Blindness – StemCell Therapy

Archive for the ‘Blindness’ Category

Inattentional Blindness in Psychology – Verywell Mind

♫ Tuesday, October 8th, 2019

It's logical to think that you see whenever your eyes are open. But the reality is that attention plays a major role in visual perception. One of the primary reasons why you may fail to notice things like obvious bloopers in movies, for example, is a psychological phenomenon known as inattentional blindness. When you focus hard on one thing, such as the actions of the main character in a film, you might not notice unexpected things entering your visual field.

The term "inattentional blindness" was first coined by psychologists Arien Mack, Ph.D., and Irvin Rock, Ph.D., who observed the phenomenon during their perception and attention experiments. "Because this inability to perceive, this sighted blindness, seemed to be caused by the fact that subjects were not attending to the stimulus but instead were attending to something else...we labeled this phenomenon inattentional blindness (IB)," they explained.

One of the best-known experiments demonstrating inattentional blindness is the "invisible gorilla test" carried out by Christopher Chabris, Ph.D. and Daniel Simons, Ph.D. In this experiment, researchers asked participants to watch a video of people tossing a basketball, and the observers were told to count the number of passes or to keep track of the number of throws versus bounce passes. Afterward, the participants were asked if they had noticed anything unusual while watching the video. In most of the tests, approximately 50 percent of the participants reported seeing nothing out of the ordinary.

But in reality, something odd had happened. In some instances, a woman dressed in a gorilla suit strolled through the scene, turned to the camera, thumped her chest, and walked away. While it may seem impossible that the participants missed such a sight since their attention was focused elsewhere and on a demanding task, the gorilla basically became invisible.

Rather than focusing on every tiny detail in the world around us, we tend to concentrate on things that are most important, relying on our existing schemas to "fill in the blanks." This is highly economical. As our attentional, cognitive, and processing resources are limited, this allows us to dedicate them to what matters most, while still allowing us to have complete, seamless experiences.

One of the reasons why people so often "miss the gorilla," so to speak, is simply because the stimulus lacks what is known as ecological validity. A gorilla showing up in the middle of a basketball game is unlikely to happen in a real-world setting, so we are less likely to notice it. It is essentially ruled out as a component that will help you better understand or carry out the task at hand.

That said, while we do sometimes fail to miss things in the world around us, we are generally pretty good at noticing information that is relevant to us, such as a car speeding toward us or a deer jumping out of the trees into the road. Of course, this is not always the case.

We all experience inattentional blindness from time to time, such as in these potential situations:

There are certain factors that can affect inattentional blindness. Drs. Simons and Chabris did an experiment similar to the invisible gorilla experiment, but in this one, the participants had to count the number of passes made by either the team in black or the team in white.

Out of the participants who were counting passes made by the white team, only 42 percent saw the gorilla, but for the participants who counted passes made by the black team, 83 percent saw the gorillawho was also dressed in black, illustrating the impact of similarity between the unexpected stimulus (gorilla) and task-relevant stimuli (members of the black team).

In the "Encyclopedia of Human Memory, psychologist Kristin Mauldin notes that inattentional blindness is similar to change blindness, which is when you miss a change in a stimulus that was there before. In inattentional blindness, you miss a new stimulus, often because of your own expectations.

A Word From Verywell

Though it is not possible to avoid all instances of inattentional blindness, it's important to remember this very natural occurrenceparticularly when you are in a disagreement with someone about the full scope of a situation. Your brain is sophisticated enough to help you register and interpret visual cues that it thinks will provide you with the most value. But, in its efforts, visual informationboth important and notcan sometimes get overlooked.

Read the rest here:
Inattentional Blindness in Psychology - Verywell Mind

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

50 Bible Verses about Blindness

♫ Tuesday, October 8th, 2019

Matthew 23:16-26

"Woe to you, blind guides, who say, 'Whoever swears by the temple, that is nothing; but whoever swears by the gold of the temple is obligated.' "You fools and blind men! Which is more important, the gold or the temple that sanctified the gold? "And, 'Whoever swears by the altar, that is nothing, but whoever swears by the offering on it, he is obligated.' read more."You blind men, which is more important, the offering, or the altar that sanctifies the offering? "Therefore, whoever swears by the altar, swears both by the altar and by everything on it. "And whoever swears by the temple, swears both by the temple and by Him who dwells within it. "And whoever swears by heaven, swears both by the throne of God and by Him who sits upon it. "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint and dill and cummin, and have neglected the weightier provisions of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness; but these are the things you should have done without neglecting the others. "You blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel! "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and of the dish, but inside they are full of robbery and self-indulgence. "You blind Pharisee, first clean the inside of the cup and of the dish, so that the outside of it may become clean also.

See more here:
50 Bible Verses about Blindness

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

What Is Glaucoma? – American Academy of Ophthalmology

♫ Monday, June 3rd, 2019

Glaucoma is a disease that damages your eyes optic nerve. It usually happens when fluid builds up in the front part of your eye. That extra fluid increases the pressure in your eye, damaging the optic nerve.

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness for people over 60 years old. But blindness from glaucoma can often be prevented with early treatment.

In a healthy eye, excess fluid leaves the eye throughthe drainage angle, keeping pressure stable.

There are two major types of glaucoma.

This is the most common type of glaucoma. It happens gradually, where the eye does not drain fluid as well as it should (like a clogged drain). As a result, eye pressure builds and starts to damage the optic nerve. This type of glaucoma is painless and causes no vision changes at first.

Some people can have optic nerves that are sensitive to normal eye pressure. This means their risk of getting glaucoma is higher than normal. Regular eye exams are important to find early signs of damage to their optic nerve.

This type happens when someones iris is very close to the drainage angle in their eye. The iris can end up blocking the drainage angle. You can think of it like a piece of paper sliding over a sink drain. When the drainage angle gets completely blocked, eye pressure rises very quickly. This is called an acute attack. It is a true eye emergency, and you should call your ophthalmologist right away or you might go blind.

Here are the signs of an acute angle-closure glaucoma attack:

Many people with angle-closure glaucoma develop it slowly. This is called chronic angle-closure glaucoma. There are no symptoms at first, so they dont know they have it until the damage is severe or they have an attack.

Angle-closure glaucoma can cause blindness if not treated right away.

Visit link:
What Is Glaucoma? - American Academy of Ophthalmology

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

What Is Color Blindness? – American Academy of Ophthalmology

♫ Sunday, May 19th, 2019

Color blindness occurs when you are unable to see colors in a normal way. It is also known as color deficiency. Color blindness often happens when someone cannot distinguish between certain colors. This usually happens between greens and reds, and occasionally blues.

In the retina, there are two types of cells that detect light. They are called rods and cones. Rods detect only light and dark and are very sensitive to low light levels. Cone cells detect color and are concentrated near the center of your vision. There are three types of cones that see color: red, green and blue. The brain uses input from these cone cells to determine our color perception.

Color blindness can happen when one or more of the color cone cells are absent, not working, or detect a different color than normal. Severe color blindness occurs when all three cone cells are absent. Mild color blindness happens when all three cone cells are present but one cone cell does not work right. It detects a different color than normal.

There are different degrees of color blindness. Some people with mild color deficiencies can see colors normally in good light but have difficulty in dim light. Others cannot distinguish certain colors in any light. The most severe form of color blindness, in which everything is seen in shades of gray, is uncommon. Color blindness usually affects both eyes equally and remains stable throughout life.

Color blindness is usually something that you have from birth but you can also get it later in life. Change in color vision can signify a more serious condition. Anyone who experiences a significant change in color perception should see an ophthalmologist.

See the original post here:
What Is Color Blindness? - American Academy of Ophthalmology

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

A Definition of Blindness – National Federation of the Blind

♫ Sunday, May 19th, 2019

Future ReflectionsSpecial Issue: Low Vision and Blindness 2005

(back) (contents) (next)

by Kenneth Jernigan

Kenneth Jernigan

Editor's Note: It may seem odd to begin a special issue about low vision with a definition of blindness, but sometimes the fastest route to a destination is not the most direct. As you read this issue, you will find the words low vision, visually impaired, partially sighted, legally blind (and maybe a few others) used interchangeably with the word blind. Over the decades professionals have often attempted to establish definitions for these terms based on a hierarchy of degree of vision loss; all of those attempts failed. In other words, there is no one accepted definition of, for example, "low vision" or "visually impaired." But the National Federation of the Blind does not view this as a problem. Dr. Kenneth Jernigan, president of the NFB from 1968 to 1986 and an active leader of the organization right up to his death in 1998, explained it this way:

Before we can talk intelligently about the problems of blindness or the potentialities of blind people, we must have a workable definition of blindness. Most of us are likely familiar with the generally accepted legal definition: visual acuity of not greater than 20/200 in the better eye with correction or a field not subtending an angle greater than 20 degrees. But this is not really a satisfactory definition. It is, rather, a way of recognizing in medical and measurable terms something which must be defined not medically or physically but functionally.

Putting to one side for a moment the medical terminology, what is blindness? Once I asked a group of high school students this question, and one of them replied--apparently believing that she was making a rather obvious statement--that a person is blind if she "can't see." When the laughter subsided, I asked the student if she really meant what she said. She replied that she did. I then asked her whether she would consider a person blind who could see light but who could not see objects--a person who would bump into things unless she used a cane, a dog, or some other travel aid and who would, if she depended solely on the use of her eyesight, walk directly into a telephone pole or fire plug. After some little hesitation the student said that she would consider such a person to be blind. I agreed with her and then went on to point out the obvious-that she literally did not mean that the definition of blindness was to be unable to see.

I next told this student of a man I had known who had normal (20/20) visual acuity in both eyes but who had such an extreme case of sensitivity to light that he literally could not keep his eyes open at all. The slightest amount of light caused such excruciating pain that the only way he could open his eyes was by prying them open with his fingers. Nevertheless, this person, despite the excruciating pain he felt while doing it, could read the eye chart without difficulty. The readings showed that he had "normal sight." This individual applied to the local Welfare Department for Public Assistance to the Blind and was duly examined by their ophthalmologist. The question I put to the student was this: "If you had been the ophthalmologist, would you have granted the aid or not?"

Her answer was, "Yes."

"Remember," I told her, "under the law you are forbidden to give aid to any person who is not actually blind. Would you still have granted the assistance?" The student said that she would. Again, I agreed with her, but I pointed out that, far from her first facetious statement, what she was saying was this: It is possible for one to have "perfect sight" and still in the physical, literal sense of the word be blind.

I then put a final question to the student. I asked her whether if a sighted person were put into a vault which was absolutely dark so that he could see nothing whatever, it would be accurate to refer to that sighted person as a blind man. After some hesitation and equivocation the student said, "No." For a third time I agreed with her. Then I asked her to examine what we had established.

1. To be blind does not mean that one cannot see. (Here again I must interrupt to say that I am not speaking in spiritual or figurative terms but in the most literal sense of the word.) 2. It is possible for an individual to have "perfect sight" and yet be physically and literally blind. 3. It is possible for an individual not to be able to see at all and still be a sighted person.

What, then, in light of these seeming contradictions is the definition of blindness? In my way of thinking it is this: One is blind to the extent that the individual must devise alternative techniques to do efficiently those things which he would do if he had normal vision. An individual may properly be said to be "blind" or a "blind person" when he has to devise so many alternative techniques--that is, if he is to function efficiently--that his pattern of daily living is substantially altered. It will be observed that I say alternative not substitute techniques, for the word substitute connotes inferiority, and the alternative techniques employed by the blind person need not be inferior to visual techniques. In fact, some of them are superior. The usually accepted legal definition of blindness already given (that is, visual acuity of less than 20/200 with correction or a field of less than 20 degrees) is simply one medical way of measuring and recognizing that anyone with better vision than the amount mentioned in the definition will (although he may have to devise some alternative techniques) likely not have to devise so many such techniques as to alter substantially his patterns of daily living. On the other hand, anyone with less vision than that mentioned in the legal definition will usually (I emphasize the word usually, for such is not always the case) need to devise so many such alternative techniques as to alter quite substantially his patterns of daily living.

It may be of some interest to apply this standard to the three cases already discussed:

First, what of the person who has light perception but sees little or nothing else? In at least one situation he can function as a sighted person. If, before going to bed, he wished to know whether the lights are out in his home, he can simply walk through the house and "see." If he did not have light perception, he would have to use some alternative technique--touch the bulb, tell by the position of the switch, have some sighted person give him the information, or devise some other method. However, this person is still quite properly referred to as a blind person. This one visual technique which he uses is such a small part of his overall pattern of daily living as to be negligible in the total picture. The patterns of his daily living are substantially altered. In the main he employs alternative techniques to do those things which he would do with sight if he had normal vision--that is, he does if he functions efficiently.

Next, let us consider the person who has normal visual acuity but cannot hold his eyes open because of his sensitivity to light. He must devise alternative techniques to do anything which he would do with sight if he had normal vision. He is quite properly considered to be a "blind person."

Finally, what of the sighted person who is put into a vault which has no light? Even though she can see nothing at all, she is still quite properly considered to be a "sighted person." She uses the same techniques that any other sighted person would use in a similar situation. There are no visual techniques which can be used in such circumstances. In fact, if a blind person found herself in such a situation, she might very well have a variety of techniques to use.

I repeat that, in my opinion, blindness can best be defined not physically or medically but functionally or sociologically. The alternative techniques which must be learned are the same for those born blind as for those who become blind as adults. They are quite similar (or should be) for those who are totally blind or nearly so and those who are "partially sighted" and yet are blind in the terms of the usually accepted legal definition. In other words, I believe that the complex distinctions which are often made between those who have partial sight and those who are totally blind, between those who have been blind from childhood and those who have become blind as adults are largely meaningless. In fact, they are often harmful since they place the wrong emphasis on blindness and its problems. Perhaps the greatest danger in the field of work for the blind today is the tendency to be hypnotized by jargon.

(back) (contents) (next)

Here is the original post:
A Definition of Blindness - National Federation of the Blind

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

Blindness by Ginger Scott

♫ Sunday, May 19th, 2019

It takes a while to know who you really are. And when you lose your way, sometimes its hard to find it again.

Charlie Hudson was on the verge of figuring that out when her dadthe only parent and friend she ever haddied suddenly. She was barely 18, and she was alone. So she went for easyplaying life safe, running away from a home that harbored nothing but bad memories an

Its funny how chance takes over when you need it most. And thats exactly what brought Cody Carmichael into her life. A former motocross super star, Cody was now happy to be living the blue collar life, spending his days finishing up school and his nights under the hood of some classic car, just trying to keep everything his father taught him alive. Cody and Charlie were living parallel lives, until they finally collided. And the moment he smiled at her, Charlie knew he was the one who would change everything. But was she willing to take the risk?

Cody saw through it all. He saw herall of her. But would letting him in be too much to take? And if Charlie let herself love himreally love himcould he love her back?

Read the rest here:
Blindness by Ginger Scott

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

Stem-Cell Treatment for Blindness Moving Through Patient …

♫ Tuesday, May 14th, 2019

A new treatment for macular degeneration is close to the next stage of human testinga noteworthy event not just for the millions of patients it could help, but for its potential to become the first therapy based on embryonic stem cells.

This year, the Boston-area company Advanced Cell Technology plans to move its stem-cell treatment for two forms of vision loss into advanced human trials. The company has already reported that the treatment is safe (see Eye Study Is a Small but Crucial Advance for Stem-Cell Therapy), although a full report of the results from the early, safety-focused testing has yet to be published. The planned trials will test whether it is effective. The treatment will be tested both on patients with Stargardts disease (an inherited form of progressive vision loss that can affect children) and on those with age-related macular degeneration, the leading cause of vision loss among people 65 and older.

The treatment is based on retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells that have been grown from embryonic stem cells. A surgeon injects 150 microliters of RPE cellsroughly the amount of liquid in three raindropsunder a patients retina, which is temporarily detached for the procedure. RPE cells support the retinas photoreceptors, which are the cells that detect incoming light and pass the information on to the brain.

Although complete data from the trials of ACTs treatments have yet to be published, the company has reported impressive results with one patient, who recovered vision after being deemed legally blind. Now the company plans to publish the data from two clinical trials taking place in the U.S. and the E.U. in a peer-reviewed academic journal. Each of these early-stage trials includes 12 patients affected by either macular degeneration or Stargardts disease.

The more advanced trials will have dozens of participants, says ACTs head of clinical development, Eddy Anglade. If proved safe and effective, the cellular therapy could preserve the vision of millions affected by age-related macular degeneration. By 2020, as the population ages, nearly 200 million people worldwide will have the disease, estimate researchers. Currently, there are no treatments available for the most common form, dry age-related macular degeneration.

ACTs experimental treatment has its origins in a chance discovery that Irina Klimanskaya, the companys director of stem-cell biology, made while working with embryonic stem cells at Harvard University. These cells have the power to develop into any cell type, and in culture they often change on their own. A neuron here, a fat cell thereindividual cells in a dish tend to take random walks down various developmental paths. By supplying the cultures with fresh nutrients but otherwise leaving them to their own devices for several weeks, Klimanskaya discovered that the stem cells often developed into darkly pigmented cells that grew in a cobblestone-like pattern. She suspected that they were developing into RPE cells, and molecular tests backed her up.

Now that her discovery has advanced into an experimental treatment, Klimanskaya says she is excited by the hints that it may be able to preserve, and perhaps restore, sight. She recalls a voice mail she received during her second year at ACT: a person blinded by an inherited condition thanked her for her work, whether or not there was a treatment available for him. When you get a message like this, you feel like you are not doing it in vain, she says.

See the article here:
Stem-Cell Treatment for Blindness Moving Through Patient ...

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

What Does the Bible Say About Spiritual Blindness?

♫ Tuesday, May 14th, 2019

2 Corinthians 4:4ESV / 4,056 helpful votesHelpfulNot Helpful

In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

Let them alone; they are blind guides. And if the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit.

And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled only to those who are perishing. In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

For God, who said, Let light shine out of darkness, has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.

Jesus said, For judgment I came into this world, that those who do not see may see, and those who see may become blind.

The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned.

Again Jesus spoke to them, saying, I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.

The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim liberty to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed,

For you say, I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing, not realizing that you are wretched, pitiable, poor, blind, and naked.

But whoever hates his brother is in the darkness and walks in the darkness, and does not know where he is going, because the darkness has blinded his eyes.

He has blinded their eyes and hardened their heart, lest they see with their eyes, and understand with their heart, and turn, and I would heal them.

The Lord opens the eyes of the blind. The Lord lifts up those who are bowed down; the Lord loves the righteous.

Jesus said, For judgment I came into this world, that those who do not see may see, and those who see may become blind. Some of the Pharisees near him heard these things, and said to him, Are we also blind? Jesus said to them, If you were blind, you would have no guilt; but now that you say, We see, your guilt remains.

But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light.

I will bring distress on mankind, so that they shall walk like the blind, because they have sinned against the Lord; their blood shall be poured out like dust, and their flesh like dung.

For at one time you were darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Walk as children of light

Lest you be wise in your own sight, I want you to understand this mystery, brothers: a partial hardening has come upon Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in.

Woe to you, blind guides, who say, If anyone swears by the temple, it is nothing, but if anyone swears by the gold of the temple, he is bound by his oath.

The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.

Open my eyes, that I may behold wondrous things out of your law.

Then the eyes of the blind shall be opened, and the ears of the deaf unstopped;

To open their eyes, so that they may turn from darkness to light and from the power of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and a place among those who are sanctified by faith in me.

For the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God's law; indeed, it cannot.

He answered, Whether he is a sinner I do not know. One thing I do know, that though I was blind, now I see.

But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.

As he passed by, he saw a man blind from birth. And his disciples asked him, Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind? Jesus answered, It was not that this man sinned, or his parents, but that the works of God might be displayed in him. We must work the works of him who sent me while it is day; night is coming, when no one can work. As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world. ...

Whoever says he is in the light and hates his brother is still in darkness.

For since, in the wisdom of God, the world did not know God through wisdom, it pleased God through the folly of what we preach to save those who believe.

But to this day the Lord has not given you a heart to understand or eyes to see or ears to hear.

Knowing this first of all, that scoffers will come in the last days with scoffing, following their own sinful desires.

But for those who are self-seeking and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, there will be wrath and fury.

Whom have you mocked and reviled? Against whom have you raised your voice and lifted your eyes to the heights? Against the Holy One of Israel!

And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.

To the choirmaster. Of David. The fool says in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds, there is none who does good.

They said to you, In the last time there will be scoffers, following their own ungodly passions.

The one who rejects me and does not receive my words has a judge; the word that I have spoken will judge him on the last day.

This is why I speak to them in parables, because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand.

And I will lead the blind in a way that they do not know, in paths that they have not known I will guide them. I will turn the darkness before them into light, the rough places into level ground. These are the things I do, and I do not forsake them.

For this people's heart has grown dull, and with their ears they can barely hear, and their eyes they have closed, lest they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears and understand with their heart and turn, and I would heal them.

And you shall grope at noonday, as the blind grope in darkness, and you shall not prosper in your ways. And you shall be only oppressed and robbed continually, and there shall be no one to help you.

But Jesus went to the Mount of Olives. Early in the morning he came again to the temple. All the people came to him, and he sat down and taught them. The scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman who had been caught in adultery, and placing her in the midst they said to him, Teacher, this woman has been caught in the act of adultery. Now in the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. So what do you say? ...

And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth.

And as Jesus passed on from there, two blind men followed him, crying aloud, Have mercy on us, Son of David. When he entered the house, the blind men came to him, and Jesus said to them, Do you believe that I am able to do this? They said to him, Yes, Lord. Then he touched their eyes, saying, According to your faith be it done to you. And their eyes were opened. And Jesus sternly warned them, See that no one knows about it.

You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

Yes, to this day whenever Moses is read a veil lies over their hearts.

They have neither knowledge nor understanding, they walk about in darkness; all the foundations of the earth are shaken.

As it is written, God gave them a spirit of stupor, eyes that would not see and ears that would not hear, down to this very day.

To open the eyes that are blind, to bring out the prisoners from the dungeon, from the prison those who sit in darkness.

He has delivered us from the domain of darkness and transferred us to the kingdom of his beloved Son,

Hear, you deaf, and look, you blind, that you may see!

Jesus heard that they had cast him out, and having found him he said, Do you believe in the Son of Man? He answered, And who is he, sir, that I may believe in him? Jesus said to him, You have seen him, and it is he who is speaking to you. He said, Lord, I believe, and he worshiped him. Jesus said, For judgment I came into this world, that those who do not see may see, and those who see may become blind. ...

No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him. And I will raise him up on the last day.

And the great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent, who is called the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole worldhe was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.

Paul, a servant of Christ Jesus, called to be an apostle, set apart for the gospel of God, which he promised beforehand through his prophets in the holy Scriptures, concerning his Son, who was descended from David according to the flesh and was declared to be the Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness by his resurrection from the dead, Jesus Christ our Lord, through whom we have received grace and apostleship to bring about the obedience of faith for the sake of his name among all the nations, ...

In order that all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God, who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God.

He answered, The man called Jesus made mud and anointed my eyes and said to me, Go to Siloam and wash. So I went and washed and received my sight.

Bring out the people who are blind, yet have eyes, who are deaf, yet have ears!

Jesus heard that they had cast him out, and having found him he said, Do you believe in the Son of Man?

But when one turns to the Lord, the veil is removed.

And this is the judgment: the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil.

And this is the judgment: the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil. For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed.

So that we would not be outwitted by Satan; for we are not ignorant of his designs.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Now this I say and testify in the Lord, that you must no longer walk as the Gentiles do, in the futility of their minds. They are darkened in their understanding, alienated from the life of God because of the ignorance that is in them, due to their hardness of heart. They have become callous and have given themselves up to sensuality, greedy to practice every kind of impurity.

That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died.

Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil.

For the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God's law; indeed, it cannot. Those who are in the flesh cannot please God.

For whoever lacks these qualities is so nearsighted that he is blind, having forgotten that he was cleansed from his former sins.

Then Jesus said to the crowds and to his disciples, The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses' seat, so practice and observe whatever they tell youbut not what they do. For they preach, but do not practice. They tie up heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on people's shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to move them with their finger. They do all their deeds to be seen by others. For they make their phylacteries broad and their fringes long, ...

The brothers immediately sent Paul and Silas away by night to Berea, and when they arrived they went into the Jewish synagogue. Now these Jews were more noble than those in Thessalonica; they received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so.

In that day you will know that I am in my Father, and you in me, and I in you. Whoever has my commandments and keeps them, he it is who loves me. And he who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and manifest myself to him. Judas (not Iscariot) said to him, Lord, how is it that you will manifest yourself to us, and not to the world? Jesus answered him, If anyone loves me, he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him.

For the Lord has poured out upon you a spirit of deep sleep, and has closed your eyes (the prophets), and covered your heads (the seers).

For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.

Saul rose from the ground, and although his eyes were opened, he saw nothing. So they led him by the hand and brought him into Damascus.

But if your eye is bad, your whole body will be full of darkness. If then the light in you is darkness, how great is the darkness!

For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin.

Whoever loves his brother abides in the light, and in him there is no cause for stumbling.

But blessed are your eyes, for they see, and your ears, for they hear.

And he said, Who are you, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting.

He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authoritiesall things were created through him and for him.

Again he appoints a certain day, Today, saying through David so long afterward, in the words already quoted, Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts.

And they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, after being captured by him to do his will.

Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his might. Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places. Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand firm. Stand therefore, having fastened on the belt of truth, and having put on the breastplate of righteousness, ...

For since the message declared by angels proved to be reliable, and every transgression or disobedience received a just retribution, how shall we escape if we neglect such a great salvation? It was declared at first by the Lord, and it was attested to us by those who heard, while God also bore witness by signs and wonders and various miracles and by gifts of the Holy Spirit distributed according to his will.

Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour. Resist him, firm in your faith, knowing that the same kinds of suffering are being experienced by your brotherhood throughout the world.

Whoever confesses that Jesus is the Son of God, God abides in him, and he in God.

By this we know that we abide in him and he in us, because he has given us of his Spirit.

Do not love the world or the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the worldthe desires of the flesh and the desires of the eyes and pride in possessionsis not from the Father but is from the world.

Those who are in the flesh cannot please God. You, however, are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if in fact the Spirit of God dwells in you. Anyone who does not have the Spirit of Christ does not belong to him.

So that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes.

You are to deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord.

Do not deprive one another, except perhaps by agreement for a limited time, that you may devote yourselves to prayer; but then come together again, so that Satan may not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.

Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen. For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error. And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done. ...

Go to this people, and say, You will indeed hear but never understand, and you will indeed see but never perceive. For this people's heart has grown dull, and with their ears they can barely hear, and their eyes they have closed; lest they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears and understand with their heart and turn, and I would heal them.

Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life, and we have believed, and have come to know, that you are the Holy One of God.

If you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Helper, to be with you forever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him. You know him, for he dwells with you and will be in you.

And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done. They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips, slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless. Though they know God's decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.

See the original post here:
What Does the Bible Say About Spiritual Blindness?

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

National Blindness Professional Certification Board

♫ Friday, April 26th, 2019

The National Blindness Professional Certification Board (NBPCB) was created to certify qualified specialists in work with the blind. At present, the Certification Board oversees four certifications - the National Orientation and Mobility Certification (NOMC), the National Certification in Rehabilitation Teaching for the Blind (NCRTB), the National Certification in Literary Braille (NCLB), and the National Certification in Unified English Braille (NCUEB).

The National Orientation and Mobility Certification (NOMC) emphasizes nonvisual instruction, and Structured Discovery Cane Travel .

The National Certification in Rehabilitation Teaching for the Blind (NCRTB) emphasizes nonvisual instruction through Structured Discovery Rehabilitation Teaching methods and principles.

The National Certification in Literary Braille (NCLB) is specifically intended for teachers working with blind children or adults. All those who are certified will hold valid certification until their expiration date; however, it is no longer offered and has been replaced with the NCUEB.

The National certification in Unified English Braille (NCUEB) is specifically intended for professionals working with blind children or adults.

The NBPCB has also developed an approval process for orientation training centers who utilize Structured Discovery methodology throughout their programs and a consumer-focused approach.

Subscribe to the O&M Announcement List

Subscribe to the Braille Announcement list

For details regarding how to schedule any of our certification exams in your area, please contact us atadmin@nbpcb.org.

Go here to read the rest:
National Blindness Professional Certification Board

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

Blindness – askjan.org

♫ Sunday, April 21st, 2019

The Disability Management Employer Coalition (DMEC) is committed to providing focused education for absence management professionals. From face-to-face conferences to helpful tools and resources, we give you what you need to reduce costs, minimize lost work time, and increase staff productivity.

Presenters:

The National APSE Conference is the only national conference focused solely on the advancement of Employment First. The Association of People Supporting Employment First (APSE) National Conference brings together more than 1,000 community leaders, businesses, and individuals with disabilities from across the country and around the world to network and discuss state-of-the-art strategies to ensure equitable employment for all citizens with disabilities.

The EXCEL Training Conference is sponsored by the EEOC's Training Institute. In its 21st year, EXCEL is the premier national training conference for federal and private sector EEO managers, supervisors, practitioners, HR professionals, attorneys and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) specialists. Private and public sector employees will gain invaluable knowledge for making those tough HR decisions!

Presenters:

The 2018 ILG National Conference held in Anaheim California is the premier meeting ground in 2018 for employers involved and interested in OFCCP compliance and EEOC issues. The 2018 ILG National Conference convenes industry experts, HR, compensation, legal and talent acquisition professionals to discuss the latest issues and information impacting affirmative action and equal opportunity employment and diversity and inclusion.

Presenters:

Slides - Tools, Techniques, and Technologies for Creating Inclusive Workplaces

Handout - Tools, Techniques, and Technologies for Creating Inclusive Workplaces

Presenters:

Slides - Tools, Techniques, and Technologies for Creating Inclusive Workplaces

Handout - Tools, Techniques, and Technologies for Creating Inclusive Workplaces

At the 2018 DMEC Annual Conference, youll connect with 700+ like-minded absence, disability, and return-to-work professionals who are looking to tackle strategic workforce issues facing their organizations.And with 40+ sessions and events, you will:Gain insights from those on the front line, giving you expert knowledge on how to address the complex leave and disability issues you are facing in your organization.Share ideas with peers and executive thought leaders from across the country.Take back proven strategies, actionable ideas, and tested program models to assist with the development of cost-saving programs in your company."

Go here to see the original:
Blindness - askjan.org

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

WebAIM: Visual Disabilities – Color-blindness

♫ Wednesday, March 27th, 2019

You are here: Home > Articles > Visual Disabilities > Page 4: Color-blindness

Before getting into the details of the types of color-blindness, you should know that the following explanations are simplified versions of the complete picture. Color-blindness is a fascinating topic precisely because of its complexity. You do not need to understand all of the details of color-blindness to know how to create web content that is accessible to those who are color-blind. Here is an important fact to understand right off the bat:

Important

The key principle of web accessibility for users with color-blindness is:

The colors with which they have difficulty distinguishing depend upon their type of color-blindness, but red-green deficiencies are the most common.

The most common broad category of color-blindness is often called red-green color-blindness, but this does not mean that these people cannot see reds or greens. They simply have a harder time differentiating between them. Not all reds and greens are indistinguishable. It would be easy for someone with a red-green deficiency to tell the difference between a light green and a dark red, for example. A lot dependsat least in parton how dark the colors are. If the red is approximately as dark as the green, there is a greater likelihood that the colors will be confused.

Also, there is some evidence that people with red-green color-blindness see reds and greens as yellows, oranges and beiges. This means that yellows, oranges, and beiges can be confused with greens and reds. The colors least affected are the blues.

When designing web content for people who are color-blind you do NOT have to convert all of your images to black and white or get rid of your images entirely. In fact, you may not have to change any of your images at all. Here is the key:

Important

Make sure that colors are not your only method of conveying important information.

Most of the time when people put images on the web, the fact that they are in color at all is irrelevant. It may be nicer to see the colors, but the viewer can understand the image just fine even with all of the colors removed. If, however, the purpose of posting the image is to communicate something about the colors in that image, then it is important to provide some other way of understanding the information. For example, if the image shows the routes of the London Underground, where the routes are distinguished only by the color of the lines, as in the graphic below, you would want to somehow annotate either the graphic itself (and supply the appropriate alt text) or the text in the web page to supplement the color-dependent method of distinguishing between routes.

Incidentally, people with color-blindness are not the only ones who will benefit from this technique. Those who are blind are also unable to distinguish between colors, and so are in need of the extra cues given through other methods.

Read this article:
WebAIM: Visual Disabilities - Color-blindness

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

Colblindor All about Color Blindness

♫ Friday, February 8th, 2019

Color blindness (or colour blindness or more specific color vision deficiency (CVD)) is well known but hard to imagine if you are not suffering from it. So usually people are either looking for more information to learn about color blindness and all its details, would like to better understand the vision by simulating it or want to test themselves with some form of color blindness test. All this you can be found here on color-blindness.com and much more.

Color blindness affects approximately every 1 in 12 men (8%) and 1 in 200 women (0.5%). This means there is definitely one in your neighborhood or school class affected by it. Most of them are male, because the most common form called red-green color blindness (a term wich is also misleading) is encoded on the x-chromosome and therefore sex-linked. As red-green color blindness is inherited from a mother to her son, a father never passes this type of color blindness on to his children.

The term red-green color blindness is often used but actually not quite correct. Ever type of color vision deficiency affects the whole color spectrum and therefore can not be reduced to just certain colors. Of course, for the most often encountered types Protanomly (the milder form or red-weakness) or Protanopia (missing red cones, red-blindness) and Deuteranomaly (green-weakness) or Deuteranopia (green-blindness) the colors red and green are the most problematic and misinterpreted or indistinguishable ones. But people suffering from any of those forms have issues with the red or green part in every color, so the whole spectrum of colors is affected.

Besides red-green color blindness, which is encoded on the x-chromosome (sex-linked) and therefore much more common for men, there are also forms of color vision deficiency which are evenly distributed between male and female like Tritanomaly (blue-weakness) or Tritanopia (blue-blindness) and the real color blindness Achromatopsia (monochromacy) or the so called blue-cone monochromacy (only blue cones).

Color blindness simulation is fascinating! If you are not colorblind it is so hard to imagine what it looks like to be colorblind: Which color do you see? Do you see any at all? What does it mean not to be able to see red? and so on. My COlor BLIndness Simulator is a handy tool which allows you to use your own images and try out all the different simulation types. It is even possible to save any simulated image and have a one-by-one comparison.

Online color blindness testing is often done but unfortunately no yet as good as it could be. Usually youll find out about color blindness at school or when visiting an eye specialist and want to confirm this with some online tools. There are online color blindness tests available, but most of them are not reliable and cannot compensate a visit at your eye specialist. There is a new form of color blindness test coming up: Color Blind Check uses a new method and its results look very promising. But this new form still needs more time to develop and calibration to count as a trustable color blindness test.

View post:
Colblindor All about Color Blindness

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

Inattentional blindness – Wikipedia

♫ Tuesday, January 15th, 2019

Inattentional blindness, also known as perceptual blindness, is a psychological lack of attention that is not associated with any vision defects or deficits. It may be further defined as the event in which an individual fails to perceive an unexpected stimulus that is in plain sight. When it simply becomes impossible for one to attend to all the stimuli in a given situation, a temporary blindness effect can take place as a result; that is, individuals fail to see objects or stimuli that are unexpected and quite often salient.[1] The term was coined by Arien Mack and Irvin Rock in 1992 and was used as the title of their book of the same name, published by MIT press in 1998,[2] in which they describe the discovery of the phenomenon and include a collection of procedures used in describing it.[3] A famous study that demonstrated inattentional blindness asked participants whether or not they noticed a gorilla walking through the scene of a visual task they had been given.[1]

Research on inattentional blindness suggests that the phenomenon can occur in any individual, independent of cognitive deficits. However, recent evidence shows that patients with ADHD performed better attentionally when engaging in inattentional blindness tasks than control patients did,[4] suggesting that some mental deficits may decrease the effects of this phenomenon. Recent studies have also looked at age differences and inattentional blindness scores, and results show that the effect increases as humans age.[5][6][7] There is mixed evidence that consequential unexpected objects are noticed more: Some studies suggest that we can detect threatening unexpected stimuli more easily than nonthreatening ones,[8][9] but other studies suggest that this is not the case.[10][11][12] There is some evidence that objects associated with reward are noticed more.[12]

Numerous experiments[13] and art work [14][15][16][17] has demonstrated that inattentional blindness also has an effect on people's perception.

The following criteria are required to classify an event as an inattentional blindness episode: 1) the observer must fail to notice a visual object or event, 2) the object or event must be fully visible, 3) observers must be able to readily identify the object if they are consciously perceiving it,[3] and 4) the event must be unexpected and the failure to see the object or event must be due to the engagement of attention on other aspects of the visual scene and not due to aspects of the visual stimulus itself.[3] Individuals who experience inattentional blindness are usually unaware of this effect, which can play a subsequent role on behavior.

Inattentional blindness is related to but distinct from other failures of visual awareness such as change blindness, repetition blindness, visual masking, and attentional blink. The key aspect of inattentional blindess which makes it distinct from other failures in awareness rests on the fact that the undetected stimulus is unexpected.[18] It is the unexpected nature of said stimulus that differentiates inattentional blindness from failures of awareness such as attentional failures like the aforementioned attentional blink. It is critical to acknowledge that occurrences of inattentional blindness are attributed to the failure to consciously attend to an item in the visual field as opposed the absence of cognitive processing.

Findings such as inattentional blindness the failure to notice a fully visible but unexpected object because attention was engaged on another task, event, or object has changed views on how the brain stores and integrates visual information, and has led to further questioning and investigation of the brain and importantly of cognitive processes.

Cognitive capture or, cognitive tunneling, is an inattentional blindness phenomenon in which the observer is too focused on instrumentation, task at hand, internal thought, etc. and not on the present environment. For example, while driving, a driver focused on the speedometer and not on the road is suffering from cognitive capture.[a]

One of the most foremost conflicts among researchers of inattentional blindness surrounds the processing of unattended stimuli. More specifically, there is disagreement in the literature about exactly how much processing of a visual scene is completed before selection dictates which stimuli will be consciously perceived, and which will not be (i.e. inattentional blindness). There exists two basic schools of thought on the issue those who believe selection occurs early in the perceptual process, and those who believe it occurs only after significant processing.[19] Early selection theorists propose that perception of stimuli is a limited process requiring selection to proceed. This suggests that the decision to attend to specific stimuli occurs early in processing, soon after the rudimentary study of physical features; only those selected stimuli are then fully processed. On the other hand, proponents of late selection theories argue that perception is an unlimited operation, and all stimuli in a visual scene are processed simultaneously. In this case, selection of relevant information is done after full processing of all stimuli.[20]

While early research on the topic was heavily focused on early selection, research since the late 1970s has been shifted mainly to the late selection theories. This change resulted primarily from a shift in paradigms used to study inattentional blindness which revealed new aspects of the phenomenon.[21] Today, late selection theories are generally accepted, and continue to be the focus of the majority of research concerning inattentional blindness.

A significant body of research has been gathered in support of late selection in the perception of visual stimuli.

One of the popular ways of investigating late selection is to assess the priming properties (i.e. influencing subsequent acts[22]) of unattended stimuli. Often used to demonstrate such effects is the stem completion task. While there exist a few variations, these studies generally consist of showing participants the first few letters of words, and asking them to complete the string of letters to form an English word.[22] It has been demonstrated that observers are significantly more likely to complete word fragments with the unattended stimuli presented in a trial than with another similar word.[2] This effect holds when stimuli are not words, but instead objects. When photos of objects are shown too quickly for participants to identify, subsequent presentation of those items lead to significantly faster identification in comparison to novel objects.[22]

A notable study by Mack and Rock has also revealed that showing a word stimulus differing from the participant's name by one letter did not generally call conscious attention. By simply changing a character, transforming the presented word into the observer's first name, the now highly meaningful stimulus is significantly more likely to be attended to. This suggests that the stimuli are being extensively processed, at least enough to analyze their meaning. These results point to the fact that attentional selection may be determined late in processing.[2]

The evidence outlined above suggests that even when stimuli are not processed to the level of conscious attention, they are nonetheless perceptually and cognitively processed, and can indeed exert effects on subsequent behavior.[23]

While the evidence supporting late selection hypotheses is significant and has been consistently reproduced, there also exists a body of research suggesting that unattended stimuli in fact may not receive significant processing.

For example, in an functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study by Rees and colleagues, brain activity was recorded while participants completed a perceptual task. Here they examined the neural processing of meaningful (words) and meaningless (consonant string) stimuli both when attended to, and when these same items were unattended. While no difference in activation patterns were found between the groups when the stimuli were unattended, differences in neural processing were observed for meaningful versus meaningless stimuli to which participants overtly attended. This pattern of results suggests that ignored stimuli are not processed to the level of meaning, i.e. less extensively than attended stimuli.[24] Participants do not seem to be detecting meaning in stimuli to which they are not consciously attending.

This particular hypothesis bridges the gap between the early and late selection theories. Authors integrate the viewpoint of early selection stating that perception is a limited process (i.e. cognitive resources are limited), and that of the late selection theories assuming perception as an automatic process.[20] This view proposes that the level of processing which occurs for any one stimulus is dependent on the current perceptual load. That is, if the current task is attentionally demanding and its processing exhausts all the available resources, little remains available to process other non-target stimuli in the visual field. Alternatively, if processing requires a small amount of attentional resources, perceptual load is low and attention is inescapably directed to the non-target stimuli.[19]

The effects of perceptual load on the occurrence of inattentional blindness is demonstrated in a study by Fougnie and Marois. Here, participants were asked to complete a memory task involving either the simple maintenance of verbal stimuli, or the rearrangement of this material, a more cognitively demanding exercise. While subjects were completing the assigned task, an unexpected visual stimulus was presented. Results revealed that unexpected stimuli were more likely to be missed during manipulation of information than in the more simple rehearsal task.[25]

In a similar type of study, fMRI recordings were done while subjects took part in either low-demand or high-demand subtraction tasks. While performing these exercises, novel visual distractors were presented. When task demands were low and used a smaller portion of the finite resources, distractors captured attention and sparked visual analysis as shown by brain activation in the primary visual cortex. These results, however, did not hold when perceptual load was high; in this condition, distractors were significantly less often attended to and processed.[19]

Thus, higher perceptual load, and therefore more significant use of attentional resources, appears to increase the likelihood of inattentional blindness episodes.

The theory of inattentional amnesia provides an alternative in the explanation of inattentional blindness in suggesting that the phenomenon does not stem from failures in capture of attention or in actual perception of stimuli, but instead from a failure in memory. The unnoticed stimuli in a visual scene are attended to and consciously perceived, but are rapidly forgotten rendering them impossible to report.[26] In essence, inattentional amnesia refers to the failure in creating a lasting explicit memory: by the time a subject is asked to recall seeing an item, their memory for the stimulus has vanished.[27]

While it is difficult to tease apart a failure in perception from one in memory, some research has attempted to shed light on the issue. In a now-classic study of inattentional blindness, a woman carrying an umbrella through a scene goes unnoticed. Despite stopping the video while she is walking through and immediately asking participants to identify which of two people they have seen leaving as little delay as possible between presentation and report observers very often fail to correctly identify the woman with the umbrella. No differences in performance were identified whether the video was stopped immediately after the unexpected event or moments later. These findings would seem to oppose the idea of inattentional amnesia, however advocates of the theory could always contend that the memory test simply came too late and that the memory had already been lost.[28]

The very phenomenon of inattentional blindness is defined by a lack of expectation for the unattended stimulus. Some researchers believe that it is not inattention that produces blindness, but in fact the aforementioned lack of expectation for the stimuli.[23] Proponents of this theory often state that classic methods for testing inattentional blindness are not manipulating attention per se, but instead the expectation for the presentation of a visual item.[29]

Studies investigating the effect of expectation on episodes of inattentional blindness have shown that once observers are made aware of the importance of the stimuli to be presented, for example stating that one will later be tested on it, the phenomenon essentially disappears.[2] While admitting to possible ambiguities in methodology, Mack, one of the foremost researchers in the field, holds strongly that inattentional blindness stems predominantly from a failure of attentional capture. She points out that if expectation does not mediate instances of very closely linked phenomena such as attentional blink and change blindness (whereby participants have difficulty identifying the changing object even when they are explicitly told to look for it), it is unlikely that inattentional blindness can be explained solely by a lack of expectation for stimulus presentation.[23]

The perceptual cycle framework has been used as another theoretical basis for inattentional blindness. The perceptual cycle framework describes attention capture and awareness capture as occurring at two different stages of processing. Attention capture occurs when there is a shift in attention due to the salience of a stimuli, and awareness capture refers to the conscious acknowledgement of stimuli. Attentional sets are important because it is composed of characteristics of stimuli an individual is processing. Inattentional blindness occurs when there is an interaction between an individual's attentional set and the salience of the unexpected stimulus. Recognizing the unexpected stimulus can occur when the characteristics of the unexpected stimulus resembles the characteristics of the perceived stimuli. The attentional set theory of inattentional blindness has implications for false memories and eyewitness testimony. The perceptual cycle framework offers four major implications about inattentional blindness 1) environmental cues aid in the detection of stimuli by providing orienting cues but is not enough to produce awareness, 2) perception requires effortful sustained attention, interpretation, and reinterpretation, 3) implicit memory may precede conscious perception, and 4) visual stimuli that is not expected, explored, or interpreted may not be perceived.[30]

Other bases for attentional blindness include top down and bottom up processing.

To test for inattentional blindness, researchers ask participants to complete a primary task while an unexpected stimulus is presented. Afterwards, researchers ask participants if they saw anything unusual during the primary task. Arien Mack and Irvin Rock describe a series of experiments that demonstrated inattentional blindness in their 1998 book, Inattentional Blindness.

The best-known study demonstrating inattentional blindness is the Invisible Gorilla Test, conducted by Daniel Simons of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Christopher Chabris of Harvard University. This study, a revised version of earlier studies conducted by Ulric Neisser, Neisser and Becklen in 1975, asked subjects to watch a short video of two groups of people (wearing black and white T-shirts) passing a basketball around. The subjects are told either to count the passes made by one of the teams or to keep count of bounce passes vs. aerial passes. In different versions of the video a person walks through the scene carrying an umbrella (as discussed above) or wearing a full gorilla suit. After watching the video, the subjects are asked whether they noticed anything out of the ordinary taking place. In most groups, 50% of the subjects did not report seeing the gorilla (or the person with the umbrella). Failure to perceive the anomalies is attributed to failure to attend to it while engaged in the difficult task of counting passes of the ball. These results indicate that the relationship between what is in one's visual field and perception is based much more on attention than was previously thought.[31]

Out 228 participants of the tests, only 194 those who did count the passes correctly were used for statistical purposes further. The percentage was even as low as 8% in one of the 16 tests performed.[32][33]

The basic Simons and Chabris study was reused on British television as a public safety advert designed to point out the potential dangers to cyclists caused by inattentional blindness in motorists. In the advert the gorilla is replaced by a moon-walking bear.[34]

In 1995, Officer Kenny Conley was chasing a shooting suspect. An undercover officer was in the same vicinity and was mistakenly taken down by other officers while Conley ran by and failed to notice. A jury later convicted Officer Conley of perjury and obstruction of justice, believing he had seen the fight and lied about it to protect fellow officers, yet he stood by his word that he had, in fact, not seen it.[35]

Christopher Chabris, Adam Weinberger, Matthew Fontaine and Daniel J. Simons took it upon themselves to see if this scenario was possible. They designed an experiment in which participants were asked to run about 30 feet behind an experimenter, and count how many times he touched his head. A fight was staged to appear about 8 meters off the path, and was visible for approximately 15 seconds. The procedure in its entirety lasted about 2 minutes and 45 seconds, and participants were then asked to report the number of times they had seen the experimenter touch his head with either hand (medium load), both hands (high load), or were not instructed to count at all (low load). After the run, participants were asked 3 questions: 1) If they had noticed the fight; 2) if they had noticed a juggler, and 3) if they had noticed someone dribbling a basketball. Questions 2) and 3) were control questions, and no one falsely reported these as true.

Participants were significantly more likely to notice the fight when the experiment was done during the day as opposed to in the dark. Additionally, sightings of the fight were most likely to be reported in the low load condition (72%) than in either the medium load (56%), or high load conditions (42%).[36] These results exemplify a real world occurrence of inattentional blindness, and provide evidence that officer Conley could indeed have missed the fight because his attention was focused elsewhere. Moreover, these results add to the body of knowledge suggesting that as perceptual load increases, less resources remain to process items not explicitly focused on, and in turn episodes of inattentional blindness become more frequent.

Another experiment was conducted by Steven Most, along with Daniel Simons, Christopher Chabris and Brian Scholl. Instead of a basketball game, they used stimuli presented by computer displays. In this experiment objects moved randomly on a computer screen. Participants were instructed to attend to the black objects and ignore the white, or vice versa. After several trials, a red cross unexpectedly appeared and traveled across the display, remaining on the computer screen for five seconds. The results of the experiment showed that even though the cross was distinctive from the black and white objects both in color and shape, about a third of participants missed it. They had found that people may be attentionally tuned to certain perceptual dimensions, such as brightness or shape. Inattentional blindness is most likely to occur if the unexpected stimuli presented resembles the environment.[37]

One interesting experiment displayed how cell phones contributed to inattentional blindness in basic tasks such as walking. The stimulus for this experiment was a brightly colored clown on a unicycle. The individuals participating in this experiment were divided into four sections. They were either talking on the phone, listening to an mp3 player, walking by themselves or walking in pairs. The study showed that individuals engaged in cell phone conversations were least likely to notice the clown. This experiment was designed by Ira E. Hyman, S. Matthew Boss, Breanne M. Wise, Kira E. Mckenzie and Jenna M. Caggiano at Western Washington University.[38]

Daniel Memmert conducted an experiment which suggests that an individual can look directly at an object and still not perceive it. This experiment was based on the invisible gorilla experiment. The participants were children with an average age of 7.7 years. Participants watched a short video of a six-player basketball game (three with white shirts, three with black shirts). The participants were instructed to watch only the players wearing black shirts and to count the times the team passed the ball. During the video a person in a gorilla suit walks through the scene. The film was projected onto a large screen (3.2 m X 2.4 m) and the participants sat in a chair 6 meters from the screen. Participants' eye movement and fixations were recorded during the video, and afterward the participants answered a series of questions.

Only 40% of the participants reported seeing the gorilla. There was no significant difference in accuracy of the counting between the two groups. Analyzing the eye movement and fixation data showed no significant difference in time spent looking at the players (black or white) between the two groups. However, the 60% of participants who did not report seeing the gorilla spent an average of 25 frames (about one second) fixated on the gorilla, despite not perceiving it.[39]

A more common example of blindness despite fixation is illustrated in the game of Three-card Monte.

Another experiment conducted by Daniel Memmert tested the effects of different levels of expertise can have on inattentional blindness. The participants in this experiment included six different groups: Adult basketball experts with an average of twelve years of experience, junior basketball experts with an average of five years, children who had practiced the game for an average of two years, and novice counterparts for each age group. In this experiment the participants watched the invisible gorilla experiment video. The participants were instructed to watch only the players wearing white and to count the times the team passed the ball.

The results showed that experts did not count the passes more accurately than novices but did show that adult subjects were more accurate than the junior and child subjects. A much higher percentage of experts noticed the gorilla compared with novices and even the practiced children. 62% of the adult experts and 60% of the junior experts noticed the gorilla, suggesting that the difference between five and twelve years of experience has minimal effect on inattentional blindness. However, only 38% of the adult, 35% of the junior, and none of the child novices noticed the gorilla. Only 18% of the children with two years of practice noticed. This suggests that both age and experience can have a significant effect on inattentional blindness.[39]

Arien Mack and Irvin Rock's concluded in 1998 that no conscious perception can occur without attention.[2] Evidence through research on inattentional blindness contemplates that it may be possible that inattentional blindness reflects a problem with memory rather than with perception.[2] It is argued that at least some instances of inattentional blindness are better characterized as memory failures than perceptual failures. The extent to which unattended stimuli fail to engage perceptual processing is an empirical question that the combination of inattentional blindness and other various measures of processing can be used to address.[3]

The theory behind inattentional blindness research suggests that we consciously experience only those objects and events to which we directly attend.[2] That means that the vast majority of information in our field of vision goes unnoticed. Thus if we miss the target stimulus in an experiment, but are later told about the existence of the stimulus, this sufficient awareness allows participants to report and recall the stimulus now that attention has been allocated to it.[3] Mack and Rock, and their colleagues discovered a striking array of visual events to which people are inattentionally blind.[2] However the debate arises whether this inattentional blindness was due to memory or perceptual processing limitations.

Mack and Rock note that explanations for inattentional blindness can reflect a basic failure of perceptual processes to be engaged by unattended stimuli. Or that it may reflect a failure of memorial processes to encode information about unattended stimuli. It is important to note that the memory failure does not have to do with forgetting something that has been encoded by losing access to the memory of the stimulus from time of presentation to time of retrieval, rather that the failure is attributed to information not being encoded when the stimulus was present.[2] It seems that inattentional blindness can be explained by both memory and perceptual failures because in experimental research participants may fail to report what was on display due to failures in encoded information (memory) or a failure in perceptually processed information (perception).[2]

There are similarities in the types of unconscious processing apparent in inattentional blindness and in neuropsychological syndromes such as visual neglect and extinction. The analogy between these phenomenon's seems to generate more questions as well as answers. These answers are fundamental for our understanding of the relationship between attention, stimulus coding and behavior.

Research has shown that some aspects of the syndrome of unilateral visual neglect appear to be similar to normal subjects in a state of inattentional blindness. In neglect, patients with lesions to the parietal cortex fail to respond to and report stimuli presented on the side of space contralateral to damage.[23][40] That is, they appear to be functionally blind to a range of stimuli. Since such lesions do not result in any sensory deficits, shortcomings have been explained in terms of a lack of attentional processing, for which the parietal cortex plays a large role.[41] These phenomena draw strong parallels to one another, as in both cases stimuli are perceptible but unreported when unattended.

In the phenomenon of extinction, patients can report the presence of a single stimulus presented on the affected side, but then fail to detect it when a second stimulus is presented simultaneously on the "good" (ipsilateral) side.[42] Here the stimulus on the affected side seems to lose under conditions of attentional competition from stimuli in the ipsilesional field.[42] The consequence of this competition is that the extinguished items may not be detected.

Similar to studies of inattentional blindness, there is evidence of processing taking place in the neglected field. For example, there can be semantic priming from a stimulus presented in the neglected field, which affects responses to stimuli subsequently presented on the unimpaired side.[43] Apparently in both neglect and inattentional blindness, there is some level processing of stimuli even when they are unattended.[43] However one major difference between neuropsychological symptoms such as neglect and extinction, and inattentional blindness concerns the role of expectation.[43] In inattentional blindness, subjects do not expect the unreported stimulus. In contrast, in neglect and extinction, patients may expect a stimulus to be presented on the affected side but still fail to report it when another it may be that expectation affects reportability but not the implicit processing of stimuli.[43]

Further explanations of the phenomenon of inattentional blindness include inattentional amnesia, inattentional agnosia and change blindness.

An explanation for this phenomenon is that observers see the critical object in their visual field but fail to process it extensively enough to retain it. Individuals experience inattentional agnosia after having seen the target stimuli but not consciously being able to identify what the stimuli is. It is possible that observers are not even able to identify that the stimuli they are seeing are coherent objects.[44] Thus observers perceive some representation of the stimuli but are actually unaware of what that stimulus is. It is because the stimulus is not encoded as a specific thing, that it later is not remembered. Individuals fail to report what the stimuli is after it has been removed. However, despite a lack in ability to fully process the stimuli, experiments have shown a priming effect of the critical stimuli. This priming effect indicates that the stimuli must have been processed to some degree, this occurs even if observers are unable to report what the stimuli is.[45]

Inattentional blindness is the failure to see a stimulus, such as an object that is present in a visual field. However, change blindness is the failure to notice something different about a visual display. Change blindness is a directly related to memory, individuals who experience the effects of change blindness fail to notice something different about a visual display from one moment to the next.[18] In experiments that test for this phenomenon participants are shown an image that is then followed by another duplicate image that has had a single change made to it. Participants are asked to compare and contrast the two images and identify what the change is. In inattentional blindness experiments, participants fail to identify some stimulus in a single display, a phenomenon that doesn't rely on memory the way change blindness does.[18] Inattentional blindness refers to an inability to identify an object all together whereas change blindness is a failure to compare a new image or display to one that was previously stored in memory.[18]

In 2006, Daniel Memmert conducted a series of studies in which he tested the how age and expertise of participants affect inattentional blindness. Using the gorilla video, he tested 6 different groups of participants. There were 2 groups of children (average age=7) half with no experience in basketball, and the other half with 2 years experience; 2 groups of juniors (average age=13) half with no experience in basketball, and the other half with 5 years of experience; and 2 groups of adults (average age = 24) half with no experience in basketball, the other half with over 12 years of experience. He then instructed all the groups to keep track of how many passes the people on the black team made.

Overall, the children with or without any basketball experience failed to perceive the gorilla more than the juniors or the adults. There were no significant difference between the inexperienced junior and adult groups, or between the experienced junior and adult groups.[39] This pattern of results suggests that until the approximate age of 13, presumably because certain aspects of cognition are still under development, inattentional blindness occurrences are more frequent, but become consistent throughout the remainder of the life span.

Additionally, the juniors with basketball experience noticed the gorilla significantly more than the juniors with no basketball experience; and the group of experienced adults noticed the gorilla significantly more than the non-experienced adults. This suggests that if one has had much experience with the stimuli in a visual field, they are more likely to consciously perceive the unexpected object.

In 2011, Elizabeth Graham and Deborah Burke conducted a study that assessed whether or not older adults are more susceptible to inattentional blindness than younger adults by having 51 younger-aged participants (17 to 22 years) and 61 older-aged participants (61 to 81 years) watch the classic gorilla video. Overall, they found that younger-aged participants were more likely to notice the unexpected gorilla than older-aged participants.[5]

In a 2015 study,[6] Cary Stothart, Walter Boot, and Daniel Simons attempted to replicate and extend the findings from both Graham and Burke's 2011 study and Steven Most and colleague's 2000 study[46] on Amazon Mechanical Turk using a sample of 515 participants that varied in age. In this study, participants were tasked with counting the number of times a number of white moving objects crossed the vertical midpoint of a display while ignoring a number of black moving objects. The unexpected object in this case was a gray cross that moved horizontally across the display at various distances from the vertical midpoint (this was manipulated between participants). Overall, they found that inattentional blindness susceptibility increases with age, which replicates the finding from Graham and Burke. In fact, they found that every 10 years of age was associated with a 1.3 fold increase in the probability of displaying inattentional blindness. They also found that the probability of inattentional blindness increases as the distance between the observer's focus of attention and the unexpected object increases, which replicates the finding from Most and colleagues. However, they also found that the relationship that age has with inattentional blindness does not change as a function of the unexpected object's distance from the focus of attention, suggesting that useful field of view does not mediate the relationship between age and inattentional blindness.

A series of studies conducted to test how similarity can influence the perception of a present stimulus. In the study, they asked participants to fixate on a central point on a computer screen and count how many times either white or black letters bounced off the edges of the screen. The first 2 trials did not contain an unexpected event, but the third trial was the critical trial in which a cross that had the same dimensions as the letters and varied in colour (white/light gray/dark gray/black) moved from the right side of the screen to the left side and passed through the central point. The results revealed the following: during the critical event, the more similar the colour of the cross was to the colour of the attended letters, the more likely the participants were to perceive it, and the less similar the colour of the cross was to the attended colour decreased the likelihood of the cross being noticed. For the participants attending to the black letters, 94% perceived the black cross; 44% perceived the dark gray cross; 12% perceived the light gray cross, and only 6% perceived the white cross. Similarly, if the participant was attending to the white letters, they were more likely to notice the cross it was white (94%) than if it was light gray (75%), dark gray (56%), or black (0%).[31] This study demonstrates that the more similar an unexpected object is to the attended object, the more likely it is to be perceived, thus reducing the chance of inattentional blindness.

A large experiment conducted on 794 participants by Schofield, Creswell and Denson[47] found evidence that completing a brief mindfulness exercise reduced rates on inattentional blindness, but did not improve the depth of encoding of the unexpected distractor. Participants in this experiment engaged in a guided-audio task of mindfully eating a raisin, a well-known task introduced by Kabat-Zinn in his mindfulness-based stress reduction program, or listened to factual descriptions about raisins. The audio recordings used to manipulate mindful states in this experiment are freely available online.[48] Participants who completed the raisin-eating task had 41% greater odds of noticing an unexpected red cross that floated across the screen. Participants were then asked to select the shape that had unexpectedly appeared (i.e., the red cross) out of a line-up of 3 red and 3 green shapes. Those in the mindfulness condition were no better than those in the control condition at selecting the red cross out of the line-up. This was true regardless of whether or not detection of the unexpected distractor was statistically controlled. This experiment demonstrated that not only does mindfulness affect inattentional blindness, but that detailed encoding of the unexpected distractor can be dissociated from the detection of the unexpected distractor.

The research that has been done on inattentional blindness suggests that there are four possible causes for this phenomenon. These include: conspicuity, mental workload, expectations, and capacity.[22]

Conspicuity refers to an object's ability to catch a person's attention. When something is conspicuous it is easily visible. There are two factors which determine conspicuity: sensory conspicuity and cognitive conspicuity. Sensory conspicuity factors are the physical properties an object has. If an item has bright colors, flashing lights, high contrast with environment, or other attention-grabbing physical properties it can attract a person's attention much easier. For example, people tend to notice objects that are bright colors or crazy patterns before they notice other objects. Cognitive conspicuity factors pertain to objects that are familiar to someone. People tend to notice objects faster if they have some meaning to their lives. For example, when a person hears his/her name, their attention is drawn to the person who said it. The cocktail party effect describes the cognitive conspicuity factor as well. When an object isn't conspicuous, it is easier to be inattentionally blind to it. People tend to notice items if they capture their attention in some way. If the object isn't visually prominent or relevant, there is a higher chance that a person will miss it.

Mental workload is a person's cognitive resources. The amount of a person's workload can interfere with processing of other stimuli. When a person focuses a lot of attention on one stimulus, he/she focuses less attention on other stimuli. For example, talking on the phone while driving the attention is mostly focused on the phone conversation, so there is less attention focused on driving. The mental workload could be anything from thinking about tasks that need to be done to tending to a baby in the backseat. When people have most of their attention focused on one thing, they are more vulnerable to inattentional blindness. However, the opposite is true as well. When a person has a very small mental workload he/she is doing an everyday task the task becomes automatic. Automatic processing can lessen one's mental workload, which can lead to a person to missing the unexpected stimuli.

Working memory also contributes to inattentional blindness. Cognitive psychologists have examined the relationship between working memory and inattention, but evidence is inconclusive. The rate of this phenomenon can be impacted by a number of factors. Researchers have found evidence for a number of components that may play a role. These include features of the object and the current task, where an individual's attention lies relative to the object, and mental workload as mentioned above. Researchers Kreitz, Furley, and Memmery in 2015, asserted that working memory capacity is not an indicator of susceptibility to inattentional blindness. Instead, it is a combination of what stimulus the attention is directed to as well as the individual's personal expectations. There are individual differences that can play a role, but some argue those disparities are separate from capacity for working memory.[49] On the other hand, there are researchers who consider differences between individuals and their working memory capacity to be a stronger determinant of inattentional blindness. Seegmiller, Watson, and Strayer in 2011 for example, studied individual differences in working memory capacity and how that overall impacted their attention on a given task. They utilized the same Invisible Gorilla video Simons and Chabris did (as mentioned above), but they additionally had participants complete a mathematics test to measure their capacity. From their results, they were able to find a high correlation between an individual's working memory capacity and their susceptibility to inattentional blindness. Those who were calculated to have a lower capacity, more often experienced the blindness.[50]

In a follow up study the same year, Kreitz and her team looked specifically at the cognitive abilities between individuals. Her team employed a variety of tasks, both static and dynamic, to compare the participants who had their cognitive capacity measured beforehand. Even though they included different tasks to test individuals, there was not a measurable relationship between the cognitive abilities of a participant and their attention performance. They did, however, find evidence to support the idea that noticing a certain stimuli was better in those demonstrating expertise in the task subject (referenced above). Overall, Kreitz concluded that cognitive/working memory capacity might not be an accurate measure for inattentional blindness. Instead, they determined that the rate of noticing might be both circumstantial and dependent on the requirements of the task.[51]

There are also researchers who subscribe to the idea that working memory does not play a measurable role in attentional blindness. This is different from the study by Kreitz and her team finding that individual differences in cognitive abilities might not be relative to noticing rates. Bredemeier and Simons conducted two studies in 2012. The first involved identifying the location of letters as well as counting how many times a group of shapes touched one another. These served as spatial and attention tasks respectively. The second study utilized the same tasks as the previous, but included a verbal one. Participants had to solve math problems and then remember a particular letter that followed each equation. From their results, the two researchers questioned if there was a relationship between noticing a particular stimuli and cognitive abilities. Instead of other factors contributing to the working memory of an individual's noticing, Bredemeier and Simons postulated that external variables establish the appearance of this relationship. Finally, the two researchers attempted to explain why studies were yielding conflicting results. The reason for why this research seems particularly inconclusive might be a result of disparities between the design of the actual research. Essentially, a variety of confounded variables might be prevalent across the studies when considering methodology and sampling processes. A more regulated, large-scale experiment could lead to more conclusive findings.[52]

When a person expects certain things to happen, he/she tends to block out other possibilities. This can lead to inattentional blindness. For example, person X is looking for their friend at a concert, and that person knows their friend (person Y) was wearing a yellow jacket. In order to find person Y, person X looks around for people wearing yellow. It is easier to pick a color out of the crowd than a person. However, if person Y took off the jacket, there is a chance person X could walk right past person Y and not notice because he/she was looking for the yellow jacket. Because of expectations, experts are more prone to inattentional blindness than beginners. An expert knows what to expect when certain situations arise. Therefore, that expert will know what to look for. This could cause that person to miss out on other important details that he/she may not have been looking for.

Attentional capacity, or neurological salience, is a measure of how much attention must be focused to complete a task. For example, an expert pianist can play a piano without thinking much, but a beginner would have to consciously think of every note they hit. This capacity can be lessened by drugs, alcohol, fatigue, and age. With a small capacity, it is more possible to miss things. Therefore, if a person is drunk, he/she will probably miss more than a sober person would. If your attentional capacity is large, you are less likely to experience inattentional blindness.

William James addressed the benefits of attention by saying, "Only those items which I notice shape my mind without selective interest, experience is utter chaos".[53] Humans have a limited mental capacity that is incapable of attending to all the sights, sounds and other inputs that rush the senses every moment. Inattentional blindness is beneficial in the sense that it is a mechanism that has evolved with attention to help filter out irrelevant input, allowing only important information to reach consciousness.[53] Several researchers, notably James J. Gibson, have argued that, even before the retina, perception begins in the ecology, which has turned perceptual processes into informational relationships in the environment through evolution.[54] This allows humans to focus our limited mental resources more efficiently in our environment. For example, New et al. maintain that survival required monitoring animals, both human and non-human, to become part of the evolutionary adaptiveness of the human species. They found that when participants were shown an image with a rapidly altering scene where the scene change included an animate or inanimate object that the participants were significantly better at identifying humans and animals. New et al. argue that better performance in detecting animals and humans is not a factor of acquired expertise, rather it is an evolved survival mechanism in human perception.[54]

Inattentional blindness is also beneficial as a response to advertising overload.[55] Irrelevant marketing makes it more likely for consumers to ignore initiatives that aim at capturing their attention. This phenomenon called 'purposeful blindness' has a compelling illustration regarding banner ads. Banner blindness shows that consumers can adopt fast and become good at ignoring marketing messages that are not relevant.

Although the bulk of inattentional blindness research has been conducted in laboratory studies, the phenomenon occurs in a variety of everyday contexts. Depending upon the context, the occurrence of inattentional blindness could range from embarrassing and/or humorous to potentially devastating.

Several recent studies of explicit attention capture have found that when observers are focused on some other object or event, they often experience inattentional blindness.[26] This finding has potentially tragic implications for distracted driving. If a person's attention is focused elsewhere while driving, carrying on a conversation or text messaging, for example, they could fail to notice salient and distinctive objects, such as a stop sign, which could lead to serious injury and possibly even death. There have also been heinous incidents attributed to inattentional blindness behind the wheel. For example, a Pennsylvania highway crew accidentally paved over a dead deer that was lying on the road. When questioned regarding their actions, the workers claimed to have never seen it.[30]

Many policies are being implemented around the world to decrease the competition for explicit attention capture while operating a vehicle. For example, there are legislative efforts in many countries aimed at banning or restricting the use of cell phones while driving. Research has shown that the use of both hands-free and hand-held cellular devices while driving results in the failure of attention to explicitly capture other salient and distinctive objects, leading to significantly delayed reaction times, as well as inattentional blindness.[56] A study published in 1997, based on accident data in Toronto, found the risk involved in driving while using a cell phone to be similar to that of driving drunk. In both cases, the risk of a collision was three to six times higher compared to a sober driver not using a cell phone.[57] Moreover, Strayer et al. (2006) found that when controlling for driving difficulty and time on task, cell-phone drivers exhibited greater impairment than intoxicated drivers, using a high-fidelity driving simulator.[58]

Inattentional blindness is also prevalent in aviation. The development of heads-up display (HUD) for pilots, which projects information onto the windshield or onto a helmet-mounted display, has enabled pilots to keep their eyes on the windshield, but simulator studies have found that HUD may cause runway incursion accidents, where one plane collides with another on the runway.[53] This finding is particularly concerning because HUDs are being employed in automobiles, which could lead to potential roadway incursions.[53] When a particular object or event captures attention to the extent to which the beholders' attentional capacity is completely absorbed, the resulting inattentional blindness has been known to cause dramatic accidents. For example, an airliner crew, engrossed with a blinking console light, failed to notice the approaching ground and register hearing the danger alarm sounding before the airliner crashed.[53]

Collaborative efforts to establish links between science and illusion have examined the relationship of the processes underlying inattentional blindness and the concept of misdirectiona magician's ability to manipulate attention in order to prevent his/her audience from seeing how a trick was performed. In several misdirection studies, including Kuhn and Tatler (2005),[59] participants watch a "vanishing item" magic trick. After the initial trial, participants are shown the trick until they detect the item dropping from the magician's hand. Most participants see the item drop on the second trial. The critical analyses involved differences in eye movements between the detected and undetected trials. These repetition trials are similar to the full-attention trial in the inattentional blindness paradigm, as both involve the detection of the unexpected event and, by detecting the unexpected event on the second trial, demonstrate that the event is readily perceivable.[60]

The main difference between inattentional blindness and misdirection involves how attention is manipulated. While inattentional blindness tasks require an explicit distractor, the attentional distraction in misdirection occurs through the implicit yet systematic orchestration of attention.[60] Moreover, there are several varieties of misdirection and different types are likely to induce different cognitive and perceptual processes, which vary the misdirection paradigm's resemblance to inattentional blindness.[60]

Although the aims of magic and illusion differ from those of neuroscience, magicians wish to exploit cognitive weaknesses, whereas neuroscientists seek to understand the brain and the neuronal significance of cognitive functions. Several researchers have argued that neuroscientists and psychologists can learn from incorporating the real world experience and knowledge of magicians into their fields of research. The techniques developed over centuries of stage magic by magicians may also be utilized by neuroscience as powerful probes of human cognition.[61]

When a police officer's version of events differs from video or forensic evidence, inattentional blindness has been used by defense lawyers as a possibility.[62] The criticism of this defense is that this view could be used to defend nearly any police shooting.[63]

See original here:
Inattentional blindness - Wikipedia

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

With river blindness, ‘you never sleep’ – CNN

♫ Wednesday, December 19th, 2018

' : ""},a.getDefinedParams = function(n, e) {return e.filter((function(e) {return n[e]})).reduce((function(e, t) {return r(e, (function(e, t, n) {t in e ? Object.defineProperty(e, t, {value: n,enumerable: !0,configurable: !0,writable: !0}) : e[t] = n;return e})({}, t, n[t]))}), {})},a.isValidMediaTypes = function(e) {var t = ["banner", "native", "video"];if (!Object.keys(e).every((function(e) {return (0,u.default)(t, e)})))return !1;if (e.video && e.video.context)return (0,u.default)(["instream", "outstream"], e.video.context);return !0},a.getBidderRequest = function(e, t, n) {return (0,o.default)(e, (function(e) {return 0 > t / 4).toString(16) : ([1e7] + -1e3 + -4e3 + -8e3 + -1e11).replace(/[018]/g, e)},a.getBidIdParameter = function(e, t) {return t && t[e] ? t[e] : ""},a.tryAppendQueryString = function(e, t, n) {return n ? e + (t + "=") + encodeURIComponent(n) + "&" : e},a.parseQueryStringParameters = function(e) {var t = "";for (var n in e)e.hasOwnProperty(n) && (t += n + "=" + encodeURIComponent(e[n]) + "&");return t},a.transformAdServerTargetingObj = function(t) {return t && 0 ';return t += ''},a.createTrackPixelIframeHtml = function(e) {var t = !(1 n ') : ""},a.getIframeDocument = function(e) {if (e) {var t = void 0;try {t = e.contentWindow ? e.contentWindow.document : e.contentDocument.document ? e.contentDocument.document : e.contentDocument} catch (e) {a.logError("Cannot get iframe document", e)}return t}},a.getValueString = function(e, t, n) {return null == t ? n : a.isStr(t) ? t : a.isNumber(t) ? t.toString() : void a.logWarn("Unsuported type for param: " + e + " required type: String")};a.getHighestCpm = U("timeToRespond", (function(e, t) {return t = u.syncsPerBidder)return c.logWarn('Number of user syncs exceeded for "' + t + '"');if (u.filterSettings) {if (function(e, t) {var n = u.filterSettings;if (function(e, t) {if (e.all && e[t])return c.logWarn('Detected presence of the "filterSettings.all" and "filterSettings.' + t + '" in userSync config. You cannot mix "all" with "iframe/image" configs; they are mutually exclusive.'),!1;var n = e.all ? e.all : e[t], r = e.all ? "all" : t;if (!n)return !1;var i = n.filter, o = n.bidders;if (i && "include" !== i && "exclude" !== i)return c.logWarn('UserSync "filterSettings.' + r + ".filter" setting '" + i + "' is not a valid option; use either 'include' or 'exclude'."),!1;return !!("*" === o || Array.isArray(o) && 0 n n n prebid.org wrappern n " + (n ? "" : "") + "n n n n "),ttlseconds: Number(e.ttl)}}},23: function(e, t) {var n = {}.toString;e.exports = function(e) {return n.call(e).slice(8, -1)}},24: function(e, t) {e.exports = function(e) {if (null == e)throw TypeError("Can't call method on " + e);return e}},25: function(e, t, n) {var r = n(60)("wks"), i = n(62), o = n(19).Symbol, a = "function" == typeof o;(e.exports = function(e) {return r[e] || (r[e] = a && o[e] || (a ? o : i)("Symbol." + e))}).store = r},26: function(e, t) {e.exports = function() {}},27: function(e, t, n) {"use strict";Object.defineProperty(t, "__esModule", {value: !0}),t.default = function(e) {var t = e;return {callBids: function() {},setBidderCode: function(e) {t = e},getBidderCode: function() {return t}}}},28: function(e, t, n) {"use strict";var r, i = n(7), o = (r = i) && r.__esModule ? r : {default: r}, a = (function(e) {{if (e && e.__esModule)return e;var t = {};if (null != e)for (var n in e)Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e, n) && (t[n] = e[n]);return t.default = e,t}})(n(0));var d = {}, u = ["criteo"];function s(e, t) {var n = document.createElement("script");n.type = "text/javascript",n.async = !0,t && "function" == typeof t && (n.readyState ? n.onreadystatechange = function() {"loaded" !== n.readyState && "complete" !== n.readyState || (n.onreadystatechange = null,t())}: n.onload = function() {t()}),n.src = e;var r = document.getElementsByTagName("head");(r = r.length ? r : document.getElementsByTagName("body")).length && (r = r[0]).insertBefore(n, r.firstChild)}t.loadExternalScript = function(e, t) {if (t && e)if ((0,o.default)(u, t)) {if (!d[e]) {a.logWarn("module " + t + " is loading external JavaScript");var n = document.createElement("script");n.type = "text/javascript",n.async = !0,n.src = e,a.insertElement(n),d[e] = !0}} else a.logError(t + " not whitelisted for loading external JavaScript");else a.logError("cannot load external script without url and moduleCode")},t.loadScript = function(t, e, n) {t ? n ? d[t] ? e && "function" == typeof e && (d[t].loaded ? e() : d[t].callbacks.push(e)) : (d[t] = {loaded: !1,callbacks: []},e && "function" == typeof e && d[t].callbacks.push(e),s(t, (function() {d[t].loaded = !0;try {for (var e = 0; e t.max ? e : t}), {max: 0}), p = (0,v.default)(e.buckets, (function(e) {if (n > g.max * r) {var t = e.precision;void 0 === t && (t = y),i = (e.max * r).toFixed(t)} else if (n = e.min * r)return e}));return p && (t = n,a = r,d = void 0 !== (o = p).precision ? o.precision : y,u = o.increment * a,s = o.min * a,c = Math.pow(10, d + 2),f = (t * c - s * c) / (u * c),l = Math.floor(f) * u + s,i = (l = Number(l.toFixed(10))).toFixed(d)),i}function m(e) {if (o.isEmpty(e) || !e.buckets || !Array.isArray(e.buckets))return !1;var t = !0;return e.buckets.forEach((function(e) {void 0 !== e.min && e.max && e.increment || (t = !1)})),t}t.getPriceBucketString = function(e, t) {var n = 2 (0,S.timestamp)()},function(e) {return e && (e.status && !(0,A.default)([C.BID_STATUS.BID_TARGETING_SET, C.BID_STATUS.RENDERED], e.status) || !e.status)});function U(e, n) {var r = [], i = (0,S.groupBy)(e, "adUnitCode");return Object.keys(i).forEach((function(e) {var t = (0,S.groupBy)(i[e], "bidderCode");Object.keys(t).forEach((function(e) {return r.push(t[e].reduce(n))}))})),r}function u(n) {var g = {};function p(e) {return "string" == typeof e ? [e] : w.isArray(e) ? e : n.getAdUnitCodes() || []}function v() {return U(n.getBidsReceived().filter((function(e) {return "banner" !== e.mediaType || (0,a.sizeSupported)([e.width, e.height])})).filter(d).filter(t.isBidNotExpired), S.getOldestHighestCpmBid)}function y() {return n.getStandardBidderAdServerTargeting().map((function(e) {return e.key})).concat(R).filter(S.uniques)}function m(r, i, e, t) {return Object.keys(i.adserverTargeting).filter(o()).forEach((function(e) {var t, n;r.length && r.filter((n = e,function(e) {return e.adUnitCode === i.adUnitCode && e.adserverTargeting[n]})).forEach((t = e,function(e) {w.isArray(e.adserverTargeting[t]) || (e.adserverTargeting[t] = [e.adserverTargeting[t]]),e.adserverTargeting[t] = e.adserverTargeting[t].concat(i.adserverTargeting[t]).filter(S.uniques),delete i.adserverTargeting[t]}))})),r.push(i),r}function o() {var t = y();return function(e) {return -1 === t.indexOf(e)}}function b(t) {return _({}, t.adUnitCode, Object.keys(t.adserverTargeting).filter(o()).map((function(e) {return _({}, e.substring(0, O), [t.adserverTargeting[e]])})))}return g.resetPresetTargeting = function(e) {if ((0,S.isGptPubadsDefined)()) {var t = p(e), r = n.getAdUnits().filter((function(e) {return (0,A.default)(t, e.code)}));window.googletag.pubads().getSlots().forEach((function(n) {B.forEach((function(t) {r.forEach((function(e) {e.code !== n.getAdUnitPath() && e.code !== n.getSlotElementId() || n.setTargeting(t, null)}))}))}))}},g.getAllTargeting = function(e) {var r, t, i, n, o, a, d, u, s, c = 1 i && (r = !1)),!r})),r && e.run(),r}function u(e, t) {void 0 === e[t] ? e[t] = 1 : e[t]++}},addWinningBid: function(e) {o = o.concat(e),R.callBidWonBidder(e.bidder, e, f)},setBidTargeting: function(e) {R.callSetTargetingBidder(e.bidder, e)},getWinningBids: function() {return o},getTimeout: function() {return E},getAuctionId: function() {return m},getAuctionStatus: function() {return b},getAdUnits: function() {return s},getAdUnitCodes: function() {return l},getBidRequests: function() {return g},getBidsReceived: function() {return p}}},t.auctionCallbacks = W,t.getStandardBidderSettings = d,t.getKeyValueTargetingPairs = V,t.adjustBids = s;var _ = n(0), h = n(31), i = n(17), S = n(228), E = n(12), w = n(3), r = n(18), o = n(20), T = a(n(10)), C = a(n(7)), A = n(41);function a(e) {return e && e.__esModule ? e : {default: e}}var B = r.userSync.syncUsers, O = n(0), R = n(8), U = n(9), N = n(4), D = t.AUCTION_STARTED = "started", j = t.AUCTION_IN_PROGRESS = "inProgress", P = t.AUCTION_COMPLETED = "completed";U.on(N.EVENTS.BID_ADJUSTMENT, (function(e) {s(e)}));var k = 4, x = {}, M = {}, G = [];var q = t.addBidResponse = (0,o.createHook)("asyncSeries", (function(e, t) {this.auctionAddBidResponse(e, t)}), "addBidResponse");function W(e, p) {var v = 0, t = !1, n = (0,_.delayExecution)((function() {t = !0}), p.getBidRequests().length);function y() {v--,t && 0 === v && e()}return {addBidResponse: function(e, t) {v++;var n = p.getBidRequests(), r = p.getAuctionId(), i = (0,_.getBidderRequest)(n, t.bidderCode, e), o = (function(e) {var t = e.adUnitCode, n = e.bid, r = e.bidRequest, i = e.auctionId, o = r.start, a = b({}, n, {auctionId: i,responseTimestamp: (0,_.timestamp)(),requestTimestamp: o,cpm: parseFloat(n.cpm) || 0,bidder: n.bidderCode,adUnitCode: t});a.timeToRespond = a.responseTimestamp - a.requestTimestamp,U.emit(N.EVENTS.BID_ADJUSTMENT, a);var d = r.bids && (0,T.default)(r.bids, (function(e) {return e.adUnitCode == t})), u = d && d.renderer;u && u.url && (a.renderer = E.Renderer.install({url: u.url}),a.renderer.setRender(u.render));var s, c = w.config.getConfig("mediaTypePriceGranularity." + n.mediaType), f = (0,h.getPriceBucketString)(a.cpm, "object" === (void 0 === c ? "undefined" : m(c)) ? c : w.config.getConfig("customPriceBucket"), w.config.getConfig("currency.granularityMultiplier"));return a.pbLg = f.low,a.pbMg = f.med,a.pbHg = f.high,a.pbAg = f.auto,a.pbDg = f.dense,a.pbCg = f.custom,a.bidderCode && (0 e.getTimeout() + w.config.getConfig("timeoutBuffer") && e.executeCallback(!0)}function z(e, t) {U.emit(N.EVENTS.BID_RESPONSE, t),e.addBidReceived(t),I(e, t)}function d(e) {var t = w.config.getConfig("mediaTypePriceGranularity." + e), n = "string" == typeof e && t ? "string" == typeof t ? t : "custom" : w.config.getConfig("priceGranularity"), r = pbjs.bidderSettings;return r[N.JSON_MAPPING.BD_SETTING_STANDARD] || (r[N.JSON_MAPPING.BD_SETTING_STANDARD] = {}),r[N.JSON_MAPPING.BD_SETTING_STANDARD][N.JSON_MAPPING.ADSERVER_TARGETING] || (r[N.JSON_MAPPING.BD_SETTING_STANDARD][N.JSON_MAPPING.ADSERVER_TARGETING] = [{key: N.TARGETING_KEYS.BIDDER,val: function(e) {return e.bidderCode}}, {key: N.TARGETING_KEYS.AD_ID,val: function(e) {return e.adId}}, {key: N.TARGETING_KEYS.PRICE_BUCKET,val: function(e) {return n === N.GRANULARITY_OPTIONS.AUTO ? e.pbAg : n === N.GRANULARITY_OPTIONS.DENSE ? e.pbDg : n === N.GRANULARITY_OPTIONS.LOW ? e.pbLg : n === N.GRANULARITY_OPTIONS.MEDIUM ? e.pbMg : n === N.GRANULARITY_OPTIONS.HIGH ? e.pbHg : n === N.GRANULARITY_OPTIONS.CUSTOM ? e.pbCg : void 0}}, {key: N.TARGETING_KEYS.SIZE,val: function(e) {return e.size}}, {key: N.TARGETING_KEYS.DEAL,val: function(e) {return e.dealId}}, {key: N.TARGETING_KEYS.SOURCE,val: function(e) {return e.source}}, {key: N.TARGETING_KEYS.FORMAT,val: function(e) {return e.mediaType}}]),r[N.JSON_MAPPING.BD_SETTING_STANDARD]}function V(e, t) {if (!t)return {};var n = {}, r = pbjs.bidderSettings;r && (u(n, d(t.mediaType), t),e && r[e] && r[e][N.JSON_MAPPING.ADSERVER_TARGETING] && (u(n, r[e], t),t.sendStandardTargeting = r[e].sendStandardTargeting));return t.native && (n = b({}, n, (0,i.getNativeTargeting)(t))),n}function u(r, i, o) {var e = i[N.JSON_MAPPING.ADSERVER_TARGETING];return o.size = o.getSize(),O._each(e, (function(e) {var t = e.key, n = e.val;if (r[t] && O.logWarn("The key: " + t + " is getting ovewritten"),O.isFn(n))try {n = n(o)} catch (e) {O.logError("bidmanager", "ERROR", e)}(void 0 === i.suppressEmptyKeys || !0 !== i.suppressEmptyKeys) && t !== N.TARGETING_KEYS.DEAL || !O.isEmptyStr(n) && null != n ? r[t] = n : O.logInfo("suppressing empty key '" + t + "' from adserver targeting")})),r}function s(e) {var t = e.bidderCode, n = e.cpm, r = void 0;if (pbjs.bidderSettings && (t && pbjs.bidderSettings[t] && "function" == typeof pbjs.bidderSettings[t].bidCpmAdjustment ? r = pbjs.bidderSettings[t].bidCpmAdjustment : pbjs.bidderSettings[N.JSON_MAPPING.BD_SETTING_STANDARD] && "function" == typeof pbjs.bidderSettings[N.JSON_MAPPING.BD_SETTING_STANDARD].bidCpmAdjustment && (r = pbjs.bidderSettings[N.JSON_MAPPING.BD_SETTING_STANDARD].bidCpmAdjustment),r))try {n = r(e.cpm, b({}, e))} catch (e) {O.logError("Error during bid adjustment", "bidmanager.js", e)}0 (eg mediaTypes.banner.sizes)."), e.sizes = n);if (t && t.video) {var i = t.video;if (i.playerSize)if (Array.isArray(i.playerSize) && 1 === i.playerSize.length && i.playerSize.every(d)) e.sizes = i.playerSize;else if (d(i.playerSize)) {var o = [];o.push(i.playerSize),w.logInfo("Transforming video.playerSize from " + i.playerSize + " to " + o + " so it's in the proper format."),e.sizes = i.playerSize = o} else w.logError("Detected incorrect configuration of mediaTypes.video.playerSize. Please specify only one set of dimensions in a format like: [[640, 480]]. Removing invalid mediaTypes.video.playerSize property from request."), delete e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize}if (t && t.native) {var a = t.native;a.image && a.image.sizes && !Array.isArray(a.image.sizes) && (w.logError("Please use an array of sizes for native.image.sizes field. Removing invalid mediaTypes.native.image.sizes property from request."),delete e.mediaTypes.native.image.sizes),a.image && a.image.aspect_ratios && !Array.isArray(a.image.aspect_ratios) && (w.logError("Please use an array of sizes for native.image.aspect_ratios field. Removing invalid mediaTypes.native.image.aspect_ratios property from request."),delete e.mediaTypes.native.image.aspect_ratios),a.icon && a.icon.sizes && !Array.isArray(a.icon.sizes) && (w.logError("Please use an array of sizes for native.icon.sizes field. Removing invalid mediaTypes.native.icon.sizes property from request."),delete e.mediaTypes.native.icon.sizes)}})),e},h.callBids = function(e, t, r, i, o, a) {if (t.length) {var n = t.reduce((function(e, t) {return e[Number(void 0 !== t.src && t.src === C.S2S.SRC)].push(t),e}), [[], []]), d = b(n, 2), u = d[0], s = d[1];if (s.length) {var c = (0,E.ajaxBuilder)(a, o ? {request: o.request.bind(null, "s2s"),done: o.done} : void 0), f = U.bidders, l = R[U.adapter], g = s[0].tid, p = s[0].adUnitsS2SCopy;if (l) {var v = {tid: g,ad_units: p};if (v.ad_units.length) {var y = s.map((function(e) {return e.start = (0,S.timestamp)(),i})), m = v.ad_units.reduce((function(e, t) {return e.concat((t.bids || []).reduce((function(e, t) {return e.concat(t.bidder)}), []))}), []);w.logMessage("CALLING S2S HEADER BIDDERS ==== " + f.filter((function(e) {return (0,A.default)(m, e)})).join(",")),s.forEach((function(e) {B.emit(C.EVENTS.BID_REQUESTED, e)})),l.callBids(v, s, r, (function() {return y.forEach((function(e) {return e()}))}), c)}}}u.forEach((function(e) {e.start = (0,S.timestamp)();var t = R[e.bidderCode];w.logMessage("CALLING BIDDER ======= " + e.bidderCode),B.emit(C.EVENTS.BID_REQUESTED, e);var n = (e.doneCbCallCount = 0,E.ajaxBuilder)(a, o ? {request: o.request.bind(null, e.bidderCode),done: o.done} : void 0);t.callBids(e, r, i, n)}))} else w.logWarn("callBids executed with no bidRequests. Were they filtered by labels or sizing?")},h.videoAdapters = [],h.registerBidAdapter = function(e, t) {var n = (2 n

See the article here:
With river blindness, 'you never sleep' - CNN

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

End Times – Life, Hope & Truth

♫ Friday, November 30th, 2018

Who is he? What does this strange-sounding term mean? How can you avoid being a victim of the end-time Antichrists deception?

God is the only One who can predict the futureand make His predictions come true. What does He want you to know about Bible prophecies of the end times?

The religious leaders of Jesus day asked Him for a miraculous sign, but He chided them for not discerning the signs of the times. What did He mean? Can we discern them?

Doomsday prophets always talk about the end of the world. What does the Bible really say about end-time prophecy? And why is Gods message called good news?

Many people have heard of the four horsemen of the Apocalypse, but not as many really know what they are. What do they tell us about end times prophecy?

Many believe when Jesus returns, He will approach secretly to snatch away all believers and children in a rapture to protect them. Is this biblical?

Many people describe the final battle at the end of the world as the battle of Armageddon. But is that really what the Bible teaches?

What did Jeremiah mean by the time of Jacobs trouble? How does this unequaled time of trouble for Israels descendants relate to the Great Tribulation?

Russia always seems to find its way into the middle of world affairs. Historically, who are the Russians? Do they have a role to play in biblical prophecy?

The Bible says that Jesus is going to come back to earth. But given all the advancements in our modern world, is Christs second coming really necessary?

Jesus knew that we would want to know when He is coming back. He wants us to eagerly await that day! But does He want us to know exactly when He will return?

The world desperately needs the return of Christ. But the Bible warns there will be conflicting messages about when and where He will return. Whats the truth?

God will use supernatural heavenly signs to signal the beginning of His intervention to punish humanity for our sinsand to rescue us from self-destruction.

Fluctuations in the world economy have plagued mankind for thousands of years. Why do economic crises happen? Is there a biblical solution?

Jesus Christ pointed out the importance of understanding the signs of the times. Why did He say this, and what are the warning signs of the end times?

Why do we have the WorldWatch section in Discern? What does the Bible tell us to watch, and how do we choose which news items and trends to share?

Just before He returns, Christ says, the earth will be dominated by gentile nations. Who are these gentiles, and what will be the result of their influence?

The Bible speaks of wonderful future times of comfort and joy. When will these times of refreshing be, and how can true believers experience them?

Bible prophecy foretells the times of restoration of all things. What will be restored to its former state? When will this longed-for renewal occur?

Jesus said that end-time events would parallel those in the days before Sodom and Gomorrahs destruction. What were those conditions, and why is it important?

Jesus Christ said that end-time events would be like those during the time of Noah. What were those conditions like, and why should we be concerned?

Earthquakes have caused widespread destruction and the deaths of millions of people. What does the Bible say about earthquakes in the end times? How should we respond?

The Bible describes terrible end-time plagues on the earths water systems; but after Jesus Christs return, fresh water will bring life even to barren lands.

What is happening to our water supplies? Will shortages affect our health, economy and lead to more conflict? What does the Bible say about future water woes?

Many wars have been fought since World War II. Has man learned how to avoid world war or are we living on borrowed time? Does the Bible predict World War III?

In spite of our unquenchable optimism, the solution to our brokenness is out of reach. Its going to take far more than elbow grease to fix the mess weve made.

Millions of people are feverishly preparing for the end of the world as we know it. Many of the fears are real. But is there a better way to prepare?

There is so much bad news today, good news can seem unbelievable or at least overblown. But utopia is realand its coming soon.

Terrifying curses were pronounced millennia ago, and their effects are being felt to this day. Why? And how will they finally be removed?

Thanksgiving and its opposite dont seem that important to most people. But God looks at things differently. Ingratitude is one of the symptoms of society on the brink.

As concerns over weapons of mass destruction (WMD) escalate, what does the Bible say about end-time events in which these devices may be used?

As corruption, violence and evil increase, our world teeters on the brink of self-destruction. Jesus Christs promise to come again offers our only real hope.

In the last days, the Bible warns of times of stress that can turn people cold as ice. Consider four points to help keep your love from growing cold.

On the Mount of Olives Jesus answered His disciples questions about the temple and end-time events. His prophecy remains a vital message for today.

Why is the world facing epidemic after epidemic of new and reemerging infectious diseases? What are we doing wrong, and how will the ultimate healing come?

How close are we to the end of the world? Is it even possible to know?

Unrest, war, poverty and extreme ideological divides are multiplying around the globe. How did we get in this mess? Is there a way out?

View original post here:
End Times - Life, Hope & Truth

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

Messiah’s Message: Repent – Life, Hope & Truth

♫ Friday, November 30th, 2018

The first two statements of explanation that Jesus gave as He preached the gospel of the Kingdom of GodThe time is fulfilled and the kingdom of God is at handwere covered in previous articles in this series. We now come to the first of the two commands Jesus issued: Repent (Mark 1:15).

In the previous article we noted that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God (1 Corinthians 15:50). Our human body must be changed to a spiritual body (verse 44) if we are to be part of this Kingdom.

Obeying Christs command to repent is the first step in the process that prepares us for change from flesh and blood to spirit. This change is necessary in order for us to become members of Gods immortal family and rulers within His eternal Kingdom (John 1:12; Revelation 1:6; 5:10).

Encouraging people to repent of their sins was an integral part of the gospel Jesus preached. Commenting on two occasions where people had lost their lives, Jesus said, I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish (Luke 13:3, 5, emphasis added throughout). Later, He began to rebuke the cities in which most of His mighty works had been done, because they did not repent (Matthew 11:20).

The historical record shows that the disciples Jesus trained also preached that people should repent (Mark 6:12). As Peter explained, repentance and then baptism were the initial steps Christians must take when they respond to the gospel (Acts 2:38).

The Greek word that is translated repent in the New Testament means to change ones way of life as the result of a complete change of thought and attitude with regard to sin and righteousness (J.P. Louw and Eugene Nida, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains, 1988). A person who repents realizes that he or she has been sinningbreaking Gods holy and beneficial lawand that he or she needs to change.

Key Steps in Repentance

What specific steps must one take in order to repent? The Bible reveals several actions that are integral to this important process:

Admit to God that you have sinned. Although Scripture teaches that everyone has sinned (Romans 3:23), we do not like to personally acknowledge that we have broken Gods holy and beneficial law. Hard as it is, this fundamental act is the first step we must take in order to repent.

Ask God for help. Although we like to think we can do anything we set our minds to, the truth iswe need Gods assistance in order to repent. Repentance is a gift from God (2 Timothy 2:25). He is the One who leads people to repentance (Romans 2:4).

Start living in accordance with Gods laws. Our natural, carnal nature does not want to obey God, but we must rule over this rebellious nature and keep Gods commandments (Romans 8:7, 13; Matthew 19:17).

Continue to repent. Even after we are baptized and receive the Holy Spirit, we still occasionally sin. When we do, we must confess our sins to God (1 John 1:7-10) and determine not to continue in them (Romans 6:1-2).

For further study on the actions involved in repentance, see the article How to Repent.

The calling and stimulus for wanting to repentto change our livescomes from God the Father (John 6:44). As Paul wrote to members at Rome, Do you despise the riches of His goodness, forbearance, and longsuffering, not knowing that the goodness of God leads you to repentance? (Romans 2:4).

Although the realization of our need to change may come in various waysa key moment in life, a time of contemplation, hearing a specific message, the example of a friendit is always marked by a change of heartthat is, our way of thinking (Acts 2:37). Instead of ignoring Gods instructions as we had been doing, the primary focus in our lives becomes earnestly learning Gods law and living in accordance with it. Gods way of life is now our life. We love Gods instructions and want to do what He expects of us (1 John 5:3).

Understanding that a dramatic change in thinking occurs when people repent of their sins, some have referred to this event as giving your heart to the Lord. And while our hearts are indeed at the center of thisprocess, we must also understand that repentance is far more than simply an emotional moment. When we truly repent, we will also act differentlythat is, by living righteouslyand we will continue living righteously for the remainder of our lives.

Genuine repentance is not a one-time event. It is an ongoing way of thinking and living in accordance with Gods instructions found in His Wordthe Holy Bible.

If we are going to obey Jesus command to repent, we must also understand what He expects us to repent of. The obvious answer is that we must repent of our sinsthe times we have broken or ignored Gods law. As Peter told the crowd in Jerusalem, Repent therefore and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out (Acts 3:19).

The Bible says sin is lawlessness, specifically meaning transgressing Gods laws (1 John 3:4). In light of this, what would have been some of the sins Christ commanded the people of the first century and us today to repent of? Here are a few sins to consider.

Sadly, many within mainstream Christianity no longerunderstand what sin is. Many teach or condone some of the things Jesus expects people to repent of. The honorable traits of tolerance, love and respect have been so distorted and misapplied that many now think Jesus approves of the very things that were sins in the first century and that continue to be sins today.

Though their hearts and emotions may indeed be touched by the Messiahs message, too many have mistakenly continued living in opposition to Gods teaching. Those who neglect or fail to understand this more complete understanding of repentancethat it includes our minds and our obedience to Gods instructions in the Bibleare not properly responding to the Messiahs command to repent.

God hasnt changed His mind about what is and isnt sin (Malachi 3:6; Hebrews 13:8). In order to truly repent, we must accept Gods definitions of sin and then alter our conduct accordingly.

While our hearts are indeed at the center of this process, we must also understand that repentance is far more than simply an emotional moment.

The biblical response to real, genuine repentance is baptism. As Peter told the crowd gathered in Jerusalem on the Day of Pentecost in A.D. 31, Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:38).

Baptism represents our sins being washed away (Acts 22:16). The Holy Spirit helps us understand Gods timeless instruction in spite of religious confusion in the world around us (John 16:13; 1 John 5:19). This power from God (Luke 24:49) strips away spiritual blindness (2 Corinthians 3:14-16; Ephesians 4:18); and when we receive it via baptism, it identifies us as children of God (Romans 8:9, 14, 16).

In addition to these wonderful benefits of having Gods Spirit, there is still another important blessing that God extends when His Spirit is present within us. It is the guarantee of receiving eternal life. As Paul wrote, But if the Spirit of Him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, He who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through His Spirit (Romans 8:11).

The new life we will receive will be eternal. As Paul further explained, this life will come when we are changed from natural bodies formed from the dust of the earth to ones that are immortal and similar to God in composition (1 Corinthians 15:35-53; 1 John 3:1-2).

Repenting of our sins and being baptized for the forgiveness of those sins so we can receive the Holy Spirit are thus necessary steps for us to enter the Kingdom of God. Again, as Jesus stated, Unless you repent you will all likewise perish (Luke 13:3).

In the concluding article in this series we will examine Christs command to believe in the gospel (Mark 1:15).

For further study on repentance, see the Life Hope & Truth article What Is Repentance? and the ones in the section on baptism.

Go here to see the original:
Messiah's Message: Repent - Life, Hope & Truth

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

Color Blindness Tests Colblindor

♫ Wednesday, November 21st, 2018

Many people are looking for a possibility to test their color vision on the web. Unfortunately there arent many color blindness tests available online. So this page shall bring together a series of tests to check your personal type of color vision deficiency and the severity of it.

Please be aware that your personal computer display settings, ambient light and other factors can affect your test result. If you want to get an accurate diagnosis of your color vision deficiency, please visit your local eye specialist.

The often called Ishihara plates were introduced by Dr. Shinobu Ishihara from Japan long time ago. Since then this test is the most well known all around the world.

This test consists of 38 different pseudoisochromatic plates. Each of them hides a number or line behind colorful dots. Based on what you can see and what not, it is possible to check if you are suffering from some form of red-green color blindness.

As the test is usually executed in a booklet, it is not the best possibility to online test your type and severity of color blindness. Other tests like the arrangement tests below show better results.

This famous color vision testwhich is based on 88 colored plates and not 100 as the name suggestwas introduced in 1943 by Farnsworth.

The test will show you four batches of 22 mixed colored plates. What you have to do is to arrange the for rows of plates in a correct order. Thats all.

All misplacements will be summed up to your personal total error score. The higher your TES is, the more severely colorblind you are. On the other hand you can also get some information on the type of your color vision deficiency based on the area around your biggest error points.

In 1947 Farnsworth released the D-15 dichotomous test. This is to this day one of the most famous color vision deficiency test and definitely the most famous color arrangement test.

You simply have to arrange the given colors in the correct order of colors. If you are suffering from some form of color blindness, you will arrange them quite differently compared to persons with normal color vision.

With this test is not only possible to check the type of your color vision deficiency but also its severity. Unfortunately the test results are not completely reliable, which is a base problem for all types of online color vision tests. But the result will be a good indicator of your correct color vision abilities, specially if you take it under different conditions.

This is my first try to develop a simple red-green color blindness test. It is based on the idea of the real anomaloscope, made from two different light sources which have to be brought to a match.

Just match the left color to the right one using the slider below the box. If you can match several of them you are definitely red-green colorblind. Originally I wanted to retrieve more detailed information from the test results. But it didnt work outyet.

More:
Color Blindness Tests Colblindor

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

Blindness – kidshealth.org

♫ Monday, September 24th, 2018

Have you ever put on a blindfold and pretended that you couldn't see? You probably bumped into things and got confused about which way you were going. But if you had to, you could get adjusted and learn to live without your sight.

Lots of people have done just that. They have found ways to learn, play, and work, even though they have trouble seeing or can't see at all.

Your eyes and your brain work together to see. The eye is made up of many different parts, including the cornea, iris, lens, and retina. These parts all work together to focus on light and images. Your eyes then use special nerves to send what you see to your brain, so your brain can process and recognize what you're seeing. In eyes that work correctly, this process happens almost instantly.

When this doesn't work the way it should, a person may be visually impaired, or blind. The problem may affect one eye or both eyes.

When you think of being blind, you might imagine total darkness. But most people who are blind can still see a little light or shadows. They just can't see things clearly. People who have some sight, but still need a lot of help, are sometimes called "legally blind."

Vision problems can develop before a baby is born. Sometimes, parts of the eyes don't form the way they should. A kid's eyes might look fine, but the brain has trouble processing the information they send. The optic nerve sends pictures to the brain, so if the nerve doesn't form correctly, the baby's brain won't receive the messages needed for sight.

Blindness can be genetic (or inherited), which means that this problem gets passed down to a kid from parents through genes.

Blindness also can be caused by an accident, if something hurts the eye. That's why it's so important to protect your eyes when you play certain sports, such as hockey.

Some illnesses, such as diabetes, can damage a person's vision over time. Other eye diseases, such as cataracts (say: KAH-tuh-rakts), can cause vision problems or blindness, but they usually affect older people.

A kid who has serious trouble with vision might see an ophthalmologist (say: af-thal-MAH-luh-jist), a doctor who specializes in eye problems. Even babies might see an ophthalmologist if their parents think they might be having trouble seeing.

At the doctor visit, the doctor will talk with the parents and the kid (if the kid is old enough to describe what's going on). A doctor might use an eye chart to find out how well the kid can see. You've probably seen these charts that contain letters of different sizes. It's a way of testing how well a person can see. Someone with really good vision would be able to read certain letters from 20 feet (6 meters) away.

Eyesight this good is called 20/20 vision, although some people can see even better than that. The numbers change depending on how clearly a person can see. The larger or closer something needs to be in order for it to be seen, the worse a person's vision is.

Many times, glasses or contact lenses are all that's needed to help kids see better. But if glasses and contact lenses can't make someone's vision any better and the person needs to get really close to something to see it he or she may be considered blind. For instance, someone with good vision might be able to see an object from 200 feet (61 meters) away, but someone is considered blind if he or she needs to be 20 feet (6 meters) away to see the same object.

Babies and little kids won't be able to use the eye chart, but doctors can check their vision by doing special vision tests or something as simple as putting a toy in front of the child to see if he or she can focus on it.

The ophthalmologist also will examine the kid's eyes using special medication and lighting that allows him or her to see into the eyeballs. The ophthalmologist will look at each part of the eye to check for problems, such as a cataract (cloudiness of the eye's lens). Once the doctor knows what's causing the vision problem, he or she can begin planning how to treat it.

In some cases, an operation can help improve a kid's vision. For example, if a kid has a cataract, doctors may do surgery to remove it.

A baby who is blind can still learn and develop normally. But the baby's parents will need the help of specialists who know how to help blind children. It's often a great idea for the child to attend special learning programs designed just for little kids who have trouble seeing. These programs would make the most of the senses that the kid does have, such as touch, hearing, smell, and taste.

Touch comes in handy when a child is older and wants to read books. Kids who are visually impaired can learn to read by using a special system called braille. Braille is a way of expressing letters, words, and thoughts. To read braille, a person feels a series of little bumps that are associated with letters in the alphabet. For instance, "A" is represented as one bump. Computer programs and other devices that can "see" turn the words on a page into braille.

Hearing is another important sense if a kid has vision problems. Some devices can read out loud what's written on a page. With special equipment, a visually impaired kid can read almost anything. These kinds of technologies can be helpful in learning. Kids who are blind might attend a special school, or they might attend regular classes, aided by special devices and specialists.

Kids who have vision problems will get help from their parents, doctors, and teachers. When they are older, some of them may get a hand or should we say a paw? from a guide dog. These helper dogs are trained to be a blind person's eyes. That means the dog learns to be very alert to surroundings so he or she can be a good guide for the person.

Not only are these dogs great friends, they give blind people independence, so they can accomplish what they want to accomplish.

Many blind people have gone on to do amazing things in many different fields, including music, the arts, and even sports. Serious vision problems didn't stop runner Marla Runyan. She was the first legally blind person to ever qualify for the Olympics!

Date reviewed: September 2016

Read the rest here:
Blindness - kidshealth.org

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

AARP’s Health Tools

♫ Tuesday, August 28th, 2018

Blindness is the inability to see anything, even light. Ifyoure partially blind, you have limited vision. For example, you may haveblurry vision or the inability to distinguish the shapes of objects. Completeblindness means that you cant see at all and are in total darkness. Legalblindness refers to vision thats highly compromised. What a person withhealthy eyes can see from 200 feet away a legally blind person can see onlyfrom 20 feet away.

Seek medical attention right away if you suddenly lose theability to see. Have someone bring you to the emergency room for treatment. Dontwait for your vision to return. Depending on the cause of your blindness,immediate treatment may increase your chances of restoring your vision.Treatment may involve surgery or medication.

If youre completely blind, you can see nothing. If yourepartially blind, you might experience the following symptoms:

Your childs visual system begins to develop in the womb,but it wont be fully formed until about 2 years of age. By 6 to 8 weeks ofage, your baby should be able to fix their gaze on an object and follow itsmovement. By 4 months of age, their eyes should be properly aligned and notturned inward or outward.

The symptoms of visual impairment in young children can include:

The following eye diseases and conditions can causeblindness:

Blindness is a potential complication if you have diabetesor have a stroke. Birth defects, eye injuries, and complications from eyesurgery are other common causes of blindness.

The following conditions can impair vision or cause blindnessin infants:

The following categories of people are at risk of blindness:

A thorough eye exam by an optometrist will help to determinethe cause of your blindness or partial loss of vision. Your eye doctor willadminister a series of tests that measure the clarity of your vision, thefunction of your eye muscles, and how your pupils react to light. Theyllexamine the general health of your eyes using a slit lamp, which is a low-powermicroscope paired with a high-intensity light.

A pediatrician will screen your baby for eye problemsshortly after birth. At 6 months of age, you should have an eye doctor orpediatrician check your child again for visual acuity, focus, and eyealignment. The doctor will look at your babys eye structures and see whetherthey can follow a light or colorful object with their eyes.

Your child should be able to pay attention to visual stimuliby 6 to 8 weeks of age. If your child doesnt react to light shining in theireyes or focus on colorful objects by 2 to 3 months of age, have their eyesexamined right away. You should have their eyes examined if you notice crossedeyes or any other symptoms of impaired vision.

In some cases of vision impairment, one or more of thefollowing may help to restore your vision:

If you experience partial blindness that cant be corrected,your doctor will provide guidance on how to function with limited vision. Forexample, you can use a magnifying glass to read, increase the text size on yourcomputer, and use audio clocks and audiobooks.

Complete blindness requires approaching life in a new wayand learning new skills. For example, you may need to learn how to:

You may also need to have handrails installed in yourbathroom.

The long-term outlook for restoring vision and slowingvision loss is better when treatment is preventive and sought immediately.Cataracts can be treated effectively with surgery and dont necessarily resultin blindness. Early diagnosis and treatment are also important in cases ofglaucoma and macular degeneration to help slow down or stop your vision loss.

To detect eye diseases and help prevent vision loss, getregular eye examinations. If youre diagnosed with certain eye conditions, suchas glaucoma, treatment with medication can help prevent blindness.

Have your childs eyes examined at 6 months of age, 3 yearsof age, and every two years between the ages of 6 and 18 years old to helpprevent vision loss. If you notice symptoms of vision loss between routinevisits, make an appointment with their eye doctor immediately.

Written by: Chitra Badii and Marijane LeonardMedically reviewed on: Mar 09, 2016: Mark R. Laflamme, MD

View post:
AARP's Health Tools

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

Blindness (Harvest Book): Jose Saramago, Giovanni Pontiero …

♫ Wednesday, August 22nd, 2018

This is a shattering work by a literary master.The Boston Globe

This is an important book, one that is unafraid to face all of the horrors of the century.The Washington Post

Symphonic . . . [There is] a clear-eyed and compassionate acknowledgment of things as they are, a quality that can only honestly be termed wisdom. We should be grateful when it is handed to us in such generous measure.The New York Times Book Review

Saramago's surreal allegory explores the ability of the human spirit to prevail in even the most absurdly unjust of conditions, yet he reinvents this familiar struggle with the stylistic eccentricity of a master.The New Yorker

Extraordinarily nuanced and evocative . . . This year's most propulsive, and most profound, thriller.The Village Voice

Like Jonathan Swift, Saramago uses airily matter-of-fact detail to frame a bitter parable; unlike Swift he pierces the parable with a dart of steely tenderness . . . out of leisurely prose, the ferocity and tenderness shoot suddenly: arrows set alight. . . . Enchanting, sinuous dialogue.TheLos Angeles Times

Blindness may be as revolutionary in its own way and time as were, say, The Trial and The Plague in theirs. Another masterpiece.Kirkus Reviews (starred review)

Here is the original post:
Blindness (Harvest Book): Jose Saramago, Giovanni Pontiero ...

♫ Posted in Blindness | | Comments Off»

Page 40«..10 20..394041 42..50 60..»

StemCell Therapy

Archive for the ‘Blindness’ Category

Inattentional Blindness in Psychology – Verywell Mind

50 Bible Verses about Blindness

What Is Glaucoma? – American Academy of Ophthalmology

What Is Color Blindness? – American Academy of Ophthalmology

A Definition of Blindness – National Federation of the Blind

Blindness by Ginger Scott

Stem-Cell Treatment for Blindness Moving Through Patient …

What Does the Bible Say About Spiritual Blindness?

National Blindness Professional Certification Board

Blindness – askjan.org

WebAIM: Visual Disabilities – Color-blindness

Colblindor All about Color Blindness

Inattentional blindness – Wikipedia

With river blindness, ‘you never sleep’ – CNN

End Times – Life, Hope & Truth

Messiah’s Message: Repent – Life, Hope & Truth

Color Blindness Tests Colblindor

Blindness – kidshealth.org

AARP’s Health Tools

Blindness (Harvest Book): Jose Saramago, Giovanni Pontiero …

Categories

Archives

Recommended Sites

Recent Posts