header logo image


Page 947«..1020..946947948949..960970..»

Do Low Calorie Diets Help You Live Longer? – Healthline

August 30th, 2017 10:41 am

Cutting calories from the diets of many animals dramatically increases their life span, leading some people to try to extend their own lives in the same way.

If you could live to be 130 years old, what would you willingly give up?

How about 30 to 50 percent of the calories you eat for the rest of your life?

Proponents of the dietary practice known as calorie restriction (CR) happily make this trade-off every day in hopes of having life spans that leave todays centenarians in the dust.

This may sound like a fad diet, but theres quite a bit of research to back up the use of calorie restriction for longevity although most of it has been done in animals other than humans.

So how likely is it that eating child-size portions for every meal will gain you an extra few decades of life?

Studies have shown that calorie restriction can extend the life span and reduce age-related chronic diseases of many species, including mice, fish, worms, and yeast.

But these creatures are not people.

Which is why scientists turn to primates like rhesus monkeys, which age similarly to humans, as well as develop cancer, diabetes, and some traits of Alzheimers disease.

In a study published earlier this year in Nature Communications, researchers found that monkeys who ate a 30 percent calorie restricted diet lived longer than those on a regular diet.

Six of the 20 monkeys on a calorie restricted diet have lived beyond 40 years. The average lifespan for monkeys in captivity is around 26 years. One male is currently 43 years old, a record for the species.

Researchers also found that calorie restriction benefitted older monkeys, but not younger ones. This is in contrast to other studies in mice that showed that starting calorie restriction at a young age gives the best results.

The sex of the monkeys and what they ate not just the number of calories also affected how much monkeys benefitted from calories restriction.

While the results of animal studies are promising, scientists know less about how calorie restriction affects people, especially long-term.

Given that Americans live on average around 78 years, researchers would have to wait decades to see if calorie restriction extended human life span.

To compensate for this, Duke University researchers instead looked at measures of biological age.

In a study published earlier this year in The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, researchers divided volunteers into two groups a calorie restriction group and a regular diet group.

The calorie restriction group aimed to cut their caloric intake by 25 percent although by the end of the two-year study they had only achieved a 12 percent reduction.

After each one-year period, the biological age of people in the calorie restriction group increased by 0.11 years, compared with 0.71 years for people who stuck with their usual diets.

Researchers calculated biological age using chronological age and biomarkers for things such as cardiovascular and immune system function, total cholesterol, and hemoglobin levels.

However, researchers only followed people for two years. Whether these benefits continue after this point, and at what level, is unknown.

No one is certain why calorie restriction increases the life span of so many organisms.

Some scientists think it may have to do with free radicals atoms with an unpaired electron that are released when the body turns food into energy.

Free radicals can damage important parts of the cell, like DNA and the cells membrane. So cutting back on the food you eat may decrease the number of free radicals circulating in the body.

Insulin could also play a role. As we age, our bodies can become resistant to this hormone, leading to excess glucose in the blood that can damage organs, blood vessels, and nerves.

Some researchers, though, think calorie restriction increases longevity by rejuvenating the bodys biological clock.

This clock is actually a set of genes that change activity in order to sync with the cycle of day and night.

In a recent study published in the journal Cell, researchers found that the biological clock activated different genes in liver cells of older mice, compared with younger ones. As a result, cells in older mice processed energy inefficiently.

However, when researchers cut the calorie intake for older mice by 30 percent for six months, the energy processing in the cells resembled that of young mice.

A second research group, in another study published in Cell, saw a similar reboot of the biologic clock of stem cells in older mice fed a calorie-restricted diet.

If signing up for a lifetime of hunger to gain a few extra years of life doesnt sound appealing, you may have other options for breaking the 100-year mark or at least living healthier.

A team led by gerontologist Valter Longo, PhD, director of the University of Southern California Longevity Institute, tested the effects of a fasting-mimicking diet an alternative to only drinking water on the risk of developing major diseases.

The study was published earlier this year in Science Translational Medicine.

People on the fasting-mimicking diet ate about 750 to 1,100 calories per day, for five days per month, over three months.

Adult women usually eat 1,600 to 2,400 calories per day, and adult men generally eat 2,000 to 3,000 calories per day.

Food used in the study contained exact proportions of proteins, fats, and carbohydrates.

People on the fasting-mimicking diet saw a drop in their blood pressure, blood glucose, and markers of inflammation, compared with people eating a regular diet.

People who fasted also lost weight over the three months, but not muscle mass, which is a concern with a calorie-restricted diet.

As with other calorie restriction studies in people, this one doesnt show that cutting back on calories increases lifespan, only that it may reduce certain risk factors for disease.

The CR Society International, an organization that offers resources for people wanting to live longer by cutting out calories, lists some of the potential unwanted effects of long-term calorie restriction.

These include loss of bone mass, sensitivity to cold, and decreased sex drive.

Some experts are also concerned that calorie restriction could cross the line into an eating disorder, such as anorexia nervosa.

Dr. Ovidio Bermudez, chief clinical officer and medical director of child and adolescent services at the Eating Recovery Center, said if someone walked into his office saying that they were going to cut their caloric intake by 30 or 50 percent for the rest of their life, I would raise serious concerns about that.

You may be awakening a monster that you dont want to deal with, said Bermudez.

He emphasized, though, that not everyone who does calorie restriction will develop anorexia.

Like other eating disorders, anorexia has a strong genetic component that puts some people at risk more than others, although scientists dont fully understand the genetics.

However, genetics alone is not enough to trigger the disease.

The genetic predisposition [to eating disorders] is insufficient and needs to interact with some other influences, said Bermudez. It seems that, in this day and age, those other influences are, to a great extent, environmental.

There is no single environmental trigger for anorexia.

Some teenage girls or boys may take a health class in high school and decide to eat less and exercise more. Or a young adult may look around and try to conform with the fast-paced, thin-ideal culture that we live in, said Bermudez.

Or someone wanting to live longer may restrict their calories.

Not everyone in these situations will develop an eating disorder. But the danger is that someone who drastically cuts down on eating will cross a threshold leading to a neurobiological change that seems to both trigger and cement the illness process, said Bermudez.

People doing calorie restriction who end up with pre-anorexia or anorexia may not even realize they are in trouble.

There is a subset that will probably cross the threshold and lose perspective, said Bermudez, and those are the people who are unlikely to have a keen awareness of whats really happening with them.

Bermudez said that even though eating disorders are serious illnesses with the highest mortality rate of any mental illness there is hope, whether the trigger was extreme veganism or calorie restriction.

Treatment, though, works best with early diagnosis and effective intervention.

Since many people who do calorie restriction see a doctor regularly to make sure they arent slipping into malnutrition, these visits could also be a good time to check their mental health.

Asked whether calorie restriction makes sense in people, Bermudez pointed to the lack of long-term studies in humans.

If I owned a rat or a worm, and I wanted them to live for a long time, I would do calorie restriction for them, said Bermudez. But I wouldnt do it for my kids or my family because the data is simply lacking.

See more here:
Do Low Calorie Diets Help You Live Longer? - Healthline

Read More...

5. Hematopoietic Stem Cells | stemcells.nih.gov

August 30th, 2017 10:41 am

With more than 50 years of experience studying blood-forming stem cells called hematopoietic stem cells, scientists have developed sufficient understanding to actually use them as a therapy. Currently, no other type of stem cell, adult, fetal or embryonic, has attained such status. Hematopoietic stem cell transplants are now routinely used to treat patients with cancers and other disorders of the blood and immune systems. Recently, researchers have observed in animal studies that hematopoietic stem cells appear to be able to form other kinds of cells, such as muscle, blood vessels, and bone. If this can be applied to human cells, it may eventually be possible to use hematopoietic stem cells to replace a wider array of cells and tissues than once thought.

Despite the vast experience with hematopoietic stem cells, scientists face major roadblocks in expanding their use beyond the replacement of blood and immune cells. First, hematopoietic stem cells are unable to proliferate (replicate themselves) and differentiate (become specialized to other cell types) in vitro (in the test tube or culture dish). Second, scientists do not yet have an accurate method to distinguish stem cells from other cells recovered from the blood or bone marrow. Until scientists overcome these technical barriers, they believe it is unlikely that hematopoietic stem cells will be applied as cell replacement therapy in diseases such as diabetes, Parkinson's Disease, spinal cord injury, and many others.

Blood cells are responsible for constant maintenance and immune protection of every cell type of the body. This relentless and brutal work requires that blood cells, along with skin cells, have the greatest powers of self-renewal of any adult tissue.

The stem cells that form blood and immune cells are known as hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). They are ultimately responsible for the constant renewal of bloodthe production of billions of new blood cells each day. Physicians and basic researchers have known and capitalized on this fact for more than 50 years in treating many diseases. The first evidence and definition of blood-forming stem cells came from studies of people exposed to lethal doses of radiation in 1945.

Basic research soon followed. After duplicating radiation sickness in mice, scientists found they could rescue the mice from death with bone marrow transplants from healthy donor animals. In the early 1960s, Till and McCulloch began analyzing the bone marrow to find out which components were responsible for regenerating blood [56]. They defined what remain the two hallmarks of an HSC: it can renew itself and it can produce cells that give rise to all the different types of blood cells (see Chapter 4. The Adult Stem Cell).

A hematopoietic stem cell is a cell isolated from the blood or bone marrow that can renew itself, can differentiate to a variety of specialized cells, can mobilize out of the bone marrow into circulating blood, and can undergo programmed cell death, called apoptosisa process by which cells that are detrimental or unneeded self-destruct.

A major thrust of basic HSC research since the 1960s has been identifying and characterizing these stem cells. Because HSCs look and behave in culture like ordinary white blood cells, this has been a difficult challenge and this makes them difficult to identify by morphology (size and shape). Even today, scientists must rely on cell surface proteins, which serve, only roughly, as markers of white blood cells.

Identifying and characterizing properties of HSCs began with studies in mice, which laid the groundwork for human studies. The challenge is formidable as about 1 in every 10,000 to 15,000 bone marrow cells is thought to be a stem cell. In the blood stream the proportion falls to 1 in 100,000 blood cells. To this end, scientists began to develop tests for proving the self-renewal and the plasticity of HSCs.

The "gold standard" for proving that a cell derived from mouse bone marrow is indeed an HSC is still based on the same proof described above and used in mice many years ago. That is, the cells are injected into a mouse that has received a dose of irradiation sufficient to kill its own blood-producing cells. If the mouse recovers and all types of blood cells reappear (bearing a genetic marker from the donor animal), the transplanted cells are deemed to have included stem cells.

These studies have revealed that there appear to be two kinds of HSCs. If bone marrow cells from the transplanted mouse can, in turn, be transplanted to another lethally irradiated mouse and restore its hematopoietic system over some months, they are considered to be long-term stem cells that are capable of self-renewal. Other cells from bone marrow can immediately regenerate all the different types of blood cells, but under normal circumstances cannot renew themselves over the long term, and these are referred to as short-term progenitor or precursor cells. Progenitor or precursor cells are relatively immature cells that are precursors to a fully differentiated cell of the same tissue type. They are capable of proliferating, but they have a limited capacity to differentiate into more than one cell type as HSCs do. For example, a blood progenitor cell may only be able to make a red blood cell (see Figure 5.1. Hematopoietic and Stromal Stem Cell Differentiation ).

Figure 5.1. Hematopoietic and Stromal Stem Cell Differentiation.

( 2001 Terese Winslow, Lydia Kibiuk)

Harrison et al. write that short-term blood-progenitor cells in a mouse may restore hematopoiesis for three to four months [36]. The longevity of short-term stem cells for humans is not firmly established. A true stem cell, capable of self-renewal, must be able to renew itself for the entire lifespan of an organism. It is these long-term replicating HSCs that are most important for developing HSC-based cell therapies. Unfortunately, to date, researchers cannot distinguish the long-term from the short-term cells when they are removed from the bloodstream or bone marrow.

The central problem of the assays used to identify long-term stem cells and short-term progenitor cells is that they are difficult, expensive, and time-consuming and cannot be done in humans. A few assays are now available that test cells in culture for their ability to form primitive and long-lasting colonies of cells, but these tests are not accepted as proof that a cell is a long-term stem cell. Some genetically altered mice can receive transplanted human HSCs to test the cells' self-renewal and hematopoietic capabilities during the life of a mouse, but the relevance of this test for the cells in humanswho may live for decadesis open to question.

The difficulty of HSC assays has contributed to two mutually confounding research problems: definitively identifying the HSC and getting it to proliferate, or increase its numbers, in a culture dish. More rapid research progress on characterizing and using HSCs would be possible if they could be readily grown in the laboratory. Conversely, progress in identifying growth conditions suitable for HSCs and getting the cells to multiply would move more quickly if scientists could reliably and readily identify true HSCs.

HSCs have an identity problem. First, the ones with long-term replicating ability are rare. Second, there are multiple types of stem cells. And, third, the stem cells look like many other blood or bone marrow cells. So how do researchers find the desired cell populations? The most common approach is through markers that appear on the surface of cells. (For a more detailed discussion, see Appendix E.i. Markers: How Do Researchers Use Them to Identify Stem Cells?) These are useful, but not perfect tools for the research laboratory.

In 1988, in an effort to develop a reliable means of identifying these cells, Irving Weissman and his collaborators focused attention on a set of protein markers on the surface of mouse blood cells that were associated with increased likelihood that the cell was a long-term HSC [50]. Four years later, the laboratory proposed a comparable set of markers for the human stem cell [3]. Weissman proposes the markers shown in Table 5.1 as the closest markers for mouse and human HSCs [62].

* Only one of a family of CD59 markers has thus far been evaluated.** Lin- cells lack 13 to 14 different mature blood-lineage markers.

Such cell markers can be tagged with monoclonal antibodies bearing a fluorescent label and culled out of bone marrow with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

The groups of cells thus sorted by surface markers are heterogeneous and include some cells that are true, long-term self-renewing stem cells, some shorter-term progenitors, and some non-stem cells. Weissman's group showed that as few as five genetically tagged cells, injected along with larger doses of stem cells into lethally irradiated mice, could establish themselves and produce marked donor cells in all blood cell lineages for the lifetime of the mouse. A single tagged cell could produce all lineages for as many as seven weeks, and 30 purified cells were sufficient to rescue mice and fully repopulate the bone marrow without extra doses of backup cells to rescue the mice [49]. Despite these efforts, researchers remain divided on the most consistently expressed set of HSC markers [27, 32]. Connie Eaves of the University of British Columbia says none of the markers are tied to unique stem cell functions or truly define the stem cell [14]. "Almost every marker I am aware of has been shown to be fickle," she says.

More recently, Diane Krause and her colleagues at Yale University, New York University, and Johns Hopkins University, used a new technique to home in on a single cell capable of reconstituting all blood cell lineages of an irradiated mouse [27]. After marking bone marrow cells from donor male mice with a nontoxic dye, they injected the cells into female recipient mice that had been given a lethal dose of radiation. Over the next two days, some of the injected cells migrated, or homed, to the bone marrow of the recipients and did not divide; when transplanted into a second set of irradiated female mice, they eventually proved to be a concentrated pool of self-renewing stem cells. The cells also reconstituted blood production. The scientists estimate that their technique concentrated the long-term stem cells 500 to 1,000- fold compared with bone marrow.

The classic source of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is bone marrow. For more than 40 years, doctors performed bone marrow transplants by anesthetizing the stem cell donor, puncturing a bonetypically a hipboneand drawing out the bone marrow cells with a syringe. About 1 in every 100,000 cells in the marrow is a long-term, blood-forming stem cell; other cells present include stromal cells, stromal stem cells, blood progenitor cells, and mature and maturing white and red blood cells.

As a source of HSCs for medical treatments, bone marrow retrieval directly from bone is quickly fading into history. For clinical transplantation of human HSCs, doctors now prefer to harvest donor cells from peripheral, circulating blood. It has been known for decades that a small number of stem and progenitor cells circulate in the bloodstream, but in the past 10 years, researchers have found that they can coax the cells to migrate from marrow to blood in greater numbers by injecting the donor with a cytokine, such as granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF). The donor is injected with GCSF a few days before the cell harvest. To collect the cells, doctors insert an intravenous tube into the donor's vein and pass his blood through a filtering system that pulls out CD34+ white blood cells and returns the red blood cells to the donor. Of the cells collected, just 5 to 20 percent will be true HSCs. Thus, when medical researchers commonly refer to peripherally harvested "stem cells," this is something of a misnomer. As is true for bone marrow, the CD34+ cells are a mixture of stem cells, progenitors, and white blood cells of various degrees of maturity.

In the past three years, the majority of autologous (where the donor and recipient are the same person) and allogeneic (where the donor and recipient are different individuals) "bone marrow" transplants have actually been white blood cells drawn from peripheral circulation, not bone marrow. Richard Childs, an intramural investigator at the NIH, says peripheral harvest of cells is easier on the donorwith minimal pain, no anesthesia, and no hospital staybut also yields better cells for transplants [6]. Childs points to evidence that patients receiving peripherally harvested cells have higher survival rates than bone marrow recipients do. The peripherally harvested cells contain twice as many HSCs as stem cells taken from bone marrow and engraft more quickly. This means patients may recover white blood cells, platelets, and their immune and clotting protection several days faster than they would with a bone marrow graft. Scientists at Stanford report that highly purified, mobilized peripheral cells that have CD34+ and Thy-1+ surface markers engraft swiftly and without complication in breast cancer patients receiving an autologous transplant of the cells after intensive chemotherapy [41].

In the late 1980s and early 1990s, physicians began to recognize that blood from the human umbilical cord and placenta was a rich source of HSCs. This tissue supports the developing fetus during pregnancy, is delivered along with the baby, and, is usually discarded. Since the first successful umbilical cord blood transplants in children with Fanconi anemia, the collection and therapeutic use of these cells has grown quickly. The New York Blood Center's Placental Blood Program, supported by NIH, is the largest U.S. public umbilical cord blood bank and now has 13,000 donations available for transplantation into small patients who need HSCs. Since it began collecting umbilical cord blood in 1992, the center has provided thousands of cord blood units to patients. Umbilical cord blood recipientstypically childrenhave now lived in excess of eight years, relying on the HSCs from an umbilical cord blood transplant [31, 57].

There is a substantial amount of research being conducted on umbilical cord blood to search for ways to expand the number of HSCs and compare and contrast the biological properties of cord blood with adult bone marrow stem cells. There have been suggestions that umbilical cord blood contains stem cells that have the capability of developing cells of multiple germ layers (multipotent) or even all germ layers, e.g., endoderm, ectoderm, and mesoderm (pluripotent). To date, there is no published scientific evidence to support this claim. While umbilical cord blood represents a valuable resource for HSCs, research data have not conclusively shown qualitative differences in the differentiated cells produced between this source of HSCs and peripheral blood and bone marrow.

An important source of HSCs in research, but not in clinical use, is the developing blood-producing tissues of fetal animals. Hematopoietic cells appear early in the development of all vertebrates. Most extensively studied in the mouse, HSC production sweeps through the developing embryo and fetus in waves. Beginning at about day 7 in the life of the mouse embryo, the earliest hematopoietic activity is indicated by the appearance of blood islands in the yolk sac (see Appendix A. Early Development). The point is disputed, but some scientists contend that yolk sac blood production is transient and will generate some blood cells for the embryo, but probably not the bulk of the HSCs for the adult animal [12, 26, 44]. According to this proposed scenario, most stem cells that will be found in the adult bone marrow and circulation are derived from cells that appear slightly later and in a different location. This other wave of hematopoietic stem cell production occurs in the AGMthe region where the aorta, gonads, and fetal kidney (mesonephros) begin to develop. The cells that give rise to the HSCs in the AGM may also give rise to endothelial cells that line blood vessels. [13]. These HSCs arise at around days 10 to 11 in the mouse embryo (weeks 4 to 6 in human gestation), divide, and within a couple of days, migrate to the liver [11]. The HSCs in the liver continue to divide and migrate, spreading to the spleen, thymus, andnear the time of birthto the bone marrow.

Whereas an increasing body of fetal HSC research is emerging from mice and other animals, there is much less information about human fetal and embryonic HSCs. Scientists in Europe, including Coulombel, Peault, and colleagues, first described hematopoietic precursors in human embryos only a few years ago [20, 53]. Most recently, Gallacher and others reported finding HSCs circulating in the blood of 12- to 18-week aborted human fetuses [16, 28, 54] that was rich in HSCs. These circulating cells had different markers than did cells from fetal liver, fetal bone marrow, or umbilical cord blood.

In 1985, it was shown that it is possible to obtain precursors to many different blood cells from mouse embryonic stem cells [9]. Perkins was able to obtain all the major lineages of progenitor cells from mouse embryoid bodies, even without adding hematopoietic growth factors [45].

Mouse embryonic stem cells in culture, given the right growth factors, can generate most, if not all, the different blood cell types [19], but no one has yet achieved the "gold standard" of proof that they can produce long-term HSCs from these sourcesnamely by obtaining cells that can be transplanted into lethally irradiated mice to reconstitute long-term hematopoiesis [32].

The picture for human embryonic stem and germ cells is even less clear. Scientists from James Thomson's laboratory reported in 1999 that they were able to direct human embryonic stem cellswhich can now be cultured in the labto produce blood progenitor cells [23]. Israeli scientists reported that they had induced human ES cells to produce hematopoietic cells, as evidenced by their production of a blood protein, gamma-globin [21]. Cell lines derived from human embryonic germ cells (cultured cells derived originally from cells in the embryo that would ultimately give rise to eggs or sperm) that are cultured under certain conditions will produce CD34+ cells [47]. The blood-producing cells derived from human ES and embryonic germ (EG) cells have not been rigorously tested for long-term self-renewal or the ability to give rise to all the different blood cells.

As sketchy as data may be on the hematopoietic powers of human ES and EG cells, blood experts are intrigued by their clinical potential and their potential to answer basic questions on renewal and differentiation of HSCs [19]. Connie Eaves, who has made comparisons of HSCs from fetal liver, cord blood, and adult bone marrow, expects cells derived from embryonic tissues to have some interesting traits. She says actively dividing blood-producing cells from ES cell cultureif they are like other dividing cellswill not themselves engraft or rescue hematopoiesis in an animal whose bone marrow has been destroyed. However, they may play a critical role in developing an abundant supply of HSCs grown in the lab. Indications are that the dividing cells will also more readily lend themselves to gene manipulations than do adult HSCs. Eaves anticipates that HSCs derived from early embryo sources will be developmentally more "plastic" than later HSCs, and more capable of self-renewal [14].

Scientists in the laboratory and clinic are beginning to measure the differences among HSCs from different sources. In general, they find that HSCs taken from tissues at earlier developmental stages have a greater ability to self-replicate, show different homing and surface characteristics, and are less likely to be rejected by the immune systemmaking them potentially more useful for therapeutic transplantation.

When do HSCs move from the early locations in the developing fetus to their adult "home" in the bone marrow? European scientists have found that the relative number of CD34+ cells in the collections of cord blood declined with gestational age, but expression of cell-adhesion molecules on these cells increased.

The authors believe these changes reflect preparations for the cells to relocatefrom homing in fetal liver to homing in bone marrow [52].

The point is controversial, but a paper by Chen et al. provides evidence that at least in some strains of mice, HSCs from old mice are less able to repopulate bone marrow after transplantation than are cells from young adult mice [5]. Cells from fetal mice were 50 to 100 percent better at repopulating marrow than were cells from young adult mice were. The specific potential for repopulating marrow appears to be strain-specific, but the scientists found this potential declined with age for both strains. Other scientists find no decreases or sometimes increases in numbers of HSCs with age [51]. Because of the difficulty in identifying a long-term stem cell, it remains difficult to quantify changes in numbers of HSCs as a person ages.

A practical and important difference between HSCs collected from adult human donors and from umbilical cord blood is simply quantitative. Doctors are rarely able to extract more than a few million HSCs from a placenta and umbilical cordtoo few to use in a transplant for an adult, who would ideally get 7 to 10 million CD34+ cells per kilogram body weight, but often adequate for a transplant for a child [33, 48].

Leonard Zon says that HSCs from cord blood are less likely to cause a transplantation complication called graft-versus-host disease, in which white blood cells from a donor attack tissues of the recipient [65]. In a recent review of umbilical cord blood transplantation, Laughlin cites evidence that cord blood causes less graft-versus-host disease [31]. Laughlin writes that it is yet to be determined whether umbilical cord blood HSCs are, in fact, longer lived in a transplant recipient.

In lab and mouse-model tests comparing CD34+ cells from human cord with CD34+ cells derived from adult bone marrow, researchers found cord blood had greater proliferation capacity [24]. White blood cells from cord blood engrafted better in a mouse model, which was genetically altered to tolerate the human cells, than did their adult counterparts.

In addition to being far easier to collect, peripherally harvested white blood cells have other advantages over bone marrow. Cutler and Antin's review says that peripherally harvested cells engraft more quickly, but are more likely to cause graft-versus-host disease [8]. Prospecting for the most receptive HSCs for gene therapy, Orlic and colleagues found that mouse HSCs mobilized with cytokines were more likely to take up genes from a viral vector than were non-mobilized bone marrow HSCs [43].

As stated earlier, an HSC in the bone marrow has four actions in its repertoire: 1) it can renew itself, 2) it can differentiate, 3) it can mobilize out of the bone marrow into circulation (or the reverse), or 4) it can undergo programmed cell death, or apoptosis. Understanding the how, when, where, which, and why of this simple repertoire will allow researchers to manipulate and use HSCs for tissue and organ repair.

Scientists have had a tough time trying to growor even maintaintrue stem cells in culture. This is an important goal because cultures of HSCs that could maintain their characteristic properties of self-renewal and lack of differentiation could provide an unlimited source of cells for therapeutic transplantation and study. When bone marrow or blood cells are observed in culture, one often observes large increases in the number of cells. This usually reflects an increase in differentiation of cells to progenitor cells that can give rise to different lineages of blood cells but cannot renew themselves. True stem cells divide and replace themselves slowly in adult bone marrow.

New tools for gene-expression analysis will now allow scientists to study developmental changes in telomerase activity and telomeres. Telomeres are regions of DNA found at the end of chromosomes that are extended by the enzyme telomerase. Telomerase activity is necessary for cells to proliferate and activity decreases with age leading to shortened telomeres. Scientists hypothesize that declines in stem cell renewal will be associated with declines in telomere length and telomerase activity. Telomerase activity in hematopoietic cells is associated with self-renewal potential [40].

Because self-renewal divisions are rare, hard to induce in culture, and difficult to prove, scientists do not have a definitive answer to the burning question: what putsor perhaps keepsHSCs in a self-renewal division mode? HSCs injected into an anemic patient or mouseor one whose HSCs have otherwise been suppressed or killedwill home to the bone marrow and undergo active division to both replenish all the different types of blood cells and yield additional self-renewing HSCs. But exactly how this happens remains a mystery that scientists are struggling to solve by manipulating cultures of HSCs in the laboratory.

Two recent examples of progress in the culturing studies of mouse HSCs are by Ema and coworkers and Audet and colleagues [2, 15]. Ema et al. found that two cytokinesstem cell factor and thrombo-poietinefficiently induced an unequal first cell division in which one daughter cell gave rise to repopulating cells with self-renewal potential. Audet et al. found that activation of the signaling molecule gp130 is critical to survival and proliferation of mouse HSCs in culture.

Work with specific cytokines and signaling molecules builds on several earlier studies demonstrating modest increases in the numbers of stem cells that could be induced briefly in culture. For example, Van Zant and colleagues used continuous-perfusion culture and bioreactors in an attempt to boost human HSC numbers in single cord blood samples incubated for one to two weeks [58]. They obtained a 20-fold increase in "long-term culture initiating cells."

More clues on how to increase numbers of stem cells may come from looking at other animals and various developmental stages. During early developmental stagesin the fetal liver, for exampleHSCs may undergo more active cell division to increase their numbers, but later in life, they divide far less often [30, 42]. Culturing HSCs from 10- and 11-day-old mouse embryos, Elaine Dzierzak at Erasmus University in the Netherlands finds she can get a 15-fold increase in HSCs within the first 2 or 3 days after she removes the AGM from the embryos [38]. Dzierzak recognizes that this is dramatically different from anything seen with adult stem cells and suggests it is a difference with practical importance. She suspects that the increase is not so much a response to what is going on in the culture but rather, it represents the developmental momentum of this specific embryonic tissue. That is, it is the inevitable consequence of divisions that were cued by that specific embryonic microenvironment. After five days, the number of HSCs plateaus and can be maintained for up to a month. Dzierzak says that the key to understanding how adult-derived HSCs can be expanded and manipulated for clinical purposes may very well be found by defining the cellular composition and complex molecular signals in the AGM region during development [13].

In another approach, Lemischka and coworkers have been able to maintain mouse HSCs for four to seven weeks when they are grown on a clonal line of cells (AFT024) derived from the stroma, the other major cellular constituent of bone marrow [39]. No one knows which specific factors secreted by the stromal cells maintain the stem cells. He says ongoing gene cloning is rapidly zeroing in on novel molecules from the stromal cells that may "talk" to the stem cells and persuade them to remain stem cellsthat is, continue to divide and not differentiate.

If stromal factors provide the key to stem cell self-renewal, research on maintaining stromal cells may be an important prerequisite. In 1999, researchers at Osiris Therapeutics and Johns Hopkins University reported culturing and expanding the numbers of mesenchymal stem cells, which produce the stromal environment [46]. Whereas cultured HSCs rush to differentiate and fail to retain primitive, self-renewing cells, the mesenchymal stem cells could be increased in numbers and still retained their powers to generate the full repertoire of descendant lineages.

Producing differentiated white and red blood cells is the real work of HSCs and progenitor cells. M.C. MacKey calculates that in the course of producing a mature, circulating blood cell, the original hematopoietic stem cell will undergo between 17 and 19.5 divisions, "giving a net amplification of between ~170,000 and ~720,000" [35].

Through a series of careful studies of cultured cellsoften cells with mutations found in leukemia patients or cells that have been genetically alteredinvestigators have discovered many key growth factors and cytokines that induce progenitor cells to make different types of blood cells. These factors interact with one another in complex ways to create a system of exquisite genetic control and coordination of blood cell production.

Scientists know that much of the time, HSCs live in intimate connection with the stroma of bone marrow in adults (see Chapter 4. The Adult Stem Cell). But HSCs may also be found in the spleen, in peripheral blood circulation, and other tissues. Connection to the interstices of bone marrow is important to both the engraftment of transplanted cells and to the maintenance of stem cells as a self-renewing population. Connection to stroma is also important to the orderly proliferation, differentiation, and maturation of blood cells [63].

Weissman says HSCs appear to make brief forays out of the marrow into tissues, then duck back into marrow [62]. At this time, scientists do not understand why or how HSCs leave bone marrow or return to it [59]. Scientists find that HSCs that have been mobilized into peripheral circulation are mostly non-dividing cells [64]. They report that adhesion molecules on the stroma, play a role in mobilization, in attachment to the stroma, and in transmitting signals that regulate HSC self-renewal and progenitor differentiation [61].

The number of blood cells in the bone marrow and blood is regulated by genetic and molecular mechanisms. How do hematopoietic stem cells know when to stop proliferating? Apoptosis is the process of programmed cell death that leads cells to self-destruct when they are unneeded or detrimental. If there are too few HSCs in the body, more cells divide and boost the numbers. If excess stem cells were injected into an animal, they simply wouldn't divide or would undergo apoptosis and be eliminated [62]. Excess numbers of stem cells in an HSC transplant actually seem to improve the likelihood and speed of engraftment, though there seems to be no rigorous identification of a mechanism for this empirical observation.

The particular signals that trigger apoptosis in HSCs are as yet unknown. One possible signal for apoptosis might be the absence of life-sustaining signals from bone marrow stroma. Michael Wang and others found that when they used antibodies to disrupt the adhesion of HSCs to the stroma via VLA-4/VCAM-1, the cells were predisposed to apoptosis [61].

Understanding the forces at play in HSC apoptosis is important to maintaining or increasing their numbers in culture. For example, without growth factors, supplied in the medium or through serum or other feeder layers of cells, HSCs undergo apoptosis. Domen and Weissman found that stem cells need to get two growth factor signals to continue life and avoid apoptosis: one via a protein called BCL-2, the other from steel factor, which, by itself, induces HSCs to produce progenitor cells but not to self-renew [10].

Among the first clinical uses of HSCs were the treatment of cancers of the bloodleukemia and lymphoma, which result from the uncontrolled proliferation of white blood cells. In these applications, the patient's own cancerous hematopoietic cells were destroyed via radiation or chemotherapy, then replaced with a bone marrow transplant, or, as is done now, with a transplant of HSCs collected from the peripheral circulation of a matched donor. A matched donor is typically a sister or brother of the patient who has inherited similar human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) on the surface of their cells. Cancers of the blood include acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloblastic leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Thomas and Clift describe the history of treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia as it moved from largely ineffective chemotherapy to modestly successful use of a cytokine, interferon, to bone marrow trans-plantsfirst in identical twins, then in HLA-matched siblings [55]. Although there was significant risk of patient death soon after the transplant either from infection or from graft-versus-host disease, for the first time, many patients survived this immediate challenge and had survival times measured in years or even decades, rather than months. The authors write, "In the space of 20 years, marrow transplantation has contributed to the transformation of [chronic myelogenous leukemia] CML from a fatal disease to one that is frequently curable. At the same time, experience acquired in this setting has improved our understanding of many transplant-related problems. It is now clear that morbidity and mortality are not inevitable consequences of allogeneic transplantation, [and] that an allogeneic effect can add to the anti-leukemic power of conditioning regimens"

In a recent development, CML researchers have taken their knowledge of hematopoietic regulation one step farther. On May 10, 2001, the Food and Drug Administration approved Gleevec (imatinib mesylate), a new, rationally designed oral drug for treatment of CML. The new drug specifically targets a mutant protein, produced in CML cancer cells, that sabotages the cell signals controlling orderly division of progenitor cells. By silencing this protein, the new drug turns off cancerous overproduction of white blood cells, so doctors do not have to resort to bone marrow transplantation. At this time, it is unknown whether the new drug will provide sustained remission or will prolong life for CML patients.

Another use of allogeneic bone marrow transplants is in the treatment of hereditary blood disorders, such as different types of inherited anemia (failure to produce blood cells), and inborn errors of metabolism (genetic disorders characterized by defects in key enzymes need to produce essential body components or degrade chemical byproducts). The blood disorders include aplastic anemia, beta-thalassemia, Blackfan-Diamond syndrome, globoid cell leukodystrophy, sickle-cell anemia, severe combined immunodeficiency, X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome, and Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Inborn errors of metabolism that are treated with bone marrow transplants include: Hunter's syndrome, Hurler's syndrome, Lesch Nyhan syndrome, and osteopetrosis. Because bone marrow transplantation has carried a significant risk of death, this is usually a treatment of last resort for otherwise fatal diseases.

Chemotherapy aimed at rapidly dividing cancer cells inevitably hits another targetrapidly dividing hematopoietic cells. Doctors may give cancer patients an autologous stem cell transplant to replace the cells destroyed by chemotherapy. They do this by mobilizing HSCs and collecting them from peripheral blood. The cells are stored while the patient undergoes intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy to destroy the cancer cells. Once the drugs have washed out of a patient's body, the patient receives a transfusion of his or her stored HSCs. Because patients get their own cells back, there is no chance of immune mismatch or graft-versus-host disease. One problem with the use of autologous HSC transplants in cancer therapy has been that cancer cells are sometimes inadvertently collected and reinfused back into the patient along with the stem cells. One team of investigators finds that they can prevent reintroducing cancer cells by purifying the cells and preserving only the cells that are CD34+, Thy-1+[41].

One of the most exciting new uses of HSC transplantation puts the cells to work attacking otherwise untreatable tumors. A group of researchers in NIH's intramural research program recently described this approach to treating metastatic kidney cancer [7]. Just under half of the 38 patients treated so far have had their tumors reduced. The research protocol is now expanding to treatment of other solid tumors that resist standard therapy, including cancer of the lung, prostate, ovary, colon, esophagus, liver, and pancreas.

This experimental treatment relies on an allogeneic stem cell transplant from an HLA-matched sibling whose HSCs are collected peripherally. The patient's own immune system is suppressed, but not totally destroyed. The donor's cells are transfused into the patient, and for the next three months, doctors closely monitor the patient's immune cells, using DNA fingerprinting to follow the engraftment of the donor's cells and regrowth of the patient's own blood cells. They must also judiciously suppress the patient's immune system as needed to deter his/her T cells from attacking the graft and to reduce graft-versus-host disease.

A study by Joshi et al. shows that umbilical cord blood and peripherally harvested human HSCs show antitumor activity in the test tube against leukemia cells and breast cancer cells [22]. Grafted into a mouse model that tolerates human cells, HSCs attack human leukemia and breast cancer cells. Although untreated cord blood lacks natural killer (NK) lymphocytes capable of killing tumor cells, researchers have found that at least in the test tube and in mice, they can greatly enhance the activity and numbers of these cells with cytokines IL-15 [22, 34].

Substantial basic and limited clinical research exploring the experimental uses of HSCs for other diseases is underway. Among the primary applications are autoimmune diseases, such as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and system lupus erythematosis. Here, the body's immune system turns to destroying body tissues. Experimental approaches similar to those applied above for cancer therapies are being conducted to see if the immune system can be reconstituted or reprogrammed. More detailed discussion on this application is provided in Chapter 6. Autoimmune Diseases and the Promise of Stem Cell-Based Therapies. The use of HSCs as a means to deliver genes to repair damaged cells is another application being explored. The use of HSCs for gene therapies is discussed in detail in Chapter 11. Use of Genetically Modified Stem Cells in Experimental Gene Therapies.

A few recent reports indicate that scientists have been able to induce bone marrow or HSCs to differentiate into other types of tissue, such as brain, muscle, and liver cells. These concepts and the experimental evidence supporting this concept are discussed in Chapter 4. The Adult Stem Cell.

Research in a mouse model indicates that cells from grafts of bone marrow or selected HSCs may home to damaged skeletal and cardiac muscle or liver and regenerate those tissues [4, 29]. One recent advance has been in the study of muscular dystrophy, a genetic disease that occurs in young people and leads to progressive weakness of the skeletal muscles. Bittner and colleagues used mdx mice, a genetically modified mouse with muscle cell defects similar to those in human muscular dystrophy. Bone marrow from non-mdx male mice was transplanted into female mdx mice with chronic muscle damage; after 70 days, researchers found that nuclei from the males had taken up residence in skeletal and cardiac muscle cells.

Lagasse and colleagues' demonstration of liver repair by purified HSCs is a similarly encouraging sign that HSCs may have the potential to integrate into and grow in some non-blood tissues. These scientists lethally irradiated female mice that had an unusual genetic liver disease that could be halted with a drug. The mice were given transplants of genetically marked, purified HSCs from male mice that did not have the liver disease. The transplants were given a chance to engraft for a couple of months while the mice were on the liver-protective drug. The drug was then removed, launching deterioration of the liverand a test to see whether cells from the transplant would be recruited and rescue the liver. The scientists found that transplants of as few as 50 cells led to abundant growth of marked, donor-derived liver cells in the female mice.

Recently, Krause has shown in mice that a single selected donor hematopoietic stem cell could do more than just repopulate the marrow and hematopoietic system of the recipient [27]. These investigators also found epithelial cells derived from the donors in the lungs, gut, and skin of the recipient mice. This suggests that HSCs may have grown in the other tissues in response to infection or damage from the irradiation the mice received.

In humans, observations of male liver cells in female patients who have received bone marrow grafts from males, and in male patients who have received liver transplants from female donors, also suggest the possibility that some cells in bone marrow have the capacity to integrate into the liver and form hepatocytes [1].

Clinical investigators share the same fundamental problem as basic investigatorslimited ability to grow and expand the numbers of human HSCs. Clinicians repeatedly see that larger numbers of cells in stem cell grafts have a better chance of survival in a patient than do smaller numbers of cells. The limited number of cells available from a placenta and umbilical cord blood transplant currently means that cord blood banks are useful to pediatric but not adult patients. Investigators believe that the main cause of failure of HSCs to engraft is host-versus-graft disease, and larger grafts permit at least some donor cells to escape initial waves of attack from a patient's residual or suppressed immune system [6]. Ability to expand numbers of human HSCs in vivo or in vitro would clearly be an enormous boost to all current and future medical uses of HSC transplantation.

Once stem cells and their progeny can be multiplied in culture, gene therapists and blood experts could combine their talents to grow limitless quantities of "universal donor" stem cells, as well as progenitors and specific types of red and white blood cells. If the cells were engineered to be free of markers that provoke rejection, these could be transfused to any recipient to treat any of the diseases that are now addressed with marrow, peripheral, cord, or other transfused blood. If gene therapy and studies of the plasticity of HSCs succeed, the cells could also be grown to repair other tissues and treat non-blood-related disorders [32].

Several research groups in the United States, Canada, and abroad have been striving to find the key factor or factors for boosting HSC production. Typical approaches include comparing genes expressed in primitive HSCs versus progenitor cells; comparing genes in actively dividing fetal HSCs versus adult HSCs; genetic screening of hematopoietically mutated zebrafish; studying dysregulated genes in cancerous hematopoietic cells; analyzing stromal or feeder-layer factors that appear to boost HSC division; and analyzing factors promoting homing and attachment to the stroma. Promising candidate factors have been tried singly and in combination, and researchers claim they can now increase the number of long-term stem cells 20-fold, albeit briefly, in culture.

The specific assays researchers use to prove that their expanded cells are stem cells vary, which makes it difficult to compare the claims of different research groups. To date, there is only a modest ability to expand true, long-term, self-renewing human HSCs. Numbers of progenitor cells are, however, more readily increased. Kobari et al., for example, can increase progenitor cells for granulocytes and macrophages 278-fold in culture [25].

Some investigators are now evaluating whether these comparatively modest increases in HSCs are clinically useful. At this time, the increases in cell numbers are not sustainable over periods beyond a few months, and the yield is far too low for mass production. In addition, the cells produced are often not rigorously characterized. A host of other questions remainfrom how well the multiplied cells can be altered for gene therapy to their potential longevity, immunogenicity, ability to home correctly, and susceptibility to cancerous transformation. Glimm et al. [17] highlight some of these problems, for example, with their confirmation that human stem cells lose their ability to repopulate the bone marrow as they enter and progress through the cell cyclelike mouse stem cells that have been stimulated to divide lose their transplantability [18]. Observations on the inverse relationship between progenitor cell division rate and longevity in strains of mice raise an additional concern that culture tricks or selection of cells that expand rapidly may doom the cells to a short life.

Pragmatically, some scientists say it may not be necessary to be able to induce the true, long-term HSC to divide in the lab. If they can manipulate progenitors and coax them into division on command, gene uptake, and differentiation into key blood cells and other tissues, that may be sufficient to accomplish clinical goals. It might be sufficient to boost HSCs or subpopulations of hematopoietic cells within the body by chemically prodding the bone marrow to supply the as-yet-elusive factors to rejuvenate cell division.

Currently, the risks of bone marrow transplantsgraft rejection, host-versus-graft disease, and infection during the period before HSCs have engrafted and resumed full blood cell productionrestrict their use to patients with serious or fatal illnesses. Allogeneic grafts must come from donors with a close HLA match to the patient (see Chapter 6. Autoimmune Diseases and the Promise of Stem Cell-Based Therapies). If doctors could precisely manipulate immune reactions and protect patients from pathogens before their transplants begin to function, HSC transplants could be extended to less ill patients and patients for whom the HLA match was not as close as it must now be. Physicians might use transplants with greater impunity in gene therapy, autoimmune disease, HIV/AIDS treatment, and the preconditioning of patients to accept a major organ transplant.

Scientists are zeroing in on subpopulations of T cells that may cause or suppress potentially lethal host-versus-graft rejection and graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic-transplant recipients. T cells in a graft are a two-edged sword. They fight infections and help the graft become established, but they also can cause graft-versus-host disease. Identifying subpopulations of T cells responsible for deleterious and beneficial effectsin the graft, but also in residual cells surviving or returning in the hostcould allow clinicians to make grafts safer and to ratchet up graft-versus-tumor effects [48]. Understanding the presentation of antigens to the immune system and the immune system's healthy and unhealthy responses to these antigens and maturation and programmed cell death of T cells is crucial.

The approach taken by investigators at Stanfordpurifying peripheral bloodmay also help eliminate the cells causing graft-versus-host disease. Transplants in mouse models support the idea that purified HSCs, cleansed of mature lymphocytes, engraft readily and avoid graft-versus-host disease [60].

Knowledge of the key cellular actors in autoimmune disease, immune grafting, and graft rejection could also permit scientists to design gentler "minitransplants." Rather than obliterating and replacing the patient's entire hematopoietic system, they could replace just the faulty components with a selection of cells custom tailored to the patient's needs. Clinicians are currently experimenting with deletion of T cells from transplants in some diseases, for example, thereby reducing graft-versus-host disease.

Researchers are also experimenting with the possibility of knocking down the patient's immune systembut not knocking it out. A blow that is sublethal to the patient's hematopoietic cells given before an allogeneic transplant can be enough to give the graft a chance to take up residence in the bone marrow. The cells replace some or all of the patient's original stem cells, often making their blood a mix of donor and original cells. For some patients, this mix of cells will be enough to accomplish treatment objectives but without subjecting them to the vicious side effects and infection hazards of the most powerful treatments used for total destruction of their hematopoietic systems [37].

At some point in embryonic development, all cells are plastic, or developmentally flexible enough to grow into a variety of different tissues. Exactly what is it about the cell or the embryonic environment that instructs cells to grow into one organ and not another?

Could there be embryological underpinnings to the apparent plasticity of adult cells? Researchers have suggested that a lot of the tissues that are showing plasticity are adjacent to one another after gastrulation in the sheet of mesodermal tissue that will go on to form bloodmuscle, blood vessels, kidney, mesenchyme, and notochord. Plasticity may reflect derivation from the mesoderm, rather than being a fixed trait of hematopoietic cells. One lab is now studying the adjacency of embryonic cells and how the developing embryo makes the decision to make one tissue instead of anotherand whether the decision is reversible [65].

In vivo studies of the plasticity of bone marrow or purified stem cells injected into mice are in their infancy. Even if follow-up studies confirm and more precisely characterize and quantify plasticity potential of HSCs in mice, there is no guarantee that it will occur or can be induced in humans.

Grounded in half a century of research, the study of hematopoietic stem cells is one of the most exciting and rapidly advancing disciplines in biomedicine today. Breakthrough discoveries in both the laboratory and clinic have sharply expanded the use and supply of life-saving stem cells. Yet even more promising applications are on the horizon and scientists' current inability to grow HSCs outside the body could delay or thwart progress with these new therapies. New treatments include graft-versus-tumor therapy for currently incurable cancers, autologous transplants for autoimmune diseases, and gene therapy and tissue repair for a host of other problems. The techniques, cells, and knowledge that researchers have now are inadequate to realize the full promise of HSC-based therapy.

Key issues for tapping the potential of hematopoietic stem cells will be finding ways to safely and efficiently expand the numbers of transplantable human HSCs in vitro or in vivo. It will also be important to gain a better understanding of the fundamentals of how immune cells workin fighting infections, in causing transplant rejection, and in graft-versus-host disease as well as master the basics of HSC differentiation. Concomitant advances in gene therapy techniques and the understanding of cellular plasticity could make HSCs one of the most powerful tools for healing.

Chapter 4|Table of Contents|Chapter 6

Historical content: June 17, 2001

Continued here:
5. Hematopoietic Stem Cells | stemcells.nih.gov

Read More...

FDA to crack down on clinics illegally offering stem cell treatments – Marketplace.org

August 30th, 2017 10:41 am

ByMarielle Segarra

August 29, 2017 | 11:35 AM

The Food and Drug Administration announced that it plans to crack down on health clinics that it says are providing unproven, unsafe stem cell treatments.

Stem cells help repair injured tissues in the human body. They can divide and then morph into other kinds of cells red blood cells, muscle cells, whatever our bodies need. Scientists have been trying to figure out whether they can use stem cell injections to treat certain diseases, but for the most part, theres not enough evidence yet that these treatments are safe or that they work.

Nearly600 clinics around the U.S., many in California and Florida, market stem cell treatments, according to a study published last year in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Cell Stem Cell.

Some clinics claim to use stem cells to treat diseases like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrig's disease), Alzheimers disease, and Parkinsons disease. Others offer procedures they say can roll back the effects of aging, like stem cell face-lifts.

"You can just find hundreds of businesses making these unsubstantiated marketing claims," said Leigh Turner, the study's co-author and associate professor at the University of Minnesota's Center for Bioethics, "and that's where you run into a lot of problems in terms of the risk that people are spending thousands or tens of thousands of dollars and effectively being defrauded."

These treatments can also be dangerous, Turner said; in some patients, theyve caused blindness, tumors and even death.

Stem cell treatments are regulated by the FDA, but federal lawleaves some wiggle room. If a clinic meets a few requirements, like only manipulating cells in certain ways before injecting them, it doesnt have to get FDA approval. A lot of providers say they're exempt under this provision, and in some cases, that's not true.

Yesterday, the agency said it would step up enforcement on clinics that are breaking the law. This fall, it also plans to release new guidelines to make it clearer which treatments have to get approval and what the process entails.

Go here to see the original:
FDA to crack down on clinics illegally offering stem cell treatments - Marketplace.org

Read More...

Brain Dead Patients Could Be Brought ‘Back to Life’ in Groundbreaking Stem Cell Therapy – Wall Street Pit

August 30th, 2017 10:41 am

This is not about creating zombies-those so-called living (or walking) dead that are very popular and make a really great theme for TV shows and movies.

Even the Game of Thrones has its version of the living dead with them nasty creatures called White Walkers and Wights.

But then again, thats only science fiction, isnt it? Well, maybe not. In fact, this science-fiction plot could soon play out in real life. Read on.

Researchers from U.S.-based biotech company Bioquark are aimimg to resurrect patients who have been declared brain dead. Yep, you read it right. Resurrect, just like those stories in the Bible. Really bringing back people to life.

It goes without saying that this is really a serious matter. More importantly, Bioquarks small pilot study has been approved and gotten ethical permission by none other than the National Institutes of Health. The study would be an attempt to reawaken the clinically-dead brains of patients who have suffered serious brain injuries.

How will Bioquark do it?

Through stem cell therapy, which has been proven successful already in treating various diseases such as acquired ataxia, Alzheimers disease, Bells Palsy, cerebral atrophy, cirrhosis, optic nerve damage, osteoarthritis, and leukemia.

But, with brain-dead people, its going to be a real challenge since this condition according to medical experts is irreversible.

Brain death is different from a heart thats already stopped beating. A heart can still be revived and sustained by a ventilator or life-support system.

However, in the case of brain death, you cannot revive dead neurons with the help of a life-support machine even though it continues to pump oxygen to the body. The oxygen will get into the other organs like the heart, but it can no longer be utilized by the brain when the neurons are dead.

Neurons are the working units of the brain, specialized cells which are responsible for transmitting information to other nerve cells, gland cells, and muscles.They form networks or connections in the brain which number up to trillions.

A traumatic brain injury, sudden cardiac arrest, or a stroke caused by a ruptured blood vessel in the brain can cause brain tissues to start dying due to oxygen deprivation.

Oxygen-Deprived Brains Timeline:

However, Bioquark is hopeful that stem cell treatment may spur the growth of new neurons to replace the dead ones and pave the way to revive a clinically dead brain. After all, the brain is a fighter and scientists have found out that our gray matter has a small reservoir of stem cells which can produce new neurons.

Researchers are thinking of the possibility of urging these stem cells to generate new neurons which can remedy injured brain tissues. One other option is to inject neural stem cells into the brain of a person who has just died, and these may generate the necessary new neurons to help revive the brain.

Soon, Bioquark will find out the answer or learn some more information from their pilot study which is the first stage of the companys broaderReanima project. The project is exploring the potential of cutting edge biomedical technology for human neuro-regeneration and neuro-reanimation as a way to hopefully give patients and their loved ones a second chance in life.

Bioquark is set to conduct this very first human trial in partnership with the Indian biotech company Revita Life Sciences which specializes in stem cell treatment.

Excerpt from:
Brain Dead Patients Could Be Brought 'Back to Life' in Groundbreaking Stem Cell Therapy - Wall Street Pit

Read More...

FDA, US Marshals Seize Smallpox Vaccine Used for Stem Cell Cancer Treatment – DeathRattleSports.com

August 30th, 2017 10:41 am

Five vials of a live vaccine virus used to inoculate against smallpox were seized by the U.S. Marshals from stem cell treatment centers in California that had been used to treat cancer patients.

The potentially dangerous and unproven treatment combined a live version of the Vaccinia virus vaccine and stem cells that originated in body fat, and injected them directly into patients tumors, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

The treatments were apparently not approved by the regulatory agency.

The FDA will not allow deceitful actors to take advantage of vulnerable patients by purporting to have treatments or cures for serious diseases without any proof that they actually work, said Scott Gottlieb, the FDA Commissioner.

The Vaccinia virus vaccine was instrumental in eradicating smallpox in the 20th century though it does not contain smallpox itself. Currently doses are reserved for people at risk for smallpox, including members of the military who may have to face a bioterrorism event.

The U.S. Marshals seized five vials of the vaccine on Friday. Each of the containers held approximately 100 doses of the vaccine. Four were recovered intact but the fifth had been partly used.

StemImmune touts stem-cell-based immunotherapies capable of unleashing a stealth attack on cancer on its website. The company, which was founded in 2014, also contends it is working with the FDA on an investigational new drug application to allow a Phase I and Phase II clinical trial of its leading product candidate.

In a statement released to Laboratory Equipment, StemImmune said safety of patients is paramount.

StemImmune is fully cooperating with the FDA about the development and use of its stem cell-based investigational cancer therapy, the company said. Our primary concern has and continues to be the safety and well-being of patients in clinical trials and compassionate use programs. At this time, we are working to understand and address the questions raised by the FDA about the use of our therapy for cancer patients in individual compassionate use programs in clinics. As more information becomes available to us, we will update this statement.

The contested treatments were administered to cancer patients at two California Stem Cell Treatment Centers, one in Rancho Mirage and the other in Beverly Hills.

The patients could have had compromised immune systems and may have been at risk for adverse effects like heart inflammation, the FDA contends.

The people who were in contact with the patients may have been at risk additionally for becoming infected with the live virus used in the vaccine. The health effects could have included inflammation and swelling for at-risk unvaccinated people, including those who were pregnant, who had heart or immune system problems, or skin problems like eczema and psoriasis or other conditions, they FDA said.

I especially wont allow cases such as this one to go unchallenged, where we have good medical reasons to believe these purported treatments can actually harm patients and make their conditions worse, added Gottlieb.

Smallpox has been considered eradicated since the last case was reported in Kenya in 1977 although some advocate stockpiling the Vaccinia vaccines in case of a biological weapons terror attack.

See the rest here:
FDA, US Marshals Seize Smallpox Vaccine Used for Stem Cell Cancer Treatment - DeathRattleSports.com

Read More...

There is Life After Death According to Quantum Physics – Edgy Labs (blog)

August 30th, 2017 10:41 am

According to Biocentrism, death is not the end of the journey, but a journey.

Life goes on in a parallel universe regardless of what happens to it in this one.

Now he has departed from this strange world a little ahead of me. Wrote Einstein in a condolence letter upon the death of his close friend, Michele Besso, in 1955. That signifies nothing. For those of us who believe in physics, the distinction between past, present, and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.

Einstein died merely a month after he wrote the letter and, apparently, he was right, as new scientific theories suggest that death, just like life, is but an illusion.

Quantum physics laws tells us that life is not made of matter but of vibrations that escape time and space.

What happens when we die? Where does the human conscience come from? Does the brain perceive or create (then perceive) what we call reality? If consciousness doesnt originate from the brain, then the presence of physical envelopes isnt crucial for it to exist.

I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. Said Max Planck, Nobel Prize-winning physicist, We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.

Biocentrism builds on that and goes on to suggest that consciousness creates the universe or reality, that time and space are mere illusions, manifestations in our minds, and that reality is determined by the observer.

Biocentrism and Relativity predict the same phenomena, but biocentrism, according to its fans, is superior because it does not need to imagine an extra dimension or new mathematics to be formulated.

Biocentrism claims that life is immortal and that its at the center of existence, reality, and the cosmos. By adding life and consciousness to the equation, biocentrism is believed by its adepts to be the theory of everything.

Robert Lanza is a highly qualified scientist and a priori a very serious person. Hes specialized in stem cells, cloning, and regenerative medicine research. Lanza has a distinguished career with articles devoted to him in prestigious publications.

In 2014, he made the Time Magazines list of the 100 most influential people in the world, and in 2015, Prospect Magazine selected him as one of the Worlds Thinkers 2015.

In 2009, Lanza published his book BIOCENTRISM: How Life and Consciousness are the Keys to Understanding the True Nature of the Universe in which he places biology above other sciences and calls for a switch from physics to biology to understand everything.

Dr. Lanza says that he thinks he is succeeding in the unification that Einstein would have failed to achieve, claiming that Einstein only considered reality from the physical side, without giving much thought to biology.

Lanza claims that quantum physics has proved the existence of life after death, that energy is immortal, and so is life.

For Lanza, we believe in death because we have been taught that we are dying, however, biocentrism says the universe exists only because the individual is aware of it.

Life and biology create this reality, and the universe itself does not create life. The concepts of time and space, according to Lanza, are simply tools of our imagination.

Last year, Lanza, along with astronomer Bob Berman, revisited his controversial theory in a new book, Beyond Biocentrism.

Continue reading here:
There is Life After Death According to Quantum Physics - Edgy Labs (blog)

Read More...

Howell Brown, cancer patient who inspired Duke Blue Devils and … – News & Observer

August 30th, 2017 10:41 am

In the nearly five years Howell Brown III was in Durham for cancer treatments, he touched the lives of many including those in Dukes and N.C. Centrals athletics departments.

Howell, a huge NASCAR fan who loved playing with John Deere tractors, was just 9 when he was diagnosed with Stage IV Pineoblastoma. According to St. Judes Childrens Research Hopsitals website, Pineoblastoma is an aggressive and rare type of tumor of the brains pineal gland, a tiny organ located deep inside the brain that secretes ... a hormone called melatonin, which controls sleep.

In November 2012, Howells mother, Sue, brought him from Asheville to Duke Childrens Hospital for treatments. He had surgeries, chemotherapy, radiation and an infusion with his own stem cells. Along the way, walking and eating disorders complicated his condition. In 2015, he learned the cancer had spread to his spine.

Howell died Friday at age 13.

Throughout his illness, Howell became a source of encouragement for others and touched athletes and coaches at Duke and N.C. Central.

Dont give up. Just keep fighting through it even if you dont feel like doing it... Howell said the day he signed a football scholarship with N.C. Central. Youre going to go over the waves and the waves, and youre going to eventually hit the smooth part.

Duke football coach David Cutcliffe and his players met Howell during visits to Duke Childrens Hospital in 2013. Cutcliffe invited him to practices and to hang out with the team.

Duke football coach David Cutcliffe visits with 13-year-old Howell Brown during a team practice session last February. Brown died after a five-year battle with cancer on Friday.

Duke Athletics

In 2014, working in conjuction with Team IMPACT, a Boston company that connects seriously ill children with college sports teams, Howell spent the football season attending N.C. Centrals practices, games and social events.

That same year, during a time Howell was declared tumor-free, he signed a mock football scholarship with the Eagles and attended a press conference to celebrate the event. He played table tennis and bowled with the teams players and coaches.

In February 2016, the Make-A-Wish Foundation sponsored a trip for Howell, a huge NASCAR fan, to attend the Daytona 500.

Howell did his best to help others facing health scares. In April 2016, not long after Charles Westfall, a Duke fan from Morrisville, had been diagnosed with cardiomyopathy and was told he might need a heart transplant, he received an encouraging call from Howell. Westfalls former roommate had met Howell at the Duke football office and gave Howell Westfalls number.

He left a voicemail describing what had happened to him, how it took a year to re-learn to walk after his cancer had spread to his spine, Westfall said Sunday. I can still hear a semblance of that message in that mountain twang in my head.

Photojournalist Viviane Feldman of Hillsborough, who graduated from UNC-Chapel Hill last May, published a photo essay entitled HB3 and Me about Howells battle with cancer.

On Saturday, the day after Howell died, condolences from the athletics programs poured out on social media.

This Young Angel on Earth changed many lives for the better in 13+ years, Duke football coach David Cutcliffe posted on Twitter. Hes now an Angel of Heaven. RIP HOWELL BROWN lll.

Rest In Peace Howell Brown. Thank you for touching our lives & uplifting us with your spirit. N.C. Centrals athletics department tweeted.

Thankful to have known Howell Brown! former Duke football player and current assitant coach Cody Robinson wrote on Twitter . He did more in his short life than most do in a lifetime! Thanks for teaching us how to live HB3!

Jenna Frush, a Duke Medical School student who was a Duke basketball guard from 2011-15, was among a group of people who spent time with Howell daily over the final month of his life.

He was stronger than cancer can ever be, Frush said.

On Saturday, she posted a photo on Instagram of a smiling Howell Brown wearing a Duke T-shirt with these words:

Youre my hero, bud, Frush said. I love you with all my heart.

Originally posted here:
Howell Brown, cancer patient who inspired Duke Blue Devils and ... - News & Observer

Read More...

Preston accepted into OSU’s veterinary medicine program – Sequoyah County Times

August 30th, 2017 10:40 am

Darian Preston of Muldrow, recently began her journey to earn a DVM degree from Oklahoma State Universitys Center for Veterinary Health Sciences. Preston is one of 106 students in the class of 2021 and the daughter of Brent and Charity Preston of Muldrow.

As a land grant university, training the next generation of veterinarians is one of our core missions, said Dr. Chris Ross, professor and interim dean of the veterinary center. We strive to graduate competent veterinarians who can serve the needs of Oklahoma, the nation and the world. Students spend the first three years primarily in the classroom studying anatomy, pharmacology, pathology and more. Their fourth year will be spent honing their clinical skills in our Veterinary Medical Hospital as they apply what they have learned in the classroom to real life cases.

A DVM degree offers veterinarians many career choices including private practice, biomedical research, military service, academia, the pharmaceutical industry, government positions and more. Students in Oklahoma States program will be trained in all species as well as some specialty services, for example, ophthalmology, anesthesia, digital imaging, theriogenology and food animal production.

The class of 2021 is comprised of 58 Oklahoma residents and 48 non-residents representing Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Massachusetts, Maryland, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Toronto, Canada.

Link:
Preston accepted into OSU's veterinary medicine program - Sequoyah County Times

Read More...

Sandites accepted into OSU’s Veterinary Medicine Program – Tulsa World

August 30th, 2017 10:40 am

Kayce Ingram and Nicole Turvey, both of Sand Springs, recently began their journey to earn a DVM degree from Oklahoma State Universitys Center for Veterinary Health Sciences. They are among the 106 students in the class of 2021. Ingram is the daughter of Spencer and Nancy Ingram of Sand Springs. Turvey is the daughter of George and Gay Turvey of Skiatook.

As a land grant university, training the next generation of veterinarians is one of our core missions, Dr. Chris Ross, professor and interim dean of the veterinary center, said in a statement. We strive to graduate competent veterinarians who can serve the needs of Oklahoma, the nation and the world. Students spend the first three years primarily in the classroom studying anatomy, pharmacology, pathology and more. Their fourth year will be spent honing their clinical skills in our Veterinary Medical Hospital as they apply what they have learned in the classroom to real life cases.

A DVM degree offers veterinarians many career choices including private practice, biomedical research, military service, academia, the pharmaceutical industry, government positions and more. Students in Oklahoma States program will be trained in all species as well as some specialty services, for example, ophthalmology, anesthesia, digital imaging, theriogenology and food animal production.

The class of 2021 is comprised of 58 Oklahoma residents and 48 non-residents representing Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Massachusetts, Maryland, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Toronto, Canada.

Read the rest here:
Sandites accepted into OSU's Veterinary Medicine Program - Tulsa World

Read More...

AVMA helping veterinarians take on telemedicine – American Veterinary Medical Association

August 30th, 2017 10:40 am

By Katie Burns

Posted Aug. 30, 2017

The AVMA is providing guidance and soon a toolkit to help veterinarians take on telemedicine in practice.

On July 21 at its regular annual session in Indianapolis, the AVMA House of Delegates passed a policy on telemedicine and accompanying revisions to the Model Veterinary Practice Act, which is a model for state practice acts.

Dr. Lori Teller, District VIII representative on the AVMA Board of Directors, said ahead of the regular annual session of the House that the AVMA has spent more than two years thoughtfully and thoroughly considering the potential impacts of telemedicine on the public and the profession. She updated HOD members on the Association's activities in the area of telemedicine.

In 2016, the AVMA Practice Advisory Panel completed a comprehensive report on telemedicine. In 2017, the Association solicited feedback on the report from members, stakeholders, and the general public. The "Policy on Telemedicine" draws on the report and the feedback.

"Telemedicine is a tool that may be utilized to augment the practice of veterinary medicine," according to the policy. "The AVMA is committed to ensuring access to the convenience and benefits afforded by telemedicine, while promoting the responsible provision of high quality veterinary medical care."

Per the policy, "Given the current state of technological capabilities, available research, and the current state and federal regulatory landscape, the AVMA believes that veterinary telemedicine should only be conducted within an existing Veterinarian-Client-Patient Relationship (VCPR), with the exception for advice given in an emergency until that patient can be seen by a veterinarian."

According to language added to the Model Veterinary Practice Act in 2003, "A veterinarian-client-patient relationship cannot be established solely by telephonic or other electronic means." Much of the telemedicine policy offers guidance on the VCPR in the context of telemedicine.

The new policy also states, "Telemedicine regulations should be harmonized across the nation and strongly enforced to protect patient and public safety."

In a separate action, the House revised the Model Veterinary Practice Act to reflect the new telemedicine policy.

The telemedicine policy notes that federal law requires a VCPR for prescribing drugs in an extralabel manner for animals and issuing veterinary feed directives. Dr. Teller said in her update that the Food and Drug Administration currently does not allow for the VCPR to be established by electronic or telephonic means.

According to the policy, "The AVMA recognizes that future policy in this area will be informed by evidence-based research on the impact of telemedicine on access to care and patient safety."

The AVMA is developing an extensive toolkit and guidelines for members who are interested in using telemedicine in practice, Dr. Teller said. The toolkit and guidelines will include information on policies, laws, and regulations; potential applications; an FAQ; descriptions of various service models; and guidance on monetization. The goal is to have the first phase available by September and the remainder by June 2018.

The AVMA also is in the process of notifying pertinent associations and government agencies about the new policy.

Defining relationships (June 1, 2017)

Advisory panel report offers guidance on telemedicine (March 1, 2017)

Read the original:
AVMA helping veterinarians take on telemedicine - American Veterinary Medical Association

Read More...

Candidates introduce themselves in Indy – American Veterinary Medical Association

August 30th, 2017 10:40 am

Story and photos by R. Scott Nolen

Posted Aug. 30, 2017

Three veterinarians launched their campaigns for the AVMA presidency and vice presidency during the Candidates' Introductory Breakfast July 21 in Indianapolis. Drs. John Howe and Angela Demaree are vying for the office of 2018-19 president-elect, while Dr. Grace Bransford is running for 2018-20 vice president.

Elections will be held next July during the AVMA House of Delegates' regular annual session in Denver.

First to speak was Dr. Howe, a mixed animal practitioner and former practice owner from Grand Rapids, Minnesota. He likened the AVMA to a bridge that not only links the veterinary profession to the veterinarian but also bypasses obstacles to their success. "My vision for AVMA consists of strengthening this bridge," Dr. Howe said.

"AVMA must continue to be the bridge that holds us together with shared goals and objectives, and AVMA must continue to strive for diversity and inclusiveness because that makes us stronger," he explained. "Listening to the concerns of membership is part of maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of the AVMA."

Since 2012, Dr. Howe has represented Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota on the AVMA Board of Directors. He has also served on several AVMA committees and currently chairs the State Advocacy Committee.

A 1977 graduate of the University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine, Dr. Howe spent seven years on the governor-appointed Minnesota Board of Animal Health and was president of the Minnesota VMA, which has endorsed his candidacy for AVMA president-elect.

"I can personally relate to many of your concerns and challenges because I have experienced them," Dr. Howe said. "I am familiar with AVMA operations, and I am an advocate for unity in our profession as we cross our bridge and confront our challenges together."

Next to speak was Dr. Demaree, whose candidacy is endorsed by the Indiana VMA. The sixth-generation Hoosier and Indianapolis native credited determination and commitment to servicecore values instilled in her at an early agefor her career in veterinary medicine and the U.S. Army Reserve Veterinary Corps.

Advocacy remains the top concern of AVMA members, according to Dr. Demaree, a former associate director of the AVMA Governmental Relations Division. "(E)nsuring we are effective advocates for the profession and small business owners will remain a top priority as your 2018 president-elect," she said.

"By using the skill sets that we know veterinarians are best trained forworking together, embracing our diversity, and thinking outside of the boxwe can ensure that we will have a sustainable and thriving veterinary profession for generations to come," Dr. Demaree said.

After receiving her veterinary degree from Purdue University in 2002, Dr. Demaree practiced companion animal and equine medicine before joining the AVMA staff in 2007. Three years later, she joined the Indiana Horse Racing Commission as its equine medical director.

In 2009, Dr. Demaree was commissioned as an officer in the Army Reserve Veterinary Corps, and in 2012, she was deployed to Kuwait in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. She is currently a major in the Army Reserve.

"Our members want the AVMA to continue to provide resources on how to make health and wellness a priority, not just for our patients but also for us, the busy professionals who often put the needs of others above our own," Dr. Demaree said. "As your 2018 president-elect, health and wellness will remain a top priority."

The final speaker, Dr. Bransford, is so far the only candidate for the office of AVMA vice president, currently held by Dr. Stacy Pritt, who is in the final year of her term. The vice president is the Association's official liaison to the Student AVMA and its chapters and is a voting member on the AVMA Board.

Veterinary student debt and wellness are the key issues Dr. Bransford would focus on as vice president. She is a 1998 graduate of the University of California-Davis School of Veterinary Medicine and owns a small animal practice in San Anselmo, California.

Dr. Bransford has served on several AVMA entities, including the 20/20 Vision Commission and the Task Force on Governance and Membership Participation, and is currently a member of the Council on Veterinary Service. Prior to becoming a veterinarian, she worked in advertising for some of the top advertising agencies in the country.

"What do I have to offer?" Dr. Bransford asked. "I have the skills and knowledge from a decade in marketing and advertising working on leading brands. I have nearly 20 years of AVMA volunteer experience working with many different AVMA volunteer staff entities. I've worked in the profession for nearly two decades as an associate and practice owner. And I have the ability to integrate and leverage the unique combination of skills to help drive AVMA's efforts for students and schools forward."

Visit link:
Candidates introduce themselves in Indy - American Veterinary Medical Association

Read More...

Whitehair and Brown win top seats on AVMA Board – American Veterinary Medical Association

August 30th, 2017 10:40 am

Posted Aug. 30, 2017

The AVMA Board of Directors elected Drs. Michael Whitehair and Gary Brown as chair and vice chair, respectively, while meeting July 25 in Indianapolis.

Dr. Whitehair is a mixed animal practitioner from Abilene, Kansas, who has served on the AVMA Board since 2012 when AVMA members in the District IX states of Arizona, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Utah elected him as their representative on the board. Dr. Whitehair joined the Board after spending some 13 years in the House of Delegates, where he was a member of the House Advisory Committee as well as its chair.

In 2008, Dr. Whitehair was part of the selection committee that chose Dr. Ron DeHaven as the new AVMA executive vice president and CEO. Dr. Whitehair chaired the committee that selected Dr. Janet Donlin to succeed Dr. DeHaven when he retired in 2016.

A 1974 graduate of the Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Dr. Whitehair is a partner in the Abilene Animal Hospital. His clinical interests include beef cattle, feedlot, and equine medicine. The practice also includes three veterinarians who are health and production consultants in swine medicine and three veterinarians who focus on companion animal medicine, surgery, and equine practice.

Dr. Brown is a 1984 graduate of the University of Georgia College of Veterinary Medicine and owns a small animal practice in Princeton, West Virginia. He is a former president of the West Virginia VMA and for seven years was a member of the HOD. In 2008, Dr. Brown was elected to the first of his two terms as AVMA vice president. He joined the AVMA Board in 2013 as the District V representative for Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and West Virginia.

Original post:
Whitehair and Brown win top seats on AVMA Board - American Veterinary Medical Association

Read More...

Carpenter receives distinguished service award – Rapid City Journal

August 30th, 2017 10:40 am

The South Dakota Veterinary Medical Association held its 126th annual meeting in Sioux Falls Aug. 13 16.

At that meeting, Dr. Larry Carpenter of Sturgis was the recipient of the Distinguished Service Award.

The Distinguished Service Award is awarded to honor an individual who has brought distinction to the veterinary profession through his/her devotion to the care and well-being of animals, support for the profession, and contributions to the community. This individual exemplifies the profession, both personally and professionally, through support of veterinary medicine, research, colleagues, and/or students and through civic participation. This individuals contributions have advanced the profession and serve as an inspiration to veterinarians and the clients he serves.

Dr. Carpenter graduated from Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine DVM in 1982 (with honor). He received a Masters Degree in Veterinary Surgery in 1991 from Colorado State University College of Veterinary Medicine. He had a Residency in Small Animal Surgery at the University of Colorado from 1988-1991. He attained Diplomate Status with the American College of Veterinary Surgeons in 1992. In 1998, he graduated from the US Army War College.

Dr. Carpenter served in the US Army 25 years, starting as a private (E1) in October 1972 at Ft Leonard Wood, MO. He retired as Director of the Military Working Dog Hospital, Lackland AFB, San Antonio TX at the rank of Colonel (O-6) in August 2003. He served as Consultant to the US Army Surgeon General on Military Working Dogs from 2000 2003.

While deployed to Haiti in 1995, his soldier team conducted Operation Mad Dog in coordination with the Haitian Ministry of Health, the UN Mission to Haiti, the Pan American Health Organization, and the Christian Veterinary Mission. Together, they set up street corner vaccination stations and vaccinated nearly 10,000 dogs and cats against rabies in Port Au Prince Haiti.

After retirement from the military, Dr. Carpenter had a small animal surgical practice, Veterinary Surgical Service PC, from September 2003 to December 2015.

Dr. Carpenter has been married to his wife, Nancy, for 46 years. They have two daughters.

Get news headlines sent daily to your inbox

In addition to his veterinary work, he serves as Secretary of the Sturgis Alliance of Churches and is a member of Christian Veterinary Mission.

The meeting also included continuing education opportunities for over 200 veterinarians and veterinary technicians, recognized outstanding accomplishments by professionals in the veterinary fields, and included the annual membership meeting.

The meeting featured Dr. Jason Sweitzer, DVM, a nationally known speaker on mental health and suicide prevention in the veterinary profession. Companion animal topics included anesthesia and soft tissue surgery.

Large animal topics included calf scours treatment and management, sheep and goat parasitology and medicine, and equine emergency and field procedures, as well as updates from SDSUs Animal Disease Research and Diagnostic Lab.

Go here to read the rest:
Carpenter receives distinguished service award - Rapid City Journal

Read More...

Meritorious Service Award goes to Kaplan – American Veterinary Medical Association

August 30th, 2017 10:40 am

Posted Aug. 30, 2017

The AVMA presented its Meritorious Service Award to Dr. Bruce Kaplan, a staunch advocate of the one-health concept, July 22 at AVMA Convention 2017.

The Meritorious Service Award is conferred on a veterinarian who has brought honor and distinction to the veterinary profession through personal, professional, or community service activities outside organized veterinary medicine and research.

Dr. Kaplan (Auburn '63), a retired veterinarian, formerly worked as a writer, editor, and consultant on public affairs. He resides in Florida and devotes his time to promoting the one-health movement with Laura H. Kahn, MD; Thomas P. Monath, MD; Jack Woodall, PhD; and Dr. Lisa A. Conti, a veterinarian.

The one-health concept is that human, animal, and environmental health are inextricably interconnected. Dr. Kaplan is the primary content manager for the One Health Initiative website, and serves as contributing editor on the editorial board of the One Health Newsletter. He also serves on the scientific advisory board of Veterinaria Italiana; the editorial advisory board of Infection, Ecology & Epidemiology; and the board of the American Veterinary Epidemiology Society.

Dr. Kaplan practiced small animal medicine for 23 years. He held positions in public health with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as an epidemiologist and with the Department of Agriculture's Office of Public Health and Science. He also served as the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service public affairs specialist in California for 14 Western states, and he wrote a JAVMA News column on food safety.

See the original post here:
Meritorious Service Award goes to Kaplan - American Veterinary Medical Association

Read More...

Impact of Existing and Emerging Europe Nanomedicine Market … – MilTech

August 29th, 2017 2:45 am

The global Nanomedicine Market size was estimated at USD XX billion in 2017. Technological advancements coupled with relevant applications in early disease diagnosis, preventive intervention, and prophylaxis of chronic as well as acute disorders is expected to bolster growth in this market.

Download Sample Pages @http://www.kminsights.com/request-sample-33081

Nanotechnology involves the miniaturization of larger structures and chemicals at nanometric scale which has significantly revolutionized drug administration, thus influencing adoption of the technology through to 2022.

Expected developments in nanorobotics owing to the rise in funding from the government organizations is expected to induce potential to the market. Nanorobotics engineering projects that are attempting to target the cancer cells without affecting the surrounding tissues is anticipated to drive progress through to 2022.

Ability of the nanotechnology to serve in diagnostics as well as the therapeutic sector at the same time as a consequence of its characteristic principle to is anticipated to augment research in this sector. Furthermore, utilization of DNA origami for healthcare applications is attributive for the projected growth.

The global nanomedicine market is segmented based on modality, application, indication, and region. Based on application, it is classified into drug delivery, diagnostic imaging, vaccines, regenerative medicine, implants, and others.

On the basis of indication, it is categorized into oncological diseases, neurological diseases, urological diseases, infectious diseases, ophthalmological diseases, orthopedic disorders, immunological diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and others. Based on modality, it is bifurcated into treatments and diagnostics.

The global market is driven by emerging technologies for drug delivery, increase in adoption of nanomedicine across varied applications, rise in government support & funding, growth in need for therapies with fewer side effects, and cost-effectiveness of therapies. However, long approval process and risks associated with nanomedicine (environmental impacts) restrain the market growth.

Download Sample Pages @http://www.kminsights.com/request-sample-33081

Contact:

Mr.Mannansales@kminsights.com+1 (888) 278-7681

About Us:Key Market Insights is a stand-alone organization with a solid history of advancing and exchanging market research reports and logical surveys delivered by our numerous transnational accomplices, which incorporate both huge multinationals and littler, more expert concerns.

Read more here:
Impact of Existing and Emerging Europe Nanomedicine Market ... - MilTech

Read More...

Expert Radiologist and Clinician Scientist, Michelle S. Bradbury, MD, PhD, is to be Recognized as a 2017 Top Doctor … – PR NewsChannel (press…

August 29th, 2017 2:45 am

Michelle Bradbury MD, PhD, who is a Professor of Radiology, Director of Intraoperative Imaging, and Co-Director of an National Cancer Institute awarded Nanomedicine Center (MSK-Cornell Center for Translation of Cancer Nanomedicines), has been named a 2017 Top Doctor in New York City, New York. Top Doctor Awards is dedicated to selecting and honoring those healthcare practitioners who have demonstrated clinical excellence while delivering the highest standards of patient care.

Dr. Michelle S. Bradbury is a highly experienced physician who has been in practice for over two decades. Her career in medicine started in 1997, when she graduated from the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences in Washington, D.C. An internship, residency and then fellowship followed, all completed at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Dr. Bradbury also holds a Doctor of Philosophy Degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Dr. Bradbury is certified by the American Board of Radiology in both Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology. She is particularly renowned, however, as a leading expert in nanomedicine and in neuroradiology, using CT and MRI imaging of the brain, neck and spine to diagnose conditions of the nervous system. Alongside her work in this field she has been at the forefront of nanomedicine research and clinical trials.

Dr. Bradbury keeps up to date with the latest advances in her field through her active membership of professional organizations including the American College of Radiology, the World Molecular Imaging Congress, and the American Society of Nanomedicine. Her expertise and dedication makes Dr. Michelle S. Bradbury a very deserving winner of a 2017 Top Doctor Award.

About Top Doctor Awards

Top Doctor Awards specializes in recognizing and commemorating the achievements of todays most influential and respected doctors in medicine. Our selection process considers education, research contributions, patient reviews, and other quality measures to identify top doctors

See more here:
Expert Radiologist and Clinician Scientist, Michelle S. Bradbury, MD, PhD, is to be Recognized as a 2017 Top Doctor ... - PR NewsChannel (press...

Read More...

Feds seize vaccinia virus vaccine used in ‘stem cell’ centers – CIDRAP

August 29th, 2017 2:45 am

US marshals on Aug 25 confiscated five vials of vaccinia virus vaccine, reserved only for military members and other people at high risk of smallpox, from a California clinic, part of an effort to prevent a company from using potentially dangerous and unproven treatments for cancer patients.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said today in a statement that the treatments belonging to StemImmune, Inc., based in San Diego, were given to patients at the California Stem Cell Treatment Centers in Rancho Mirage and Beverly Hills.

Authorities seized five vaccina virus vaccine vials, each of which contained 100 doses. One vial was partially used, and the other four were still intact. Because the vaccine is not commercially available, the FDA said it has serious concerns about how StemImmune obtained the product and is actively investigating the circumstances.

FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, said in the statement, "Speaking as a cancer survivor, I know all too well the fear and anxiety the diagnosis of cancer can have on a patient and their loved ones and how tempting it can be to believe the audacious but ultimately hollow claims made by these kinds of unscrupulous clinics or others selling so-called cures." In the past, Gottlieb was successfully treated for Hodgkin's lymphoma, according to a May 10 report from the Los Angeles Times.

He added that the FDA won't allow companies to take advantage of vulnerable patients with no proof that the treatments work, especially when there are good medical reasons to believe that the treatments are harmful and could worsen a patient's condition.

The seizure of the vials came after FDA inspections at StemImmune and California Stem Cell Treatment Centers found that the vaccinia vaccine was used to create an unapproved stem cell product, made from excess amounts of vaccine and stem cells derived from body fat. The combination was administered to cancer patients who had potentially compromised immune systems and for whom the vaccine could have triggered serious complications, including myocarditis and pericarditis.

According to the FDA, the unproven treatment was injected intravenously and directly into patients' tumors.

Besides the threat to cancer patients, people in close contact with those who have recently received the vaccinia virus vaccinefor example, pregnant women, people with weakened immunity, and those with certain skin conditionscan experience life-threatening complications after secondary infection.

Gottlieb said he has directed the FDA to vigorously investigate unscrupulous clinics using a full range of enforcement tools. "Our actions today should also be a warning to others who may be doing similar harm, we will take action to ensure Americans are not put at unnecessary risk." He also urged health providers, patients, and consumers to report similar activities and adverse reactions from such treatment to the FDA.

Smallpox was eradicated in 1980, but samples are kept in labs in the United States and Russia for research purposes, and there are concerns that samples that may exist elsewhere may be used for bioterrorism.

In the wake of the terrorist attacks of 2001, the United States has built up a stockpile of three smallpox vaccines: ACAM2000, Aventis Pasteur Smallpox Vaccine, and Imvammune. They contain live vaccinia virus, a cousin of the smallpox (variola) virus. The FDA statement didn't say what formulation was seized by the US marshals.

See also:

Aug 28 FDA news release

May 10 LA Times story

Original post:
Feds seize vaccinia virus vaccine used in 'stem cell' centers - CIDRAP

Read More...

‘Beating Heart’ Patch Offers New Hope for Desperately Ill Patients – NBCNews.com

August 29th, 2017 2:45 am

Let our news meet your inbox.

From clot-busting drugs to bypass surgery, cardiologists have many options for treating the 700,000-plus Americans who suffer a heart attack each year. But treatment options remain limited for the 5.7 million or so Americans who suffer from heart failure, an often debilitating condition in which damage to the heart (often resulting from a heart attack) compromises its ability to pump blood.

Severe heart damage can pretty much incapacitate people, says Dr. Timothy Henry, director of cardiology at the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles. You cant climb a flight of stairs, youre fatigued all the time, and youre at risk of sudden cardiac arrest.

Medication is available to treat heart failure, but its no panacea. And some heart failure patients undergo heart transplantation, but it remains an iffy proposition even 50 years after the first human heart was transplanted in 1967.

But soon, there may be another option.

A patch for the heart

Researchers are developing a new technology that would restore normal cardiac function by covering scarred areas with patches made of beating heart cells. The tiny patches would be grown in the lab from patients own cells and then surgically implanted.

The patches are now being tested in mice and pigs at Duke University, the University of Wisconsin and Stanford University. Researchers predict they could be tried in humans within five years with widespread clinical use possibly coming within a decade.

The hope is that patients will be again to live more or less normally again without having to undergo heart transplantation which has some serious downsides. Since donor hearts are in short supply, many patients experiencing heart failure die before one becomes available. And to prevent rejection of the new heart by the immune system, patients who do receive a new heart typically must take high doses of immunosuppressive drugs.

Heart transplants also require bypass machines which entails some risk and complications, says Dr. Timothy Kamp, co-director of the University of Wisconsins Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Center and one of the researchers leading the effort to create heart patches. Putting a patch on doesnt require any form of bypass, because the heart can continue to pump as it is.

To create heart patches, doctors first take blood cells and then use genetic engineering techniques to reprogram them into so-called pluripotent stem cells. These jack-of-all-trade cells, in turn, are used to create the various types of cells that make up heart muscle. These include cardiomonocytes, the cells responsible for muscle contraction; fibroblasts, the cells that give heart tissue its structure; and endothelial cells, the cells that line blood vessels.

These cells are then grown over a tiny scaffold that organizes and aligns them in a way that they become functional heart tissue. Since the patches would be made from the patients own blood cells, there would be no chance of rejection by the patients immune system.

Once the patch tissue matures, MRI scans of the scarred region of the patients heart would be used to create a digital template for the new patch, tailoring it to just the right size and shape. A 3D printer would then be used to fabricate the extracellular matrix, the pattern of proteins that surround heart muscle cells.

The fully formed patch would be stitched into place during open-heart surgery, with blood vessel grafts added to link the patch with the patients vascular system.

In some cases, a single patch would be enough. For patients with multiple areas of scarring, multiple patches could be used.

Inserting patches will be delicate business, in part because scarring can render heart walls thin and susceptible to rupture. Researchers anticipate that heart surgeons will look at each case individually and decide whether it makes more sense to cut out the scarred area and cover the defect with a patch or simply affix the patch over the scarred area and hope that, over time, the scars will go away.

Another challenge will be making sure the patches contract and relax in synchrony with the hearts onto which theyre grafted. We think this will happen because cells of the same type like to seek each other out and connect over time, Kamp says. We anticipate that if the patch couples with the native heart tissue, the electrical signals which pass through the heart muscle like a wave and tell it to contract, will drive the new patch to contract at the same rate.

How much would it cost to patch a damaged heart? Researchers put the price tag at about $100,000. Thats far less than the $500,000 or so it costs give a patient a heart transplant. And regardless of the cost, researchers are upbeat about the possibility of having a new way to treat heart failure.

Using these patches to repair the damaged muscle is likely to be very effective, says Henry. Were not quite there yet itll be a few years before you see the first clinical trials. But this technology may really provide a whole new avenue of hope for people with these conditions who badly need new treatment options.

FOLLOW NBC MACH ON TWITTER, FACEBOOK, AND INSTAGRAM.

Let our news meet your inbox.

Link:
'Beating Heart' Patch Offers New Hope for Desperately Ill Patients - NBCNews.com

Read More...

The Use of Stem Cells in Osteoarthritis – Miami’s Community Newspapers

August 29th, 2017 2:44 am

Kristin Comella, Chief Science Officer, American Stem Cell Centers of Excellence

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic progressive degenerative disease associated with cartilage loss and degeneration. It is the most common chronic joint ailment, distressing approximately 27 million Americans. OA is influenced by genes, environment (e.g. aging and obesity) and local trauma (e.g. consequences of joint injury or mal-alignment). These factors and more may contribute to the pathological process involved in the degeneration of the knee. Typical treatments include weight reduction, rest, exercise, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), intracellular glucocorticoid injections, visco supplements, physical therapy, and bracing. These modes of treatments merely provide symptomatic relief from pain, failing to prevent cartilage damage and subsequent destruction of other joint tissues. Surgical methods of repair include the transplantation of osteochondral grafts, microfracture, and autologous chondrocyte implantation. According to controlled clinical trials, these methods have limited long term effects on the treatment of OA.

Adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as a candidate cell type with great potential in regenerative medicine. Adult stem cells are found in every part of the body and their primary role is to heal and maintain the tissue in which they reside. Stem cells are unspecialized cells capable of renewing themselves by cell division. In addition, they have the ability to differentiate into specialized cell types. Adult stem cells can be harvested from a patients own tissue, such as adipose (fat) tissue, muscle, teeth, skin or bone marrow. One of the most plentiful sources of stem cells in the body is the fat tissue. In fact, approximately 500 times more stem cells can be obtained from fat than bone marrow. Stem cells derived from a patients own fat are referred to as adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs). Adipose derived stem cells have been explored with respect to their activity in diseases involving significant inflammatory or degenerative components. More recently, adult stem cells have been identified as having the potential to reverse the effects of diseases like OA .

The mixed population of cells that can be obtained from fat is called a stromal vascular fraction (SVF). The SVF can easily be isolated from fat tissue in approximately 30-90 minutes in a clinic setting (under local anesthesia) using a mini-lipoaspirate technique. The SVF contains all cellular elements of fat, excluding adipocytes. Tens to hundreds of millions of ADSCs can be obtained in the context of the SVF acquired from 20-200 ml of adipose tissue during this out-patient procedure. This sets the stage for their practical use at the point-of-care, in which a preparation of ADSCs can be provided for infusion or injection after the mini-liposuction.

Studies that evaluate ADSCs as a potential for articular cartilage regeneration, have shown the cells to develop into chondrogenic lineage. There has also been reported improvements in function and knee joint pain, as well as increased cartilage thickness. Furthermore, a preliminary clinical study showed that SVF cells freshly isolated from adipose tissue, combined with PRP, administered intra-articularly, demonstrate healing potential in patients with degenerative OA. Patients have revealed significant improvements leading to a better quality of life.

Stem cells possess enormous regenerative potential. The potential applications are virtually limitless. Patients can receive cutting edge treatments that are safe, compliant, and effective. Our team has successfully treated over 7000 patients with very few safety concerns reported. One day, stem cell treatments will be the gold standard of care for the treatment of most degenerative diseases. We are extremely encouraged by the positive patient results we are seeing from our physician-based treatments. Our hope is that stem cell therapy will provide relief and an improved quality of life for many patients. The future of medicine is here!

For additional information on our South Miami clinic, visit http://www.americanstemcellcoe.com

Connect To Your Customers & Grow Your Business

Go here to see the original:
The Use of Stem Cells in Osteoarthritis - Miami's Community Newspapers

Read More...

California law supports surrogacy for gay and straight couples with fertility issues – North Bay Business Journal

August 29th, 2017 2:44 am

California is one of the most receptive states in the country for folks who want to enter surrogacy agreements, according to Wright, who practices law in Marin County. Court support through case law for surrogacy in California goes back some 20 years, she said.

In California, a pre-birth court order can grant parental rights in-utero, whether or not the intended parents have any biological connection to the embryo. When the birth certificate comes out, theres no mention of surrogacy, Kimborough said.

Many surrogate mothers report that the most rewarding part of the process is handing over the baby to new parents, who often view the surrogate as angelic. Anyone who knows me knows Im not an angel, Kimborough said, laughing. Surrogates feel that they gain. Its not that we give so much.

Emotional business

The business has powerful emotional underpinnings. There is an altruism that is unparalleled, Wright said.

Intended parents usually come into the process from a place of loss, Wright said. Unfortunately, my husband and I struggled with fertility issues over nearly seven years, she said. She had both miscarriage and late-term pregnancy loss. Through in vitro fertilization with her egg and her husbands sperm, they were able to eventually have a son, now age 6. Along the way, they considered both adoption and surrogacy. Infertility is statistically about a third of the time tracked to the woman, a third to the man and a third inexplicable.

Its a difficult, traumatic thing, Wright said of fertility issues. You hope and then you lose, hope and then you lose internal battles. Surrogates come from the other side. Pregnancy has been easy, fun, family-building. They come together this incredible meeting.

Adoption and surrogacy rarely cross paths, Kimborough said. We dont compete with adoption agencies. Most intended parents choose one route or the other. It has to do with who you are as a person. Adoption contains more unknowns, with no biological connection or history on the mother or pregnancy. Adoption through foster care can be invasive, she said.

Some women in heterosexual couples who cannot have children on their own struggle with allowing another woman to be a surrogate.

Can I watch somebody else carry my child, have another woman in my life who can do something I cant do, Kimborough said, and give my husband something I could not give very emotional parts of being a woman insecurity or hurt thats so deep she cant get past it.

State laws vary on surrogacy

The American Society for Reproductive Medicine issued guidelines for gestational carriers in surrogacy, Kimborough said.

In many states, those receiving a child must go through an adoption process after the child is born, Wright said.

California Assembly Bill 1217, which became law in 2013, amended the Family Code to require a surrogate mother and intended parents to be represented by independent counsel before entering an assisted-reproduction agreement for gestational carriers. The law required that such an agreement include certain information and be notarized or witnessed. Parties to a surrogacy arrangement cannot undergo an embryo transfer or injectable medication for assisted reproduction until such an agreement has been properly executed.

Traditional surrogacy agreements, where the surrogate is the source of the egg, may be structured as pre-planned adoption agreements. Gestational surrogacy, such as the pregnancy of Gamble, is not allowed in some states but is common in California.

See the original post:
California law supports surrogacy for gay and straight couples with fertility issues - North Bay Business Journal

Read More...

Page 947«..1020..946947948949..960970..»


2025 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick