header logo image


Page 1,051«..1020..1,0501,0511,0521,053..1,0601,070..»

Lion’s Club offers clear vision for students – Rapid City Journal

April 18th, 2017 7:48 pm

Vision screening program discovers eye problems early

HOT SPRINGS The Hot Springs Lions Club was helping Hot Springs Elementary students see clearly into their futures Tuesday morning, April 11.

A team of specially trained Lions Club volunteers, sporting yellow vests, implemented a free vision screening program, Lions KIDSIGHT South Dakota, at the elementary school. The effort is part of a statewide program provided free for children ages 12 months and up.

Using a specialized screening machine that peers inside the eyes, Pinky Horner, Program Coordinator for KIDSIGHT South Dakota, and six Lions Club members Gary Merkel, Perry Holmes, Chuck Kraus, Gene Nachtigall, Ed Renstrom and Leon Melstad were helping elementary students discover the status of their vision.

A student entered the room, gave a Lion his orange sticker and had his or her named checked on a list of students who were to be screened. (Parental consent was required with all screenings.) The student sat in a chair in front of a Lions Club member who held the screening machine, which looked something like an old Polariod camera.

The room door was closed, the lights turned off and the students eyes were scanned from several feet away.

From the students point of view, sitting in the chair, they saw colored lights that flashed patterns.

From the perspective of the scanner operator, an image of the students eyes appeared on the scanners screen.

Within seconds, the accurate information the scanner collected was sent to a printer, and each student scanned received a precise evaluation of their eyesight, with a prescription for correction if this was necessary. No physical contact was made with the student, and no eye drops were needed.

The scanning could be done with glasses on or off, and the glasses-wearing Lions Club members who tried the machine out on themselves, said their scans were spot-on in terms of diagnosing vision abnormalities.

The Lions Club has traditionally made efforts to improve vision across the nation, but why is vision screening important for young kids?

According to Lions KIDSIGHT South Dakota, the first few years of a childs life are critical in the development of good vision.

Preschoolers should have their vision checked for issues such as misaligned eyes, and problems that need correction with eyeglasses. These problems are not always evident by simply looking at a child, and children often compensate for vision problems so well that parents, teachers, even pediatricians may be unaware of a problem.

By the time a child is old enough to be in primary grades, many of these common vision-robbing conditions can no longer be effectively treated.

Because the eye is almost completely developed by the time a child is six years old, early detection of vision issues is mandatory in enabling critical physical and mental development and preventing sight-robbing diseases.

Less than 20 percent of children receive a comprehensive eye exam prior to age six, according to Lions KIDSIGHT South Dakota. Studies show that during a childs first 12 years, 80 percent of all learning is obtained visually. And down the road, studies indicate 70 percent of juvenile delinquents are found to have a vision problem.

A lazy eye, amblyopia, for example can develop when an undetected vision problem goes untreated during a childs formative years. The incidence of amblyopia in the U.S. is estimated to be 3 to 5 percent of the population. Vision problems can also result in learning difficulties as a child enters the primary grades.

Other problems scanning can detect include: Myopia (near-sightedness), hyperopia (far-sightedness) astigmatism (blurred vision), aniscoria (pupil size deviations) strabismus (lazy eye), anisometropia (unequal refractive power).

The Lions Clubs KIDSIGHT program, has referred hundreds of children to an eye doctor for further examination and treatment. Most parents of those children had no idea their child had any problems with their eyes. However, with this program, the parents were able to get their child the medical care they needed.

Lion Gary Merkel said the KIDSIGHT program would be scanning pre-schoolers at The Discovery Zone on Thursday, April 13, and then returning in the fall to screen pre-schoolers, kindergarteners, and third and fifth graders in the fall.

See more here:
Lion's Club offers clear vision for students - Rapid City Journal

Read More...

Police open fire before football derby in Argentina, with one fan fighting to save eyesight later another … – The Sun

April 18th, 2017 7:48 pm

THE terrifying moment police opened fire on football fans in Argentina has been caught on camera.

It occurred before the same derby between Atletico Belgrano and Talleres in which a fan was thrown over a railing and died of his injuries in hospital.

Argentinian news outlet, Ole, report a man named Diego Frydman was hit with a bullet in his eye.

Keep up to date with ALL the football news, gossip and transfers

And he was rushed to hospital for an operation to save his vision and movement.

It is as yet unclear why the local police in Cordoba opened fire, but it happened as the Talleres bus was pulling into Mario Alberto Kempes stadium.

Mundo D

Mundo D

Mundo D

The shocking incident tops off a dark day in Argentinian football.

A 22-year-old Belgrano fan named Emanuel Ezequiel Balbo was pushed to his death at half-time of the encounter by fellow fans.

His father, Raul, late claimed the killer was a man named Oscar Gomez, who five years over had fatally run over his other son.

Emanuel Ezequiel Balbo was attacked by man who allegedly killed his brother

Emanuel was thrown over a railing and fell down the stand after it he had reportedly been falsely accused of supporting Talleres.

Four have been arrested over the incident.

Fans of both clubs have moved to end the violence which has plagued this fixture.

The Argentinian ambassador for Ecuador is an avid Bergano follower, and he tweeted a picture of himself covering one eye, which simulates a Pirate and their nickname isPiratas.

Several fans of Talleres, their arch-rivals, replicated the gesture, and Belgrano supporters responded with images of themselves making a T sign along with the hashtag #WeAreNotEnemies.

Go here to read the rest:
Police open fire before football derby in Argentina, with one fan fighting to save eyesight later another ... - The Sun

Read More...

Diabetes in the Valley: Area families hit hard by condition – Sunbury Daily Item

April 18th, 2017 7:47 pm

LEWISBURG Pamela Dixon of Shamokin Dam recently celebrated her 39th birthday. Christy Kerstetter of McAlisterville will turn 39 years old this July.

Both women are married and are raising boys.

Both women are also diabetic. Dixon is a Type 1, and Kerstetter is a Type 2.

So whats the difference and how does it impact each womans life?

Karen Dohl, PA-C, Diabetes Center of Evangelical, West Branch Medical Center explained the difference.

A Type 1 scenario is an autoimmune disease or a situation where the body is attacking itself.

They develop antibodies that kill off an area of the pancreas and the patient needs insulin to sustain life, Dohl said, adding that it is not curable.

A Type 2 diabetic has a high blood sugar level because the pancreas can not keep up with the body. This can be due to being overweight or other health issues and is often genetic.

Some patients no longer produce insulin on their own, Dohl said. When that happens, the Type 2 patient becomes what is known as Type 2 insulin dependent.

Dohl said sometimes patients get confused and think that if they need insulin they must be a Type 1.

All Type 1 diabetics need insulin on a regular basis to survive, but only some Type 2 patients reach this point.

Many Type 1 patients are diagnosed around the age of puberty.

Dr. John Kennedy specializes in Diabetes and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and is employed within the Geisinger Health System in Danville.

He explained that at puberty a relative lack of insulin becomes absolute in these patients. He said that Type 1 can be diagnosed at any age, as early as toddlerhood; though this age group makes up one percent of Type 1 diagnosis. This is the subject of a study currently taking place at Geisinger that involves board certified pediatric endocrinologists.

Dixon was 11 years old when she pre-diagnosed herself while reading The Babysitters Club series. It was a book about the character Stacey and her diagnosis of diabetes that made Dixon think her own situation was similar.

Dixon had the same symptoms as the character in the book: excessive thirst and urination and constant fatigue.

A trip to the hospital with her mother revealed her suspicions were true.

Renee Hughes, RN, BSN, CDE, Diabetes Educator, Diabetes Center of Evangelical, West Branch Medical Center revealed the Four Cardinal Symptoms of a diabetic, includimg the frequent urination, excessive thirst fatigue and also blurred vision.

A blood test confirms the diagnosis. A blood sugar level of 126 or higher is considered diabetic. An A1C test tells the patient the average level of blood sugar over three months. Diabetic, Hughes said, is an A1C of 6.5 or higher.

Kerstetter was diagnosed in 2008 with Type 2 diabetes. The 30-year-olds main complaint at the time was intense fatigue. Upon visiting her family doctor, a blood test was taken and revealed she was Type 2 diabetic, a condition that has occurred in her fathers side of the family.

She was given pills to take not insulin and continued on that pattern for six years.

Hughes said pills that help reduce blood sugar levels are the typical first step for new Type 2 diagnosis. If the pills do not seem to help over time, injections may be prescribed. A type 2 diabetic taking injections is not necessarily taking insulin. Some injections aid in controlling the blood sugar by helping your pancreas produce the insulin naturally.

Kerstetter said this is the medication route she is currently subscribed to. In 2014 after a hospital stay for some complications with her kidneys, her new family doctor began an active look at her numbers on a regular basis to find the medication that worked best for her.

Kerstetter still takes two pills at higher doses than when she was diagnosed as well as the once-per-week injection of Tanzeum after unsuccessful results with other injections.

Dixon, meanwhile, has learned her lesson on how important it is to take her insulin regularly.

As a teenager, she said, she was not overly thrilled to be seen carrying a syringe and vile.

She said by her early 20s, after she got married, she was more compliant to take her medication because the pen form of insulin was available.

Very rarely do we have patients choose to use insulin shots, Kennedy said, It now all about the insulin pens.

Another option is an insulin pump, which Dixon said she has not used.

A catheter is placed under the skin and the pump, a small device, can be carried under a waistband and is programmed to give the correct amount of insulin required. The insulin can be adjusted as needed by pressing buttons.

However, it was the implementation of the Dexcom, Dixon said, that has changed her life. The Dexcom CGM or Continuous Glucose Monitor includes a sensor that is attached discretely to the body and then displays the glucose levels to a monitor that can be checked over 200 times a day. It can also be used in collaboration with the pump.

There is also a share option for patients to have their levels displayed on a spouses cell phone or for parents of children who need insulin.

Since Type 2 is the only preventable form of diabetes, Dohl said the key is to keep your weight under control and think about your lifestyle. She also said most patients do not consider diabetes. They often visit the doctor because they may have fainted or have blurred vision and go home with a diabetic diagnosis.

As many as 8.1 million Americans have diabetes and dont know it, Hughes said.

When symptoms arise, see your doctor and get bloodwork, they said.

Link:
Diabetes in the Valley: Area families hit hard by condition - Sunbury Daily Item

Read More...

Program identifies risky diabetic drivers and helps them improve – Reuters

April 18th, 2017 7:47 pm

(Reuters Health) - A short questionnaire can identify drivers with type 1 diabetes who are at high risk of future driving mishaps, and an online intervention can help them avoid these mishaps, according to a U.S. study.

Like pilots who have to go through a pre-flight checklist to ensure all systems are a go, drivers with diabetes should go through a check list, asking themselves whether they have had more physical activity, taken more insulin, eaten fewer carbohydrates than usual, feel any unusual symptoms and judge whether they are low or likely to go low during the drive, said lead author Dr. Daniel Cox from the University of Virginia Health System and Virginia Driving Safety Laboratory in Charlottesville.

If the answer is yes, then they should take appropriate steps to avoid hypoglycemia while driving, Cox said by email.

Drivers with type 1 diabetes have a greater risk of collisions than their spouses without diabetes, and those mishaps correspond to the use of insulin pumps, a history of collisions, severe low blood sugar (hypoglycemia) and previous hypoglycemia-related driving mishaps, the study team writes in Diabetes Care.

The researchers developed an 11-item questionnaire to screen drivers with type 1 diabetes for a high risk of driving mishaps and developed an online intervention intended to help high-risk individuals avoid future mishaps.

Their Risk Assessment of Diabetic Drivers (RADD) scale included questions about past experiences while driving, like have you had an automobile accident or received a moving vehicle violation in the last 2 years? and diabetes-specific questions like, have you had low blood glucose in the past 6 months? and was it a hassle trying to hide dizziness or other symptoms of low blood glucose?

Based on answers to 11 questions, around 35 percent of individuals with type 1 diabetes could be classified as high-risk drivers whose mishap rate was nearly three times higher than that of people in the low-risk group.

High-risk drivers who went on to participate in the online intervention at DiabetesDriving.com had a driving mishap rate of about 2.5 per year in the following 12 months, compared with about 4.25 mishaps per year among high-risk drivers who did not participate in the intervention. Still, the mishap rate of high-risk drivers who did the intervention remained higher than that of low-risk drivers.

Driving is a privilege, not a right, Cox said. Whether we have type 1 diabetes, sleep apnea, narcolepsy, slowed reaction times due to aging, or some other chronic or acute condition (e.g., excessive sleepiness or intoxication), we all have a responsibility to ourselves, our families, and others on the road to ensure we are a safe driver.

People with diabetes should realize they should never drive when their blood glucose is below 70, because it is too easy to slip from mild hypoglycemia to moderate hypoglycemia that impairs judgment, information processing speed, and general reaction time, Cox added. As soon as hypoglycemia is detected or suspected, the driver should immediately safely pull off the road, treat it, and not resume driving until the hypoglycemia resolves.

Diabetic patients have a tendency not to disclose their driving mishaps or near miss events due to fear of losing their driving licenses," said Dr. Thinzar Min from Swansea University in the UK, who was not involved in the study.

In the UK, drivers are allowed only one severe hypoglycemic episode in 12 months to retain Group 1 license (cars and motorcycles) and no severe hypoglycemic episodes for Group 2 licenses (trucks and busses), Min noted.

I think the RADD scale would be more accurate if the patients can use it to assess themselves if they are high-risk or not, she said. Online interventions should be aimed at all diabetic patients who are taking insulin.

Dr. Eitaro Nakashima from Chubu Rosai Hospitalin Nagoya, Japan, wrote recently about the pitfalls of tightening driving regulations for diabetic patients in Japan and Europe. "In my opinion, each patient should understand the degree of risk of driving mishaps and prepare sugar in their car. For general public, education and individual customized treatment are important for good outcome instead of tightening of driving regulations, he told Reuters Health by email.

SOURCE: bit.ly/2oJgxvQ Diabetes Care, online April 12, 2017.

(Reuters Health) - People who live near sources of heavy traffic exhaust may be at higher risk of heart disease because the fine particles in this type of pollution lower levels of good cholesterol needed for healthy blood flow, a U.S. study suggests.

U.S. generic drug company Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC said on Tuesday it had reached an agreement with Allergan Plc that settles a patent dispute over the generic version of Allergan's eye drug, Restasis.

Continued here:
Program identifies risky diabetic drivers and helps them improve - Reuters

Read More...

Cars? Diabetes? Is Apple A Dinosaur? – Seeking Alpha

April 18th, 2017 7:47 pm

Recently, Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) has been making headlines with a couple exciting new growth initiatives. Last week the company was granted a permit to test self-driving cars in California, and news surfaced that Apple is working on a glucose sensor to help diabetes patients.

While Apple has been focusing on these distant moonshots with little to no near-term revenue impact, their core business is quickly becoming vulnerable.

Amazon's (NASDAQ:AMZN) Alexa platform is ushering a new era of interacting with computers through voice, not touch. This is something Apple tried to do with Siri, but is miserably failing.

Instead of investing in these long-term projects, Apple needs to double down and innovate around protecting its moat around its iOS ecosystem. Building healthcare services and media content (like Planet of the Apps) would be a great start, instead of wasting time trying to compete with Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) in self-driving cars.

All of this and more is covered in HyperChange's weekly Sunday Schemin' podcast.

Disclosure: I am/we are long TSLA.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Visit link:
Cars? Diabetes? Is Apple A Dinosaur? - Seeking Alpha

Read More...

19-year old Georgia college student dies of diabetes complication – FOX 5 Atlanta

April 18th, 2017 7:47 pm

COLUMBUS, Ga. - Looking around Marquis House's bedroom in his family's Columbus, Georgia, home, it almost feels like he's still here, like he's going to walk in the door any second.

"This is all his dirty laundry; I haven't had the heart to wash it," Chereia House, his mother, says. "This is his (insulin) pen right here. His glasses he wore to school."

House spends a lot of time in here, remembering Marquis.

"I think about him," she says. "I think about his personality."

Marquis was 19, a diehard New England Patriots' fan in Falcons' country.

He was a University of West Georgia sophomore, and a video-gamer, who still got a kick out of dressing up for the family's pajama costume Christmas photo.

Marquis was also a type 1 diabetic, drilled in staying on top of his blood sugar.

"He was diagnosed when he was 4 years old," his mother remembers. "He was doing his own injections at 4, he was counting his carbs at 5."

So, losing Marquis to a complication of diabetes?

It just doesn't seem possible.

"Because he was so on top of it," Chereia House says. "He knew what to do, he always knew what to do."

And Type 1 diabetes requires a constant balancing act, says Children's Healthcare of Atlanta endocrinologist Dr. Jessica Hutchins.

"Most kids with Type 1 diabetes are taking 4 to 6 injections of insulin a day, depending on how often they're eating and how well their blood sugars are doing," Dr. Hutchins explains.

On February 11, 2017, a Saturday night, Marquis House, alone in his dorm room, called his mom.

"And he said, 'Oh, I've been throwing up.' And I said, 'What is your blood sugar?'"

Chereia House says Marquis reassured her he'd checked his blood sugar and it was within the normal range.

But he was sick to his stomach, so his mother wondered if he should go to the ER.

"He was, like, 'No, mom, I'm fine. It's just a little bug, if I'm still throwing up in the morning, I will go to the hospital,'" House says.

Marquis didn't know it, but he'd developed a serious complication, known as diabetic ketoacidosis, or DKA, often triggered by an infection or missed insulin treatments.

His insulin insulin levels had dropped dangerously low.

His body, searching for fuel for energy, had begun breaking down fat, releasing acids known as ketones into his blood, which were spilling over into his urine.

In the early stages, Dr. Hutchins says, symptoms of DKA include weight loss, an increase in thirst, and frequent urination.

Kids may feel very tired and fatigued.

But as the condition worsens, she says, patients in DKA often experience vomiting, dehydration and mental confusion.

That may explain why Marquis House simply thought he just had a stomach bug.

"Usually the symptoms have been going on for weeks, very subtly and nobody has really noticed," Dr. Hutchins says. "But as far as the actual DKA, that can, within 24 hours can go from vomiting a little bit into a severe life-threatening condition."

When she hung up with Marquis, his mother asked him to call her in the morning.

"That Sunday morning, I got up and I was, like, 'Oh, he didn't call me,' says Chereia House. "So I texted him."

Marquis never responded.

Hours later, he was dead in his dorm room.

Only now, two months after his death, is his family putting together what happened in Marquis' final hours.

"He got up at some point, and was getting ready to administer his insulin," says Chereia Houe. "Or (he was trying to) check his blood. He had everything out. And then passed out."

Today, Chereia House says, it's still hard to believe the heart of their family is gone.

"But when I miss him, I come in and I just lay across his bed," his mother says. "To kind of like get his, to get his scent."

Chereia House, still consumed by questions, says she's telling their story because she wants other parents to know about DKA and other complications of diabetes.

Follow your gut, if you feel something is wrong, she says.

She wishes more than anything she's followed hers with Marquis that February night.

"I feel if I would have pushed him, and made him go to the hospital," Chereia says. "Maybe we would not be here doing this story. Every day I live with that regret, for not pushing it.`"

NEXT ARTICLE:Brain scans may help depression patients find the right treatment

Originally posted here:
19-year old Georgia college student dies of diabetes complication - FOX 5 Atlanta

Read More...

How diabetes is linked to gut bacteria – ModernMedicine

April 18th, 2017 7:47 pm

The majority of cells within our bodies are not humannor is the majority of our DNA. We are hosts to 1014 bacterial cells (50 percent to 90 percent of all cells) that make up as much as 95 percent of our total DNA.1 Most of these organisms live within the gastrointestinal (GI) tract but also within the genitourinary tract, on our skin, and on the ocular surfaceforming what is collectively known as the microbiome.

Given this abundance of nonhuman species living on and within our bodies, it is not surprising that there is a link between specific bacteria to systemic and ocular diseaseincluding diabetes and diabetes-related eye disease.

What studies tell us

A reduction in gut bacterial diversity precedes the onset of clinical diabetes.2 Reduction of intestinal species that produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), especially butyrate but also propionate and acetate, appears to be particularly important. These SCFAs improve insulin sensitivity by stimulating peroxisome-proliferator agonist gamma receptors3 (PPARG), analogous to the PPARG diabetes medication, pioglitazone (Actos, Takeda).

Butyrate enhances production of the intestinal hormone, glucagon-like peptide-14 (GLP-1), which increases insulin production, decreases glucagon secretion, and inhibits appetite. It is analogous to GLP-1 analog drugs like exenatide (Byetta, Amylin) and liraglutide (Victoza, Novo Nordisk).

Butyrate also enhances intestinal barrier function, preventing translocation of bacteria and lipopolysaccharides derived from the cell walls of Gram-negative organisms (endotoxemia) that leads to so-called leaky gut syndrome. Leaky gut syndrome has been linked to autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes and inflammatory cytokine production in type 2 diabetes (T2DM).5,6

Introduction of butyrate-producing bacteria via probiotic supplementation has been shown to improve insulin sensitivity and reduce inflammation in humans with type 2 diabetes.7

Perhaps more convincingly, transplanting fecal material from healthy adults with markedly higher numbers of butyrate-producing bacteria to obese patients with T2DM and lower numbers of such bacteria resulted in nearly 80 percent better insulin sensitivity in one small study.8

Recent meta-analysis of 11 studies with more than 600 subjects shows that multi-species probiotic supplementation modestly but significantly improves insulin resistance, excess insulin production, fasting blood sugars, and mean blood glucose (HbA1c) in humans with T2DM.9

Here is the original post:
How diabetes is linked to gut bacteria - ModernMedicine

Read More...

Researchers discover birth-and-death life cycle of neurons in the … – Science Daily

April 18th, 2017 7:45 pm

Johns Hopkins researchers have published new evidence refuting the long-held scientific belief that the gut nerve cells we're born with are the same ones we die with.

In a report published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the investigators say the finding has profound implications for the understanding and treatment of disorders and diseases that affect the digestive system.

Pankaj Jay Pasricha M.B.B.S., M.D., , professor of medicine and director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Neurogastroenterology, and Subhash Kulkarni, M.S., Ph.D., assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, led a research team that discovered the birth-and-death cycle of the neurons that form the network of millions of nerve cells throughout the digestive tract.

Previous studies have suggested that a healthy adult gut generates few or no new neurons. According to Pasricha, the Johns Hopkins study demonstrates that a healthy adult small intestine loses and regenerates about five percent of its nerve cells every day, or a third of them every week.

"Scientific dogma believed that gut neurons don't regenerate and that this 'brain,' known as the enteric nervous system, remained relatively static shortly after birth," Pasricha says. "We now have proof that, not only do they regenerate, but the whole network turns completely over every few weeks in adult animals."

The enteric nervous system controls and regulates vital gastrointestinal functions such as digestion, immunity and inflammation. After the brain, the digestive tract contains the largest nervous system in the human body.

"The yin and the yang of neuronal loss and birth keeps us going," Kulkarni says.

Pasricha, Kulkarni and their team confined their research to the small intestines of healthy adult mice. Using a variety of techniques, they found proteins associated with neural cell death and were able to observe the loss of neurons. Their work provided irrefutable evidence of ongoing neuronal death due to apoptosis in the adult gut.

This significant rate of nerve cell loss left the research team with the question of how the gut maintains its relatively constant number of neurons.

"There could be only one answer," says Kulkarni. "The high turnover of neurons in the gut could only be reconciled by birth of newborn neurons, or neurogenesis."

Despite years of research, proof of neurogenesis in the healthy digestive system has been elusive. Scientists knew that the numbers of enteric neurons in a healthy small intestine remain remarkably constant for most of the adult life. While previous studies have shown that the adult gut contains cells that can generate neurons in lab settings outside of living organisms, finding whether such cells truly give birth to neurons in healthy adult animals eluded scientists for years.

Pasricha says the key to finding the process came when the team focused on tracing and following the behavior of cells that expressed Nestin, a protein typically associated with brain stem cells.

After years of "staking out" these Nestin-expressing cells and studying their location, behavior and fate in the adult gut tissue, the research team found that some of them, called "enteric neural precursor cells," generated new neurons rapidly, shoring up and maintaining the large neuronal population that would otherwise dwindle fast in light of ongoing neuronal death.

The study also shows that any aberration that tilts the cells' birth-and-death balance may cause disease.

"Although previous studies have shown that regeneration of adult neurons may happen in an injured gut," Kulkarni says, "by and large, this appeared a relatively isolated and rare phenomenon. We now provide evidence that this happens continually and robustly in the adult healthy gut. It helps explain how this nervous system maintains itself, despite constant exposure to dietary factors, toxins, microbes and mechanical forces."

"We didn't believe it ourselves, at first," Pasricha, whose lab has been working on these neural stem cells for many years, says of the findings. "It's an extraordinary result; the mice get an entirely new 'brain' in the gut every few weeks."

He cautions that their study was limited to the mouse small intestine and that further research is necessary to determine whether other species -- including humans -- and other regions of the gut experience the same cellular birth and death processes. Such studies are underway in Pasricha's Johns Hopkins lab.

The researchers hope the findings will help identify new regenerative and other therapies for gastrointestinal motility disorders like achalasia, gastroparesis, pseudo-obstruction, colonic inertia and other problems related to the digestive system.

"And as we dig deeper into this research," says Kulkarni, "we will gain new insights into a whole host of other diseases that affect not just the gut, but other organ systems with which this nervous system communicates, such as the brain."

Read the original here:
Researchers discover birth-and-death life cycle of neurons in the ... - Science Daily

Read More...

Hopkins Researchers Discover Birth-And-Death Life Cycle of Neurons in the Adult Mouse Gut – Newswise (press release)

April 18th, 2017 7:45 pm

Newswise Johns Hopkins researchers today published new evidence refuting the long-held scientific belief that the gut nerve cells were born with are the same ones we die with.

In a report published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the investigators say the findinghas profound implications for the understanding and treatment of disorders and diseases that affect the digestive system.

Pankaj Jay Pasricha, M.B.B.S., M.D., professor of medicine and director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Neurogastroenterology, and Subhash Kulkarni, M.S., Ph.D., assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, led a research team that discovered the birth-and-death cycle of the neurons that form the network of millions of nerve cells throughout the digestive tract.

Previous studies have suggested that a healthy adult gut generates few or no new neurons. According to Pasricha, the Johns Hopkins study demonstrates that a healthy adult small intestine loses and regenerates about five percent of its nerve cells every day, or a third of them every week.

Scientific dogma believed that gut neurons dont regenerate and that this brain, known as the enteric nervous system, remained relatively static shortly after birth, Pasricha says. We now have proof that, not only do they regenerate, but the whole network turns completely over every few weeks in adult animals.

The enteric nervous system controls and regulates vital gastrointestinal functions such as digestion, immunity and inflammation. After the brain, the digestive tract contains the largest nervous system in the human body.

"The yin and the yang of neuronal loss and birth keeps us going," Kulkarni says.

Pasricha, Kulkarni and their team confined their research to the small intestines of healthy adult mice. Using a variety of techniques, they found proteins associated with neural cell death and were able to observe the loss of neurons. Their work provided irrefutable evidence of ongoing neuronal death due to apoptosis in the adult gut.

This significant rate of nerve cell loss left the research team with the question of how the gut maintains its relatively constant number of neurons.

"There could be only one answer," says Kulkarni. "The high turnover of neurons in the gut could only be reconciled by birth of newborn neurons, or neurogenesis."

Despite years of research, proof of neurogenesis in the healthy digestive system has been elusive. Scientists knew that the numbers of enteric neurons in a healthy small intestine remain remarkably constant for most of the adult life. While previous studies have shown that the adult gut contains cells that can generate neurons in lab settings outside of living organisms, finding whether such cells truly give birth to neurons in healthy adult animals eluded scientists for years.

Pasricha says the key to finding the process came when the team focused on tracing and following the behavior of cells that expressed Nestin, a protein typically associated with brain stem cells.

After years of staking out these Nestin-expressing cells and studying their location, behavior and fate in the adult gut tissue, the research team found that some of them, called enteric neural precursor cells, generated new neurons rapidly, shoring up and maintaining the large neuronal population that would otherwise dwindle fast in light of ongoing neuronal death.

The study also shows that any aberration that tilts the cells' birth-and-death balance may cause disease.

"Although previous studies have shown that regeneration of adult neurons may happen in an injured gut," Kulkarni says, "by and large, this appeared a relatively isolated and rare phenomenon. We now provide evidence that this happens continually and robustly in the adult healthy gut. It helps explain how this nervous system maintains itself, despite constant exposure to dietary factors, toxins, microbes and mechanical forces.

We didnt believe it ourselves, at first, Pasricha, whose lab has been working on these neural stem cells for many years, says of the findings. It's an extraordinary result; the mice get an entirely new brain in the gut every few weeks."

He cautions that their study was limited to the mouse small intestine and that further research is necessary to determine whether other species -- including humans -- and other regions of the gut experience the same cellular birth and death processes. Such studies are underway in Pasrichas Johns Hopkins lab.

The researchers hope the findings will help identify new regenerative and other therapies for gastrointestinal motility disorders like achalasia, gastroparesis, pseudo-obstruction, colonic inertia and other problems related to the digestive system.

"And as we dig deeper into this research," says Kulkarni, "we will gain new insights into a whole host of other diseases that affect not just the gut, but other organ systems with which this nervous system communicates, such as the brain."

Additional authors of the article are Jenna Leser, Ya-Yuan Fu, Liansheng Liu, Qian Li, Monalee Saha, Cuiping Li, Michael Anderson, Xinzhong Dong and Hongjun Song of The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Manish J. Butte of the University of California, Los Angeles; E. Michelle Southard-Smith of Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Raj P. Kapur of Seattle Children's Hospital; Maria-Adelaide Micci of the University of Texas Medical Branch; Changsik Shin and Milena Bogunovic of the Pennsylvania State University; Shiue-Cheng Tang of the National Tsing Hua University; Grigori Enikolopov of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; Laren Becker of the Stanford University School of Medicine; Nikolai Rakhilin and Xiling Shen of Duke University.

View post:
Hopkins Researchers Discover Birth-And-Death Life Cycle of Neurons in the Adult Mouse Gut - Newswise (press release)

Read More...

Researchers study secrets of aging via stem cells – Harvard Gazette

April 18th, 2017 7:45 pm

Third in an occasional series on how Harvard researchers are tackling the problematic issues of aging.

If only, wrote an ancient Japanese poet, when one heard that Old Age was coming one could bolt the door.

Science is working on it.

Aging is as much about the physical processes of repair and regeneration and their slow-motion failure as it is the passage of time. And scientists studying stem cell and regenerative biology are making progress understanding those processes, developing treatments for the many diseases whose risks increase as we get older, while at times seeming to draw close to a broader anti-aging breakthrough.

If stem cells offer potential solutions, theyre also part of the problem. Stem cells, which can differentiate into many cell types, are important parts of the bodys repair system, but lose regenerative potency as we age. In addition, their self-renewing ability allows the mutations that affect every cell to accumulate across cellular generations, and some of those mutations lead to disease.

We do think that stem cells are a key player in at least some of the manifestations of age, said Professor of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology David Scadden, co-director of the Harvard Stem Cell Institute. The hypothesis is that stem cell function deteriorates with age, driving events we know occur with aging, like our limited ability to fully repair or regenerate healthy tissue following injury.

When it comes to aging, certain tissue types seem to lead the charge, according to Professor of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology Lee Rubin, who directs the Harvard Stem Cell Institutes Therapeutic Screening Center. Particular tissues nerve cells appear to be one somehow signal to others that its time to age. This raises the prospect, Rubin said, that aging might be reversed by treating these key tissue categories, rather than designing individual treatments for the myriad tissue types that make up the body.

The process of aging involves all tissues in your body and, while different things go wrong in each tissue, they go wrong at basically the same rate, Rubin said. We can think of it as a process that is somehow coordinated, or there are fundamental processes in each tissue that play out.

In addition to key tissues, certain chemical pathways like insulin signaling seem to be able to control aging, said Rubin, whose work has received backing from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, as well as private foundations. The insulin signaling pathway is a chemical chain reaction in which the hormone insulin helps the body metabolize glucose. Reducing it has been shown to greatly extend life span in flies and worms, Rubin said. Also, signaling doesnt have to be reduced in all tissues.

If you just reduce it in neurons, the whole fly or worm lives longer, Rubin said. Certain key tissues in those organisms, if you selectively manipulate those tissues, have a positive effect on a number of processes in other tissues.

Because it circulates throughout the body, blood is an obvious place to look for controlling or signaling molecules that prompt or coordinate aging. A key carrier of oxygen and nutrients, blood is also rich with other compounds, some of which appear to play a role in decline linked to age.

Scadden described recent work done separately by Ben Ebert, a professor of medicine working at Harvard-affiliated Brigham and Womens Hospital, and Steve McCarroll, the Dorothy and Milton Flier Associate Professor of Biomedical Science and Genetics, that identified age-related changes in the blood that can increase the risk of diseases we dont typically think of as blood diseases.

Another tantalizing study, published in 2013, used the blood of a young mouse to rejuvenate the organs of an older one. In these parabiotic experiments, conducted by Professor of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology Richard Lee and Forst Family Professor of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology Amy Wagers, the circulatory systems of the two mice were joined, allowing the blood of the young to flow through the older ones body. The older mouse showed improvements in muscle tone and heart function. Later, similar experiments done by Rubin also showed improvements in neuronal health and brain functioning.

The young mouses fate depended on the age of the older mouse, Rubin said. If the latter was middle-aged, the young mouse appeared to be fine. If the older mouse was very old, however, the young mouse did worse.

Rubin said the experiments suggest that blood contains both positive and negative factors that influence aging. It may be, he said, that both are always present, but that positive factors outweigh negative in the young and that negative factors increase as we age.

Researchers have identified but not yet confirmed candidate blood factors for the rejuvenating effects. What seems not in doubt is the overall effect of the young blood on the old mouse. Interest is intense enough that a California company, Alkahest, has begun experiments giving Alzheimers patients plasma from young blood in hopes of improving cognition and brain function.

Even if that approach works, Rubin said, there would be practical hurdles to the widespread administration of young peoples blood plasma to older patients. But with an active compound identified, a drug could be made available to restore at least some cognitive function in Alzheimers patients.

In addition to the overall process of aging, researchers at the Harvard Stem Cell Institute, as well as across the University and its affiliated institutions, are investigating an array of diseases whose incidence increases sometimes dramatically with age.

The list includes several of the countrys top causes of death heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and cancer as well as rarer conditions such as the lethal neurodegenerative disorder amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Two decades ago, when stem cell research hit mainstream consciousness, many thought its greatest promise would be in stem cells ability to grow replacement parts: organs and tissues for damage caused by trauma or disease.

The stem cell revolution is still developing, Scadden said, but so far has taken a different form than many expected. The dream of harnessing stem cells to grow replacement hearts, livers, and kidneys remains, but potentially powerful uses have emerged in modeling disease for drug discovery and in targeting treatment for personalized medicine.

We thought stem cells would provide mostly replacement parts. I think thats clearly changed very dramatically. Now we think of them as contributing to our ability to make disease models for drug discovery.

David Scadden

Researchers have taken from the sick easily accessible cells, such as skin or blood, and reprogrammed them into the affected tissue type nerve cells in the case of ALS, which most commonly strikes between 55 and 75, according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

These tissues are used as models to study the disease and test interventions. Work on ALS in the lab of Professor of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology Kevin Eggan has identified a drug approved for epilepsy that might be effective against ALS. This application is now entering clinical trials, in collaboration with Harvard-affiliated Massachusetts General Hospital.

In the end, stem cells might have their greatest impact as a drug-discovery tool, Scadden said.

Much of stem cell medicine is ultimately going to be medicine, he said. Even here, we thought stem cells would provide mostly replacement parts. I think thats clearly changed very dramatically. Now we think of them as contributing to our ability to make disease models for drug discovery.

Also evolving is knowledge of stem cell biology. Our previous understanding was that once embryonic stem cells differentiated into stem cells for muscle, blood, skin, and other tissue, those stem cells remained flexible enough to further develop into an array of different cells within the tissue, whenever needed.

Recent work on blood stem cells, however, indicates that this plasticity within a particular tissue type may be more limited than previously thought, Scadden said. Instead of armies of similarly plastic stem cells, it appears there is diversity within populations, with different stem cells having different capabilities.

If thats the case, Scadden said, problems might arise in part from the loss of some of these stem cell subpopulations, a scenario that could explain individual variation in aging. Getting old may be something like the endgame in chess, he said, when players are down to just a few pieces that dictate their ability to defend and attack.

If were graced and happen to have a queen and couple of bishops, were doing OK, said Scadden, whose work is largely funded through the NIH. But if we are left with pawns, we may lose resilience as we age.

Scaddens lab is using fluorescent tags to mark stem cells in different laboratory animals and then following them to see which ones do what work. It might be possible to boost populations of particularly potent players the queens to fight disease.

Were just at the beginning of this, Scadden said. I think that our sense of stem cells as this highly adaptable cell type may or may not be true. What we observe when we look at a population may not be the case with individuals.

The replacement parts scenario for stem cells hasnt gone away. One example is in the work of Harvard Stem Cell Institute co-director and Xander University Professor Douglas Melton, who has made significant progress growing replacement insulin-producing beta cells for treatment of diabetes.

Another is in Lees research. With support from the NIH, Lee is working to make heart muscle cells that can be used to repair damaged hearts.

Trials in this area have already begun, though with cells not genetically matched to the patient. In France, researchers are placing partially differentiated embryonic stem cells on the outside of the heart as a temporary aid to healing. Another trial, planned by researchers in Seattle, would inject fully differentiated heart muscle cells into a patient after a heart attack as a kind of very localized heart transplant.

Lees approach will take longer to develop. He wants to exploit the potential of stem cell biology to grow cells that are genetically matched to the patient. Researchers would reprogram cells taken from the patient into heart cells and, as in the Seattle experiment, inject them into damaged parts of the heart. The advantage of Lees approach is that because the cells would be genetically identical to the patient, he or she could avoid antirejection drugs for life.

What were thinking about is longer-term but more ambitious, Lee said. Avoiding immune suppression could change the way we think about things, because it opens the door to many decades of potential benefit.

Change has been a constant in Lees career, and he says theres no reason to think that will slow. Patient populations are older and more complex, disease profiles are changing, and the tools physicians have at their disposal are more powerful and more targeted.

Many of our patients today wouldnt be alive if not for the benefit of research advances, he said. Cardiology has completely changed in the last 25 years. If you think its not going to change even more in the next 25 years, youre probably wrong.

When Lee envisions the full potential of stem cell science, he sees treatments and replacement organs with the power to transform how we develop and grow old.

It may not be there for you and me, but for our children or their children, ultimately, regenerative biology and stem cell biology have that kind of potential, he said. We imagine a world where it doesnt matter what mutations or other things youre born with, because we can give you a good life.

Lees not guessing at future longevity. Hes not even sure extending life span beyond the current record, 122, is possible. Instead, he cites surveys that suggest that most Americans target 90 as their expectation for a long, healthy life.

Thats about a decade more than we get now in America, Lee said. We have work to do.

Originally posted here:
Researchers study secrets of aging via stem cells - Harvard Gazette

Read More...

Reports of the Death of the C1-C2 Facet Injection have Been Greatly Exaggerated – OrthoSpineNews

April 18th, 2017 7:45 pm

Share this story with your network

By Chris Centeno, M.D., CEO at Regenexx April 16, 2017

In 1897, Mark Twain was on a speaking tour in London when an American newspaper started a rumor that he was gravely ill. This was soon followed by an obituary. When asked by an American reporter in London about his death, Twain quipped, The reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated. I feel thesame about C1-C2 facet injections. The radiofrequency mob has been trying hard to kill off cervical facet injections for years and C1-C2 is low hanging fruit, but like Twain, I have to report the death of this procedure has been greatly exaggerated.

Sometime around the turn of this last century, we began to see the use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for neck pain due to damaged facet joints take off. What is RFA and what is a damaged facet joint?

You have 14 joints in the back part of your spine (7 on each side). These joints help to control neck motion. These little articulations about the size of a finger joint are commonly called facet joints. They can become injuredor can get arthritis like any other joint in your body. When this happens they can become chronically painful.

While the injection of anti-inflammatory steroid into these joints was the most common way to treat this pain, about 2000 or so we began to see the rise of another form of treatment called RFA. This procedure uses a probe that heats up to burn away nerves around the painful joint. The idea is that once these pain carrying wires are cut, the pain will stop because its no longer being transmitted to the brain. This works pretty well and has been well researched to help chronic neck pain caused by a damagedfacetjoint. However, as you mightimagine, you cant just burn nerves that carry pain signals and not have consequences. This procedure can cause the joint to become more damaged (a Charcot joint) and in my experience can cause a cycle where the patient needs to be treated every 5-18 months forever. In addition, my personal observation is that these patients get more brittle with time. By that, I mean that when their pain returns its worse and easier to provoke than before RFA was begun.

Radiofrequency is a great medical business. Not only do these patients need to come back every so often for a repeat treatment, but insurance companies pay more for RFA than a simple facet injection. In addition, theres a third party vendorwho gets to charge outrageous prices for disposable needles and new RF probes, which means that theres lots of moolaharound to sponsor conferences, pay physician thought leaders, and medical directors. Hence, knowing that money talks in medicine, its not hard to figure out why those thought leaders have been trying to get rid of facet injections (i.e. injecting a substance into the joint rather than burning the nerves around the joint). as the idea competes with RFA. However, with the advent of orthobiologics like PRP and stem cells, everything changes.

READ THE REST HERE

Josh Sandberg has been an executive search consultant focused exclusively on orthopedic and spine start-ups since 2004. He has had a tremendous impact in helping his clients avoid costly hiring mistakes by his deep industry knowledge and network. In 2010, Josh co-founded Ortho Spine Companies, which is the parent company of Ortho Spine Distributors (OSD), Surg.io and Ortho Sales Partners (OSP). OSD a searchable database that helps ease the frustration of finding orthopedic distributors throughout the country. Surg.io is the ultimate distributor toolkit that offers distributors the tools necessary to build the foundation of a scalable and highly functioning sales organization. OSP is an end-to-end solution that helps companies approach the Global Market in a cost efficient way. Our team has hundreds of years of experience and can help you navigate the many challenges present in bringing new technologies to the market.

Originally posted here:
Reports of the Death of the C1-C2 Facet Injection have Been Greatly Exaggerated - OrthoSpineNews

Read More...

Scientists find evidence that ALS and SMA could be treated with a common drug – Medical Xpress

April 18th, 2017 7:45 pm

April 17, 2017 by Hannah L. Robbins SMN protein (red) is necessary for the survival of spinal cord neurons (motor neurons) responsible for breathing and all movement. Harvard researchers have found a compound that stabilized this protein in mouse and human motor neurons. This may lead to the development of new treatments for motor neuron diseases including Spinal Muscular Atrophy and Lou Gehrigs disease. Credit: Natalia Rodriguez-Muela

Harvard Stem Cell Institute (HSCI) researchers have identified a compound that helps protect the cells destroyed by spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), the most frequent fatal genetic disease in children under 2 years of age.

SMA is a neurodegenerative disease targeting motor neurons, the long nerve cells that relay messages from the brain to the muscles and that are, consequently, responsible for bodily movements, including walking, swallowing, and even breathing. Patients with milder forms of SMA experience muscle wasting that may confine them to a wheelchair, while the more severe forms cause paralysis and death before the second birthday.

About one in 50 people are genetic carriers of the disease.

Because of a dysfunctional gene, many motor neurons in SMA patients are unable to produce adequate amounts of a protein called survival of motor neuron (SMN). The deficiency causes cellular stress and eventually cell death. Rather than fixing the gene, which has been the strategy of many labs looking to develop SMA therapies, the Harvard team has identified a compound that helps stabilize the SMN protein both in human neurons in a dish and in mouse models.

The findings were published in the journal Cell Reports.

"This discovery opens up new lines of drug interrogation," said Lee Rubin, HSCI principal faculty member and the senior author on the study. Rubin's lab, which operates out of in Harvard's Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, uses induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) to make human models of neurological diseases.

In 2015, Rubin made a variety of neuronal types from the iPS cells of SMA patients in order to determine why motor neurons in particular were targeted, and found they experienced a fatal stress response similar to motor neurons affected by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the late-onset neurodegenerative disease more commonly known as Lou Gehrig's disease.

Additionally, some SMA-affected motor neurons were dying before others, though all of the neurons had the same genetic mutations and were experiencing the same stressful environment.

"Clearly, some motor neurons were surviving, so the next question was whether this is random or if there is a molecular explanation," Rubin said.

Early on in their most recent study, the researchers found that within a single petri dish of motor neurons derived from an SMA patient, some produced up to four times as much SMN protein as their neighbors. Over time, those motor neurons with higher levels of SMN were more likely to survive after exposure to toxic environments and stressors.

When the team analyzed motor neurons derived from ALS patients, they found similar results: Motor neurons with higher levels of SMN were likelier to survive than those with lower levels.

"The surprise was when we looked in a control culture and also saw differences between the individual neurons," Rubin said.

"It is clear that the SMN protein is necessary for all motor neuron survival, not just motor neurons targeted by ALS or SMA," said Natalia Rodrguez-Muela, a postdoctoral fellow in Rubin's lab and co-first author on the paper. The results suggest that if the team could increase the amount of SMN protein in any single motor neuron, they would be able to rescue the cell.

During a cell's life span, proteins are constantly being made and degraded, made and degraded again. To interrupt the process of breaking down the SMN protein, the researchers looked at a family of proteins called Cullins, which act as a part of the cell machinery that regulates protein degradation.

In 2011, the Rubin lab had determined that an enzyme called GSK3b helps control SMN stability. Nearly all proteins degraded by GSK3b are flagged for degradation by a pathway that involves a specific member of the Cullin family. Rubin said the researchers hypothesized that if they could block that Cullin-mediated process, the SMN proteins would not be flagged for degradation and would remain stable longer.

The researchers, led by co-first author Nadia Litterman, then dosed human and murine motor neurons with a compound known to block the specific Cullin and found that exposure to the compound made SMN proteins more stable and more abundant. As a consequence, the compound promoted survival of all motor neurons, both in human cells in the dish and in mouse models.

Additionally, mice with SMA, even the more severe forms of the disease, had some of their symptoms improve after exposure to the compound.

"This process points to an unexplored therapeutic direction that could benefit patients of not one, but two separate diseases," Rubin said.

Explore further: Hope against disease targeting children

More information: Natalia Rodriguez-Muela et al. Single-Cell Analysis of SMN Reveals Its Broader Role in Neuromuscular Disease, Cell Reports (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.035

Journal reference: Cell Reports

Provided by: Harvard University

This story is published courtesy of the Harvard Gazette, Harvard University's official newspaper. For additional university news, visit Harvard.edu.

Harvard Stem Cell Institute (HSCI) researchers studying spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) have found what they term "surprising similarities" between this childhood disorder that attacks motor neurons and amyotrophic lateral ...

Using a new stem-cell based drug screening technology with the potential to reinvent and greatly reduce the cost of the way new pharmaceuticals are developed, Harvard Stem Cell Institute (HSCI) researchers have found a compound ...

Although only 10 percent of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) cases are hereditary, a significant number of them are caused by mutations that affect proteins that bind RNA, a type of genetic material. University of California ...

A puzzling question has lurked behind SMA (spinal muscular atrophy), the leading genetic cause of death in infants.

New research from the Advanced Gene and Cell Therapy Lab at Royal Holloway, University of London has used pioneering stem cell techniques to better understand why certain cells are more at risk of degenerating in spinal muscular ...

Cedars-Sinai scientists are seeking to build an improved stem-cell model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) to accelerate progress toward a cure for the devastating neurological disorder. Their findings demonstrate that ...

Accelerated healing isn't just for superheroes. A new study in Cell Reports suggests a way that mere mortals can potentially speed their recovery from a wide variety of injuries.

Like drag car racers revving their engines at the starting line, stem cells respond more quickly to injury when they've been previously primed with one dose of a single protein, according to a study from the Stanford University ...

A team of scientists from the National Institutes of Health has discovered biological mechanisms that appear to prevent damage to the heart muscle's "power grid," the network of mitochondrial circuits that provide energy ...

Researchers have found a new group of cells in the retina that directly affect the biological clock by sending signals to a region of the brain which regulates our daily (circadian) rhythms. This new understanding of how ...

A new study from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai provides important insights into how the body regulates its production of heat, a process known as thermogenesis that is currently intensely studied as a target ...

Cornell University researchers have produced for the first time an image of P2X7, a receptor associated with chronic pain. Visualizing the shape of the receptor has also allowed them to make a second groundbreaking discovery: ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Read the rest here:
Scientists find evidence that ALS and SMA could be treated with a common drug - Medical Xpress

Read More...

Look again: How to fight data blindness – Campaign US

April 18th, 2017 7:45 pm

In the book "Blind Spot: Illuminating the Hidden Value in Business," authors Nathan Shedroff and Stephen Diller tell a story that perfectly dramatizes the problem with todays over-reliance on quantitative data.

Years ago, a team at Levis was researching customer segments and became puzzled over something: While the brand is upscale, many of its customers are not. To find out what was going on, the team took a road trip in Texas and visited people in their homes. One of them was a single mother with two kids, Francine, who was clearly struggling. Yet every year, she bought Levis for her family.

The obvious assumption would be that she was vain and irresponsible. But when they met her, they learned she worked two jobs and was obsessed with her childrens future. Asked why she chose to spend precious dollars on Levis, she replied that she didnt want her children to think they were poor and couldnt achieve more in life.

This story serves as a wake-up call to anyone who thinks that data alone is a sufficient tool to understand human behavior. Not every person fits into a neat category.

Qualitative methodologies can tell you the what (that lower income people buy Levis), but they often fail to tell you why (because theyre aspirational). They cant tell you what motivates the large part of Pradas customer base, which is not affluent. Or why many high-income people shop at big-box discount stores. Is it convenience, or because they dont like overpaying? Only qualitative research will tell.

For decades, however, qualitative research has had a bad rap. It has largely meant focus groups, which can be a costly hassle. You have to recruit respondents, conduct interviews, and travel to different citiesall of which seem time-consuming and antiquated compared to statistical analysis of a rich data set. Product strategists and executives crave insight, but they dont extend that desire to home visits, shop-alongs, and other person-on-the-street work. As a result, in the last 10 years qualitative research facilities have been closing, and quick-turn panels and mobile phone surveys have taken the place of traditional, on-the-ground methods.

But if we want to reach customers in an authentic way, we have to understand the true psychological motivation behind their behaviors. And luckily, we have some new and sophisticated ways to do just that:

Watch what people do, not just what they say. Behavioral economics has opened a new field for understanding human motivation. For example, many behavioral economists stress that quick and effortless, "System 1" thinking dominates the choices we make. The majority of people,most of the time, operate on autopilot. As a result, observing how they actually shop for things can provide deep inspiration for new services that improve store performance. For example, Newsworks award-winning "How People Buy" study literally looked through the eyeglasses of people shopping. It revealed, oddly enough, that many customers do research, not to find the best product, but to ensure that they wont regret buying their preferred brand!

Co-create, dont just evaluate. Research projects typically seek to evaluate concepts and pick a winner. A better idea is to bring people in early, and use their responses to influence design thinking. For example, innovative research firm System 1 Group seeks to improve ideas by putting emotional responses at the heart of their testing methods. This allows their customers (or potential customers) to help build on product concepts, not just evaluate them.

Get outside to understand your category. Person-on-the-street interviews have come a long way in sophistication. Today, production companies such as Snippies offer networks of professional videographers who can generate fast global feedback. Such surveys can give you insight into how people feel about products and brands, helping you move beyond the limitations of traditional tracking surveys and social listening data.

Of course, we know that data big and small isnt going anywhere. With more sources of it and better analytic methodologies, business leaders are finding it easier and easier to extract value from data. But that is only part of the storyand not always the most important part.

Compelling insights and competitive advantage still come from getting out into the world to observe, converse and create with people. While positive results may not be as assured, the insights we can learn are essentialif we want to find out what really matters to our customers.

Brandon Geary is global chief strategy officer of Possible.

See the rest here:
Look again: How to fight data blindness - Campaign US

Read More...

No more PC blindness and appeasement: Trump is the wartime president we needed – Conservative Review

April 18th, 2017 7:45 pm

Under Barack Obama, not only did the world become a more dangerous place, but his lack of will to defeat ISIS, the baloney fed to us by his failed secretaries of state, and his willingness to accept an apparently yet unreached number of American deaths due to the activity of those barbarians actually caused the demise of his partys effectiveness nationwide. Obama was on the wrong side of history.

Many Americans, like my husband and I, finally decided to vote for Donald Trump when the shooting in Orlando happened. Our preferred candidate, Ted Cruz, R-Texas, had pulled out of the race. Seeing a very nasty side of Trump, we were unconvinced he would have a level head and be able to lead the nation. So for about a month, I was sure I could not vote for Trump, nor could I vote for Clinton.

But Orlando did happen, and we agreed with Ted Cruz who believed our nation was already at war with the sickness of ISIS. My husband and I could only see more terror happening in our own country with Clinton. For all of his flaws in the understanding of basic constitutionalism, separation of powers, the proper role of government in the economy, and his tendency to relish in big government, we could see the difference between Trump and Clinton in that respect. He was gonna bomb the shit out of ISIS.

And so he has started. Thank you, President Trump.

Did Obama know that cave formation in Afghanistan Trump recently bombed was being used by ISIS as a hideout? I dont know the answer, but I think rational people could see that it is more than likely that he did. How long was ISIS using that area? What kind of attacks were carried out while that area was used by ISIS? Did the people in the tunnels cheer when Americans were killed in the numerous attacks by their soldiers of ISIS here in America? Why didnt Obama take them out?

When President Trump bombed the Syrian airfield, so many were skeptical. From where I sit, the Russian propaganda machine here in America has been gaining steam for years, as Putin used imbecilic mouthpieces here to fill the void of American leadership. Many pro-Putin Americans continuously praised him as a Western reformer, a real Christian, and just the type of strongman our nation needed. Many of them saw the strength of Trump and figured Putin and Trump would be able to team up to kill ISIS together. But the bombing in Syria and the ridiculous propaganda from Assad and Putin since should crystallize whose side Putin is really on. For those who refuse to admit they have been duped by a superior propaganda campaign from the former KGB agent, well, I guess youre on your own.

Now that the bombings have started, and we are answering a war that was declared on us, regular folks are concerned that President Trump has started WWIII. But it is not possible for President Trump to start a war we are already in. The jihadis received appeasement and Americas other cheek, arm, leg, and throat year after year under Obama. Those attacks on America mentioned in the beginning of this article could have been prevented, had we had a leader who took ISIS seriously, who followed through on ridding Syria of chemical weapons, who didnt blame the Syrian war on the silliness of global warming, and who didnt take every chance he could get to downplay the dangers of radical Islam. Who, instead of acknowledging the violence brought on by fundamentalist radical Islamists, took time rather, to repeat that America cant be at war with a religion, insinuating that it was Americans who didnt understand the threats, when it was him all along.

At the same time, it seems pretty clear Americans dont want to be seriously involved in nation-building. We dont have a reason nor ability to try to make countries that dont understand how civil societies operate into countries that do.

Let the history books show that it was the continued blindness of and appeasement toward radical Islam that caused so many innocent deaths around the world of late. Let history record that America didnt fall asleep after 9/11, but that she was hobbled for eight long years while her enemies grew stronger.

We needed a wartime president, and we got one. Now we need resolve.

Jen Kuznicki is a contributor to Conservative Review, blue collar, wife, mom, political writer, humorist, conservative activist, a seamstress by trade, and compelled to write. Follow her on Twitter @JenKuznicki.

See original here:
No more PC blindness and appeasement: Trump is the wartime president we needed - Conservative Review

Read More...

Overlooking blindness – K24 TV

April 18th, 2017 7:44 pm

Photo: Ochieng during his graduation.

Samuel Ochieng, 37, lost his sight as an infant. However, he has lived his life to the fullest, winning an award while at it

Samuel Ochieng Odawo is the perfect embodiment of the maxim that lack of sight is not lack of vision. He swam against the tide at a time his parents could hardly educate him and his siblings. Now, he is the only child from in home to set foot in a university lecture hall. His mission, to empower persons with disabilities.

He has been vocal in the formulation of disability streaming policies and advocated for the rights of refugees at Daadab. It is what keeps him going; the hope that one day, the blind will lead more useful lives. Things like crossing roads, reading and using technology will be friendlier.

Well, six months after Samuel was born, he developed measles. My late mother told me when I was nine months, my eyes became completely swollen and the doctors said I had lost my sight completely, he narrates. Samuel, the ninenth in a family of 10 says by the time his dad came back from Nakuru, where he worked, it was too late to save his sight.

Challenges

I was bred in Siaya County, Alego and I grew up blind. I didnt know I was blind, I thought that was how life is, until I overheard my mother chatting with her friends about taking me to a special school. However, it did not bother me as much since I was used to my life and didnt know how it is to see, recalls the 37-year-old. He then went on to St Order Primary School for the blind at the age of seven, performed well and later joined Thika School for The Blind. My condition helped me a great deal. My siblings education was cut short whenever they got to class seven, but I had to be kept in school and I excelled, he says.

Also read: My married baby daddy accuses me of trapping him

Despite the lack of fees, hustle to get fare, upkeep and attending school a month to closing day, he passed. After high school in 2000, he was admitted to Kenyatta University in 2002 to pursue a bachelors degree in Special Education and French. I had to find a way to pay my fee. My parents could not raise it at all and so, I looked for well-wishers and donors and that is how I sailed the four years. Being blind in campus was tough, an emotional Samuel says.

He had to sweet talk people into reading for him so that he could catch up with school work. Never in the four years did I present my fee structure to my parents, their position could not even help raise the amount he says.

Breakthrough

With a huge fee arrears after the four years, he failed to graduate and moved to Nakuru. While there, I taught French at a primary and a secondary school. It was tough because most people who see blind people assume they are out to beg. I outgrew Nakuru and decided to relocate to Mombasa in 2007, he says.

Also read: Dennis Mukundi is only at the beginning of his career

While at Nakuru, he was robbed of all of his belongings. The fact that the school needed him to teach more subjects only fanned his desire to relocate. I remember arriving in Mombasa and as I waited for my friend to come and pick me, people were giving me money. They thought I was begging and that just went to show how much people think of the blind in Kenya, says the father of one.

In 2014, he was given the Care Humanitarian Award from Care Canada for his works. The most memorable part of his work was when he was teaching at the Daadab Refugee Camp and his learners with visual impairments got their first classroom.

In 2015, he was helping a friend register for a scholarship and he too applied. I submitted my application on the last day. I was accepted and I attended Birmingham University in the United Kingdom to study a Masters in Management of Special Education in Developing Countries, he beams.

Samuel works as a consultant for special needs education and disability issues at his private firm. I am passionate about empowering persons with disability. Theres a lot of discrimination against peoples with disability in Kenya. A lot needs to be done, Samuel says.

Read more:
Overlooking blindness - K24 TV

Read More...

Genentech’s Lucentis Approved for Blindness-Causing Diabetic Retinopathy – Pharmaceutical Processing

April 18th, 2017 7:44 pm

FDA approves Genentechs Lucentis (ranibizumab injection) for diabetic retinopathy, the leading cause of blindness among working age adults in the United States.

Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Lucentis(ranibizumab injection) 0.3 mg for the monthly treatment of all forms of diabetic retinopathy. The most common cause of vision loss in people with diabetes, diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of blindness among adults aged 20 to 741and affects nearly 7.7 million people in the U.S.2

With this approval, Lucentis becomes the first and only FDA-approved medicine to treat diabetic retinopathy in people who have been diagnosed either with or without diabetic macular edema (DME), a complication of diabetic retinopathy that causes swelling in the back of the eye. In February 2015, Lucentis received FDA approval for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy in people with DME based on data from the pivotal RIDE and RISE Phase III clinical trials.

The FDA granted Lucentis Priority Review for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy without DME based on an analysis of the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Networks (DRCR.net) Protocol S study. This NIH-funded study compared Lucentis treatment to panretinal laser treatment in diabetic retinopathy patients both with and without DME.

In the analysis that supported this approval, patients with and without DME in the Lucentis group experienced improvements in the severity of their retinopathy. Adverse events were consistent with those seen in previous studies.

Diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of vision loss among working-aged adults in the U.S. between the ages of 20 and 74. We are very pleased that Lucentis is now FDA-approved to treat retinopathy in people with and without DME, said Sandra Horning, M.D., chief medical officer and head of Global Product Development. In multiple clinical studies, Lucentis demonstrated a significant improvement of patients diabetic retinopathy, and it is the first and only anti-VEGF therapy approved to treat all forms of diabetic retinopathy.

Priority Review Designation is granted to medicines that the FDA has determined to have the potential to provide significant improvements in the safety and effectiveness of the treatment of a serious disease.

The FDA previously granted Lucentis Breakthrough Therapy Designation for diabetic retinopathy in 2014 based on the pivotal RIDE and RISE phase III clinical trials. Breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of medicines with early evidence of potential clinical benefit in serious diseases and to help ensure that patients receive access to medicines as soon as possible.

Diabetes affects more than 29 million people in the U.S.3The longer a person has diabetes, especially if it is poorly controlled, the higher the risk of developing diabetic retinopathy and vision loss. Diabetic retinopathy occurs when blood vessels in the retina become damaged. This can cause vision loss or distortion when the abnormal vessels leak blood or fluid into the eye.1 ___________________________________________________

References:

1U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Common Eye Disorders: Diabetic Retinopathy. Available athttps://www.cdc.gov/visionhealth/basics/ced/index.html. Accessed March 7, 2017.

2Prevent Blindness America. Diabetic Retinopathy. Available athttp://www.visionproblemsus.org/diabetic-retinopathy/diabetic-retinopathy-definition.html. Accessed March 7, 2017.

3American Diabetes Association. Statistics About Diabetes. Available athttp://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-basics/statistics/. Accessed March 7, 2017.

(Source: Business Wire)

Read the original here:
Genentech's Lucentis Approved for Blindness-Causing Diabetic Retinopathy - Pharmaceutical Processing

Read More...

Answer for why cave animals go blind? – ScienceBlog.com (blog)

April 18th, 2017 7:44 pm

Why do animals that live in caves become blind?This question has long intrigued scientists and been the subject of hot debate.

Clearly, across the animal kingdom, blindness has evolved repeatedly. There are thousands of underground and cave-dwelling species, from naked mole rats to bats, and many have lost their

sense of sight. A well-studied blind cavefish (bottom), the Mexican tetra (Astyanax mexicanus), is a small, docile, pink-hued fish just a few centimeters long that could easily make its home in an aquarium. ASU evolutionary biologist Reed Cartwright chose this Mexican tetra because there is also a surface-dwelling form (top) that has retained its sight. Download Full Image

Charles Darwin originally suggested that eyes could be lost by disuse over time. ButReed Cartwright, an ASU evolutionary biologist in the School of Life Sciences and researcher at the Biodesign Institute,may be proving Darwin wrongin a recent publication in the journal BMC Evolutionary Biology.

We think that blindness in cavefish is indeed Darwinian, but ultimately this disproves Darwins original hypothesis of disuse, Cartwright said. In new research, he explains that eyes are not lost by disuse, but rather a demonstration of Darwins fundamental theory of natural selection at work with blindness selected as favorable and the fittest for living in a cave.

For their work, his research team choose to model a well-studied blind cavefish, the Mexican tetra (Astyanax mexicanus), a small, docile, pink-hued fish just a few centimeters long that could easily make its home in an aquarium.

Its inhabited caves for 2 million to 3 million years, giving it 5 million generations worth of time to evolve blindness. Cartwrights group chose this Mexican tetra because there is also a surface-dwelling form that has retained its sight. And for scientists, this built-in comparative power makes it a good choice for further exploration. They have two populations to study that can interbreed and are polar opposites for physical traits.

So Cartwrights group decided to use computational power to investigate how multiple evolutionary mechanisms interact to shape the fish that live in caves.

The problem we have in these caves is that they are connected to the surface, and fish that can see immigrate into the cave and bring genes for sight with them, Cartwright said. Under these conditions, we dont typically expect to find such a difference in traits between surface and cave populations. Unless selection was really, really strong.

How strong? In their model, the selection for blindness would need to be about 48 times strongerthan the immigration rate for Mexican tetras to evolve blindness in caves. Cartwrights groupestimates that a measure of fitness for blindness, called the selection coefficient, in the tetra is between 0.5 percent and 50 percent.

These coefficients are high enough that laboratory experiments should have detected a difference between surface and cave forms of the fish; however, none have to date.

Cartwrights team turned to a hypothesis going all the way back to a letter to the editor of Nature in 1925 by E. Ray Lankester, that essentially stated that the reason you have blindness in caves is because the fish that can see simply leave.

If sighted fish swim towards the light, the only fish that stay in the cave are blind fish. They arent trying to get to the light anymore because they cant see it. Which actually is a form of selection, and thus, Darwinian evolution in action, Cartwright said.

According to Cartwright, explaining a fitness difference as big as 10 percent between sighted and blind fish may be difficult, Iosing eyes might not give you 10 percent more offspring. However, if 10 percent of your seeing-eye fish leave the cave, the migration rate is reasonably low, and that could be enough.

If over time, enough of the seeing-eye fish are systematically being removed, they will also be removed from the gene pool, and that could be enough to drive the evolutionary process.

It could be this sort of habitat preference that maintains the local blind fish population, and the fish that can see are preferentially moving out of the cave. We found that even a low level of preferential emigration, e.g. 2 percent, would provide a significant boost to local adaptation and the evolution of blindness in caves.

Cartwrights team hopes that field biologists begin to consider Lankesters 90-year old hypothesis when studying cavefish. It would be great if someone could develop a study to test Lankesters hypothesis and whether it is driving the evolution of blindness in caves. That would really help answer one of the questions that have intrigued biologists for over a century.

Cartwrights research was supported by National Science Foundation Advances in Bioinformatics program and Arizona State Universitys School of Life Sciences and Barrett, The Honors College.

See the original post:
Answer for why cave animals go blind? - ScienceBlog.com (blog)

Read More...

Why Silicon Valley Keeps Getting Biotechnology Wrong – New York Magazine

April 18th, 2017 7:44 pm

Photo: Jamie McCarthy/Getty Images for Glamour

Two years after the $9 billion start-up unicorn Theranos crumbled, Silicon Valley still appears to be struggling to learn its lesson when it comes to health and medical start-ups. Improbable-sounding companies continue to turn up with tens of millions of dollars in funding, no published research to back them up, and nothing but criticism from scientists. Last week, BuzzFeed News examined a new set of start-ups promising to detect cancer early via a simple blood test Freenome, Grail, and Guardant and found them on paths dangerously similar to the one Theranos was on just a few years ago. A year ago, Freenome promised to publish about its product in a scientific journal very soon to Fast Company, and still hasnt. Cancer researchers told BuzzFeed very plainly that such a simple test would be miraculous but seemed improbably advanced beyond our current technology, which was also the case with Theranoss miniature blood tests and Freenome made its lofty promises only months after Theranos started to fall apart. Like a Kickstarter project well over its anticipated delivery date, one begins to wonder if it was all fake.

Silicon Valley has a kind of blind spot when it comes to biotechnology, health-related start-ups, and other medical pursuits. The Theranos hype train was only stopped when The Wall Street Journal surfaced evidence that Theranos had misrepresented how far along it was in its research process to its investors, passing off mediocre test results as much more conclusive than they were. Venture-capital firms insist that the standard that needs to be met for investment is much higher for medical start-ups, which must prove that their technology works with data, not just a pitch. And yet somehow, when these start-ups finally surface to public consciousness, they dont appear to pass even the most basic smell test with literally any experienced researcher in the field.

There are some confounding factors to take into account: venture capitalists invest in ambitious businesses and expect a high failure rate; health start-up failures are highly visible in part because biotechnology businesses are more unusual, and because they tend to be involved with actual life-or-death human experiences. No one really cares about another Uber-alike (just as no one really cared about Uber until it had established itself) but almost everyone has a personal relationship with cancer, and everyone wants a solution to it as soon as possible.

But the fact that we all have bodies, and all need doctors may also be why Silicon Valley seems unable to avoid dabbling in medical technology. The intersection of future tech and health has become crowded with some of the countrys richest hobbyists. They love biohacking (theres even a subscription box). They believe, almost to a man, that the singularity is a question of not if, but when. Elon Musk is very seriously investing in arming biological humans against computers; Peter Thiel takes human growth hormone, a popular practice among transhumanists, and has expressed interested in getting blood transfusions from young people as a way of reversing aging (to his credit, there is some published scientific evidence this might actually work, however fundamentally sinister it sounds). Larry Page, Sergey Brin, Mark Zuckerberg, Sean Parker, and Martine Rothblatt have all sincerely expressed interests in similar pursuits. They often seem less concerned with protecting humanity than their own consciousnesses, designing brain-machine interfaces that will both preserve their own copious knowledge reserves and merge them with the larger internet, turning each tech CEO, investor, and founder into an army of IBM Watsons, but smarter.

There is a pervasive sense in Silicon Valley, bolstered by ten years of world-conquering success, that any sufficiently intelligent, sufficiently driven person can will what they want. The only thing slowing the unrelenting forward march of medical tech is funding. Solutions are an inevitability, and the realities of the human body are simply a set of inefficiencies that can, with enough time and attention, be brought to heel. The culture of Silicon Valley meritocracy affords its practitioners cynicism when confronted with realities other than their own: If you were dumb enough to trust new tech, or too poor to have more options, you deserve what you had coming.

Health tech is certainly valuable and ripe for profit. Machines and medical tests used in hospitals for treatment and diagnosis are wildly expensive, but their cost is determined both by demand (high; no one wants to die, and enough people have insurance) and research (expensive, very costly to get right and get through all the hoops of being brought to market). For further evidence, look at the pharmaceutical industry. Investors who sense a rich potential for profit if only they can insert themselves at the right place in the process are not wrong, in that sense.

But the move fast and break things mantra that has helped Silicon Valley disrupt countless industries over the last two decades is more dangerous when applied to medical science. The roadblocks that health tech companies run into are not qualitatively different from the ones that all tech companies run into. But when Uber or Airbnb run afoul of their respective laws, the result is abstracted lost money out of someones pocket the government, independent contractors, independent businesses, other segments of the market. When Airbnb keeps viable apartments off the market so they can be rented short-term to its users, the money can theoretically be remanded if someone determines that Airbnb is doing something wrong. The things being broken by the current generation of unicorns are regulatory regimes. (Valuable, useful regulatory regimes, to be sure.) The things being broken by health start-ups are laws of science and ironclad guidelines for research. When a health start-up moves fast and breaks things, it can directly result in the death, dismemberment, and injury of real people. You cant un-kill someone who died thanks to a bad diagnosis (at least, theres no start-up hawking that yet).

Theres always room to be wrong in business. But theres less of that room when it comes to medical treatment. That it appears all the same to even the highest-profile venture capitalists actually turns out to make a lot of sense.

The Snapchat 101: The Best, Coolest, Smartest, Weirdest Accounts on the Hottest Social Network on Your Phone

F**k.

The News Feeds enormous audience wont solve its waning relevance.

If Snapchat wants to be the Apple of augmented reality, Facebook is more than happy to be its Microsoft.

We give it three months before Facebook rips off the idea.

Move fast and break things doesnt work when those things are research procedures, laws of science, and human bodies.

A day in the life of YouTubes reigning teen queen.

Cabana lets you watch videos with your friends in real time.

You may be able to give a five-star review, and tip a dollar or two, at the end of an Uber ride in the near future.

Cant keep a good content farm down.

F**k.

How Robert Taylor, who passed away Thursday at the age of 85, essentially created the internet as we know it.

It is kind of contagious, the optimism. I guess it just becomes a part of you.

Add a little pinch of electoral participation.

As YouTube becomes big business for families willing to film everything, are the kids adequately protected?

This is bad news for a lot of PC owners.

Some assembly required.

Everything you need to make the best slime at home.

Lemme up there to hang out with these good boys.

True art takes courage.

When product placement goes wrong.

Read more:
Why Silicon Valley Keeps Getting Biotechnology Wrong - New York Magazine

Read More...

Investor Radar: Taking a Closer Look at Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (NASDAQ:PBYI) – Davidson Register

April 18th, 2017 7:44 pm

Active investors may be taking a second look at shares of Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (NASDAQ:PBYI). Checking in on some levels, the six month price index is currently at 0.68164. The six month price index is measured by dividing the current share price by the share price six months ago. A ratio above one indicates an increase in the stock price over the six month time frame. A ratio under one signals that the price has lowered over that same time frame.

We can also take a look at some stock volatility data on shares of Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (NASDAQ:PBYI). The 12 month volatility is currently 85.067900. The 6 month volatility is noted at 83.631200, and the 3 month is recorded at 75.587900. When following the volatility of a stock, investors may be challenged with trying to decipher the correct combination of risk-reward to help maximize returns. As with any strategy, it is important to carefully consider risk and other market factors that might be in play when examining stock volatility levels.

Investors may be looking at the Piotroski F-Score when doing value analysis. The F-Score was developed to help find company stocks that have solid fundamentals, and to separate out weaker companies. Piotroskis F-Score uses nine tests based on company financial statements. Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (NASDAQ:PBYI) currently has a Piotroski F-Score of 2. One point is given for piece of criteria that is met. Typically, a stock with a high score of 8 or 9 would be seen as strong, and a stock scoring on the lower end between 0 and 2 would be viewed as weaker.

Shifting gears, Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (NASDAQ:PBYI) has an FCF quality score of -6.273255. The free quality score helps estimate the stability of free cash flow. FCF quality is calculated as the 12 ltm cash flow per share over the average of the cash flow numbers. When reviewing this score, it is generally thought that the lower the ratio, the better. Presently, Puma Biotechnology, Inc. has an FCF score of 0.359983. The FCF score is determined by merging free cash flow stability with free cash flow growth. In general, a higher FCF score value would represent high free cash flow growth. Monitoring FCF information may help provide some excellent insight on the financial health of a specific company.

Investors might want to take a look at shares of Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (NASDAQ:PBYI) from a different angle. Lets take a peek at the current Q.i. (Liquidity) Value. Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (NASDAQ:PBYI) has a Q.i. value of 84.00000. This value ranks stocks using EBITDA yield, FCF yield, earnings yield and liquidity ratios. The Q.i. value may help identify companies that are undervalued. A larger value would indicate low turnover and a higher chance of shares being priced incorrectly. A lower value may show larger traded value meaning more sell-side analysts may track the company leading to a lesser chance that shares are priced improperly.

By DR Staff Writer

See more here:
Investor Radar: Taking a Closer Look at Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (NASDAQ:PBYI) - Davidson Register

Read More...

Can Lilly Survive Rheumatoid Arthritis Flop With Breast Cancer Drug? – Investor’s Business Daily

April 18th, 2017 7:44 pm

AbbVie (ABBV) will get some breathing room in rheumatoid arthritis after Eli Lilly (LLY) and Incyte's (INCY) drug was hit with delays by the Food and Drug Administration over the weekend, leaving Lilly to instead focus on a Pfizer (PFE)-rivaling breast cancer med.

On Friday, theFDA asked for more dosing information for Lilly and Incyte's rheumatoid arthritis drug, baricitinib, causing what could be a lengthy delay in its release. So Lilly'sbreast cancer drug known as abemaciclib is now especially important for Lilly, Leerink analyst Seamus Fernandez said.

Abemaciclib could compete against Pfizer's Ibrance and Novartis' (NVS) Kisqali in the CDK4/6 inhibitor market. These drugs aim to inhibit a specific set of enzymes thought to be tied to breast cancer.

"In our Lilly model, we are currently forecasting $1.5 billion global sales of abemaciclib by 2026 with the overall CDK4/6 market reaching more than $10 billion," Fernandezwrote in a note to clients.

Fernandez said abemaciclib could be the next major catalyst for Lilly's stock. Phase 3 data on abemaciclib is expected in June.

"We believe abemaciclib's ability to dose continuously together with a safe and manageable tolerability profile likely will make abemaciclib highly competitive with Novartis' Kisqali and provide opportunities to differentiate from Pfizer's Ibrance on secondary efficacy measures like response rate," Fernandez said.

The analyst kept his outperform rating and 91 price target on Lilly stock.

Lilly shares toppled as much as 5.6% on the stock market today, closing down 4.1% to 82.38, below its 50-day ling and a 83.34 buy point. Incyte stock tumbled 10.5% to 126.07.The delay on baricitinib means it likely won't get FDA approval until 2018 and launch until 2019. That removes a near-term rival for AbbVie's Humira. It also puts Lilly/Incyte seven to eight years behind Pfizer's Xeljanz, and more in line with generic-like competition.

Analysts expect the drug to be delayed at least a year, and shares of Lilly and Incyte toppled early Monday. Baricitinib already has been approved for use in Europe.

While baricitinib is likely delayed, Fernandez expects $1.7 billion in peak U.S. sales when it is approved. And Lilly still benefits from sales in Europe where the drug has attained approval.

IBD'S TAKE:IBD's 43-company Ethical-Drugmakers industry group has risento No. 150 out of 197 groups tracked from No. 184 just four weeks ago. Head to IBD Stock Checkup for a list of the top-rated drugmakers.

Other analysts agreed on the one-year delay for baricitinib, but were more cautious on Lilly's breast cancer drug. BMO analyst Alex Arfaei called abemaciclib "the biggest remaining uncertainty for Lilly in 2017."He sees the data as likely to disappoint.

"We still have not seen much data that would indicate CDK4/6 inhibitors are meaningfully differentiated," he wrote in a report. "Data from (the American Association for Cancer Research) 2017 suggests abemaciclib is not as selective as ribociclib (Kisqali) and Ibrance."

Arfaei cut his price target on Lilly stock to 71 from 73, though he maintained his forecast for 5% sales growth for Lilly in 2017 on its diabetesdrugs Trulicity, Jardiance and Basaglar, and psoriasis drug Talz.

These drugs "should offset the decline of mature franchises," he wrote. "However, from 2015-20, we forecast revenue compound annual growth rate of 4%, below Lilly's guidance of 5% partly because more conservative assumptions for the mature franchises."

RELATED:

Eli Lilly, Incyte Stocks Break Key Levels After FDA Drug Setback

How Biogen's Takeover Prospects Soured In Mere Months

Biotechs Split: Axovant Rides CEO Swap, But Celgene Partner Dives

Eli Lilly could do better than its rivals in diabetes drug sales. (Jonathan Weiss/Shutterstock.com)

4:36 PM ET Eli Lilly is set to outperform bigger drugmakers Novartis and Sanofi in terms of first-quarter diabetes sales.

4:36 PM ET Eli Lilly is set to outperform bigger drugmakers Novartis and...

Read the original:
Can Lilly Survive Rheumatoid Arthritis Flop With Breast Cancer Drug? - Investor's Business Daily

Read More...

Page 1,051«..1020..1,0501,0511,0521,053..1,0601,070..»


2025 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick