StemCell Therapy

The pursuit of new medical treatments often hinges on the balance between the efficacy of the drug and the adverse effects it causes. A key part of that balance is deciding on recommended dosing for a given treatment.

Opioids provide an excellent example of the challenge in maintaining that balance and the risks of non-ideal dosing. 20% of patients experiencing pain are prescribed opioids even though the recommended dose of the drugs will cause 50-80% of patients to experience some serious adverse effects. OxyContins standard dose was discovered to wear off early for many leading some users to take dangerously high amounts.

The problem with dosing is well known in the medical community. For instance, some doctors have advocated using much lower doses than recommended on product monographs in non-severe situations. Similarly, for cancer treatments, high dosing levels are being challenged as advanced treatments like immunotherapy gain popularity.

Problems exist on the other end of the spectrum as well. Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs NSAIDs are a common over-the-counter pain treatment and a 2018 study found that 15% of people took dangerously high amounts to reduce their pain. One explanation for the overuse was the lack of sufficient pain relief provided by the recommended dose. Taken in large quantities, the drugs can cause serious stomach issues.

A major reason for these dosing issues is that decisions are made on a statistical basis for large sample patient populations. The variability of these populations, including differences in height, weight, and ethnic background, make it unlikely that recommended doses will be ideal for everyone. Fortunately, as medicine is opening to non-pharmaceutical options, personalization is becoming easier. As a result, a new paradigm for dosing is emerging.

Personalized MedicinePersonalized medicine, a medical approach that optimizes both response and safety for individual patients, provides an alternative model to dosing that considers individual patient needs. For instance, 5% of the population do not get pain relief from codeine while others have it stay in the body too long due to their genetics. The ability to identify a patients genetics can help doctors make dosing decisions.

Unfortunately, genetics-based personalized medicine is costly and complicated for various reasons such as increased training and adapting electronic health records. An alternative approach is to allow patients to try different doses in cooperation with their physicians to discover the ideal balance. With pharmaceuticals though, this can mean delaying an effective treatment or exposing patients to adverse reactions and drug interactions.

Personalization Through DevicesOne solution that is gaining popularity is to turn to non-pharmaceutical medical devices when possible. These devices allow for a far greater range of safe treatment options that a patient can adjust even during a single treatment. For example, several medical devices using electrical neuromodulation have been developed to treat pain, spinal injuries, epilepsy, migraine, and other conditions. The devices stimulate nerves through electrical pulses delivered at different intensities to treat the given problem. Essentially, these intensities are the doses, but because they are not interacting with the body as pharmaceuticals do, they allow for a wider range of treatment options.

More than just a new technological solution, the possibility presented by these and similar medical devices is significant. User-controlled customization of the intensity of each treatment will both engage users and create a far higher chance of finding an ideal dose for each patient. Chronic pain patients, who may be more reliant on frequent use of pharmaceuticals, could especially benefit as they are most susceptible to having to limit dosing even if it makes the therapy less successful.

Back to the NSAID issue mentioned above, it is very easy for patients to take a third Advil pill for pain relief without sensing the danger of overdosing. With devices delivering electronic stimulation, the feeling of intensity is an immediate sensational signal that places a natural limit on the dose, without any serious long-term negative effects. Patients can trust that they can take a high yet tolerable dose safely. If their issue is still not solved, they can go back to their doctor to try different treatments.

ConclusionPersonalizing dosing is the future of treatment development. Allowing for individual patients to select their ideal dose will improve outcomes and reduce adverse events. Some aspects of personalization, such as seamlessly incorporating a patients genetics into dosing decisions, is still too costly to apply widely. However, we can create new treatments that give patients more control and safe choices, such as those provided by medical devices.

Pains ubiquity and its ability to be treated through medical devices make it a perfect target for this new approach. As with any new paradigm though, we need to educate patients and medical professionals about this new possibility. Furthermore, we need to lower costs and improve insurance processes to make sure that they are available to everyone.

If we do so, we will not only support patients (or customize treatment), but we will also improve outcomes and save money by avoiding adverse events.

Photo: Olena Agapova, Getty Images

See the original post:
Moving beyond one-dose-fits-all: How medtech and personalized dosing can improve outcomes - MedCity News

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (PRWEB) September 14, 2020

CerFlux, Inc., creators of advanced personalized medicine technology for specifically matching treatments to each cancer patients tumor before treatment, announced today the receipt of a $249,148 National Cancer Institute R43 grant to help fund continuing development of its low-cost, rapid Personalized Oncology Efficacy Test (POET) for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

What makes this endeavor particularly noteworthy is that it will not only expand the body of knowledge but, if successful, transform cancer treatment around the world. Today, less than 3% of funded research makes such a leap across the valley of death from new knowledge to innovation.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is among the deadliest cancers, with a less than 9% five-year survival rate. Without advances in technology like POET, the death rate from PDAC is estimated to increase to 60,000 deaths/year within the next 10 years. What makes PDAC particularly insidious is that a large number of patients arent diagnosed until the disease is at an advanced stage. While research and discovery are making new treatment options available, the lack of tools to quickly select the right treatment for each patient on a personalized basis creates a frustrating paradox in clinical decision-making. This is because every tumor is unique in its makeup and its response to treatment.

Without personalized predictive tools like POET, treatment is based on generalized parameters such as age, disease stage, etc. often leading to a mismatch between treatments and tumors. Consequently, about 75% of patients nearly 3 out of 4 have to endure first line chemotherapy that turns out to be ineffective because the treatment regimen did not match the patients tumor, imposing a substantial physical, emotional, and financial burden.

CerFlux POET addresses this critical, urgent, and unmet need for accessible and affordable predictive technologies that identify optimal therapy regimens and strategically eliminate ineffective options.

Our goal for this phase of the project is to identify best practices for using POET in personalized therapy and to measure the degree to which the effectiveness of the treatment observed in POET approximates the response in the corresponding patient. The idea is to not only predict which ones will be effective but also identify those which would be potentially ineffective for that specific patient to reduce the pain and time, explains CerFlux CEO Dr. Karim Budhwani.

This endeavor is further enhanced by a commercial-academic collaboration between CerFlux, Inc. and the James Comprehensive Cancer Center at the Ohio State University. This NCI funded project will build on recent work by the CerFlux team including a patented (US 10,114,010B1) biomimetic in vitro platform for pharmacological transport and pancreatic microtissue tumor models.

Dr. Allan Tsung, Director of the Gastrointestinal Disease Specific Research Group, adds, "I truly believe that the best cancer care is multidisciplinary care and similarly, advances in cancer research requires team science with multidisciplinary collaboration. The most innovative answers to problems are when you bring together ideas from different fields. Our team working together with CerFlux, Inc., embraces the belief at the Ohio State James Comprehensive Cancer Center that 'there is no routine cancer'. With advances in technology like POET, we strive to offer groundbreaking, personalized treatment options for all our patients battling cancer."

Predictive technologies like POET that match each patient with the right treatment regimen BEFORE treatment is administered will transform pancreatic cancer treatment in the near-term and make a difference in the lives of patients and their families, as well as providers around the world.

About CerFlux, Inc.CerFlux, Inc., a Birmingham, Alabama, based biotech company, is creating advanced, personalized medicine solutions to rapidly identify the most effective cancer treatments for each patient on an individualized basis. While breakthroughs in biopharma discovery are helping to produce a library of treatment options, many new therapeutics are becoming more specialized and therefore effective for smaller populations. This underscores an even greater need for matching treatments to tumors on an individualized basis; ironically, cancer is a ubiquitous rare disease. Our goal is to build solutions that quickly and clearly separate optimal from ineffective options, so clinical teams can successfully treat the disease thereby improving treatment outcomes and quality of life for cancer patients.

Additional InformationTo request collateral materials for publication or to schedule interviews with principals from CerFlux, Inc., please contact Rebecca Dobrinski at rsd@CerFlux.com or 205.335.3434 for availability.

Share article on social media or email:

Read this article:
CERFLUX Announces National Cancer Institute Award - PR Web

A policy initiative was set up 5 years ago with the goal of spreading the adoption of a therapeutic strategy to maximize the brain health of every person with MS. The principle idea was that MS should be treated as effectively as early as possible, said Gavin Giovannoni, MBBCh, PhD, FCP (Neurol., SA), FRCP, FRCPath, chair of neurology at the Blizard Institute in the Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry at Queen Mary University of London.

This means intervening early and effectively to affect the trajectory of MS over time. Im convinced we are doing this now, he said.

In the predisease-modifying therapy (DMT) era, by age 65, more than 80% of patients with MS needed a walking stick1. However, by the era of low-efficacy DMTs, that proportion was down to 60%, and now, in the high-efficacy era of DMTs, that proportion has fallen further, to 20% to 30% of patients needing a walking stick by the age of 65.

So, theres no doubt that by adopting this early, effective treatment approach, we have a major impact on the overall outcome, Giovannoni explained.

However, the challenge remains: how do we determine which patients with MS will respond to treatments? If there are 100 patients, its not clear who will or wont respond to therapy, and the only real option is to use statistical modeling.

Providers have to decide if they want to gamble on low- or high-efficacy therapies when they initiate treatment. Should they start with low-efficacy and move through the tiers or go right to the top tier from the outset?

Research has shown that early access to high-efficacy DMTs results in better outcomes. For fingolimod, natalizumab, and alemtuzumab the response rates are much higher, and they are associated with a lower risk of conversion to secondary progressive MS compared with therapies like interferon beta or glatiramer acetate.2 In addition, patients who started on high-efficacy therapies within 2 years of disease onset had less disability after 6 to 10 years than patients who started high-efficacy therapy later in the disease course.3

Theres little doubt in my mindearly access is whats important, Giovannoni said. Early access not late access.

However, treatment is not only about efficacypatients are going to be exposed to serious adverse events on these therapies. This is when patient choice becomes important. Providers will need to take into account issues like family planning and pregnancy when personalizing treatments.

Thats why safety comes into it, Giovannoni said. We always worry about the serious adverse event when we are customizing treatment strategies for patients with multiple sclerosis.

At baseline, the provider needs to look for ways to de-risk the high-efficacy DMTs to make them more palatable for patients to try as a first-line therapy.

Understanding the individuals disease is crucial, including profiling the patient in terms of understanding their risk aversion, adherence, comorbidities, and other factors before customizing treatment However, once that is done, it must be layered onto the health system and economic factors, he pointed out.

So, there is not a simple solution to the customized medicine in relation to our disease-modifying therapy, Giovannoni said.

Subgroup analyses to understand response rates

Predicting a better response to treatments is very important in MS now that there are multiple treatment options to choose from, said Maria Pia Sormani, professor of biostatistics at the University of Genoa, Italy.

However, it is not easy to define response to treatment in MS. For instance, in solid tumors, a reduction in the tumor mass after chemotherapy is defined as a response to treatment because there is no spontaneous mass reduction without treatment. In relapsing-remitting MS, simply having no relapses after an immunomodulatory drug cannot be defined as having a response to treatment, because in the disease, patients can have stable disease course even without treatment.

A subgroup analysis can help better understand patients who are responders to therapy, she explained. One study of cladribine tablets showed that while the overall risk reduction versus placebo was 50%, there were differences in response depending on disease activity.4 In patients with high disease activity, the probability of disease progression was reduced by more than 80% among patients who took cladribine; the reduction was less than 20% in patients without high disease activity.

Sometimes, when many subgroups are tested, researchers will find by chance that some subgroups have a higher response to treatment, but that finding might not be confirmed in a follow-up study, Sormani noted.

Another analysis showed that in the DEFINE study,5 patients with no prior MS treatment had a relapse risk reduction of 67% when treated with oral BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate), but in the CONFIRM study,6 the opposite was true: the reduction was only 36% in patients with no MS treatment, and the risk reduction was larger in patients who had previous treatment (54%).

A new approach that Sormani and her colleagues crafted would create a personalized profile of patients who respond better using a patient-specific continuous score.7 They applied the analysis to 3 trials: ALLEGRO was used to define the score; BRAVO was used to test the score; and CONCERTO was used to externally validate the findings.

The score was able to define responders and nonresponders, and Sormani provided an example of how it might be applied in clinical practice. First instance, take a patient with MS with 1 relapse in the previous year, 1 gadolinium-enhancing lesion on the baseline scan, and a normalized brain volume of 1600 cm3:

In conclusion, Sormani noted that there are now statistical techniques based on post-hoc analyses of clinical trials that can help identify which patients will benefit the most from which treatments in order to choose the best MS therapy for them.

We must try to push on pharmaceutical companies to allow re-analysis of their clinical trials to identify subgroup responders to every drug, she said.

References

1. Capra R, Cordioli C, Rasia S, Gallo F, Signori A, Sormani MP. Assessing long-term prognosis improvement as a consequence of treatment pattern changes in MS. Mult Scler. 2017;23(13):1757-1761. doi:10.1177/1352458516687402

2. Brown JWL, Coles A, Horakova D, et al. Association of initial disease-modifying therapy with later conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. JAMA. 2019;321(2):175-187. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.20588

3. He A, Merkel B, Brown JWL, et al. Timing of high-efficacy therapy for multiple sclerosis: a retrospective observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(4):307-316. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30067-3

4. Giovannoni G, Soelberg Sorensen P, Cook S, et al. Efficacy of cladribine tablets in high disease activity subgroups of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: a post hoc analysis of the CLARITY study. Mult Scler. 2019;25(6):819-827. doi:10.1177/1352458518771875

5. Bar-Or A, Gold R, Kappos L, et al. Clinical efficacy of BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses of the DEFINE study. J Neurol. 2013;260(9):2297-305. doi:10.1007/s00415-013-6954-7

6. Hutchinson M, Fox RJ, Miller DH, et al. Clinical efficacy of BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses of the CONFIRM study. J Neurol. 2013;260(9):2286-96. doi:10.1007/s00415-013-6968-1

7. Pellegrini F, Copetti M, Bovis F, et al. A proof-of-concept application of a novel scoring approach for personalized medicine in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2020;26(9):1064-1073. doi:10.1177/1352458519849513

More:
Choosing the Right MS Treatment by Customizing Therapy to the Individual - AJMC.com Managed Markets Network

NEW YORK, Sept. 14, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --PulsePoint, the leading technology company using real-time data to accelerate health outcomes, is set to host their second bi-annual Digital Health Forum in October. Themed "The Future was Today," the event is designed around discussions aiming to disentangle many of the challenges within healthcare and rewrite an ideal vision that capitalizes on the opportunities technology and health data present.

PulsePoint prides itself in being a forward moving company, a sentiment captured in its corporate tagline, 'Leading Health Forward'. With this event, the company is leaning into the change we're currently going through and enlisting other forward-oriented minds to collectively re-envision how we use data and technology to help people make better health decisions.

Many big minds are trying to work through the current business challenges created by the pandemic. PulsePoint wants to look beyond, to address key issues facing healthcare, specifically around what health data will look like in five years, how rules are being re-written and what new behaviors are being formed. While no one can see that far ahead, PulsePoint is crafting the event to stimulate an exchange of ideas and creative thinking, with the ultimate goal of making us all more purposeful in charting a smart, productive and compassionate way forward.

The forum will feature an eclectic mix of multidisciplinary speakers including doctors, health policy officials, futurists, disruptors, technologists, journalists, non-profits, media personalities, and even teens representing the voices of tomorrow. Key headliners include Dr. Scott Gottlieb, former commissioner of the FDA, Bob Garfield, co-host of On the Media and Dr. Amy Zalman, CEO of Prescient and Professor of Foresight at Georgetown University.

PulsePoint's last Digital Health Forum, at Lincoln Center in 2018, focused on 'Radical Health Personalization' and explored topics such as consumer privacy, health data security, personalized medicine and humanitarianism in digital health.

"PulsePoint's Digital Health Forum is a foundational event for the health industry as data and technology intercepts with the huge transformational shift we are seeing in the market. The year 2020 will be viewed as a point in time when the health industry fundamentally embraced digital technology and finally turned their backs on the analog world that has slowed down its progress for so many years," said PulsePoint CEO, Sloan Gaon. "We're bringing experts together from different parts of health, technology and media to dig into what's new, what's next and what's actionable."

The event will be held virtually on October 6th. Register at TheFutureWasToday.com

About PulsePoint

We are a technology company using real time data to transform healthcare. Through machine learning and programmatic automation, we interpret the hard-to-read signals of the health journey to understand the connection points between relevance and engagement. We do this by unifying real-time Digital Determinants of Health, offline and clinical data to create a unique and precise view of health audiences that refines, improves and increases its view over time. Visit http://www.pulsepoint.com for more about the company's technology and award winning culture.

Contact: Maria Simeone [emailprotected]

SOURCE PulsePoint

See the article here:
PulsePoint's Digital Health Forum 'The Future was Today' to Explore the Rapid Transformational Change Occurring Within Healthcare - PRNewswire

Robots welding at the assembly line of the French car maker Peugeot/Citroen in Brazil. Artificial intelligence offers a chance for the Latin America's economies to leapfrog to greater innovation and economic progress.

Photo: Antonio Scorza/AFP/ Getty Images

Share this article

E-commerce firms have faced a conundrum in Latin America: How can they deliver packages in a region where 25% of urban populations live in informal, squatterneighborhoods with no addresses?

Enter Chazki, a logistics startup from Peru, which partnered with Arequipas Universidad San Pablo to build an artificial intelligence robot to generate new postal maps across the country. The company has now expanded to Argentina, Mexico and Chile, introducing remote communities and city outskirts to online deliveries.

Thats just one example of how machine learning is bringing unique Latin American solutions to unique Latin American challenges. Artificial intelligence and its correlated technologies could prove a major boon to the regions public and private sectors. In turn, its policymakers and business leaders have to better prepare to take full advantage while warding off potential downsides.

Latin America has long been the victim of low productivity and the COVID-19 pandemic is predictably making matters worse. Now, artificial intelligence is a chance for the regions economies to leapfrog to greater innovation and economic progress. Research suggests that AI will add a full percentage point of GDP to five of South Americas biggest economies Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Peru by 2035.

Artificial intelligence could play transformative roles in Latin America for just about every sector, according to the Inter-American Development Bank (IADB). That means using AI to predict trade negotiation outcomes, commodity prices and consumer trends, or developing algorithms for use in factories, personalized medicine, infrastructure prototyping, autonomous transportation and energy consumption.

AIs applications in Latin America are already becoming reality. Argentinian Banco Galicia, Colombian airline Avianca, and Brazilian online shopping platform Shop Fcil have all adopted chatbots as virtual customer service assistance to help people. Chiles The Not Company developed an algorithm that analyzes animal-based food products and a database of 400,000 plants to generate recipes for vegan alternatives, and Perus National University of Engineering built machines to autonomously detect dangerous gases.

Expect the trend to continue in the near future. An MIT global survey of senior business executives worldwide found that, by the end of 2019, 79% of companies in Latin America had launched AI programs. The results have been positive; fewer than 2% of respondents reported that the initiatives made lower-than expected returns.

Another key factor is public acceptance of AI and automation. Thus far, Latin Americans are ahead of the curve in embracing the future, with another recent poll showing that 83% of Brazilian consumers said they would trust banking advice entirely generated by a computer, compared to a global average of 71%.

In a region that suffers from endemic corruption, pervasive violence, weak institutions and challenging socioeconomic conditions, governments, policymakers and organizations can use AI to tackle critical issues in the region, including food security, smart cities, natural resources and unemployment.

In Argentina, for example, artificial intelligence is being used to predict and prepare for teenage pregnancy and school dropout, as well as to outline unseen business opportunities in city neighborhoods. In Colombia and Uruguay, software has been developed to predict where crimes are likely to occur. In Brazil, the University of So Paulo is developing machine-learning technology that will rapidly assess the likelihood that patients have dengue fever, Zika or chikungunya when they arrive at a medical center.

At a time when public support for democracy in Latin America is flailing, AI could help come to the rescue. Congressional bodies across the region could use AI to boost the transparency and input of the legislative process. Indeed, the Hacker Laboratory, an innovation lab within Brazils Chamber of Deputies, is using AI platforms to facilitate interactions between lawmakers and citizens.

AI is not risk-free, of course. Elon Musk called AI humanitys biggest existential threat, and Stephen Hawking said it could spell the end of the human race.

Apocalyptic scenarios aside, the immediate danger of AI in Latin America is unemployment and inequality. The Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) warned in a 2018 study that between 36% and 43% of jobs could be lost due to artificial intelligence as a result of automatization. Indeed, Latin Americas governments must be prepared to set up guardrails and implement best practices for the implementation of AI.

Several governments in the region have already announced AI public policy plans. Mexico was one of the first 10 countries in the world to create a national AI strategy. Meanwhile, Brazil launched anational Internet of Things plan, which includes the countrys commitment to a network of AI laboratories across strategic areas including cybersecurity and defense. Chile is coordinating with civil society groups and experts to adopt its own AI plan.

Move aside, Mercosur! Governments in Latin America might also find that machine learning strengthens regional ties. That means harnessing AI to crunch data on trade flows and rules, find areas of consensus in multilateral negotiations, or create algorithms for regional trade. After all, AI models have a 300% greater predictive capacity than traditional econometric models, according to the Inter-American Development Bank.

Beyond competing national plans for AI, Latin American leaders should be drafting a strategy that is specific to its region much like the European Union is doing. A key takeaway from the recent UNESCO Regional Forum on AI in Latin America and the Caribbean was that the technology must develop with respect to universally recognized human rights and values.

In 2021, artificial intelligence could generate almost $3 trillion in business value and 6.2 billion hours of productivity worldwide. Latin America is rightfully jumping onto the bandwagon and has the potential to lead the parade in some areas.

To make full use of what could be a transformational productivity revolution for the region, government and business leaders must pump more resources into technology planning and education. The implementation of AI must improve, not accelerate, the regions inequity.

Read more:
Latin America's Growing Artificial Intelligence Wave BRINK News and Insights on Global Risk - BRINK

SAN FRANCISCO, Sept. 14, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- The global artificial intelligence in drug discovery marketsize is expected to reach USD 3.5 billion by 2027, expanding at a CAGR of 28.8%, according to a new report by Grand View Research, Inc. The growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) platforms aimed at reducing the overall cost associated with drug discovery and to enhance results is expected to propel the demand for these platforms in the pharma market.

Key suggestions from the report:

Read 80 page research report with ToC on "Artificial Intelligence In Drug Discovery Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Therapeutic Area (Oncology, Cardiovascular Disease, Metabolic Diseases), By Application, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2020 - 2027'' at: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-drug-discovery-market

Based on the application, the drug optimization and repurposing segment accounted for the largest revenue share in 2019. AI platforms help in identifying alternative applications for existing medicines. This can help pharma companies diversify their portfolio of offerings and assist in producing alternative therapies through minor alterations in the pharmaceutical product. Furthermore, AI platforms also enable researchers to identify the toxic effects of the medicine on the body and thus reduce the chances of adverse effects.

In 2019, oncology application accounted for the largest share whereas, the infectious disease application segment is expected to emerge as the fastest-growing application segment over the forecast period. Artificial intelligence already plays a vital role in the early detection of cancer. Furthermore, as treatments for cancer may vary for each patient, personalized medicine has proven to be an effective alternative.

North America dominated the market with a revenue share of 59.4% in 2019 owing to the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence and the presence of a large number of market players. Asia Pacific is expected to emerge as the fastest-growing region in the market over the forecast period. The growing adoption of new technology in India and China for new drug development and a focus towards boosting pharmaceutical capacities within the countries is expected to drive the market in the region.

Grand View Research has segmented the global artificial intelligence in drug discovery market based on application, therapeutic area, and region:

List of Key Players of Artificial Intelligence In Drug Discovery Market

Find more research reports on Healthcare IT Industry, by Grand View Research:

Gain access to Grand View Compass, our BI enabled intuitive market research database of 10,000+ reports

About Grand View Research

Grand View Research, U.S.-based market research and consulting company, provides syndicated as well as customized research reports and consulting services. Registered in California and headquartered in San Francisco, the company comprises over 425 analysts and consultants, adding more than 1200 market research reports to its vast database each year. These reports offer in-depth analysis on 46 industries across 25 major countries worldwide. With the help of an interactive market intelligence platform, Grand View Research helps Fortune 500 companies and renowned academic institutes understand the global and regional business environment and gauge the opportunities that lie ahead.

Contact:Sherry JamesCorporate Sales Specialist, USAGrand View Research, Inc.Phone: +1-415-349-0058Toll Free: 1-888-202-9519Email: [emailprotected]Web: https://www.grandviewresearch.comFollow Us: LinkedIn| Twitter

SOURCE Grand View Research, Inc.

Continued here:
Artificial Intelligence In Drug Discovery Market Size Worth $3.5 Billion By 2027: Grand View Research, Inc. - PRNewswire

DGAP-News: Evotec SE / Key word(s): Miscellaneous14.09.2020 / 07:30 The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

Hamburg, Germany, 14 September, 2020: Evotec SE (Frankfurt Stock Exchange: EVT, MDAX/TecDAX, ISIN: DE0005664809) and the French-based BIOASTER Technological Research Institute ("BIOASTER") today announced that they have entered into a partnership to advance research for infectious diseases. BIOASTER is a technology and innovation hub located in Lyon, France that has created a new model to address the latest challenges in the microbiology field, including antimicrobial resistance and vaccine safety and efficacy.

The organisations have been working together since the beginning of 2020 and Evotec represents the first global research and development company to locate staff in BIOASTER's premises in Lyon.

Under the terms of the collaboration agreement, the two organisations aim to put forward new research projects against infectious diseases and antimicrobial resistance, potentially creating new therapies and technologies. This collaboration had already started through the European research projects and development consortium ERA4TB (European Regimen Accelerator for Tuberculosis) and GNA NOW (Novel Gram-negative antibiotic now) within the AMR accelerator supported by the Innovative Medicines Initiative IMI2, aimed at reducing resistance to antibiotics and developing new therapeutic solutions.

"BIOASTER is proud to have support from the French and European leaders in diagnostics, vaccines, and animal health, and is pleased to formalise such a partnership with Evotec at the Lyon site. This allows BIOASTER to strengthen its agility and its capacity for technological innovation, in particular on antimicrobial resistance. BIOASTER now has a high-value network of close partners, which covers our four fields of application: antimicrobials, diagnostics, vaccines and microbiota understanding are key for manufacturers and patients alike," said Dr Philippe Archinard, President of IRT BIOASTER.

"The agreement will nurture the research ecosystem of Lyon Metropole and its Biodistrict, and impact on both national and European levels. The fact that Evotec, a company headquartered in Hamburg, Germany, chose to locate its unit dedicated to infectious diseases together with BIOASTER in the Biodistrict Lyon, reinforces the reputation of this French health ecosystem, while offering a more complete and more powerful technological toolbox to speed up industrialisation of innovations," said Emeline Baume, first vice president of Lyon Metropole.

"We are very glad to be partnering with BIOASTER, bringing Evotec's proven global resources for anti-infective research and drug development to Lyon," said Dr Werner Lanthaler, Chief Executive Officer of Evotec. "Both Evotec and BIOASTER have made a long-term commitment to tackle the challenge of antimicrobial resistance and we are confident that together we will be able to efficiently drive forward the progress in this field with high and rising unmet medical need."

The two entities gather more than 120 researchers in total, share the same advanced infrastructures, including five BSL3 laboratories, with easy access to diverse equipments: this co-location creates a new pole of attraction, particularly suited to the expectations of industrials to accelerate and de-risk their product developments in infectious diseases.

ABOUT BIOASTER TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTECreated in 2012, following the French initiative of Technological Research Institutes, BIOASTER is a non-for-profit foundation developing a unique technological and innovative model to support the latest challenges in microbiology. In particular, BIOASTER uses and develops high value technological innovations that accelerate development of medical solutions for populations and personalized medicine.The aim of BIOASTER is to bring together academic, industry and its capacities and specific knowledge to develop and execute high impact collaborative projects requiring industry compatible innovative technologies.Key figures:* 4 fields of expertise: antimicrobials, diagnostics, microbiota, vaccines* BSL2 & BSL3 laboratories in Lyon and Paris* 100+ employees, including 80% of scientific experts, 17 nationalities* 66+ collaborative projects, involving 27 private partners, 29 public partners.www.bioaster.org

ABOUT EVOTEC SEEvotec is a drug discovery alliance and development partnership company focused on rapidly progressing innovative product approaches with leading pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academics, patient advocacy groups and venture capitalists. We operate worldwide and our more than 3,300 employees provide the highest quality stand-alone and integrated drug discovery and development solutions. We cover all activities from target-to-clinic to meet the industry's need for innovation and efficiency in drug discovery and development (EVT Execute). The Company has established a unique position by assembling top-class scientific experts and integrating state-of-the-art technologies as well as substantial experience and expertise in key therapeutic areas including neuronal diseases, diabetes and complications of diabetes, pain and inflammation, oncology, infectious diseases, respiratory diseases, fibrosis, rare diseases and women's health. On this basis, Evotec has built a broad and deep pipeline of approx. 100 co-owned product opportunities at clinical, pre-clinical and discovery stages (EVT Innovate). Evotec has established multiple long-term alliances with partners including Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CHDI, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB and others. For additional information please go to http://www.evotec.com and follow us on Twitter @Evotec.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSInformation set forth in this press release contains forward-looking statements, which involve a number of risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements contained herein represent the judgement of Evotec as of the date of this press release. Such forward-looking statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, and which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in these forward-looking statements. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any such statements to reflect any change in our expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

14.09.2020 Dissemination of a Corporate News, transmitted by DGAP - a service of EQS Group AG.The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

The DGAP Distribution Services include Regulatory Announcements, Financial/Corporate News and Press Releases. Archive at http://www.dgap.de

Read more here:
EVOTEC AND BIOASTER PARTNER TO BUILD A TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION HUB IN LYON - PharmiWeb.com

Debut Bio

SAN DIEGO (PRWEB) September 15, 2020

Debut Biotechnology, a UC-Irvine spinout advancing scalable cell-free biomanufacturing, today announced that it has been awarded $1M from the Air Force Research Labs Biotechnology Grand Challenge. Debut Bio is the inaugural recipient of the award, which honors the companys proposal on biosynthesis of monomers for aerospace applications.

In the proposal, Debut Bio details its ability to leverage the companys scalable biomanufacturing platform for bio- and metal-free synthesis of polymer precursors relevant for the aerospace industry. Debut Bios platform will provide AFRL with the ability to effectively and efficiently biomanufacture specialty ingredients needed for aerospace applications. In doing so, Debut Bio expects to reduce aerospace material costs and improve vehicle maintenance processes by extending service lifetimes.

The Air Force Research Lab has a well-documented history in discovering and leveraging breakthrough technologies. By offering a cell-free, continuous biomanufacturing process, we are excited to continue that legacy of innovation through our work with them, said Dr. Joshua Britton, CEO and Founder of Debut Biotechnology. Cell-free biomanufacturing enables the quality manufacturing of high-value molecules at a price point that scales far beyond what is possible today. In bringing this approach to the AFRL, we hope to usher in a new era of biomanufacturing for high-value molecules that is scalable, economically viable, and results in solutions that are efficient and effective.

Debut Bio has applied its technology to the pharmaceutical and specialty ingredient industries, allowing customers to manufacture high-value molecules by combining custom-designed immobilized enzymes with continuous biomanufacturing processes. Through the utilization of plug-and-play enzyme cartridges, the companys cell-free platform has the ability to transform low-value bio-renewable materials into high-value specialty chemicals.

The Debut Biotechnology proposal provides a path to a scalable, bio- and metal free synthesis of key aerospace polymer precursors, explained Dr. Davide Simone, AFRLs technology advisor for biosynthesis of monomers for aerospace thermosets and senior research chemist. Expected benefits for the Air Force include a significant savings in composite aerospace structural material costs and the elimination of oxidation promoting metal catalysts from structural components, extending service lifetimes.

Debut Bios enzyme cartridges are sequentially arranged in a manner which mimics pathways found in plants and other organisms. Each cartridge is finely-tuned to provide the ideal temperature, pH, concentration, solvent, and reaction time for each individual step to maximize enzymatic productivity and product titer levels. The platform requires far fewer steps than traditional materials manufacturing and avoids the use of environmentally harmful chemical synthesis. Importantly, it overcomes many challenges typically associated with relying on cells for biomanufacturing or extraction of ingredients from plants and other sources.

In Debut Bios system, materials are passed from one enzyme reactor to another to build in-vitro or cell-free biosynthetic pathways. The companys platform uses a sustainable approach by leveraging advanced enzymes outside of the cell to maximize performance and avoid issues with cell-based fermentation systems. The platform technology operates under a continuous manufacturing regime, allowing Debut Bio to scale beyond the capabilities of other manufacturing processes currently on the market, which are constrained by the precipitation of enzymes, the need for multiple large reactors, and the specific requirements of enzymes. By leveraging continuous manufacturing, Debut Bio is able to drive down the cost of cell-free manufacturing to provide scale, consistency, novelty, and ultimately the ability to produce a biomolecule with the click of a button.

Debut Bio serves organizations across the defense and specialty ingredient industries, with commitments from several large scale manufacturers to integrate its platform into their existing pipelines.

To learn more, please visit: https://debutbiotech.com.

About Debut Biotechnology

Debut Biotechnology is commercializing cell-free biomanufacturing solutions by creating advanced enzyme-based manufacturing processes for high-value molecules. Our platform combines immobilized enzymes with highly controlled and automated continuous manufacturing systems for the pharmaceutical and specialty chemical industries.

Debut Biotechnology was founded by Joshua Britton, Greg Weiss, and Brady Beauchamp and is based in sunny San Diego. To learn more, please visit: https://debutbiotech.com/.

Share article on social media or email:

Continued here:
Debut Biotechnology Awarded $1M from Air Force Research Lab to Leverage Cell-Free Continuous Biomanufacturing in Aerospace Applications - PR Web

Nantkwest Inc (NK) is around the top of the Biotechnology industry according to InvestorsObserver. NK received an overall rating of 62, which means that it scores higher than 62 percent of all stocks. Nantkwest Inc also achieved a score of 79 in the Biotechnology industry, putting it above 79 percent of Biotechnology stocks. Biotechnology is ranked 31 out of the 148 industries.

Analyzing stocks can be hard. There are tons of numbers and ratios, and it can be hard to remember what they all mean and what counts as good for a given value. InvestorsObserver ranks stocks on eight different metrics. We percentile rank most of our scores to make it easy for investors to understand. A score of 62 means the stock is more attractive than 62 percent of stocks.

Our proprietary scoring system captures technical factors, fundamental analysis and the opinions of analysts on Wall Street. This makes InvestorsObservers overall rating a great way to get started, regardless of your investing style. Percentile-ranked scores are also easy to understand. A score of 100 is the top and a 0 is the bottom. Theres no need to try to remember what is good for a bunch of complicated ratios, just pay attention to which numbers are the highest.

Nantkwest Inc (NK) stock is trading at $7.94 as of 1:12 PM on Monday, Sep 14, a gain of $1.34, or 20.3% from the previous closing price of $6.60. The stock has traded between $6.84 and $7.97 so far today. Volume today is above average. So far 1,740,191 shares have traded compared to average volume of 1,370,495 shares.

Click Here to get the full Stock Score Report on Nantkwest Inc (NK) Stock.

Read the original post:
Where Does Nantkwest Inc (NK) Stock Fall in the Biotechnology Field? - InvestorsObserver

Evelo Biosciences Inc (EVLO) is around the middle of the Biotechnology industry according to InvestorsObserver. EVLO received an overall rating of 44, which means that it scores higher than 44 percent of all stocks. Evelo Biosciences Inc also achieved a score of 45 in the Biotechnology industry, putting it above 45 percent of Biotechnology stocks. Biotechnology is ranked 31 out of the 148 industries.

Finding the best stocks can be tricky. It isnt easy to compare companies across industries. Even companies that have relatively similar businesses can be tricky to compare sometimes. InvestorsObservers tools allow a top-down approach that lets you pick a metric, find the top sector and industry and then find the top stocks in that sector.

Our proprietary scoring system captures technical factors, fundamental analysis and the opinions of analysts on Wall Street. This makes InvestorsObservers overall rating a great way to get started, regardless of your investing style. Percentile-ranked scores are also easy to understand. A score of 100 is the top and a 0 is the bottom. Theres no need to try to remember what is good for a bunch of complicated ratios, just pay attention to which numbers are the highest.

Evelo Biosciences Inc (EVLO) stock is trading at $5.08 as of 2:35 PM on Monday, Sep 14, a rise of $0.39, or 8.32% from the previous closing price of $4.69. The stock has traded between $4.81 and $5.22 so far today. Volume today is less active than usual. So far 65,585 shares have traded compared to average volume of 145,817 shares.

Click Here to get the full Stock Score Report on Evelo Biosciences Inc (EVLO) Stock.

Originally posted here:
Is Evelo Biosciences Inc (EVLO) Stock Near the Top of the Biotechnology Industry? - InvestorsObserver

The 70 rating InvestorsObserver gives to Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO) stock puts it near the top of the Biotechnology industry. In addition to scoring higher than 90 percent of stocks in the Biotechnology industry, CDMOs 70 overall rating means the stock scores better than 70 percent of all stocks.

Searching for the best stocks to invest in can be difficult. There are thousands of options and it can be confusing on what actually constitutes a great value. Investors Observer allows you to choose from eight unique metrics to view the top industries and the best performing stocks in that industry. A score of 70 would rank higher than 70 percent of all stocks.

These scores are not only easy to understand, but it is easy to compare stocks to each other. You can find the best stock in an industry, or look for the sector that has the highest average score. The overall score is a combination of technical and fundamental factors that serves as a good starting point when analyzing a stock. Traders and investors with different goals may have different goals and will want to consider other factors than just the headline number before making any investment decisions.

Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO) stock is trading at $7.69 as of 10:59 AM on Monday, Sep 14, a gain of $0.51, or 7.03% from the previous closing price of $7.18. The stock has traded between $7.27 and $7.78 so far today. Volume today is 347,046 compared to average volume of 413,400.

Click Here to get the full Stock Score Report on Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO) Stock.

Here is the original post:
Where Does Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO) Stock Fall in the Biotechnology Field? - InvestorsObserver

Kolkata, Sep 14 (UNI) GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GSK Pharmaceutical Ltd.) in collaboration with the Regional Centre for Biotechnology (RCB) has completed the first year of its Trust in Science Program and is marking it by hosting a six part Trust in Science webinar series. The first webinar was held today. Like the program, these webinars are also an academia-industry collaboration in which experts from the private sector and scientific community will provide insights on trends in bioinformatics and biostatistics and the future outlook of this valuable skill set. The Trust in Science program offers full PhD courses in Biostatistics and Bioinformatics to equip Indian students for a career in a data and AI-driven pharma research ecosystem.

Commenting on the progress of the program, Prof. Sudhanshu Vrati, Executive Director, Regional Centre for Biotechnology, said, Biostatistics and bioinformatics are rapidly emerging fields in biology and are set to change the way we approach scientific R&D. In the first year of this program, we got a good response from aspiring PhD candidates eager to explore scientific careers in these fields. Now, through our webinar series, we hope to reach out to even more Indian students and faculty to make them aware of the potential that lies in these fields and to realize the value of the Trust in Science PhD program.

In the keynote address, HE Jan Thompson, Acting British High Commissioner to India, said the Trust in Science initiative is a great example of public-private-partnership. She added, It is my hope that the Trust in Science initiative will give young researchers an opportunity to explore high-end expertise in drug discovery and the program becomes a spring-board for them to transition into a full-fledged pharma career in the future. The UK and Indian governments continue to work together in healthcare, exploring opportunities for some of the best UK companies to offer their products and services for improved healthcare delivery in India.

Dr. Renu Swarup, Secretary, Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, said, It is great to see that this RCB-GSK collaboration is more than a research budget collaboration between academia and industry, but one that looks to create a human resource foundation for new technology. I would like to see this partnership scaled up, with more partners included so that it becomes a national network for the country. I believe this webinar series can reach out to more people and draw in more institutes to see the value of this partnership..

Mr. Sridhar Venkatesh, Managing Director, GSK Pharmaceuticals Limited (India) said, The ongoing pandemic has highlighted the value of biostatistics and bioinformatics tools and methodologies to significantly reduce the time taken for a medicine to be brought from lab to market. This is the future of pharmaceuticals research and we believe that the Trust in Science programme is contributing to prepare a workforce that is future ready. We hope the webinar series will help aspiring PhD students to get a primer on the likely future of pharma research.

The launch webinar concluded with a learning session by Prof Partha Mazumdar, distinguished Professor, National Institute of Biomedical Genomics, who said, A confluence of statistical science and data science is the enabler of rapid and robust inferences in biology and medicine. He also spoke of the critical value of biostatistics and bioinformatics during the ongoing pandemic by referring to the study on the diversity and evolution of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 through the analysis of RNA sequences collected from 3636 infected patients across 55 countries. This is an exciting time in modern biology and medicine, he added, referring to the coming together of statics and big data analysis.

GSK Pharmaceutical Ltd.s Trust in Science initiative is a novel public-private partnership model to build R&D capacity for development and discovery in science. The pillars of this initiative are: scientific excellence, trust and talent development in line with GSKs Science, Technology and Culture values. The initiative was launched in 2011 initially to engage with leading researchers and institutions in Latin America, focused on Brazil and Argentina. GSK Pharmaceutical Ltd. is pleased to expand this initiative beyond Latin America to other emerging markets such as India.UNI SJC AND

Original post:
GSK Pharmaceuticals (India) in collaboration with Regional Centre for Biotechnology completes one year of 'Trust in Science' academia-industry...

A rating of 77 puts ChemoCentryx Inc (CCXI) near the top of the Biotechnology industry according to InvestorsObserver. ChemoCentryx Inc's score of 77 means it scores higher than 77% of stocks in the industry. ChemoCentryx Inc also received an overall rating of 60, putting it above 60% of all stocks. Biotechnology is ranked 31 out of the 148 industries.

Searching for the best stocks to invest in can be difficult. There are thousands of options and it can be confusing on what actually constitutes a great value. Investors Observer allows you to choose from eight unique metrics to view the top industries and the best performing stocks in that industry. A score of 60 would rank higher than 60 percent of all stocks.

These rankings allows you to easily compare stocks and view what the strengths and weaknesses are of a given company. This lets you find the stocks with the best short and long term growth prospects in a matter of seconds. The combined score incorporates technical and fundamental analysis in order to give a comprehensive overview of a stocks performance. Investors who then want to focus on analysts rankings or valuations are able to see the separate scores for each section.

ChemoCentryx Inc (CCXI) stock is trading at $53.41 as of 2:38 PM on Monday, Sep 14, an increase of $5.34, or 11.11% from the previous closing price of $48.07. The stock has traded between $48.54 and $53.69 so far today. Volume today is light. So far 346,181 shares have traded compared to average volume of 475,545 shares.

Click Here to get the full Stock Score Report on ChemoCentryx Inc (CCXI) Stock.

Read the original post:
Is ChemoCentryx Inc (CCXI) The Right Choice in Biotechnology? - InvestorsObserver

Denali Therapeutics Inc (DNLI) is near the top in its industry group according to InvestorsObserver. DNLI gets an overall rating of 65. That means it scores higher than 65 percent of stocks. Denali Therapeutics Inc gets a 84 rank in the Biotechnology industry. Biotechnology is number 31 out of 148 industries.

Analyzing stocks can be hard. There are tons of numbers and ratios, and it can be hard to remember what they all mean and what counts as good for a given value. InvestorsObserver ranks stocks on eight different metrics. We percentile rank most of our scores to make it easy for investors to understand. A score of 65 means the stock is more attractive than 65 percent of stocks.

Our proprietary scoring system captures technical factors, fundamental analysis and the opinions of analysts on Wall Street. This makes InvestorsObservers overall rating a great way to get started, regardless of your investing style. Percentile-ranked scores are also easy to understand. A score of 100 is the top and a 0 is the bottom. Theres no need to try to remember what is good for a bunch of complicated ratios, just pay attention to which numbers are the highest.

Denali Therapeutics Inc (DNLI) stock is trading at $36.01 as of 3:36 PM on Monday, Sep 14, a rise of $4.02, or 12.57% from the previous closing price of $31.99. The stock has traded between $31.75 and $36.12 so far today. Volume today is high. So far 1,773,161 shares have traded compared to average volume of 842,601 shares.

Click Here to get the full Stock Score Report on Denali Therapeutics Inc (DNLI) Stock.

Link:
Is Denali Therapeutics Inc (DNLI) a Winner in the Biotechnology Industry? - InvestorsObserver

The 63 rating InvestorsObserver gives to Turning Point Therapeutics Inc (TPTX) stock puts it near the top of the Biotechnology industry. In addition to scoring higher than 81 percent of stocks in the Biotechnology industry, TPTXs 63 overall rating means the stock scores better than 63 percent of all stocks.

Finding the best stocks can be tricky. It isnt easy to compare companies across industries. Even companies that have relatively similar businesses can be tricky to compare sometimes. InvestorsObservers tools allow a top-down approach that lets you pick a metric, find the top sector and industry and then find the top stocks in that sector.

These scores are not only easy to understand, but it is easy to compare stocks to each other. You can find the best stock in an industry, or look for the sector that has the highest average score. The overall score is a combination of technical and fundamental factors that serves as a good starting point when analyzing a stock. Traders and investors with different goals may have different goals and will want to consider other factors than just the headline number before making any investment decisions.

Turning Point Therapeutics Inc (TPTX) stock is trading at $80.68 as of 2:39 PM on Monday, Sep 14, an increase of $9.58, or 13.47% from the previous closing price of $71.10. The stock has traded between $72.52 and $80.68 so far today. Volume today is 269,852 compared to average volume of 295,953.

Click Here to get the full Stock Score Report on Turning Point Therapeutics Inc (TPTX) Stock.

Read more from the original source:
Is Turning Point Therapeutics Inc (TPTX) a Winner in the Biotechnology Industry? - InvestorsObserver

The 47 rating InvestorsObserver gives to Cara Therapeutics Inc (CARA) stock puts it near the middle of the Biotechnology industry. In addition to scoring higher than 50 percent of stocks in the Biotechnology industry, CARAs 47 overall rating means the stock scores better than 47 percent of all stocks.

Finding the best stocks can be tricky. It isnt easy to compare companies across industries. Even companies that have relatively similar businesses can be tricky to compare sometimes. InvestorsObservers tools allow a top-down approach that lets you pick a metric, find the top sector and industry and then find the top stocks in that sector.

This ranking system incorporates numerous factors used by analysts to compare stocks in greater detail. This allows you to find the best stocks available in any industry with relative ease. These percentile-ranked scores using both fundamental and technical analysis give investors an easy way to view the attractiveness of specific stocks. Stocks with the highest scores have the best evaluations by analysts working on Wall Street.

Cara Therapeutics Inc (CARA) stock is trading at $15.48 as of 1:09 PM on Monday, Sep 14, an increase of $0.57, or 3.82% from the previous closing price of $14.91. The stock has traded between $14.96 and $15.48 so far today. Volume today is 308,112 compared to average volume of 341,120.

Click Here to get the full Stock Score Report on Cara Therapeutics Inc (CARA) Stock.

View post:
Is Cara Therapeutics Inc (CARA) Stock Near the Top of the Biotechnology Industry? - InvestorsObserver

The 51 rating InvestorsObserver gives to AIM ImmunoTech Inc (AIM) stock puts it near the middle of the Biotechnology industry. In addition to scoring higher than 57 percent of stocks in the Biotechnology industry, AIMs 51 overall rating means the stock scores better than 51 percent of all stocks.

Searching for the best stocks to invest in can be difficult. There are thousands of options and it can be confusing on what actually constitutes a great value. Investors Observer allows you to choose from eight unique metrics to view the top industries and the best performing stocks in that industry. A score of 51 would rank higher than 51 percent of all stocks.

These rankings allows you to easily compare stocks and view what the strengths and weaknesses are of a given company. This lets you find the stocks with the best short and long term growth prospects in a matter of seconds. The combined score incorporates technical and fundamental analysis in order to give a comprehensive overview of a stocks performance. Investors who then want to focus on analysts rankings or valuations are able to see the separate scores for each section.

AIM ImmunoTech Inc (AIM) stock is trading at $1.80 as of 10:03 AM on Monday, Sep 14, a gain of $0.03, or 1.69% from the previous closing price of $1.77. The stock has traded between $1.78 and $1.84 so far today. Volume today is less active than usual. So far 108,630 shares have traded compared to average volume of 3,605,488 shares.

Click Here to get the full Stock Score Report on AIM ImmunoTech Inc (AIM) Stock.

See the article here:
Is AIM ImmunoTech Inc (AIM) The Right Choice in Biotechnology? - InvestorsObserver

A rating of 28 puts Clovis Oncology Inc (CLVS) near the bottom of the Biotechnology industry according to InvestorsObserver. Clovis Oncology Inc's score of 28 means it scores higher than 28% of stocks in the industry. Clovis Oncology Inc also received an overall rating of 36, putting it above 36% of all stocks. Biotechnology is ranked 31 out of the 148 industries.

Finding the best stocks can be tricky. It isnt easy to compare companies across industries. Even companies that have relatively similar businesses can be tricky to compare sometimes. InvestorsObservers tools allow a top-down approach that lets you pick a metric, find the top sector and industry and then find the top stocks in that sector.

This ranking system incorporates numerous factors used by analysts to compare stocks in greater detail. This allows you to find the best stocks available in any industry with relative ease. These percentile-ranked scores using both fundamental and technical analysis give investors an easy way to view the attractiveness of specific stocks. Stocks with the highest scores have the best evaluations by analysts working on Wall Street.

Clovis Oncology Inc (CLVS) stock is trading at $6.68 as of 10:47 AM on Monday, Sep 14, a rise of $0.64, or 10.52% from the previous closing price of $6.04. The stock has traded between $6.26 and $6.85 so far today. Volume today is below average. So far 3,761,442 shares have traded compared to average volume of 5,153,337 shares.

Click Here to get the full Stock Score Report on Clovis Oncology Inc (CLVS) Stock.

Read this article:
Should You Buy Clovis Oncology Inc (CLVS) in Biotechnology Industry? - InvestorsObserver

Axsome Therapeutics Inc (AXSM) is near the top in its industry group according to InvestorsObserver. AXSM gets an overall rating of 62. That means it scores higher than 62 percent of stocks. Axsome Therapeutics Inc gets a 80 rank in the Biotechnology industry. Biotechnology is number 31 out of 148 industries.

Trying to find the best stocks can be a daunting task. There are a wide variety of ways to analyze stocks in order to determine which ones are performing the strongest. Investors Observer makes the entire process easier by using percentile rankings that allows you to easily find the stocks who have the strongest evaluations by analysts.

These scores are not only easy to understand, but it is easy to compare stocks to each other. You can find the best stock in an industry, or look for the sector that has the highest average score. The overall score is a combination of technical and fundamental factors that serves as a good starting point when analyzing a stock. Traders and investors with different goals may have different goals and will want to consider other factors than just the headline number before making any investment decisions.

Axsome Therapeutics Inc (AXSM) stock is trading at $82.28 as of 10:59 AM on Monday, Sep 14, an increase of $9.25, or 12.67% from the previous closing price of $73.03. The stock has traded between $74.40 and $82.40 so far today. Volume today is 290,235 compared to average volume of 369,883.

Click Here to get the full Stock Score Report on Axsome Therapeutics Inc (AXSM) Stock.

See the rest here:
Is Axsome Therapeutics Inc (AXSM) the Top Pick in the Biotechnology Industry? - InvestorsObserver

Global Blood Cell Analyzer Market to Reach $2. 1 Billion by 2027. Amid the COVID-19 crisis, the global market for Blood Cell Analyzer estimated at US$1. 5 Billion in the year 2020, is projected to reach a revised size of US$2.

New York, Sept. 15, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Reportlinker.com announces the release of the report "Global Blood Cell Analyzer Industry" - https://www.reportlinker.com/p05960820/?utm_source=GNW 1 Billion by 2027, growing at aCAGR of 4.8% over the period 2020-2027. Semi-automated Biochemistry Analyzers, one of the segments analyzed in the report, is projected to record 4.5% CAGR and reach US$539.5 Million by the end of the analysis period. After an early analysis of the business implications of the pandemic and its induced economic crisis, growth in the Fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzers segment is readjusted to a revised 4.9% CAGR for the next 7-year period.

The U.S. Market is Estimated at $439.7 Million, While China is Forecast to Grow at 4.5% CAGR

The Blood Cell Analyzer market in the U.S. is estimated at US$439.7 Million in the year 2020. China, the world`s second largest economy, is forecast to reach a projected market size of US$366.3 Million by the year 2027 trailing a CAGR of 4.5% over the analysis period 2020 to 2027. Among the other noteworthy geographic markets are Japan and Canada, each forecast to grow at 4.6% and 3.8% respectively over the 2020-2027 period. Within Europe, Germany is forecast to grow at approximately 4% CAGR.We bring years of research experience to this 8th edition of our report. The 277-page report presents concise insights into how the pandemic has impacted production and the buy side for 2020 and 2021. A short-term phased recovery by key geography is also addressed.

Competitors identified in this market include, among others,

Read the full report: https://www.reportlinker.com/p05960820/?utm_source=GNW

I. INTRODUCTION, METHODOLOGY & REPORT SCOPE

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. MARKET OVERVIEW Global Competitor Market Shares Blood Cell Analyzer Competitor Market Share Scenario Worldwide (in %): 2019 & 2025 Impact of Covid-19 and a Looming Global Recession

2. FOCUS ON SELECT PLAYERS

3. MARKET TRENDS & DRIVERS

4. GLOBAL MARKET PERSPECTIVE Table 1: World Current & Future Analysis for Blood Cell Analyzer by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027

Table 2: World Historic Review for Blood Cell Analyzer by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 3: World 15-Year Perspective for Blood Cell Analyzer by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 4: World Current & Future Analysis for Semi-automated Biochemistry Analyzers by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027

Table 5: World Historic Review for Semi-automated Biochemistry Analyzers by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 6: World 15-Year Perspective for Semi-automated Biochemistry Analyzers by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 7: World Current & Future Analysis for Fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzers by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027

Table 8: World Historic Review for Fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzers by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 9: World 15-Year Perspective for Fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzers by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 10: World Current & Future Analysis for Bench-top by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027

Table 11: World Historic Review for Bench-top by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 12: World 15-Year Perspective for Bench-top by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 13: World Current & Future Analysis for Floor-standing by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027

Table 14: World Historic Review for Floor-standing by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 15: World 15-Year Perspective for Floor-standing by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 16: World Current & Future Analysis for Clinical Diagnostics by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027

Table 17: World Historic Review for Clinical Diagnostics by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 18: World 15-Year Perspective for Clinical Diagnostics by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 19: World Current & Future Analysis for Drug development by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027

Table 20: World Historic Review for Drug development by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 21: World 15-Year Perspective for Drug development by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 22: World Current & Future Analysis for Other Applications by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027

Table 23: World Historic Review for Other Applications by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 24: World 15-Year Perspective for Other Applications by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 25: World Current & Future Analysis for Hospitals by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027

Table 26: World Historic Review for Hospitals by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 27: World 15-Year Perspective for Hospitals by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 28: World Current & Future Analysis for Diagnostic Centers by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027

Table 29: World Historic Review for Diagnostic Centers by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 30: World 15-Year Perspective for Diagnostic Centers by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 31: World Current & Future Analysis for Pharmaceutical Companies by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027

Table 32: World Historic Review for Pharmaceutical Companies by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 33: World 15-Year Perspective for Pharmaceutical Companies by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 34: World Current & Future Analysis for Biotechnology Companies by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027

Table 35: World Historic Review for Biotechnology Companies by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 36: World 15-Year Perspective for Biotechnology Companies by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 37: World Current & Future Analysis for Contract Research Organizations by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027

Table 38: World Historic Review for Contract Research Organizations by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 39: World 15-Year Perspective for Contract Research Organizations by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 40: World Current & Future Analysis for Academic Research Institutes by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027

Table 41: World Historic Review for Academic Research Institutes by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 42: World 15-Year Perspective for Academic Research Institutes by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

III. MARKET ANALYSIS

GEOGRAPHIC MARKET ANALYSIS

UNITED STATES Market Facts & Figures US Blood Cell Analyzer Market Share (in %) by Company: 2019 & 2025 Market Analytics Table 43: USA Current & Future Analysis for Blood Cell Analyzer by Product Type - Semi-automated Biochemistry Analyzers and Fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzers - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027

Table 44: USA Historic Review for Blood Cell Analyzer by Product Type - Semi-automated Biochemistry Analyzers and Fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzers Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 45: USA 15-Year Perspective for Blood Cell Analyzer by Product Type - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Semi-automated Biochemistry Analyzers and Fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzers for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 46: USA Current & Future Analysis for Blood Cell Analyzer by Modality - Bench-top and Floor-standing - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027

Table 47: USA Historic Review for Blood Cell Analyzer by Modality - Bench-top and Floor-standing Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 48: USA 15-Year Perspective for Blood Cell Analyzer by Modality - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Bench-top and Floor-standing for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 49: USA Current & Future Analysis for Blood Cell Analyzer by Application - Clinical Diagnostics, Drug development and Other Applications - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027

Table 50: USA Historic Review for Blood Cell Analyzer by Application - Clinical Diagnostics, Drug development and Other Applications Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 51: USA 15-Year Perspective for Blood Cell Analyzer by Application - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Clinical Diagnostics, Drug development and Other Applications for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 52: USA Current & Future Analysis for Blood Cell Analyzer by End-Use - Hospitals, Diagnostic Centers, Pharmaceutical Companies, Biotechnology Companies, Contract Research Organizations and Academic Research Institutes - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027

Table 53: USA Historic Review for Blood Cell Analyzer by End-Use - Hospitals, Diagnostic Centers, Pharmaceutical Companies, Biotechnology Companies, Contract Research Organizations and Academic Research Institutes Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 54: USA 15-Year Perspective for Blood Cell Analyzer by End-Use - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Hospitals, Diagnostic Centers, Pharmaceutical Companies, Biotechnology Companies, Contract Research Organizations and Academic Research Institutes for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

CANADA Table 55: Canada Current & Future Analysis for Blood Cell Analyzer by Product Type - Semi-automated Biochemistry Analyzers and Fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzers - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027

Table 56: Canada Historic Review for Blood Cell Analyzer by Product Type - Semi-automated Biochemistry Analyzers and Fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzers Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 57: Canada 15-Year Perspective for Blood Cell Analyzer by Product Type - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Semi-automated Biochemistry Analyzers and Fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzers for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 58: Canada Current & Future Analysis for Blood Cell Analyzer by Modality - Bench-top and Floor-standing - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027

Table 59: Canada Historic Review for Blood Cell Analyzer by Modality - Bench-top and Floor-standing Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 60: Canada 15-Year Perspective for Blood Cell Analyzer by Modality - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Bench-top and Floor-standing for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 61: Canada Current & Future Analysis for Blood Cell Analyzer by Application - Clinical Diagnostics, Drug development and Other Applications - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027

Table 62: Canada Historic Review for Blood Cell Analyzer by Application - Clinical Diagnostics, Drug development and Other Applications Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 63: Canada 15-Year Perspective for Blood Cell Analyzer by Application - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Clinical Diagnostics, Drug development and Other Applications for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 64: Canada Current & Future Analysis for Blood Cell Analyzer by End-Use - Hospitals, Diagnostic Centers, Pharmaceutical Companies, Biotechnology Companies, Contract Research Organizations and Academic Research Institutes - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027

Table 65: Canada Historic Review for Blood Cell Analyzer by End-Use - Hospitals, Diagnostic Centers, Pharmaceutical Companies, Biotechnology Companies, Contract Research Organizations and Academic Research Institutes Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 66: Canada 15-Year Perspective for Blood Cell Analyzer by End-Use - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Hospitals, Diagnostic Centers, Pharmaceutical Companies, Biotechnology Companies, Contract Research Organizations and Academic Research Institutes for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

JAPAN Table 67: Japan Current & Future Analysis for Blood Cell Analyzer by Product Type - Semi-automated Biochemistry Analyzers and Fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzers - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027

Table 68: Japan Historic Review for Blood Cell Analyzer by Product Type - Semi-automated Biochemistry Analyzers and Fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzers Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 69: Japan 15-Year Perspective for Blood Cell Analyzer by Product Type - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Semi-automated Biochemistry Analyzers and Fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzers for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 70: Japan Current & Future Analysis for Blood Cell Analyzer by Modality - Bench-top and Floor-standing - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027

Table 71: Japan Historic Review for Blood Cell Analyzer by Modality - Bench-top and Floor-standing Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 72: Japan 15-Year Perspective for Blood Cell Analyzer by Modality - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Bench-top and Floor-standing for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 73: Japan Current & Future Analysis for Blood Cell Analyzer by Application - Clinical Diagnostics, Drug development and Other Applications - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027

Table 74: Japan Historic Review for Blood Cell Analyzer by Application - Clinical Diagnostics, Drug development and Other Applications Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 75: Japan 15-Year Perspective for Blood Cell Analyzer by Application - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Clinical Diagnostics, Drug development and Other Applications for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 76: Japan Current & Future Analysis for Blood Cell Analyzer by End-Use - Hospitals, Diagnostic Centers, Pharmaceutical Companies, Biotechnology Companies, Contract Research Organizations and Academic Research Institutes - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027

Table 77: Japan Historic Review for Blood Cell Analyzer by End-Use - Hospitals, Diagnostic Centers, Pharmaceutical Companies, Biotechnology Companies, Contract Research Organizations and Academic Research Institutes Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 78: Japan 15-Year Perspective for Blood Cell Analyzer by End-Use - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Hospitals, Diagnostic Centers, Pharmaceutical Companies, Biotechnology Companies, Contract Research Organizations and Academic Research Institutes for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

CHINA Table 79: China Current & Future Analysis for Blood Cell Analyzer by Product Type - Semi-automated Biochemistry Analyzers and Fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzers - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027

Table 80: China Historic Review for Blood Cell Analyzer by Product Type - Semi-automated Biochemistry Analyzers and Fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzers Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 81: China 15-Year Perspective for Blood Cell Analyzer by Product Type - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Semi-automated Biochemistry Analyzers and Fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzers for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 82: China Current & Future Analysis for Blood Cell Analyzer by Modality - Bench-top and Floor-standing - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027

Table 83: China Historic Review for Blood Cell Analyzer by Modality - Bench-top and Floor-standing Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 84: China 15-Year Perspective for Blood Cell Analyzer by Modality - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Bench-top and Floor-standing for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

Table 85: China Current & Future Analysis for Blood Cell Analyzer by Application - Clinical Diagnostics, Drug development and Other Applications - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027

Table 86: China Historic Review for Blood Cell Analyzer by Application - Clinical Diagnostics, Drug development and Other Applications Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019

Table 87: China 15-Year Perspective for Blood Cell Analyzer by Application - Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Clinical Diagnostics, Drug development and Other Applications for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027

See the original post here:
Global Blood Cell Analyzer Industry - Yahoo Finance