As a species, humans are fortunate in their adaptive capacity. The technologies that make us better equipped to live in a warming world heating, air conditioning, drinking water infrastructure, and the like are part and parcel to modernity, accessible to much, though still too little, of the global population. While we can expect these technologies to become more widespread in emerging economies, there will certainly be a multitude of socioeconomic and political challenges to overcome.
Non-human nature, by contrast, is sharply limited in its capacity to adapt to climate change, and even the best-case mitigation scenarios will put massive pressure on ecosystems. In a 2C world, a full25 percentof species are at risk of regional extirpation (double that in a 4.5C world). Already, climate-related local extinctions have occurred in hundreds of species. These impacts are terrifying and poorly understood. There have been and will continue to be ecosystem thresholds that we cant predict such as the massive pine beetle outbreaks that decimated drought-stricken western forests and biodiversity loss could be worse than projected.
The time is ripe for a conversation about how humans could help adapt the natural world through more direct forms of intervention, a conversation that does not sit comfortably with the values of traditional environmentalism, which regard such intervention with reflexive wariness.
To date, the conservation community has been understandably focused on protecting habitat and reducing emissions to shield non-human life from the impacts of climate change. And while adaptation in the natural world is not a new concept there have beennumerous studies and recommendationsmade in this space direct, technology driven interventions such as translocation, genetic modification, biocontrols, and the use of human infrastructure to support ecosystems have not been part of the mainstream conversation.
Traditional conservation approaches are no longer enough
Climate change will amplify ecosystem stressors like disease, habitat degradation, and invasive species, and indeed already has. Research shows that the effectiveness of disease resistance genes may vary depending on the climate.Big blue-stem, the dominant grass species in tallgrass prairie ecosystems, had higher infection rates when exposed to larger but more infrequent precipitation events, and longer periods of drought. Pathogens may also shift their range as a result of changing conditions, as may also be true ofneedle blight, a fungal disease that impacts ponderosa pine.
Restoring degraded habitat is becoming more challenging as a result of climate change.Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, one of the largest tracts of tidal salt marsh on the West Coast, is the subject of ongoing research to determine the most effective way to restore and maintain the landscape in the face of sea level rise.
Invasive species are another threat being amplified by climate change. Many invasives are able to spread faster as the growing season is extended by earlier spring snowmelt and later fall frost onset. These harmful species are sometimes better able to match shifts in season timing than native species,for example, the invasive plant speciespurple loosestrifeis now blooming in Massachusetts much earlier than its native counterparts. This resilience can be a serious problem as it enhances the ability of invasives to outcompete native species.
On top of amplifying existing stressors, climate change is also triggering more direct impacts in especially vulnerable ecosystems. Already, the majority of tropical coral reefs are projected tosuffer significant losseseven if global warming is limited to 1.5C. The Great Barrier Reef suffered unprecedented bleaching events in 2016 and 2017, whichdamaged two thirdsof the reef, and is in the midst ofyet another the third in five years leaving little time for recovery.
Likewise, kelp forests are being decimated by aseries of connected eventstriggered by warming temperatures. These ecosystems already weakened by marine heatwaves are being devoured by booming populations of sea urchins, precipitated by warmer waters. In northern California, more than 90 percent of bull kelp was lost along 217 miles of coastline, and huge losses have also occurred off the coast of Japan, the Aleutian Islands, and Tasmania.
We need to employ intentional and direct interventions in addition to existing strategies to ensure we pursue every opportunity to prevent biodiversity loss.
Extensive terrestrial impacts are occurring as well. Globally, insect populations have plummeted, and worsening climate change could mean some40 percentof all insect species could go extinct in the coming decades. This will negatively impact the numerous insectivores that depend on them as a food source, and it threatens agricultural sectors dependent on pollinators.
While mitigating climate change and minimizing these existing stressors will be critical first steps to ensuring ecosystems are best able to withstand the worsening impacts of climate change, they are no longer enough to counter the magnitude of the threat. We need to employ intentional and direct interventions in addition to existing strategies to ensure we pursue every opportunity to prevent biodiversity loss.
Translocation
As climate change begins to shift habitats and change the range that species occupy, protected lands and wildlife corridors though critical tools wont always be sufficient. While some species are able to traverse rugged landscapes and cover vast distances, the same cannot be said for many other plants and animals. Amphibians, small mammals, and other species that are endemic to isolated areas are especially vulnerable. If species are not able to naturally disperse as their ranges shift in a changing climate, wildlife managers may need to take a more active role in physically introducing them into new areas.
Historically, wildlife managers have focused on restoring species to their past ranges, and have reintroduced captive-bred individuals to boost endemic populations. But translocation can be used for more than these past practices. It can be used to move species that are unable to disperse naturally, or else can be used as a form of ecological correction by introducing a species to fill a void created by a local extinction of a different species.
The practice is controversial, as people worry that a translocated species will become invasive in its new habitat (or transfer new pathogens) and decimate the ecosystem as a result. Predator translocation is often the most expensive and controversial of these efforts, though it is also often one of the most valuable in terms of improving ecological health by controlling herbivore populations and slowing the spread of wildlife disease.
While there is a risk of unforeseen consequences, there have also been success stories. For example, in England,the marbled white butterflywas successfully translocated to previously unoccupied habitat and was able to establish a viable population without impacting other endemic species. And theAldabra giant tortoisewas introduced to Mauritian islands to replace an extinct Mauritian tortoise species and successfully fulfilled the same seed-dispersal and vegetation-control role the original species filled.
Genetic modification
Restoration efforts will be limited as a result of climate change. Setting funding aside for restoring sand dunes damaged by hurricanes and forests damaged by wildfires will help. But restoring ecosystems to their previous state may no longer be sufficient in some areas. As impacts worsen and vulnerable species are not able to adapt quickly enough on their own, scientists may be able to prevent local extinctions by intervening via genetic modification either through genetic selection or engineering.
TheAmerican Chestnutis a paradigmatic example of a species that will most likely requiregenetic modificationbefore recovery efforts can be successful. These trees once grew up to 100 feet tall and had 10 foot diameter trunks. But in the early 1900s an imported fungus decimated the native Eastern chestnut forests wiping out 99.9 percent of the species and over 100 years later the species still hasnt recovered. That may change. By inserting a gene from wheat into a wild chestnut embryo, scientists are striving to give the vulnerable trees the ability to produce enzymes that detoxify the fungus, and these efforts have already begun to prove successful as modified experimental trees are able to withstand infection.
The black-footed ferret, another example, is extremely vulnerable to Sylvatic plague and suffers from a severe lack of genetic diversity. While captive breeding programs have been successful, these limitations make it difficult to establish populations in the wild. Genetic modification may make it possible to reintroduce lost genetic diversity and convert the vaccine for the Sylvatic plague into a permanent inheritable trait.
Genetic modification offers a host of opportunities to strengthen species that are being wiped out by worsening climate impacts as well. In forested areas damaged by bark beetle outbreaks and severe fires, it would be more effective to reforest with trees that are genetically predisposed to withstand infestations (or drought, or disease, depending on the threats identified in the region). Similar strategies are being employed across many tropical reefs, as scientistscultivate resilient lines of coralin the hopes that they will prove more resistant to the warmer temperatures and increased ocean acidification.
Such strategies could help ensure restoration investments are more secure against future impacts, highlighting the need for the field of conservation genetics as a backstop to the risk of future extinctions. Scientists can bank genetic material, map genomes, and reprogram tissue culture cells for genetic rescue efforts. TheSan Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Researchhas a genetic bank with over 10,000 living cell cultures, oocytes, sperm, and embryos representing nearly 1,000 taxa, and theSvalbard Global Seed Vaultholds over one million seed varieties in order to protect cultivated and wild plant biodiversity.
Human made infrastructure to support ecosystem function
Human infrastructure also has a role to play in conservation, especially for helping species adapt to changing precipitation patterns. In areas where changing precipitation patterns lead to more extreme rainfall events, certain manmade infrastructure can help manage runoff in order to avoid soil erosion in sensitive habitats, and can help protect the habitat of vulnerable species. For example, albatross in Tasmania are struggling to survive as chicks are killed bywarmer temperaturesand nests are washed away by sea-level rise and more frequent and severe precipitation events. Scientists are transportingartificial nestsmade of concrete and coconut fiber by helicopter to the nesting sites in order to increase the chicks chances of survival. So far, scientists have found that pairs using the artificial nests had a 20 percent higher success rate than those using natural nests.
In ecosystems hit especially hard by drought we may be able to transport additional water to help maintain function. InKenya, arid landscapes are predisposed to extended periods with little precipitation, but climate change is exacerbating poor land management to extend these dry periods even further which could spell disaster for vulnerable wildlife. Further, lack of water increases conflict between wildlife and people as ranchers struggle to support their own herds. By installing boreholes, water pipes, strategic dams, and other human made infrastructure to bring water from aquifers to the surface and manage current supply, land managers can help ensure wildlife are able to survive changing precipitation patterns.
Biocontrols
Failed biocontrol efforts are often given as cautionary tales against ecosystem intervention. In the early 2000s, the US releasednon-native beetlesto control the spread of an invasive plant called tamarisk. At the time, managers believed the beetle would only inhabit a limited range and would not be able to disperse widely an assumption that proved untrue. The beetle did spread, with the unforeseen cost of decimating the habitat of the endangered southwestern willow flycatcher. There are numerous other stories, such as the extreme failures of cane toad introduction in Australia, and mongoose introduction in Hawaii.
But while there are risks associated with biocontrol interventions, there have also been remarkable success stories. The gypsy moth, which was first brought to the US to breed with the native silkworms, escaped through an open lab window in 1868 and began to decimate deciduous trees across North America. Afungus, found to infect the moths, was discovered in Japan and brought back to the US, and eventually a strain of the fungus was found to effectively spread through the moth population. A coordinated program calledSlow the Spread Program (STS)was funded by Congress in 2000 and has reduced the spread of gypsy moths by more than 70 percent.
Using pathogens and predator species to control the increased spread of invasive species in the face of a changing climate raises several red flags. The thought of a disease jumping host species is almost as frightening as climate change itself, especially given the rapid spread of COVID-19, which scientists believe originated in a live animal market. But biocontrols have been used extensively in agriculture, and highly specialized pathogens and predator species are unlikely to expand beyond the intended target. Scientists are continuing to look for new tools to expand the use of biocontrols beyond the agriculture sector to the natural environment.
Expanding options for conservation
Healthy ecosystems increase human adaptive capacity. Healthy insect populations support the agriculture sector, healthy wetlands provide flood control and clean water, healthy forests provide stable long term carbon storage, and healthy oceans offer a critical source of protein for many developing countries. But as we observed above, humans are unique in our capacity to augment ecosystem services via direct, technology-driven interventions, which is why the impacts of climate change pose a far greater threat to wildlife and ecosystems than to people. Imported pollinators, engineered water infrastructure, and farmed seafood are just a few examples. We have only dimly begun to conceptualize the adaptive limits of the natural world, but we should employ all available tools to protect not just ourselves, but our non-human neighbors.
Lauren Anderson is a climate and energy analyst at the Breakthrough Institute. Follow her on Twitter @LaurenRAnders1. Zeke Hausfather is the Director of Climate and Energy at the Breakthrough Institute. Follow him on Twitter @hausfath
This article was originally published at the Breakthrough Institute and has been republished here with permission. Follow the Breakthrough Institute on Twitter @TheBTI
Read the original post:
Viewpoint: Conservation isn't enough. We need technology to blunt the impacts of climate change - Genetic Literacy Project
- First cow to produce human insulin in its milk created in Brazil - Cosmos - March 18th, 2024
- Engineering the Microbiome: CRISPR Leads the Way - The Scientist - March 18th, 2024
- The de-extinction process to bring woolly mammoths back to life - The Week - March 18th, 2024
- CRISPR gene editing applications are expanding dramatically in agriculture. Here are the latest advances - Genetic Literacy Project - March 18th, 2024
- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) - National Human Genome Research Institute - March 18th, 2024
- Colossal Genetic Breakthrough Could Be the Key to Reviving Wooly Mammoths - Syfy - March 18th, 2024
- Breaking: Crop gene editing greenlighted by European Parliament. Fight over labeling looms as measure moves to the ... - Genetic Literacy Project - February 10th, 2024
- GMOs on the spotlight in East Africa again - The Citizen - February 10th, 2024
- Blog: Let's Not Ignore the Science in the Fight Against Malaria - chimpreports.com - February 10th, 2024
- Genetic engineering techniques - Wikipedia - January 9th, 2024
- 20.3: Genetic Engineering - Biology LibreTexts - January 9th, 2024
- Genetic Modification Techniques and Applications - Technology Networks - January 9th, 2024
- Transformation-associated recombination (TAR) cloning and its applications - EurekAlert - January 9th, 2024
- Are GMOs Safe? The Benefits of Science-Enhanced Foods | TIME - TIME - January 9th, 2024
- Here's the skinny on fast-emerging genetic engineering tools that are rapidly improving global farming - Genetic Literacy Project - January 9th, 2024
- What Fruit Looked Like 100 Years Ago, Before Genetic Modification - Green Matters - January 9th, 2024
- APHIS Reopens Comment Period on Proposed Additional Exemptions for Plants Modified or Produced Through Genetic Engineering - The National Law Review - January 9th, 2024
- Restriction Enzyme Market is set to Reach US$ 647.41 million at a CAGR of 5.7% from the forecast period 2023 to ... - GlobeNewswire - January 9th, 2024
- Genetic engineering - DNA Modification, Cloning, Gene Splicing - December 13th, 2023
- Star Trek: Julian Bashir's Tale of Genetic Engineering and the Complexity of Parental Acceptance - GameRant - December 13th, 2023
- How to Improve Livestock Health, and Cut - Breakthrough Institute - December 13th, 2023
- Opinion | The Genetically-Engineered Tree That Never Was - Common Dreams - December 13th, 2023
- Genome Editing Market Size and Share to Surpass USD 14.5 billion by 2035 | Roots Analysis - Yahoo Finance - December 13th, 2023
- Dallas-Based Colossal Biosciences Aims to De-Extinct the Woolly Mammoth - The Texan - December 13th, 2023
- Revolutionizing probiotic therapy: The emergence of CRISPR-Cas engineered strains - Medical Xpress - December 13th, 2023
- Genetically engineered cell therapies with mRNA lipid nanoparticles for transferrable platelets - Phys.org - December 13th, 2023
- 'Perhaps GMOs are closer to natural processes than we think': How genetic modification mimics natural evolution of ... - Genetic Literacy Project - December 13th, 2023
- Advancements in Genome Editing and CRISPR-Cas9 Technology - Medriva - December 13th, 2023
- Gene Therapy: Unlocking Innovations in Cancer Treatment, Detection, and Drug Development - Securities.io - December 13th, 2023
- Mayo Clinic Research on Genetically Engineered Virus and CAR-T Cell Therapy for Liver Cancer - Medriva - December 13th, 2023
- Global Gene Editing Market Poised for Significant Growth, Projected to Reach $14.28 Billion by 2027 - EIN News - December 13th, 2023
- Principles of Genetic Engineering - PMC - National Center for ... - May 17th, 2023
- Quitting: A Life Strategy: The Myth of Perseveranceand How the New Science of Giving Up Can Set You Free - Next Big Idea Club Magazine - May 17th, 2023
- 18 Human Genetic Engineering - Clemson University - March 29th, 2023
- Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering - Benefits and Risks - March 29th, 2023
- How artificial skin is made and its uses, from treating burns to skin cancer - South China Morning Post - March 29th, 2023
- Genetic Engineering - Meaning, Applications, Advantages and Challenges ... - March 13th, 2023
- Revolutionary Specialty Enzymes Transform Industries, Projected to Reach $2.2 Billion by 2031 - Billion-Dollar - EIN News - March 5th, 2023
- Explained: What is genome editing technology and how is it different from GM technology? - The Indian Express - April 2nd, 2022
- Scribe Therapeutics to Participate in Upcoming Goldman Sachs The New Guard: Privates Leading the Disruption in Healthcare Investor Conference - Yahoo... - April 2nd, 2022
- San Antonio Zoo In Discussions on Woolly Mammoth Project - iHeart - April 2nd, 2022
- Xenotransplantation trials will require adjusting expectations, experts say - STAT - April 2nd, 2022
- 5 Interesting Startup Deals You May Have Missed In March: Restoring The Woolly Mammoth, Faux Seafood And Lots Of Bees - Crunchbase News - April 2nd, 2022
- Synlogic to Present Data on Phenylketonuria and Homocystinuria Programs at the Society for ... - KULR-TV - April 2nd, 2022
- The Bay Area food tech industry is creating more than vegan burgers. Heres whats next - San Francisco Chronicle - April 2nd, 2022
- Student Startup Teams to Compete For $110000 Cash Prize Pool in U of A's Heartland Challenge - University of Arkansas Newswire - April 2nd, 2022
- Should we test for differences in allergen content between varieties of crops and animal species? - Open Access Government - April 2nd, 2022
- Genetic Engineering - Courses, Subjects, Eligibility ... - December 22nd, 2021
- Scientists Used CRISPR Gene Editing to Choose the Sex of Mouse Pups - Singularity Hub - December 22nd, 2021
- Report calls for broad public deliberation on releasing gene-edited species in the wild - EurekAlert - December 22nd, 2021
- RNA and DNA Extraction Kit Market Study | Know the Post-Pandemic Scenario of the Industry - BioSpace - December 22nd, 2021
- Opinion: Allow Golden Rice to save lives - pnas.org - December 22nd, 2021
- It's time for an alliance of democracies | TheHill - The Hill - December 22nd, 2021
- Aridis Pharmaceuticals Announces a Pan-Coronavirus Monoclonal Antibody Cocktail That Retains Effectiveness Against the Omicron variant, other COVID-19... - December 22nd, 2021
- 2021: when the link between the climate and biodiversity crises became clear - The Guardian - December 22nd, 2021
- Wuhan lab leak now the most likely cause of Covid pandemic and the truth WILL come out, experts tell MPs... - The US Sun - December 22nd, 2021
- Biotech ETFs That Outperformed Last Week - Yahoo Finance - December 22nd, 2021
- Human genetic enhancement - Wikipedia - October 5th, 2021
- Viewpoint: Part 1 Opposition stirred by anti-GMO advocacy group propaganda fading in the developing world, as more countries embrace crop... - October 5th, 2021
- Amyris Partners with Inscripta to Enhance Development of Sustainable Ingredients Using the Onyx Genome Engineering Platform - WWNY - October 5th, 2021
- Kingdom Supercultures raises $25m to expand Non GMO suite of microbes to unlock new flavors, textures, and functionalities in food & beverage -... - October 5th, 2021
- Fact check: Genetically engineering your salad with the COVID-19 vaccines? We're not there yet. - USA TODAY - October 5th, 2021
- Making the Transition from an Academic to a Biobusiness Entrepreneur - Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News - October 5th, 2021
- Is The New York Times Finally 'Learning To Love GMOS'? - American Council on Science and Health - October 5th, 2021
- Gene editing, joke theft and manifesting - The Week UK - October 5th, 2021
- Opinion: Saving lives through real social justice - Agri-Pulse - October 5th, 2021
- What is biohacking? - News Anyway - October 5th, 2021
- Science, business and the humanities: CP Snow's 'Two Cultures' sixty years on - TheArticle - October 5th, 2021
- Probiotic Yeast Engineered To Produce Beta-Carotene - Technology Networks - April 17th, 2021
- In the US, Imminent Release of Genetically Modified Mosquitoes To Fight Dengue - The Wire Science - April 17th, 2021
- CRISPRoff: A New Addition to the CRISPR Toolbox - Technology Networks - April 17th, 2021
- A Massive New Gene Editing Project Is Out to Crush Alzheimer's - Singularity Hub - April 17th, 2021
- Grammar of the Genome: Reading the Influence of DNA on Disease - Baylor University - April 17th, 2021
- We cannot let China set the standards for 21st century technologies | TheHill - The Hill - April 17th, 2021
- First GMO Mosquitoes to Be Released in the Florida Keys - Singularity Hub - April 17th, 2021
- Novavax to Participate in University of Oxford Com-COV2 Study Comparing Mixed COVID-19 Vaccine Combinations - BioSpace - April 17th, 2021
- AmunBio and NorthShore University to Advance Cancer Immunotherapy with Engineered Oncolytic Viruses - OncoZine - April 17th, 2021
- StrideBio Announces a Multi-technology License and Master SRA with Duke University to Advance Next-generation Gene Therapies - BioSpace - April 17th, 2021
- ThermoGenesis : The History of Cell and Gene Therapy - marketscreener.com - April 17th, 2021
- EU's refusal to permit GMO crops led to millions of tonnes of additional CO2, scientists reveal - Alliance for Science - Alliance for Science - February 14th, 2021