header logo image


Page 13«..10..12131415..20..»

Archive for the ‘Neuropathy’ Category

Analysis of COVID-19 Impact: Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market 2020-2024 | Presence of Large Patient Pool to Augment Growth | Technavio – Business Wire

Monday, July 6th, 2020

LONDON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Technavio has been monitoring the neuropathy pain treatment market and it is poised to grow by USD 1,702.89 million during 2020-2024, progressing at a CAGR of almost 5% during the forecast period. The report offers an up-to-date analysis regarding the current market scenario, latest trends and drivers, and the overall market environment.

Although the COVID-19 pandemic continues to transform the growth of various industries, the immediate impact of the outbreak is varied. While a few industries will register a drop in demand, numerous others will continue to remain unscathed and show promising growth opportunities. Technavios in-depth research has all your needs covered as our research reports include all foreseeable market scenarios, including pre- & post-COVID-19 analysis. Download a Free Sample Report

The market is fragmented, and the degree of fragmentation will accelerate during the forecast period. Abbott Laboratories, Assertio Therapeutics Inc., AstraZeneca Plc, Baxter International Inc., Eli Lilly and Co., Endo International Plc, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer Inc., and Sanofi are some of the major market participants. To make the most of the opportunities, market vendors should focus more on the growth prospects in the fast-growing segments, while maintaining their positions in the slow-growing segments.

Buy 1 Technavio report and get the second for 50% off. Buy 2 Technavio reports and get the third for free.

View market snapshot before purchasing

The presence of a large patient pool has been instrumental in driving the growth of the market. However, growing preference for alternatives and high unmet needs in the treatment of neuropathic pain might hamper the market growth.

Technavio's custom research reports offer detailed insights on the impact of COVID-19 at an industry level, a regional level, and subsequent supply chain operations. This customized report will also help clients keep up with new product launches in direct & indirect COVID-19 related markets, upcoming vaccines and pipeline analysis, and significant developments in vendor operations and government regulations.

Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market 2020-2024: Segmentation

Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market is segmented as below:

To learn more about the global trends impacting the future of market research, download a free sample: https://www.technavio.com/talk-to-us?report=IRTNTR43322

Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market 2020-2024: Scope

Technavio presents a detailed picture of the market by the way of study, synthesis, and summation of data from multiple sources. The neuropathy pain treatment market report covers the following areas:

This study identifies the growing focus on the development of drugs for the treatment of diabetic neuropathy pain as one of the prime reasons driving the neuropathy pain treatment market growth during the next few years.

Technavio suggests three forecast scenarios (optimistic, probable, and pessimistic) considering the impact of COVID-19. Technavios in-depth research has direct and indirect COVID-19 impacted market research reports.

Register for a free trial today and gain instant access to 17,000+ market research reports.

Technavio's SUBSCRIPTION platform

Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market 2020-2024: Key Highlights

Table of Contents:

Executive Summary

Market Landscape

Market Sizing

Five Forces Analysis

Market Segmentation by Indication

Market Segmentation by Drug Class

Customer landscape

Geographic Landscape

Vendor Landscape

Vendor Analysis

Appendix

About Us

Technavio is a leading global technology research and advisory company. Their research and analysis focus on emerging market trends and provides actionable insights to help businesses identify market opportunities and develop effective strategies to optimize their market positions. With over 500 specialized analysts, Technavios report library consists of more than 17,000 reports and counting, covering 800 technologies, spanning across 50 countries. Their client base consists of enterprises of all sizes, including more than 100 Fortune 500 companies. This growing client base relies on Technavios comprehensive coverage, extensive research, and actionable market insights to identify opportunities in existing and potential markets and assess their competitive positions within changing market scenarios.

View original post here:
Analysis of COVID-19 Impact: Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market 2020-2024 | Presence of Large Patient Pool to Augment Growth | Technavio - Business Wire

Read More...

New Comprehensive Report on Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market to Witness an Outstanding Growth during 2020 2025 with Top Players Like Pfizer, Depomed,…

Monday, July 6th, 2020

Overview Of Neuropathy Pain Treatment Industry 2020-2025:

This has brought along several changes in This report also covers the impact of COVID-19 on the global market.

The Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market analysis summary by Reports Insights is a thorough study of the current trends leading to this vertical trend in various regions. Research summarizes important details related to market share, market size, applications, statistics and sales. In addition, this study emphasizes thorough competition analysis on market prospects, especially growth strategies that market experts claim.

Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market competition by top manufacturers as follow: , Pfizer, Depomed, Eli Lilly, Endo, Grnenthal Group, Arbor Pharmaceuticals

Get a Sample PDF copy of the report @ https://reportsinsights.com/sample/87455

The global Neuropathy Pain Treatment market has been segmented on the basis of technology, product type, application, distribution channel, end-user, and industry vertical, along with the geography, delivering valuable insights.

The Type Coverage in the Market are: Calcium channel alpha 2-delta ligandsSerotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitorsOthers

Market Segment by Applications, covers:Retail PharmaciesHospitals

Market segment by Regions/Countries, this report coversNorth AmericaEuropeChinaRest of Asia PacificCentral & South AmericaMiddle East & Africa

Major factors covered in the report:

To get this report at a profitable rate.: https://reportsinsights.com/discount/87455

The analysis objectives of the report are:

Access full Report Description, TOC, Table of Figure, Chart, [emailprotected] https://reportsinsights.com/industry-forecast/Neuropathy-Pain-Treatment-Market-87455

About US:

Reports Insights is the leading research industry that offers contextual and data-centric research services to its customers across the globe. The firm assists its clients to strategize business policies and accomplish sustainable growth in their respective market domain. The industry provides consulting services, syndicated research reports, and customized research reports.

Contact US:

:(US) +1-214-272-0234

:(APAC) +91-7972263819

Email:[emailprotected]

Sales:[emailprotected]

More here:
New Comprehensive Report on Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market to Witness an Outstanding Growth during 2020 2025 with Top Players Like Pfizer, Depomed,...

Read More...

Diabetic Neuropathy Drugs Market Growth By Manufacturers, Type And Application, Forecast To 2026 – 3rd Watch News

Monday, July 6th, 2020

New Jersey, United States,- Market Research Intellect sheds light on the market scope, potential, and performance perspective of the Global Diabetic Neuropathy Drugs Market by carrying out an extensive market analysis. Pivotal market aspects like market trends, the shift in customer preferences, fluctuating consumption, cost volatility, the product range available in the market, growth rate, drivers and constraints, financial standing, and challenges existing in the market are comprehensively evaluated to deduce their impact on the growth of the market in the coming years. The report also gives an industry-wide competitive analysis, highlighting the different market segments, individual market share of leading players, and the contemporary market scenario and the most vital elements to study while assessing the global Diabetic Neuropathy Drugs market.

The research study includes the latest updates about the COVID-19 impact on the Diabetic Neuropathy Drugs sector. The outbreak has broadly influenced the global economic landscape. The report contains a complete breakdown of the current situation in the ever-evolving business sector and estimates the aftereffects of the outbreak on the overall economy.

Leading Diabetic Neuropathy Drugs manufacturers/companies operating at both regional and global levels:

To get Incredible Discounts on this Premium Report, Click Here @ https://www.marketresearchintellect.com/ask-for-discount/?rid=175788&utm_source=3WN&utm_medium=888

The Diabetic Neuropathy Drugs market report provides successfully marked contemplated policy changes, favorable circumstances, industry news, developments, and trends. This information can help readers fortify their market position. It packs various parts of information gathered from secondary sources, including press releases, web, magazines, and journals as numbers, tables, pie-charts, and graphs. The information is verified and validated through primary interviews and questionnaires. The data on growth and trends focuses on new technologies, market capacities, raw materials, CAPEX cycle, and the dynamic structure of the Diabetic Neuropathy Drugs market.

This study analyzes the growth of Diabetic Neuropathy Drugs based on the present, past and futuristic data and will render complete information about the Diabetic Neuropathy Drugs industry to the market-leading industry players that will guide the direction of the Diabetic Neuropathy Drugs market through the forecast period. All of these players are analyzed in detail so as to get details concerning their recent announcements and partnerships, product/services, and investment strategies, among others.

Sales Forecast:

The report contains historical revenue and volume that backing information about the market capacity, and it helps to evaluate conjecture numbers for key areas in the Diabetic Neuropathy Drugs market. Additionally, it includes a share of each segment of the Diabetic Neuropathy Drugs market, giving methodical information about types and applications of the market.

Reasons for Buying Diabetic Neuropathy Drugs Market Report

This report gives a forward-looking prospect of various factors driving or restraining market growth.

It renders an in-depth analysis for changing competitive dynamics.

It presents a detailed analysis of changing competition dynamics and puts you ahead of competitors.

It gives a six-year forecast evaluated on the basis of how the market is predicted to grow.

It assists in making informed business decisions by performing a pin-point analysis of market segments and by having complete insights of the Diabetic Neuropathy Drugs market.

This report helps the readers understand key product segments and their future.

Have Any Query? Ask Our Expert @ https://www.marketresearchintellect.com/need-customization/?rid=175788&utm_source=3WN&utm_medium=888

In the end, the Diabetic Neuropathy Drugs market is analyzed for revenue, sales, price, and gross margin. These points are examined for companies, types, applications, and regions.

To summarize, the global Diabetic Neuropathy Drugs market report studies the contemporary market to forecast the growth prospects, challenges, opportunities, risks, threats, and the trends observed in the market that can either propel or curtail the growth rate of the industry. The market factors impacting the global sector also include provincial trade policies, international trade disputes, entry barriers, and other regulatory restrictions.

About Us:

Market Research Intellect provides syndicated and customized research reports to clients from various industries and organizations with the aim of delivering functional expertise. We provide reports for all industries including Energy, Technology, Manufacturing and Construction, Chemicals and Materials, Food and Beverage, and more. These reports deliver an in-depth study of the market with industry analysis, the market value for regions and countries, and trends that are pertinent to the industry.

Contact Us:

Mr. Steven Fernandes

Market Research Intellect

New Jersey ( USA )

Tel: +1-650-781-4080

Our Trending Reports

Sales Tax Software Market Size, Growth Analysis, Opportunities, Business Outlook and Forecast to 2026

Sensors Market Size, Growth Analysis, Opportunities, Business Outlook and Forecast to 2026

U.S. Pest Control Market Size, Growth Analysis, Opportunities, Business Outlook and Forecast to 2026

Battery Monitoring System Market Size, Growth Analysis, Opportunities, Business Outlook and Forecast to 2026

Returnable Packaging Market Size, Growth Analysis, Opportunities, Business Outlook and Forecast to 2026

Read the original post:
Diabetic Neuropathy Drugs Market Growth By Manufacturers, Type And Application, Forecast To 2026 - 3rd Watch News

Read More...

Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment Market 2026 Expected to reach Highest CAGR including major key players Achelios Therapeutics Inc,…

Monday, July 6th, 2020

Due to the pandemic, we have included a special section on the Impact of COVID 19 on the Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy TreatmentMarket which would mention How the Covid-19 is Affecting the Industry, Market Trends and Potential Opportunities in the COVID-19 Landscape, Key Regions and Proposal for Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment Market Players to battle Covid-19 Impact.

Theglobal Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment market has been remarkable momentum in the recent years. The Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy TreatmentMarket report is one of the most comprehensive and important data about business strategies, qualitative and quantitative analysis of Global Market. It offers detailed research and analysis of key aspects of the Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment market. The market analysts authoring this report have provided in-depth information on leading growth drivers, restraints, challenges, trends, and opportunities to offer a complete analysis of the Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment market.

Top Leading players covered in the Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment market report: Achelios Therapeutics Inc, Advinus Therapeutics Ltd, Apollo Endosurgery Inc, Aptinyx Inc, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp, Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd, Celgene Corp, DermaXon LLC, Eisai, Immune Pharmaceuticals Inc, INSYS Therapeutics Inc, Kineta Inc, KPI Therapeutics Inc, Krenitsky Pharmaceuticals Inc, MAKScientific LLC, Metys Pharmaceuticals AG, Midatech Pharma US Inc, Mundipharma International Ltd, Nemus Bioscience Inc, Neurocentrx Pharma Ltd, Panacea Pharmaceuticals Inc, PeriphaGen Inc, PharmatrophiX Inc, PledPharma AB, Sova Pharmaceuticals Inc, Virobay Inc, WEX Pharmaceuticals Inc and More

Get PDF Sample Report With Impact of COVID-19 on Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment [emailprotected] https://www.marketinforeports.com/Market-Reports/Request-Sample/98997

The Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment market report specifically highlights the market share, regional outlook, company profiles, product portfolio, a record of the recent developments, strategic analysis, Achelios Therapeutics Inc, Advinus Therapeutics Ltd, Apollo Endosurgery Inc, Aptinyx Inc, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp, Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd, Celgene Corp, DermaXon LLC, Eisai, Immune Pharmaceuticals Inc, INSYS Therapeutics Inc, Kineta Inc, KPI Therapeutics Inc, Krenitsky Pharmaceuticals Inc, MAKScientific LLC, Metys Pharmaceuticals AG, Midatech Pharma US Inc, Mundipharma International Ltd, Nemus Bioscience Inc, Neurocentrx Pharma Ltd, Panacea Pharmaceuticals Inc, PeriphaGen Inc, PharmatrophiX Inc, PledPharma AB, Sova Pharmaceuticals Inc, Virobay Inc, WEX Pharmaceuticals Inc in the market, sales, distribution chain, manufacturing, production, new market entrants as well as existing market players, advertising, brand value, popular products, demand and supply, and other important factors related to the market to help the new entrants understand the market scenario better. the global Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment market will showcase a steady CAGR in the forecast year 2020 to 2026.

On the basis of product, this report displays the production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into:APX-3330BR-297CannabidiolDimiracetamOthersOn the basis on the end users/applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share and growth rate of Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment for each application, including:ClinicHospitalOthers

Our Complimentary Sample Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment market Report Accommodate a Brief Introduction of the research report, TOC, List of Tables and Figures, Competitive Landscape and Geographic Segmentation, Innovation and Future Developments Based on Research Methodology.

Inquire and Get Up to 30% DiscountBy Clicking Here!https://www.marketinforeports.com/Market-Reports/Request_discount/98997

Regions Covered in the Global Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment Market: The Middle East and Africa (GCC Countries and Egypt) North America (the United States, Mexico, and Canada) South America (Brazil etc.) Europe (Turkey, Germany, Russia UK, Italy, France, etc.) Asia-Pacific (Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Japan, Philippines, Korea, Thailand, India, Indonesia, and Australia)

Years Considered to Estimate the Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment Market Size:History Year: 2015-2019Base Year: 2019Estimated Year: 2020Forecast Year: 2020-2026

Highlights of the Report: Accurate market size and CAGR forecasts for the period 2019-2026 Identification and in-depth assessment of growth opportunities in key segments and regions Detailed company profiling of top players of the global Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment market Exhaustive research on innovation and other trends of the global Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment market Reliable industry value chain and supply chain analysis Comprehensive analysis of important growth drivers, restraints, challenges, and growth prospects

For More Information:https://www.marketinforeports.com/Market-Reports/98997/Chemotherapy-Induced-Peripheral-Neuropathy-Treatment-market

Customization of the Report:Market Info Reports provides customization of reports as per your need. This report can be personalized to meet your requirements. Get in touch with our sales team, who will guarantee you to get a report that suits your necessities.

Get Customization of the [emailprotected]:https://www.marketinforeports.com/Market-Reports/Request-Customization/98997/Chemotherapy-Induced-Peripheral-Neuropathy-Treatment-market

Contact Us:Mr. Marcus KelCall: +1 415 658 9988 (International)+91 84 839 65921 (IND)Email: [emailprotected]Website: http://www.marketinforeports.com

Read more from the original source:
Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment Market 2026 Expected to reach Highest CAGR including major key players Achelios Therapeutics Inc,...

Read More...

Calpain-2 as a therapeutic target in repeated concussioninduced neuropathy and behavioral impairment – Science Advances

Monday, July 6th, 2020

Abstract

Repeated concussion represents a serious health problem as it can result in various brain pathologies, ranging from minor focal tissue injury to severe chronic traumatic encephalopathy. The calcium-dependent protease, calpain, participates in the development of neurodegeneration following concussion, but there is no information regarding the relative contribution of calpain-1 and calpain-2, the major calpain isoforms in the brain. We used a mouse model of repeated concussions, which reproduces most of the behavioral and neuropathological features of the human condition, to address this issue. Deletion of calpain-2 or treatment with a selective calpain-2 inhibitor for 2 weeks prevented most of these neuropathological features. Changes in TAR DNA binding protein 43 (TDP-43) subcellular localization similar to those found in human amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia were also prevented by deletion of calpain-2 or treatment with calpain-2 inhibitor. Our results indicate that a selective calpain-2 inhibitor represents a therapeutic approach for concussion.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious public health problem in the United States. In 2013 alone, an estimated 2.8 million TBI cases presented for treatment, and it is likely that many more cases were never reported (www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/get_the_facts.html). The cause of injury varies greatly and includes motor vehicle accidents, falls, sport injuries, and gunshot wounds, to name a few. The severity of TBI is generally classified as mild (1), also called concussion, moderate, and severe, which is often associated with a prolonged period of unconsciousness after the injury. TBI induces immediate and prolonged neuropathological consequences, including axonal damage (2) and neuronal death (3). In recent years, repeated mild TBI (rmTBI) has received a lot of attention after it was found that many athletes subjected to repeated concussions exhibit a chronic degenerative disease referred to as chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) (4). CTE is characterized by massive accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau, gliosis, and neurodegeneration (5).

Numerous reviews have discussed the role of calpain in neurodegeneration (6, 7) in general and more specifically, in stroke (8, 9) and TBI (10, 11). Consequently, numerous studies have evaluated the use of calpain inhibitors to reduce neurodegeneration in both stroke and TBI (12, 13, 14). While some studies have reported some positive effects of calpain inhibitors in TBI (15), other studies have not confirmed these results. In particular, overexpression of the endogenous calpain inhibitor, calpastatin, was reported to reduce the formation of spectrin breakdown product (SBDP) (9), resulting from calpain-mediated truncation of spectrin, a widely used biomarker of calpain activation and potentially of neurodegeneration (16), but had no effect on neurodegeneration (17). Recent studies concluded that two calpain inhibitors, SNJ-1945 and MDL-28170, which are blood-brain barrier and cell permeable, did not have sufficient efficacy or a practical therapeutic window in a widely used TBI model, referred to as the controlled cortical impact (CCI) model (15, 18). While those nonisoform-selective calpain inhibitors were shown to inhibit overall calpain activation (without distinguishing which calpain isoform was targeted) following TBI, they failed to provide neuroprotection.

Diffuse axonal degeneration has been shown to be responsible for many of the long-term functional consequences of mTBI (1, 19). Calpain activation has been repeatedly shown to be involved in diffuse axonal injury, as calpain-mediated proteolysis of spectrin has been observed 1 to 2 hours after injury. Blood levels of the calpain-mediated N-terminal fragment of spectrin were found to be elevated shortly after injury and predicted the long-term consequences of the injury in patients with mTBI, including professional hockey players experiencing concussions (20, 21). While all the evidence strongly supports a role for calpain in mTBI, there is little information regarding which of the calpain isoforms is responsible for producing the neuropathological consequences of mTBI or rmTBI. We previously proposed that calpain-1 activation was neuroprotective, while calpain-2 activation was neurodegenerative and provided evidence for such opposite functions of these two calpain isoforms in the CCI mouse model of TBI (22). Here, we report that calpain-2 conditional knockout (C2CKO) mice are remarkably protected against the pathological consequences of rmTBI. Moreover, semichronic treatment of wild-type (WT) mice with a selective calpain-2 inhibitor results in a similar level of protection in the rmTBI mouse model. In this model, the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) marker, TDP-43, exhibits changes in subcellular localization similar to those found in these patients, and these changes are also prevented by either genetic deletion or pharmaceutical inhibition of calpain-2. These results strongly suggest that a selective calpain-2 inhibitor could be a useful therapeutic treatment to prevent the long-term consequences of repeated concussions.

We generated C2CKO mice by crossing loxPcalpain-2 mice (obtained from the Riken Institute, Japan) with CamKII-Cre mice (the Jackson laboratory) to produce mice with selective calpain-2 deletion in excitatory neurons from the forebrain. These mice exhibit widespread deletion of calpain-2 in the majority of neurons in the cortex and almost complete elimination of calpain-2 in hippocampus (Fig. 1A and fig. S1A). We previously reported that N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)mediated neurotoxicity in acute hippocampal slices prepared from juvenile mice was exacerbated in calpain-1 KO mice but reduced in the presence of a calpain-2 inhibitor (23). To further corroborate the role of calpain-2 in NMDA-mediated neurotoxicity, we tested the effects of NMDA treatment of hippocampal slices from 2-week-old WT or from C2CKO mice on neuronal injury. As previously reported, NMDA treatment resulted in a significant increase in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release in the incubation medium, a well-recognized marker of neurotoxicity (Fig. 1B). The effect was significantly reduced in the slices from C2CKO mice, thereby confirming the role of calpain-2 activation in NMDA-mediated neurotoxicity. NMDA receptormediated neurotoxicity has been extensively studied in TBI models (24). We compared the extent of brain lesion in WT and C2CKO mice in the CCI model of TBI. Lesion volume was significantly reduced in the brain of C2CKO mice as compared to WT mice (fig. S1, B and C). These results further support the role of calpain-2 activation in NMDA receptormediated neurotoxicity in vivo.

(A) Calpain-2 deletion in cortex and hippocampus in C2CKO mice. loxP-Calpain-2 mice were crossed with CamKII-Cre mice to generate mice with calpain-2 deletion in excitatory neurons of the forebrain. Note the very large decrease in calpain-2 immunoreactivity in cortex and field CA1 of hippocampus and the absence of changes in calpain-1 staining. Scale bar, 50 m. (B) Reduced NMDA-mediated toxicity in acute hippocampal slices from C2CKO mice. Hippocampal slices were prepared from 3-week-old WT or C2CKO mice. They were incubated with NMDA (100 M) for 2.5 hours, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release in the medium was assayed. Results represent means SEM of four experiments. **P < 0.01. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferronis test. (C and F) Changes in spectrin and TDP-43 in ipsilateral cortex (C) and hippocampus (F) at various times after the last concussion in WT and C2CKO mice. WT and C2CKO mice were subjected to 10 days of repeated concussions. They were sacrificed 1, 3, and 7 days after the last day of treatment, and levels of the SBDP generated by calpain activation and full-length TDP-43 were determined by Western blot analysis. (D, E, and G) Quantification of the Western blot data for ipsilateral cortex [(D) and (E)] and ipsilateral hippocampus (G). Results represent means SEM of four experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared to WT basal. Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferronis test. Ctl, control.

We previously reported that calpain-2 played a significant role in the CCI model of TBI in mice (22). To analyze the potential role of calpain-2 in rmTBI, we used the repetitive concussion model developed by Petraglia and colleagues (25, 26). In this model, awake mice are subjected to four daily hits on the head for 10 consecutive days (see Materials and Methods). We first determined the time course of calpain activation in the brain in this model. Animals were sacrificed at various times after the last impact, and levels of the SBDP generated by calpain activation in cortex and hippocampus were determined (Fig. 1, C to F). In WT mice, SBDP levels in the cortex ipsilateral from the impact were elevated 24 hours and 3 days after the last impact. They were still slightly elevated 7 days after the last impact. Similar results were found in ipsilateral hippocampus. In contrast, there was no increase in SBDP levels at any time in cortex or hippocampus from C2CKO mice. We also analyzed the time course of the exposure of the phosphatase-activated domain (PAD) of tau, which appears early in tauopathy (fig. S1, D to G) (27, 28). In control animals, the changes in PAD-tau were quite similar to those found in SBDP in both cortex and hippocampus, with small variation in statistical significance. In contrast, there were no changes in phosphoPAD-tau in cortex and hippocampus from C2CKO mice after rmTBI.

Previous studies using the same model of repeated concussions have shown that mice exhibited a number of behavioral impairments, including cognitive impairment, as well as many pathological changes, such as activation of astrocytes and microglia in various brain regions and axonal degeneration mostly localized to the corpus callosum and the optic tract (24). At 1 and 3 months after the last concussion, WT mice exhibited depressed behavior after the last concussion, as evidenced in the tail suspension test in which mice subjected to repeated concussions became immobile much faster than the sham mice (Fig. 2, A and B); in contrast, C2CKO mice did not exhibit any of these behavioral alterations. We also tested the loxP-calpain-2 mice (control for C2CKO) and found that they behave very similarly to the WT mice. At 1 and 3 months after repeated concussions, WT mice exhibited increased risk-taking behavior in the elevated plus maze, as evidenced by increased time spent in the open arms and increased number of entries in open arms (Fig. 2, C to F). This behavioral alteration was completely absent in C2CKO mice. Again, control mice behave similarly to WT mice. Last, we tested mice for cognitive impairment at 1 and 3 months after repeated concussions, using hippocampus-dependent fear conditioning. While WT and control mice exhibited significant impairment in learning and memory, C2CKO mice did not exhibit any significant deficits (Fig. 2, G and H). We also analyzed changes in motor function immediately and for 2 weeks after the last concussion using the beam-walking test, which has previously been used to detect the effects of concussion on speed and balance. Repeated concussions produced a relatively mild impairment, as evidenced by increase in both the time to cross the beam and the number of foot slips at 1 hour, 1 day, and 4 days after the last concussion. WT mice recovered 7 days later (fig. S2, A and B). While C2CKO mice performed a little better than WT, the differences were not statistically significant.

(A and B) Changes in tail suspension task at 1 (A) and 3 (B) months after repeated concussions. Groups of sham and rmTBI WT, C2CKO, and control mice were suspended by the tail for 5 min. The time during which the animals remained immobile was recorded. n = 9 for WT and C2CKO groups, and n = 8 for control groups. Results are means SEM. *P < 0.05. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferronis test. (C to F) Changes in plus-elevated maze at 1 [(C) and (D)] and 3 [(E) and (F)] months after repeated concussions. Groups of sham and rmTBI WT, C2CKO, and control mice were placed in an elevated plus maze, and the time spent in open arms [(C) and (E)] and number of entries in open arms [(D) and (F)] were recorded. n = 9 for WT and C2CKO groups, and n = 8 for control groups. Results are means SEM. *P < 0.05. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferronis test. (G and H) Performance in fear conditioning test at 1 (G) and 3 (H) months after repeated concussions. Groups of sham and rmTBI WT, C2CKO, and control mice were trained in the context test of the fear conditioning task. They were tested the following day, and the percent freezing time over 5-min test was recorded. n = 8 for WT and C2CKO groups, and n = 7 for control groups. Results are means SEM. *P < 0.05. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferronis test.

A major pathological hallmark of repeated concussions is brain inflammation reflected by activation of both astrocytes and microglia (1). We analyzed astrocyte and microglia activation in the brain at 3 months following repeated concussions. We used immunohistochemistry (IHC) to label glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)positive astrocytes (Fig. 3A and fig. S3) and Iba-1positive microglia (Fig. 3C and fig. S4) and quantitatively determined the numbers of reactive astrocytes and activated microglia, as described in Materials and Methods. The numbers of reactive astrocytes and activated microglia were significantly increased in hippocampus and cortex of WT and control mice (Fig. 3, B and D, and figs. S3 and S4). In contrast, C2CKO mice did not exhibit any significant increase in number of reactive astrocytes or activated microglia.

Groups of sham and rmTBI WT, C2CKO, and control mice were sacrificed 3 months after repeated concussions. (A) Changes in astrocyte activation in field CA1 of hippocampus. Brains were fixed and processed for IHC with GFAP antibodies. Scale bar, 100 m. (B) Quantification was performed, as described in Materials and Methods. n = 8 for WT and C2CKO groups, and n = 7 for control groups. ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferronis test. Data represent means SEM. (C) Changes in microglia activation in field CA1 of hippocampus. Brains were fixed and processed for IHC with iba-1 antibodies. Scale bar, 100 m. (D) Quantification was performed, as described in Materials and Methods. n = 8 for WT and C2CKO groups, and n = 7 for control groups. *P < 0.05 and ****P < 0.0001. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferronis test. Data represent means SEM. (E) Changes in axonal degeneration in the optic tract. Brains were fixed and processed for Gallyas staining. Scale bar, 100 m. (F) Quantification was performed, as described in Materials and Methods. n = 6. **P < 0.01. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test. Data represent means SEM.

Another hallmark of repeated concussions is axonal degeneration in various neuronal tracts (1). We used Gallyas staining to visualize axonal degeneration 3 months after repeated concussions (Fig. 3, E and F). Axonal degeneration was prominent in the optic tract in WT and control mice subjected to repeated concussions. No significant axonal degeneration was observed in C2CKO mice after repeated concussions. Image analysis was used to quantify the results and confirmed the significant axonal degeneration following repeated concussions in WT and control mice and its absence in C2CKO mice. Neuronal loss has also been observed in some models of repeated concussions (29). We therefore determined the number of neurons in various brain structures following repeated concussions in WT mice. Under our experimental conditions, we did not detect a significant decrease in the number of NeuN-positive cells in various brain regions 3 months following repeated concussions in WT mice (fig. S5, A to C).

As mentioned above, one of the hallmarks of CTE is a massive increase in tau hyperphosphorylation at various residues in various brain regions. We had previously observed tau hyperphosphorylation in the CCI mouse model of TBI and proposed the hypothesis that this effect was triggered at least, in part, by calpain-2mediated cleavage of the tyrosine phosphatase, PTPN13, and the resulting activation of c-Abl (22). In the present study, massive increase in tau phosphorylation at threonine 231 was present in cortex, corpus callosum, and optic tract 3 months after rmTBI in WT and control mice (Fig. 4, A to F). On the other hand, no significant changes in tau phosphorylation were detected in C2CKO mice. TDP-43 is an RNA/DNA binding protein, which accumulates in neurons in ALS and FTLD (30). One of the hypotheses for its accumulation in these diseases is that TDP-43 is partially cleaved by calpain, preventing its nuclear transport and inducing its cytosol accumulation and aggregation (31). We therefore determined changes in cortical levels of TDP-43 following rmTBI in WT and C2CKO mice at 1, 3, and 7 days after repeated concussions (Fig. 1, C and E). TDP-43 levels were significantly decreased at these three time points in WT mice but were unchanged in C2CKO mice. In cortex, phosphoTDP-43 (p-TDP-43), the pathological form of TDP-43, exhibited changes in subcellular localization, with accumulation in the cytoplasm and decreased expression in the nucleus, where it is found under control conditions (Fig. 4, G and H), which were very similar to what has been reported in human patients with ALS or FTLD (30). These changes in p-TDP-43 localization were completely absent in C2CKO mice (Fig. 4, G and H).

Groups of sham and rmTBI WT, C2CKO, and control mice were sacrificed 3 months after repeated concussions. (A, C, and E) Changes in tau phosphorylation in cortex, corpus callosum, and optic tract. Brains were fixed and processed for IHC with phospho-tau (p-tau) Thr231 antibodies. Scale bars, 20 m. (B, D, and F) Quantification of images similar to those shown. n = 6 for WT sham; n = 7 for C2CKO sham, control sham, and control rmTBI; n = 8 for WT rmTBI and C2CKO rmTBI. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferronis test. Data represent means SEM. (G) Changes in phosphoTDP-43 (p-TDP-43) subcellular localization in cortex. Brains were fixed and processed for IHC with a p-TDP-43 Ser409/Ser410 antibody. Scale bar, 20 m. (H) Quantification of the p-TDP-43 intensity ratio of nuclei to cytoplasm. n = 4. ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferronis test. Data represent means SEM.

We previously identified a relatively selective calpain-2 inhibitor, C2I (32), which provides a significant degree of protection against pathological changes in the CCI mouse model of TBI, when injected intraperitoneally after TBI (22). For the present study, in which repeated concussions were administered over a period of 10 days, we selected to deliver C2I through subcutaneously implanted Alzet minipumps. We first verified that this mode of delivery was effective to inhibit calpain-2mediated neurodegeneration in cortex in the CCI model (fig. S5, D and E). The pumps were then implanted the day before the start of the concussions and were withdrawn after 2 weeks. Animals were tested for motor impairment immediately at the end of the repeated concussions and for cognitive impairment 1 month later. They were then sacrificed, and the same pathological markers used previously were analyzed. Animals treated with C2I were significantly protected against the depression symptom (fig. S6A), the risk-taking behavior (fig. S6, B and C), and cognitive impairment, assessed with novel object location (fig. S6D) and hippocampus-dependent fear conditioning (fig. S6E). These results were quite similar to those observed in the C2CKO mice, although the animals were tested 1 month after the last concussion. We also analyzed changes in motor function immediately and for 2 weeks following the last concussion using the beam-walking test (fig. S2, C and D). The results in animals treated with C2I were very similar to those we observed in C2CKO mice; and although C2I-treated animals performed slightly better than vehicle-treated animals, the differences were not statistically significant. Astrogliosis, microglial activation, and axonal degeneration were analyzed 1 month after the last concussion (Fig. 5). Animals treated with C2I did not exhibit significant astroglial (Fig. 5, A and B) and microglial (Fig. 5, C and D) activation in field CA1; they also did not show astroglial or microglial activation in CA3, dentate gyrus, or cortex (figs. S7 and S8). Axonal degeneration 1 month after concussion was observed in the optic tract (Fig. 5, E and F) in vehicle-treated animals but was not significantly changed in animals treated with C2I. We also observed axonal degeneration in cortex and in corpus callosum 1 month after the last concussion in vehicle-treated animals, and this effect was much reduced by C2I treatment (fig. S9). One month after the last concussion increased tau phosphorylation was observed in various brain regions in vehicle-treated animals, including cortex (Fig. 6, A and B), corpus callosum (Fig. 6, C and D), and optic tract (Fig. 6, E and F). These changes in tau phosphorylation were absent in animals treated with C2I. Changes in p-TDP-43 subcellular localization were also observed 1 month after the last concussion in cortex, with p-TDP-43 being almost exclusively translocated from the nucleus to the cytoplasm (fig. S10, A and B). TDP-43 subcellular localization was not significantly altered in C2I-treated mice. Last, levels of p-TDP-43 were significantly increased after rmTBI in the optic tract (fig. S10, C and D), suggesting abnormal processing of p-TDP-43 in the axons of retinal ganglion cells. Levels of p-TDP-43 in the optic tract were not significantly increased after rmTBI in C2I-treated mice.

WT mice were implanted with Alzet minipumps delivering vehicle [veh; 400 mg/ml; (2-hydroxypropyl)--cyclodextrin] or C2I (0.3 mg kg1 day1) 1 day before 10 days of repeated concussions. Pumps were withdrawn 4 days after the last day of concussion, and the animals were sacrificed 4 weeks later. (A) Changes in astrocyte activation in field CA1 of hippocampus. Brains were fixed and processed for IHC with GFAP antibodies. Scale bar, 100 m. (B) Quantification of images similar to those shown. n = 8 for veh sham and veh rmTBI, n = 7 for C2I sham, n = 9 for C2I rmTBI. **P < 0.01. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferronis test. Data represent means SEM. (C) Changes in microglia activation in field CA1 of hippocampus. Brains were fixed and processed for IHC with iba-1 antibodies. Scale bar, 100 m. (D) Quantification of images similar to those shown. n = 8 for veh sham and veh rmTBI; n = 7 for C2I sham; and n = 9 for C2I rmTBI. *P < 0.05. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferronis test. Data represent means SEM. (E) Changes in axonal degeneration in the optic tract. Brains were fixed and processed for Gallyas staining. Scale bar, 100 m. (F) Quantification of images similar to those shown. n = 6. **P < 0.01. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferronis test. Data represent means SEM.

WT mice were implanted with Alzet minipumps delivering vehicle [400 mg/ml; (2-hydroxypropyl)--cyclodextrin] or C2I (0.3 mg kg1 day1) 1 day before 10 days of repeated concussions. Pumps were withdrawn 4 days after the last day of concussion, and the animals were sacrificed 4 weeks later. (A, C, and E) Changes in tau phosphorylation in cortex, corpus callosum, and optic tract. Brains were fixed and processed for IHC with p-tau Thr231 antibodies. Scale bars, 20 m. (B, D, and F) Quantification of images similar to those shown. n = 8 for veh sham and veh rmTBI; n = 7 for C2I sham; and n = 9 for C2I rmTBI. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferronis test. Data represent means SEM.

Our results demonstrate that calpain-2 activation plays a critical role in the development of neuropathology following repeated concussions. Thus, both the functional impairment and the pathological manifestations of brain damage, including inflammation, axonal degeneration, and tau and TDP-43 abnormalities, were absent in mice with genetic calpain-2 deletion or treatment with a relatively selective calpain-2 inhibitor. One of the difficulties to identify novel therapeutic treatments for neurological diseases has been the lack of reproducibility in the animal models used in various laboratories. It is therefore reassuring that our results in the mouse model of repeated mild concussions are in excellent agreement with the findings reported by Petraglia et al. (25, 26) and others (1). Thus, we observed early impairment in motor function, which rapidly recovered, and changes in depression symptoms and risk-taking behavior similar to those previously reported. While previous studies have used the Morris water maze to analyze changes in cognitive behavior, we used fear conditioning as an index of cognition and also observed changes in performance in this paradigm, confirming that rmTBI results in impaired cognition. We observed widespread astroglia and microglia activation at 1 and 3 months after the last concussion. We identified reactive astrocytes on the basis of their larger size and number of processes (33) and quantified their numbers in various brain regions. Our results demonstrated increased numbers of reactive astrocytes at 1 and 3 months after repeated concussions. In contrast, there was no increase in the numbers of reactive astrocytes in C2CKO mice or after treatment with the selective calpain-2 inhibitor. Similarly, we identified reactive microglia on the basis of larger and irregular soma (34) and quantified their numbers in various brain regions after repeated concussions. Our results indicated that there was a significant increase in the numbers of reactive microglia after repeated concussions in WT and control mice but no increase following down-regulation of calpain-2 or pharmacological inhibition. Increased tau phosphorylation was present in various brain regions, as previously reported in various models of mTBI (35). Axonal degeneration was present in corpus callosum and optic tract, in good agreement with previous reports (26). While some neuronal degeneration has been reported in some model of repeated concussions (29), we did not observe any significant neuronal loss 3 months after repeated concussions in WT mice. It is conceivable that Wallerian degeneration could take place and that neuronal loss could develop more slowly in the model we used. We also confirmed that, in this model, alterations in TDP-43, which had been previously reported in ALS and frontotemporal dementia (30), were also present in cortex. Thus, TDP-43 levels in cortex were decreased up to 7 days after repeated concussions in WT but not in C2CKO. In addition, TDP-43 exhibited changes in subcellular localization from the nucleus in control animals to the cytoplasm 3 months after repeated concussions. This change in subcellular localization has been previously discussed in relationship to calpain-mediated cleavage, leading to aggregation in the cytoplasm and contributing to the neurodegeneration observed in these disorders (35). Our findings strongly suggest that following rmTBI, TDP-43 could also be cleaved by calpain-2 and localized to the cytoplasm where aggregated TDP-43 could contribute to neurodegenerative changes. Several studies have shown that TBI can lead to CTE and ALS (3), although the potential mechanisms underlying the development of either CTE or ALS following TBI or repeated concussions are not well understood (36).

Although calpain has been repeatedly proposed to play a significant role in TBI (10, 11), there are only few data regarding the respective roles of calpain-1 and calpain-2, two of the major calpain isoforms, in TBI or concussion. We previously reported that, while calpain-1 was rapidly and transiently activated in a mouse model of TBI, calpain-2 activation was delayed and prolonged (22). Comparing the changes in SBDP in cortex and hippocampus between WT and C2CKO mice, our results indicate that in the rmTBI model, calpain-2 is activated 24 hours after the last concussion and remains activated for up to 1 week in both cortex and hippocampus. This time course of calpain-2 activation is quite similar to what we observed in the more severe TBI model we previously used. In the TBI model, we also observed that levels of calpain-2 activation were closely related to the extent of degenerating cells. In the less severe model of repeated concussions, there was no clear evidence of degenerating cells, as previously reported, suggesting that the extent of calpain-2 activation might not be sufficient to trigger cell death.

While the extent of calpain-2 activation might not have been sufficient to trigger significant cell death, it was sufficient to trigger a whole host of neurodegenerative events, including activation of astrocytes and microglia and axonal degeneration in several tracts, such as in the corpus callosum and the optic tract, since all these events were lacking in calpain-2 KO mice. These results are somewhat different from what we observed in the TBI model. In this model, we did observe massive astroglial activation 7 days after TBI in the cortex surrounding the lesion, and this was not blocked by a daily injection with a selective calpain-2 inhibitor (22). In the present study, continuous administration of the same calpain-2 inhibitor prevented glial reaction and axonal degeneration observed at 1 month after the last concussion. Reasons for this difference are currently not clear. It could be that genetic calpain-2 deletion or continuous administration of the calpain-2 inhibitor provides better calpain-2 inhibition than the daily intraperitoneal injections. It could also be related to the differences in time points selected in the two studies, since we analyzed glial activation at 1 month after concussion and not 1 week. In any event, glial activation is generally considered to have a dual effect in neurodegeneration, depending on the types of glial cells activated (37). In our studies, we did not attempt to distinguish between different subtypes of astrocytes or microglia, but it is quite remarkable that calpain-2 deletion completely eliminated both astrocyte and microglia activation. As previously mentioned, TBI and rmTBI have been shown to be associated with increased tau phosphorylation at various sites. We previously reported an increased tau phosphorylation at residue Tyr245 in the CCI model of TBI, and this effect was significantly reduced following treatment with C2I (38). In the present study, we also found that calpain-2 deletion in excitatory neurons from the forebrain completely prevented rmTBI-induced increased in tau phosphorylation. We previously proposed that calpain-2mediated truncation of the tyrosine phosphatase, PTPN13, represents a link between calpain-2 and tau phosphorylation, as one of the targets of PTPN13 is c-Abl, which can phosphorylate tau at Tyr245. However, there are other pathways that could be regulated by calpain, including glycogen synthase kinase (39), which can also result in tau phosphorylation at various residues.

We used a relatively selective calpain-2 inhibitor, Z-Leu-Abu-CONH-CH2-C6H3 (C2I), to further confirm the role of calpain-2 in rmTBI-mediated behavioral impairments and neuropathology. Because of the duration of the repeated concussions and the prolonged activation of calpain-2 in this model, we selected to continuously deliver C2I through subcutaneously implanted minipumps, which significantly prevented calpain-2 activation in the brain following trauma. Treatment of WT mice with C2I reproduced all the beneficial effects of calpain-2 deletion at the behavioral and neuropathological levels. Thus, C2I-treated mice did not exhibit the depression symptom or the risk-taking behavior of the vehicle-treated mice. They also did not exhibit the cognitive impairment in the fear conditioning task. Activation of astrocytes and microglia was also almost completely prevented in the different brain regions tested. Likewise, increased tau phosphorylation and changes in subcellular localization of TDP-43 were almost completely blocked by C2I treatment.

Our results establish that calpain-2 activation is a critical step, leading to a wide range of neuropathological changes and behavioral alterations following repeated concussions. They also demonstrate that treatment with a selective calpain-2 inhibitor represents a novel potential therapeutic approach to prevent brain damage and behavioral modifications following repeated concussions. In the present experiments, we started treatment with the selective calpain-2 inhibitor the day before the first concussion episode, and our results suggest the possibility of using a similar approach for individuals at risk for CTE, such as athletes in sport contact and military personnel. Future experiments will be directed at determining the effects of posttreatment with the inhibitor to further establish the possibility of using this treatment in human participants exposed to concussion. Considering that a blood biomarker based on calpain activation has been proposed to be a predictive diagnostic tool for human concussion, and that tau PET has recently been shown to be a useful tool to investigate neurodegeneration after TBI in human participants (40), our results further warrant pursuing the development of a selective calpain-2 inhibitor for the treatment of concussions.

The objective of this study is to examine the role of calpain-2 in the pathology of repetitive mTBI. For this, we performed rmTBI or sham procedure on three groups of mice. The first group consisted of 16 WT mice and 16 C2CKO mice. Mice were euthanized at 1, 3, and 7 days after rmTBI (four mice for each time point) or 1 day after sham procedure. Brain tissue was collected to analyze markers for calpain activation, SBDP, and for early pathological tau, PAD-tau. The second group of mice consisted of WT mice, C2CKO mice, and calpain-2 loxP mice (control for calpain-2 CKO). There were ~18 mice for each genotype (half for rmTBI and half for sham). Beam-walking tests were performed from 0 to 14 days after rmTBI. Elevated plus maze, tail suspension, and fear conditioning tests were performed at 1 and 3 months after rmTBI. The third group of mice consisted of WT mice treated with C2I or vehicle. There were ~18 mice for C2I and ~18 mice for vehicle. Beam-walking tests were performed from 0 to 14 days after rmTBI. Elevated plus maze, tail suspension, novel object, and fear conditioning tests were sequentially performed at 1 month after rmTBI. For the second and third group, mice were euthanized after behavioral tests and IHC was performed on brain sections to examine several pathological markers such as GFAP, iba-1, phospho-tau (p-tau), and p-TDP-43. Silver staining was also performed to examine neurodegeneration. In rare cases, mice showing abnormalities such as signs of pain, motor impairment, and seizures during rmTBI procedure were immediately removed from the study. Specifically, one mouse was removed from the WT rmTBI group, two mice were removed from the control rmTBI group, one mouse was removed from the vehicle rmTBI group, while no mouse was removed from the C2CKO rmTBI or C2I rmTBI group. For all behavioral and IHC studies, experiments and data analysis were done by two persons in a blind fashion.

Animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the principles and procedures of the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All protocols were approved by the local Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

We used C57Bl/6 (WT), CamKII-Cre+/ CAPN2loxP/loxP (calpain-2 CKO), and CAPN2loxP/loxP (loxPcalpain-2) mice, referred to as control. All mice are on a C57Bl/6 background.

Primary antibodies for Western blot: SBDP (1:20; MAB1622, EMD Millipore) and PAD-tau (1:20; MABN417, EMD Millipore). Primary antibodies for IHC: calpain-1 (1:200; LS-B4768, LSBio), calpain-2 (1:300; LS-C337641, LSBio), GFAP (1:1000; AB5804, Abcam), iba-1 (1:400; AB5076, Abcam), p-tau Thr231 (1:200; MN1040, Thermo Fisher Scientific), p-TDP-43 409/410 (1:400; 22309-1-AP, Proteintech), and NeuN (1:200; ab104224, Abcam). Secondary antibodies for IHC: Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) (1:400; A11037, Thermo Fisher Scientific), Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-mouse IgG (1:400; A11005, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and Alexa Fluor 594 donkey anti-goat IgG (1:400; A11058, Thermo Fisher Scientific).

NMDA toxicity in acute hippocampal slices from postnatal days 14 to 16 WT or C2CKO mice was analyzed, as previously described (23). Mice at postnatal days 14 to 16 were anesthetized with halothane and decapitated. Brains were quickly removed and transferred to oxygenated, ice-cold cutting medium: 124 mM NaCl, 26 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM glucose, 3 mM KCl, 1.25 mM KH2PO4, 5 mM MgSO4, and 3.4 mM CaCl2. Hippocampal transversal slices (400 m thick) were prepared using a McIlwain-type tissue chopper and transferred to a recovery chamber with a modified artificial cerebrospinal fluid medium, containing: 124 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1.5 mM MgSO4, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 24 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM d-glucose, and saturated with 95% O2/5% CO2 for 1 hour at 37C. Slices were then treated with NMDA (100 M) for 3 hours. At the end of treatment, 50 l of medium solution was transferred to a 96-well plate, and the LDH reaction was performed using the Pierce LDH Cytotoxicity Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturers instruction. To determine LDH activity, the absorbance at 680 nm (background signal) was subtracted from the absorbance at 490 nm. LDH activity was normalized to protein concentration, and results are shown as fold of controls.

The rmTBI model was established in mice following the protocol described in a previous publication (25), with minor changes. Briefly, mice were restrained in a plastic restraint cone (89066-338, VWR International) without anesthesia and placed on a foam bed. The mouse head was not immobilized. This setting better mimics the human concussive injury, which often happens under awake conditions and the head undergoes acceleration and deceleration. A stainless steel helmet (6 mm diameter) (Millenium Machinery, Rochester, NY) was placed on the right hemisphere between the lambda and bregma. A 1.0-mm-thick double-sided gel tape (Scotch) was stick to the underside of the helmet. A pneumatically controlled impactor device (AMS-201, Amscien) was modified to deliver mild closed-head impacts. The impactor tip was replaced with a rubber round tip (6 mm diameter) to reduce the incidence of skull fracture. The impact depth was 5 mm. The impact speed was 3.5 m/s. The duration of impact was 100 ms. The impact angle was 20 from the vertical plane. After impact, mice were removed from the restraint bag and returned to their cage. Mice showing abnormalities, such as signs of pain, motor impairment, or seizures, were rarely seen and were removed from the study. Animals received four head impacts per day with a 2-hour interval between impacts for 10 days. Sham groups underwent the same procedure as the rmTBI groups. They were placed into the restraint cone on the same foam bed. However, no impacts were given.

Osmotic pumps (Model 2002, ALZET; release rate, 0.5 l/hour) were filled with 200 l of C2I (0.625 g/l) in (2-hydroxypropyl)--cyclodextrin (400 mg/ml) or with 200 l of (2-hydroxypropyl)--cyclodextrin (400 mg/ml) as vehicle. Pumps were implanted subcutaneously in mice 1 day before rmTBI and removed 4 days after the last episode of rmTBI (total of 15 days). Approximately, 0.3 mg/kg of C2I was released per day. This dose is the same as the daily dose used for intraperitoneal injections of C2I in a mouse model of TBI (22).

At indicated time points after rmTBI, ipsilateral cortical and hippocampal tissues were collected from WT and C2CKO mice. Tissues were homogenized in lysis buffer (87787, Thermo Fisher Scientific), containing protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (78446, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and protein concentration was measured with the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay (23225, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Western blot was done using the Wes system (ProteinSimple): 1.2 g of total protein of samples was loaded to each lane and 12 to 230 kDa separation modules were used. For the detection of PAD-tau, samples were run under nonreducing conditions. Peak areas of the bands were measured by Compass software (ProteinSimple).

At 1 or 3 months after rmTBI, mice were anesthetized and intracardially perfused with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and then with freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. Brains were removed and immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4C for 1 day for postfixation and then in 15 and 30% sucrose at 4C for 1 day each for cryoprotection. Coronal frozen sections (20 m thick) at bregma 1.58 to 2.30 in each brain were collected. Two sections (at 160-m interval) per animal were evaluated for each specific immunohistochemical analysis. Sections were first blocked in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 5% goat or donkey serum and 0.3% Triton X-100 (blocking solution) for 1 hour and then incubated with primary antibody prepared in blocking solution overnight at 4C. Sections were washed three times in PBS and incubated in Alexa Fluor secondary antibody prepared in blocking solution (1:400) for 2 hours at room temperature. After three washes, sections were mounted with mounting medium containing 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Vector Laboratories). Sections were visualized under confocal microscopy (ZEISS LSM 880). Imaging parameters were constant within each specific antigen analysis. For the quantification of reactive astrocytes, 332 m by 332 m areas from indicated brain regions were analyzed in each GFAP-labeled section. Image threshold was adjusted to highlight astrocytes processes. Astrocytes with 4 processes visible 30 m from the soma were considered as reactive astrocytes and were manually counted in each image. For the quantification of reactive microglia, 332 m by 332 m areas from indicated brain regions of each iba-1labeled section were analyzed. Image threshold was adjusted to highlight microglia soma. Microglia with soma size 28 m2 and circularity 0.6 were considered as reactive microglia and were counted using the Analyze Particles function of ImageJ. For the quantification of p-tau signals, 135 m by 135 m areas from indicated brain regions of each section were analyzed. The thresholded area of each image was measured using ImageJ. For the quantification of p-TDP-43 translocation, 135 m by 135 m areas from indicated brain regions of each section were analyzed. The ratio of the intensity in nuclei to the intensity in cytoplasm was calculated using an ImageJ macro named Intensity Ratio Nuclei Cytoplasm Tool. For the quantification of NeuN-positive cells, 664 m by 249 m areas in the lateral geniculate nucleus and parietal cortex and 166 m by 58 m areas in hippocampal CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus (DG) were analyzed. Image threshold was adjusted, and NeuN-positive nuclei were counted using the Analyze Particles function of ImageJ. Image acquisition and quantification were done by two persons in a blind fashion.

Coronal frozen sections (40 m thick) at bregma 2.30 in each brain were collected. Gallyas silver staining was performed using the FD NeuroSilver Kit II (FD NeuroTechnologies). Areas (444 m by 321 m) at indicated brain regions of each section were imaged under a light microscope (Zeiss Axiophot). The thresholded area of each image was measured using ImageJ. Image acquisition and quantification were done by two persons in a blind fashion.

TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferasemediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling) staining was performed in a set of coronal frozen sections (20 m thick) at bregma 0.50, 0.58, and 1.58 mm using the ApopTag in situ apoptosis detection kit (S7165, Millipore). Sections were visualized under confocal microscopy (LSM 880, Zeiss). All TUNEL-positive nuclei surrounding the lesion area in the sections were counted using the analyze particles function in ImageJ. Total number of TUNEL-positive nuclei in a set of sections of each brain was summed. Image acquisition and quantification were done by two persons in a blind fashion.

The beam apparatus consists of a 1-m wooden round beam with a diameter of 2 cm, resting 50 cm above the tabletop on two poles. A black box is placed at the end of the beam as the finish point. Nesting material from home cages is placed in the black box to attract the mouse to the finish point. A lamp (with 60-W light bulb) is used to shine light above the start point and serves as an aversive stimulus. Each mouse is placed on a brightly lit platform and is allowed to transverse the round beam. A nylon hammock is stretched below the beam, about 7.5 cm above the tabletop, to cushion any falls. On training day, mice are allowed to cross the beam, with gentle guiding or prodding as needed, until they cross readily. The timer is started by the nose of the mouse entering the start point and stopped when the animal reaches the safe box. Mice rest for 10 min in their home cages between training sessions. Mice are trained three times. The beams and box are cleaned of mouse droppings and wiped with towels soaked with 70% ethanol and then water before the next mouse is placed on the apparatus. On testing day, mice are placed on the beam, and numbers of back paw slips and latency to cross are scored. Mice are tested three times with 10-min interval for resting. Results for the three tests are averaged to provide individual values for each mouse on that day. The experiments were performed and results analyzed by a blind observer.

Elevated plus maze for mice was performed following the protocol described in a previous publication (41). Briefly, the maze is painted black and consists of two open arms without walls and two closed arms with 15-cm-high walls. Each arm is 30 cm long and 5 cm wide. The maze is elevated 40 cm off of the floor. Mice were transferred to the behavioral testing room in their home cage 1 hour before the test. At the beginning of the test, mouse was placed at the center of the plus maze, facing an open arm opposite to the location of the operator. The movement of the mouse was recorded by a camera at the top of the maze for 5 min. The mouse was then returned to its home cage. The maze was cleaned with disinfectant and dried with paper towels before testing the next mouse. Video was later analyzed manually. Open-arm time, closed-arm time, open-arm entries, and closed-arm entries were counted. An arm entry was counted when all four paws of the mouse were in that arm. Behavioral test and video analysis were done by two persons in a blind fashion.

The tail suspension test was performed following the protocol described in a previous publication (42). Briefly, the tail suspension box was made of wood and painted white. It is 55 cm high, 60 cm wide, and 11.5 cm deep. It has four compartments to test four mice at a time. A suspension bar (1 cm high, 1 cm wide, and 60 cm long) was positioned on the top of the box. Mice were transferred to the behavioral testing room in their home cage 1 hour before the test. A 17-cm-long tape was attached to the end of the mouse tail. The mice were suspended in each compartment by placing the free end of the tape on the suspension bar. The movement of the mice was recorded for 6 min by a camera in front of the tail suspension box. The mice were then returned to their home cage, and the tape was gently removed from the tail. The box was wiped with disinfectant before the next round of test. Video was later analyzed by another observer. The time that each mouse spends as mobile was measured, following the criteria described in (39). The immobility time was then calculated as total time minus mobility time. Behavioral test and video analysis were done by two persons in a blind fashion.

For fear conditioning, we used the same protocol we used in our previous studies (22). On training day, mice were placed in the fear conditioning chamber (H1011M-TC, Coulbourn Instruments) located in the center of a sound-attenuating cubicle (Coulbourn Instruments). After a 2-min exploration period, one tonefoot shock pairings separated by 1-min intervals were delivered. The 85-dB, 2-kHz tone lasted for 30 s, and the foot shock was 0.75 mA and lasted for 2 s. Foot shock coterminated with the tone. Mice remained in the training chamber for another 30 s before being returned to their home cages. Context test was performed 1 day after training. On day 3, animals were subjected to a cue/tone test. The same conditioning chamber was modified by changing its metal grid floor to a plastic sheet, white metal walls to plastic walls gridded with red tapes, and odor from ethanol to acetic acid. Mice were placed in the altered chamber for 5 min to measure freezing level in the altered context; and after this 5-min period, a tone (85 dB, 2 kHz) was delivered for 1 min to measure freezing to tone. Mice behavior was recorded with the FreezeFrame software and analyzed with FreezeView software (Coulbourn Instruments). Motionless bouts lasting 1 s were considered as freezing. The percentage of time animal froze was calculated, and the group means with SEM and accumulative distribution of percentage freeze were analyzed.

Novel object location tests were performed, as previously described (43). Before training, mice habituated to the experimental apparatus for 5 min in the absence of objects. During habituation, animals were allowed to explore an empty arena. Twenty-four hours after habituation, animals were exposed to the familiar arena, with two identical objects added and allowed to explore for 10 min. During the retention test, mice were allowed to explore the experimental apparatus for 6 min. Exploration was scored when a mouses head was oriented toward the object within a distance of 1 cm or when the nose was touching the object. The relative exploration time was recorded and expressed as a discrimination index [DI = (tnovel tfamiliar)/(tnovel + tfamiliar) 100%]. Mean exploration times were then calculated, and the discrimination indexes between treatment groups were compared. Mice that explored both objects for 3 s in total during either training or testing were removed from further analysis. Mice that demonstrated an object preference during training (DI >20) were also removed.

E. B. Cagmat, J. D. Guingab-Cagmat, A. V. Vakulenko, R. L. Hayes, J. Anagli, Potential Use of Calpain Inhibitors as Brain Injury Therapy. in Brain Neurotrauma: Molecular, Neuropsychological and Rehabilitation Aspects, F. H. Kobeissy, Ed. (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, 2015), Chapter 40.

Acknowledgments: Funding: This work was supported by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs through The Defense Medical Research and Development Program under Award no. W81XWH-19-1-0329. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the U.S. Department of Defense. Grant no. BA170606. Optimization of a selective calpain-2 inhibitor for prolonged field care in traumatic brain injury. X.B. is supported, in part, by funds from the Daljit and Elaine Sarkaria Chair. Author contributions: Y.W., X.B., and M.B. designed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. Y.W., Y.L., A.N., A.S., D.Q., E.Y., and D.R. provided experimental data and analyzed data. Competing interests: M.B., X.B., and Y.W. are cofounders of NeurAegis, a startup company focusing on developing selective calpain-2 inhibitors for the treatment of acute neurodegeneration. M.B. is an inventor on a Provisional Patent New selective calpain-2 inhibitors for the treatment of neurodegeneration. The other authors declare no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.

The rest is here:
Calpain-2 as a therapeutic target in repeated concussioninduced neuropathy and behavioral impairment - Science Advances

Read More...

Prospective randomized trial of interventions for vincristine-related neuropathic pain. – Physician’s Weekly

Monday, July 6th, 2020

To evaluate the efficacy of gabapentin at 20mg/kg per day in the treatment of vincristine-related neuropathic pain.Children aged 1-18years who developed vincristine-induced neuropathy on a St Jude frontline acute lymphoblastic leukemia trial were prospectively enrolled on a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial with two treatment arms: gabapentin plus opioid versus placebo plus opioid. Daily evaluations of morphine dose (mg/kg per day) and pain scores were conducted for up to 21days; the values of the two arms were compared to assess analgesic efficacy.Of 51 study participants, 49 were eligible for analyses. Twenty-five participants were treated with gabapentin, with a mean (SD) dose of 17.97 (2.76) mg/kg per day (median 18.26, range 6.82-21.37). The mean (SD) opioid doses taken, expressed as morphine equivalent daily (mg/kg per day), were 0.26 (0.43) in the gabapentin group (25 patients, 432days) and 0.15 (0.22) in the placebo group (24 patients, 411days; P=.15). Only the risk classification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia was significantly associated with the daily morphine dosage (P=.0178): patients in the lower risk arm received higher daily morphine dosages. Multivariate analyses revealed a significant difference between the groups average daily scores for the previous 24h and right now.In this population of children with vincristine-related neuropathic pain, opioid consumption and pain scores were higher in the gabapentin group than in the placebo group. Future randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies should test gabapentin given longer or at a higher dose. 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

PubMed

Excerpt from:
Prospective randomized trial of interventions for vincristine-related neuropathic pain. - Physician's Weekly

Read More...

Save your feet from diabetic neuropathy: A few tips to keep your feet healthy – TheHealthSite

Monday, June 29th, 2020

Diabetes has assumed epidemic proportions today and millions of people suffer from this condition globally. There may be many causes behind this problem like family history, unhealthy diet and a sedentary lifestyle. Some environmental pollutants may also trigger this condition. It often brings with it many complications like blurry vision, weight loss and excessive thirst. Uncontrolled blood sugar levels over time can result in serious health issues like kidney problems and diabetic retinopathy. Also Read - Diabetes increases your risk of cancer: Experts blame DNA damage

If you have diabetes, you need to take good care of your feet. This is because one of the complications of this condition is diabetic neuropathy. It leads to loss of sensation in your feet and you may be unaware if you have any injury. This happens because fluctuation in blood sugar levels may damage the nerves and vessels of the feet. Unattended injuries can cause gangrene and it may result in loss of a limb. In fact, diabetic neuropathy is the leading cause of amputations in people with diabetes. Also Read - Know how to deal with wounds if you have diabetes

This complication of diabetes may develop over time and you may not notice it immediately. Some people experience a feeling of thickness on their soles. At times, you may also develop open sores and calluses on your soles. If you have an injury, it will take a longer time to heal. A burning sensation on the feet and extreme sensitivity may also be symptoms of diabetic neuropathy. Also Read - Diabetes alert: Beware of dementia and cancer if you have elevated blood sugar levels

If you have this condition, you must be extra careful when it comes to your feet. If you notice any changes in the shape of your feet or any injury that is not healing, seek immediate medical help. This will help you save your feet. One important thing that you need to do is wear the right shoes. There are now many shoes that are especially designed for people with diabetes. These special shoes are deeper than normal shoes. Choose something that is comfortable and fits you well. Make sure that you can wriggle your toes around after wearing your shoes. Avoid wearing heels and fancy open-toed ones. Straps are bad too as it may sometimes cut into your skin and injure you.

Tip: Shop for footwear at the end of the day when your feet may be slightly swollen. This will help you pick a pair that will not be tight around this time of the day.

You can also ask your doctor about wearing compression socks to stimulate circulation in your lower limbs. Other than this, be gentle with your feet and treat them with love and care. Every night before going to bed, make it a point to check your feet properly for any sings of injury. If you notice anything different, get an appointment with your doctor. Be sure to keep your nails trimmed and groomed. You may also give yourself a regular pedicure and use scrubs to exfoliate your feet at frequent intervals. Be sure to wash your feet with warm water before going to bed every night. This night time ritual will go a long way in keeping your feet safe.

Published : June 29, 2020 7:08 pm

Visit link:
Save your feet from diabetic neuropathy: A few tips to keep your feet healthy - TheHealthSite

Read More...

SLE May Have Early Effect on Peripheral Nerve Function Before Electrophysiologic or Clinical Neuropathy Development – Rheumatology Advisor

Monday, June 29th, 2020

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may have an early effect on peripheral nerve function before the development of electrophysiologic or clinical neuropathy, according to study results published in Rheumatology International.

Researchers evaluated data from nerve conduction studies (NCS) in patients with SLE without clinical or electrophysiologic neuropathy and healthy control participants matched by age and sex. Data included sensory nerve action potential (SNAP), sensory nerve conduction velocities, (SNCV), and demographics. Investigators aimed to determine whether SLE could have an even earlier effect on peripheral nerve function before the development of electrophysiologic abnormalities.

A total of 61 patients with SLE without electrophysiologic neuropathy (88.5% women; median disease duration, 8 years) were included in the study. Patients had a median SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score of 3 (range, 0-16). A total of 49.2% of patients had mild disease activity (score, 1-5), and 32.8% showed no active disease (score, 0).

Although NCS results were within the normal range, the researchers found statistically significant differences in several motor and sensory parameters between the patient and control group. Compared with control participants, among patients with SLE, distal compound muscle action potential was significantly lower in the ulnar, fibular, and posterior tibial nerves and motor nerve conduction velocities were significantly slower in the median, ulnar, and fibular nerves. In the sensory NCS, patients with SLE vs control participants showed significantly lower SNAP amplitudes in the sural nerves and slower SNCV in the median, ulnar, and sural nerves. Patients with SLE also had longer minimum F-wave latencies and their H reflexes more frequently absent.

No significant correlations were found between NCS parameters and SLEDAI or disease duration among patients with SLE; however, there were correlations between disease relapses and motor conduction velocities, specifically of the tibial and fibular nerves (r=-0.315; P =.013 and r=-0.426; P =.001).

Researchers noted that NCS measure the function of only large nerve fibers, which may represent a limitation of the study, because small peripheral nerve fibers have also been recognized to be involved in SLE.

Overall, despite having NCS results within a normal range, the data show that patients with SLE without other known causes of neuropathy experienced worse peripheral nerve function. This could suggest that SLE has early negative effects on peripheral nerve function, which supports the possibility that SLE polyneuropathy may gradually progress to development of clinical peripheral neuropathy.

Reference

Fong S-Y, Raja J, Wong K-T, Goh K-J. Systemic lupus erythematosus may have an early effect on peripheral nerve function in patients without clinical or electrophysiological neuropathy: comparison with age- and gender-matched controls [published online June 2, 2020]. Rheumatol Int. doi:10.1007/s00296-020-04610-8

Read more:
SLE May Have Early Effect on Peripheral Nerve Function Before Electrophysiologic or Clinical Neuropathy Development - Rheumatology Advisor

Read More...

Global Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market 2020 Overview with (Covid-19) Impact Analysis of Growth, Competitive landscape and Forecast 2025 – Bandera…

Monday, June 29th, 2020

The recent research report titledGlobalNeuropathy Pain TreatmentMarket Report 2020, Forecast to 2025sheds light on critical aspects of the market by compiling the historical, current, and future outlook of the market and the factors responsible for such growth. The report contains numerical data and certified data, which is gathered from certified sources and market experts. The document offers useful guidelines for players to understand and define their strategies more efficiently in order to assist them to stay ahead of their competitors. The report includes and evaluates all the changes and shifts that are observed in the globalNeuropathy Pain Treatmentmarket. It encompasses data that is derived from historical trends and present market scenarios.

Get Free Sample Report:https://www.magnifierresearch.com/report-detail/39757/request-sample

The report then delivers information on key segmentation of the globalNeuropathy Pain Treatmentmarket including type/product, application, and geography (country/region). All segments are investigated in relation to different factors such as market size, market share, value, growth rate, other quantitative information, and forecast for 2020 to 2025 time period. The report explains market dynamics in the most detailed and easiest possible manner. Mainly, the current and future trends of the market along with opportunities for the new players who are in the process of entering the global market are highlighted in the report. It enlightens crucial details sales, product descriptions, individual market standing, pictorial representation of statistical data, and contact information of the leading companies.

Market By Companies:

The analysts have profiled leading players of the globalNeuropathy Pain Treatmentmarket, keeping in view their recent developments, market share, sales, revenue, areas covered, product portfolios, and other aspects. The report attempts its aim to present the key manufacturers, presenting the sales, revenue, market share, and recent development for key players. The manufacturing cost structure encompasses details about the raw material, manufacturing process analysis, as well as labor costs. Overall, this section lists companies operating in every region, the prevalent competitive landscape and intensity map of key players presence in each region.

In the global market, the following companies are covered:Pfizer, Depomed, Eli Lilly, Endo, Grnenthal Group

Geographically, this report is segmented into different chief territories, containing profits, sales, growth rate and market share (percent) ofNeuropathy Pain Treatmentin the areas listed below:North America (United States, Canada and Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia), South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia etc.), Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa)

Access Full Report:https://www.magnifierresearch.com/report/global-neuropathy-pain-treatment-market-report-2020-forecast-39757.html

Pivotal Highlights of Market:

Customization of the Report:This report can be customized to meet the clients requirements. Please connect with our sales team (sales@magnifierresearch.com), who will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs. You can also get in touch with our executives on +1-201-465-4211 to share your research requirements.

About Us

Magnifier Research is a leading market intelligence company that sells reports of top publishers in the technology industry. Our extensive research reports cover detailed market assessments that include major technological improvements in the industry. Magnifier Research also specializes in analyzing hi-tech systems and current processing systems in its expertise. We have a team of experts that compile precise research reports and actively advise top companies to improve their existing processes. Our experts have extensive experience in the topics that they cover. Magnifier Research provides you the full spectrum of services related to market research, and corroborate with the clients to increase the revenue stream, and address process gaps.

Contact UsMark StoneHead of Business DevelopmentPhone:+1-201-465-4211Email:sales@magnifierresearch.comWeb:www.magnifierresearch.com

Here is the original post:
Global Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market 2020 Overview with (Covid-19) Impact Analysis of Growth, Competitive landscape and Forecast 2025 - Bandera...

Read More...

FTC Takes Dim View of Light Therapy Device – Pain News Network

Monday, June 29th, 2020

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Low level light therapy (LLLT) also known as laser therapy has been touted for years as a treatment for arthritis, neck and back pain, fibromyalgia, neuropathy and even spinal cord injuries.

But in the first case of its kind, the Federal Trade Commission is going to court to get the makers of a light therapy device called the Willow Curve to stop making deceptive claims that it can treat chronic pain.

When LLLT sellers say their devices will relieve pain, theyd better have the scientific proof to back it up, Andrew Smith, Director of the FTCs Bureau of Consumer Protection, said in a statement. People looking for drug-free pain relief deserve truthful information about these products.

In a complaint filed in federal court against the inventors and marketers of the Willow Curve, the FTC alleges that Dr. Ronald Shapiro and David Sutton personally made deceptive claims about the health benefits of the device and falsely claimed it was approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat chronic pain, severe pain and inflammation.

Willow Curve is a curved plastic device that delivers low-level light and mild heat to painful areas. Its been sold online and through retailers and healthcare professionals since 2014, most recently at a price of $799.

In a 2016 commercial, television personality Chuck Woolery said the Willow Curve offers drug free pain relief for the digital age and personally promised that the Curve could change your life.

View post:
FTC Takes Dim View of Light Therapy Device - Pain News Network

Read More...

Therapeutic Options for Peripheral Neuropathy in Parkinson Disease – Neurology Advisor

Thursday, June 18th, 2020

Peripheral neuropathy is frequently seen in patients with Parkinsons disease (PD) and may increase the functional disability in these individuals. A review article published in Neurological Sciences discussed the etiology of peripheral neuropathy in the context of PD.

Previous studies have shown that peripheral neuropathy can adversely affect the lives of patients with PD. As limited data are available on small fiber neuropathy (SFN) and effective treatments for peripheral neuropathy in PD, the current review focused on the etiology, pathological mechanisms, subtypes, and management of the neurological problem in PD.

The exact pathogenic mechanism of neuropathy in PD is not entirely clear and there are many potential factors involved in the disease process, including medication, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and genetic susceptibility.

Diagnosis

The diagnosis is based on clinical findings along with nerve conduction studies and electromyography. As some neuropathies may present with normal findings on peripheral nerves testing, a thorough patient history is vital.

The initial investigation of peripheral neuropathy often includes glucose tolerance testing, fasting glucose levels, measurement of vitamin B12, methylmalonic acid (MMA), homocysteine (Hcy), and serum protein electrophoresis.

The diagnosis of SFN is commonly difficult to be made on the basis of peripheral nerve testing and clinical criteria are more important. Intraepidermal nerve fiber density in skin biopsy or analysis of quantitative sensory testing can help in establishing the diagnosis.

Additional tools that may aid in the diagnosis and severity assessment of SFN include autonomic testing utilizing a variety of reflex tests, intraepidermal electrical stimulation tests, corneal confocal microscopy, and microneurography.

Parkinson Disease Treatment and Neuropathy

Levodopa, the gold standard treatment for PD, may play an important role in the development of peripheral neuropathy . Long-term use of levodopa can lead to increased levels of Hcy and MMA which have been linked to neuropathy, as well as increased risk for cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, and neural tube defects. While many studies have pointed at B12 deficiency as the potential cause for levodopa-associated neuropathy, others suggested that folate deficiency is a more important cause.

As not all patients taking levodopa develop neuropathy, experts have suggested there may be a genetic susceptibility for the development of neuropathy in some patients. Potential candidate genes involved in PN with PD may be the parkin or MTHFR genes.

Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) are additional treatment options that were found to be associated with peripheral neuropathy. Studies have suggested a higher incidence of neuropathy in PD patients treated with duodopa or LCIG. While limited data exist on the risk for SFN, there are reports suggesting an association between LCIG treatment with neuropathy of small fibers.

Administration of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors may attenuate the levodopa-induced increase in plasma Hcy and MMA levels. However, due to the limited available data, more studies are required to better understand the efficacy of COMT inhibitors in preventing peripheral neuropathy.

Treatments of Peripheral Neuropathy

The data on treatment of peripheral neuropathy in PD remain limited and additional studies are needed to explore the benefits of cobalamin injections with folate supplements and COMT inhibitors, especially in levodopa-treated patients. Novel treatment options include electromagnetic and laser therapy.

At this point in time, COMT inhibitors, such as entacapone, are the main treatment options for peripheral neuropathy. One study has shown that the addition of COMT inhibitors may improve levodopa-associated neuropathy. However, as COMT inhibitors were not found to be effective against peripheral neuropathy secondary to causes other than levodopa exposure, other therapeutic options are needed.

Combination of vitamin B12 and methylcobalamin is recommended by some experts in the field and there are reports this may improve pain and paresthesia, but most of the data are based on studies in patients with diabetic neuropathy.

Several enzymes and genetic markers were suggested as therapeutic targets for peripheral neuropathy and have shown promising results. Furthermore, monoclonal antibodies may prove to be useful, as there are reports from patients with malignant tumors in which the combination of bendamustine-rituximab was found to alleviate immune-mediated neuropathies. Early reports have suggested a potential role for ultrasound guided vitamin B12 injections.

Future studies should investigate the toxic effects of elevated Hcy and MMA levels in patients with PD along with viable treatment options that include vitamin B12 and folate therapy. Large scale studies are required in order to understand the role and efficacy of COMT-Is along with other IPD interventions in [peripheral neuropathy], concluded the investigators.

Reference

Paul DA, Qureshi ARM, Rana AQ. Peripheral neuropathy in Parkinsons disease [published online May 1, 2020]. Neurol Sci. doi:10.1007/s10072-020-04407-4

Continue reading here:
Therapeutic Options for Peripheral Neuropathy in Parkinson Disease - Neurology Advisor

Read More...

COVID 19 Impact on Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market 2020 Industry Size, Share, Applications, Manufacturers and Forecasts to 2026 – Farmers Ledger

Thursday, June 18th, 2020

Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market 2020 Industry increasing incidence of neuropathic pain caused by damage or disease affecting the somatosensory nervous system. Growing awareness among patients and increase in the demand for generic drugs boost the market growth. However, severe side effects of opioids and steroids and rising costs of branded drugs might hamper the market growth.

For Sample Copy of this Report @https://www.orianresearch.com/request-sample/956157

Neuropathy Pain Treatment Marketreport offers a comprehensive insight into the development policies and plans in addition to manufacturing processes and cost structures. On the basis of product, this report displays the cost structure, sales revenue, sales volume, gross margin, market share and growth rate.

Report Covers Industry Segment by Manufacturers:

Report Covers Market Segment by Types:

Global Neuropathy Pain Treatment Industry 2020 Market Research Report is spread across 121 pages and provides exclusive vital statistics, data, information, trends and competitive landscape details in this niche sector.

Order Copy of this Report @https://www.orianresearch.com/checkout/956157

Report Covers Market Segment by Applications:

Key Benefits of the Report:

Target Audience:

Inquire more about Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market report @https://www.orianresearch.com/enquiry-before-buying/956157

Research Methodology

The market is derived through extensive use of secondary, primary, in-house research followed by expert validation and third party perspective like analyst report of investment banks. The secondary research forms the base of our study where we conducted extensive data mining, referring to verified data sources such as white papers government and regulatory published materials, technical journals, trade magazines, and paid data sources.

For forecasting, regional demand & supply factor, investment, market dynamics including technical scenario, consumer behavior, and end use industry trends and dynamics, capacity Types, spending were taken into consideration.

We have assigned weights to these parameters and quantified their market impacts using the weighted average analysis to derive the expected market growth rate.

The market estimates and forecasts have been verified through exhaustive primary research with the

Key Industry Participants (KIPs) which typically include:

Table of Content

1 Executive Summary

2 Methodology And Market Scope

3 Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market Industry Outlook

4 Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market By End User

5 Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market Type

6 Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market Regional Outlook

7 Competitive Landscape

End of the report

Disclaimer

About Us

Orian Research is one of the most comprehensive collections of market intelligence reports on the World Wide Web. Our reports repository boasts of over 500000+ industry and country research reports from over 100 top publishers. We continuously update our repository so as to provide our clients easy access to the worlds most complete and current database of expert insights on global industries, companies, and products. We also specialize in custom research in situations where our syndicate research offerings do not meet the specific requirements of our esteemed clients.

See the original post here:
COVID 19 Impact on Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market 2020 Industry Size, Share, Applications, Manufacturers and Forecasts to 2026 - Farmers Ledger

Read More...

Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment Market to witness an impre – News by aeresearch

Thursday, June 18th, 2020

The research report on Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment market Size provides a thorough assessment of this business vertical. As per the study, the market is predicted to accumulate significant revenues and showcase a substantial growth rate during the estimated timeframe.

The Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment market report is a thorough investigation of the industry in terms of consumption and production. The report, based on the production facet, encompasses details regarding the manufacturing structure and profit margins of the renowned manufacturers. The price incurred by the companies to produce, store, and sell one unit of a product across the various geographies over the analysis period are also included in the study.

Speaking of the consumption aspect, the study details the consumption value and consumption volume of the products in question. Data pertaining to the individual sales price along with the import and export patterns spanning various territories are delivered in the report. Additionally, the report also predicts the production and consumption patterns over the assessment period.

Request Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-sample/219125

Key pointers from the competitive landscape:

An outline of the regional landscape:

A brief overview of the product spectrum:

A summary of the application terrain:

In conclusion, the report evaluates the Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment market through multiple classifications and provides thorough information about the upstream raw materials, downstream buyers, and distribution channels established by the various competitors. More importantly, a study of recent market trends, drivers, challenges, and opportunities shaping the profitability graph of the industry are duly presented in the report.

Request Customization on This Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-for-customization/219125

Originally posted here:
Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment Market to witness an impre - News by aeresearch

Read More...

Diet and exercise are first prescription to try for prediabetes – STLtoday.com

Thursday, June 18th, 2020

Your husband is at risk, and the fact that the symptoms are recent means he should look at this as a wake-up call. Changing his lifestyle dramatically now can not only lead to improvement in symptoms (or at least they wont get worse), but it will also reduce his risk of heart attack and stroke.

There are many places to get help: His doctor, a registered dietitian nutritionist and a diabetes nurse educator all are excellent potential sources of information, but he has to make the decision to start the lifestyle change.Vitamins do not help diabetic neuropathy. If he can start making the changes, I hope he will find, as most people have, that his quality of life and sense of well-being are so much better that he will not want to stop his healthier lifestyle. Medications may be helpful, but the primary treatment is diet and exercise.

Dear Dr. Roach My wife smoked for many years and finally quit with the help of nicotine gum that is 4 milligrams each. Since quitting almost 20 years ago, she continues to use about 12 pieces of nicotine gum per day. Does ingesting this much nicotine in this manner put her at risk for developing some type of cancer from the nicotine? T.D.

Answer No, nicotine is not carcinogenic, that is to say cancer-causing. In large doses, it is dangerous, but the doses she is taking are not at least, for a person used to them. Early signs of nicotine toxicity are excess salivation, nausea and vomiting.

Visit link:
Diet and exercise are first prescription to try for prediabetes - STLtoday.com

Read More...

Are Trump’s Problems with Walking, Drinking Water Due to Hydroxychloroquine? – American Council on Science and Health

Thursday, June 18th, 2020

As a vascular surgeon, I am well acquainted with what we call gait disturbances, an abnormal walk. I am sure many of you have seen individuals who have suffered from a stroke with partial loss of their leg, which results in a walk that is less fluid.

There are many diagnostic possibilities responsible for a change in our gait. I am, unfortunately, most familiar with structural alterations, e.g., loss of a portion of the foot, or unequal length of limbs. There can be issues related to injury;think of how we might limp after injuring our knee. And there can be neurologic causes, related to nerve injury, that leave the muscles weaker or altering proprioception the sense of the position of the body in space, which is sensory feedback necessary for balance.

In watching the video of President Trump walking down the ramp, he does seem to be favoring one leg. To be fair, his explanation that is was a slippery incline may indeed be true.

But let's now consider the video of him pausing his speech to drink a bit of water. In the video, the president raises a glass, but he can't quite lift it to his mouth. He tilts his head down to get closer to the glass before using his left hand to fully raise the glass to his lips. From a diagnostic point of view, that changes the differential. Becausewhile the gait disturbance has multiple causes, the lifting of the glass suggests a problem of muscular strength.*

So now, we have issues with two sets of muscles:the legsand arms. It would be odd to have an injury that involved two areas not be reported, especially involvingthe president. The same holds for structural problems, and that moves neuropathy up the differential list. What could be the source of a new-onset neuropathy? I know little of the presidents medical status. That is, except for one, perhaps salient fact:he said he has been taking hydroxychloroquine.

Physicians have rightly been concerned about the cardiac effects of this medication on the hearts rhythm. But hydroxychloroquine has some other, less frequently cited adverse effects. If you read the FDA requiredpackage insertunder adverse effects, here is what you will find:

Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders: Sensorimotor disorder, skeletal muscle myopathy orneuromyopathy leading to progressive weakness and atrophy of proximal muscle groups, depression of tendon reflexes and abnormal nerve conduction. [Emphasis added]

Proximal muscles are those closest to our body, like the muscles of the upper arm that raise the arm and hand. Or the muscles of the thigh that are actively involved in all phases of walking. It is not an overly common adverse side effect.It is probably relatively rare, but a quick search uncovered areviewof 10 cases of hydroxychloroquine associatedneuromyopathy.

Again, let me emphasize that I am not attempting to diagnose an illness without performing both a careful history or physical examination. I am trying to point out a fallacy in the therapeutic use of medications. as there is always a tradeoff between benefits and risk. Always. In reporting on the presidents decision to treat himself with hydroxychloroquine on May 18, the New York Times reported, Mr. Trump continued, explaining that his decision to try the drug was based on one of his favorite refrains: What do you have to lose?

What indeed? It would be ironic that the drug President Trump described as a game-changer might instead turn out to be a gait-changer.

Note

*This, by the way, is a reasonable example of Bayesian thinking, where I adjust my original differential (probabilities) based on further information.

The rest is here:
Are Trump's Problems with Walking, Drinking Water Due to Hydroxychloroquine? - American Council on Science and Health

Read More...

Roach: Diet and exercise are first prescription to try for prediabetes – LubbockOnline.com

Thursday, June 18th, 2020

DEAR DR. ROACH: My husband is a 50-year-old prediabetic who has recently experienced burning feet. He refuses to think it's his high-carb diet (bread three times a day, chips, ice cream) and instead thinks he just needs some vitamins for foot pain. Could you please explain why and how what he eats affects everything he's experiencing? -- Anon.

ANSWER: Diabetic neuropathy is a condition found in people who have had diabetes for years. It causes different symptoms in different people, but pain (often burning in character) and numbness are most common. The underlying cause is uncertain, but seems to be a combination of factors leading to nerve damage.

Prediabetes, often along with the other components of metabolic syndrome -- including high blood pressure, excess abdominal fat and high cholesterol or triglycerides -- may also bring on a neuropathy with very similar symptoms. Other causes, especially vitamin B12 deficiency, are appropriate to evaluate before determining the condition is most likely due to diabetes or prediabetes.

There are no specific treatments for the neuropathy, although there are medications to ease symptoms. Treatment of the underlying metabolic syndrome is therefore of the utmost importance, and the two most important treatments are diet and exercise. Avoiding simple carbohydrates, such as found in bread and chips, or the sugars in ice cream, is paramount. Regular exercise has an independent effect that adds to the effectiveness of the dietary changes.

Your husband is at risk, and the fact that the symptoms are recent means he should look at this as a wake-up call. Changing his lifestyle dramatically now can lead not only to improvement in symptoms (or at least they won't get worse), but it will also reduce his risk of heart attack and stroke.

There are many places to get help: His doctor, a registered dietitian nutritionist and a diabetes nurse educator all are excellent potential sources of information, but he has to make the decision to start the lifestyle change. Vitamins do not help diabetic neuropathy. If he can start making the changes, I hope he will find, as most people have, that his quality of life and sense of well-being are so much better that he will not want to stop his healthier lifestyle. Medications may be helpful, but the primary treatment is diet and exercise.

DEAR DR. ROACH: My wife smoked for many years and finally quit with the help of nicotine gum that is 4 milligrams each. Since quitting almost 20 years ago, she continues to use about 12 pieces of nicotine gum per day. Does ingesting this much nicotine in this manner put her at risk for developing some type of cancer from the nicotine? -- T.D.

ANSWER: No, nicotine is not carcinogenic, that is to say cancer-causing. In large doses, it is dangerous, but the doses she is taking are not -- at least, for a person used to them. Early signs of nicotine toxicity are excess salivation, nausea and vomiting.

There are many toxic substances in tobacco, some of which are cancer-causing. The tobacco does not need to be burned; chewing tobacco and snuff increase the risk of oral cancer. About half of all people who smoke will die because of smoking-related illness. Even one cigarette a day has significant long-term health risks.

Although it's not ideal that she continues to use nicotine gum (and it's not cheap), there is no doubt that the gum is much, much safer for her than continuing to smoke.

Readers may email questions to ToYourGoodHealth@med.cornell.edu. (c) 2020 North America Syndicate Inc.

Originally posted here:
Roach: Diet and exercise are first prescription to try for prediabetes - LubbockOnline.com

Read More...

Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market 2019 Break Down by Top Companies, Countries, Applications, Challenges, Opportunities and Forecast 2026 – Cole of Duty

Tuesday, June 9th, 2020

A new market report by Market Research Intellect on the Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market has been released with reliable information and accurate forecasts for a better understanding of the current and future market scenarios. The report offers an in-depth analysis of the global market, including qualitative and quantitative insights, historical data, and estimated projections about the market size and share in the forecast period. The forecasts mentioned in the report have been acquired by using proven research assumptions and methodologies. Hence, this research study serves as an important depository of the information for every market landscape. The report is segmented on the basis of types, end-users, applications, and regional markets.

The research study includes the latest updates about the COVID-19 impact on the Neuropathy Pain Treatment sector. The outbreak has broadly influenced the global economic landscape. The report contains a complete breakdown of the current situation in the ever-evolving business sector and estimates the aftereffects of the outbreak on the overall economy.

Get Sample Copy with TOC of the Report to understand the structure of the complete report @ https://www.marketresearchintellect.com/download-sample/?rid=275286&utm_source=COD&utm_medium=888

The report also emphasizes the initiatives undertaken by the companies operating in the market including product innovation, product launches, and technological development to help their organization offer more effective products in the market. It also studies notable business events, including corporate deals, mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, partnerships, product launches, and brand promotions.

Leading Neuropathy Pain Treatment manufacturers/companies operating at both regional and global levels:

Sales and sales broken down by Product:

Sales and sales divided by Applications:

The report also inspects the financial standing of the leading companies, which includes gross profit, revenue generation, sales volume, sales revenue, manufacturing cost, individual growth rate, and other financial ratios.

The report also focuses on the global industry trends, development patterns of industries, governing factors, growth rate, and competitive analysis of the market, growth opportunities, challenges, investment strategies, and forecasts till 2026. The Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market was estimated at USD XX Million/Billion in 2016 and is estimated to reach USD XX Million/Billion by 2026, expanding at a rate of XX% over the forecast period. To calculate the market size, the report provides a thorough analysis of the market by accumulating, studying, and synthesizing primary and secondary data from multiple sources.

To get Incredible Discounts on this Premium Report, Click Here @ https://www.marketresearchintellect.com/ask-for-discount/?rid=275286&utm_source=COD&utm_medium=888

The market is predicted to witness significant growth over the forecast period, owing to the growing consumer awareness about the benefits of Neuropathy Pain Treatment. The increase in disposable income across the key geographies has also impacted the market positively. Moreover, factors like urbanization, high population growth, and a growing middle-class population with higher disposable income are also forecasted to drive market growth.

According to the research report, one of the key challenges that might hinder the market growth is the presence of counter fit products. The market is witnessing the entry of a surging number of alternative products that use inferior ingredients.

Key factors influencing market growth:

Reasons for purchasing this Report from Market Research Intellect

Customized Research Report Using Corporate Email Id @ https://www.marketresearchintellect.com/need-customization/?rid=275286&utm_source=COD&utm_medium=888

Customization of the Report:

Market Research Intellect also provides customization options to tailor the reports as per client requirements. This report can be personalized to cater to your research needs. Feel free to get in touch with our sales team, who will ensure that you get a report as per your needs.

Thank you for reading this article. You can also get chapter-wise sections or region-wise report coverage for North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa.

To summarize, the Neuropathy Pain Treatment market report studies the contemporary market to forecast the growth prospects, challenges, opportunities, risks, threats, and the trends observed in the market that can either propel or curtail the growth rate of the industry. The market factors impacting the global sector also include provincial trade policies, international trade disputes, entry barriers, and other regulatory restrictions.

About Us:

Market Research Intellect provides syndicated and customized research reports to clients from various industries and organizations with the aim of delivering functional expertise. We provide reports for all industries including Energy, Technology, Manufacturing and Construction, Chemicals and Materials, Food and Beverage and more. These reports deliver an in-depth study of the market with industry analysis, market value for regions and countries and trends that are pertinent to the industry.

Contact Us:

Mr. Steven Fernandes

Market Research Intellect

New Jersey ( USA )

Tel: +1-650-781-4080

Follow this link:
Neuropathy Pain Treatment Market 2019 Break Down by Top Companies, Countries, Applications, Challenges, Opportunities and Forecast 2026 - Cole of Duty

Read More...

Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market to Grow Significantly With Increasing Advancements in Technology, Says QYR – Cole of Duty

Tuesday, June 9th, 2020

The market research report is a brilliant, complete, and much-needed resource for companies, stakeholders, and investors interested in the global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment market. It informs readers about key trends and opportunities in the global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment market along with critical market dynamics expected to impact the global market growth. It offers a range of market analysis studies, including production and consumption, sales, industry value chain, competitive landscape, regional growth, and price. On the whole, it comes out as an intelligent resource that companies can use to gain a competitive advantage in the global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment market.

Key companies operating in the global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment market include , Pfizer, Depomed, Novartis, Biogen, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Eli Lilly and Company, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Baxter Healthcare, Johnson & Johnson, Teva Pharmaceuticals Peripheral Neuritis Treatment

Get PDF Sample Copy of the Report to understand the structure of the complete report: (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart) :

https://www.qyresearch.com/sample-form/form/1456206/global-peripheral-neuritis-treatment-market

Segmental Analysis

Both developed and emerging regions are deeply studied by the authors of the report. The regional analysis section of the report offers a comprehensive analysis of the global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment market on the basis of region. Each region is exhaustively researched about so that players can use the analysis to tap into unexplored markets and plan powerful strategies to gain a foothold in lucrative markets.

Global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Segment By Type:

, Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN), Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN), Idiopathic Peripheral Neuropathy (IPN), Others

Global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Segment By Application:

, Hospital Pharmacies, Retail Pharmacies, Online Pharmacies

Competitive Landscape

Competitor analysis is one of the best sections of the report that compares the progress of leading players based on crucial parameters, including market share, new developments, global reach, local competition, price, and production. From the nature of competition to future changes in the vendor landscape, the report provides in-depth analysis of the competition in the global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment market.

Key companies operating in the global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment market include , Pfizer, Depomed, Novartis, Biogen, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Eli Lilly and Company, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Baxter Healthcare, Johnson & Johnson, Teva Pharmaceuticals Peripheral Neuritis Treatment

Key questions answered in the report:

For Discount, Customization in the Report: https://www.qyresearch.com/customize-request/form/1456206/global-peripheral-neuritis-treatment-market

TOC

Table of Contents 1 Report Overview1.1 Study Scope1.2 Key Market Segments1.3 Players Covered: Ranking by Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Revenue1.4 Market Analysis by Type 1.4.1 Global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Size Growth Rate by Type: 2020 VS 2026 1.4.2 Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN) 1.4.3 Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) 1.4.4 Idiopathic Peripheral Neuropathy (IPN) 1.4.5 Others1.5 Market by Application 1.5.1 Global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Share by Application: 2020 VS 2026 1.5.2 Hospital Pharmacies 1.5.3 Retail Pharmacies 1.5.4 Online Pharmacies 1.6 Study Objectives 1.7 Years Considered 2 Global Growth Trends by Regions2.1 Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Perspective (2015-2026)2.2 Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Growth Trends by Regions 2.2.1 Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Size by Regions: 2015 VS 2020 VS 2026 2.2.2 Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Historic Market Share by Regions (2015-2020) 2.2.3 Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Forecasted Market Size by Regions (2021-2026) 2.3 Industry Trends and Growth Strategy 2.3.1 Market Top Trends 2.3.2 Market Drivers 2.3.3 Market Challenges 2.3.4 Porters Five Forces Analysis 2.3.5 Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Growth Strategy 2.3.6 Primary Interviews with Key Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Players (Opinion Leaders) 3 Competition Landscape by Key Players3.1 Global Top Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Players by Market Size 3.1.1 Global Top Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Players by Revenue (2015-2020) 3.1.2 Global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Revenue Market Share by Players (2015-2020) 3.1.3 Global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)3.2 Global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Concentration Ratio 3.2.1 Global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI) 3.2.2 Global Top 10 and Top 5 Companies by Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Revenue in 20193.3 Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Key Players Head office and Area Served3.4 Key Players Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Product Solution and Service3.5 Date of Enter into Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market3.6 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans 4 Breakdown Data by Type (2015-2026)4.1 Global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Historic Market Size by Type (2015-2020)4.2 Global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Forecasted Market Size by Type (2021-2026) 5 Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Breakdown Data by Application (2015-2026)5.1 Global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Size by Application (2015-2020)5.2 Global Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Forecasted Market Size by Application (2021-2026) 6 North America6.1 North America Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Size (2015-2020)6.2 Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Key Players in North America (2019-2020)6.3 North America Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Size by Type (2015-2020)6.4 North America Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 7 Europe7.1 Europe Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Size (2015-2020)7.2 Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Key Players in Europe (2019-2020)7.3 Europe Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Size by Type (2015-2020)7.4 Europe Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 8 China8.1 China Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Size (2015-2020)8.2 Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Key Players in China (2019-2020)8.3 China Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Size by Type (2015-2020)8.4 China Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 9 Japan9.1 Japan Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Size (2015-2020)9.2 Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Key Players in Japan (2019-2020)9.3 Japan Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Size by Type (2015-2020)9.4 Japan Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 10Key Players Profiles10.1 Pfizer 10.1.1 Pfizer Company Details 10.1.2 Pfizer Business Overview and Its Total Revenue 10.1.3 Pfizer Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Introduction 10.1.4 Pfizer Revenue in Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Business (2015-2020)) 10.1.5 Pfizer Recent Development10.2 Depomed 10.2.1 Depomed Company Details 10.2.2 Depomed Business Overview and Its Total Revenue 10.2.3 Depomed Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Introduction 10.2.4 Depomed Revenue in Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Business (2015-2020) 10.2.5 Depomed Recent Development10.3 Novartis 10.3.1 Novartis Company Details 10.3.2 Novartis Business Overview and Its Total Revenue 10.3.3 Novartis Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Introduction 10.3.4 Novartis Revenue in Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Business (2015-2020) 10.3.5 Novartis Recent Development10.4 Biogen 10.4.1 Biogen Company Details 10.4.2 Biogen Business Overview and Its Total Revenue 10.4.3 Biogen Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Introduction 10.4.4 Biogen Revenue in Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Business (2015-2020) 10.4.5 Biogen Recent Development10.5 GlaxoSmithKline 10.5.1 GlaxoSmithKline Company Details 10.5.2 GlaxoSmithKline Business Overview and Its Total Revenue 10.5.3 GlaxoSmithKline Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Introduction 10.5.4 GlaxoSmithKline Revenue in Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Business (2015-2020) 10.5.5 GlaxoSmithKline Recent Development10.6 Sanofi 10.6.1 Sanofi Company Details 10.6.2 Sanofi Business Overview and Its Total Revenue 10.6.3 Sanofi Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Introduction 10.6.4 Sanofi Revenue in Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Business (2015-2020) 10.6.5 Sanofi Recent Development10.7 Eli Lilly and Company 10.7.1 Eli Lilly and Company Company Details 10.7.2 Eli Lilly and Company Business Overview and Its Total Revenue 10.7.3 Eli Lilly and Company Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Introduction 10.7.4 Eli Lilly and Company Revenue in Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Business (2015-2020) 10.7.5 Eli Lilly and Company Recent Development10.8 Bristol-Myers Squibb 10.8.1 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Details 10.8.2 Bristol-Myers Squibb Business Overview and Its Total Revenue 10.8.3 Bristol-Myers Squibb Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Introduction 10.8.4 Bristol-Myers Squibb Revenue in Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Business (2015-2020) 10.8.5 Bristol-Myers Squibb Recent Development10.9 Baxter Healthcare 10.9.1 Baxter Healthcare Company Details 10.9.2 Baxter Healthcare Business Overview and Its Total Revenue 10.9.3 Baxter Healthcare Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Introduction 10.9.4 Baxter Healthcare Revenue in Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Business (2015-2020) 10.9.5 Baxter Healthcare Recent Development10.10 Johnson & Johnson 10.10.1 Johnson & Johnson Company Details 10.10.2 Johnson & Johnson Business Overview and Its Total Revenue 10.10.3 Johnson & Johnson Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Introduction 10.10.4 Johnson & Johnson Revenue in Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Business (2015-2020) 10.10.5 Johnson & Johnson Recent Development10.11 Teva Pharmaceuticals 10.11.1 Teva Pharmaceuticals Company Details 10.11.2 Teva Pharmaceuticals Business Overview and Its Total Revenue 10.11.3 Teva Pharmaceuticals Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Introduction 10.11.4 Teva Pharmaceuticals Revenue in Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Business (2015-2020) 10.11.5 Teva Pharmaceuticals Recent Development 11Analysts Viewpoints/Conclusions 12Appendix12.1 Research Methodology 12.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach 12.1.2 Data Source12.2 Disclaimer12.3 Author Details

About Us:

QYResearch always pursuits high product quality with the belief that quality is the soul of business. Through years of effort and supports from huge number of customer supports, QYResearch consulting group has accumulated creative design methods on many high-quality markets investigation and research team with rich experience. Today, QYResearch has become the brand of quality assurance in consulting industry.

Read the original:
Peripheral Neuritis Treatment Market to Grow Significantly With Increasing Advancements in Technology, Says QYR - Cole of Duty

Read More...

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market is Anticipated to Increase Owing to a Rich and Robust Pipeline – Press Release – Digital Journal

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2020

"Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market"

According to DelveInsight, the Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market in 7MM was found to be approximately USD 2,275.52 Million in 2017 and is set to increase by 2030.

Geography Covered

Study Period: 20172030

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Disease Overview

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) also known Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN) is defined as the symptoms and/or signs of peripheral nerve dysfunction and nerve damage in diabetic patients after the exclusion of other causes. It is a predominantly sensory neuropathy with autonomic nervous system involvement, although there are often motor features with advancing disease.

As per the American Diabetes Association, most common among diabetic neuropathies are chronic DPN, accounting for about 75% of the diabetic neuropathies.

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Epidemiology

DelveInsights estimations suggests the total prevalent cases of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in the 7MM was found to be approximately 25,332,829 in 2017.

The disease epidemiology covered in the report provides historical as well as forecasted epidemiology (Total Diagnosed Prevalence of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in 7MM, Gender-Specific Prevalence of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in 7MM, Total Diagnosed Prevalence of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in 7MM), scenario of Total Diagnosed Prevalence of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in 7MM in the 7MM covering United States, EU5 countries (Germany, Spain, Italy, France and United Kingdom) and Japan from 20172030.

Visit to know more about the report: https://www.delveinsight.com/report-store/diabetic-peripheral-neuropathy-market

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market: Treatment and Emerging Therapies

The rising global burden of diabetes is spurring an increase in the prevalence of diabetic neuropathy and neuropathic pain. At present, there are no FDA-approved pathogenetic therapies for DPN and the efficacy of treatments for painful DPN is limited.

The management of pain remains the key aspect of symptom treatment for DPN. The current medications fall into categories, such as antidepressants, anticonvulsants, topical agents and opioids. Antidepressants are further divided into selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) group.

Treatments currently approved by both FDA and EMA for pain associated with DPN includepregabalin, duloxetine, and extended-release tapentadol and capsaicin 8% patch. However, no treatments have been approved for the prevention or reversal of DPN.

According to DelveInsight, the Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market in 7MM was found to be approximately USD 2,275.52 Million in 2017 and is set to increase by 2030.

Request for sample pages: https://www.delveinsight.com/sample-request/diabetic-peripheral-neuropathy-market

Of the emerging therapies, the most anticipated product to get launched is VM202 Apart from this, other products include VM202 (Helixmith), NYX-2925 (Aptinyx), WST-057 (4% pirenzepine) WinSanTor, Inc.), Ricolinostat (Regenacy Pharmacuticals), NRD.E1 (Novaremed Ltd.), Ebranopadol (Grnenthal GmbH), GRC 17356 (Glenmark Pharmaceuticals), and others are also expected to enter the market by 2030 as effective therapies.

The key pharma players working in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market are:

1. Helixmith,

2. Aptinyx

3. WinSanTor, Inc

4. Regenacy Pharmacuticals

5. Ichnos Science

6. Novaremed

7. Grnenthal GmbH

8. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals

9. AstraZeneca

10. Angelini

And many others

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Report Insights

Table of Contents

1. Key Insights

2. Executive summary

3. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market Overview at a Glance

4. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Epidemiology and Market Methodology

5. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Disease Background and Overview

6. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Epidemiology and Patient Population

7. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment and Management

8. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Unmet needs

9. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Marketed Drugs

10. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Emerging drugs

11. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market Size

12. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Reimbursement policies

13. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market Drivers

14. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market Barriers

15. SWOT Analysis

16. KOL Views

17. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Case Report

18. A Case Report of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

19. Bibliography

20. Appendix

21. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Report Methodology

22. DelveInsight Capabilities

23. Disclaimer

24. About DelveInsight

About DelveInsight

DelveInsight is a premier Business Consulting and Market Research firm focused exclusively on the life science segment. With a wide array of smart end-to-end solutions, the firm helps the global Pharmaceutical and Bio-Tech companies formulate prudent business decisions for better growth in the market.

Browse through our vast repository

Media ContactCompany Name: DelveInsight Business Research LLPContact Person: Vinita Rakheja Email: Send EmailPhone: 9193216187Address:304 S. Jones Blvd #2432 City: AlbanyState: New YorkCountry: United StatesWebsite: http://www.delveinsight.com/

See more here:
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market is Anticipated to Increase Owing to a Rich and Robust Pipeline - Press Release - Digital Journal

Read More...

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market is Expected to Increase with a CAGR of 12% for the Study Period of 2017-2030: DelveInsight – PRNewswire

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2020

LAS VEGAS, June 2, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market will increase because of the rising global burden of diabetes that is driving prevalence of diabetic neuropathy, advancement in early diagnosis as well as launch of the promising therapies which will positively impact DPN market.

DelveInsight added a new report titled "Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy MarketInsights, Epidemiology, and Market Forecast-2030" to its portfolio.

Key Highlights from Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market report are:

Request for sample pages to know more onDiabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Epidemiology and Market Forecast

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy is a painful condition that is caused by nerve damage from diabetes. It is a common prevalent complication in neurological damage of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.

There is a huge patient population pool affected by the disease; the Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy market report covers the disease epidemiology that is segmented into Total Diagnosed Prevalent Cases of DPN, Total Prevalent Cases of Painful DPN and Gender-specific Prevalent cases of DPN in the 7MM from 2017 to 2030.

The total Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Prevalent Cases were 3,857,945 in the United States in 2020. Also, females are more affected by the disease as compared to males for Diabetic Peripheral NeuropathyPrevalent in the US in 2020.

Click here to know more onDiabetic Peripheral Neuropathypipeline

Among the 7MM, the US accounts for 58% of the overall market size of DPN. Among the EU-5 countries, Germany accounts for the highest market size for DPN. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy market has a diverse pipeline with several promising therapies. Also, Gene therapy has been developed for DPN pain management. Of the emerging therapies, the most anticipated product to get launched is VM202 Apart from this, other products include VM202 (Helixmith), NYX-2925 (Aptinyx), WST-057 (4% pirenzepine) (WinSanTor, Inc.), Ricolinostat (Regenacy Pharmacuticals), NRD.E1 (Novaremed Ltd.), Cebranopadol (Grnenthal GmbH), GRC 17356 (Glenmark Pharmaceuticals), and others are also expected to enter the market by 2030 as effective therapies. The potential launch of these emerging drugs will aid in overall market growth. There are a couple of market drivers which will be driving the market. One such factor will be an early diagnosis of the DPN because of the advancements happening in the DPN diagnostic approaches. As the patient pool for diabetic peripheral neuropathy is quite large, and there is no treatment for reversal of disease, this indication withholds a plethora of opportunities for drug development companies. No doubt that the clinical pipeline contains a large number of drugs; however, previously multiple clinical trial failures gave a setback and limited the research and development in the DPN domain. So far it has been clear that path traversed is not easy in DPN research as the long-term clinical trials and low success rate in meeting the clinical endpoints may become threats for the investors to fund further.

There aremany key players robustly involved in developing potential drugs and they are a ray of hopefor DPN patients such as:1. VM2022. NYX-29253. WST-0574. Ricolinostat5. ISC 175366. NRD135S.E17. Cebranopadol8. GRC 173569. MEDI735210. Trazodone/GabapentinAnd many others

The key players involved in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy market are:1. Helixmith2. Aptinyx3. WinSanTor, Inc4. Regenacy Pharmacuticals5. Ichnos Science6. Novaremed7. Grnenthal GmbH8. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals9. AstraZeneca10. AngeliniAnd many others

The reasons for buying Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy market report:

Table of contents

1. Key Insights

2. Executive summary

3. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market Overview at a Glance

4. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Epidemiology and Market Methodology

5. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Disease Background and Overview

6. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Epidemiology and Patient Population

6.1. Key Findings

6.2. Total Diagnosed Prevalent cases of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in 7MM

6.3. United States

6.4. EU5

6.5. Germany

6.6. France

6.7. Italy

6.8. Spain

6.9. United Kingdom

6.10. Japan

7. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment and Management

8. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Unmet need

9. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Marketed Drugs

9.1. Key cross competition

9.2. Qutenza: Grnenthal

9.3. Tarlige: Daiichi Sankyo

10. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Emerging drugs

10.1. Key cross competition

10.2. VM202: Helixmith

10.3. NYX-2925: Aptinyx

10.4. WST-057: WinSanTor

10.5. Ricolinostat: Regenacy Pharmaceuticals

10.6. Cebranopadol: Grnenthal

10.7. ISC 17536: Ichnos Science

10.8. NRD135S.E1: Novaremed

10.9. MEDI7352: AstraZeneca

10.10. Trazodone/Gabapentin: Angelini

11. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market Size

11.1. Key Findings

11.2. Total Market Size of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in 7MM

11.3. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market Outlook: 7 MM

11.4. United States

11.5. EU5

11.6. Germany

11.7. France

11.8. Italy

11.9. Spain

11.10. United Kingdom

11.11. Japan

12. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Reimbursement policies

13. Market Drivers

14. Market Barriers

15. SWOT Analysis

16. KOL Views

17. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Case Report

18. A Case Report of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

19. Bibliography

20. Appendix

21. Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Report Methodology

22. DelveInsight Capabilities

23. Disclaimer

24. About DelveInsight

Request a WebEx Demo to get a walk-through of the Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market Report:https://www.delveinsight.com/sample-request/diabetic-peripheral-neuropathy-market

Related Reports:

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Epidemiology Forecast-2030 report delivers an in-depth understanding of the disease, historical, forecasted epidemiology trends of DPN in the 7 MM.

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Pipeline Insight, 2020 report by DelveInsight outlays comprehensive insights of present clinical development scenario and growth prospects across the Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy market.

About DelveInsight

DelveInsight is a premier Business Consulting and Market Research firm, focused exclusively on the life science segment. With a wide array of smart end-to-end solutions, the firm helps the global Pharmaceutical, Bio-Tech and Medical devices companies formulate prudent business decisions for improving their performances to stay ahead of the competitors.

Contact us:

Shruti Thakur[emailprotected]+91-9650213330DelveInsight

SOURCE DelveInsight Business Research, LLP

More here:
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Market is Expected to Increase with a CAGR of 12% for the Study Period of 2017-2030: DelveInsight - PRNewswire

Read More...

Page 13«..10..12131415..20..»


2024 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick