured by flow cytometry with in situ hybridization. (B) Graphical depiction of telomere length in relation to age. Four individuals had telomeres measured twice. Legend is in (C). Percentiles (%ile) are based on 400 healthy individuals (50). (C) Age at measurement(s) and telomere length in kilobases. (D) Sequence of the MDM4 RING domain (residues 436 to 490) with secondary structure residues indicated (black boxes). The P-loop motif is highlighted in gray, and the mutated residue in red. (E) The mutant RING domain retains ATP-binding capacity. Wild-type (WT) and mutant (TM) glutathione S-transferase (GST)RING proteins, or GST alone, were incubated with 10 nM ATP and 5 Ci ATP-32P for 10 min at room temperature, filtered through nitrocellulose, and counted by liquid scintillation CPM, counts per minute. Results from two independent experiments. (F) The mutant MDM4 RING domain has an altered capacity to dimerize with the MDM2 RING. Two-hybrid assays were carried out as described (47). -LW, minus leucine and tryptophan; -LWHA, minus leucine, tryptophan, histidine and adenine; OD, optical density. Growth on the -LWHA medium indicates protein interaction, readily observed between MDM2 (M2-BD) and WT MDM4 (M4-AD WT) but faintly visible between MDM2 and MDM4T454M (M4-AD TM). (G) Impact of the mutation in transfected human cells. U2OS cells were transfected with an empty vector (EV) or an expression plasmid encoding a Myc-tagged MDM4 (WT or T454M) protein and then treated or not with cycloheximide (CHX) to inhibit protein synthesis, and protein extracts were immunoblotted with antibodies against Myc, p21, or actin. Bands were normalized to actin, and a value of 1 was assigned to cells transfected with the WT MDM4 expression plasmid (for Myc) or with the empty vector (for p21).

Since the TERT variant did not track with disease inheritance, whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed to search for a causal gene. The whole-exome data were filtered by maternal autosomal inheritance and revealed three genes with heterozygous missense mutations potentially deleterious according to bioinformatics predictions: MDM4, KRT76, and REM1 (table S2). Given the limited knowledge of the function of KRT76 and REM1, and our prior knowledge of a DC-like phenotype in p5331/31 mice, we chose to focus on the mutation affecting MDM4 because it encodes a major negative regulator of p53. Although the T454M mutation does not affect the p53 interaction domain of MDM4, it might affect p53 regulation because it affects the MDM4 RING domain: Residue 454 is both part of a P-loop motif thought to confer adenosine triphosphate (ATP)binding capacity (16) and part of a strand important for MDM2-MDM4 heterodimerization (Fig. 1D) (17). The mutant RING domain had fully retained its capacity to bind ATP specifically (Fig. 1E and fig. S1A) but exhibited an altered capacity to interact with the MDM2 RING domain in a yeast two-hybrid assay (Fig. 1F). We next used transfection experiments to evaluate the consequences of this mutation on the full-length protein in human cells. We transfected U2OS cellsknown to have a functional but attenuated p53 pathway due to MDM2 overexpression (18)with either an empty vector or an expression plasmid encoding a Myc-tagged MDM4WT or MDM4T454M protein. Compared with cells transfected with the empty vector, cells transfected with a MDM4WT or a MDM4T454M expression plasmid exhibited decreased p21 levels, indicating MDM4-mediated p53 inhibition in both cases (Fig. 1G). However, the decrease in p21 levels was less pronounced in cells expressing MDM4T454M than in cells expressing MDM4WT (Fig. 1G) despite similar transfection efficiencies (fig. S1B). The lower expression levels of the MDM4T454M protein likely contributed to its decreased capacity to inhibit p53 (Fig. 1G). In this experimental setting, the treatment with cycloheximide did not reveal any significant difference in stability between the mutant and wild-type (WT) MDM4 proteins (Fig. 1G and quantification in fig. S1C), raising the possibility that the observed lower MDM4T454M protein levels might result from differences in mRNA translation efficiency. Together, these preliminary results argued for an impact of the mutation on MDM4 function, leading to p53 activation.

The MDM4 RING domain is remarkably conserved throughout evolution, e.g., with 91% identity between the RING domains of human MDM4 and mouse Mdm4 (19). Thus, we decided to create a mouse model to precisely evaluate the physiological impact of the human mutation. We used homologous recombination in embryonic stem (ES) cells to target the p.T454M mutation at the Mdm4 locus (Fig. 2A). Targeted recombinants were identified by long-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Fig. 2B), confirmed by DNA sequencing (Fig. 2C), and the structure of the recombinant allele was further analyzed by Southern blots with probes located 5 and 3 of the targeted mutation (Fig. 2D). Recombinant ES clones were then microinjected into blastocysts to generate chimeric mice, and chimeras were mated with PGK-Cre mice to excise the Neo gene. PCR was used to verify transmission through the germ line of the Mdm4T454M (noted below Mdm4TM) mutation and to genotype the mouse colony and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (Fig. 2E). We first isolated RNAs from Mdm4TM/TM MEFs and sequenced the entire Mdm4 coding sequence: The Mdm4TM sequence was identical to the WT Mdm4 sequence except for the introduced missense mutation (not shown). Furthermore, like its human counterpart, the Mdm4 gene encodes two major transcripts: Mdm4-FL, encoding the full-length oncoprotein that inhibits p53, and Mdm4-S, encoding a shorter, extremely unstable protein (20, 21). We observed, in unstressed cells as well as in cells treated with Nutlin [a molecule that activates p53 by preventing Mdm2-p53 interactions (22) without altering Mdm4-p53 interactions (23, 24)], that the Mdm4TM mutation affected neither Mdm4-FL nor Mdm4-S mRNA levels (Fig. 2F). In Western blots, however, Mdm4-FL was the only detectable isoform, and it was expressed at lower levels in the mutant MEFs (Fig. 2G).

(A) Targeting strategy. Homologous recombination in ES cells was used to target the T454M mutation at the Mdm4 locus. For the Mdm4 WT allele, exons 9 to 11 are shown [black boxes, coding sequences; white box, 3 untranslated region (3UTR)] and Bam HI (BH) restriction sites. Above, the targeting construct contains the following: (i) a 2.9-kb-long 5 homology region encompassing exon 10, intron 10, and exon 11 sequences upstream the mutation; (ii) the mutation (asterisk) within exon 11; (iii) a 2.6-kb-long fragment encompassing the 3 end of the gene and sequences immediately downstream; (iv) a neomycin selection gene (Neo) flanked by loxP sequences (gray arrowheads) and an additional BH site; (v) a 2.1-kb-long 3 homology region containing sequences downstream Mdm4; and (vi) the Diphtheria toxin a gene (DTA) for targeting enrichment. (B to D) screening of G418-resistant ES clones as described in (A), with asterisks (*) indicating positive recombinants: (B) PCR with primers a and b; (C) sequencing after PCR with primers c and d: the sequence for codons 452 to 456 demonstrates heterozygosity at codon 454; (D) Southern blot of Bam HIdigested DNA with the 5 (left) or 3 (right) probe. (E) Examples of fibroblast genotyping by PCR with primers e and f. (F) The Mdm4T454M mutation does not alter Mdm4 mRNA levels. Mdm4-FL (left) and Mdm4-S (right) mRNAs were extracted from WT and Mdm4TM/TM MEFs before or after treatment for 24 hours with 10 M Nutlin, quantified using real-time PCR, and normalized to control mRNAs, and then the value in Nutlin-treated WT MEFs was assigned a value of 1. Results from five independent experiments and >4 MEFs per genotype. ns, not significant in a Students t test. (G) Decreased Mdm4 protein levels in Mdm4TM/TM MEFs. Protein extracts, prepared from MEFs treated as in (F), were immunoblotted with antibodies against Mdm4 or actin. Bands were normalized to actin, and then the values in Nutlin-treated WT cells were assigned a value of 1. p53P/P Mdm4E6/E6 MEFs do not express a full-length Mdm4 protein (20): They were loaded to unambiguously identify the Mdm4(-FL) band in the other lanes.

Mdm4TM/TM MEFs contained higher mRNA levels for the p53 targets p21(Cdkn1a) and Mdm2, indicating increased p53 activity (Fig. 3A). Consistent with this, Mdm4TM/TM MEFs exhibited increased p21 and Mdm2 protein levels (Fig. 3B and fig. S2). Moreover, Mdm4TM/TM MEFs prematurely ceased to proliferate when submitted to a 3T3 protocol (Fig. 3C), which also suggests an increased p53 activity. The mean telomere length was decreased by 11% in Mdm4TM/TM MEFs, and a subset of very short telomeres was observed in these cells, hence demonstrating a direct link between the Mdm4TM mutation, p53 activation, and altered telomere biology (Fig. 3D). In p5331/31 MEFs, subtle but significant decreases in expression were previously observed for several genes involved in telomere biology, and in particular, small variations in Rtel1 gene expression were found to have marked effects on the survival of p5331/31 mice (5, 9). Similarly, Mdm4TM/TM MEFs exhibited subtle but significant decreases in expression for Rtel1 and several other genes contributing to telomere biology (Fig. 3E). We previously showed that p53 activation correlates with an increased binding of the E2F4 repressor at the Rtel1 promoter (9). Hence, the decreased Rtel1 mRNA levels in Mdm4TM/TM MEFs most likely resulted from increased p53 signaling. Consistent with this, a further increase in p53 activity, induced by Nutlin, led to further decreases in Rtel1 mRNA and protein levels, in both WT and Mdm4TM/TM cells (fig. S3A). Recently, in apparent contradiction with our finding that p53 activation can cause telomere shortening (5), p53 was proposed to prevent telomere DNA degradation by inducing subtelomeric transcripts, including telomere repeat-containing RNA (TERRA) (25, 26), which suggested a complex, possibly context-dependent impact of p53 on telomeres (27). This led us to compare TERRA transcripts in WT and Mdm4TM/TM cells. Consistent with an earlier report (26), p53 activation led to increased TERRA at the mouse Xq subtelomeric region in WT cells (fig. S3B). However, Mdm4TM/TM cells failed to induce TERRA in response to stress (fig. S3B). Together, our data suggest that the telomere shortening observed in Mdm4TM/TM cells results from a p53-dependent decrease in expression of several telomere-related genes and, notably, Rtel1, a gene mutated in several families with DC (6). In addition, although evidence that altered TERRA levels can cause DC is currently lacking, we cannot exclude that an altered regulation of TERRA expression might contribute to telomere defects in Mdm4TM/TM cells.

(A) Quantification of p21 and Mdm2 mRNAs extracted from WT, Mdm4+/TM, and Mdm4TM/TM MEFs, treated or not for 24 hours with 10 M Nutlin. mRNA levels were quantified using real-time PCR and normalized to control mRNAs, and then the value in Nutlin-treated WT MEFs was assigned a value of 1. Results from 10 independent experiments. (B) Protein extracts, prepared from p53/, WT, and Mdm4TM/TM MEFs treated as in (A), were immunoblotted with antibodies against Mdm2, Mdm4, p53, p21, or actin. Bands were normalized to actin, and then the values in Nutlin-treated WT MEFs were assigned a value of 1. (C) Proliferation of MEFs in a 3T3 protocol. Each point is the average value of three independent MEFs. (D) Decreased telomere length in Mdm4TM/TM MEFs, as measured by quantitative FISH with a telomeric probe. Results from two MEFs per genotype, and 68 to 75 metaphases per MEF [means + 95% confidence interval (CI) are shown in yellow]. a.u., arbitrary units. (E) Telomere-related genes down-regulated in Mdm4TM/TM MEFs. mRNAs were extracted from unstressed WT and Mdm4TM//TM MEFs, quantified using real-time PCR, and normalized to control mRNAs, and the value in WT MEFs was assigned a value of 1. Results from >3 independent experiments and two MEFs per genotype. In relevant panels: P = 0.08, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001 by Students t (A, C at passage 7, and E) or Mann-Whitney (D) statistical tests.

Mdm4TM/TM mice were born in Mendelian proportions from Mdm4+/TM intercrosses (Fig. 4A) but were smaller than their littermates and died within 0 to 30 min after birth, with signs of severe respiratory distress (Fig. 4, B and C). Consistent with this, Mdm4TM/TM pups at postnatal day 0 (P0) appeared hypoxic (Fig. 4C), and their lungs were very small and dysfunctional (Fig. 4D). Thus, Mdm4TM/TM pups most likely died from neonatal respiratory failure. Tissues from Mdm4TM/TM pups exhibited increased p21 mRNA levels, suggesting an increase in p53 activity in these animals (fig. S4). We next used flowFISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) with a telomere-specific probe to evaluate the impact of the mutation on telomere length in vivo. Lung cells from Mdm4TM/TM pups (and control G3 Terc/ mice) exhibited a 25% decrease in mean telomere length compared with cells from WT or Mdm4+/TM littermates, indicating altered telomere biology in G1 homozygous mutants (Fig. 4E). Notably, p53 loss or haploinsufficiency rescued the perinatal lethality of Mdm4TM/TM pups, illustrating that the premature death of Mdm4TM/TM mice likely resulted from increased p53 activity (Fig. 4F). However, p53/ and Mdm4TM/TM p53/ mice exhibited similar survival curves, with a fraction of the mice (respectively 4 of 12 and 1 of 6) succumbing to thymic lymphoma in less than 180 days. In contrast, after 180 days, all the p53+/ mice remained alive, whereas most Mdm4TM/TM p53+/ mice had died. Mdm4TM/TM p53+/ mice were smaller than their littermates (Fig. 4G) and exhibited hyperpigmentation of the footpads (Fig. 4H), and 120-day-old Mdm4TM/TM p53+/ mice exhibited abnormal hemograms (Fig. 4I). Furthermore, the Mdm4TM/TM p53+/ mice that died 60 to 160 days after birth exhibited bone marrow hypocellularity (Fig. 4J), indicating bone marrow failure as the likely cause for their premature death.

(A) Mendelian distribution of the offspring from 8 Mdm4+/TM intercrosses. (B) Mdm4TM/TM mice die at birth. Cohort sizes are in parentheses. (C) Mdm4TM/TM neonates are smaller than their littermates and appear hypoxic. (D) Lungs from Mdm4TM/TM P0 pups are hypoplastic and sink in phosphate-buffered saline owing to a lack of air inflation. (E) Flow-FISH analysis of P0 lung cells with a telomere-specific peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe. Top: Representative results from a WT, a Mdm4+/TM, a Mdm4TM/TM, and a G3 Terc/ mouse are shown. Right: Green fluorescence (fluo.) with black histograms for cells without the probe (measuring cellular autofluorescence) and green histograms for cells with the probe. The shift in fluorescence intensity is smaller in Mdm4TM/TM and Terc/ cells (c or d < a or b), indicating reduced telomere length. Left: Propidium iodide (PI) fluorescence histograms are superposed for cells with or without the probe. Below: Statistical analysis of green fluorescence shifts (see Materials and Methods). Means + 95% CI are shown; data are from two to three mice and >3800 cells per genotype. (F) Impact of decreased p53 activity on Mdm4TM/TM animals. Cohort sizes are in parentheses. (G) Examples of littermates with indicated genotypes. (H) Hind legs of mice with indicated genotypes. (I) Mdm4TM/TM p53+/ mice exhibit abnormal hemograms. Counts for white blood cells (WBC), red blood cells (RBC), and platelets (PLT) for age-matched (120 days old) animals are shown. (J) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of sternum sections from WT and Mdm4TM/TM p53+/ mice. In relevant panels: ns, not significant; *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001 by Mantel-Cox (B and F), Students t (C, D, G, and I), or Mann-Whitney (E) statistical tests. Photo credits: E.T. and R.D., Institut Curie (C, G, and H); R.D., Institut Curie (D).

Although Mdm4TM/TM MEFs and mice were useful to demonstrate that the Mdm4T454M mutation leads to p53 activation and short telomeres, a detailed analysis of Mdm4+/TM mice appeared more relevant to model the NCI-226 family, in which all affected relatives were heterozygous carriers of the MDM4T454M mutation. Unlike Mdm4TM/TM mice, most Mdm4+/TM animals remained alive 6 months after birth and had no apparent phenotype, similarly to WT mice (Fig. 5A). This was consistent with our analyses in fibroblasts because Mdm4+/TM MEFs behaved like WT cells in a 3T3 proliferation assay (Fig. 3C). However, p53 target genes appeared to be transactivated slightly more efficiently in Mdm4+/TM than in WT cells (Fig. 3A), and 30% of Mdm4+/TM mice exhibited a slight hyperpigmentation of the footpads, suggesting a subtle increase in p53 activity (Fig. 5B). We reasoned that a further, subtle increase in p53 activity might affect the survival of Mdm4+/TM mice. We tested this hypothesis by mating Mdm4+/TM animals with p53+/31 mice. p53+/31 mice were previously found to exhibit a slight increase in p53 activity and to remain alive for over a year (5). Notably, unlike Mdm4+/TM or p53+/31 heterozygous mice, Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 compound heterozygotes died in less than 3 months (Fig. 5A) and exhibited many features associated with strong p53 activation. Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 mice exhibited intense skin hyperpigmentation (Fig. 5C), were much smaller than their littermates (Fig. 5D), and exhibited heart hypertrophy (Fig. 5E) and thymic hypoplasia (Fig. 5F) and the males had testicular hypoplasia (Fig. 5G). Bone marrow failure was the likely cause for the premature death of Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 mice, as indicated by abnormal hemograms of 18-day-old (P18) compound heterozygotes (Fig. 5H) and bone marrow hypocellularity in the sternum sections of moribund Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 animals (Fig. 5I). We next used flow-FISH to analyze telomere length in the bone marrow cells of P18 WT, Mdm4+/TM, p53+/31, and Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 mice. We found no significant difference between telomere lengths in cells from five WT and three Mdm4+/TM mice with normal skin pigmentation, whereas cells from two Mdm4+/TM mice with increased skin pigmentation (or from p53+/31 mice) exhibited marginal (5 to 7%) decreases in mean telomere length. Notably, in G1 Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 cells, the average telomere length was decreased by 34% (Fig. 5J). Together, these results demonstrate that Mdm4+/TM mice are hypersensitive to subtle increases in p53 activity. Consistent with this, Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 MEFs also exhibited increased p53 signaling and accelerated proliferation arrest in a 3T3 protocol (fig. S5). In sum, the comparison between Mdm4TM/TM and Mdm4TM/TM p53+/ mice, or between Mdm4+/TM and Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 animals, indicated that subtle variations in p53 signaling had marked effects on the phenotypic consequences of the Mdm4T454M mutation (table S3).

(A) Impact of increased p53 activity on Mdm4+/TM animals. Cohort sizes are in parentheses. (B) Footpads from Mdm4+/TM mice appear normal (top) or exhibit a subtle increase in pigmentation (bottom). (C) Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 mice exhibit strong skin hyperpigmentation. (D) Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 mice are smaller than age-matched WT mice. (E to G) Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 mice exhibit heart hypertrophy (E) as well as thymic (F) and testicular (G) hypoplasia. (H) Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 mice exhibit abnormal hemograms. Counts for white blood cells, red blood cells, and platelets for five age-matched (P18) animals per genotype are shown. (I) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of sternum sections from mice of the indicated genotypes. (J) Flow-FISH analysis of P18 bone marrow cells with a telomere-specific PNA probe. Top: Representative results for a WT, a Mdm4+/TM with normal skin pigmentation (nsp), a Mdm4+/TM with increased footpad skin pigmentation (isp), a p53+/31, and a Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 mouse are shown; black histograms, cells without the probe; green histograms, cells with the probe. The smallest shift in fluorescence intensity (e) was observed with Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 cells. Bottom: Statistical analysis of green fluorescence shifts. Means + 95% CI are shown; data are from >1500 cells per genotype. In relevant panels: ns, not significant; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001 by Mantel-Cox (A), Students t (D and E to H), or Mann-Whitney (J) statistical tests. Photo credits: R.D. and P.L., Institut Curie (B); E.T. and R.D., Institut Curie (C and D).

The carriers of the MDM4T454M mutation exhibited considerable heterogeneity in their phenotypes (Fig. 1 and table S1). The data from our mouse model suggested that variations in p53 activity might account for the variable expressivity and penetrance of clinical features among the NCI-226 MDM4+/T454M relatives. Hence, we analyzed nine known common polymorphisms reported to affect p53 activity and tumorigenesis (four at the TP53 locus, two at the MDM2 locus, and three at the MDM4 locus) (3,4,2832). Among the four MDM4+/T454M relatives, the proband (NCI-226-1) is more difficult to interpret because the potential contribution of the TERT p.W203S variant to his phenotype cannot be ruled out (even though it appears unlikely according to in silico predictions). The MDM4 allele encoding the mutant protein (p.T454M) appears associated with the C allele of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs4245739, the G allele of SNP rs11801299, and the G allele of SNP rs1380576 (Fig. 6A). These three MDM4 variant alleles are associated with increased p53 activity (4,32) and might, thus, synergize with the MDM4T454M mutation in this family.

(A) Genotyping of polymorphisms that may affect the p53 pathway. The SNPs rs1800371 and rs1042522 modify the p53 protein sequence (28,29), whereas rs17878362 and rs17880560 are singlets (A1) or doublets (A2) of G-rich sequences in noncoding regions of TP53 that affect p53 expression (30). SNPs rs117039649 and rs2279744, in the MDM2 promoter, affect MDM2 mRNA levels (3,31). Three SNPs are at the MDM4 locus: rs4245739 in the 3UTR region affects MDM4 protein levels (4), whereas rs11801299 and rs1380576 were associated with an increased risk of developing retinoblastoma (32), a cancer type with frequent MDM4 alterations (51). Polymorphisms that differ among family members are in bold, with the allele (or haplotype) associated with increased p53 activity in green (because it may synergize with the effects of the MDM4T454M mutation). Alleles (or haplotypes) for which there is evidence of decreased p53 activity, or for which the effect is uncertain, are highlighted in red or blue, respectively. Please note that the clinical effects of the TP53 rs1042522 SNP have recently been contested (33), so that all alleles for this SNP were labeled in blue. MAF, minor allele frequency reported for all gnomAD populations combined. https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org (52). (B) Comparative analysis of primary fibroblasts from family members 226-4 and 226-8. p21 and RTEL1 mRNAs, extracted from cells from relatives NCI 226-4 and NCI 226-8 or two unrelated patients with DC carrying a TINF2 or a TERT mutation, were quantified using real-time PCR, normalized to control mRNAs, and then expressed relative to the mean values in TINF2 and TERT mutant cells. ns, not significant, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 in a Students t test.

The probands affected cousin (226-8) exhibited a very early onset of disease, with lymphocyte telomere length within or below the first percentile of age-matched control participants and tongue squamous cell carcinoma at age 27 (Fig. 1 and table S1). The WT MDM4 allele of 226-8 carried the rs4245739 C, the rs11801299 G, and the rs1380576 G variants associated with increased p53 activity. This suggests a potential disease-modifying effect of these MDM4 SNPs. In contrast, the probands mother (226-4) was much less severely affected, with telomere length between the 10th and 50th percentiles (Fig. 1). Although we cannot rule out that disease anticipation might contribute to her milder phenotype, note that her WT MDM4 allele carried variants that might correlate with decreased p53 activity and could antagonize the MDM4T454M mutation (rs4245739 A, rs11801299 A, and rs1380576 C; Fig. 6A). Family members 226-4 and 226-8 shared the same genotypes for all the other tested variants, except for TP53 rs1042522, a SNP first reported to affect apoptotic or cell cycle arrest responses (28), but with a clinical effect that now appears controversial (33). The probands sister (226-2), with a B cell deficiency and telomere lengths around the 10th percentile, also appeared less affected than 226-8. All the tested variants at the MDM2 and MDM4 loci were identical between 226-2 and 226-8. However, unlike 226-8, 226-2 exhibited a TP53 allele with an A1A1 haplotype for variants rs17878362 and rs17880560 that might decrease p53 activity (30) and antagonize the effects of the MDM4T454M mutation (Fig. 6A).

We had primary fibroblasts available for two of these family members, 226-4 and 226-8, allowing us to directly assess the functional effect of the MDM4T454M variant in these cells. These fibroblasts were grown in parallel with primary fibroblasts from patients with DC carrying either a TINF2K280E mutation or a TERTP704S mutation, and mRNA levels for p21 and RTEL1 were quantified. In agreement with the notion that a MDM4T454M heterozygous mutation activates p53 signaling in NCI-226 family members, fibroblasts from both 226-4 and 226-8 exhibited increased p21 mRNA levels compared with TINF2 or TERT mutant cells (Fig. 6B). However, cells from 226-4 only exhibited a 2-fold increase in p21 levels, whereas a 12-fold increase was observed for cells from 226-8, consistent with the notion that SNPs affecting the p53 pathway might counteract (for 226-4) or strengthen (for 226-8) the effect of the MDM4T454M mutation. Furthermore, we previously showed that RTEL1 mRNA levels are down-regulated upon p53 activation in human cells (5). RTEL1 mRNA levels appeared normal in cells from 226-4 but were markedly decreased in cells from 226-8, raising the possibility that a threshold in p53 activation might be required to affect RTEL1 expression (Fig. 6B).

Although MDM4 is primarily known for its clinical relevance in cancer biology, our study shows that a germline missense MDM4 mutation may cause features suggestive of DC. In humans, the MDM4 (p.T454M) mutation was identified in this family with neutropenia, bone marrow hypocellularity, early-onset tongue SCC, AML, and telomeres between the 1st and 10th percentiles in the younger generation. In mice, the same Mdm4 mutation notably correlated with increased p53 activity, short telomeres, and bone marrow failure. In both human transfected cells and MEFs, the mutant protein was expressed at lower levels than its WT counterpart, likely contributing to increased p53 activity. Together, these results demonstrate the importance of the MDM4/p53 regulatory axis on telomere biology and DC-like features in both species. Notably, p5331/31 mice were previously found to phenocopy DC (5), but whether this finding was relevant to human disease had remained controversial. When a mutation in PARN was found to cause DC (34), it first appeared consistent with the p5331 mouse model because PARN, the polyadenylate-specific ribonuclease, had been proposed to regulate p53 mRNA stability (35). However, whether PARN regulates the stability of mRNAs is now contested (36). Rather, PARN would regulate the levels of over 200 microRNAs, of which only a few might repress p53 mRNA translation (37). Furthermore, PARN regulates TERC, the telomerase RNA component (38), and TERC overexpression increased telomere length in PARN-deficient cells (39). Thus, whether a germline mutation that specifically activates p53 can cause DC-like features remained to be demonstrated in humans, and our report provides compelling evidence for this, because unlike PARN, MDM4 is a very specific regulator of p53.

A germline antiterminating MDM2 mutation was recently identified in a patient with a Werner-like syndrome of premature aging. Although multiple mechanisms might contribute to the clinical features in that report, a premature cellular senescence resulting from p53 hyperactivation was proposed to play a major role in his segmental progeroid phenotype (40). In that regard, our finding that increased p53 activity correlates with short telomeres appears relevant because telomere attrition is a primary hallmark of aging, well known to trigger cellular senescence (41). Furthermore, germline TP53 frameshift mutations were recently reported in two patients diagnosed with pure red blood cell aplasia and hypogammaglobulinemia, resembling but not entirely consistent with Diamond Blackfan anemia (DBA) (42). In addition to the pure red cell aplasia diagnostic of DBA, those patients were found to exhibit relatively short telomeres (although not as short as telomeres from patients with DC), which may also seem consistent with our results. Our finding of an MDM4 missense mutation in a DC-like family, together with recent reports linking an antiterminating MDM2 mutation to a Werner-like phenotype and TP53 frameshift mutations to DBA-like features, indicates that the clinical impact of germline mutations affecting the p53/MDM2/MDM4 regulatory network is just emerging. An inherited hyperactivation of the p53 pathwayvia a germline TP53, MDM2, or MDM4 mutationmay thus cause either DBA, Werner-like, or DC-like features, but additional work will be required to determine whether mutations in any of these three genes can cause any of these three syndromes. Likewise, several mouse models have implicated p53 deregulation in features of other developmental syndromes including the CHARGE, Treacher-Collins, Waardenburg, or DiGeorge syndrome (43), and it will be important to know whether germline mutations in TP53, MDM2, or MDM4 may cause these additional syndromes in humans.

Heterozygous Mdm4+/TM mice appeared normal but were hypersensitive to variations in p53 activity, and, perhaps most notably, Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 compound heterozygous mice rapidly died from bone marrow failure. Thus, the p5331 mutation acted as a strong genetic modifier of the Mdm4TM mutation. It is tempting to speculate that similarly, among the NCI-226 family members heterozygous for the MDM4T454M allele, differences in the severity of phenotypic traits (e.g., lymphocyte telomere length and bone marrow cellularity) may result, in part, from modifiers affecting the p53 pathway and synergize or antagonize with the effects of the MDM4T454M mutation. To search for potentially relevant modifiers, we looked at nine polymorphisms at the TP53, MDM2, and MDM4 loci that were previously reported to affect p53 activity. Notably, we found that the family member most severely affected (226-8, the probands cousin) carried a TP53 haplotype, as well as SNPs on the WT MDM4 allele, that might synergize with the effects of the MDM4T454M mutation. Conversely, a TP53 haplotype for the probands sister (226-2), or SNPs at the WT MDM4 locus for the probands mother (226-4), might antagonize the impact of MDM4T454M allele. Consistent with this, primary fibroblasts from 226-4 and 226-8 exhibited increased p53 activity, but p53 activation was much stronger in cells from 226-8. Our data, thus, appear consistent with the existence of genetic modifiers at the TP53 and MDM4 loci that may affect DC-like phenotypic traits among family members carrying the MDM4 (p.T454M) mutation. However, this remains speculative given the small number of individuals that could be analyzed. Furthermore, nonexonic variants affecting other genes might also contribute to DC-like traits (44). Last, the TP53 and MDM4 polymorphisms considered here were previously evaluated for their potential impact on tumorigenic processes, rather than DC-like traits such as telomere length or bone marrow hypocellularity. Our data suggest that polymorphisms at the TP53 and MDM4 (and possibly MDM2) loci should be evaluated for their potential impact on bone marrow function and telomere biology.

The individuals in this study are participants in an Institutional Review Boardapproved longitudinal cohort study at the NCI entitled Etiologic Investigation of Cancer Susceptibility in Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes (www.marrowfailure.cancer.gov, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00027274) (7). Patients and their family members enrolled in 2008 and completed detailed family history and medical history questionnaires. Detailed medical record review and thorough clinical evaluations of the proband, his sister, parents, and maternal cousin were conducted at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center. Telomere length was measured by flow cytometry with in situ hybridization (flow-FISH) (45) in leukocytes of all patients and family members reported. DNA was extracted from whole blood using standard methods. DNA was not available from 226-7 or 226-9 (Fig. 1). Given the time frame of participant enrollment, Sanger sequencing of DKC1, TINF2, TERT, TERC, and WRAP53 was performed first, followed by exome sequencing.

WES of blood-derived DNA for family NCI-226 was performed at the NCIs Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory as previously described (46). Exome enrichment was performed with NimbleGens SeqCap EZ Human Exome Library v3.0 + UTR (Roche NimbleGen Inc., Madison, WI, USA), targeting 96 Mb of exonic sequence and the flanking untranslated regions (UTRs) on an Illumina HiSeq. Annotation of each exome variant locus was performed using a custom software pipeline. WES variants of interest were identified if they met the following criteria: heterozygous in the proband, his mother, and maternal cousin; nonsynonymous; had a minor allele frequency <0.1% in the Exome Aggregation Consortium databases; and occurred <5 times in our in house database of 4091 individuals. Variants of interest were validated to rule out false-positive findings using an Ion 316 chip on the Ion PGM Sequencer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Primers flanking the MDM4 RING domain were used to amplify RING sequences, and PCR products were cloned (or cloned and mutagenized) in the pGST-parallel2 plasmid. Glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins were expressed in BL21 (DE3) cells. After induction for 16 hours at 20C with 0.2 mM IPTG (isopropyl--d-thiogalactopyranoside), soluble proteins were extracted by sonication in lysis buffer [50 mM tris (pH 7.0), 300 mM LiSO4, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 0.2% NP-40, complete Protease inhibitors (Roche) 1]. The soluble protein fraction was incubated with Glutathione Sepharose beads (Pharmacia) at 4C for 2 hours, and the bound proteins were washed with 50 mM tris (pH 7.0), 300 mM LiSO4, and 1 mM DTT and then eluted with an elution buffer [50 mM tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, and 15 mM glutathione]. WT and mutant GST-RING proteins (0, 1, 2, 4, or 8 g) or GST alone (0 or 8 g) was incubated with 10 nM ATP and 5 Ci ATP-32P for 10 min at room temperature, filtered through nitrocellulose, and counted by liquid scintillation. Alternatively, 7 g of either WT or mutant GST-RING proteins was incubated with 5 Ci ATP-32P for 10 min at room temperature and increasing amounts (0, 0.02, 2, 20, and 200 M) of ATP or guanosine triphosphate (GTP), filtered through nitrocellulose, and counted by liquid scintillation.

The yeast two-hybrid assays were performed as described (47). Briefly, MDM4 and MDM2 RING open reading frames were cloned in plasmids derived from the two-hybrid vectors pGADT7 (Gal4-activating domain) and pGBKT7 (Gal4-binding domain) creating N-terminal fusions and transformed in yeast haploid strains Y187 and AH109 (Clontech). Interactions were scored, after mating and diploid selection on dropout medium without leucine and tryptophan, as growth on dropout medium without leucine, tryptophan, histidine, and adenine.

U2OS cells (106) were transfected by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) with pCDNA3.1 (6 g), or 5 106 cells were transfected with 30 g of pCDNA3.1-MycTag-MDM4WT or pCDNA3.1-MycTag-MDM4TM. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were treated with cycloheximide (50 g/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, C4859), then scratched in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) after 2, 4, or 8 hours, pelleted, and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen before protein or RNA extraction with standard protocols.

The targeting vector was generated by recombineering from the RP23-365M5 BAC (bacterial artificial chromosome) clone (CHORI BACPAC Resources) containing mouse Mdm4 and downstream sequences of C57Bl6/J origin. A loxP-flanked neomycin cassette (Neo) and a diphtheria toxin gene (DTA) were inserted downstream of the Mdm4 gene, respectively, for positive and negative selections, and a single-nucleotide mutation encoding the missense mutation T454M (TM) was targeted in the exon 11 of Mdm4. The targeting construct was fully sequenced before use.

CK-35 ES cells were electroporated with the targeting construct linearized with Not I. Recombinant clones were identified by long-range PCR, confirmed by Southern blot, PCR, and DNA sequencing (primer sequences in table S4). Two independent recombinant clones were injected into blastocysts to generate chimeras, and germline transmission was verified by genotyping their offspring. Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) of RNAs from Mdm4TM/TM MEFs showed that the mutant complementary DNA (cDNA) differed from an Mdm4 WT sequence only by the engineered missense mutation. The genotyping of p53+/, p53+/31, and G3 Terc/ mice was performed as previously described (5, 12). All experiments were performed according to Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee regulations.

MEFs isolated from 13.5-day embryos were cultured in a 5% CO2 and 3% O2 incubator, in Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium GlutaMAX (Gibco), with 15% fetal bovine serum (Biowest), 100 M 2-mercaptoethanol (Millipore), 0.01 mM Non-Essential Amino Acids, and penicillin/streptavidin (Gibco) for five or fewer passages, except for 3T3 experiments, performed in a 5% CO2 incubator for seven passages. Cells were treated for 24 hours with 10 M Nutlin 3a (Sigma-Aldrich) (22) or 15 M cisplatin (Sigma-Aldrich). Primary human fibroblasts at low passage (p.2 for TINF2K280E, p.3 for NCI-226-4 and NCI-226-8, and p.4 for TERTP704S) were thawed and cultured in fibroblast basal medium (Lonza) with 20% fetal calf serum, l-glutamin, 10 mM Hepes, penicillin/streptavidin, and gentamicin before quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis.

Total RNA, extracted using NucleoSpin RNA II (Macherey-Nagel), was reverse transcribed using SuperScript IV (Invitrogen), with, for TERRA quantification, a (CCCTAA)4 oligo as described (48). Real-time qPCRs were performed with primer sequences as described (5, 9, 48) on a QuantStudio using Power SYBR Green (Applied Biosystems).

Protein detection by immunoblotting was performed using antibodies against Mdm2 (4B2), Mdm4 (M0445; Sigma-Aldrich), p53 (AF1355, R&D Systems), actin (A2066; Sigma-Aldrich), p21 (F5; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Myc-Tag (SAB2702192; Sigma-Aldrich), and Rtel1 (from J.-A.L.-V.). Chemiluminescence revelation was achieved with SuperSignal West Dura (Perbio). Bands of interest were quantified by using ImageJ and normalized with actin.

Cells were treated with colcemide (0.5 g/ml) for 1.5 hours, submitted to hypotonic shock, fixed in an (3:1) ethanol/acetic acid solution, and dropped onto glass slides. Quantitative FISH was then carried out as described (5) with a TelC-Cy3 peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe (Panagene). Images were acquired using a Zeiss Axioplan 2, and telomeric signals were quantified with iVision (Chromaphor).

Flow-FISH with mouse cells was performed as described (45). For each animal, either the lungs were collected or the bone marrow from two tibias and two femurs was collected and red blood cells were lysed; then, 2 106 cells were fixed in 500 l of PNA hybridization buffer [70% deionized formamide, 20 mM tris (pH 7.4), and 0.1% Blocking reagent; Roche] and stored at 20C. Either nothing (control) or 5 l of probe stock solution was added to cells [probe stock solution: 10 M TelC-FAM PNA probe (Panagene), 70% formamide, and 20 mM tris (pH 7.4)], and samples were denatured for 10 min at 80C before hybridization for 2 hours at room temperature. After three washes, cells were resuspended in PBS 1, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, ribonuclease A (1000 U/ml), and propidium iodide (12.5 g/ml) and analyzed with an LSR II fluorescence-activated cell sorter. WT and G3 Terc/ mice were included in all flow-FISH experiments, respectively, as controls of normal and short telomeres. For fluorescence shift analyses, the green histograms (corresponding to cells with the telomeric probe) were sliced into 18 windows of equal width and numbered 0 to 17 according to their distance from the median value in cells without the probe, and the number of cells in each window was quantified with ImageJ. The data from two to five mice per genotype were typically used to calculate mean telomere lengths, expressed relative to the mean in WT cells.

Organs were fixed in formol 4% for 24 hours and then ethanol 70% and embedded in paraffin wax. Serial sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin using standard procedures (49). For hemograms, 100 l of blood from each animal was recovered retro-orbitally in a 10-l citrate-concentrated solution (S5770; Sigma-Aldrich) and analyzed using an MS9 machine (Melet Schloesing Laboratoires).

DNA extracted from Epstein-Barr virustransformed lymphocytes of NCI-226 family members was amplified with primers flanking nucleotide polymorphisms of interest (primer sequences in table S5), and then PCR products were analyzed by Sanger DNA sequencing.

Analyses with Students t, Mann-Whitney, or Mantel-Cox statistical tests were performed by using GraphPad Prism, and values of P < 0.05 were considered significant.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Acknowledgments: We are grateful to the family for valuable contributions to this study. We thank I. Grandjean, C. Caspersen, A. Fosse, and M. Garcia from the Animal Facility, C. Alberti and C. Roulle from the Transgenesis Platform, M. Richardson and A. Nicolas from the Pathology Service, and Z. Maciorowski from the Cell-Sorting Facility of the Institut Curie. We thank A. Chor for help with qPCRs, A. Pyanitskaya, C. Adam, V. Borde, M. Schertzer, and M. Perderiset for plasmids and technical advices, and A. Fajac for comments on the manuscript. F.T. would like to acknowledge the talent, kindness, and loyal support of I. Simeonova and S.J., two exceptional PhD students whose pioneering work led to this study. Funding: The Genetics of Tumor Suppression laboratory received funding from the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (Labellisation 2014-2018 and Comit Ile-de-France), the Fondation ARC and the Gefluc. PhD students were supported by fellowships from the Ministre de lEnseignement Suprieur et de la Recherche (to S.J., E.T., and R.D.), the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (to S.J.), and the Fondation pour la Recherche Mdicale (to E.T.). The work of S.A.S., N.G., and B.P.A. was supported by the intramural research program of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, NCI, and the NIH Clinical Center. Author contributions: V.L. created the Mdm4T454M mouse model, genotyped mouse cohorts, and performed transfections, yeast two-hybrid assays, protein purifications, and molecular cloning. E.T., R.D., and V.L. managed mouse colonies. E.T., R.D., and P.L. performed mouse anatomopathology. I.D., E.T., R.D., F.T., and J.-A.L.-V. determined mouse telomere lengths. V.L. and S.J. genotyped human polymorphisms and analyzed human fibroblasts. E.T. and R.D. genotyped MEFs and performed 3T3 assays. V.L., R.D., and E.T. performed Western blots. E.T., R.D., V.L., S.J., and P.L. performed qPCRs. B.B. and V.L. performed ATP-binding assays. B.P.A. supervised the NCI IBMFS study. N.G. and S.A.S. evaluated study participants. S.A.S. analyzed the exome sequencing data. F.T. and S.A.S. supervised the project and wrote the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors. The human samples can be provided by S.A.S. pending scientific review and a completed material transfer agreement. Requests for human cells should be submitted to S.A.S.

Follow this link:
Germline mutation of MDM4, a major p53 regulator, in a familial syndrome of defective telomere maintenance - Science Advances

Read More...

This is misinformation on steroids: The Canadian who took on Gwyneth Paltrow is debunking coronavirus myths – Toronto Star

Saturday, April 11th, 2020

EDMONTONA televangelist selling silver as a cure for COVID-19. The idea that drinking cow urine or bleach will help with symptoms. Or the suggestion that rubbing essential oils on a part of your body where the sun dont shine will protect you.

As someone who has spent decades debunking myths and bad science, whether related to climate change, stem cells or vaccinations, Timothy Caulfield has almost heard it all.

But he says hes never seen anything quite like this.

This is misinformation on steroids, said Caulfield, referring to the COVID-19 infodemic hes hoping to fight.

The University of Alberta professor and health policy expert, host of A Users Guide to Cheating Death on Netflix and author of Is Gwyneth Paltrow Wrong about Everything? is one of many researchers across the country whos received funding from the federal governments Rapid Research Funding Opportunity.

He and his team will be researching how COVID-19 misinformation spreads and how to stop it.

With the coronavirus, what were seeing is those concerns Ive been following for decades really amplified, Caulfield said. Even Ive been astounded the degree to which misinformation in this context is spread and the impact its had.

Here, its been ramped up very quickly, and on an international scale, and at the worst possible time.

YOU MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN...

Caulfield noticed this is the first pandemic of its scale to take place in the era of social media, where information moves fast and furious. And often inaccurately.

And while governments and legacy media were once the gatekeepers of important information related to public health, its much harder to control how misinformation is spread on platforms like Facebook and Twitter, Caulfield said.

Misinformation can contribute to fear, confusion and anxiety in a pandemic. But it also has literal life or death consequences.

There is actual death and physical harm when people listen to misinformation, Caulfield said. And weve seen that play out in the context of the coronavirus.

One of the chemicals touted as possibly effective for COVID-19 is hydroxychloroquine, an anti-malaria medication. In March, an Arizona man died after consuming chloroquine phosphate, a fish tank cleaner, which he thought was hydroxychloroquine.

One of the interesting aspects of this infodemic that Caulfield has observed is the continuum of misinformation. Some ideas, like drinking bleach, would seem patently absurd to most people.

But then you have this stuff thats kind of in the middle, that seems more plausible or slightly more credible, like that you can boost your immune system (against COVID-19) or that you should be taking supplements, Caulfield said.

On the positive side, there is evidence that people can typically tell when information is accurate if they simply take the time to pause and reflect something Caulfield and his team hope they can help encourage more people to do.

YOU MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN...

I hope that one of the legacies of this event is we can remember the value of good science, the value of trusted voices and also the potential harm of misinformation.

Here are seven supposed coronavirus cures debunked by misinformation expert Timothy Caulfield:

Hydroxychloroquine

The interest in this drug including by the President of the United States (sigh) is largely based on the reporting of one, small, methodologically flawed study. It has led to the hoarding and misuse of the drug. At this point, we dont have the good, clinical data, to support its use. This controversy is a good example of why it is important to report and interpret the emerging science very carefully.

Get the latest in your inbox

Never miss the latest news from the Star, including up-to-date coronavirus coverage, with our free email newsletters

Drinking bleach

This science-free and dangerous idea has been lurking around on social media for a while. It has, for example, been marketed as a cure for autism. It became part of the coronavirus early on largely because people like the conspiracy-loving followers of the far-right QAnon movement pushed it. Many of them also believe the COVID-19 is a hoax. (Still? You guys, still believe this?) While this may seem kooky and needless to say a terrible idea from a health perspective, the mere fact that we know about it shows how fringe ideas can work their way into broader public discourse.

Garlic soup

OK, this one feels more plausible. And garlic is so good! There is also some research that seems to suggest that garlic can help with flu and respiratory infections. In fact, the research remains weak and some of it is in vitro (that is, lab research that doesnt involve actual humans). Be skeptical. Indeed, this one is so popular the World Health Organization recently dealt with this specific myth, noting: There is no evidence from the current outbreak that eating garlic has protected people from the new coronavirus. Still, garlic is healthy!

Drinking silver

This bunk remedy has also been around for a while. It is a classic quack cure-all that has been peddled for every conceivable ailment. There is no evidence to support its use for anything and it may even be harmful. Recently, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and the State of Missouri took legal action against televangelist Jim Bakker for selling his Silver Solution as a cure for COVID-19.

Snorting cocaine

Lets just say, um, nope. Not a good idea. Snorting cocaine will not cure or prevent to COVID-19. Incredibly, the French government had to go so far as to tweet out a warning that No, cocaine does NOT protect against COVID-19.

Homeopathy

This is one of the most popular alternative remedies. (Homeopathy is a medical practice based on the idea that the body has the ability to heal itself and that like cures like. That is, if a substance causes a symptom in a healthy person, giving the person a very small amount of the same substance may cure the illness.) There is, however, no evidence homeopathy works or could work. It is, in fact, completely scientifically implausible. Despite this reality, the Indian government proposed the use of homeopathy, which was developed in Germany in the late 18th century, as a possible preventative strategy for the coronavirus. The proposal was widely condemned and the government was forced to do a U-turn.

Drinking cow urine

Nope.

See original here:
This is misinformation on steroids: The Canadian who took on Gwyneth Paltrow is debunking coronavirus myths - Toronto Star

Read More...

Outlook on the Worldwide Precision Medicine Industry to 2025 – Growing Focus on Biomarkers is Promising Ample Opportunities – Yahoo Finance

Friday, April 10th, 2020

Dublin, April 09, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Global Precision Medicine Market 2019-2025" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The global precision medicine market is estimated to grow at a CAGR of 9.8% during the forecast period. Factors such as the increasing prevalence of cancer, central nervous system disorder, and respiratory diseases coupled with the increasing focus on researches focusing on the development of precision medicine are augmenting the market growth. Moreover, the growing focus on the biomarkers is promising ample opportunities for the growth of the personalized medicine market across the globe.

The report analyzes the global precision medicine market on the basis of technology, application, end-use, and geography. On the basis of technology, the market is genomics, transcriptomics, and epigenomics. Based on the application, the market is classified into oncology, neurology, immunology, and others. Based on the end-user, the market is classified into pharmaceutical companies, diagnostic companies, and healthcare IT companies.

The advancement in genomic and clinical science have established advanced prospects to further customize healthcare to every patient. The Center for Individualized Medicine at Mayo Clinic is practicing personalized medicine and using it to the complete spectrum of healthcare with the use of sophisticated techniques of molecular analysis and genomic sequencing. Microbiome Program by Mayo Clinic enables to understand the cause of transmitting the infection through bacteria. It investigates several questions under the program, such as if microbial communities in the colon could be responsible for irritable bowel symptoms and gluten sensitivity. In addition, it examines the colon organisms affect other body parts, including the joints. The program explores the genetic code of the microorganism of the body. It uses advanced techniques for profiling the microbiome of an individual to detect, prevent and diagnose infections and other diseases. These rising focus of medical centers towards microbiome program for personalized medicine is expanding the scope for the growth of the global personalized medicine market.

Geographically, the market is analyzed into North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the Rest of the World. North America is estimated to contribute a significant market share in the global precision medicine industry over the forecast period. Increasing prevalence of cancer, respiratory diseases, and neurological disorders are augmenting the growth of the North America precision medicine market. Moreover, the presence of prominent institutes and market players focusing on the development of precision medicine through researches are also driving the market growth of the region.

Furthermore, the market is characterized by the presence of several players including F. Hoffmann La Roche Ltd., Abbott Laboratories Inc., Pfizer Inc., Qiagen NV, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Eagle Genomics, and many others. These players adopt various strategies to capitalize on market growth opportunities. For instance, in October 2018, Eagle Genomics partnered with Microsoft Genomics to tackle the computational challenges of the genomics era. The aim of the partnership was to introduce the scale and power of the cloud to precision medicine, across the production of fundamental research and core services.

The Report Covers:

Key Topics Covered:

1. Report Summary1.1. Research Methods and Tools1.2. Market Breakdown1.2.1. By Segments1.2.2. By Geography

2. Market Overview and Insights2.1. Scope of the Report 2.2. Analyst Insight & Current Market Trends2.2.1. Key Findings2.2.2. Recommendations2.2.3. Conclusion2.3. Rules & Regulations

3. Competitive Landscape3.1. Company Share Analysis3.2. Key Strategy Analysis3.3. Key Company Analysis3.3.1. F. Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.3.3.1.1. Overview3.3.1.2. Financial Analysis3.3.1.3. SWOT Analysis3.3.1.4. Recent Developments3.3.2. Abbott Laboratories Inc.3.3.2.1. Overview3.3.2.2. Financial Analysis3.3.2.3. SWOT Analysis3.3.2.4. Recent Developments3.3.3. Pfizer Inc.3.3.3.1. Overview3.3.3.2. Financial Analysis3.3.3.3. SWOT Analysis3.3.3.4. Recent Developments3.3.4. Qiagen NV3.3.4.1. Overview3.3.4.2. Financial Analysis3.3.4.3. SWOT Analysis3.3.4.4. Recent Developments3.3.5. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. 3.3.5.1. Overview3.3.5.2. Financial Analysis3.3.5.3. SWOT Analysis3.3.5.4. Recent Developments

4. Market Determinants4.1. Motivators4.2. Restraints4.3. Opportunities

5. Market Segmentation5.1. Global Precision Medicine Market by Technology 5.1.1. Genomics5.1.2. Transcriptomics5.1.3. Epigenomics5.2. Global Precision Medicine Market by Application5.2.1. Oncology5.2.2. Neurology 5.2.3. Immunology5.2.4. Others (Respiratory)5.3. Global Precision Medicine Market by End-Use5.3.1. Pharmaceutical Companies5.3.2. Diagnostic Companies5.3.3. Healthcare IT Companies

6. Regional Analysis6.1. North America6.1.1. United States6.1.2. Canada6.2. Europe6.2.1. UK6.2.2. Germany6.2.3. Italy6.2.4. Spain6.2.5. France6.2.6. Rest of Europe6.3. Asia-Pacific6.3.1. China6.3.2. Japan6.3.3. India6.3.4. Rest of Asia-Pacific6.4. Rest of the World

7. Company Profiles

Companies Mentioned

Story continues

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/kdkbgk

Research and Markets also offers Custom Research services providing focused, comprehensive and tailored research.

CONTACT: ResearchAndMarkets.comLaura Wood, Senior Press Managerpress@researchandmarkets.comFor E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

Originally posted here:
Outlook on the Worldwide Precision Medicine Industry to 2025 - Growing Focus on Biomarkers is Promising Ample Opportunities - Yahoo Finance

Read More...

Myriad Withdrawing Financial Guidance for FY2020 Due to Business Impact from Coronavirus Pandemic – Yahoo Finance

Friday, April 10th, 2020

SALT LAKE CITY, April 08, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Myriad Genetics, Inc. (MYGN), a global leader in personalized medicine, announced today that due to the impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic, the company is withdrawing its fiscal year 2020 financial guidance.

Prior to mid-March we were experiencing volume trends consistent with our expectations across all products; however, recent social distancing guidelines have had a significant impact on test volume trends in late March and into the fiscal fourth-quarter, said R. Bryan Riggsbee, interim president and CEO and chief financial officer at Myriad Genetics. Our priority as an organization during the coronavirus pandemic has been to maintain business continuity and access to testing, while ensuring the safety of our employees and customers. As an organization we have taken steps to advance these dual aims, and I am very proud of how the Myriad team has responded to the crisis.

In responding to the pandemic, Myriad has made several changes to its business practices to promote the safety of both customers and employees including ceasing in-office sales calls and implementing virtual selling, granting all non-essential personnel the ability to work from home, enabling direct sample collection for patients and implementing policies to improve laboratory personnel safety.

While the uncertain timeframe of the Coronavirus pandemic makes it difficult to predict future business trends for the company, the company will provide an update on its business, including the impact of COVID-19, on its next quarterly earnings call.

About Myriad GeneticsMyriad Genetics, Inc. is a leading personalized medicine company dedicated to being a trusted advisor transforming patient lives worldwide with pioneering molecular diagnostics. Myriad discovers and commercializes molecular diagnostic tests that determine the risk of developing disease, accurately diagnose disease, assess the risk of disease progression, and guide treatment decisions across six major medical specialties where molecular diagnostics can significantly improve patient care and lower healthcare costs. Myriad is focused on three strategic imperatives: transitioning and expanding its hereditary cancer testing markets, diversifying its product portfolio through the introduction of new products and increasing the revenue contribution from international markets. For more information on how Myriad is making a difference, please visit the Company's website: http://www.myriad.com.

Myriad, the Myriad logo, BART, BRACAnalysis, Colaris, Colaris AP, myPath, myRisk, Myriad myRisk, myRisk Hereditary Cancer, myChoice, myPlan, BRACAnalysis CDx, Tumor BRACAnalysis CDx, myChoice HRD, Vectra, Prequel, ForeSight, GeneSight and Prolaris are trademarks or registered trademarks of Myriad Genetics, Inc. or its wholly owned subsidiaries in the United States and foreign countries. MYGN-F, MYGN-G.

Safe Harbor StatementThis press release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements relating to maintaining the Companys global leadership in precision medicine and the Company's strategic directives under the caption "About Myriad Genetics." These "forward-looking statements" are based on management's present expectations of future events and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those described or implied in the forward-looking statements. These risks include, but are not limited to: the risk that sales and profit margins of the Companys existing molecular diagnostic tests and pharmaceutical and clinical services may decline or will not continue to increase at historical rates; risks related to the Companys ability to successfully transition from its existing product portfolio to our new tests; risks related to changes in the governmental or private insurers reimbursement levels for the Companys tests or the Companys ability to obtain reimbursement for its new tests at comparable levels to its existing tests; risks related to increased competition and the development of new competing tests and services; the risk that the Company may be unable to develop or achieve commercial success for additional molecular diagnostic tests and pharmaceutical and clinical services in a timely manner, or at all; the risk that the Company may not successfully develop new markets for its molecular diagnostic tests and pharmaceutical and clinical services, including the Companys ability to successfully generate revenue outside the United States; the risk that licenses to the technology underlying the Companys molecular diagnostic tests and pharmaceutical and clinical services tests and any future tests are terminated or cannot be maintained on satisfactory terms; risks related to delays or other problems with operating the Companys laboratory testing facilities; risks related to public concern over the Companys genetic testing in general or the Companys tests in particular; risks related to regulatory requirements or enforcement in the United States and foreign countries and changes in the structure of the healthcare system or healthcare payment systems; risks related to the Companys ability to obtain new corporate collaborations or licenses and acquire new technologies or businesses on satisfactory terms, if at all; risks related to the Companys ability to successfully integrate and derive benefits from any technologies or businesses that it licenses or acquires; risks related to the Companys projections about the potential market opportunity for the Companys products; the risk that the Company or its licensors may be unable to protect or that third parties will infringe the proprietary technologies underlying the Companys tests; the risk of patent-infringement claims or challenges to the validity of the Companys patents; risks related to changes in intellectual property laws covering the Companys molecular diagnostic tests and pharmaceutical and clinical services and patents or enforcement in the United States and foreign countries, such as the Supreme Court decisions Mayo Collab. Servs. v. Prometheus Labs., Inc., 566 U.S. 66 (2012), Assn for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576 (2013), and Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Intl, 573 U.S. 208 (2014); risks of new, changing and competitive technologies and regulations in the United States and internationally; the risk that the Company may be unable to comply with financial operating covenants under the Companys credit or lending agreements; the risk that the Company will be unable to pay, when due, amounts due under the Companys credit or lending agreements; and other factors discussed under the heading "Risk Factors" contained in Item 1A of the Companys most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as any updates to those risk factors filed from time to time in the Companys Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or Current Reports on Form 8-K. All information in this press release is as of the date of the release, and Myriad undertakes no duty to update this information unless required by law.

Story continues

See the article here:
Myriad Withdrawing Financial Guidance for FY2020 Due to Business Impact from Coronavirus Pandemic - Yahoo Finance

Read More...

AHA, ACC, HRS Caution Use of COVID-19 Therapies Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in Cardiac Patients – Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiology

Friday, April 10th, 2020

April 8, 2020 The scientific community is learning more about the impact and interaction of cardiovascular diseases with novel coronavirus (COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2), including the impact of drug therapies being used and their negative cardiovascular impact. Together, the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) April 8 jointly published a new guidance, Considerations for Drug Interactions on QTc in Exploratory COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 19) Treatment, to detail critical cardiovascular considerations in the use of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin for the treatment of COVID-19.[1]

This guidance is published in Circulation, the journal of the American Heart Association, the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), and Heart Rhythm Journal, the official journal of the HRS.

The antimalarial medication hydroxychloroquine and the antibiotic azithromycin are currently gaining attention as potential treatments for COVID-19, and each have potential serious implications for people with existing cardiovascular disease. Complications include severe electrical irregularities in the heart such as arrythmia (irregular heartbeat), polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (including Torsade de Pointes) and long QT syndrome, and increased risk of sudden death. The effect on QT or arrhythmia of these two medications combined has not been studied.

The AHA, the ACC and the HRS guidance for health care professionals includes additional mechanisms to reduce the risk of arrhythmias. Steps outlined: Electrocardiographic/QT interval monitoring; Withhold hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in patients with baseline QT prolongation (e.g. QTc 500 msec) or with known congenital long QT syndrome; Monitor cardiac rhythm and QT interval; withdrawal of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin if QTc exceeds a present threshold of 500 msec; In patients critically ill with COVID-19 infection, frequent caregiver contact may need to be minimized, so optimal electrocardiographic interval and rhythm monitoring may not be possible; Correction of hypokalemia >4mEq/L and hypomagnesemia >2mg/dL; and Avoid other QTc prolonging agents whenever feasible.

The statement also includes a table rating potential adverse cardiac events of medications currently being repurposed for COVID-19 treatment, such as chloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir (antimalarial and antiviral agents, respectively).

The urgency of COVID-19 must not diminish the scientific rigor with which we approach COVID-19 treatment. While these medications may work against COVID-19 individually or in combination, we recommend caution with these medications for patients with existing cardiovascular disease, said Robert A. Harrington, M.D., FAHA, president of the American Heart Association, Arthur L. Bloomfield Professor of Medicine and chair of the department of medicine at Stanford University.

We are united in our mission to achieve optimal, quality care for our patients, and we must continue to be vigilant in assessing the potential complications of all medications during this crisis, stated Athena Poppas, M.D., president of the American College of Cardiology, professor of medicine at Brown University and chief of cardiology and director of the Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute at Rhode Island, the Miriam and Newport hospitals in Providence, Rhode Island.

Given the potential for increased risks related to combinations of medications that prolong the QT interval, we urge careful consideration to ensure patients with cardiovascular disease or others at increased risk can be monitored appropriately, stated Andrea M. Russo, M.D., president of the Heart Rhythm Society, director of Electrophysiology and Arrhythmia Services at Cooper University Hospital, director of the CCEP Fellowship Program, and professor of medicine at Cooper Medical School of Rowan University in Camden, New Jersey.

The statement is also co-authored by Dan M. Roden, M.D., C.M., interim division chief of cardiovascular medicine, senior vice president for personalized medicine, faculty of the clinical cardiac electrophysiology program, Sam Clark Chair in Experimental Therapeutics, professor of pharmacology and professor of biomedical informatics at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee.

AHA COVID-19 newsroom

For more information: HRSonline.org, acc.org

COVID-19 Hydroxychloroquine Treatment Brings Prolonged QT Arrhythmia Issues

No Evidence Supporting Discontinuing RAAS Inhibitors in COVID-19 Patients in NEJM Article

ESC Council on Hypertension Says ACE-I and ARBs Do Not Increase COVID-19 Mortality

FDA Approves ECMO to Treat COVID-19 Patients

Cardiology Related COVID-19 News and Videos

VIDEO: What Cardiologists Need to Know about COVID-19 Interview with Thomas Maddox, M.D.

Reference:

1. Dan M. Roden , Robert A. Harrington, Athena Poppas, and Andrea M. Russo. Considerations for Drug Interactions on QTc in Exploratory COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) Treatment. Circulation. Originally published 8 Apr 2020. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047521.

See the original post here:
AHA, ACC, HRS Caution Use of COVID-19 Therapies Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in Cardiac Patients - Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiology

Read More...

Personalized Medicine Market Increasing Demand with Leading Player, Comprehensive Analysis and Forecast 2026 – Science In Me

Friday, April 10th, 2020

New Jersey, United States:The Personalized Medicine Market is analyzed in depth in the report, with the primary aim of providing accurate market data and useful recommendations so that players can achieve strong growth in the future. The report is compiled by experts and experienced market analysts, which makes it very authentic and reliable. Readers have a thorough analysis of historical and future market scenarios to get a good understanding of market competition and other important issues. The report provides comprehensive information on market dynamics, key segments, key players and various regional markets. It is a complete set of in-depth analysis and research on the Personalized Medicine market.

The authors of the report highlighted lucrative business prospects, eye-catching trends, regulatory situations and Personalized Medicine market price scenarios. It is important to note that the report includes a detailed analysis of the macroeconomic and microeconomic factors affecting the growth of the Personalized Medicine market. It is divided into several sections and chapters so that you can easily understand every aspect of the Personalized Medicine market. Market participants can use the report to take a look at the future of the Personalized Medicine market and make significant changes to their operating style and marketing tactics in order to achieve sustainable growth.

Global Personalized Medicine Market was valued at USD 96.97 Billion in 2018 and is expected to witness a growth of 10.67% from 2019-2026 and reach USD 217.90 Billion by 2026.

Get | Download Sample Copy @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/download-sample/?rid=7106&utm_source=SIM&utm_medium=001

Key Players Mentioned in the Personalized Medicine Market Research Report:

The competitive landscape of the Personalized Medicine market is examined in detail in the report, with a focus on the latest developments, the future plans of the main players and the most important growth strategies that they have adopted. The analysts who have written the report have drawn a picture of almost all the main players in the Personalized Medicine market and highlighted their crucial commercial aspects such as production, areas of activity and product portfolio. All companies analyzed in the report are examined on the basis of important factors such as market share, market growth, company size, production volume, turnover and profit.

Personalized Medicine Market: Segmentation

The report provides an excellent overview of the key Personalized Medicine market segments, focusing on their CAGR, market size, market share and potential for future growth. The Personalized Medicine market is mainly divided by product type, application and region. Each segment in these categories is the subject of in-depth research to familiarize yourself with its growth prospects and key trends. The segment analysis is very important to identify the most important growth pockets of a global market. The report provides specific information on market growth and demand for various products and applications so that players can focus on profitable sectors of the Personalized Medicine market.

Ask For Discount (Special Offer: Get 25% discount on this report) @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/ask-for-discount/?rid=7106&utm_source=SIM&utm_medium=001

Table of Content

1 Introduction of Personalized Medicine Market1.1 Overview of the Market1.2 Scope of Report1.3 Assumptions

2 Executive Summary

3 Research Methodology of Verified Market Research3.1 Data Mining3.2 Validation3.3 Primary Interviews3.4 List of Data Sources

4 Personalized Medicine Market Outlook4.1 Overview4.2 Market Dynamics4.2.1 Drivers4.2.2 Restraints4.2.3 Opportunities4.3 Porters Five Force Model4.4 Value Chain Analysis

5 Personalized Medicine Market, By Deployment Model5.1 Overview

6 Personalized Medicine Market, By Solution6.1 Overview

7 Personalized Medicine Market, By Vertical7.1 Overview

8 Personalized Medicine Market, By Geography8.1 Overview8.2 North America8.2.1 U.S.8.2.2 Canada8.2.3 Mexico8.3 Europe8.3.1 Germany8.3.2 U.K.8.3.3 France8.3.4 Rest of Europe8.4 Asia Pacific8.4.1 China8.4.2 Japan8.4.3 India8.4.4 Rest of Asia Pacific8.5 Rest of the World8.5.1 Latin America8.5.2 Middle East

9 Personalized Medicine Market Competitive Landscape9.1 Overview9.2 Company Market Ranking9.3 Key Development Strategies

10 Company Profiles10.1.1 Overview10.1.2 Financial Performance10.1.3 Product Outlook10.1.4 Key Developments

11 Appendix11.1 Related Research

Complete Report is Available @https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/global-personalized-medicine-market-size-and-forecast-to-2026/?utm_source=SIM&utm_medium=001

We also offer customization on reports based on specific client requirement:

1-Freecountry level analysis forany 5 countriesof your choice.

2-FreeCompetitive analysis of any market players.

3-Free 40 analyst hoursto cover any other data points

About us:

Verified market research partners with the customer and offer an insight into strategic and growth analyzes, Data necessary to achieve corporate goals and objectives. Our core values are trust, integrity and authenticity for our customers.

Analysts with a high level of expertise in data collection and governance use industrial techniques to collect and analyze data in all phases. Our analysts are trained to combine modern data collection techniques, superior research methodology, expertise and years of collective experience to produce informative and accurate research reports.

Contact us:

Mr. Edwyne FernandesCall: +1 (650) 781 4080Email: [emailprotected]

Get Our Trending Report

https://www.marketresearchblogs.com/

https://www.marktforschungsblogs.com/

Tags: Personalized Medicine Market Size, Personalized Medicine Market Trends, Personalized Medicine Market Forecast, Personalized Medicine Market Growth, Personalized Medicine Market Analysis

Continued here:
Personalized Medicine Market Increasing Demand with Leading Player, Comprehensive Analysis and Forecast 2026 - Science In Me

Read More...

Predictive Technology Group Announces Initial Order of One Million Units of the Assurance AB COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Antibody Test from Distribution…

Friday, April 10th, 2020

SALT LAKE CITY, April 08, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Predictive Laboratories, a wholly owned subsidiary of Predictive Technology Group (OTC PINK: PRED) (Predictive or The Company), today shared that its distribution partner, Wellgistics, has submitted an initial order for immediate delivery of one (1) million units of the Assurance AB COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Antibody Test (Assurance AB) intended for use by laboratories and healthcare workers at the point-of-care in the U.S.

We have been working diligently withWellgisticsto get this first order put in motion, even prior to making our partnership announcement on April 3, said Bradley Robinson, CEO of Predictive Technology Group. This country is in high need of theAssurance ABtesting for point of care use and we have brought all resources to bear to bring this product to the United States. Wellgistics has provided us with state-by-state demand guidance, to ensure that regions with the most urgent need have first access to the test. Our main priorities will be to focus on servicing those areas, Robinson continued.

When our partnership with Predictive was announced last week, our team was very aware of the coming tsunami wave of interest for this test, said Brian Norton, CEO of Wellgistics. This demand grows each day as more attention hits the media and is recognized as a viable solution toward identifying immunity and allowing people to go back to work. Presently, the Wellgistics team is hyper focused on closing the final gaps of the complex web of international logistics. We feel great about where we are, and we will provide new updates as quickly as they are available.

Predictive announced website updates relating to Assurance AB including:Instructions For Use, Quick Reference Guide and Fact Sheet for laboratories and healthcare workers at the point-of-care. The website also includes an instructional video on administering the Assurance AB test.

About Predictive Technology Group, Inc.

Predictive Technology Group aims to revolutionize and personalize precision patient care. The Companys entities harness predictive gene-based analytics to develop genetic and molecular diagnostic tests and companion therapeutics in order to support a patient from diagnosis through treatment.

Dedicated to identifying the barriers that impact lifelong health through our genetic library, genomic mapping and individualized diagnostics, Predictives tests and products empower clinicians to provide their patients with the highest level of care. For more information, visit http://www.predtechgroup.com

About Predictive Laboratories, Inc.

Predictive Laboratories molecular and genetic diagnostics focus on hard-to-diagnose and hard-to-detect diseases. Leveraging its vast genetic library, Predictive offers earlier detection of a variety of diseases through genetic assessments to guide personalized precision medicine.

Equipped with a state-of-the-art CAP and CLIA accredited laboratory, Predictive operations perform next-generation sequencing experiments, including whole exome sequencing, gene and genetic marker panels, and low-pass whole genome analysis of embryos for aneuploidies. Predictive arms physicians with the most robust diagnostic tools to provide personalized precision treatment for their patients. For more information, visit http://www.predictivelabs.com

Forward-Looking Statements:

To the extent any statements made in this release contain information that is not historical, these statements are essentially forward-looking and are subject to risks and uncertainties, including the difficulty of predicting FDA approvals, acceptance and demand for human cell and tissue products and other pharmaceutical products, the impact of competitive products and pricing, new product development and launch, reliance on key strategic alliances, availability of raw materials, availability of additional intellectual property rights, availability of future financing sources, the regulatory environment, and other risks the Company may identify from time to time in the future. These forward-looking statements are based on the current plans and expectations of management and are subject to a number of uncertainties and risks that could significantly affect the company's current plans and expectations, as well as future results of operations and financial condition. A more extensive listing of risks and factors that may affect the company's business prospects and cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements can be found in the reports and other documents filed by the company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Story continues

Contacts:

Predictive LaboratoriesInfo@predictivelabs.com855-497-3636

Investor ContactJeremy FefferLifeSci Advisorsjeremy@lifesciadvisors.com212-915-2568

Read more here:
Predictive Technology Group Announces Initial Order of One Million Units of the Assurance AB COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Antibody Test from Distribution...

Read More...

The nucleic acid isolation and purification industry analysis by BIS Research projects the market to grow at a significant CAGR of 5.98% during the…

Friday, April 10th, 2020

Global Nucleic Acid Isolation and Purification Market to Reach $3,835.2 Million by 2029

NEW YORK, April 9, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --

Read the full report: https://www.reportlinker.com/p05881508/?utm_source=PRN

Key Questions Answered in this Report: What are the major market drivers, challenges, and opportunities in the global nucleic acid isolation and purification market? What are the key development strategies which are being implemented by major players in order to sustain in the competitive market? How each segment of the market is expected to grow during the forecast period from 2020 to 2029 based on o product type: instrument and consumables (kits and reagents) o end User: academic research institutes, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, applied testing, contract research organizations, and clinical diagnostic centers o region, North America, EMEA, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America Which are the leading players with significant offerings to the global nucleic acid isolation and purification market? What is the expected market dominance for each of these leading players? Which companies are anticipated to be highly disruptive in the future and why? What are the challenges in the nucleic acid isolation and purification market?

Global Nucleic Acid Isolation and Purification Market Forecast, 2020-2029

The nucleic acid isolation and purification industry analysis projects the market to grow at a significant CAGR of 5.98% during the forecast period, 2020-2029. The nucleic acid isolation and purification market generated $2,273.9 million revenue in 2020, in terms of value. The nucleic acid isolation and purification market growth has been primarily attributed to the major drivers in this market, such as growing number of genetic tests, increasing demand for reliable next-generation sequencing (NGS) results, rise in the prevalence of infectious diseases, increasing research funding in the field of molecular biology, and increase in awareness and acceptance of personalized medicine on a global level. However, genomic data protection, high cost of automated instruments, and rigid regulatory standards are some of the factors expected to retrain the market growth.

Expert Quote

"As molecular diagnostic testing moves into the clinical laboratory environment, products used to collect and process samples will need to be standardized"

Scope of the Market Intelligence on Nucleic Acid Isolation and Purification Market

The nucleic acid isolation and purification research provides a holistic view of the market in terms of various factors influencing it, including regulatory reforms, and technological advancements.

The scope of this report is centered upon conducting a detailed study of the products and manufacturers. In addition, the study also includes exhaustive information on the drivers, restraints opportunities, perception of the new products, competitive landscape, market share of leading manufacturers, growth potential of each underlying sub-segment, and company, as well as other vital information with respect to global nucleic acid isolation and purification market.

Market Segmentation

The nucleic acid isolation and purification market (on the basis of product type) is segmented into instruments and consumables (kits and reagents).

The kits segment (on the basis of technology) has been classified into magnetic particle technology, silica technology, and other technologies. The other technologies have been broadly bifurcated into anion-exchange technology, lysis, precipitation-based chemistries, organic extraction, fluorescence, and other kits technologies.

Further, the instruments (on the basis of technology) has been classified into automated spin-column based and bead-based. The bead-based technology has been further bifurcated into magnetic bead-based and automated liquid handling.

The nucleic acid isolation and purification market (on the basis of applications) is segmented into PCR, qPCR, NGS, cloning, microarray, blotting techniques, and other applications.

The nucleic acid isolation and purification market (on the basis of end-user) is segmented into academic research institutes, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, applied testing, biobanks, contract research organizations, hospital research laboratories, and clinical diagnostic centers.

The nucleic acid isolation and purification market (on the basis of region) is segmented into North America, EMEA, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America.

Key Companies in the Nucleic Acid Isolation and Purification Market

The key manufacturers who have been contributing significantly to the nucleic acid isolation and purification market are Agilent Technologies, Inc., Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., F.Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Illumina, Inc., General Electric Company (GE), New England Biolabs, Inc., Promega Corporation, Merck KGaA, Takara Bio Inc., QIAGEN N.N., Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., and Promega Corporation, among others.

Countries Covered North America U.S. Canada Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA) Latin America (LATAM) Asia-Pacific China Japan Rest-of-APAC

Read the full report: https://www.reportlinker.com/p05881508/?utm_source=PRN

About Reportlinker ReportLinker is an award-winning market research solution. Reportlinker finds and organizes the latest industry data so you get all the market research you need - instantly, in one place.

__________________________ Contact Clare: clare@reportlinker.com US: (339)-368-6001 Intl: +1 339-368-6001

Story continues

View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-nucleic-acid-isolation-and-purification-industry-analysis-by-bis-research-projects-the-market-to-grow-at-a-significant-cagr-of-5-98-during-the-forecast-period-2020-2029--301038446.html

SOURCE Reportlinker

Read the original post:
The nucleic acid isolation and purification industry analysis by BIS Research projects the market to grow at a significant CAGR of 5.98% during the...

Read More...

Biotech Stocks: Big Buying Opportunities in 2020s Sector of the Year – Investorplace.com

Friday, April 10th, 2020

Theres nothing better as an investor than owning shares of companies that improve our lives. At the top of that list is companies that help us live healthier, longer lives.

Source: Shutterstock

Back in November which seems like an eternity ago I wrote that 2020 would be the Year of Biotech. Neither I nor anyone else knew how critical medical sciences and healthcare would become just a few months later amid a worldwide pandemic.

I still see 2020 as the Year of Biotech.

These stocks have shown relative strength in the bear market, and the current crisis gives us a glimpse of the innovative breakthroughs coming our way including efforts to fight the coronavirus.

In a volatile stock market like this, you can buy most stocks at a massive discount. Big names are down 20% 30% even 50%. Some small-cap stocks have slid even more.

This rare situation has opened up an unusual buying opportunity that we havent seen for at least the past decade or longer.

Fundamentally, the investment mega-trends Im following including in my new Crisis and Opportunity Portfolio are still on track. The coronavirus has scrambled everyones plans for the moment, but it wont last. The market has recovered from every past bear market, and were seeing glimmers of hope in the number of new cases around the world.

Ive been saying for more than week now that its time to start investing in stocks again. Believe me, trying to pick an exact bottom isnt worth the risk. Instead, you have to focus on the trends that will spawn the markets next big winners.

Biotechnology is one of these unstoppable mega-trends.

In 2019, before the coronavirus was on anyones mind, investors poured $13.9 billion into biotech startups. That was $4 billion less than 2018s record-breaking number but still higher than any other year on record.

The industry was climbing to new heights as companies began using next-generation technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) to find new drugs for diseases like cancer quicker and cheaper than ever before.

Another cutting-edge technology thats been on the rise is genomics, which will usher in a new era of personalized medicine for each patient as well as speed up the creation of new drugs.

And at this particular moment, it makes sense that investors would take notice as biotechs around the world are on high alert to find better drugs and/or a vaccine to tame the coronavirus.

Indeed, the sector has held steady through the recent volatility. Its one of the broader markets top performers.

So far this year, the S&P 500 is down more than 17% while theVanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (NASDAQ:BBH) is down closer to 5.6%. Thats far better than some of the other sectors that you might think would be strong right now like household products and food and staples retailing, which are both down 15%, according to Fidelity.

Yes, many biotech stocks are down at the moment. But that sets up an incredible chance to get some of the best at a discount.

Right now, more than 140 experimental coronavirus treatments and vaccines are in the works worldwide, according to theWall Street Journal. Researchers are moving at record pace, setting up 254 clinical trials to test drugs and/or vaccines in a matter of weeks or days.

Whether a given company is a part of this effort or not, nearly every biotech has been impacted by the pandemic. For instance, clinical trials are getting pushed back while healthcare facilities around the globe have shut down for fear of spreading the virus.

But the delay is short term. And longtimeMoneyWirereaders know that we focus on the long-term big picture.

Artificial intelligence and genomics already play a key role in the biotech industry as companies try to find a workable solution for whats ailing all of us.

And unlike the recent focus on producing protective equipment and coronavirus tests that will likely fizzle after the worst has passed,the use of these technologies will only continue to grow.

My #1 stock in theCrisis and Opportunity Portfoliothat I just released last week is a great example. The company uses AI in its predictive analytics to improve patient care and lower costs for insurance companies. Part of that involves the exploding trend of telehealth.

Telehealth includes the virtual doctors visits that are keeping us all out of waiting rooms during the pandemic. But I suspect doctors and patients alike will stick with the convenience and efficiency of the service long after the current crisis passes.

This stock lost a lot of ground in the sell-off, but it is already up 33% since I recommended it last Wednesday. The company is forecast to deliver 61% annual revenue growth and has a clear path to profitability, which is important when investing in smaller companies. I see a lot more upside to come.

Finding the best small companies in the best industries like biotech that will see the biggest gains as we recover is what my newCrisis and Opportunity Portfoliois all about.

Ive handpicked the companies best positioned to soar, and were adding them strategically one by one. Thats the smartest way to buy in this still-volatile market.

The current selling is setting up amazing buying opportunities in investment trends that wont slow due to the pandemic. The key is knowingwhich ones represent the best potential over the long term.

Matthew McCall left Wall Street to actually help investors by getting them into the worlds biggest, most revolutionary trends BEFORE anyone else. The power of being first gave Matts readers the chance to bank +2,438% in Stamps.com (STMP), +1,523% in Ulta Beauty (ULTA) and +1,044% in Tesla (TSLA), just to name a few. Click here to see what Matt has up his sleeve now.Matt does not directly own the aforementioned securities.

Original post:
Biotech Stocks: Big Buying Opportunities in 2020s Sector of the Year - Investorplace.com

Read More...

An update on COVID-19 from an Orcas Island nurse practitioner | Guest… – Journal of the San Juan Islands

Friday, April 10th, 2020

Editors note, April 9: This article is an opinion piece. Just like all opinion pieces, the opinions expressed within should be taken as such. It bears repeating that all personal medical decisions should be made with your primary care physician and not based on an opinion article.

By Mara Williams, ANP-BC

Orcas Island

Dietrich Klinghardt, MD, Ph.D., an internationally renowned physician, spoke at a virtual integrative medicine conference that I attended. He shared the latest information on COVID-19. He discussed pharmaceutical and integrative ways to treat the virus.

Seventy-five percent of those affected are male. Other risk factors are obesity, Diabetes and underlying respiratory disease. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) occurs in 30 percent of those who contract the virus. Incubation is 4-7 days, with a few cases at 12 days. A new antibody test is recently available that is more accurate. The virus can last on smooth, shiny surfaces for up to 72 hours. Soap and water work better than alcohol based sanitizers.

Symptoms are fever, followed by a dry, hacking cough, and fatigue.

To prevent catching the virus, wash your hands with soap and water frequently. Avoid touching your face. Avoid close contact. Wear a mask in public.

If you have high blood pressure and are taking an ACE Inhibitors like Lisinopril, ask your provider to switch you to an ARB Inhibitor, like Losartan. The ACE Inhibitors allow the virus to move into the lungs. Do not take non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, (aspirin, ibuprofen, Advil, naproxen) as they will allow the virus to get into the lungs. Do not take extra selenium besides what is found in a multivitamin/mineral as it speeds entry into the lungs. Finally, colloidal silver is not as effective as it usually is with viral illnesses.

Fortunately, the FDA has approved Plaquenil (hydroxychloroquine) and Azithromycin for use with COVID-19. It has been shown to be 100 percent effective. Another medication used as an anti-parasite drug also works. It is called Alinia.

For those that prefer an integrative approach, Andrographis and Vitamin C, in combination, are as effective as the two medications above. Dr. Klinghardt recommends using a tincture and a dose of two dropperfuls of Andrographis four times daily with Vitamin C at 2000 mg each time.

Also, it is important to use Liposomal Vitamin C as it is equal to the Intravenous route. Thus, 1000 mg liposomal C is equal to 1000 mg IV C. The amount of Vitamin C to take is based upon your weight. So, take 100-200 mg C/kg/body weight (a KG = 2.2 lb.). Quercetin is a strong anti-inflammatory that is helpful as well. Nettle is full of Quercetin, so in the islands, it is young, fresh and potent now. Propolis tincture to swish and swallow is helpful multiple times a day.

To prevent getting this flu virus, take a minimum of 2000 mg of Vitamin C daily with food. Add 5000-10000 IU Vitamin D3 daily with food. Vitamin D3 is excellent for the immune system. Optimum levels are between 60-80.

Editors note: Hydroxychloroquine, a medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration for malaria, has not been medically proven to cure or prevent COVID-19.

The rest is here:
An update on COVID-19 from an Orcas Island nurse practitioner | Guest... - Journal of the San Juan Islands

Read More...

Is It OK To Visit Someone’s House If You’re Both Social Distancing? – mindbodygreen.com

Friday, April 10th, 2020

Limiting in-person contact with others is currently the best way to reduce the spread of the coronavirus. Social distancing, also known as physical distancing, should be practiced by everyoneeven those who are seemingly healthy. According to the CDC guidelines, social distancing means "keeping space between yourself and other people outside of your home."

Specifically, they recommend staying a minimum of 6 feet away from others, avoiding crowded places, and not gathering in large or small groups. "When COVID-19 is spreading in your area, everyone should limit close contact with individuals outside your household in indoor and outdoor spaces," the CDC writes. "Avoid large and small gatherings in private places and public spaces, such as a friend's house, parks, restaurants, shops, or any other place."

Only going back and forth between your apartment and one other person's apartment to spend one-on-one time together may or may not count as a group gathering. But it does involve coming into close proximity or contact with someone outside your home.

"If people want to see their partner regularly, it would probably be more beneficial not to commute back and forth," integrative medicine doctor Amy Shah, M.D., tells us. Instead, you can temporarily move in together, or choose to stay apart and connect virtually for the time being.

If the people in both households are practicing thorough hand hygiene, wearing masks in public, and are able to travel both ways without breaking social distancing guidelines, it might be OK to go back and forth. The risks of doing so are just higher than if you were to shelter in one place, especially if either of you has roommates.

Read the original:
Is It OK To Visit Someone's House If You're Both Social Distancing? - mindbodygreen.com

Read More...

The Importance of Medically Treating Both the Body and the Mind – Thrive Global

Friday, April 10th, 2020

Dr. Erika Schwartz is an internationally known pioneer in the field of preventative health care that focuses on preventing disease by addressing lifestyles, whole body and mind treatments. She was one of the first doctors in the US to treat patients with bio-identical hormones, conduct biomarker testing, and to administer preventative IVs. She is a graduate of NYU and received her MD from SUNY-Downstate College of Medicine Cum Laude. She is a member of the Alpha Omega Alpha honor society and the author of six books. We discuss her journey from medical school to forming her own integrative approach to healthcare that seeks to prevent disease by taking a holistic and long-term understanding of each patient. (Our conversation has been condensed and edited for clarity.)

What made you shift from a conventional medicine to a preventative, integrative approach?

The traditional route just wasnt working for me. I have always thought of myself as a healer. I come from a family full of doctors and was exposed to conventional medicine from very early on. From the age of five I wanted to be a doctor. In my mind, I thought becoming one was the ultimate access to becoming a healer. It would provide the credentials and scientific training to heal people. I was wrong. Conventional medicine does not have the tools necessary to heal. Conventional medicine waits for something to go bad, it is there to diagnose, label and treat disease. It is reactive rather than preventative.

Where did you start your journey?

My first job at the age of twenty eight was working as a trauma surgeon. When people are really sick and they are brought to a trauma centre, their lives are usually saved. But I also noticed that sometimes people survived when they shouldnt have and there were other times when people died when they shouldnt have. It occured to me that we didnt have the decision making powers that we thought we had to save lives. I moved from emergency trauma care to my own private practice because I wanted an ongoing relationship with my patients. I realised very quickly that I was wasting mine and my patients time by always looking for something wrong that I could diagnose and then kickstart the process of referring them to specialists. It dawned on me that there was this huge amount of time that was being wasted when you were waiting for something to go wrong. I never asked a patient for example, although everything is normal with your medical tests, I can see that you are clearly still fatigued and facing issues so let us talk about your family life, about the stressors in your life, your thoughts, sleep and eating habits. I started thinking about what I c

What was the perception from others when you started this alternative medicine route?

There wasnt much in the field and a lot of alternative medicine was quackery. Yoga and meditation were considered Eastern things, out there. Supplements were considered harmful because they treated everything and at medical school, we are taught that every drug treats something specific. This is not true. We just call it side effects in medicines. So it took me a while to unlearn these views and form my own opinion of how to effectively heal patients.

What led you to question the current healthcare system and adopt your own, unique approach to treating patients?

Conventional medicine is centred around public health, which has made a lot of incredible achievements such as eradicating smallpox. But its also done a lot of harm such as creating a world that is dependent on the outcomes of public health, when in fact we are all individuals with our own unique makeup and dont all necessarily fit into the same, unilateral approach. When you look at treating disease from a public health perspective, you are looking at numbers and the whole population at large. Youre not looking at the individual level, at patients. We become unimportant because we are only seen in the millions. I want to bring this down to the individual level, to empower people to take control of their health and remove the fear that is created by health officials. There is this prevailing notion that doctors know whats best for you. Its not doctors, its you. Its your body and only you can know what feels right for yourself. The role of a doctor should be to teach their patients to listen to their bodies.

Can you describe your current approach to treating patients?

After running a trauma centre and observing sick people, it dawned on me that doctors dont have to wait for people to suffer from disease. I thought we should figure out ways to help people prevent disease from occurring. I stumbled upon hormones because no one was looking at them. Hormones explain how we fit together and how the body is governed. I realised you need a complete approach, looking at diet, stress, mindfulness and all the psychological aspects of the patient. You need to understand the entire patient and their environment to know what is making them feel suboptimal. It takes decades from the point of feeling suboptimal to getting sick and it is possible to prevent something from going wrong by starting to detect the symptoms early on.

When someone comes in, the first thing I ask is how they are really feeling. It is a physiological response as when a patient knows that a doctor cares about you and is listening to you, you are more likely to heal. It gives me an instant, deep connection to the patient. They need to think about how they are feeling so they have to become mindful of themselves, separate from the doctor. Its in their hands to tell the doctor about their health and wellbeing and the doctors role to listen. The doctor serves the patient.

Follow us here and subscribe here for all the latest news on how you can keep Thriving.

Stay up to date or catch-up on all our podcasts with Arianna Huffington here.

Read the original here:
The Importance of Medically Treating Both the Body and the Mind - Thrive Global

Read More...

China is encouraging herbal remedies to treat COVID-19. But scientists warn against it. – NBC News

Friday, April 10th, 2020

As China appears to emerge from the worst of its coronavirus outbreak, government officials are encouraging the use of traditional medicine for treatment and prevention a practice experts warned could give the public a false sense of security amid the pandemic.

Chinas National Health Commission reported last month that of the more than 80,000 people infected with COVID-19 since the outbreak began in December, 90 percent took some form of traditional Chinese medicine to treat their symptoms.

According to Yu Yanhong, secretary of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, speaking at a March 23 press conference in Wuhan, traditional remedies have alleviated symptoms, reduced the severity of the virus, improved recovery rates and reduced mortality rate.

But herbal remedies which China is exporting as part of its efforts to combat the coronavirus around the world pose both direct and indirect risks to patients, Dr. Edzard Ernst, a professor emeritus of complementary medicine at the United Kingdoms University of Exeter, said in an email.

"TCM mixtures can be toxic, contaminated or adulterated with prescription drugs; they can also interact with prescription drugs," Ernst said. It can also give patients a false sense of security, leading them to neglect proven medications or therapies.

Traditional Chinese medicine has been around for more than 3,000 years and includes a variety of diagnostic approaches, such as the physical examination of a patients pulse and tongue, and a range of treatments, including ingesting herbs such as ginseng, and acupuncture.

It accounts for up to half of all medicines consumed in China, according to the World Health Organization. More than 7,000 herbal drugs available through pharmacies are regulated by the National Medical Products Administration.

"It is a legal health system in China which is parallel with Western medicine, and of course, there is also integration between traditional medicine and Western medicine," Dr. Jianping Liu, professor of clinical epidemiology at the Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, told NBC News.

"It's a holistic approach."

The main herbal formulas recommended for treatment of COVID-19 are jinhua qinggan capsules, lianhua qingwen capsules and shufeng jiedu capsules, according to Liu.

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

These remedies consist of a combination of dozens of herbs and a clear breakdown isnt widely available, Liu said.

The lack of detail about the remedies contributes to doubts over their efficacy, Dan Larhammar, a molecular cell biologist and president of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, said in a phone interview.

We need to know which specific product is claimed to work and what is the evidence, he said, before going on to cite the importance of understanding different variations of penicillin.

Recent reports in the Japanese journal BioScience Trends and the Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine support the various COVID-19 traditional treatments, but Larhammar said these studies and others like them lack scientific rigor not having adequate sample sizes, using vague terms and nonpharmacological concepts or testing too many combinations of herbs to parse out their specific effects.

They are like parodies. Nobody can take this seriously, he said in an email.

Yet, traditional Chinese medicine is being championed not only in China, but also overseas.

Since the rate of cases and deaths in Hubei province began to plateau, the Chinese government has offered aid to other countries overwhelmed by the spread help that according to the state media ranges from test kits to traditional Chinese medicine practitioners and products.

The country sent 100,000 boxes of a remedy called lianhuaqingwen to Italy this month, according to the Chinese broadcaster CGTN. A 12-member team of physicians also sent to support the outbreak in Milan included two traditional Chinese medicine specialists, the Global Times state newspaper reported.

In the United Kingdom, growing numbers of patients of traditional Chinese medicine have been asking for remedies to prevent and treat COVID-19 since the outbreak began in December, said Qikan Yin, general manager of the Institute of Chinese Medicine in London.

Although closed due to the ongoing U.K. lockdown, Yin said practitioners were still doing remote consultations and prescribing appropriate remedies to patients, including one London-based couple in their 50s who were confirmed to have the virus.

Addressing doubts surrounding the treatments, Yin said, The argument is always there, not only for this disease.

Clinical trials are very difficult to show the actual benefit of traditional herbs, not just Chinese but also traditional Western herbs, he said.

It would be fine if the method reduced the symptoms a little bit, and more the better, of course, but if that makes the person take more risks, then we are in deep trouble, Larhammar of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said.

People with the virus may prematurely resume interacting with others thinking theyre no longer infectious by taking traditional Chinese medicine, he explained. Others may take it thinking it prevents them from getting the disease, putting themselves and others at risk.

Until there is more evidence to suggest any effectiveness of such traditional Chinese medicine, it should be treated as a nonissue, Steve Tsang, director of the China Institute at the SOAS University of London, said.

Its causing distraction from questions that could be embarrassing for the Chinese government, he explained of the political posturing.

Chinas alleged mishandling of the first few cases of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus should be the focus of attention, he said, whether that involves asking whether China could have shared its data earlier, and the quantity and quality of supplies it's now exporting to other countries hit by the disease.

Instead, against the backdrop of President Donald Trumps comments referring to COVID-19 as a Chinese virus, the Chinese Communist Party can champion traditional medicine while dismissing its critics as being racist and play favorably to peoples emotions, Tsang said.

You love the party because the party is the one that defends your traditional medicine, your national honor, your heritage, he said.

Read this article:
China is encouraging herbal remedies to treat COVID-19. But scientists warn against it. - NBC News

Read More...

Page 28«..1020..27282930..»


2025 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick