header logo image


Page 44«..1020..43444546..»

Archive for the ‘Longevity’ Category

100-year-old woman says the key to longevity is drinking wine – Globalnews.ca

Tuesday, July 11th, 2017

The secret to living to 100? This woman is convinced its wine.

Florence Bearse of Bangor, Maine, who recently celebrated her 100th birthday, told WLBZ the key to living a long life is a glass of wine.

I like my wine. Dont take it away from me, she told the broadcaster.

On her birthday, Bearse drank a glass of red, and was also treated to birthday cake, gifts and balloons. Working in the restaurant industry, WLBZ notes, Bearse said she learned how to dedicate her life to serve others.

READ MORE: 100-year-old Doug Snair may be the luckiest Canadian alive

This isnt the first time booze has been lauded for leading to a long life. Other centenarians have attributed their longevity to alcohol: in 2016, Antonio Docampo, who was 107, drank a mix of brandy and red wine daily, Mic reports.

And 105-year-old Eileen Ash, a yoga-loving grandmother in Norwich, England, said two glasses of red wine every day was the true key to living a long and healthy life, the BBC reports.

Vancouver-basedregistered dietitian Desiree Nielsen says the official rule on moderate drinking within a healthy lifestyle, is to consume no more than one standard drink a day for women and two a day for men.

The clincher here is what constitutes a standard drink. A 750-ml bottle should pour five to six drinks. Some wine goblets can easily drain a third of the bottle, she tells Global News.

READ MORE: 100-year-old South Carolina woman marks birthday by attempting to break world record

There have been countless studies on the health benefits of wine, especially red wine. One University of Alberta report found a glass of red wine was equivalent to an hour at the gym, Huffpost U.K. reports, while another study found red wine in moderation could also be beneficial to heart health.

The vast majority of research points to the polyphenols in red wine not white being the beneficial component, Nielsen says. White wine is made by removing the skin of the grapes before fermentation, which is where most of the phytochemical compounds are found. So if youre drinking as part of a healthy lifestyle, red is the better choice.

However, Nielsen says, if you dont drink much, you shouldnt start just because of this research (or because of anecdotes told by booze-loving 100-year-olds). You can get plenty of anti-inflammatory polyphenols from berries, green tea and naturally processed cocoa, she says.

While there is evidence that a moderate amount of wine may have health benefits, we also have to weigh that against the potential risks for the individual, she explains. If there is a strong family history of cancer, it is worth noting that any amount of alcohol consumption above zero increases risk a bit.

READ MORE: Is wine actually good for you? We asked 2 Harvard-educated doctors

If anti-inflammatory living and cardiovascular health are concerns, she says, red wine isnt a bad idea.

To keep your body as healthy as possible, I recommend going at least two or three days without any alcohol consumption, in line with national guidelines. Even better, keep drinks to the weekend most weeks, but just remember, you cant save up your weekly allotment and spend it all in two days.

arti.patel@globalnews.ca

2017Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

See original here:
100-year-old woman says the key to longevity is drinking wine - Globalnews.ca

Read More...

Does the Sardinian Diet Hold the Secret to Longevity …

Monday, July 10th, 2017

Could a diet of cheese, bread and wine be the secret to longevity?

For the people of Sardinia, it just might be, says Dan Buettner, a National Geographic magazine writer and Emmy award-winning documentarian.

Buettner, the noted author of "The Blue Zones: Lessons for Living Longer From the People Who've Lived the Longest," says certain aspects of the Sardinian diet seem to make a difference, adding about six years to life expectancy.

For one thing, the people of Sardinia -- the Italian island located in the Mediterranean -- drink very dark red wine.

That's because combining the Mediterranean diet with the dark wine creates antioxidants that scrub the arteries, Buettner said.

Not surprisingly, Buettner encourages the consumption of nuts, fruits and vegetables, and discourages a lot of meat.

"Meat is a once-a-week celebration," he said. "Not something you heap on your plate several times a day."

Surprisingly, though, he doesn't place too much emphasis on the importance of fish. He says that in the so-called Blue Zones -- the areas of the world he's studied where people live the longest -- fish consumption doesn't seem to be overemphasized.

"The longest-lived diets don't include a lot of fish," Buettner said. "If you're gonna include protein in your diet, I suggest this cheese that the Sardinians eat."

The cheese, called pecorino sardo, is made from the milk of grass-fed sheep, resulting in a product that is high in Omega-3 fatty acids.

Sardinia is also known for having another kind of cheese -- one that actually is infested with live maggots.

That cheese may contain bacteria that are good for the gut.

"We don't know," Buettner acknowledged. "We just know the longest-lived men in the world eat this. And they eat it as a manifestation of toughness."

Here are some things Buettner says you might find on the table in Sardinia:

Carta de musica A thin, whole wheat bread high in vitamin D.

Leavened bread Bacteria used to rise bread also create a variety of substances with positive effects, including vitamins, and lactic acid and may compete against possibly harmful bacteria in the digestive tract.

Fava beans High in fiber and folate.

Cannonau A dark, red wine with the world's highest levels of antioxidants for wine.

Pecorino Sard Comes from grass-fed sheep and is high in Omega 3.

Almonds and hazelnuts

Click here to return to the "Good Morning America" Web site.

Go here to see the original:
Does the Sardinian Diet Hold the Secret to Longevity ...

Read More...

Centenarians Explain Their Secret to Happiness and Longevity

Monday, July 10th, 2017

By Dr. Mercola

Do you want to live to be 100? How about 110, or even 120? Statistically, the younger you are, the greater your chances of reaching those milestonesthat much is known.

There is even a fairly strong possibility that lifespans beyond 150 will be possible in the next few decades as improvements in 3D printing, stem cell, and nanotech continue to improve.

But when it comes to understanding the complexity of human longevity and all of the factors that determine your lifespan, there is much we still don't understand. Researchers have the advantage of an ever-growing pool of centenarians and supercentenarians. Supercentenarians are those rare individuals who live past 110.

Both demographics are growing. And the good news is, most centenarians and supercentenarians are quite healthy until very near the end of their lives. Research tell us that the older the age group, the later the onset of degenerative diseases and cognitive decline.1 Here are a few interesting facts about centenarianswho now represent the fastest growing segment of the American population:2

Scientific explanations for longevity remain elusive. Researchers studying centenarians agree: there is no specific pattern.

There appears to be a connection between your longevity and the age your mother gave birth. Researchers at the University of Chicago Center on Aging found that if your mother was under age 25 when you were born, your chances of reaching age 100 are twice as high as for someone whose mother was older than 25. Makes me grateful my mother was only 19 when she had me.

This presumably has something to do with the robustness of a woman's eggs over time, but this is just one potential factor among many. According to Israeli physician Nir Barzilai of the Institute for Aging Research at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York:8

"There is no pattern. The usual recommendations for a healthy lifenot smoking, not drinking, plenty of exercise, a well-balanced diet, keeping your weight downthey apply to us average people. But not to them. Centenarians are in a class of their own."

Based on years of data from studying centenarians, Barzilai reports that when analyzing the data from his particular pool of centenarians, at age 70:

Despite this, centenarians as a population have 60 percent lower rates of heart disease, stroke, and high blood pressure.9 Depression and other psychiatric illnesses are almost nonexistent. Barzalai is quick to emphasize you should not disregard the importance of making healthy lifestyle choices (such as keeping your insulin level low). He explains:

"Today's changes in lifestyle do in fact contribute to whether someone dies at the age of 85 or before age 75. But in order to reach the age of 100, you need a special genetic make-up. These people age differently. Slower. They end up dying of the same diseases that we dobut 30 years later and usually quicker, without languishing for long periods."

The majority of centenarians do not feel their chronological age; on average, they report feeling 20 years younger. They also tend to have positive attitudes, optimism, and a zest for life. Could it be that personality characteristics and worldviews play a more significant role than genetics, diet, or exercise?

One way to determine this is to ask centenarians questions about how they see the world, what they value, and to what they attribute their own longevity. What are their secrets to aging well? These individuals represent centuries of wisdom that should not be overlooked. So that's what researchers are now doingmining the minds of centenarians for nuggets of wisdom. Regardless of which interviews you read, this is where patterns really DO emerge. In interviews and surveys with centenarians, the following themes come up time and time again when asked to explain why they've lived so long:10

Some jokingly said they attribute their longevity to "avoiding dying." Others give hints to their life philosophy, such as "Find your passion and live it," "Make time to cry," and "Practice forgiveness." Centenarians overwhelmingly cite stress as the most important thing to avoid. Their lives are marked by as many stressful events as the rest of us, but they differ in how well they manage their stress. Rather than dwelling on it, they let it go. And they are very happy people!

Happy people live longerby 35 percent, according to one study.11 Another study found that happiness and contentment increases health and longevity.12 Other studies show optimists live longer than pessimists.13 So it's no surprise that centenarians are a happy and optimistic lot. Positive thoughts and attitudes seem to somehow do things in your body that strengthen your immune system, boost positive emotions, decrease pain, and provide stress relief. In fact, it's been scientifically shown that happiness can alter your genes!

A team of researchers at UCLA showed that people with a deep sense of happiness and well-being had lower levels of inflammatory gene expression and stronger antiviral and antibody responses.14 This falls into the realm of epigeneticschanging the way your genes function by turning them off and on.

Part of your longevity may depend on the DNA you were born with, but an even larger part depends on epigeneticsover which you have more control. Your thoughts, feeling, emotions, diet, and other lifestyle factors exert epigenetic influences every minute of the day, playing a central role in aging and disease.15 Perhaps it's not as important to avoid that bowl of ice cream as it is to feel sheer bliss when eating it... at least, on occasion!

The fact that you can manipulate your genes with happiness doesn't mean you can completely disregard lifestyle choices, as that would be foolhardy. The basics are still importantdiet, exercise, sleep, etc. Research suggests the modern American diet is increasingly low in four important nutrients that have a direct bearing on aging, and our brains are suffering for it. If you hope to one day become a healthy, happy centenarian, you must address the following:16

Vitamin D's list of health benefits is amazingly long, including helping your brain combat the damage from free radicals, which helps prevent cognitive decline. The important factor when it comes to vitamin D is your serum level, which should be between 50-70 ng/ml year-round, and the only way to determine this is with a blood test.

Your skin produces vitamin D in response to ultraviolet light, so sun exposure or a safe tanning bed are the preferred methods of boosting your vitamin D. However, a D3 supplement can be used when necessary. Most adults need about 8,000 IUs of vitamin D3 per day to achieve serum levels of 40 ng/ml. If you take supplemental vitamin D3, you also need to make sure you're getting enough vitamin K2, as these two nutrients work in tandem to ensure calcium is distributed into the proper areas in your body.

Sources

DHA is an omega-3 fat that plays a role in keeping your cell membranes healthy, flexible, and resistant to oxidative stress, which decreases inflammation. Chronic inflammation is a key factor in many degenerative diseases, including dementia. Low DHA is has been linked with depression, memory loss, and even elevated hostility, which reflect its importance to optimal brain function.

The American diet has far too many omega-6 fats and not enough omega-3 fats due to its heavy reliance on processed food. You can boost your DHA by eating more fish, such as salmon and sardines, but so much of the fish today is contaminated with mercury and other toxic compounds that I prefer to take a high quality omega-3 fat supplement such as krill oil.

Folate helps prevent depression, seizure disorders, brain atrophy, and other neurological problems. Folate deficiencies correlate with impaired memory, slowed mental processing and overall cognitive decline, particularly in the elderly. Your body also needs folate to make red blood cells. Folate deficiency has been thought to lead to elevated homocysteine levels, which can be a major contributor to heart disease and Alzheimer's. However, recent studies may have disproven that idea.17

People often confuse folate with folic acid, and it's important to know the difference. Folate is the naturally-occurring form of the vitamin and contains all of the related isomers your body needs for optimal use. Folic acid is the synthetic form of the vitamin that is used in most supplements and in fortified foods.

It is always preferable to raise your folate levels by modifying your diet, as opposed to eating "enriched" foods or taking a multivitamin. Foods rich in folate include egg yolks, sunflower seeds, asparagus, avocados, broccoli, cauliflower, basil, parsley, and greens such as romaine, turnip, collards, and spinach.18 If you do think you need a supplement, make sure it lists "folate" on the label, rather than folic acid, as this suggests food sources were used.

Magnesium plays a role in your body's detoxification processes and is therefore important for minimizing damage from environmental chemicals, heavy metals and other toxins. Even glutathione, considered by many to be your body's most powerful antioxidant, requires magnesium in order to be synthesized. But this important mineral also helps your brain.

Magnesium acts as a buffer between neuron synapses, particularly those involved with cognitive functions (learning and memory). Magnesium "sits" on the receptor without activating it, in effect protecting the receptor from over-activation by other neurochemicals, especially glutamate. Glutamate is an "excitotoxin," which can harm your brain if it accumulates, and magnesium helps prevent this. That's why you often see magnesium advertised as a "calming" nutrient.

Good sources of magnesium are whole organic foods, especially dark green leafy vegetables, seaweed, dried pumpkin seeds, unsweetened cocoa, flaxseed, almond butter, and whey. If you choose to add a magnesium supplement, there are many forms so it can be a bit confusing. A newer type called magnesium threonate is particularly good due to its ability to penetrate cell membranes and cross your blood-brain barrier, which is important for preserving good cognitive function as you age.

There is no magic bullet when it comes to aging well. Generally speaking, the better you treat your body throughout your life, the better your aging experience will be. Most people do not revel in the thought of getting older because, for many, aging is synonymous with aches and pains, forgetfulness and loneliness. It is inevitable that you're going to get older, but I can tell you from personal experience that this need not be a bad thing!

Now, as I approach my 60th birthday in a few months, I am the fittest I have ever beenand I live every day to its fullest potential. I may have been able to run faster when I was younger, but I would never trade that for the muscle strength, flexibility and knowledge I have today. You too can achieve wellness on both physical and mental fronts, at any age. In fact, for me in many ways life continues to get better as the years go by.

Read the original post:
Centenarians Explain Their Secret to Happiness and Longevity

Read More...

Scientists unlock the mystery behind Roman concrete’s amazing … – Mother Nature Network (blog)

Monday, July 10th, 2017

Bloodlust, bad haircuts and the use of urine as a tooth whitener aside, the Romans did a whole lot of things right.

For starters, Romans connoisseurs of conveyance that they were developed the world's first highways, erected massive bridges and aqueducts and introduced the world to the convenience of sewers. But perhaps most notably, the master builders of the Roman Empire constructed hulking concrete edifices that were really built to last.

Calling Roman concrete "an extraordinarily rich material in terms of scientific possibility," Philip Brune, a research scientist at DuPont Pioneer and expert in ancient Roman construction, goes on to tell the Washington Post that it "is the most durable building material in human history, and I say that as an engineer not prone to hyperbole."

Kudos aside, the exact reason why Roman concrete known as opus caementicium, with ingredients including volcanic ash, calcium oxide or quicklime and hunks of volcanic rock which served as an aggregate is so damned durable has remained a mystery. Why has it withstood the test of time while modern concrete, which uses carbon-intensive Portland cement as a bonding agent, tends to crack and crumble into the sea over a relatively short time when exposed to salt water?

In addition to seawalls and subaquatic structures, the Romans built numerous millennia-spanning monuments such as the Colosseum with concrete made from lime, rock and volcanic ash. (Photo: Maria_Globetrotter/flickr)

According to a new study published in American Mineralogist, the answer has been sitting in front of us all along: Salt water, the same substance that hastens corrosion in modern concrete, is what has enabled some Roman piers and seawalls to stand strong for millennia.

More specifically, researchers have found that Roman concrete's seawater-aided endurance results from a chemical reaction that occurs when salt water seeps into the concrete fabric and comes in contact with the volcanic ash. The reaction creates aluminous tobermorite, a mineral that's difficult to produce in laboratory settings. This rare concrete crystal serves as a naturally occurring reinforcement that's matchless in modern times.

The great Roman author Pliny the Elder was certainly on to something when he wrote circa 79 A.D. in his "Naturalis Historia" that frequent lashings by an angry sea only made Roman harbors and seawalls more resilient "a single stone mass, impregnable to the waves and every day stronger."

"Contrary to the principles of modern cement-based concrete, the Romans created a rock-like concrete that thrives in open chemical exchange with seawater, " Marie Jackson, the study's lead author and a geologist at the University of Utah, tells the BBC. "It's a very rare occurrence in the Earth."

A University of Utah press release goes on to explain the chemical process:

"We're looking at a system that's contrary to everything one would not want in cement-based concrete," Jackson explains. "We're looking at a system that thrives in open chemical exchange with seawater."

Excellent. So does this research mean that some day down the line we'll experience a rebirth of ancient Roman building techniques? Will this antediluvian building material be used to as first line of defense when protecting our cities from rising seas unleashed by a rapidly warming planet?

Perhaps but not so fast.

The author of a new study on the chemical process that makes ancient concrete so durable believes that the seawater-strengthened material is the right fit for a proposed Welsh power plant that harnesses the power of the tides. (Rendering: Tidal Lagoon Power)

With the exact ingredients of Roman concrete having been discovered some time ago, Jackson and her fellow mineral cement sleuths now have a greater understanding of the chemical process behind the remarkable longevity of aquatic structures found across the ancient Roman Empire. Yet the exact method employed by Roman builders when mixing this ultra-durable building material remains a mystery. After all, if we knew exactly how they did it, wouldn't we have started replicating Roman concrete long ago?

"The recipe was completely lost," Jackson says in a press release.

While long-lasting, Roman concrete also lacks the compressive strength of Portland cement-based concrete, limiting its applications. And in a society that demands immediate results, structures that take decades centuries, even to gain optimum strength don't seem likely to gain serious traction anytime soon.

And there's another formidable obstacle: The basic aggregate found in Roman concrete volcanic rock collected by Roman builders from the region around present day Naples isn't easy to come by.

"Romans were fortunate in the type of rock they had to work with," Jackson says. "They observed that volcanic ash grew cements to produce the tuff. We don't have those rocks in a lot of the world, so there would have to be substitutions made."

And substitutions Jackson is making. Determined to find a satisfactory modern-day facsimile to reactive Roman concrete, Jackson has teamed with geological engineer Tom Adams to develop a "replacement recipe" composed of aggregate materials (read: rocks) collected from across the American West mixed with seawater pulled straight from the San Francisco Bay.

As the duo work to develop a potential seawater-aggregate mix that could yield the same crack-healing chemical reaction as the Pliny the Elder-beloved building material of civilizations past, Jackson is already thinking of potential applications for modern-day Roman concrete.

Earlier this year, she identified a proposed seawall in Swansea, Wales, as a structure in which Roman concrete would be a highly preferable choice over modern concrete reinforced with cement and steel. She believes that such a structure could potentially hold strong for upwards of 2,000 years.

"Their technique was based on building very massive structures that are really quite environmentally sustainable and very long-lasting," Jackson told the BBC in January. "I think Roman concrete or a type of it would be a very good choice. That project is going to require 120 years of service life to amortise [pay back] the investment."

Despite promises of longevity and putting an end to the planet-harming cement manufacturing process, there are sizable caveats that come along with the idea of protecting Swansea's tidal lagoon the world's first tidal lagoon power plant with a Roman-style seawall. As the BBC elaborates, local steel manufacturers are banking on the ambitious project being built with cement-based, steel-reinforced concrete. The environmental cost of transporting huge amounts of volcanic ash sourced from who knows where to the Welsh coast is also an issue.

"There's many applications but further work is needed to create those mixes. We've started but there is a lot of fine-tuning that needs to happen," Jackson tells The Guardian. "The challenge is to develop methods that use common volcanic products and that is actually what we are doing right now."

Matt Hickman ( @mattyhick ) writes about design, architecture and the intersection between the natural world and the built environment.

View post:
Scientists unlock the mystery behind Roman concrete's amazing ... - Mother Nature Network (blog)

Read More...

Coffee lovers, rejoice! Your favourite hot cuppa can increase your longevity – Zee News

Monday, July 10th, 2017

New Delhi: Coffee, for most people around the globe, is an essential apparatus to help kickstart the day. It is a cup for all seasons and without their favourite brew, the day seems incomplete.

Known for its high caffeine content, coffee has often been on the list of 'things to avoid' given to us by dieticians and health and fitness experts.

However, many studies in the past have shown coffee to contain numerous health benefits like weight loss, improvement in physical performance, reduction in risk of diabetes, protection from Alzheimer's and dementia, among others.

Now, US researchers have come up with some more good news for coffee lovers by concluding that drinking coffee could lead to a longer life!

As per the study, which included the participation of more than 180,000 volunteers, researchers found that people who drank regular or decaffeinated coffee experienced health benefits, such as increased longevity.

The researchers report in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine that people who consumed a cup of coffee a day were 12 percent less likely to die earlier compared to those who didn't drink coffee. This association was even stronger for those who drank two to three cups a day 18 percent reduced chance of death.

Lower mortality was present regardless of whether people drank regular or decaffeinated coffee, suggesting the association is not tied to caffeine.

Claimed to be the largest of its kind, the study had ethnically diverse participants who included African-Americans, Japanese-Americans, Latinos and whites. "Such investigations are important because lifestyle patterns and disease risks can vary substantially across racial and ethnic backgrounds, and findings in one group may not necessarily apply to others."

Since the association (between coffee drinking and longer life) was seen in four different ethnicities, it is safe to say the results apply to other groups, the authors claim. "Seeing a similar pattern across four different populations gives stronger biological backing to the argument that coffee is good for you whether you are white, African-American, Latino or Asian."

According to the authors, although this study does not show what chemicals in coffee may have this beneficial effect, it is clear that coffee "can be incorporated into a healthy diet and lifestyle".

(With IANS inputs)

More:
Coffee lovers, rejoice! Your favourite hot cuppa can increase your longevity - Zee News

Read More...

311’s Nick Hexum On ‘Mosaic,’ Longevity And The Fans : NPR – NPR

Monday, July 10th, 2017

311 (from left: Chad Sexton, Nick Hexum, SA Martinez, Tim Mahoney and P-Nut) released its 12th studio album, Mosaic, earlier this year. Brian Bowen Smith/Courtesy of the artist hide caption

311 (from left: Chad Sexton, Nick Hexum, SA Martinez, Tim Mahoney and P-Nut) released its 12th studio album, Mosaic, earlier this year.

You'd be forgiven if it's been a while since you thought about the band 311; it was the mid-1990s when the Omaha, Neb., quintet's biggest hits, like "Down" and "All Mixed Up," came out. But after 27 years of 311's hard-to-peg sound a meld of rock, reggae, metal, funk, rap and ska hordes of fans are as in love with the band as ever. Billboard recently called 311 "one of the biggest cult bands in America, whether you love or hate them."

That's no exaggeration. 311 has its own Caribbean cruise, where fans can revel in a sea of fellow die-hards. It's got its own cannabis product, a vape pen aptly called the Grassroots Uplifter. And the band even has an unofficial holiday: Legions of devout followers celebrate March 11 (yes, that's 3/11) every two years by making a pilgrimage to a designated site for a special 311 concert that can go on for hours.

The cover art of 311's new album, Mosaic, is made up of almost 10,000 photos of the band's fans. Courtesy of the artist hide caption

The cover art of 311's new album, Mosaic, is made up of almost 10,000 photos of the band's fans.

On 311's 12th studio album, Mosaic, those devoted fans are front-and-center literally. The album's cover art features an image of the band made up of close to 10,000 photos taken with and submitted by fans. Frontman Nick Hexum has said the cover and album title speak to the "collective nature" of 311 and "the bond between the band members and our fans."

Hexum joined NPR for a conversation about navigating the challenges of longevity, the experimental attitude the band adopted in creating Mosaic and the positive message it's tried to spread over nearly three decades of making music. Hear the conversation at the audio link and read on for an edited transcript.

Lakshmi Singh: Bands like Pearl Jam and Nirvana, whose music tapped into youth angst, helped define the 1990s but your music seemed to sway in a different direction. Tell me about that.

Nick Hexum: I addressed it on [the] "Blue Album" in a song called "Misdirected Hostility," where I just felt that I didn't really relate with all the anger. I felt it was a time of prosperity, and we didn't have the Soviets getting ready to blow us up like we did in the '80s ... And these were a lot of suburban kids that were pretty angry about something, and so we felt we were gonna be the antidote for that ... We see the glass as more than half full. And that's the seeds of what turned us into a bit of a cult band, because we had our own unique attitude, and people see it as a way of looking at the world, a lifestyle.

How have the five of you in 311 the same members for the better part of three decades managed to stay together all this time?

Well, you have to be ready to not get your way, and know that what the group conscience decides is gonna be the rule. We know that we're better together than we could ever be apart ... It's like a marriage, and you have to be willing to do things you don't exactly wanna do, and keep the egos in check.

We were happy to find out the other day that we are the fourth-longest-running band of original members out today, with U2 being the first, Radiohead being the second, De La Soul being the third, and we're the fourth. So that's really cool company to be in. And I feel like, who knows, we could just be at the halfway point of our band. We always feel that success is measured in longevity and enjoying the process how long can we get to do something we really love instead of basing it on any sort of sales metric.

You've said that there's always a risk of repeating yourself when you get to album 12. What did it take to keep that from happening on Mosaic?

Really, it was just keeping an eye towards [the idea that] anything that was weird is good. Anything that is new, anything that is fresh those are the ideas that we pursued. And also just mixing up the process: Instead of being in our own little bubble, we asked other people into the room with us to record. ... I think that's an exercise in remaining teachable and being humble to realize that you can learn from others. And I think that's the biggest block that an artist of our age can have, is when you don't reach out, you don't keep mixing it up and bringing new people in, because your ego makes you feel like you can't accept help.

Everything you've just told me makes me think of the track "Wildfire," which sounds a little different than the others.

"Wildfire" was the first song written for Mosaic. ... I wanted something that started big and then had this real trip in the middle. And it goes through this sort of cinematic thing where there's even like beach sounds and waves and seagulls and stuff, because it represents what I'm talking about in the song the calmness of knowing that you have people that will be there for you singing about my family, singing about the band. So it's a very emotional song. And then it ends in a big guitar-shredding, almost classic-rock kind of thing, because at some point there's no words that can express, and you just need to express through music. ... I've had some fans on Twitter say, "You don't need to do epics, just keep it simple." But for me, that's where real creativity lies to just let yourself go.

You decided to end Mosaic with a song called "On A Roll." It seems to be an intimate message to fans what are you telling them?

It's about our longevity, it's a nod to the fans of gratitude. ... You know, the fact that we were able to have 10 top-10 albums [with] sporadic radio support, made us just feel really grateful. And this song, "On A Roll," it's kind of about that feeling of, like we don't have to have anxiety because we have this support of the bandmates, of our fans, and you know, we're on a roll.

Still, some fans have wondered if this is sort of a goodbye letter. Is this it for 311?

No, I don't see that at all. I'm saying, on a roll, here we go, we keep going, this feels good, we've got momentum. I've said before that we could be at our halfway point of our career. And some people say, "Well, you don't wanna be rolling out there in wheelchairs," but who knows? We could still be a good band to see in wheelchairs why not? All we know is that we're gonna do our best today, keep it going and take good care of what we've been so fortunate to find.

Radio producer Dustin DeSoto and web editor Rachel Horn contributed to this story.

Link:
311's Nick Hexum On 'Mosaic,' Longevity And The Fans : NPR - NPR

Read More...

Immune-matching process improved, reports Human Longevity-led study – The San Diego Union-Tribune

Monday, July 10th, 2017

A team led by researchers at La Jollas Human Longevity reports developing a faster and more accurate method for determining immune type. The method will speed up immune matching for organ transplant and other purposes such as treating infectious and autoimmune diseases, the scientists say.

The method characterizes a region of the genome called human leukocyte antigen, or HLA, that regulates the immune system. Located on Chromosome 6, this region contains a high number of short, repetitive DNA sequences.

Because these repeats are so similar, placing them in the correct order is difficult. So even when people have their genome sequenced, the precise HLA type may not be clear. People can have HLA typing done separately, but that adds time and expense, said J. Craig Venter, one of the studys authors.

The study was published July 3 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Go to j.mp/humanhla for the study. Venter was senior author. The first author was Chao Xie.

The Human Longevity-led team invented an algorithm called xHLA to read these sequences correctly. Results are available within about 3 minutes from a desktop computer, instead of several minutes or even hours, the study stated. Moreover, the method helps identity potential matches that purely DNA-based methods would miss.

Making HLA typing a routine part of sequencing will help doctors advance the practice of precision medicine, the study stated.

For example, autoimmune disorder patients often have chronic problems with no exact diagnosis for many years after repeated doctor visits, the study stated. Knowing patients HLA types could lead to early diagnosis and reduce the burden on both patients and the healthcare system.

Venter said Human Longevity now offers HLA typing as part of its genome sequencing service. And in the future, this technology will be omnipresent and in the hands of patients.

If a family member needs a kidney transplant, you can just look it up on your iPhone and compare the sequences, and everybody will know immediately if theres a match in the family, or other places, Venter said.

Popular sequencing technologies cut up DNA into short pieces for sequencing. These pieces are reassembled by computer like an electronic jigsaw puzzle. But the many repetitive components in HLA can fool the computer programs, like similarly shaped or colored jigsaw puzzle pieces can do to a human.

The xHLA algorithm works with sequencing technology from Illumina to improve accuracy. An important component of the algorithm is that it examines the sequence of amino acids the DNA codes for, the study said. This helps accuracy by accepting DNA variations that happen to code for the same amino acid.

Since immune compatibility is determined at the protein level, using these synonymous variations produces a more accurate result than typing by DNA alone.

The problem with DNA-level alignment is that it cannot distinguish synonymous from nonsynonymous mismatches, the study stated. For example, it will rank five synonymous mismatches as more dissimilar than a single nonsynonymous one.

bradley.fikes@sduniontribune.com

(619) 293-1020

More here:
Immune-matching process improved, reports Human Longevity-led study - The San Diego Union-Tribune

Read More...

100-year-old woman’s secret to longevity? Wine – USA TODAY

Saturday, July 8th, 2017

439

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

Centenarian from Maine also says not to "take any baloney."

Try Another

Audio CAPTCHA

Image CAPTCHA

Help

CancelSend

A link has been sent to your friend's email address.

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

USA Today Network Zach Blanchard, WLBZ-TV, Bangor, Maine Published 8:13 a.m. ET July 7, 2017 | Updated 10:58 a.m. ET July 7, 2017

The perfect wine is less about taste buds and more about personality! Buzz60's Lindsey Granger is helping you find your perfect pairing. Buzz60

The birthday girl, Florence Bearse, center, takes a drink of wine during her 100th birthday party at Westgate Center for Rehabilitation & Alzheimer's Care in Bangor, Maine, on Thursday, July 6, 2017.(Photo: WLBZ-TV, Bangor, Maine)

BANGOR, Maine Known for her no-nonsense attitude and sense of humor, Florence Bearse celebrated her 100th birthday Thursday.

At her birthday party at the Westgate Center for Rehabilitation & Alzheimer's Care in Bangor, Maine, Bearse did not shy away from sharing her secret to long life: wine.

I like my wine. Don't take it away from me, she said.

More: 100-year-old never could use free-food-for-life gift

Originally from Massachusetts, Bearse said it did not take long to find the beauty of Maine.

I like my wine. Don't take it away from me.

"Maine is beautiful," she said. "I tell everybody, 'You want a trip? Go to Maine.' "

Bearse said she ran a restaurant in Lagrange, Maine, where she dedicated her life to serving others.

"The people have taken me I think. They understand me ... that I'm crazy," she joked.

More: Want to live past 100? Centenarians share their secrets

Bearse spent much of her time joking around during the party, which was complete with birthday cake, balloons and gifts.

She even had some advice for those looking to make it as far as she has:

"Don't take any baloney, Bearse said.

Follow Zach Blanchard on Twitter:@ZachBlanchard

More: McDonald's gives 100-year-old free food for life

More: You don't have to be a fancy pants to taste wine. Here are the basics

What could be better than having chocolate and wine on Valentine's Day? Roxanne Browning, a chocolate sommelier and founder of ExoticChocolateTasting.com, knows how to put them together and she taught us how to do the perfect pairing. Newslook

1 of 9

Theres a new warm, boozy beverage in town, and its all youll want to sip until summer. Reviewed.com

2 of 9

Knocking back a cold one each day could help keep your "good" cholesterol levels high. Video provided by Newsy Newslook

3 of 9

Some of the best wine in the world is now available at Walmart. Sean Dowling (@seandowlingtv) has more. Buzz60

4 of 9

A Spanish wine company called Gik is introducing the world to an electric blue wine. Mara Montalbano (@maramontalbano) has the details. Buzz60

5 of 9

Take your happy hour on the go with this beverage dispensing travel tote! Dani Bryan (@DH_DaniB) has more Buzz60

6 of 9

In honor of National Wine Day, here are the top five most expensive bottles of wine ever sold. Buzz60

7 of 9

No need to panicjust follow this easy 5-step process to remove red wine from a white tablecloth (or other washable fabric). Time

8 of 9

A study by Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Israel shows people who drank a glass of red wine every night improved their HDL cholesterol levels. Buzz60

9 of 9

How to pair wine with chocolate

This red wine hot chocolate will be your new favorite holiday drink

Cheers! (Moderate) drinking could be good for your heart

Ridiculously cheap award-winning wine now available at Walmart

This new blue wine might change your life

Discreetly take your wine with your wherever you go

Top 5 most expensive wines ever sold

How to Remove a Red Wine Stain

Red wine is magic, now found to improve cholesterol

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2tZnlt0

Originally posted here:
100-year-old woman's secret to longevity? Wine - USA TODAY

Read More...

Greenland sharks beginning to shed their secrets on longevity – Irish Times

Saturday, July 8th, 2017

Greenland sharks are the longest living vertebrates on Earth. Photograph: Julius Nielsen

Greenland sharks, the longest living vertebrates on Earth, which can be found off the northern coast of Ireland, could hold the secret to long life, geneticists mapping their DNA have predicted.

The sharks, which live for up to 400 years, are believed to have unique genes that could help explain not only their remarkably long life span but also life expectancy in other vertebrates including humans.

Prof Kim Praebel of UiT, the Arctic University of Norway, described the sequencing of the DNA from Greenland sharks at a symposium of the University of Exeter this week. Many living Greenland sharks are so old that they pre-date the industrial revolution and the introduction of intensive commercial fishing.

With collaborators, Prof Praebel is searching for unique genes which could hold the secret to the sharks longevity.

They have obtained Greenland shark DNA from tiny clippings from the fin of sharks, which are caught on a line live, tagged and released.

The team has sequenced the full mitochondrial genome (complete DNA information) of almost 100 Greenland sharks, which includes individuals born in the 1750s.

The genetic sequences have helped them understand whether the Greenland shark has evolved specific metabolic adaptations towards extreme longevity, he said.

Their research that suggested the sharks may be up to 400 years old was published in the leading journal Science last year. They are now attempting to find the genes that hold the secret to why the sharks live so long.

They believe the Greenland sharks extreme life span makes it so unique that there is a case for giving it a special conservation status, he added.

This is the longest living vertebrate on the planet. Together with colleagues in Denmark, Greenland, USA, and China, we are currently sequencing its whole nuclear genome which will help us discover why the Greenland shark not only lives longer than other shark species but other vertebrates, he said. The results will help us understand more about the biology of this elusive species.

Its long-life genes could shed light on why all vertebrates have a limited life span, and what dictates the life expectancy of different species including humans, Prof Praebel told the Fisheries Society of the British Isles.

Greenland sharks do not seem to succumb to diseases that kill related species much earlier.

Little is known about the biology and genetics of the Greenland shark which is found in deep waters in the Atlantic ocean from Canada to Norway including north of Ireland and Britain. It is a member of the sleeper shark family that has existed for around 110 million years.

The oldest and largest Greenland shark at just over five meters analysed by the scientists was estimated to be 392 years, plus or minus 120 years, ie at least 272-years- old.

To determine when key indicator proteins were laid down, the scientists deployed radiocarbon dating a method that relies on determining within a material the levels of a type of carbon, known as carbon-14, that undergoes radioactive decay over time.

The DNA study has shed new light on its behaviour, and how it is related to other members of its species living thousands of kilometres away, Prof Praebel added.

Since the Greenland shark lives for hundreds of years, they also have enough time to migrate over long distances and our genetic results showed exactly that. Most of the individuals in our study were genetically similar to individuals caught thousands of kilometres away.

It is still not known where and how the Greenland shark reproduces, but it may prefer to mate in deep hidden fjords of the Arctic. With adult female Greenland sharks known hit sexual maturity only once they reach more than four metres in length, the scientists found that females have to clock up an age of around 150 years before they can produce young.

Equally, there are still far from understanding how and why this elusive species, which feeds on seals and fish, lives so much longer than other sharks and vertebrate species. Other shark species living in the same regions as the Greenland shark live between 30 and 50 years.

Tissues, bones, and genetic data from the shark will also help measure the impact of climate change on the population, when and how contaminants and chemical pollution from industry began to affect the oceans, and the extent to which commercial fishing over hundreds of years has affected the shark population.

The longest living vertebrate species on the planet has formed several populations in the Atlantic Ocean. This is important to know, so we can develop appropriate conservation actions, he said.

Original post:
Greenland sharks beginning to shed their secrets on longevity - Irish Times

Read More...

Financing longevity – The Economist

Saturday, July 8th, 2017

X[o~_j$)Vym/7MvGjB8ZL]nv&'{MSYY%v{ON'q!BB6fC,Wru=gKt}1.=GU'hD;>AMQ""q%xK;J Z8t VP"shrFBZKR6.}NjQ!{h6>+}[gD4Xl#&}v+jCppD*d JYZV0%o08*DnhE*v%G7k1NBpKk~PJKFDv$gA OfMqb5de+No"]Kf4Av1it{'ctGQW7-len+L=7Cz;Xl*!{5.]h,z2aY,%}x3:.!;6} FmcR`pFFgF_E0:fEns~GUput3%:'_Wgp6%P]np ;x"@(aa,-;Gxl+m}~D{6^xB08 h,SVjj#4?@-d]3P!?J[qeNF ^5xq`rOM,a(xIdQzraA1B0VoOWm=6 Qv~;cK8 |^*[ng>A>EE@eQDP sJr LEBGZf*c"{bxuLk1QI3DA`N,N( %i`(2Xg8TlxqL"s"fEe^'#AM3c(z; ITY(:ADdQB" :2D2A21`'qyUTJ!"tF:,B"T)siT<7^)LYqBB$ iy&{7aB"2L8o~Gp0 Qf,Yu7m. !JPrzjB5%bDGGj*q4x&(;(BTf{;g)r7 ILcXHvu iW8FU5ZQt|BTcSJ J-xw n/v]p&KF`[je1YOj:EpX A^p,#td(7mEa&Q09`>mOk#WNI<l^ 8?%pa"MAV`f LJ-UY gjg04/&BVaT!5HD*| j:y89B^TMk9`U'K':!'vlX?`/t %vuY%C&tM _z-z/k9{D4/,h<={=f2cPa2DEV4'!o'0L'DGQRh+oL/<;3: [vx`a>]_`~!smuZtznOF?F~o.Lmj`n?&}bywM_U]}:7U?v^gv6oG}qOmbw@;w0Gjn: ++73+/1*Dh/'6SOy?'4V 8=zz"F {?r=5/x]s8poNB'ZmfN )C?;Aoni$%Y%YN6v'|m/! ;p7'3J/q );'8|qC/ <1Oi{4v|=q3ZkKMx6m'p}>hChDi"m:kC;zq N#;Z'u/Vl{,?l9-_<Pv"NkOSxE;jh9I:%zsV=O:G[G-1K/y}[AM+wk$_G>tPqnMfxCX{Aw KwOtKjHY#t/]C>ENhlM>7,% n5t.GK;)gOaK:u<^mC=_^`?UiMUPa0N3h6^ Mw0~ZoH~S5;q1qw6O|ZnZ,$fuNH+q^B15z $UP2N3u2?mU:05fJ0>4f8!odpRk?LjFdSMAX^B:*'MD?'V:$9_V]*N]$68CyG.Yjl.]r0zHU[L%xu2vW$D.IEl/Kq-GFXT[$+@|!@@{Nu/ e5mb1[|q%D,s>A5'uuKH5 L%ceBv jE?z )UhzwF btlkVODO`wAV1;cx6 U6aZ22GK)s5AN(`C== [APh ^QgI9SL[ighp->f7F_rGWMaUBXg jiN=$ `<}> WVo6C-~<~*jDC/qa_O 36Se_^~]~vO3Y"m H]VcZsX GU4r1M[:'m:Q.R.&$)h[SE%1g9deROKsFxo;Q-_RA 3VrMk4DZH/K?Q*sl~'0OLap-'b" vF0GL6'A{ne~FQw}, X(e2rQ[D)~gMq<@ }"siO#E9g,ZF|RJJ7q]w2Myk'&AS0O-Z_2{D6v C]n0~@,B/;^Mb8mOe #Ij@>7/Lo,#,I#-",%n^0U @@V[Je]IxXY{7^+ >0S_UIY,M*ctqQ)P`rMA:*F%VR@ Hc6"8 TT.(f(PLd6"98>& |rFO<_}c/99H$G QN~D21 );`nhR4hFuCLtt[MDzvd3Mj02doE)d^}o,gB]#[J!(?fa)[oVH_M23Lo'%Iwn1'%) w @B_F>0%F`;%x$s:}G]0S2a6f@-JqZ 4*7&jSp6UqAb +-_$8 kY gJT(_/m>t `e.[~F] z5-5/EFP#F~mVv C?Ex^;tIg 3?5daCcUAh"gvWu FF;LWWzvfbU{1j5{gp}H`rR]Rs 0lN.nB ,C~ZB24prszLU5PafaCzokStIi2'fQ4HOL V=!%K$>VEN-}[B"|[8~(9I H KgH&Q $$5BGK!%@@BXZ;RzgX4|TW>%<3Rhc|*$"4hb*$A@ G #^Q8@! 4nO[o6p3LIj{C~-TY(Q`9n }/ Nt!%Q%A&v9z!_b@xAzUySGkqdfo?wc#u(:.#8E-_wvyi.}P~(J6h5,`S_'JyVo{ 7QO^T;7/-Y1dsnH9:r*=%y# 3GtB1rt2a9Dp(dc,:,C82Q|{pA|MP;IBH&PiC&7(tQ"fs-r,WEeK_n.MYG 0v]b*,L_T(0hcDME8=} ?=oK| zNWT)?S,{`aNT$Ng3CJSpmEz5ZsOfc;!OH(k }0y`iT9WP1Z0[k4VukMU||i.0r]%ij^1g%R(w+N%UcX+qj}b8g}ro7Omu4RcI ~mEH"m&zsxx4ms#KCUMQm}q5^r:|m>,_lh)C-A^^EEoaj/Z"5C[+cUA{'Fbpj-k%FVh(ADkz;v>n:s|{wjdq`/SOPx}]em-nrvSh4Xh eb?Uf?W7Br""Y;e4w` wv}^F& *e^m'OF.[_XSLOuG9P?3O-EQ gLGe:3"#2=LYK"]),}D&wRi#`LT"`b%K)[N4NgSOM?~$?h6Gfs h6GeC')oNynoW(Tf!S!,7}>@%(kcE),1@#BPX;|~c=t$b!k62[|=R0Fdg;Sl-HG-m~Rf"$(U*W|N'Vp?b{B]z=*D#C*)qeXRHC()N60{,,`?@QgxF54%O$n>&&)7#w]/pHG9G66OlNlE?9 qi{m Ji[A^/(s!]i1=:.tA9&t$2:&'#OuZQnp{SCUl?I"LI,BQS#a1>bv62>9}x9%d|2h|~aQ9zR|UdeP{q N11uCY`|2 '.9sctl:CJ0x2?N*b"f/P!;I-CoJfuHN~8iWl7s*OoF}!LjO_5)5]r8]n s[7ga:COZ0ohQi9>bj(9]CXsgY4LL+vcE-v:cpL.20=MM,12a^=M3 ij%*g@5 jW Z~cn)aN@IF}Q)vAeS&( G5nDoeN*sN}O-$nkrTh|,%t&xdBYX-3awhX]Y1/0xWN_O0 Vh3]S-e6|J3hy|ou8%geFXPW+L;iY6 LQl:$rBP=n/d'u@u=qI6@E ~}s[q5|[$l>:ske,b[f6 +c?9e,ewn3r AVhn"Radm+IXP"B9!z#k$MWoDvgdeClG(wu>X8#'1H36%8F(t2Qs/"VsScb0t$:3+S YA M~rXEvE`~UW I21y|}vp17;0zQ>qJ5O` #x9w?poWd#EX[dRfcC?kb!V?|F~eV'uw0 j,6!Pee%@0'lE38kWjqLs XyWk0+'<$c'ad*:{8jg$4B3@>)vC!6%5gK"~OzDxe|1Cv'P Xx%zR;*oJj~<{Kl]9g}1}' ~K+''}.z=k>[j[;~9G]|?M&~Gm3{?6,xdaBHy1Q`Xg@U<;Y92lMMNj6mDheu~uP#yKaAW`tYw6^(T@:VEI RIjVr)3@5W._dP|-T{RD@il ETe+im/nx97a &T%qpxaf7)f&yr$/!aZ+4p%Y*5$Fr3NIz#I)z0h[)(Kq H U."Fts),]Quat7 H6!Lx_]uS?mEW4*Soc'/&qOT$.6mmXsCmQD8O6;HC+N>xOU^,tYc)@5v_FF(C|fi>$g5Gxk@ZaB:` VxB!oEFm8z" K5E8$4[!;gVdNS(#j6) /sV&^zieSiKD]=wPQZ*:QRj`r')^S5H#)h^v}~b'W*O0J2}>Q_uxI<=[8UV wzuW`_~)x_jJ&*$AkxfEZ|#xF7RXAd@CX?An6Dh")`Dq'09^}30cOMVvwS?YD5(G CB;/ on?TJM<@R9|R{'Ak1VRO7tY/bZ>m*c?sh^VY9Pb[aL,pU W5M'CN&yE1D)2*{0-V boQhiO.l:h3l|Rl&nwOV"i[3 ak*2?z4:TKM,lTY_=u62oj@_6R3R(1 drCA90 B.loc[oQT"[@UGPD)0IKE2RVZyXZT)Rs N4E;E*^@w<>[Hz~Am?J27|fO^/Rha#QT&da#}(4Jc[8p #Bv:d0u7!%]"):y/*8&]bOT!d&|+NKw'%d[JXJY|93Lq'DyIK-k|03jT?a'L]UHK[#f6!(;}d9ZA~*-:yZW9Z_Y6nlzF;1Ir9xxgi_"&XKU=3:ZfN]G3A3jiz2j98gyxmJ%q$+s@,Az$.7 xhjp)*Dmq!uk,wBt3bb8mMv'Aqyk#o[8MXq.8-h;YW(l8:0~FX5'9^YI4iSt&) &YKs7#%]:BHU'oBCs,r4u"8G0'o3Bp1{ss6PsX=%s=X@VbOifl`:Z,aByUKWwglR0tb~Z+Zf1pyWWs 07 &przR|gL=h~[x,Twb|s`}7W'j#G_E/b4!a@Z5YX"[>TWGn2 if8BAzV2.o4b;@k+7#Ek>3=f|'A>qjK6Im |g_:]vog-Smb@?]e(0W4HwY3_UEMF SzfF%yR>7!) u5@&7aV>)}J5gpB0)!FU BK]3AD-VbSlH3GVUAajq4 2 9_IBhg&8x/h?L}huVy6k"CeK(i+hyB:leU}-gSy$DE$f(}[&0<,C";R#foLPn5{b 0' Mm#$F7go+sB[0Hj?,LwrMZWUKnG> 4|x./|C.b7V.5)77B##<{{JavgF>sfHM4]Y9Q~|hgQ1nO^fu+_f 3AR#K-_&g7kA08=YW4~ KX^YO4Omms! sE^[1Ul0Y'qb*BM.b)T( 1OgGs`.TQ6 [L4J6:An&ftg:V9xV%%*MK8DPQ$E}sof^uD-cLPvDUe[HX1VDh Vf0Kel5ZB)C1D N!bRK"S-(qJ}o@)`F|qB1gRK>3MLJxGgEw_7ROaZClI=arHU>"/HY%2h4HJ#D.j/A ("?Iw"7nE< VUT &Z>WQ_K.?*"^!wMbE%^~7gZ)C=Wk j%cPx786HP!]M _Q)-XeC|evz6,|B3, 'Pur~A; ~;9h.r7Xm[tuQ6Io SLKXpK+OX'1~?+anXG;9,BxGT>1/W=aWjLq-2j::|_$|640Kq_t!qlC1-_O{WEGezli=j#Ux,%$pg+fC97#63y'8Pn8ldr]{-VahUG~F_-8zHi&I$} y*w^Hl2.Yvt|grFk>}%,hY&w$Y;0d22V(S}8FX=+rM;+++% aX5xDZ"VO;mw"_;BU9+LWS8sJ>|P x!&; W22HDp[ Y?&vLg;mX0C_-d!oT.(@?`]A:. ;s6#zN?Tfcf B*UfeUXtnTOx9aE^uZ"Juz5."r&h5@in=BAtN8Q=~l&r^~oA*Z?taUB:kv2w"XG9UbFAVJ8RyC>l _W7WdV EcHAK(M[,y&KE4afWjlQY$8(@6U,Aep(3fMn,tZ5oQI H.*2U:Pf rD+d`MbwO`;9saK_)M=Rd:f bha_Es^rl8PC-AC1>r36DV'~1}LgKW|.a^pF//}{2;cylG :/n a=R^0elNGoZ&kelkE47Wj&Nez-,9At 4Eh`l6W p546enAKre?Po[][:KpxJ;JPbEdfpk'U

FLE@Dvmnom7nm31t`=VvUh{}HvE}B?f}m=>;Zy[mu95bMB1c_+D*Vbd)!

\VmXA5ZW7!TMl6eWq6Se`}pqj=';&2YH0ob@jEu74=9a-/ `W+.dhW{_).&x,qVp=#JWI> H_I,[5LNkr z.FLBXH}sCjE8 H%{|BIdX1;-~v2/[X:JzKu+u&VX=fm37`DQy4' #UH$`8 G BAoFvik279RyDo9Ds}!A|9QZr]3 pD|Pxr0eG;pW_8@LY~]1bXb.QHbnELH2D% UAd2kPMS3w'yN7@{^,Wd-[4G`NjW3"J_ zd~2{"I8J4daA4Q5::yB|TzQ"PXgTJ0zU#:;|Yr_B&,hGXAfY& DBNFPz5z&"rYlo 9TKx!y*B@n|*g!J^Kse]aC7Vy$6Ea7 =j.'5vZeJ i}^|>cgxMJfUkyGeSD*):)c`QLe?W |htS ~bl@eB|iVj:4~N"$eVR2n4s-wtSy5rK+^b -Q@!UDTA&D PKB'k!M^VWrDN-*C)Y%npA7mzZY W#IjRf '/vl4#Fltp{0Qag9qO]5?WrU)-PvW'hh%W'UT3mB!l%~QBWmes 'ebF(H j aRQf Uzc07EX%GIh~ntAc~;We ha/6Z 1;4%>!.GaSwX#`"An4uoS4`F1"+S0Oa~95NFV!t9SFA9nDbqF;Q9]U ooI8 mnYRp[Wj]@q)K#6nD By_3a~ Z4".y3mM.wbAzx^/M#u+cRnIXU}'KT`APyH3]Tr!){D h/d8;B*qPGBal>b3~h6`UK6!YdVD|rR`8ZiXQ | FaV>X RbwtIJJ:#M-:FTCF~@ $X.E0pLH' V'A(DE?7!Rl1 >uacykC2&(U(^&kHX@mXi1Ie)Y8%zm/+Mhb"L9dap,`HdI&(ux&0TL+5|.e

IJ'P-F/ZX`3b`G(43K"%`3l@#Rk,:@;LeG2vU0e fPxRRbe;F{l%C1K@V O//J2iB*(&J?D!J,Egg!V2MB`K-;G|{2NfLo27F1+i_*2&X 2WAOtw*K~$./sNa(ao^%hVg(;_[`E@^KBX.bS}9S3xs;A.H`wBv @%Pt}E(6jl. 7rBiU4qilY`oxJiwBxencXng5aIdWU Lx|.7kW@r#b7Wyjq546m*;qM)~BCZ'U%Wzy}sqY-9HU/_8:#%BWwV(

XLKQ(bUp-6" b@);rG ^ o@j=hcIYIrn(y$@__@'Ua# yg'vEghq;! ZP@&=~bAzDgM9MkDy&b,1`+*UexxwFFuUTd`[+uE6dov@Q0BjDesuux }.U[Mk lD=m@s'OS1$a cm4mxx$&Ch,un2ba Q!G=%~!bhr|,_*b!q!^}`B&En!AF^;u HtQ/A6(LgqR}b3FSL5.aDHpv/v%^B#0[wx,M}r+|8oTT^.qp6qgvmt0ei(Brp}/teC"JeW =JlpLC4Ey`sz>t9,A(]q>MFT)ZAH sHa9>,rH} E,vsU;4 S]I0]|n,.&2@Sv av 4y

T%?kX3#L63G%h:ttO|+F. .p "j>.+DiBHh4*f3o`W=h@FJ =Bavby/Bal+V)H4(RCT}cWKu5@Nb/6)_}:V!pa@n{UX2Q5o]Ql"3+7Ih: R%D=G5*g=JOG7EiYvnX^R"|Cb&oZUMke+ TaqhyC P[[YHoTtzw

h2/mw Bj$ @LTG H,8@}se`t5w{Ek3O2IXffMiG ml rtyU88S&-H1iy_nAozE7]Kv8 /@=/GYd9UJ$8%lK0a6v~Z]MFzMX;vpgK%[F!!w^L~p[!!QKu(pLU*KROW 0m9TcQ8| `0&^[2%KT+[M4[FB[RDeS*hgytVr@WeIQ`x,"_d;IxP2krKS(wQV$HPg`NZdP[KkKoH*Key)[{D+s@i%S{ 16tBNASj01j~8F5)2-WOOtP@-,)f`7!Ww ~&bl}&>}U")y7e)JQ*Qj5$Pf!X]Qlkz?WcMqe%RWNIFTP`!H-&}h*j$kaO1R]=8xG60a~!F43`X|&.TK%:74KBq]9G9A "Kq6iF])'q9Kvj~P|$)+)CJ(prUlgjUs00=/%!]s?i:4;:! C2P"tQ dN$78':JgqW3XCyX{mourc `+F}9Zp$`A3Klmi `QR&T@Z9

JP"RocI'|wAs]@VOyJZBX0Vb*5|m"y Ii*z-v%5yu1SILJ 0ecf5&qvv,tf'y{Yjmj 6cGey!g,kE_::hK3OpR-=UC,SEOe*>If&Qa#,2OZKS2B.: rWFz`j25w*]>dw0Up$D|?"=X] &HDxkS))S?) r>:oFc7sa% ~c)U1Twz}yjpf>aqrs;Nmxwi' =?a F9>ib0"RelY,I2*C6[1uEhH(6fM wvcAK*T:L~~'%rZTq(6x>{ZorF5r}F>**2$^h(O $[{TJcRAb::i-WyK"U4 PGfD[b2Ghlr7{Wq5`b_L%jw=B FcGFD TAvHprol1c1t;8HY6^`FG@2ca, x'A{P)1nR[9 ]Q6kjCOX,]SYMNM ]NN 2`II% HI7M)p>6mp=:R;0b#utGI3jsW3+nba{Z6b#wj X8{:TW)5-(s3x1)Py^sc&v=+q/CjiW)8C5HuOKk78Ee.ps$:9FdM6'Fd`:k2?VQ,!Yi1hh1q34r9u3eG)p)U05&_tKatl$GWbWO E'u^4pR~ ,y8BPtA=k`N_|6E)v*}W3=cdr{-VdOI`.nA/'-ZP.loJ3VUmqCV@D AP)CmnWAh(%'5@a~n [ >ePdc)qpDiT@r ~E#m[P]-f,c4s:P[-HjFv+zOVA*& s8A8 UV;8?9 {F WBy2>o+_~DjDS8FHm},wtfYef)pFyn6K|l}]GdT>01I 9~lv;{Ho]W*1n8?^`vbw1@Qr0Se}t["f3sNi K*~Z 6,NP_]r(#kkn7M6D!8wR2'c79~|n

MGf0XE1J>_lKB^WdQ}9 Yj7ra.vJtDPvdy|L! "O^poE`#"s62:G&Q'S-H |&[9(R ZEF=L X$C_pqy(2?H9t9T;(Dsd>0 b[i1f(JMaaibM*^LXX*EdQ59m&."N@H(H3AIH%` b9Q19y85C4;'PBPT(!mQ2RL*{xsi9LQiVnVe3%5Uk+p?hk ^(FMt'Sp(I!u*iti

>mZ&kWhIhuVD ;}U ^e=#u6lhJ2imdj)k9mA7*4pZIc qYWkT|m;sx EetM#HP=y*{D[xaEz=.-gg`cUQLXqY3s^@BMq%{mx,H}h$FqCqbiSPwcLI/{UrEu5iC'Vx+@iB@"1mu4e+A -$ buTol@b4.r0$5JU@6#Rw_@4p{ =k,n t}6~PA/]0GUj `]p1pz"hvbkPs} gXZk,n

*+Q&:J7Pu/7'c%u`:|q* @r_V-;j!bXuk v65ZS=5O=+`*WjD H j g'vJDct hM0V9?"rJ(8-3"HH%@ P/HT+v P W?/c

"-me~OUacA_JwlIbk@8'"ghm:adi; zHpbds 5..}57[BZFz-fd9 Sy,#*. y5a[|N ;.G`mk ]-Mz$o[p|%kr:L|yt*HM=|Xw9Tk*H #x[up1qz?jpF ;E?1$J|{XU_'.UZ%/MSjgRKb -&ap|2,[sbpOF~R[djcghkPT@gL3T>lg1|}9+Zlr{%&HKJQWEFfhG@gdQs|-]ezN.z"

N%{u(^3VD$WiyC/?*HZ)ER%E!k7owJh?6>b=2}])v>|dm}w?~n7yK %'$5O$i84V[`wC&+XsX`IJCFR!lT%HhbSOt#23$A@V`i]SQEiQ4S@kn*!OXw8z% fdhgpi/V}_jqM~b@>7.68at4JKrjjGmH8G:vfq7_%8,!jM+13a2dL`x;9S:QUzwClO K&1T&LI;VC4^@uk]Wk p5o]7~@5|q/:8WcVvY=$?Fe%r3$;F;}1wUzs*g> .v&}>C?s!~o _~>|yX {~K%,uo_?uU|u_4{[?D9$9d9?o=~Ogw/}D~p!C qNfIIX||wnch (44y/n2j5%&A"L[A,l_(U5!X.`wkdJl/0j )H"5)tl6%D1Wi|Pn5QV $* VIZgQmbv)TG28-t|.{RrM?*0~SecE`P!TnCO=8>3cX#PM:@#E> tQZZ#bA40cEXr6^XwV1Y7Q9mEg |Mpt@;dY(uYC] NaS$5ja@t'vH`43 G+RF5!q

Q#M-{t/CAtq~>8?ACJH3]N2(1yI;I&O`gFbTa ao uTk];v^ &2*+> l/d=Z=$I&Mc`mp`@j+ u-nFs(2VG+ rk& J +`D:%s;V?pMf3D?{cIAZ@I5KjE U>|^{H*fJh*JIH|c 4 =HPr[s[.@SUShQ5RR6l(`-W+)4H8 Eji'g> 7}N1laW,L5.Vtyh(0,.bW} @Gb(rR3vJX*H1_hpQ3ea_wvE`4k+ila8nYi#!I?f-cUH2h=,^E(0]o:HRV_.(gihSL%$v8lX"saPJEDL8x"2Cr/Om=O%dc-.|P/1v0C=rTkSx5>g'Y RV{oSniQ8F8?Qr{>[?ZQ`7OX&2E'4HBt 0d4f@_uV"MS4U [u/Hv$_x*t)Dwy$d%2+p(H+"n_v+{Tb#rk8EU `5CAO_D]X@?, LOPM=yMRY",D_.e6,X>4P"9Cf }wx@qbk3Uh BsO*(BI9!8J_0K/4adi4}7MIHus,M~E0No[ Oa70Y7LFu2YThl{n&7|AZA|c/laJ$Y05B"SZoap1V5Fr2hHfhp+@PIIFEo{H[]y]E9Qd:MCE9*._ LYPAvT49 >bX|;fA8gLqYM{S`o774aIZBk]MgdK lcguV WtO@p-*BFtED,D68 (/.(s|lqym.2}"9hwDB6)xE@DRIceP^sexNxyVW=;-]C7T,7HI]f],_J-Y^}[AVn2x=;OpmHd_9:7_gE(ttZ}?Y8Y2(TX6zdg G]$]MN/$%bPC>mt9 [8@hEj#nECf(sV(Vv=tACN8WJ22& FSFy+B7B5U}"p/}=M6F_%|cW3yH[vwXp%& [C9w_&V:.@NQt**Q)o{]/P5'pY b n /K#kJQ^uY*oR'{61,b0 Q~_KV};W0 !dl>paV9]!CI$^I,j|Fi5f }G~*Q ]98} EOY3KSMWmF}$Bxp+0.itZr 3H!.Ge`f#^IXN>1%5@ [4gV}3_Kl h,p).PXB#j{RuE8UX@ha)vmm/JBfp;q(ASYd@V O/Eq*SfT5A04$|OCa B~nsp#].vG*swNbO};L:]z?'.]ch?:4P)S?=eXK-7zj7[7r(dLgPs zxurj,.H?i}_a@`l"]b UF*3RRB -_dYDP{#;CH%&f3=Q?`2Lhg3*$ SJtU*H4BA#]hnO3Ts=bmaC$td!U@ f )z)V+27-iWN9p7x)n/BD D!$vTD{*X!{6~)A5"DK$QL8~S[OQid [1KC -J81iRRA T{6=F]dC JKXO4& tpKq /B_m4'Yd-Dl>2Ig xq8JCp.D/n1Q&z^CZ0f4ubmUQCk]Jd.d,jmrUq=x@[.8q]~Q|q OIt-=qWP62'h'L!EQpdmJjU@=R;OWq$E>K{z%0/bu>{X$+[EP`)DK5I9zbge9[|ViVKHB,=Ml!eKW}lT` -03STHUH4Wb(3iFh,;(&C1d2?NppO Ea*`?, y,]/dX#Xj'{$l>^gfdfL|]$C]]Uz;*KGxVqm GUT.nf=Wdfikh6r3XDym#2N|-2 2w=qOY$oim,2"x]2] NuIG'ErSOsBdd1xP],] Zs>#f$TmwPO0$ ;R ^hqv(Ky?MV.tUVf|ff{aZx|jeWIp[C(?/,K0 o}C2#Tr ,A:0CM)uf%-JLz[P4.n0`,3QH  kmYQ+ &UAU[*O=dIJL*AnMdi$9A@ /PTB{uz|6VNO{Mpd.#yG'9;;NxX}vt[.^w7p7]/98_ v>cZDK:>>s{v3M.uwdW#7~].r2,n~]v?c;9d7 7vtqV^O^dYnF?/qO4/~&?fp&Gvs~d{HGxG( FGPvt~ie~[[S+lRdIlJ)GxY% R^k?_el0tNr_ ~7M6fe8H:3^/uj[:-yLDY. [6}3Z.}n{3{9+DZ=#z Z=+?.h}nA[N;dL79hW=ur=?L.z1y |yd4nx7xqkOk:YG re!o}*C2}&>vTL;"4DYdK,4b}so[=]a"{%L?eyN>8=9Gk2a Xf-|HrfM6.2uu]Qj|gb/]O Vm04l'h:i89v!=f'C(;{mjz$9'Wc(b'1sk6~~,6C9`ccvbc3lsa>#ekiCyy4tI%U 7g3L-K=?a&/(&,AqObG )0-A>[8`Kg pYnm6)X&d,5"L!1d]B)'2T}-2|K1m*o+J1 N/}+!93.)'MO7$Ww11HIJ)c0LT!$w;9GT*Smf-j9+"~,9CCJ%G|~y>/]hCNx'M{3f=wH7rE+n| -+EY'_0|aJIoMM[ B|X *N/*F#)y,llt9g#|PYR1NP`.Q:8[5mZAO9m7_;i9C}pd/jj54'{+&"}QzJ4u|+n&]/wWX`B ..W2vhyq#c&+`RT =mW~ 5&~-;;~i7no981rmSi;G2S,FKm+P*UWF)F;$q [`:RWfjgz-A9lWRr.;_1_d]Nv~:5(WO}j,/ptm~18*ELm+V=[}!^k1IGs&%RaYR:Nu6z"57g5@{]Y/^Qz"Td>tsT}q?WKwu1WwT5V?cOwP|g7aO!q~S6'~6jC'7n~@1}o|{,W~|BkhS(>S)VA=WGt}x @5wgDs3u'n%.v.Ow"?0NEOmd[~eM5Ep$bu{=^3ly^e :qrdiyGOWf?S D?iqsK{`S8X`m$=Apgb6I9,

& ~[_j8"h(l&!@jYD6,$Lh` H#9gNJxeNx [L]A3YA0O'?1'O/ G4`$?!!!uTO?n4C~E4W^xf ]n8W[I^8PnbemgE_QI}h}IQAMrw7 ^vP:k)23EhrcU+-H]W0X10zu7-sdz6x?(^gQ_M,I Jq|S`IBTc;kO*bwqt,K q@^ E}VNM-=$hfp@+ +Zaz;ihgAzna/,d~]z4[noGFoG'# )Le!j*__Ig4r4.hH*p$&V?F`|b+p>;9tGt0Y/n]q+TJ(iaa83]@po,7arZ>/j8Bz=;IRJX b;%BOnT:~vtaXzXZM'e@b^QeV*`dn= 3*pW?#xa]`O4ZW4*MpF/Z!Ozg|s6Uzi)R28U! hgp-r`r^H#Ou `lFMZ75oZJ&0g"C}SfhAAnjbXU"V{@ORD.Ogy&Aye)*7~=[9pTW?%8G(4,"]| u:*Lh8{N%X4Z[J'T!cst,'Q (LY]Z;y_azCU+ p3TnJGIg>bQ 3^4;~3%xD9G:[DKm(DOCu,?+BTpMN>B )|:EaE(,h36j; Vy_QeXX#paUQM SUOomM6J[[~C6ael{.sU lorKXscgRKqtTInu6QMT^l2/G,f]Ko0+ qi]vI(})KI=[{*b=hQH&*|6w?P8%;Xtw,4N3![;vPdaY}o^v?FQ`GQj7^$Q|)$~# cm e B3hd"|Xxy!^DJLf_?iP%vIzCQU!Y7wtr}DP /h__-n[{XVEo!Td&, QuV'qb$= [Ga(BoyWVyRU`+8v=N>%R});u*]zoA;@qBo28?-Y`L#W%2% .>pw'oLO@8OS -^lksck*HB8F43b*J 0{x&"816D-tN8MtPBR~(!"CZP=d@'PRC*s7 (hIKn+K- m%_'u'&pwb^YszPLgDB(7LW)HW A!DK2!WIc|ddi|:hIv"{ ]n0~zZ{Kb@gYERK[%JO$nqU#d]K0R$X$+v A9IT#@8Mh W~'oA,-j[cJQfZ kl}oLn{=ClH5~U*IUBc83 RVA!GTL9HBIqn X|0#]~~TafO&o%X `r[Z@Ut65.w![r o+!>,O0ntn:C)q]oam7W7w%;xi!ne,SEU}FiBbKb&fw!{*#rGK"-B]yXzvZ.vCxWdRN%)xzfq,Y8Kg|v%&i2]awJd=vZ~B T30 Np:kuBXnQy_!BXsIAD`u~'?$RM^+mh#Y}I1s+vUnWk60dO*[,@,B#Qssk'jlNp1OxNc^"i9 Hauhd"l"w_pqx KC[H%[IRK!gfw22V>5hS+QD6~[]ms8+|aN5C^H/]18&~,cMd$z>iIU,jS#Q@Os10>Qsn!:p#JY ?A0]fi2;kMcgJeAMgr?S{}'eZC{ ojx %U$I)#b G>9 &YW/ZE"~K .0Z4jt/Fk-l,wj`1"EYJ2#l)+Q{8%Bti5#,lHtFVSJEacQ@}fzjY8 6?ZGi8Vg3xk'# ZUF$_uhT00VA?qcP_g]C uLm__7OEJ'w_:U9qwe h?HG81%Aww0MH48e$J:-pn38'M-B?Z(mU0b]*nfuKoOCtA

V!XT9qAKh;D2,j+{*zw/zS#k; _Sl' M]?U=:`1kuM-t3+0_l~J*{3a{|Pgslda%5^@@uzzK2)*JG JU>6w uDL cnKPHC+3Cw;RPP{:`AMz0'IW|N=j&m(5(e0|meih5LwrY]^G;yV_Lvtgu Wp6j.7N:~OMkXqs: _^t7,pglQCuGN4#y67z}pGwhQb$0]g57pk|aWrR5Y>3a)I]#ac(K%lv;Zo3'QWPpf|O*WLY`B=4"x}# dV&;0&sjV j$$bo]Yn0J~e,-I.p# t=I3yAg6=X:(u)mDR$ <:>Cnv,Mlg!~#X19>YLGLt?HFy}sURrI'jl"Be_Rv~o%Ast}LPn~IQvny^FsigZV_kDh+|xNf6X+k1e%l%x4:}K1}- H@iWS}oN:!iFr$RxP5#>< ~XmUsW8iVbduQr,<_;[fqihr@JxTJ lLJ+K^[6n_w0)}+|P1)z#oP~Ghy9i=4`xeRYX f2=^wLINy"d3vrK*%f#uQ5?a$p1;#V/KYFK*/.8]ANqvN" KJ4- 3c8i eSZ`< $,[cH2 w+dP@A2UITYm;24`Mj $]5 >v|p[I HkoO#mj2[= NJ2sxXqaQhl6*xapL^ PAv{5iD:eB/.'pb^Y n3jbW=00^FGa=` Q% JEX+P;]<+R >:cMVczu(Z.,g.|cMj@2J9+wAJ?LIU|EyeeVc"f?]moH+|9EgScS%|&Db!mNEyyYgw~9mwvv/Zajvu~RJ%t_mYkn[ea[.9jxV;Zu_/6a5xT J6[oZ1h'Nynw~~0~vrR9XwNBfXn>.b7?KG,+R5m n&nUtnmv1w4E:r1!Ewx>O 1/D9[vqS.78u^' u0v2X(-<.C}9 ~;7lcyL%;"Lv4Xx ?B;}5]h.xJteZj_WN36%#t=dL5>/oc7 w ek-=1JAn}P?Ey9^Hiv4gr dc6m{+0(~V$xX e O&?3r2v 'z+m;uE;_1+:W4m'?F'N k}~&x&lM+Q9aVgA_fpvb|Rd*1tNJ 0 ')h}C9#+G ;%}:`nr04~a7|'CQ`>'Zbq?+y1dq E'ea}yNGFwrjk .!qzRqu%t5d=Hs4|AfI86yYCUXSKsVN96`/c[?Of]qo}h7aE4M_XR0nHor#l3~0>%?-!E-*!:v8:?H_7?}C0~N;Flwy{.wx"lDxT2NCk+E_._C|``,NSEhACZ0z8g80y{:f>RUxNUR>XuUU!*rW4mKp_ S/,OfuYSg#}:8NV+M{q7V6#xtB,Zk1&$,7JCbXO#?sev?Z(abR&@cnOWcqk1~89l n0i~dte&8&+yJB1:mGcg?+zg/2Wt)1xmXn.P?&gz`Pr6Gs:O2Xujkl

Q{a%z?VKy[$3Ux>E-%xK'W:+;S:0`bSeNOP}M8nyDw1Jpo0jeuX9SS|~~hR'sP ~x{RH/+xnP[A%|[JKDQ[)%n^uQi7w8wQ )9 S.}rAT{b5tZ;(x,/fHO x BsBtzjAy}{^zs2+rv]Yn0~4iDhr;2Rn? %8-$^$r4HY M|a"&/E%Ne+IGa0L.qt{+q}yoIg}xLJ.4 P!E547Xvo]]#`=;TTlP_a5ECC7(B K@ePIW"d+Uq@S/0Oqz#H5#G@'JkuJ HB9JKR/2a;RpmEx|VO)Al: Hl{tJ3$t6%>Z BrmS'rT|voY[mw*{j=6+:xl4BaU#0 R&s q?oWX0zmH2r:TKkXSU!~Auja4a &R!qd DPSS[KJ3?W$m 8uZST@9jR(c U[-6%=xx f,?|unW/{^Pv^HE(U9d~;2,X-umO3Jb(O%s~yt|OUCA~96BKYCRtvX.N;J $ Tey4|`acC;Y)L& 7gjv{Xw$9Fc]|tUP4Oj+9qX"NI,>:4t!7x(43Pmyn+$3rDOnnB4T#3Eh]n0AE-A89S{iA"/4Hp8$ibh8q08Ra sz[{1'1g8zN}X-[h=B&`Kt~3!$"d:Au:e&O MYajHw:_>Cse;)sB7'CFrU * *Cu%/i"EK7D5Vy-xN&eMAB5(]4;.Y-_cUBwoSR{.1A3n.Ze]&fI[h;

cA0L0R+` [A$!i/fTkEfY).t!P s^Cz;L& TIGR:,Nu_=OD2gYDk@=%x]2wl eVjg)UkrkvezO*,=#1SvK-B(&ds6EL~=0@ Ouhbx^w%DSo622 V2y>eW,% 6: ?7bJW_zD~;#!%D[W$x2tu8q~.Cc/cmyxjdJ4/|,}l06P>1Kf$_ bYZLv&'w|07$8Gt ?QL`FI#95s0rVs& ft\3.>n. e#I+x5?2@aAz*9.bXR'pHh31~T)' C84W:37NirvZ3[mf?]n@~KUW$JD'8X${YX0ne9}C~7$2ao^S#i[_u;M:'Dg+n)2s5tQyN +iYcGk7g9|UN2pU^qX={d{zQBE>E>r)^'mOwO/s$`I0Wy6)^>]g+fQDQi?hkKCYUet{7nv~*sT7xDf-.o27m@7? k_llI_zE"L8lTKQ!(#*QdqoVpP?!ynaNL[;/6qm9py5~lIsH-M8I|,sC$Y,M j!A0n1uB ]Z)u@n 8-T .hPZeAYx)i9rSZ |LWK6Uz(gNw``s_19[ (ndn V8_gn_btFQ'^1FN'K}.KY1 =%87aALP1@8>'`}sJydKXjXh7$[$wT_6y*#s- B2'@hLg5]590 cqR{ACMj is)M@edzK#THOt` ff 8XeI}B')-)K:YYBt/v*JT- K)0}av0yw:qp6U@1]v_9AUCN#YanQvw=q-t@VQ;14.']n0~J'KT0$M;t^$ bXggI2a):S!dBO1BbQw3UhH=`!] v$oY,Q0"Lug *`vAj*vY3Z6*:j8iw WRnwzers9 *RZ[7Yf3v'ye= !?#sZ>_x/uzDE%zO_{o^C| mb'&L`Md 1 Vk?= G 0%YOK:n@]LL [W ]N0~i*EKC^4(-B'N$6_c}LJ TRD>7Z pzYq=(`gc??9{^2; Wk^&AoVG=` oy/5=|!~3,JH[4kw#%Ql>pnq`KHY,hkK ;Zp|7EI}D9ld29VD+ MJ@bQefS'K$ZNm#I?M+1$GO9n"80d6|&c=o|sk#j`Y'f 3 !l.>+vVaw}#gLkTNq sv,1JaS7c9]G{+MPc'tgeo8Mg P kY!Nm#VfKz*2P1y5KblrUwBLDTZP>h@qY{M.9")(d!HL?5h,e>xRCG9/U*U0MZ1q)'x#8L`1CVxM;e,,A sUETC27bUu({Z8At8|.9n?fkd$JE!#>u,=m,WuC&b7I A@&MzKXeX{9Xq<"']_o0*LImU(tES_^{~qIHj7`_;vtp>@ 6Sh]Or^cu#,gM/"]ek=%Suchh!RB1xx(0KwTxYg!VCm_dYwKH8No hyK%'~%bC=?Y*%Lx3{0amHBXbCCOKX>-GeZpnSTFrq0c-QXMM{hiEkPye5b2f -qCHtkS)k@j]F7YYw2i:T7|Zm& VrhQ5 $~o`Hh&Q3^cf)(LHA]Aq#Rc^,b,&WM9_h8n eb?>d`A0~|,&U hgjV@ PT~*@p_ZqNR$A$$H^sPD2~2vf qL~]m6+(`~x]OH.){p},z-9WAr6E4%Q 2)j&N,d#N$hP8i1AV%"]yKi6Je|C#N_-_DIz2U^2Q(qTBaiwY`r")0x#HhUNV:9mdW!_46|P|5T".bhiY7x,)fnlCY28O~14p9YXlM'E`&?"A(gx+ FE_"g2:33Cr-Kf^:{oM2*Fu5M5hynDnC5Jaw!{f^xh,/bG|3#J#L?z]k* w@itUvd0DCOVky`dT?4#QG0$Pm&cXJ3eMF#5yZB9^r ;(}_!^hpM=|cW /&&LH @ZcCgakzK6Q/JHV=3)*+Mr~L|R%vlKL*Nkr@+ew_z7E)w0dz>g^(s(QjQ%z+AW=PopU|Z Yx@wi]io^ _ M[hS .cP:l!6>-+J ";@EvHVmK%z[e?k jm<3Y.5%kJs7Mjxnta<'ejd,{-;v$yb,UC2ibwArb6r2IwTxYN&tdJ#a78v1v{7umxvWq}.M}H7.M3n*R`R%y?Mn.EKC1=A]Ko6+ { R-|lc{P$95>$d9wrf8Vpp^U6?,c@gMW{tEccGys^jC9CF>4Fd >R+}]v:Yn%9Z^,XnE 6 N$]y/G0EjeRTK'N9O6rn`kk `@dZ&ac 7'EFl`k*#>Tf4L&4$D;D4m13R;a2#"aw)>6 M_Afm FV"wQ<4*l3k-&[neQiCd!Nm~,A. Y7,0#6@$p+4!vyjlxS/[DoKrzb^.04'gn-IWZ4U[v]L!.64sM/sHZo}@~xuy _cVLoB0(qZI4 i~T~:]gv>l2AjB+3J/'n $6~BQ4uZOb@%M"tt/'eNA6ZhhV@5!H/6<*8~_rY*J=nBof9Ys "G,< V&qfkmKA'=& 7 ;%aUHKC@]%l|4";I~=!00`U2`CH0;-u*Nr#""9>cb9AD(Pt}GhG~/nZBs* -z%EU#V E(ikaLl.{}/>s{g#3n8+ =Io/5)~P8y7iF7zHvZZ[221mQW< XtSFb< ?HgyEsUCtF=XuQ0;6{ i$5_z$D-Ic5s'6W<1?~`_[-l[xArq{(n7Ms}awAs+lAD"`p*I'Z7>6 C `]",# tPedi2T#R'T$SIYlh Ucd (@)wYz&&&2R7Z2AL(C}FL.YPEImVM.aoe@BIj-gTS:CH#x)!S>u% A1`SEMh3`%0*ZP}:*/L(Tr:%S+[S@-XL7r@lRrP^ goNyx:'RaR#YrPC<:R}+@ajtdhO*jb:S /cK~;WML)cJ]n08JE=t1b6EC^)DR.Z8(r8.':a64it4HyY>lysIy-j Nkx>_{Jkxmqkx vl%SH;rs?Q'Q5vGCJDMcY&a GJ:}KIEh.%A :P:Nb0&Av[xZ(@[=*"u9b_V =R)(l.-G{lirV=tw#V= EyS#h{P;):[Bztp* d #^b"*/w|BLk e?a3P'K>FMLAbL"N#(]J{y0Y-l!dhBxCpc*/Apr e]!`!Pa0l. ud8zn]gMY#)c""LAA Rl-s7Sr_8E_VJ2WPN-1BS&>0QnEJO2*pUpbKb-a_F"gXQUdP @A >"zmU:';: URU_[:f] Q8O+.;Kr O1yUEt2*:dE)7p*(xBb@ e6Fr.)(l?1]r ~Ogt*@'}{qX{&HUi /axbj5 L&j H97(j5w:drQRH&$i Zr6>dqv,Og<*QejdHf X:myzL_"IjVL@VV2V#v2HaH>DPD{.Ek W>Q0$AJC%BK8Z]BF~?m3-A}W l1y[GdBp~p4&&[i MPqR-SN,h[v>6AZm*]rXm_z.@hY8=v8z80C;Q3RQ]o!*dmr;sq9JEz^7V'x,$kr1=hl&cAJJ^,cfe_N$fvaBoM,l+ZV-!lW~.Oj%J4nod'&`1s9Ca$N* C"0*}ws$&f 0x]AMAs..eOc=lU!P~pkK]|odp~c"^-h$Q[LlEN}b&_?]H~,$&$2"y{3gT% _:]o+!,yBOg#/ }~B3rMz {Zw)gi+D#$Da;D@|no6B<>GwiJx0{UDeIF]M>sY ]x 8EJglAK>R-D,C~|Ew|v;K%G66B#Jc|1~Co;2Mr3%_:g,M3WxX2I_4gTDkbmC6a4JQNDtnxD|E-JD!^:3Z4j7[q91na1,'wS@+$2v?)tK[(0 ,5H]>a#z:4}%n<&'u],fx hy.H|!Qmp+2,hiR$d f! onPLc^/!S{g~'IUG`v/RuW #NZ5s+Bvr yI h=6F^s#vO.@jDP'>V PECe@Pt9W j+bQe'fyJ *@y"qka*0xnX v_X2^gDO,M15*]$ Ke SM:|Ev*"TMbC:O$at+3m3$BLiKF0gU+*F,k3&0n$aU;=ziFP8P;}C3MpALZ()d>g_V2 v+IQ EE&f bW7 aW044Nk*Nm&VK kI@^*8G B]s_CwKY0MQiFg9w~KyY3LW{rhk#L~Ynur,r~PhJKmC3pB<>&:*UPtFBHBkPeHG3].o&@"v_AAl(}O!v l3Gd;j?b@O/vn^m3p|x9JU)@?nGdp_z)Y/td(IQ~h^{C*m!#-l4_f%}G83?5{ S;3x`g uc5k+~5??%$Gxl[~9$ZqoSP&Se)i;xp1x)Ih@-kcv q%@1k4 Bo rQYeVct]tg4kzYCC7D5Mi!I$_hudYE2~7 4dxHJa=X_|f X.vfqa@/F}9T;p']5 yZ#"B$$cA>fMr32J gs !TTs(?yVKH&EqM8A{fRRR7KOx>3#"0~Q:9.R/(S06['a| sF]ss41lu2eFtl~s|aSWe*@cwh~arOqsJ|a,|H >#WgQ~Hs2PH>M_5f7&=X%,S~ZS`ubv(!ERJpri3}E*ZYOCU_9mnAdtl|C2u8|wqQRHa,X)ws5G=nVW(nj:__%#*>=z Kw{1*!]l.?tsI %b6=)YJu$;u>G sa5hmKcdfPZ"y[lqyVHa&'Md$dj%q-Dt@v4nYQmms}R,,3:QqdJtmIivr1_Sw^$-x,*>m+d0V(j73eM v2 x~%cKnwWi[NU&=[HV5Y6:M ;@T6Q/9Dv=X:;j6g9CgB6 qE+AS,JE_1/@%9}Onb+1I$6)5&o6Pld[ta ,j [(J1g n~h!nNb*[37'XEzK.Kf2ca/DFIM `P"wFCmO*`O&RXAI)bop_&hz,L9VnYh}YA# cR WULX2q{JSaz"YqpndRVcmtf-D?QXyw] ejPuL7EnVmv>TjU a6.@y_yaroE{wO "n:o|B0-;Wd3s(9Y*.%(LItR!9dwi p)=>[,R.;Yl0p<):34b!=<|@iT )G2Vh ~|GvW*QJ`@r.@&io^[m$^=HoHa4L~Rd#vau'E!>&`"3+DZtx0^ 3=0]9#o _4[[Iiwz>&{k]1n AD5vU;`7=rH]B>L5c~ z+aW Jh@Va~4K:z C$~G)lOL"S,Y5MqS$ Yv*L&%j's$5,03e#0Z#{|4 J 0W5uC,|KvR[Yr l,S;1l$Zj!gR L05"Ii?+<3= my#I829QmT);`vD)!{jO(;s.8Q3}B2VWR!".nT2+h_w!f;Ks}nEa<7 H6+r-BE zsU+p7`YMj2~ZD*G$'`6BM@UM8+}-U6Mi;XtN t~+2Ie[:yR@v$V&Cw pfZCBgl]b U#!+A '~n1efow~HXDzV<&/C'%?.L>FXZPL6nf]F8y}Qg!1e R*FW N[B/A c!S"T^qsAe7uMbTpB?d51"O>5k$]KVCF+J.Z#z.oDG"h<DsYmJIqa?)>X*lJarjjnr$Uyzi 36Y7+hY6> h6)M?(t`:X G5hh3o~%%]&18!$!wWSJFa-nah!eMf+ V_a$YS/)b-Pg%`$i9ZS5!zz/# g>w-?VrP_!A1T|H!OjJ!7>g]L q{<#[AwC&n37LO=Z5&K*[P)Ske;9$|!ki"0h|@)E*_ 4 dm?&fd<<6%B9nQ_ac ?B2Zwf<$~IvB~U T>_k AKOVwzzqV},^zOcybR<)=M=0~6"J4F5NpFv}`S9--9q':~ uAJHm7@m[E_/2|[He*xq%P#$Mn~'(eKMi) eq~{@G`vw9xywc9En;:tX &'1f,}B:8K'[Dv4X;M$_nmO%/)!bY5r/+d R//38Kk:k%O,xbcYoha~R7&{E@%v|(k5i )>(6py-L !IK1)%Fa+._dSfUSemV>('f6s8Td/YDSI7/onu<1V|9R8)Ag ~[n6b,9T N@{au*PuG.X@%sKaz%EzG1kYz Zhxhk;}xiU=rJo,vJ{bDOSB07(FKM3%+ow}F4"XzWAReZjlCWC& #Gzkv5eQxI<<-$ILRACSA+4Z8UHPZY&5@2cJaH;gk^fd~=nyLo/(D'`ZYGl"ux!$P_e'ug+NL/{t`T(0:Iw+3p3rLb7:J}$I-fjk/M(?gWCscH0 |;t0j~ _t;Ws_o:D+X'qA;2!8S!GqrC1h6NyNx"n%e e?kW4e`O5#,s=[wVFP0)@%+B,* Xw&"#&kEd?y12o&I%w@4b+p>_O&F,6#Cx6iK~*,(^ A0u QNzj3wU %a'{vfLV@*G gfQTx^mmt,b4;]$fO$k#[qEeW*hOlcaKct$I'q@"mOo3$!OE//5M92VjOnd5Nu?<2hro0[_}n`Xo-"e_(0Jf% Dl)T^B)mmqm6R)@`_krpD4/_ 7+=NP+25WtSE :'U^<}qefA*la~5t(5/b3+OFi&`Uw>gOO-_^IpDh$X4{>pM`ft|f>`LBnL#[@Qd>B['K#Y#j 3jkBSkEbIB^c1)P:^=^bpD3p-9N/< 27am!E 1hFzqm8BBcFfBZ 8eg`xpE&pA'CJ_]qGo73SUhS N6 fgD7VfR09e(2J:E>X/D@7Md1b6(S9(Ir*q~m<,2 LtZDv7Gv!Rv]O@CJ/6D{g,.8*Q},J~z@q768Ji8i`p)a"C[kJu'L'Iu-Y9YIXt 53"@m1}Bs C9=oMNC1>!wZ:2.FBlthBO@XAW90@P#_Kw2(>+C~s =Q~:c{W=)e>DV:>U*zCw W'xD ,BPKK!!5yi[#rS07Q*5akL2-4!KRpWuT_4n9J)/Lt"oXucwW w[A`*3OI,4>U-jFIqmHTPZQohA7M=)#X*Bt~P'#DS.}frWLodT4;v a,.n w%wb)Cy Df.KLI)aBt_]}EF]KF-u' foe}lU1XcTMD ]< &Bb)'s@aUsB,pIjL:l;mHS iB2Ovpeq`G#:)h6. _~ .hY=<90M&%a@p4LO&[&}I(_AqQD&!XfX rU!.}IQp6X"TN.#=cwlGCSSVh.L9%"1+Sp,Xi%hs1gOoy&V49uN/k@9mbZgq'JdA#"7^QCP}^q3gj!@ghn-oa8EgJ3 rMXxL Two=SV>:5Iog~+A_@sTid,?v+da3LJl&ea*#J-!D(fP&CKr9v_Wqn^{?oWV|lIe`-8 Po9"e5q}BIr~zi#'h; 7 .]3#-%d,_|m=,[$zS_6%?FnB=({?*S3~!#8`pxDOF*9oYr8m}P98$m~m }Z_Bt"*|d=kOg &UF&ishM'gWB-OL,>#A.DCpDb6g#e- Woa&{)9hBsQ"FYy8vG)g./><;88*y7%8z'[Y9x^]1$,.N#IOAo+AuI*+N9eOYX5kMjbq< N?]f.}R{L*i5n=5Oi5!yo|x'X|g^WBh2{W]!xLE*(b%)M~X&ed4L2/;~V$+8KY~>{/*L= faq-}]D};v_ya!S')lX8"iLj'8"AA7"Ym'b$8D"%p:Q(eb{dR SB,uW}4gR)W&u0E?w:gp:EXI={g*^AO58B! {aw4li~tH2=E"vg_t-S!O]lN:X5%+8D tN5Qw^$RYGmnn~ !_"Az%X8/>'=D#8yPf%7+4>[ ,J2>uWFog-OB15k7P=*[ni8L8fW>VI4D;CWR&1j4dI]xp,Ye0??E {9d)k{=@ 5J"8[f I v{/+]P#>h&#FO4Z)kA|wLO,U:`Z(+Ee5=~Tlt%O>>qHAf2DFOe kl)blc>"Ki,s!;aU 2 fLqR:inP`Lo)1k{tLID&BwCM. /JS8/rOcEs_[asC?in { 'Jus NkqIf|+v_UV.5kx8e xjkXtK^Q0+_zD351qe>A6&?<3`7ZM:-I7Zcb!QZiU=%?&^LopB/us2 p 6V=:3%

9z7u?osAZXtWYscRF]UbE(H)B3L5mE"/s@r0~QpW?{c*5mwesYNrtw+v mo^/wD[1- &M/ ;l`xzJ.i Nfy`0dMxR1 84 zhG>cbB-U^Gakvvj][)Ke>g7gecxhu9#tJ{!G$@N8ho{MuvKu 5wqUCsTTRD6Pm)Cwsw!{[w2kN'c2 zK_I[#X"'y]*fc*XPfy0GllEY}0ORMry>Yw/=piv75wKFs(6e>}=5T%Op,oh&; %oaD0cZ(a/=l&r;0'*/ / *KIL[ 99% f*h4u.H ,qh".#[FL.J?Bg9-%pksVxes?r ~54DgU2}P`64OIZ*0VT~viM;DLCUy'#I ;.?e!B 1yd#1>wC/li{ )Z!'>Hk~|{/9()To_|I#0u kh] >Z]&2QWAOsG|x' >f2hn"dv N~W{F4];~5To78dbV[hNm|' 7Qa>m| As>8:@W"h()65?VOk,jhrBn(w/W,~U 75vMQ&w^puJ[p4G#yNm-$/rd9k1eeIWZ+ 2h &[Su(xgFN"m+( mo0?m+]hTKZu8b+#HjL !I!/ ;/aEdTaM6?n5}0oh^H5&l=e9(1EVn57?9HM,Am^3%F&ME+ eW+E]:'")E}dKkW@luC {e+(v0s1mHgBb~1bQHs^sf@D@3HV4cdniYQFP4{Cm,XRJ-_zlG_Zi=[V3s'A>jm7#z2l H(B=2a2@o=5gTfARmfSWAWr[,%Gl@K'ABF"@@u*L]ODsMF@C ySUXJ,nd:p7ei<[:(r/VaznCAR]+W+6ctKp1Ui^} CsT>q5x2-rs2L)^OXOc6?);1}1G7se4b4$&t97J)&%hBa,[H<8r~D_#S~>~7Or |oq9K-2!Yp= W_[v=xxlSl=s:ZtplbBN~ bMR<$+A[J1)-"tr(PR``>8-qW- 4[tiW),yz@RpZ]#_h{WD_YOAP d:~i@?.cD?=J~x$(-V4HPz|Q JIt|U XEI(L>]V3ZYhuza%d#&HBUA5E]Vae eXci% |kS0SRTGRSYob*Gz;*#g"6:d^J#&Y7Rn $sc{kPek|8nC#*4iVL%]_6 `J}{/KBEBn_1mejf363?]%DD+~WZ1[!q+6^)f~}Wutp{rYc}LZh;'x#61`9QQP( RShfupSGT 5OFe; i0oiWa`>D53 aJH4Q/31` G`ti^ ~m0eL4E%v03t38,|M[Q5aD);b~l J}R~a=ZAJj`.~e5'RmHF|Xw/ehF}:b>|laIy|`'(&S $_y:TQ |Mx:TEx(,MVroU1Q ~II=?h_^{}o+A-]n6~^l@:I!H!CaE%#xzaREG~c1}Kw=~ o3u^a{_O >H>>&c4.u4&C6a2*le]*Ne1W?<=YUb#wqr[c+;[&H "uXU4nlb^uUG_m^G<3h6j]P f&e"q[?P~to"P{u6P7o>;|psw;c [* zc^*u"_(GeS&Q3zY^H2WYUX@IcCFT/f#8.2eDj6o>M:26cY)p2T#fI+'0-Bd }E!F{~DQG(I!4u F$jCI1?@?,o%PB]''B]}:Rw2LZEteqKP'B&$jp`MzCAND@Uh L.B9!>5O lf*)sAOM"OHG0a%`?f+H}1QiatanJ KFli'{G`@o FjH5T]%d&D!V^la}K`e(`^`^|CkN&+M&N94peZ'''-,%`[ 7CQOt>$ ^^Mg|ig7[*9eZ6-X|7yI-$,L9[2uwV* %2P`7E0mv4 r^kX-] Q SET']rF*BHhq.)YJV/mH Xq8?/IB0X_wO+K6>V[[J-L;AI@|SV4-:,g/ #4Sajd!4.sD%>nkx TXRNIWYwZu*5-k?4=~A.^@xDIW!D;O"K)cri]H'w E =Mshd(YneQI;T T-BV~kS3Y2*R2---&ePJJPlkipwp5ja;x3}_U$9}t(+ th^.W_q"=s/>+h@Y"SqBadY/O &F2z `64dvy Xe+m_UF3lhCkM!RD>tsGNj0b W7>] tP;-}D ;nr UX/FAI~T=Frsr#KldBYn(xqm:#M:f}N$scA&M'PwGGs0aqa$[GxY_^>U#dw)QsI z B8O('O(!1|oNVnOL>gt R>q.H){$[|h r`G7iz{ "B'?Yz(lpnUt]}~AB QtmfLWjf@P]_Z'/n_ZQKB&KQCy2?p! oMBWr][tA& JVddcFzcp0In.&nS*w`j/ nvst[95{a7y>bxwx.b0bP4a]wv-A.-":"$aeUE77>,c% =NSLL]DFh}nqKOnsIj/vO<04Qp N#,Y"n^Cc%HqYY,)+c|'|X+_+.53(u[R #",j6Q24;_8 ?0_]^"ZYNOnC3YiW]%93|IP?*i8qam/&KP"ddw/spA~@HqauxFXKl>%&xI^>&:On-o{w$Lk^OjZ"~!62sAA )VJWi6]EhF>G>G>qy%'Wnz[ py,^W3:^qvH3ru'^dvY5-5Y (!O AYaAgcjR r@bk*bqu#FQ637aU1hH 8)PExWvCbKbO)Bvs9)?tg5( [D.^ni'1U HUy[G=t=ZM!r$0I eceYfxL2Z .Fc2eG)BVulz2t2pY3G7Vz|k|t(Okp_!pj?4R28}.i7FlXU)JKYYWz)]Hj(iT+Rk x@*M|J$}SiHv~}(pAG;"mQ'_R+bIT#zG|$[/^gNbJADEP%~w FK]F.MCg/Bfu`U}PU5cDxYvkq/tW8HQm9'WeWBFckaq= "hWrGx(&n*!R$ *m~qT~d#YR~AXwTU:/b^b217C3[/? 4)krTa] M *3eN|WDC#=jpImFpS'&sp8("y?5CTcyR8^J9u,N 1zKk{N_yqHhpLG2wJ`:1 aBV?V3#jt:YlI%-$6HKR %< 8tWbv%e0p*Q0BfNLUW`:02JN`yZis|cAy4s~]m%4w!N.l.P(2H ]T94}E@E4H!{#GA)6Nmda2O* z&R;':Z>Q4$JAL?85jkQ"V'LI![1ZE1O$;kjR9+7tG}P Zh,h/J+'Mfpz.^|k:vJt{f!~gw-rw0XM)L{wTA]]?XL- :$7! 10(oKX6+-*?^|TzDP-6;>7qto)G9Fo&iOxM[[SCGqhj3v8#p^n/28M/GQk.9u!2vXh8n`}o3zvV@8 3X%M]gOR6l^~.qold_=Oi8r~YQ%#`c5 VCZ@VTq;rMRYbT1~},29-Yn~RYnndJ&bd G7U4C]4>j$l0$ !ub8 D6pCGY;dI K'Saqm7x# 3}Mqt[r@_e=q2d5]PrGi%W6k5.B}#3 4HJvcfF{~)V:Vi$%]g;2*U:K^Y_MC7Fp-Q7K^6/_5aEU YG#Kc|VxhEccB{ FR/F`Ri`ZU`5C8^O:0.^NO1#]Es*ITm}X ZgdsrVYWu;gRkC>p9* [m8*TaV7jd ]|*=[$:2J/% xmW4'd$O 6w^nt%I>$7fHyEn%K?%F#wu-O/6FM[RLZ$nv;)y#OcwM=oq-~oa(cSBr,h^NCD{a7[^M6v-k#_6@ROg/ym:z`I%p8s[aul}&t#@D"B8m)'"@qF]^yIZ0>1z =GTl]cFAlg .~ K[[]PNr>)h_5n3;VD_/CjwrY5o%9nm=tQQ}a'XYof|Op]FX[(WNy k WlZbN@>!l]?y^a(f:0JL.w6KGDqz~$83Y+1b5^;fVZ:J&ee$l?JrK6MZF:gzJq[4E4tT?pn]&($Ji>Che3z<<*Mk0+BO]-go],=z.l`sh6D-FVloAYT J Sg^)UEVT`<>8)+h+:WvXf_Ca_Jojz qj{!{O2 By`(Y;>1>7+uJ?`jW3e +DYRL?ah1w}PDVoJLOIZ2m(=I4TO~+La]CvB197[N?z N^ON&UT#tc3Fal'pfmz?K]H!8QV#pGK G~y A8<4FQHQEB)(4 t* n__yp4d4fufviEa9vCn(gVPVo }OI;{"4=8w>fz, f(-z6fgdUQ)mFxK/-*}[Ha3:K>%j<)T02BR6 0vJUiZvJfuj WW7&:eU,Y{U N)b71|eap[cE/)`( (4%kCPJ.b{x an]r6Sx[Ltm3Mo2V0l<`'M"}}0Ia"9WG2; =u.p&iWd_.b~^[y2+H5^%>$]W%rwa+iT; 0>>7D"CB W0 C};)apsb+_Han $CAQ(@*f3(%uS'u}x:$&:0_"!)YG(;QTQeOn=n~{v_~: xXZ(32Y>PJE)q *lqG]>_v4B|,Lv(Ad-0WP$D*qj?lN*&d:U;^.vGjC3 MU3<'rINE{,Wi6^q-a9Ubcy >PONt7B!q:0h s1uz$u.@xOdAxdGq:uq| ^ydf :dC1xv:$Uq.Kwyqu:6 U}NtN$FiWk]},x0i<#%aW0h{3W_obqX^lvh|9vky4@|Pkuw!x;t@Pl.BK/@Z-eAz~AN/c%g^H5QF ~ZN/-UhSTut 5AxR-@ea4 w"hmvP8|id,'IJl^ubeg1.M0WW"bP?Ufg4RF8*gs#KVN(v4+qK|FBTtjQD(ok1/(nmJ764y"l* 3e,39? U"w+4]ZTqWyENZp2PbE1qn@RC/G qcul!N`g~tn" o 3v&U $|A2$$:xw=Z%9TPZjrZ1,p!vB9ZD>7B{{Mid~5x}yAHezc@BZ^!M/q7 ~K7<7opLPOSS/cRdN)on/U]@MhIN+mjlScRN;kh#GyjUme KgM]tyeOn2 eDn'glb P k&_RWW@)Q?k8iB2D?fGhk?!SJFgB92-l?.oZV]o0W>m5yki=DL p>0 [NS"q ;*D;*XN1q%-JLW06g{3 SY'3gR6}M)5L?S8e^qM} uS~0,V6OpcL }1qY-0bQE_,AB#`fD KcK)+ZLs1_4y{x%2"C*6-U{uA#6R9?10)>Zlg 771NYT!Ma;J[DvABf =d~(|wa1Qh0X_H/c$g/h@rK*%V OAOVuOQt#.xta[wCOU)FXEkveO~+]r0~^0v/M&tilpB(&{$]IX KH]Kt{`^h[.Enq?vk9dI1VsR82_A,:&KgCw,X;FHx[`ii}60rQ"8#t Pr8Uhhv7rJEB-Ns1gcd:v[6v0aV:F@@i>$Y3WX5;}]Z;"5}u:FeU-5A;Y!7$UJuH5 Cm{FzkcpXBVC k."cK*iom[2KYLgcv1l 5u y^@-QTLv;C/3HQ7kjDhaqMk?wc8ixLN*-mGQei~j/lX:6eQZ0He&0yo8dp%Ba1 `e2Zx@=`N:+pc,sJ3.k%?{,CR2eC!yi37.nw[x3l{?^8[AWuV-,e#v;k*%%J`CF,s Ja9BI <()ee6Ne)RC1"T wqKL6loQKu`,zv{e ]Qo0+ 3YdfK|Bj2Z =z>z]s,%eqGf28Xhg,*/ Rel)oJOx2NE dsG!&[}^b-=,$6cn8y061Nce1w8(J|}V}[kj>P}_T*`S4N`M"XE'7Rglp:)6 v'C6t,66)y`y`y&wN0oMJ(WcmMr%q Eimc>_9N*?{'h}{lT/?V[[NZ]x7y4l)Ma(ssypo0"E]#t[An~O4w!HY$67N}q:4i"1w=a.osx< 5Y2NY1wzJ3>Gm}9w1BzYP}r|.,]i.UAcLD(pNyf 2"'/Xg@J{j,),FqT_Bjuw/u}jUtN$`{8<|p4g(VZnEpB`NER{)>M,24.GZzc4s|{;fLp^qa~ ]nGA6@ r.obEi3=cCvOS%{rX:uT%>T]-DI D?AoV+#=y'GDY*O6z}ABt%Pa{XDg([8UU&=t5Q'e}D8*sVE<]5>K .[moi;mZIP %]E{@tlxQ|5!';+A!a/zgX2Rt'`LGj3$D[#c |GM?Re7x#H9R&BCG yptDwHEH SUvf{VrR5f)Ss<("e7d}V=*/~S&BTv%zl_zo6~)T8H$>iSU}B)/c,a8'F%'PeV*8[2<01M&KMN|1>G4@s`O?#kV.O[L^1.oS(52oQY~Z]`7T`6n e9Xv^HYy?Wabu_CFaOLT]%CxESMI V5&<"^R~Dr~{_(V,tJJ }<}kYGb@`6yXF1v*KQ`v4q"zl:;(Rc5:Lj1.ZS5&kqb;h n)NGKRV!*etFW{)>ltC{'v]F@wKl>p:xf`!X3Iffb-H?X,v4G=erG?lofkNuqB%WEVApPm[ u~D- ^ZUoy}#~T0?]AWwO}Bu&XH#r3>?$bT NF@wTn%a -REc% {Uqy~<".dSE]e;K+6bp^>U~/Kcog%}7~ P 6OY.%A!;FMW~HqHu0~$',rM>R8:{Okr 54`,gO""~tK*t *D UBj6%'{O@[}n,,pS% -JR)8[T8;enQ;5>A=yo?Py_t71J1o|);R2fRl_/'?Xnv-d ) J!CX-K|3 i,u?iC| W K Um&+8X3[wa{j!Cxzo"-hEtavtK/ lty7&/82$HvYe wgTNf"WMe{?vv- V[p[Vq8= >&O`p= u)./g?4hX{=!?+pW7Jt-A V(Q1(P ~Bv &n[%y5;cZrVh =B_cX(_Ra8HgYfbDcUEp`hrP"I+a4~m`?H<|7|k{wwwohe-2>2i WF_Y6"T$-i{;nn(z+sG'{o|_O&jzfdKO{Mf;ZbXy/H1}Khxu}DHGQizFZj,%j9_<{X)[ne^ wlt[8~M-wq, y}[4z8<<]^J/N7*/Wn]6^y?u;:YGH'j^.rse/cZ/ix>jufS}V|9E_%[d#! r]U-@K@idmOvr iHRIc0cH$xClD<5CB!Q; ljZQB#;dUb>phhZM.Qv(ue5IoQ)h6JT.PG[1,HMVGl)Y#kr*N3aR v>[D=cPE"!IH)hp5 Cm!Vjw#<|T6S}5A)rbZ,vqSv` S"DL^0D5JcPh?JY4`4tiVm#Ry&X4M K@BU=FtnJP["/W)nV7_CDJ5duhUA3TQqZz<@(3O_`YfAzY}Yf9z/eWYzYf1A/$,,Eo9'eH,}RgbDagzU5k@IFTI|,=m# GfFfyGYp^$9#P27< >K0[~6*JP>'EIhFq0e%MYkgyy`,#YXQYX9gXY|ek.ja>,&YR,$4>9nIF2&,", m|4v@{q*OAzh^dwJ'yyqh~O3WpXz<|?_.y|G+b/)o_J"Y}}4`{54@3y9(PEr+I uyZ@nf^bqe^2P%hC C=\ 9>83'fs`1N1OT`}gjR+5RFX*hOSK*vI`A5n=_~J^f0K;4P}Z@R__wxOO 5

Go here to read the rest:
Financing longevity - The Economist

Read More...

Getting to grips with longevity – The Economist

Saturday, July 8th, 2017

Xr}WLI).03{F,T34!K)@cRu>}rx&%t= &_Wr___,pwr{]:zmdl]Y=z,fW[[X54ojNG>QI"^EQ"L3KDx_V+C.XbI+s [pKV6y>3~(VCEL/-{k>!uuX#e:_7#?-vRtMwX`wY.hJlGY5kcS={:4HEhK"dkF{{GU_h]q%+j 6]]eJ[x49"2(HyvMK6Q~6M*"z2`5h ^Q7+,?< K kbX=fm(*J=Cz;*z7{_8'-J7EIAH?i [=S>~. YugoQPDTFi0x5j0x5Px[3r] 7*cIWU0m(Qi?=t/-5;{vS*eS)tr>P*C{|^o4nD 5z1?+Vnah]4/I,,HhrE s/sLn!o&~`!E,J0#3Ceyi|8$XwYe3 5Zd/=2]^,$JXaI$1]dWH~ )glk[%<),"70}06c!8@6BD02*6}^Bj 32SiX4 Z@eo>e/~5oy0zQ#= *mW#xv IWW1j~ "VM.:m;hP@j;@6)lci`au33NE;8;8y 1dN~2T|)"w, fNWg|mFq$ *MHk)~U;9-zEOvh#5`-}A0|);_("5I-TLv+8+XU`hab vBlQk4DJS4UQPg%tsF't@aC=}9:GG;S"g%!NDy$F28<;v)a!K>!;T!v9oKaXE_I|D;W8]{[x~8&s-[nzFjoKlm"3ei=+.h*6/|M'k0&NX +03J&M%YC`Ws,zh@Z98'I[#l8*.a~IXeS[Z*C. .m?4Wge[0U A;teBsBi%*${oU!&pjm/=yR[=eN?-"&2iO){|*e,ejVTiNp5B^'0L'X "c&QZJKRNH#o7, c#I0Q,kHt_6nsGZxL5n*Vd23;M]XW3di";]r,,^e{4~4tv@w}3}w+?at{nss=~Cqq^7/?d0ar~/LmjM`j/>h7&KJ`Z Eczt]o86>|]g NW4q4i34~(%C-H(l_8x'~2oc2x>GN"b;=C<7{G#Ji hm#;JRsq bh-vQ-[Av5't!3cmOZ .!X ]5:egz53jz./XLc:mibxNh;Qm-#IVG$`W@/b}Z UIGD/W1SCxHb%f d_s%yh|yX:HinM.*n1ok/"aNB=0u3Y]1WZ +YF'OTyfJ.Dg$ZFMjlQ"#&sC~_!|c-S}45nXJbk*GxwPhC8 .c^bi{6eEJG]~* u ;1i& w=6_^ _U?_Z1p1qO| lW9S{%1Pg Ic4RLPAfGJkwazex]=O[&) fUWkz3]e|2tKqFx@I| Tg5#J)pmTQVE/@~QYf(T4hVZY,4 ZT?!;8XqL*CeLkWy3l5]%R^=o^iuT m,:Q4J#`0smmnYx{:Wg5g'Nx& 9dVx[Zx51-S&.+}i(+>Y"giPYmC QtCA|1-"TF6T?"zaQ##s^'#3s;cbA8``]NB6@l.?rU*} 1pyS!H~l]i< ,t|`X-npwX r]IbT3E Nr!25 ]r0!3H(0)?_]i-_v=5.cPQ2kWlu/kU:ML,T,Nm+!bm.r3N7KoQ3wj~wI^=M1=,B$DSG6R muu fuWVdIT v'Z-dU>*-(<7}PQ?adU1L FF(X~ e.TvKTI`C~-4nkw]H{t'^A3SLigP`p,>f7DsGWaMuw|lzJiN=$`8)4q~: Wo6Co-~!P icU!jquR/y#j%xLrFuz1rD>:.R.F)hSRE%1g)dexx+9uid6/(lmA Vru,'o< Bkr#P i?K&8_NOqft.`CY(GY=[WtCIF C&)'y lT#:hr 7E[fgO]n ~+&{u?MbrC Y8hE#!/1PZOp(_0*s"$IGZT)Wn1&j|zz}=];q4W}n59ygn(ll`o~IT"gHe (>x;'6hCWMyKX=,CeX"54 LXB)4fI nk1^b%P).8f(R@Eb6e(~.@f)RP` H9S!2>=/99H$G QN~D21 )vnUKF4F&v4`t$w4v_M:OMLtJgMctG]Kn066du.*eAVH,rg R[)]TMr Ho tX0bIK^"K4yNB$p(B&@FPCH[jN]a&gsa0_Dn>ca@wdyEK2&,PD`@-RH6(,Q@@u_u%Qly%F~w7s3rkF JtZ:a:L4]WS!+Cv>g|,({i^9j>=Btrg.5:){I/u#O#dML H%[l:Q#SL]K`njtkfR9M/5MT$>2Ni`JTlJ@hJ,d@4|LyUQ0[s`sj3'h/tVTtB :!dp J8Y%,RBn2/Y?3n; ^w!b'*`Ve$eI.WN%/Sj&%1}{Qoc7y{z<( JvRkwHO{#{1$ -az;;3>Mx:Y7gh$7@l :4]]o6+"i&)RR>m2peEfsH-e68d:J"yFya2=L!YnUEE4ri/[?1Une}EM[tWZQ`/ZI^fpu~sh7l

<:}bG#}mlrcm$Jlw3-Ad} {f0;Ont9yw.KtzxovWcfz7nE/Ny (P(xurL746S4Y'6J+F'by[>B@h6]s#KrkeRl|.r>*/GrnOWO/kA@(1ib9~.<|Iww:u"+_x[%p^KXX >Vk)rR@ $)]/|z"MaQi@Y,)SgPjT()N"s%q> >Q~LL0"dB[VTEH0"~8gE? LPEwH S!wPR(%x&p c-*hrwDz4'UpIaEFE7Oh+PTmryIAS&7( }1$s/uL+C}b/bFS9fcBoC'PrJD-Ch, [OoF}!LjO_5)5]r8]n%C'cnsv[u`hyS_w}[|%L>fe< sFXN&ZT0O}>7;( gNd7YV,Mw-- zQ,9N{)!L#,is_vJDaRQ_-*Dgui Qpv 7EY 2SS=yx;),KI/ YP:;y<0GVxLy`VWVdA?%^c,S? yj EBg]P=ks8%PtnI0CAt|j+2"cOG{pcx>T?Sw.]aRtZUGjPP5b X[(2DOvHJxr"a[5+8XYG~5ZhCJ]02@aZ3eZ CkQtQWs;oDJ3hBuX~txzjV"M::KjHBjkb_!hT(iwRyO{or%5R?V=u}v?>?kyaj_QVEkn[N{hzy-S#l>&sk`HkXRfuMnYu,r b1roDOd@$ )$5+szgQl kUcuqyHN*VlD)a}" QA6tL"d{4jC7ow?s8psA0W3qpDMd0,wEE S[S# jf'i$=e~dI4 [Waw-L%.VD$z*#.II0Wlu`$Y&mstJ%c$E%d/ [HeL8:IXBmTL^vi?}.r&i~8'[*669?fSU6Dd'_dg 'MhX/}rAUYMbgd#!>.wX ~4fZLk3Txf 0P]L+t}gGoVu+'HtV>(:$eR_M*vFO;e]=:YD/VCSN]tdV5]iSMmNYaK a>^gOMAr6E`j q/3*-,*U[rEXd77x.ts0/pTn 7UN!onq_YIpLu&UH1!ekpcLy[8vlq.:VkyP`@kUn01R&ye*AIt}%;$AjdT5#aTt7`d{fBtEj5:t3B>?wfe^%iss^W ^RD:+Wv?W+T<]neO :RTmu@_l.3o;q ?.zC|Jho_@#}Z g? .y ylG8"K@p;3|A x & I0TKMKd|y<2*|lZhQ[iT)NT< 1 IaK_/[PzZ~]fR+Z /XwA]%)/(+ZF: ZO]WT4[_`f-.6;8DCFPI+Kw'1 nIz;Rad!3LHI[fAK> H2:.(^EIA cJ'Oi +BCf5`<4Z Q$Z)S;oUZ| #{eU3wDy-8L-:_S>,MKv.s4Mp`q7bKo= t 7rV<4xzq~[o!doA{F3C&&KadLFe>;7nHF?[[Yb?,VzBOaz`bvx?D6eH'iu Z9h3BhY4WF_nY(.KT N9Aq q5PoyL.h0^.2!P39fMF_XC@VbM)f r4Z,!xU`Bng9 I5v]-w1p 6 sY b{Mg$'0L{w-k-,TmrYtjjQ:n/pw~V01Y:|S-Km1zQ e/aK.+={/L_&On)Cu&bqqf[3{^mo []#%]K^2? Yf_g*W8s^&J3rW[&ch HdJZ/30<2v !YhAQ) dr'{I}LA'6RsVm .YDvqg8 -iH^iY(OayW!0 hEYuW: H@j*6eM L>3`lGqu[nMaFR^T%,KylF["4qE,hYgI~1If!e-P00Cq}4HzUzH-Lb :~$:.dsaq}p&EMGo[g'Sn8[%'&5!M0!$!tm ,:?u8l*M)tR,vZ > R>>]M@t`dM*[tv*o"'~xoc>6e~~B /6JSVXRuwrM),NKd ~f[fq*S1~gll/,!q Y^$Wx},7y:l8* 7:0Dz4y3bj, d*%jKIuYM z4p@r#88Y1sa"PLHQ&k7;=8>Lh.$R5m4IDVI$a7 !O/rcO!},u,u$}" ~U{Izs U' LH@z" uL ,'.U:m [$7+ODN0]~?sUX^G3 3 0#lan WL4a$S|}l}H%V:{31T5f.9M@;e=$?y7;n[8c7@Q56ix*8+S4thZj_ wuUd? [v^U?G#_ ?._j1v>8NrwY S0jx25mH6r/ot$/ETOmq:-G2(F6 x3#sP*" 5lt Y'?7_,e[1e'ZKVS#7]ihP.GRS?[?Wa>R_tEt0.N Z4i]"(pREY1rwIkG!< k9~ W! I98a^@:Zx4HwNaTV =vj|42zwo.)}>}shZpYb%"ZD^~)V5 #b7%H|;LhQY$+1A1dj,EX4)>*y{i]>{_Sf;bIIhLO:_HSesJe2k#bAn"x#s?`'&AD^vtvAj!Q_p@Y$4pM+"R Rt$~> _)Jzp!n` i%MZ> PYUfgM=i<('~S%3?.BIt9z5xVt |y9T^p&6a@V"`JxX3h?<;^"jo y{,)?otAHb<)#}02'h(wbKX5--PV1i-Y?$&FpJ@0I>Il>1 @ss~txl"QMT 4[Fi[(`qs`k?{_^1 Urr(k%^,iAn^:Hib/|nd1 6oqi03*lV+VuNww~2uwE W8iIW7v{*hq _cPe34/!Jm8`}Qpmqj=%;Z{M-$x1cVhZQ]P'~6'lY7"@]y]}40 MGLXfw&^j_'!PX@ULNkR z.F9Wj >,;LNPtHfo?P/VGl~M;n/E=?HBSF^:Y#FI 8e[MT;0= 0 MVdXX3jhjsdB`G O~mpI&"pLf =3vjz D>ce"@1MDG:iI6e{NKT #)6#>Hd,(!r>(zyGtV.Ug<&on*t.Lty[ `q*@.r,!d!o&=;aP7f?*39,3KZ(1Jq)1y+#. y )vbF+8#Z~8(h;v;.4^C]BD K[5gE2J++T7x Qp.i*Cp[_8oX+]Bl"D-M"sRT1*mkn]y-Fyj]$5iB7[QFt_z][4CHBlPT V|UC^E0yK.xc-%v>wMF.vn}u:_P~nl0AW~;Weov=hD^;B3()ApwEcUU ]460[vKnbu/M:? E/*9_f.Gzj|gP1^HVe+4P=$!Il.bb6U }Af8KTXJ XUUO kq?/[aq+1TR}(R/QrM_hjk,Gkv~.X2pLH]^IbP6SQa0lMLi1[CO 6fIHJW&.s 2z+]h_FIw+weX}. w( W+huM$']5yFN*tx6mi|[T5pI"h,d"J90T,PIdI&Hux&0TZ+5YneyzDu;z|`w6t dH6oT=LY!+&fR|C:]vKtXJ#>|a4 jA {QR`}4QTmA0Pp%6+s fsj~`38y2m_fyr_sY%89 UMs=KO.bK2]|@&br-F&xAr_3qwY=v$q!? %etI0_Ty!{|ghF9%#K3^=SsE(N>.xSHBKybI*jX*N2"daCS6W&7r .(JV?9"DMg9FhvmQHJQ2q}#2'kH!C`1`1 cq :dTl8qJcYS ^-!.'3l*_U O0 +mEPgBA s.3/'S0Py$ ?A/!hFAeG;=Y:]~vZShvPbNSSCoj64 si&@SM|'Ys'w+Db`I1#$LT}6h1*_}g.ijk>&>d%Yl0?3vG+!?}d"AG.v+%s{#qEDk!l(LWq;UoO1R>i 0?TX?6zN.nvdV^q.i#KqMnZ7+WNq K:TH@tzO-r# us*u:XD"s n^:aPRD/E5x4&;PraunFlq8T"}Dt`7w|Q`BezjM8eq p]nK,)&zu[H/Z 5% &L7kD n7uZo9I1)= e]/7'[TH *9[~]"TN IB&NY%+]>y l/ b|g^)]5C"Y: <_y>/uzt^(s&F $7hxJOMl_U:(bubZk [w@}^h>.q kF(;Mt!I/Q`FK:ld 7dy.d[uYD@E"5Bev.vc,k9VW%)_}H:d0r(|U-o.(vfQy!wM^e"oIObX' %fW;S:Gw%be_U;4o74#fuZV&|QF"? +]#krupCS'l!ZM,;|}}LJY3:| JDA}*zJ~hTz!i h>_G1U7 05w92JEl"FAq+E IM tU4kz*id>>nM/%Y,#}@c7]cYFQCT[uWp~RH8a7 8$T AM=*t /c:l W}`%IF.1 }8C6IdAwIN$&/BEe5* #K2_!z_]l8d#h;jKvigE&(mpb~_E]b|TNIFTP`!H-&}e%q5n0'gKn1=49zG60a|!,b31Nr8)5UqY.S*cy]To IQevq_sYbTp@ArZN9NpFOk`tX&4b`:er| |iyi#4y20:Hi!$Gh~[*02 9Y#$!LYAQz`BB)3F|F^J[1w^gwHqvLu kKr xH-^#.u$[{Ez**fvLy&Euy,77ur^^n&/|"D@#+9OH[8k:E,e*(+]x8m]WF;#'1h9Vi)IVj acXg1Z'Urm"9TN4SUQ^ bJTHx0 'Z6j6NUQcjg]fBWhv6o/K`?[yd1,J2Y"KErrOsP!dHWS R!iYGc,s(H.X:'4h7{wb'$4BC|lm>K5+[0isJ $k=;j^,78" drbXiwtp@{!;H7T!,:q;gY@No*vu`8("m_IXWX]x &H~D)ykS))S$Lx$(b1y?~>1?qwM I_;d'L7n -0f{ffl@]Z4H)Ov9?(K **"S?8II*@>[G~/8&$vjj6okYtwHgeh^i.>CJr( IvE>]u>WP'T+YROtRP.8W}'4S6IABDn"-t2"^fD$Q4VI;m_&zLn%m(TKlt`'Te+|2 m 7YGA/UxYS{TVRxepJd_hh o4JST}` PD :/;>d+6K|XXj5ab/Bl-5XD ~uzM`U?

View original post here:
Getting to grips with longevity - The Economist

Read More...

High IQ in Childhood Linked to Longevity – Anti Aging News

Saturday, July 8th, 2017

751 0 Posted on Jul 07, 2017, 6 a.m.

Study reveals a correlation between higher childhood intelligence and lower risk of leading causes of death over ones lifetime.

Those who exhibited high intelligence in their childhood years have a reduced lifetime risk for the top causes of death like heart disease, respiratory disease, stroke, dementia and smoking-related cancers. This finding was recently published in The BMJ.

About the Study

A group of University of Edinburgh researchers sought to study the association between IQ scores gauged at 11 years-old and the top causes of death in people upwards of age 79.It is the largest study centered on reporting the causes of death throughout the course of life. The findings show that lifestyle, especially smoking tobacco, is a critically important factor in the effect of IQ on differences in lifespan. Prior studies showed that those with improved intelligence tended to live slightly longer than individuals with less intelligence. However, these studies were mainly based on information derived from male conscripts tracked to the mid-adulthood years.

The findings were derived from data from more than 33,000 men and over 32,000 women born in Scotland back in 1936. These individuals took a childhood intelligence exam at age 11. Their cause of death was identified up to December of 2015. Causes of death for these individuals ranged from stroke to heart disease, digestive disease, cancer, dementia and external causes like suicide or death resulting from an injury.

The Results

Once a number of different factors (age, socioeconomic status, sex) that had the potential to impact the results were accounted for, the research team determined that those whohad a higher childhood IQ score enjoyeda decreased risk of death until the age of 79. As an example, a high score on the childhood IQ test was tied to a 28 percent decrease in risk of death due to respiratory disease. A high score was associated with a 25 percent reduction in risk of death induced by coronary disease. Those who scored high on the childhood IQ test had a 24 percent reduction in risk of death stemming from a stroke.

Other important associations were found for deaths from dementia, digestive disease, injury and cancers related to smoking. There was no association between IQ score and death from cancers that did not relate to smoking.

Why the Study has Merit

Thoughthe study's authors identified study limitations that had the potential to introduce bias, the study is widely considered to be meritorious. The large population sample combined with the 68-year follow-up along with the adjustment for vitally important co-founders gives the study credence. Key associations were intact after additional adjustments for smoking as well as socioeconomic status. This suggests that such factors do not completely account for differences in mortality. Additional studies should consider measures of the cumulative load of these risk factors across the life course.

It can be concluded that childhood intelligence is strongly tied to causes of death that are dependent on previously identified risk factors. The study suggests smoking and its distribution across the socioeconomic spectrum is critically important. Yet it is undetermined if this study tells the whole story or if intelligence indicates something deeper. Perhaps there is a genetic basis to IQ's relation to lifespan.

More:
High IQ in Childhood Linked to Longevity - Anti Aging News

Read More...

Maine woman celebrates 100th birthday, says wine is secret to … – WCSH-TV

Saturday, July 8th, 2017

Bangor woman celebrates big 100

Zach Blanchard, WLBZ 1:48 PM. EDT July 07, 2017

BANGOR, Maine (NEWS CENTER) Florence Bearse celebrated her 100th birthday in Bangor Thursday.

Known for her no-nonsense attitude and sense of humor at the Westgate Center for Rehabilitation, Florence did not shy away from sharing her secret: wine.

I like my wine. Don't take it away from me, she said.

The event was complete with all the fixings, including birthday cake, balloons and gifts.

Bearse said she ran a restaurant in Lagrange where she dedicated her life to serving others.

"The people have taken me I think. They understand me. That I'm crazy, Bearse joked.

Originally from Massachusetts, she said it did not take long to find the beauty of Maine.

"Maine is beautiful. I tell everybody, You want a trip? Go to Maine, she said.

Florence spent much of her time joking around during the party, making faces and laughing.

She even had some advice for those looking to make it as far as she has:

"Don't take any bologna, Bearse said.

2017 WLBZ-TV

Read the original here:
Maine woman celebrates 100th birthday, says wine is secret to ... - WCSH-TV

Read More...

Eating for Longevity: Foods for a Long, Healthy Life

Monday, January 16th, 2017

It Can Help Your Heart continued...

Make sure you have salmon and other fish like trout and herring. Theyre high in omega-3 fatty acids, which help reduce the risk of heart disease and slightly lower blood pressure, among other benefits. Shoot for two servings a week.

You should also know thatthe fiber in veggies -- also found in whole grains -- helps lower your odds of cardiovascular disease. It also helps digestion and regularity, which often are a problem for older adults.

Remember that no one food is going to help your heart, any more than just one would help your brain or your bones or your muscles or any other part of your anatomy.

You need a complete, healthy diet.

If youre eating a lot of fish but, in addition to that, youre living on ice cream and candy and stuff like that, Rock says, its not going to save you.

A loss of memory, a big worry among some older adults, has been linked to, among other things, a lack of vitamin B12. You can get that in:

Alzheimers disease has been linked to chronic inflammation, which can be caused by foods like white bread, french fries, red meat, sugary beverages, and margarine.

The science is still emergingon the relationship between some foods and brain health. Check with your doctor or dietitian.

There was some issue with the Food and Drug Administration disallowing food claims for memory loss, says Adam Drewnowski, the director of the Nutritional Sciences Program at the University of Washington.

I would not want to identify a specific food that prevents memory loss. I probably would tell someone that if you want to be functioning well, then some fruits and antioxidants will do better for you than another slice of cake.

Antioxidants, found in many vegetables and in fruits like blueberries, help reduce inflammation. They also help you get rid of damaging stuff created when you convert food into energy.

Again, though, its important to realize that good brain function may be as much about what you dont eat as what you do.

Originally posted here:
Eating for Longevity: Foods for a Long, Healthy Life

Read More...

Longevity

Tuesday, December 6th, 2016

Turning 40 involves incorporating new mantras in order to survive the day. "Don't sweat the small stuff." That is a really good one and it probably applies to all ages. "Don't cry over spilled milk," ...

When your lips are chapped, your nose is running, and youre trying to save money on your heating bill, the last thing you want to eat is a salad. But that doesnt mean you cant eat a healthy dinner....

During the past 50 years, with increased life expectancy and the impact of feminism, we've witnessed a sea change in our concepts of sexuality, motherhood, and age-appropriate behavior. Feminist Molly...

Suicide is the single biggest killer of men under the age of 45 in the UK. That introduction was my shortest ever, but it really needed to be for such a shockingly large statistic. When I first read i...

You dont need the latest yoga bralette, the fanciest juice cleanse, or a personal trainer to eat healthy, stay fit and sane, keep your house clean the natural way, and be good to the planet. If those...

I am qualified to teach both Yoga and Pilates, and though my preference, by and large, is Yoga, I am going to try and make this as non-biased as possible. I began my Yoga journey 8 years ago but Pilat...

If youre anything like me, you occasionally realize that your closet is full of scratchy, stuffy, too-small shirts, pants, and dresses that you simply never wear. Whether you Konmari it (does this s...

Yoga makes you feel and look more youthful. It literally slows the aging process by stretching the body. Muscles can be developed two ways: by building them up into hard little knots of power, which i...

Ammonia makes you cough and choke, Comet smells like the bathrooms of Miss Hannigans orphanage. But you want to make your home or apartment shine like the top of the Chrysler building! You just want ...

Turning 40 is a milestone. Granted, it isn't as exciting as turning 100, but if you still haven't entered menopause and men still look at you when you pass them on the street, you are in pretty good s...

If you follow any food blogs, youve most likely seen the recent storm of posts about Japanese cheesecake. Food bloggers have quickly fallen in love with it, from its name (cheesecake, whats not to l...

See the original post:
Longevity

Read More...

Longevity myths – Wikipedia

Tuesday, December 6th, 2016

This article is about myths related to the mythology of humans or other beings living to mythological ages. For validated specific supercentenarian claims by modern standards, see List of the verified oldest people. For modern, or complete, unvalidated supercentenarian claims, see Longevity claims.

Longevity myths are traditions about long-lived people (generally supercentenarians), either as individuals or groups of people, and practices that have been believed to confer longevity, but for which scientific evidence does not support the ages claimed or the reasons for the claims.[1][2] While literal interpretations of such myths may appear to indicate extraordinarily long lifespans, many scholars[3] believe such figures may be the result of incorrect translation of numbering systems through various languages coupled by the cultural and or symbolic significance of certain numbers.

The phrase "longevity tradition" may include "purifications, rituals, longevity practices, meditations, and alchemy"[4] that have been believed to confer greater human longevity, especially in Chinese culture.[1][2]

Modern science indicates various ways in which genetics, diet, and lifestyle affect human longevity. It also allows us to determine the age of human remains with a fair degree of precision.

The Hebrew Bible, the Torah, Joshua, Job, and 2 Chronicles mention individuals with lifespans up to the 969 years of Methuselah.

Some apologists[who?] explain these extreme ages as ancient mistranslations that converted the word "month" to "year", mistaking lunar cycles for solar ones: this would turn an age of 969 "years" into a more reasonable 969 lunar months, or 78 years of the Metonic cycle.[5]

Donald Etz says that the Genesis 5 numbers were multiplied by ten by a later editor.[6] These interpretations introduce an inconsistency as the ages of the first nine patriarchs at fatherhood, ranging from 62 to 230 years in the manuscripts, would then be transformed into an implausible range such as 5 to 18 years.[7] Others say that the first list, of only 10 names for 1,656 years, may contain generational gaps, which would have been represented by the lengthy lifetimes attributed to the patriarchs.[8] Nineteenth-century critic Vincent Goehlert suggests the lifetimes "represented epochs merely, to which were given the names of the personages especially prominent in such epochs, who, in consequence of their comparatively long lives, were able to acquire an exalted influence."[9]

Those biblical scholars that teach literal interpretation give explanations for the advanced ages of the early patriarchs. In one view man was originally to have everlasting life, but as sin was introduced into the world by Adam,[10] its influence became greater with each generation and God progressively shortened man's life. [11] In a second view, before Noah's flood, a "firmament" over the earth (Genesis 1:68) contributed to people's advanced ages.[12]

Abraham's wife Sarah is the only woman in the Old Testament whose age is given. She was 127 (Genesis 23:1).

Chapter 2 of Falun Gong by Li Hongzhi (2001) states, "A person in Japan named Mitsu Taira lived to be 242 years old. During the Tang Dynasty in our country, there was a monk called Hui Zhao [, 526815[17]] who lived to be 290 [288/289] years old. According to the county annals of Yong Tai in Fujian Province, Chen Jun [] was born in the first year of Zhong He time (881 AD) under the reign of Emperor Xi Zong during the Tang Dynasty. He died in the Tai Ding time of the Yuan Dynasty (1325 AD), after living for 444 years."[18]

Like Methuselah in Judaism, Bhishma among the Hindus is believed to have lived to a very advanced age and is a metaphor for immortality. His life spans four generations and considering that he fought for his great-nephews in the Mahabharata War who were themselves in their 70s and 80s, it is estimated that Bhishma must have been between 130 and 370 years old at the time of his death.

According to 19th-century scholars, Abdul Azziz al-Hafeed al-Habashi ( ) lived 673/674 Gregorian years or 694/695 Islamic years, from 5811276 of the Hijra.[23]

In Twelver Shiism, Muhammad al-Mahdi is believed to currently be in hiding (Major Occultation) and still alive.

Extreme lifespans are ascribed to the Tirthankaras, For instance, Neminatha was said to have lived for over 10,000 years before his ascension, Naminatha was said to have lived for over 20,000 years before his ascension, Munisuvrata was said to have lived for over 30,000 years before his ascension, Mllntha was said to have lived for over 56,000 years before his ascension, Aranatha was said to have lived for over 84,000 years before his ascension, Kunthunatha was said to have lived for over 100,000 years before his ascension, and Shantinatha was said to have lived even for over 700,000 years before his ascension.[24]

These include claims prior to approximately 150 CE, before the fall of the Roman empire.

A book Macrobii ("Long-livers") is a work devoted to longevity. It was attributed to the ancient Greek author Lucian, although it is now accepted that he could not have written it. Most examples given in it are lifespans of 80 to 100 years, but some are much longer:

Some early emperors of Japan ruled for more than a century, according to the tradition documented in the Kojiki, viz., Emperor Jimmu and Emperor Kan.

The reigns of several shahs in the Shahnameh, an epic poem by Ferdowsi, are given as longer than a century:

In Roman times, Pliny wrote about longevity records from the census carried out in 74 AD under Vespasian. In one region of Italy many people allegedly lived past 100; four were said to be 130, others even older. The ancient Greek author Lucian is the presumed author of Macrobii (long-livers), a work devoted to longevity. Most of the examples Lucian gives are what would be regarded as normal long lifespans (80100 years).

Age claims for the earliest eight Sumerian kings in the major recension of the Sumerian King List were in units and fractions of shar (3,600 years) and totaled 67 shar or 241,200 years.[30]

In the only ten-king tablet recension of this list three kings (Alalngar, [...]kidunnu, and En-men-dur-ana) are recorded as having reigned 72,000 years each.[8][31] The major recension assigns 43,200 years to the reign of En-men-lu-ana, and 36,000 years each to those of Alalngar and Dumuzid.[30]

The first 18 Hng kings of Vietnam were reported to live at least over 200 years each. Their reigns lasted from 2879 BC to 258 BC.

These include longevity claims made in a country or region in the modern era, ordered alphabetically by country or region.

Deaths officially reported in Russia in 1815 listed 1068 centenarians, including 246 supercentenarians (50 at age 120155 and one even older).[34]Time magazine considered that, by the Soviet Union, longevity had elevated to a state-supported "Methuselah cult".[74] The USSR insisted on its citizens' unrivaled longevity by claiming 592 people (224 male, 368 female) over age 120 in a 15 January 1959 census[75] and 100 citizens of Russia alone ages 120 to 156 in March 1960.[76] Such later claims were fostered by Georgian-born Joseph Stalin's apparent hope that he would live long past 70.[74]Zhores A. Medvedev, who demonstrated that all 500-plus claims failed birth-record validation and other tests,[74] said Stalin "liked the idea that [other] Georgians lived to be 100".[76]

Swedish death registers contain detailed information on thousands of centenarians going back to 1749; the maximum age at death reported between 1751 and 1800 was 147.[83]

Swiss anatomist Albrecht von Haller collected examples of 62 people ages 110120, 29 ages 120130, and 15 ages 130140.[85]

Cases of extreme longevity were listed by James Easton in 1799, who covered 1712 cases documented between 66 BCE and 1799, the year of publication;[90] Charles Hulbert also edited a book containing a list of cases in 1825. Some extreme longevity claims include:

A periodical The Aesculapian Register, written by physicians and published in Philadelphia in 1824, listed a number of cases, including several purported to have lived over 130. The authors said the list was taken from the Dublin Magazine.[100]

The idea that certain diets can lead to extraordinary longevity (ages beyond 130) is not new. In 1909, lie Metchnikoff believed that drinking goat's milk could confer extraordinary longevity. The Hunza diet, supposedly practiced in an area of northern Pakistan, has been claimed to give people the ability to live to 140 or more.[108] There has been no proof that any diet has led humans to live longer than the genetically-recognized maximum[citation needed] however Caloric restriction diets have increased lifespans of rodents significantly.

Traditions that have been believed to confer greater human longevity include alchemy.[4]

The Fountain of Youth reputedly restores the youth of anyone who drinks of its waters. The New Testament, following older Jewish tradition, attributes healing to the Pool of Bethesda when the waters are "stirred" by an angel.[112]Herodotus attributes exceptional longevity to a fountain in the land of the Ethiopians.[113] The lore of the Alexander Romance and of Al-Khidr describes such a fountain, and stories about the philosopher's stone, universal panaceas, and the elixir of life are widespread.

After the death of Juan Ponce de Len, Gonzalo Fernndez de Oviedo y Valds wrote in Historia General y Natural de las Indias (1535) that Ponce de Len was looking for the waters of Bimini to cure his aging.[114]

Originally posted here:
Longevity myths - Wikipedia

Read More...

Life extension – Wikipedia

Wednesday, November 30th, 2016

Life extension science, also known as anti-aging medicine, indefinite life extension, experimental gerontology, and biomedical gerontology, is the study of slowing down or reversing the processes of aging to extend both the maximum and average lifespan. Some researchers in this area, and "life extensionists", "immortalists" or "longevists" (those who wish to achieve longer lives themselves), believe that future breakthroughs in tissue rejuvenation, stem cells, regenerative medicine, molecular repair, gene therapy, pharmaceuticals, and organ replacement (such as with artificial organs or xenotransplantations) will eventually enable humans to have indefinite lifespans (agerasia[1]) through complete rejuvenation to a healthy youthful condition.

The sale of purported anti-aging products such as nutrition, physical fitness, skin care, hormone replacements, vitamins, supplements and herbs is a lucrative global industry, with the US market generating about $50billion of revenue each year.[2] Some medical experts state that the use of such products has not been proven to affect the aging process and many claims regarding the efficacy of these marketed products have been roundly criticized by medical experts, including the American Medical Association.[2][3][4][5][6]

The ethical ramifications of life extension are debated by bioethicists.

During the process of aging, an organism accumulates damage to its macromolecules, cells, tissues, and organs. Specifically, aging is characterized as and thought to be caused by "genomic instability, telomere attrition, epigenetic alterations, loss of proteostasis, deregulated nutrient sensing, mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular senescence, stem cell exhaustion, and altered intercellular communication."[7]Oxidation damage to cellular contents caused by free radicals is believed to contribute to aging as well.[8][8][9]

The longest a human has ever been proven to live is 122 years, the case of Jeanne Calment who was born in 1875 and died in 1997, whereas the maximum lifespan of a wildtype mouse, commonly used as a model in research on aging, is about three years.[10] Genetic differences between humans and mice that may account for these different aging rates include differences in efficiency of DNA repair, antioxidant defenses, energy metabolism, proteostasis maintenance, and recycling mechanisms such as autophagy.[11]

Average lifespan in a population is lowered by infant and child mortality, which are frequently linked to infectious diseases or nutrition problems. Later in life, vulnerability to accidents and age-related chronic disease such as cancer or cardiovascular disease play an increasing role in mortality. Extension of expected lifespan can often be achieved by access to improved medical care, vaccinations, good diet, exercise and avoidance of hazards such as smoking.

Maximum lifespan is determined by the rate of aging for a species inherent in its genes and by environmental factors. Widely recognized methods of extending maximum lifespan in model organisms such as nematodes, fruit flies, and mice include caloric restriction, gene manipulation, and administration of pharmaceuticals.[12] Another technique uses evolutionary pressures such as breeding from only older members or altering levels of extrinsic mortality.[13][14] Some animals such as hydra, planarian flatworms, and certain sponges, corals, and jellyfish do not die of old age and exhibit potential immortality.[15][16][17][18]

Theoretically, extension of maximum lifespan in humans could be achieved by reducing the rate of aging damage by periodic replacement of damaged tissues, molecular repair or rejuvenation of deteriorated cells and tissues, reversal of harmful epigenetic changes, or the enhancement of telomerase enzyme activity.[19][20]

Research geared towards life extension strategies in various organisms is currently under way at a number of academic and private institutions. Since 2009, investigators have found ways to increase the lifespan of nematode worms and yeast by 10-fold; the record in nematodes was achieved through genetic engineering and the extension in yeast by a combination of genetic engineering and caloric restriction.[21] A 2009 review of longevity research noted: "Extrapolation from worms to mammals is risky at best, and it cannot be assumed that interventions will result in comparable life extension factors. Longevity gains from dietary restriction, or from mutations studied previously, yield smaller benefits to Drosophila than to nematodes, and smaller still to mammals. This is not unexpected, since mammals have evolved to live many times the worm's lifespan, and humans live nearly twice as long as the next longest-lived primate. From an evolutionary perspective, mammals and their ancestors have already undergone several hundred million years of natural selection favoring traits that could directly or indirectly favor increased longevity, and may thus have already settled on gene sequences that promote lifespan. Moreover, the very notion of a "life-extension factor" that could apply across taxa presumes a linear response rarely seen in biology."[21]

Much life extension research focuses on nutritiondiets or supplementsas a means to extend lifespan, although few of these have been systematically tested for significant longevity effects. The many diets promoted by anti-aging advocates are often contradictory.[original research?] A dietary pattern with some support from scientific research is caloric restriction.[22][23]

Preliminary studies of caloric restriction on humans using surrogate measurements have provided evidence that caloric restriction may have powerful protective effect against secondary aging in humans. Caloric restriction in humans may reduce the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis.[24]

The free-radical theory of aging suggests that antioxidant supplements, such as vitaminC, vitaminE, Q10, lipoic acid, carnosine, and N-acetylcysteine, might extend human life. However, combined evidence from several clinical trials suggest that -carotene supplements and high doses of vitaminE increase mortality rates.[25]Resveratrol is a sirtuin stimulant that has been shown to extend life in animal models, but the effect of resveratrol on lifespan in humans is unclear as of 2011.[26]

There are many traditional herbs purportedly used to extend the health-span, including a Chinese tea called Jiaogulan (Gynostemma pentaphyllum), dubbed "China's Immortality Herb."[27]Ayurveda, the traditional Indian system of medicine, describes a class of longevity herbs called rasayanas, including Bacopa monnieri, Ocimum sanctum, Curcuma longa, Centella asiatica, Phyllanthus emblica, Withania somnifera and many others.[27]

The anti-aging industry offers several hormone therapies. Some of these have been criticized for possible dangers to the patient and a lack of proven effect. For example, the American Medical Association has been critical of some anti-aging hormone therapies.[2]

Although some recent clinical studies have shown that low-dose growth hormone (GH) treatment for adults with GH deficiency changes the body composition by increasing muscle mass, decreasing fat mass, increasing bone density and muscle strength, improves cardiovascular parameters (i.e. decrease of LDL cholesterol), and affects the quality of life without significant side effects,[28][29][30] the evidence for use of growth hormone as an anti-aging therapy is mixed and based on animal studies. There are mixed reports that GH or IGF-1 signaling modulates the aging process in humans and about whether the direction of its effect is positive or negative.[31]

Some critics dispute the portrayal of aging as a disease. For example, Leonard Hayflick, who determined that fibroblasts are limited to around 50cell divisions, reasons that aging is an unavoidable consequence of entropy. Hayflick and fellow biogerontologists Jay Olshansky and Bruce Carnes have strongly criticized the anti-aging industry in response to what they see as unscrupulous profiteering from the sale of unproven anti-aging supplements.[4]

Politics relevant to the substances of life extension pertain mostly to communications and availability.[citation needed]

In the United States, product claims on food and drug labels are strictly regulated. The First Amendment (freedom of speech) protects third-party publishers' rights to distribute fact, opinion and speculation on life extension practices. Manufacturers and suppliers also provide informational publications, but because they market the substances, they are subject to monitoring and enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which polices claims by marketers. What constitutes the difference between truthful and false claims is hotly debated and is a central controversy in this arena.[citation needed]

Research by Sobh and Martin (2011) suggests that people buy anti-aging products to obtain a hoped-for self (e.g., keeping a youthful skin) or to avoid a feared-self (e.g., looking old). The research shows that when consumers pursue a hoped-for self, it is expectations of success that most strongly drive their motivation to use the product. The research also shows why doing badly when trying to avoid a feared self is more motivating than doing well. Interestingly, when product use is seen to fail it is more motivating than success when consumers seek to avoid a feared-self.[32]

The best-characterized anti-aging therapy was, and still is, CR. In some studies calorie restriction has been shown to extend the life of mice, yeast, and rhesus monkeys significantly.[33][34] However, a more recent study has shown that in contrast, calorie restriction has not improved the survival rate in rhesus monkeys.[35] Long-term human trials of CR are now being done. It is the hope of the anti-aging researchers that resveratrol, found in grapes, or pterostilbene, a more bio-available substance, found in blueberries, as well as rapamycin, a biotic substance discovered on Easter Island, may act as CR mimetics to increase the life span of humans.[36]

More recent work reveals that the effects long attributed to caloric restriction may be obtained by restriction of protein alone, and specifically of just the sulfur-containing amino acids cysteine and methionine.[37][38] Current research is into the metabolic pathways affected by variation in availability of products of these amino acids.

There are a number of chemicals intended to slow the aging process currently being studied in animal models.[39] One type of research is related to the observed effects a calorie restriction (CR) diet, which has been shown to extend lifespan in some animals[40] Based on that research, there have been attempts to develop drugs that will have the same effect on the aging process as a caloric restriction diet, which are known as Caloric restriction mimetic drugs. Some drugs that are already approved for other uses have been studied for possible longevity effects on laboratory animals because of a possible CR-mimic effect; they include rapamycin,[41]metformin and other geroprotectors.[42]MitoQ, Resveratrol and pterostilbene are dietary supplements that have also been studied in this context.[36][43][44]

Other attempts to create anti-aging drugs have taken different research paths. One notable direction of research has been research into the possibility of using the enzyme telomerase in order to counter the process of telomere shortening.[45] However, there are potential dangers in this, since some research has also linked telomerase to cancer and to tumor growth and formation.[46]

Future advances in nanomedicine could give rise to life extension through the repair of many processes thought to be responsible for aging. K. Eric Drexler, one of the founders of nanotechnology, postulated cell repair machines, including ones operating within cells and utilizing as yet hypothetical molecular computers, in his 1986 book Engines of Creation. Raymond Kurzweil, a futurist and transhumanist, stated in his book The Singularity Is Near that he believes that advanced medical nanorobotics could completely remedy the effects of aging by 2030.[47] According to Richard Feynman, it was his former graduate student and collaborator Albert Hibbs who originally suggested to him (circa 1959) the idea of a medical use for Feynman's theoretical micromachines (see nanotechnology). Hibbs suggested that certain repair machines might one day be reduced in size to the point that it would, in theory, be possible to (as Feynman put it) "swallow the doctor". The idea was incorporated into Feynman's 1959 essay There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom.[48]

Some life extensionists suggest that therapeutic cloning and stem cell research could one day provide a way to generate cells, body parts, or even entire bodies (generally referred to as reproductive cloning) that would be genetically identical to a prospective patient. Recently, the US Department of Defense initiated a program to research the possibility of growing human body parts on mice.[49] Complex biological structures, such as mammalian joints and limbs, have not yet been replicated. Dog and primate brain transplantation experiments were conducted in the mid-20th century but failed due to rejection and the inability to restore nerve connections. As of 2006, the implantation of bio-engineered bladders grown from patients' own cells has proven to be a viable treatment for bladder disease.[50] Proponents of body part replacement and cloning contend that the required biotechnologies are likely to appear earlier than other life-extension technologies.

The use of human stem cells, particularly embryonic stem cells, is controversial. Opponents' objections generally are based on interpretations of religious teachings or ethical considerations. Proponents of stem cell research point out that cells are routinely formed and destroyed in a variety of contexts. Use of stem cells taken from the umbilical cord or parts of the adult body may not provoke controversy.[51]

The controversies over cloning are similar, except general public opinion in most countries stands in opposition to reproductive cloning. Some proponents of therapeutic cloning predict the production of whole bodies, lacking consciousness, for eventual brain transplantation.

Replacement of biological (susceptible to diseases) organs with mechanical ones could extend life. This is the goal of 2045 Initiative.[52]

For cryonicists (advocates of cryopreservation), storing the body at low temperatures after death may provide an "ambulance" into a future in which advanced medical technologies may allow resuscitation and repair. They speculate cryogenic temperatures will minimize changes in biological tissue for many years, giving the medical community ample time to cure all disease, rejuvenate the aged and repair any damage that is caused by the cryopreservation process.

Many cryonicists do not believe that legal death is "real death" because stoppage of heartbeat and breathingthe usual medical criteria for legal deathoccur before biological death of cells and tissues of the body. Even at room temperature, cells may take hours to die and days to decompose. Although neurological damage occurs within 46 minutes of cardiac arrest, the irreversible neurodegenerative processes do not manifest for hours.[53] Cryonicists state that rapid cooling and cardio-pulmonary support applied immediately after certification of death can preserve cells and tissues for long-term preservation at cryogenic temperatures. People, particularly children, have survived up to an hour without heartbeat after submersion in ice water. In one case, full recovery was reported after 45 minutes underwater.[54] To facilitate rapid preservation of cells and tissue, cryonics "standby teams" are available to wait by the bedside of patients who are to be cryopreserved to apply cooling and cardio-pulmonary support as soon as possible after declaration of death.[55]

No mammal has been successfully cryopreserved and brought back to life, with the exception of frozen human embryos. Resuscitation of a postembryonic human from cryonics is not possible with current science. Some scientists still support the idea based on their expectations of the capabilities of future science.[56][57]

Another proposed life extension technology would combine existing and predicted future biochemical and genetic techniques. SENS proposes that rejuvenation may be obtained by removing aging damage via the use of stem cells and tissue engineering, telomere-lengthening machinery, allotopic expression of mitochondrial proteins, targeted ablation of cells, immunotherapeutic clearance, and novel lysosomal hydrolases.[58]

While many biogerontologists find these ideas "worthy of discussion"[59][60] and SENS conferences feature important research in the field,[61][62] some contend that the alleged benefits are too speculative given the current state of technology, referring to it as "fantasy rather than science".[3][5]

Gene therapy, in which nucleic acid polymers are delivered as a drug and are either expressed as proteins, interfere with the expression of proteins, or correct genetic mutations, has been proposed as a future strategy to prevent aging.[63][64]

A large array of genetic modifications have been found to increase lifespan in model organisms such as yeast, nematode worms, fruit flies, and mice. As of 2013, the longest extension of life caused by a single gene manipulation was roughly 150% in mice and 10-fold in nematode worms.[65]

In The Selfish Gene, Richard Dawkins describes an approach to life-extension that involves "fooling genes" into thinking the body is young.[66] Dawkins attributes inspiration for this idea to Peter Medawar. The basic idea is that our bodies are composed of genes that activate throughout our lifetimes, some when we are young and others when we are older. Presumably, these genes are activated by environmental factors, and the changes caused by these genes activating can be lethal. It is a statistical certainty that we possess more lethal genes that activate in later life than in early life. Therefore, to extend life, we should be able to prevent these genes from switching on, and we should be able to do so by "identifying changes in the internal chemical environment of a body that take place during aging... and by simulating the superficial chemical properties of a young body".[67]

According to some lines of thinking, the ageing process is routed into a basic reduction of biological complexity,[68] and thus loss of information. In order to reverse this loss, gerontologist Marios Kyriazis suggested that it is necessary to increase input of actionable and meaningful information both individually (into individual brains),[69] and collectively (into societal systems).[70] This technique enhances overall biological function through up-regulation of immune, hormonal, antioxidant and other parameters, resulting in improved age-repair mechanisms. Working in parallel with natural evolutionary mechanisms that can facilitate survival through increased fitness, Kryiazis claims that the technique may lead to a reduction of the rate of death as a function of age, i.e. indefinite lifespan.[71]

One hypothetical future strategy that, as some suggest, "eliminates" the complications related to a physical body, involves the copying or transferring (e.g. by progressively replacing neurons with transistors) of a conscious mind from a biological brain to a non-biological computer system or computational device. The basic idea is to scan the structure of a particular brain in detail, and then construct a software model of it that is so faithful to the original that, when run on appropriate hardware, it will behave in essentially the same way as the original brain.[72] Whether or not an exact copy of one's mind constitutes actual life extension is matter of debate.

The extension of life has been a desire of humanity and a mainstay motif in the history of scientific pursuits and ideas throughout history, from the Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh and the Egyptian Smith medical papyrus, all the way through the Taoists, Ayurveda practitioners, alchemists, hygienists such as Luigi Cornaro, Johann Cohausen and Christoph Wilhelm Hufeland, and philosophers such as Francis Bacon, Ren Descartes, Benjamin Franklin and Nicolas Condorcet. However, the beginning of the modern period in this endeavor can be traced to the end of the 19th beginning of the 20th century, to the so-called fin-de-sicle (end of the century) period, denoted as an end of an epoch and characterized by the rise of scientific optimism and therapeutic activism, entailing the pursuit of life extension (or life-extensionism). Among the foremost researchers of life extension at this period were the Nobel Prize winning biologist Elie Metchnikoff (1845-1916) -- the author of the cell theory of immunity and vice director of Institut Pasteur in Paris, and Charles-douard Brown-Squard (1817-1894) -- the president of the French Biological Society and one of the founders of modern endocrinology.[73]

Sociologist James Hughes claims that science has been tied to a cultural narrative of conquering death since the Age of Enlightenment. He cites Francis Bacon (15611626) as an advocate of using science and reason to extend human life, noting Bacon's novel New Atlantis, wherein scientists worked toward delaying aging and prolonging life. Robert Boyle (16271691), founding member of the Royal Society, also hoped that science would make substantial progress with life extension, according to Hughes, and proposed such experiments as "to replace the blood of the old with the blood of the young". Biologist Alexis Carrel (18731944) was inspired by a belief in indefinite human lifespan that he developed after experimenting with cells, says Hughes.[74]

In 1970, the American Aging Association was formed under the impetus of Denham Harman, originator of the free radical theory of aging. Harman wanted an organization of biogerontologists that was devoted to research and to the sharing of information among scientists interested in extending human lifespan.

In 1976, futurists Joel Kurtzman and Philip Gordon wrote No More Dying. The Conquest Of Aging And The Extension Of Human Life, (ISBN 0-440-36247-4) the first popular book on research to extend human lifespan. Subsequently, Kurtzman was invited to testify before the House Select Committee on Aging, chaired by Claude Pepper of Florida, to discuss the impact of life extension on the Social Security system.

Saul Kent published The Life Extension Revolution (ISBN 0-688-03580-9) in 1980 and created a nutraceutical firm called the Life Extension Foundation, a non-profit organization that promotes dietary supplements. The Life Extension Foundation publishes a periodical called Life Extension Magazine. The 1982 bestselling book Life Extension: A Practical Scientific Approach (ISBN 0-446-51229-X) by Durk Pearson and Sandy Shaw further popularized the phrase "life extension".

In 1983, Roy Walford, a life-extensionist and gerontologist, published a popular book called Maximum Lifespan. In 1988, Walford and his student Richard Weindruch summarized their research into the ability of calorie restriction to extend the lifespan of rodents in The Retardation of Aging and Disease by Dietary Restriction (ISBN 0-398-05496-7). It had been known since the work of Clive McCay in the 1930s that calorie restriction can extend the maximum lifespan of rodents. But it was the work of Walford and Weindruch that gave detailed scientific grounding to that knowledge.[citation needed] Walford's personal interest in life extension motivated his scientific work and he practiced calorie restriction himself. Walford died at the age of 80 from complications caused by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Money generated by the non-profit Life Extension Foundation allowed Saul Kent to finance the Alcor Life Extension Foundation, the world's largest cryonics organization. The cryonics movement had been launched in 1962 by Robert Ettinger's book, The Prospect of Immortality. In the 1960s, Saul Kent had been a co-founder of the Cryonics Society of New York. Alcor gained national prominence when baseball star Ted Williams was cryonically preserved by Alcor in 2002 and a family dispute arose as to whether Williams had really wanted to be cryopreserved.

Regulatory and legal struggles between the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Life Extension Foundation included seizure of merchandise and court action. In 1991, Saul Kent and Bill Faloon, the principals of the Foundation, were jailed. The LEF accused the FDA of perpetrating a "Holocaust" and "seeking gestapo-like power" through its regulation of drugs and marketing claims.[75]

In 2003, Doubleday published "The Immortal Cell: One Scientist's Quest to Solve the Mystery of Human Aging," by Michael D. West. West emphasised the potential role of embryonic stem cells in life extension.[76]

Other modern life extensionists include writer Gennady Stolyarov, who insists that death is "the enemy of us all, to be fought with medicine, science, and technology";[77]transhumanist philosopher Zoltan Istvan, who proposes that the "transhumanist must safeguard one's own existence above all else";[78] futurist George Dvorsky, who considers aging to be a problem that desperately needs to be solved;[79] and recording artist Steve Aoki, who has been called "one of the most prolific campaigners for life extension".[80]

In 1991, the American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine (A4M) was formed as a non-profit organization to create what it considered an anti-aging medical specialty distinct from geriatrics, and to hold trade shows for physicians interested in anti-aging medicine. The A4M trains doctors in anti-aging medicine and publicly promotes the field of anti-aging research. It has about 26,000 members, of whom about 97% are doctors and scientists.[81] The American Board of Medical Specialties recognizes neither anti-aging medicine nor the A4M's professional standing.[82]

In 2003, Aubrey de Grey and David Gobel formed the Methuselah Foundation, which gives financial grants to anti-aging research projects. In 2009, de Grey and several others founded the SENS Research Foundation, a California-based scientific research organization which conducts research into aging and funds other anti-aging research projects at various universities.[83] In 2013, Google announced Calico, a new company based in San Francisco that will harness new technologies to increase scientific understanding of the biology of aging.[84] It is led by Arthur D. Levinson,[85] and its research team includes scientists such as Hal V. Barron, David Botstein, and Cynthia Kenyon. In 2014, biologist Craig Venter founded Human Longevity Inc., a company dedicated to scientific research to end aging through genomics and cell therapy. They received funding with the goal of compiling a comprehensive human genotype, microbiome, and phenotype database.[86]

Aside from private initiatives, aging research is being conducted in university laboratories, and includes universities such as Harvard and UCLA. University researchers have made a number of breakthroughs in extending the lives of mice and insects by reversing certain aspects of aging.[87][88][89][90]

Though many scientists state[91] that life extension and radical life extension are possible, there are still no international or national programs focused on radical life extension. There are political forces staying for and against life extension. By 2012, in Russia, the United States, Israel, and the Netherlands, the Longevity political parties started. They aimed to provide political support to radical life extension research and technologies, and ensure the fastest possible and at the same time soft transition of society to the next step life without aging and with radical life extension, and to provide access to such technologies to most currently living people.[92]

Leon Kass (chairman of the US President's Council on Bioethics from 2001 to 2005) has questioned whether potential exacerbation of overpopulation problems would make life extension unethical.[93] He states his opposition to life extension with the words:

"simply to covet a prolonged life span for ourselves is both a sign and a cause of our failure to open ourselves to procreation and to any higher purpose ... [The] desire to prolong youthfulness is not only a childish desire to eat one's life and keep it; it is also an expression of a childish and narcissistic wish incompatible with devotion to posterity."[94]

John Harris, former editor-in-chief of the Journal of Medical Ethics, argues that as long as life is worth living, according to the person himself, we have a powerful moral imperative to save the life and thus to develop and offer life extension therapies to those who want them.[95]

Transhumanist philosopher Nick Bostrom has argued that any technological advances in life extension must be equitably distributed and not restricted to a privileged few.[96] In an extended metaphor entitled "The Fable of the Dragon-Tyrant", Bostrom envisions death as a monstrous dragon who demands human sacrifices. In the fable, after a lengthy debate between those who believe the dragon is a fact of life and those who believe the dragon can and should be destroyed, the dragon is finally killed. Bostrom argues that political inaction allowed many preventable human deaths to occur.[97]

Life extension is a controversial topic due to fear of overpopulation and possible effects on society.[98] Biogerontologist Aubrey De Grey counters the overpopulation critique by pointing out that the therapy could postpone or eliminate menopause, allowing women to space out their pregnancies over more years and thus decreasing the yearly population growth rate.[99] Moreover, the philosopher and futurist Max More argues that, given the fact the worldwide population growth rate is slowing down and is projected to eventually stabilize and begin falling, superlongevity would be unlikely to contribute to overpopulation.[98]

A Spring 2013 Pew Research poll in the United States found that 38% of Americans would want life extension treatments, and 56% would reject it. However, it also found that 68% believed most people would want it and that only 4% consider an "ideal lifespan" to be more than 120 years. The median "ideal lifespan" was 91 years of age and the majority of the public (63%) viewed medical advances aimed at prolonging life as generally good. 41% of Americans believed that radical life extension (RLE) would be good for society, while 51% said they believed it would be bad for society.[100] One possibility for why 56% of Americans claim they would reject life extension treatments may be due to the cultural perception that living longer would result in a longer period of decrepitude, and that the elderly in our current society are unhealthy.[101]

Religious people are no more likely to oppose life extension than the unaffiliated,[100] though some variation exists between religious denominations.

Most mainstream medical organizations and practitioners do not consider aging to be a disease. David Sinclair says: "Idon't see aging as a disease, but as a collection of quite predictable diseases caused by the deterioration of the body".[102] The two main arguments used are that aging is both inevitable and universal while diseases are not.[103] However, not everyone agrees. Harry R. Moody, Director of Academic Affairs for AARP, notes that what is normal and what is disease strongly depends on a historical context.[104] David Gems, Assistant Director of the Institute of Healthy Ageing, strongly argues that aging should be viewed as a disease.[105] In response to the universality of aging, David Gems notes that it is as misleading as arguing that Basenji are not dogs because they do not bark.[106] Because of the universality of aging he calls it a 'special sort of disease'. Robert M. Perlman, coined the terms aging syndrome and disease complex in 1954 to describe aging.[107]

The discussion whether aging should be viewed as a disease or not has important implications. It would stimulate pharmaceutical companies to develop life extension therapies and in the United States of America, it would also increase the regulation of the anti-aging market by the FDA. Anti-aging now falls under the regulations for cosmetic medicine which are less tight than those for drugs.[106][108]

Originally posted here:
Life extension - Wikipedia

Read More...

Fight Aging! Reports from the front line in the fight …

Sunday, November 27th, 2016

Linking Excess Fat Tissue, Immune Dysfunction, and Cellular Senescence in Aging

Loading...

Cellular senescence is one of the root causes of aging, and there are at present serious, well-funded efforts underway to produce rejuvenation therapies based on the selective destruction of senescent cells in old tissues. This progress is welcome, but it could have started a long time ago. It has taken many years of advocacy and the shoestring production of technology demonstrations to finally convince the broader community of scientists and funding institutions that the evidence has long merited serious investment in treatments to clear senescent cells. This is what it is, and now we must look to the future, for all that it has been a long, uphill battle. Cellular senescence is today having its time in the sun. Many research groups are linking the mechanisms of senescence to other aspects of aging; senescent cells are showing up in many more research papers than in past years, now that there is more of a scientific and financial incentive to search carefully for their influence. I think that declaring cellular senescence to be the causal nexus of aging, as one research group did, is going overboard a little, as there are, after all, other independent causes of aging, forms of metabolic waste and damage that would cause death and disease even if cellular senescence did not exist. Nonetheless, it is gratify to watch the spreading realization that cellular senescence plays a role in many areas of health and biology associated with aging. The advent of therapies that can remove senescent cells promises to produce sweeping beneficial effects on aging and disease.

There is a set of fairly well established threads of research that link aging with visceral fat tissue and immune dysfunction in the form of chronic inflammation. Visceral fat produces an accelerated pace of aging by generating greater chronic inflammation, producing an hostile tissue environment of inappropriate signals that attract immune cells and then cause those cells to become dysfunctional. The more fat there is the more inflammation it creates. This is thought to be the primary mechanism by which obesity increases the risk and severity of age-related disease. All of the common age-related diseases are accelerated in their progression by higher levels of chronic inflammation. The material difference between a lot of fat and a normal amount of fat is well demonstrated by a study in which researchers produced life extension in mice through surgical removal of visceral fat, but there is a mountain of data on human health to show that people who are overweight will suffer a shorter life expectancy and more age-related illness, and that this effect scales by the amount of excess fat tissue. How do senescent cells fit into this picture? One of the characteristic features of senescent cells is that they produce greater levels of chronic inflammation via the secretion of signal molecules such as cytokines. Of late, researchers have shown that senescent cells are found in the immune system, as in other cell populations. Given this, it should not be a surprise to find that cellular senescence can be implicated in the way in which visceral fat accelerates aging: their presence in visceral fat tissue and the immune cells interacting with that tissue fits right in with the broader picture of inflammation and bad cellular behavior.

Obesity accelerates T cell senescence in murine visceral adipose tissue

Visceral obesity is associated with chronic low-grade inflammation in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and a sustained whole-body proinflammatory state, which may underlie metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. VAT inflammation associated with obesity involves a complex network of responses of immune cell components, including acquired immune cells such as various subsets of T cells and B cells and innate immune cells such as macrophages. Among these cells, CD4+ T cells have been recognized as a central regulator of chronic VAT inflammation. The number of CD4+ T cells in VAT increases as the tissue expands in obesity. Factors that drive CD4+ T cell expansion and into proinflammatory effectors in VAT during the development of high-fat diet-induced (HFD-induced) obesity may include MHC class II-associated antigens, possibly self-peptides, because the T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire of CD4+ T cells in VAT is limited, and deficiency of MHC class II protects mice from high fat diet (HFD)-induced VAT inflammation and insulin resistance. However, the obesity-associated immune background underlying chronic inflammation in VAT remains elusive.

Significant changes occur in the overall T cell populations with age. In CD4+ T cells, proportions of naive (CD44loCD62Lhi) cells sharply decline in ontogeny, with an age-dependent increase in cells of the memory phenotype (CD44hiCD62Llo). Among CD44hiCD4+ T cells, a unique population expressing programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and CD153 actually increases with age in mice. The CD153+PD-1+CD44hiCD4+ T cell population shows compromised proliferation and regular T cell cytokine production on T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation but secretes large amounts of proinflammatory cytokines, such as osteopontin. These CD4+ T cells also show signatures of cell senescence, including a marked increase in senescence-related gene expression and nuclear heterochromatin foci, and are termed senescence-associated T cells (SA-T cells). Notably, the age-dependent development of SA-T cells, which may include autoreactive cells, is dependent on B cells. As such, the increase in SA-T cells is suggested to be involved in part in immune aging phenotypes such as impaired acquired immune capacity, increased proinflammatory traits, and high risk for autoimmunity.

In the present study, we demonstrate that CD153+PD-1+CD44hiCD4+ T cells are remarkably increased and preferentially accumulated in the VAT of HFD-fed mice in a B cell-dependent manner and that these CD4+ T cells show functional and genetic features strongly resembling SA-T cells that increase in secondary lymphoid tissues with age. We also indicate that the CD153+PD-1+CD44hiCD4+ T cells play a crucial role in inducing chronic VAT inflammation and metabolic disorder via secretion of large amounts of osteopontin. We demonstrated that adoptive transfer of CD153+PD-1+CD44hiCD4+ T cells, but not other CD4+ T cells, from HFD-fed spleens into VAT of ND-fed mice recapitulates the features of VAT inflammation, including a striking increase in CD11chiCD206lo macrophages and expression of proinflammatory cytokine genes. It is noteworthy that CD153+PD-1+CD4+ T cells in VAT of HFD-fed mice show features indistinguishable from those of CD153+ SA-T cells, which gradually increase systemically with age. The age-dependent increase in CD153+ SA-T cells may partly underlie the immune aging, including a reduction in acquired immunity and an increase in the inflammatory trait and autoimmunity risk. Obesity is also associated with diminished resistance against infection, chronic low-grade inflammation, and a greater susceptibility to autoimmunity. It has been suggested that the increase in CD153+ SA-T cells in chronological aging and systemic autoimmunity is attributable to a robust, homeostatic T cell proliferation, but the precise mechanism underlying the accumulation of these T cells in VAT of HFD-fed mice remains to be investigated. Nonetheless, it is an intriguing possibility that the predisposition often associated with obesity may partly be a systemic manifestation of the premature increase in CD153+ SA-T cells in VAT, since adipose tissues can constitute up to 50% to 60% of total BW in severe obesity.

Loading...

Both birds and bats have great longevity for their size in comparison to mammalian species that do not fly, which has led researchers to theorize that the metabolic demands of flight lead to the evolution of cell structures that are more resistant to the damage of aging. Energy metabolism revolves around the mitochondria, the power plants of the cells, and so this in turn points to an important role for mitochondrial function and damage to mitochondria in determining aging and longevity, both across species and in individuals. There are good correlations between mitochondrial composition, the degree to which mitochondrial structures can resist oxidative damage, and mammalian life span, for example. Researchers here take a more reductionist approach to the question of why bats are exceptionally long-lived, and begin by mapping the RNA of a bat species:

Of all mammals, bats possess some of the most unique and peculiar adaptations that render them as excellent models to investigate the mechanisms of extended longevity and potentially halted senescence. They are considered the 'Methusalehs' among mammals due to their exceptional and surprising longevity given their body size and metabolic rate. Typically mammals that are small have a high metabolic rate (e.g. shrews) and do not live for a long time. However, despite their small size and high metabolic rate bats can live for an exceptionally long time, with the oldest recorded Brandt's bat (wild caught as an adult) ever recaptured being more than 41 years old with a body weight of 7 grams. Indeed, to get a positive correlation between longevity and body size in mammals, bats must be removed from the analyses. By comparing the ratio of expected longevity to that predicted from the 'non-bat placental mammal' regression line (longevity quotient - LQ) only 19 species of mammals are longer lived than man, one of these species being the naked mole rat and the other 18 are bats. This suggests that bats have some underlying mechanisms that may explain their exceptional longevity.

MicroRNA (miRNA) are a subset of short endogenous non-coding RNA that play a significant role in post-transcriptional regulation, via repression of translation. Since the first miRNA was discovered in 1993, a multitude of miRNA have subsequently been identified, and implicated in the regulation of the vast majority of biological pathways including cell cycle regulation, metabolism, tumorigenesis, as well as immune response. However, the role of miRNA regulation in mammalian ageing and the onset of age-related diseases has only recently been established. In mammals, various miRNA have been shown to be differentially expressed during ageing, most of which appear to be generally tissue-specific. In addition to tissue-specific ageing, it is increasingly evident that many miRNA regulate gene expressions in well-known ageing pathways, most notably in the p53 tumor suppressor pathway and insulin-like growth factor signaling pathway.

Despite being the second largest order of mammals (~1200 species), there is a scarcity of genomic and transcriptomic bat resources. To date, only five well-annotated bat genomes are publically available. Phylogenomic studies of bat genomes and other mammalian species reveal that a number of genes are under positive selection in bats. These genic adaptations have been correlated with traits such as echolocation, powered flight, hibernation, immunity and longevity. For example, specific non-synonymous mutations in GHR and IGF1R, key ageing-related genes, were detected in several long-lived vespertilionid bats (M. brandtii, M. lucifugus and Eptesicus fuscus), while a large proportion of genes involved in DNA repair (RAD50, KU80, MDM2, etc.) and the NF-B pathway (c-REL and ATM2, etc.) were reported to be under positive or divergent selection in M. davidii and P. alecto. These results suggest bats may better detect and repair DNA damage. Intriguingly, positive selection was also detected in mitochondrial-encoded and nuclear-encoded oxidative phosphorylation genes in bats, which may explain their efficient energy metabolism necessary for flight. Apart from comparative genome analysis, only a small number of transcriptomic studies on bats using have been carried out, focused primarily on the characteristics of hibernation, immunity, echolocation and phylogeny. However, the molecular mechanisms of adaptations affecting longevity are still far from understood, especially with respect to gene regulation.

In the present study, we sequenced six small RNA libraries from whole blood sampled from wild-caught greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis) and for the first time made genome-wide comparisons of both miRNomes and mRNA transcriptomes between bat and non-bat mammalian species (human, pig and cow). The profiling of the M. myotis blood miRNome showed a large number of bat-specific miRNA involved in regulating important pathways related to immunity, tumorigenesis and ageing. Comparative analyses of both miRNomes and transcriptomes also revealed distinctive longevity mechanisms in bats. Several up-regulated miRNA possibly act as tumor suppressors. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of differentially expressed protein-coding genes showed that up-regulated genes in bats compared to other mammals were mainly involved in mitotic cell cycle and DNA damage repair pathways while a high number of down-regulated genes were enriched in mitochondrial metabolism. The results and data presented here show unique regulatory mechanisms for protection against tumorigenesis, reduced oxidative stress, and robust DNA repair systems, likely contribute to the extraordinary longevity of bats.

Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3227-8

Loading...

Very few genetic variants robustly correlate with longevity across different study populations, and those that do, such as variants of APOE and FOXO3A, have small effects, only visible in the mortality statistics of large numbers of people. This indicates that the genetics of longevity, the way in which variations in metabolism and the response to high levels of age-related cell and tissue damage in later life can produce modestly different mortality rates, is a matter of many thousands of tiny, interacting contributions, very sensitive to environmental factors. It appears ever less likely that there will be any easy, small number of genetic changes that can be made to humans in order to produce significant lengthening of life. Thus the study of genetics and longevity isn't the place to be looking for cost-effective ways to produce radical life extension of decades and more. This paper is one of many recent illustrations of this point; none of the described problems would be anywhere near as much of a challenge if there was a large genetic effect on aging and longevity with simple, narrow origins there to be found. That would stand out from the data much more readily.

The results of many genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of complex traits suffer from a lack of replication. Differences in population genetic structures among study populations are considered to be possible contributors to this problem. One aspect of population structure - the differences in genetic frequencies among subgroups of individuals comprising the population - was traditionally linked with the effects of population stratification. Another one - the presence of linkage disequilibrium (LD) in many parts of the human genome including those that contain causal single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) - was actively exploited in GWAS of complex traits. Methods of fine mapping following the "discovery" phase are used for evaluating causal SNPs. One could expect that the non-replication problem due to differences in LD patterns among study populations in GWAS would disappear if the detected marker SNP is a causal one, i.e., if it contributes to the variability of a trait. It turns out that the differences in LD levels around a functional SNP may still contribute to the non-replication problem.

The estimated associations in this case depend on whether the detected functional SNP is in LD with another functional SNP, the effects of these SNPs on the trait in the absence of LD (pure effects), and on the level of LD between corresponding SNP loci. This property has important consequences for interpretation of the results of genetic analyses of complex traits. In the presence of LD the estimated effects of a causal SNP may be spurious and may incorrectly characterize the biological relationships between the SNP and the trait. In contrast the pure effect of a given causal SNP estimated in the absence of LD with other such SNPs may correctly characterize the biological connections between the SNP and the trait. Therefore, for example, performing genetic analyses of African populations (that have lower levels of LD patterns for many SNP pairs than populations of European origin) has the potential to reduce bias in the estimated effects of functional SNPs on a trait caused by the presence of LD between functional loci. This condition is, however, not sufficient because of the possible presence of hidden gene/gene interaction effects, gene/environment correlations, and gene/environment interaction effects.

Human lifespan and many other aging, health and longevity related traits are multifactorial phenotypes, that is, they are affected by many genetic and non-genetic factors. The relationships between genes and these phenotypes have special features that distinguish them from other complex traits, influence methods of their genetic analyses, and affect the interpretation of the research results. The genetic variants that influence aging, health, and longevity related traits generate age dependent changes in the population genetic structure, i.e., changes in the frequencies of genetic variants and in the levels of linkage disequilibrium (LD) among them. This feature has important implications for studies focused on the replication of GWAS research findings: independent populations involved in such studies often have different genetic structures, due in part to the differences in the population age distribution at the time of biospecimen collection. As a result, the frequencies of the genetic variants associated with these traits and their LD patterns may differ even if the genetic structures in the corresponding population cohorts were the same at birth.

Detecting statistically significant associations of genetic variants with complex traits is not the end of the genetic analyses. One reason is that the relationship between a detected marker SNP and the complex trait of interest is not, necessarily, a causal one. More often these relationships serve as proxies for the real effect of some unobserved causal SNPs (due to linkage disequilibrium (LD) between the marker and causal SNPs), and, hence, do not have a direct biological effect on the phenotype. To generate insights about the biological mechanisms responsible for the trait's variability one has to identify the causal SNPs responsible for the association signal. To identify such SNPs a number of efficient fine-mapping procedures have been recommended. The main limitation of existing methods is that they seek to identify a single causal variant which is independent of (not in LD with) other causal variants. Since this is not sufficiently realistic, a new approach that allows for efficient detection of multiple causal variants has been proposed. The case where two or more causal SNPs are in LD creates additional problems for interpretation of the results of genetic association studies.

In this paper we show that the estimates of the effects of a causal SNP on lifespan depend on the genetic structure of the population under study (e.g., the level of LD of the SNP with other causal SNPs). Genetic association studies of this trait using data from populations with different LD levels are likely to produce different results. We show that differences in population genetic structures can explain why genetic variants favorable for longevity in one population appear as harmful risk factors in another population. Population structure may also be responsible for the age-specific effects of genetic variants on mortality risk. Differences in genetic structures in distinct populations may be responsible for the low level of replicability of GWAS of human aging, health, and longevity related traits.

Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2016.00188

Loading...

I stumbled upon an interesting open access paper a few days ago, linked below, in which the authors present their view of immunosenescence, the age-related failure of the immune system, as being in part a process wherein some cells of the adaptive immune system change their characteristics and function to become more like innate immune system cells. It makes for interesting reading, though it is worth bearing in mind that the immune system as a whole is fantastically complex, and in many ways still a dark and unmapped forest. It is easy to theorize unopposed when there is such a lot of empty space remaining on the map, making it hard to argue concretely about the relative importance of various mechanisms and observations. This poor understanding of the intricacies of the immune system is why autoimmune diseases and immune aging are largely lacking in effective treatments, and why the best of the prospective cures are those that sidestep the entire question of specific causes and mechanisms in face of the Gordian strategy of destroying the entire immune system in order to start over with new stem cells and immune cells.

As you might know, the immune system of most higher animals is two-layered. The layer that evolved first, and which remains the entirety of the immune system in lower animals such as insects, is known as the innate immune system. It reacts quickly, generates inflammation, and reacts in the same, predictable way to every threat. It has no memory and does not reconfigure its operations in response to circumstances and history. Later in evolutionary history, a second layer known as the adaptive immune system came into being, a more sophisticated set of functions resting on top of the existing innate mechanisms. The innate immune system reacts to intruders, and then the adaptive immune system records the nature of the threat and responds in its own manner, augmenting the attack. As the name suggests, the adaptive immune system maintains a memory and adjusts its operations in order to more aggressively destroy pathogens that it has encountered in the past. As anyone in the field will tell you, however, this high level picture of cleanly divided dualism is overly simplistic, however. There are numerous grey areas and incompletely understood complexities at the border between the two sides of the immune system.

Given that the adaptive immune system can adapt, its failure with aging is in large part a matter of acquired misconfiguration. There is only a small influx of new immune cells in adults, and this puts an effective limit on the number of immune cells that is supported at any one time. The inevitable problem in a space-limited system that keeps a continual record of history is that it runs out of space: evolutionary pressures produced the trade-off of a system that works very well out of the gate in young people, but fails sometime in later life. An old adaptive immune system is burdened with too many cells devoted to memory and too few cells devoted to attacking new threats. That is on top of the progressive failures that occur due to the the growing burden of the molecular damage that accompanies aging: persistent metabolic waste products such as cross-links and lipofuscin, mitochondrial damage, diminished stem cell activity, and so forth. The innate immune system has its own problems that arise from this damage, but is less prone of the issue of misconfiguration.

Understanding exactly how aging progressively harms the intricate choreography of the immune response is a massive project, and nowhere near completion. It is possible to judge how far along researchers are in this work by the side effect of the quality of therapies for autoimmune disease, which are malfunctions in immune configuration, and largely incurable at the present time. From a practical point of view, and as mentioned above, the best prospects for effective treatments in the near future involve destroying and recreating the immune system. That works around our comparative ignorance by removing all of the problems that researchers don't understand in addition to ones that they do. Destroying the immune system can only be done with chemotherapy at the moment, which no-one would undergo unless there was no choice in the matter given that it has significant negative effects on long-term health, but once new methods of selective immune cell destruction are developed, lacking side-effects, then we can start to talk about treating immune aging by rebooting the immune system.

Convergence of Innate and Adaptive Immunity during Human Aging

Aging is associated with a general decline in immune function, contributing to a higher risk of infection, cancer, and autoimmune diseases in the elderly. Such faulty immune responses are the result of a profound remodeling of the immune system that occurs with age, generally termed as immunosenescence. While the number of nave T cells emerging from the thymus progressively decreases with age as a result of thymic involution, the memory T cell pool expands and exhibits significant changes in the phenotype and function of antigen-experienced T cells, particularly evident in the CD8+ T cell compartment. Chronic immune activation due to persistent viral infections, such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), is one of the main drivers contributing to the accumulation of highly differentiated antigen-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes that have characteristics of replicative senescence. In combination with the depletion of the peripheral pool of nave T cells, the accumulation of these terminally differentiated T cells with age skews the immune repertoire and has been implicated in the impaired immune responses to new antigens and vaccination in the elderly

Natural killer cells and CD8+ T lymphocytes are the two major cell lineages with constitutive cytotoxic activity and have a crucial role in the recognition and killing of abnormal cells. However, the paradigm for the recognition of target cells is fundamentally different between these two cell types: conventional CD8+ T cells rely on the T cell receptor (TCR) to recognize specific peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex class-I (MHC-I) molecules, whereas NK cells use a repertoire of germ line-encoded receptors to detect "missing self" or "altered-self" antigens and directly kill abnormal cells, without prior sensitization. Besides antigen specificity, the development of immunological memory is conventionally another distinctive feature between NK and T cells, categorizing them into distinct arms of the immune system and the innate and adaptive immune system, respectively.

Nevertheless, accumulating evidence supports the existence of NK cell memory, as well as evidence for TCR-independent responses mediated by CD8+ T lymphocytes, suggesting that the conventional limits between the innate and adaptive arms of the immune system may be not as distinct as first thought. NK and T lymphocytes have a common origin from a lymphoid progenitor cell in the bone marrow, and recent comparative proteomic and transcriptomic studies have demonstrated a remarkably close proximity between effector CD8+ T lymphocytes and NK cells, reiterating an evolutionary ancestry and shared biology between the two cell lineages.

An increasing body of literature reveals the existence of subsets of T cells with features that bridge innate and adaptive immunity. These cells typically co-express a TCR and NK cell lineage markers, distinguishing them from NK cells and other innate lymphoid cells, which lack the expression of a TCR or somatically rearranged receptors. Functionally, innate-like T cells respond to TCR ligation but are also able to respond rapidly to danger signals and pro-inflammatory cytokines, independently of TCR stimulation, resembling innate cells. Recently, subsets of conventional CD8+ T cells expressing NK cell markers and intraepithelial T cells have been included in this vaguely defined group of innate-like T cells. Despite the similarities in phenotype and function, there are clear differences in ontogeny and tissue distribution between them.

In this review, we will discuss recent evidence that aging is associated with the expansion of a subset of conventional CD8+ T cells with phenotypic, functional, and transcriptomic features that resemble NK cells. Such innate-like CD8+ T cells have the characteristics of terminally differentiated T cells, and the acquisition of functional NK receptors is most likely part of a general reprograming of the CD8+ T cell compartment during human aging, to ensure broad and rapid effector functions. We propose that innate-like CD8+ T cells share important features with other innate-like T cells; however, fundamental differences in origin and development separate them from truly innate cells. Interestingly, these cells are also differentially affected by aging, suggesting distinct roles in immune responses at different times of life. Evidence indicates that chronological aging is associated with accumulation of cells combining features of both the innate and adaptive arms of the immune system, most likely to compensate for functional defects of conventional NK and CD8+ T cells with age. We propose that senescent CD8+ T cells should not be seen as a dysfunctional population but instead a functionally distinct subset, which uses recently acquired NK cell machinery to maintain rapid effector functions throughout life. Contrary to the classic paradigm that peripheral TCR ligation is essential for T cell activation, this subset of highly differentiated T cells has impaired TCR responsiveness and may be non-specifically activated by inflammatory cytokines or after ligation of innate receptors. The switch to an innate mode of function may shed light on the mechanisms that allow highly differentiated CD8+ T cells to maintain functionality, despite the loss of TCR signal functions.

Our understanding of the physiological significance of the expression of NKRs on T cells is still incomplete, and the identification of the molecular mechanisms and the transcriptional regulators underpinning the development of innate features in T cells is essential. Most importantly, it will be important to understand how the intersection between innate and adaptive immune features may be manipulated to enhance immune function and to use this information to develop new approaches to improve immunity in the elderly.

Loading...

There are many possible answers to the question of why women have a longer life expectancy than men, but no real consensus on which of the candidate mechanisms are the important ones. It is interesting to note that, in an age in which rejuvenation therapies are starting to arrive, the research community has a better idea of how to bring aging under medical control, and thus make natural variations in longevity irrelevant, than of how to definitively determine the mechanisms causing those natural variations between groups of humans. Fully understanding our biochemistry is a massive undertaking, far greater in scope than merely wrestling degenerative aging into submission by addressing its root causes. Biology is enormously complex, and working with statistical demographic data or evolutionary theory doesn't tend to produce firm answers, only helping to narrow down the directions for further inquiry.

People worldwide are living longer, healthier lives. A new study of mortality patterns in humans, monkeys and apes suggests that the last few generations of humans have enjoyed the biggest life expectancy boost in primate history. The gains are partly due to advances in medicine and public health that have increased the odds of survival for human infants and reduced the death toll from childhood illness. Yet males still lag behind females - not just in humans but across the primate family tree, the researchers find. "The male disadvantage has deep evolutionary roots."

An international team compiled records of births and deaths for more than a million people worldwide, from the 18th century to the present. The data included people in post-industrial societies such as Sweden and Japan, people born in pre-industrial times, and modern hunter-gatherers, who provide a baseline for how long people might have lived before supermarkets and modern medicine. The researchers combined these measurements with similar data for six species of wild primates that have been studied continuously for three to five decades, including sifaka lemurs, muriqui monkeys, capuchins, baboons, chimpanzees and gorillas. The data confirm a growing body of research suggesting that humans are making more rapid and dramatic gains than ever before seen in the primate family tree. For example, in the last 200 years life expectancy in Sweden has jumped from the mid-30s to over 80, meaning that a baby born today can hope to live more than twice as long as one born in the early 19th century. The data show that today's longest-lived human populations have a similar 40- to 50-year advantage over people who live traditional lifestyles, such as the Hadza hunter-gatherers of Tanzania and the Ach people of Paraguay.

In contrast, these modern hunter-gatherers - the best lens we have into the lives of early humans - live on average just 10 to 20 years longer than wild primates such as muriquis or chimpanzees, from which human ancestors diverged millions of years ago. "We've made a bigger journey in lengthening our lifespan over the last few hundred years than we did over millions of years of evolutionary history." One indicator of healthcare improvement is infant mortality, which strikes fewer than 3 in 1000 babies born in Sweden or Japan today. But it was more than 40 times higher for those born two centuries ago, and is still high among hunter-gatherers and wild primates.

The researchers also studied lifespan equality, a measure similar to income equality that indicates whether longevity is distributed evenly across society, or only enjoyed by a few. They found that, for both humans and wild primates, every gain in average lifespan is accompanied by a gain in lifespan equality. That is, for a population to be very long-lived, everyone must benefit more or less equally, with fewer individuals left behind. The researchers were surprised to find that the longevity of human males has yet to catch up with females, and the improvements in males aren't spread as evenly. A girl born in Sweden in the early 1800s could expect to outlive her male counterparts by an average of three to four years. Two hundred years later, despite Swedes adding 45 years to their average lifespan, the gulf that separates the sexes has barely budged. The life expectancy gender gap isn't just true for humans. Females outlived males in almost every wild primate population they looked at.

Link: https://today.duke.edu/2016/11/life-expectancy-grows-men-still-lagging

Loading...

In the field of tissue engineering, this is the era of organoids. Researchers are limited in the size of tissue they can produce because of the lack of a robust method of generating the blood vessel networks needed to support large tissue sections, but are otherwise making significant progress in the generation of functional organ tissue. Initially this is producing the greatest benefit for further research and development, allowing tests to be conducted in living tissue at a much faster pace and lower cost. For many tissue types, however, organoids also offer the possibility of benefits realized through transplantation, as in many cases they are capable of integrating with existing organ tissue to improve its function.

Scientists report using human pluripotent stem cells to grow human intestinal tissues that have functioning nerves in a laboratory. The paper puts medical science a step closer to using human pluripotent stem cells (which can become any cell type in the body) for regenerative medicine and growing patient-specific human intestine for transplant. "One day this technology will allow us to grow a section of healthy intestine for transplant into a patient, but the ability to use it now to test and ask countless new questions will help human health to the greatest extent." This ability starts with being able to model and study intestinal disorders in functioning, three-dimensional human organ tissue with genetically-specific patient cells. The technology will also allow researchers to test new therapeutics in functioning lab-engineered human intestine before clinical trials in patients.

Researchers started out by subjecting human pluripotent stem cells to a biochemical bath that triggers their formation into human intestinal tissue in a petri dish. The process was essentially the same as that used in a 2010 study, which reported the first-ever generation of three-dimensional human intestinal organoids in a laboratory. Intestinal tissues from the initial study lacked an enteric nervous system, which is critical to the movement of waste through the digestive tract and the absorption of nutrients. The gastrointestinal tract contains the second largest number of nerves in the human body. When these nerves fail to work properly it hinders the contraction of intestinal muscles. To engineer a nervous system for the intestinal organoids already growing in one petri dish, researchers generated embryonic-stage nerve cells called neural crest cells in a separate dish. The neural crest cells were manipulated to form precursor cells for enteric nerves. The challenge at this stage was identifying how and when to incorporate the neural crest cells into the developing intestine. "We tried a few different approaches largely based on the hypothesis that, if you put the right cells together at the right time in the petri dish, they'll know what do to. It was a long shot, but it worked." The appropriate mix caused enteric nerve precursor cells and intestines to grow together in a manner resembling developing fetal intestine.

A key test for the engineered intestines and nerves was transplanting them into a living organism - in this case laboratory mice with suppressed immune systems. This allowed researchers to see how well the tissues grow and function. Study data show the tissues work and are structured in a manner remarkably similar to natural human intestine. They grow robustly, process nutrients and demonstrate peristalsis - series of wave-like muscle contractions that in the body move food through the digestive tract.

Link: https://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/news/release/2016/hirschsprungs-intestinal-nerve-disorder

Loading...

The first rejuvenation therapies to work well enough to merit the name will be based on the SENS vision: that aging is at root caused by a few classes of accumulated cell and tissue damage, and biotechnologies that either repair that damage or render it irrelevant will as a result produce rejuvenation. Until very recently, no medical technology could achieve this goal, and few research groups were even aiming for that outcome. We are in the midst of a grand transition, however, in which the research and development community is finally turning its attention to the causes of aging, understanding that this is the only way to effectively treat and cure age-related disease. Age-related diseases are age-related precisely because they are caused by the same processes of damage that cause aging: the only distinctions between aging and disease are the names given to various collections of symptoms. All of frailty, disease, weakness, pain, and suffering in aging is the result of accumulated damage at the level of cells and protein machinery inside those cells. Once the medical community becomes firmly set on the goal of repairing that damage, we'll be well on the way to controlling and managing aging as a chronic condition - preventing it from causing harm to the patient by periodically repairing and removing its causes before they rise to the level of producing symptoms and dysfunction. The therapies of the future will be very different from the therapies of the past.

The full rejuvenation toolkit of the next few decades will consist of a range of different treatments, each targeting a different type of molecular damage in cells and tissues. In this post, I'll take a look at the likely order of arrival of some of these therapies, based on what is presently going on in research, funding, and for-profit development. This is an update to a similar post written four years ago, now become somewhat dated given recent advances in the field. Circumstances change, and considerable progress has been made in some lines of research and development.

1) Clearance of Senescent Cells

It didn't take much of a crystal ball four years ago to put senescent cell clearance in first place, the most likely therapy to arrive first. All of the pieces of the puzzle were largely in place at that time: the demonstration of benefits in mice; potential means of clearance; interested research groups. Only comparatively minor details needed filling in. Four years later no crystal ball is required at all, given that Everon Biosciences, Oisin Biotechnologies, SIWA Therapeutics, and UNITY Biotechnology are all forging ahead with various different approaches to the selective destruction of senescent cells. No doubt many groups within established Big Pharma entities are also taking a stab at this, more quietly, and with less press attention. UNITY Biotechnology has raised more than $100 million to date, demonstrating that there is broad enthusiasm for this approach to the treatment of aging and age-related disease.

With the additional attention and funding for this field, more methods of selective cell destruction have been established, and there is now a greater and more detailed understanding of the ways in which senescent cells cause harm, contributing to the aging process. Senolytic drugs that induce apoptosis have been discovered; senescent cells are primed to enter the programmed cell death process of apoptosis, and so a small nudge to all cells via a drug treatment kills many senescent cells but very few normal cells. Researchers have established that senescent cells exist in the immune system, and may be important in immune aging. Similarly, the immune cells involved in the progression of atherosclerosis are also senescent, and removing them slows the progression of that condition. Other research has shown that removing senescent cells from the lungs restores lost tissue elasticity and improves lung function. Beyond these specific details, senescent cells clearly contribute to chronic inflammation in aging, and that drives the progression of near all common age-related conditions. The less inflammation the better. These effects are caused by the signals secreted by senescent cells: that their harm is based on signaling explains how a small number of these cells, perhaps 1% by number in an aged organ, can cause such widespread havoc.

2) Immune System Destruction and Restoration

At the present time it is a challenge to pick second place. A number of fields are all equally close to realization, and happenstance in funding decisions, regulatory matters, or technical details yet to be uncovered will make the difference. The destruction and recreation of the immune system wins out because it is already possible, already demonstrated to be successful, and just missing one component part that would enable it to be used by ordinary, healthy, older people. At present researchers and clinicians use chemotherapy to destroy immune cells and the stem cells that create them. Repopulation of the immune system is carried out via cell transplants that are by now a safe and proven application of stem cell medicine, little different from the many varieties of first generation stem cell therapy. This approach has been used to cure people with multiple sclerosis, and has been attempted with varying degrees of success for a number of other autoimmune conditions for going on fifteen years now: there are researchers with a lot of experience in this type of therapy.

The catch here is that chemotherapy is a damaging experience. The cost of undergoing it is high, both immediately, and in terms of negative impact on later health and life expectancy, similar to that resulting from a life spent smoking. It only makes sense for people who are otherwise on their way to an early death or disability, as is the case for multiple sclerosis patients. However, there are a number of approaches very close to practical realization that will make chemotherapy obsolete for the selective destruction of immune cells and stem cells - approaches with minimal or no side-effects. A combined approach targeting c-kit and CD47 was demonstrated earlier this year, for example. Sophisticated cell targeting systems such as the gene therapy approach developed for senescent cell clearance by Oisin Biotechnologies could also be turned to stem cell or immune cell destruction, given suitable markers of cell chemistry. There are quite a few of these, any one of which would be good enough.

Replacing the chemotherapy with a safe, side-effect-free treatment would mean that the established programs for immune system restoration could immediately expand to become a useful, effective treatment for immunosenescence, the age-related failure of the immune system. This is in part a problem of configuration: a lifetime of exposure to persistent pathogens such as herpesviruses leaves too much of the immune system uselessly devoted to specific targets that it cannot effectively clear from the body, and too little left ready to fight new threats and destroy malfunctioning cells. Then there are various forms of autoimmunity that become prevalent in older people, not all of which are in any way fully understood - consider just how recently type 4 diabetes was discovered, for example. Clearing out the entire immune system, all of its memory and quirks, and restarting it fresh with a new supply of stem cells is a good approach to many of the issues in the aged immune system. Not all of them, but many of them, and considering the broad influence immune function has over many other aspects of health and tissue function, it seems a worthwhile goal.

3) Clearance of the First Few Types of Amyloid

There are about twenty different types of amyloid, misfolded proteins that form solid deposits. Not all are robustly associated with age-related dysfunction, but of those that are, some progress has been made towards effective therapies based on clearance. Last year, a clinical trial of transthyretin amyloid clearance produced good results. This type of amyloid is associated with heart disease, and is thought to be the primary cause of death in supercentenarians. This year researchers finally demonstrated clearance of amyloid- in humans, after a long series of failures. Amyloid- is one of the forms of metabolic waste that accumulates in Alzheimer's disease.

So these types of rejuvenation therapy already exist in the sense of prototypes and trial treatments. To the degree that they are effective and safe, everyone much over the age of 40 should be undergoing a course of treatment every few years. In practice, since both of the above mentioned therapies are tied up in the slow-moving edifice of Big Pharma regulatory capture, it will be a long time before they make it to the clinic in any way that is accessible to an ordinary individual. The most likely path to that goal is for other groups outside that system to reverse engineer the basic technology from the scientific publications, implement their own methodologies, and market it in other regulatory regions, making it available via medical tourism. This is how stem cell medicine progressed, and seems likely to be the way that any other very significant field will also move forward.

4) Clearance of Glucosepane Cross-Links

Clearance of cross-links in the extracellular matrix of tissues is, like senescent cell destruction, one of the most exciting of early rejuvenation therapies. It is a single target that influences a great many aspects of aging: if we look at just the cross-link-induced loss of elasticity in blood vessels alone, that has a major influence on mortality through hypertension and consequent impact on cardiovascular health. It is also a single target in the sense that near all persistent cross-links important to aging in humans so far appear to be based on one compound, glucosepane. Thus all that is needed is one drug candidate.

Four years ago, the situation for glucosepane clearance looked pretty bleak. The funding was minimal, and the tools for working with glucosepane in living tissues didn't exist. Researchers avoided the whole topic, as making any progress would require a lot of funding and effort to even get to the point of starting in earnest. The SENS Research Foundation and their allies have since made major inroads into this challenge, however. Last year, a method of cheaply and reliably synthesizing glucosepane was established, and now the road is open to anyone who wants to try their hand at drug discovery. That is now underway in the Spiegel Lab, among others, and I'd hope to see the first potential drug candidates emerge at some point in the next couple of years.

5) Thymic Rejuvenation to Increase the Supply of Immune Cells

Another possible approach to partially restore lost function in the aging immune system is to increase the pace at which new immune cells are created. This is a very slow pace indeed in older people, due in large part to the age-related decline of the thymus. The thymus acts as a nursery for the maturation of T cells, and its atrophy thus restricts the rate at which new cells enter circulation. There has been some progress towards engineering of replacement active thymus tissue, as well as methods of providing signal proteins that instruct the old thymus to regenerate and begin to act in a more youthful manner. Transplants of young thymus organs into old mice has demonstrated that this class of approach can produce a meaningful improvement in immune function, and thereby extend healthy life. This is one of a number of regenerative approaches that is on the verge, just waiting for someone to start a company or join the final two dots together and get moving.

6) Mitochondrial Repair

Mitochondria, the power plants of the cell, are herds of bacteria-like organelles that bear their own DNA. This DNA becomes damaged in the course of normal cellular processes, and certain forms of mitochondrial DNA damage - to the thirteen genes needed for oxidative phosphorylation - produce malfunctioning mitochondria that can overtake their cells, either by replicating more readily or being more resistant to quality control mechanisms. Such cells become dysfunctional exporters of harmful signals and oxidized proteins, something that contributes to the progression of atherosclerosis via increased amounts of oxidized lipids in the bloodstream, to pick one example. If we're lucky, a substantial proportion of these cells will become senescent as a result of their mutant mitochondria, and will thus be destroyed by senescent cell clearance therapies. Regardless of whether or not that is true, a method of either repairing or working around this type of damage is needed.

Most of the possible approaches may or may not work well, because of the replication advantage that damaged mitochondria have over normal mitochondria, and are still to be tested in practice rather than theory or demonstration: upregulation of existing repair mechanisms; delivery of extra functional mitochondrial DNA or whole mitochondria; and so forth. The SENS approach is somewhat more radical, involving gene therapy to introduce copies of the thirteen genes into the cell nucleus, altered to ensure that the proteins produced can migrate back to the mitochondria where they are needed. Mitochondria will thus have the necessary protein machinery for correct function regardless of the state of their DNA. This has been demonstrated for three of the thirteen genes of interest, numbers two and three just this year, and getting that far has taken the better part of ten years at a low level of funding. It is likely that things will go faster in the future, now that there is a for-profit company, Gensight Biologics working on the problem in addition to non-profit groups, but it is still the case that the bulk of the work remains to be done.

Will it be useful to have therapies that fix half the problem, moving six or seven genes to the cell nucleus? Will that reduce the impact on aging by half? Hard to say until it is done and demonstrated in mice. Halfway there is probably a target reached by 2020 or so at the present pace. Mitochondrial function appears from all the evidence to be an important aspect of aging, so it is to my eyes worth trying at the halfway point to see what the outcome is.

7) A Robust Cure for Cancer

Some might find it counterintuitive that a universal cure for cancer is not last in this list. We've all been educated to think of cancer as the greatest challenge for medical science, the problem to be solved last of all. Nonetheless, a more rapid arrival of a generally applicable cure for cancer looks to be the likely course of events, as the basis for a treatment that can in principle put a halt to all cancer at all stages of development is currently in the earliest stages of development. All cancers depend absolutely on the ability to continually lengthen telomeres, and so avoid the Hayflick limit on cell replication. Telomere lengthening occurs through the activity of telomerase or the less well understood alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) mechanisms: these two are a small set of targets for modern medicine, and researchers are working on the challenge. If telomerase and ALT can both be blocked, temporarily and either globally throughout the body or selectively in cancerous tissue, then cancer will wither and become controllable. This is too fundamental a part of cellular biochemistry for the rapid mutational evolution of cancer cells to work around, as they can for many of the standard approaches to cancer treatment at the present time. Stem cell populations will suffer while telomerase activity is blocked, as they require telomere lengthening for self-renewal, but that is a lesser problem when compared to cancer and one that the stem cell research community will become increasingly able to address in the years ahead.

8) Reversing Stem Cell Aging

The stem cell industry is massively funded, and is on a collision course with stem cell aging. Most of the conditions that one would want to use stem cell therapies to treat are age-related conditions. Researchers must thus ensure that the altered cellular environment, the damage of aging, doesn't prevent the treatments from working - that pristine cells can integrate and work well, not immediately die or decline in response to an age-damaged stem cell niche. On the whole, the research community isn't engaging aggressively with this goal, however. Possible reasons for this include the fact that most stem cell treatments, even without addressing issues of the aged tissue environment, represent a considerable improvement in the scope of what is possible to achieve through modern medicine. So the incentive to go further is perhaps not as strong as it might otherwise be.

Stem cell populations become damaged by age, falling into quiescence or declining in overall numbers. They should be replaced with new populations, but while simple in concept, and even achieved for some cell types, such as the blood stem cells that produce immune cells, this is easier said than done for the body as a whole. Every tissue type is its own special case. There are hundreds of types of cell in the body. Each supporting stem cell population has so far required specific methodologies to be developed, and specific behaviors and biochemistry to be laboriously mapped. It isn't even entirely clear that researchers have found all of the stem cell or stem-like cell populations of interest. There is an enormous amount of work to be done here, and at the moment the field is still largely in the phase of getting the basics, the maps, and the reliable therapeutic methods sorted out for a few of the better understood tissue types, bone marrow and muscles in particular. So this seems at the present time like a long-term prospect, despite the high levels of funding for this line of medical research and development.

9) Clearance of Other Amyloids, Aggregates, and Sundry Lysosomal Garbage

A good portion of aging is driven by the accumulation of waste products, either because they are hard for our biochemistry to break down, is the case for glucosepane cross-links and many of the components of lipofuscin that degrade lysosomal function in long-lived cells, or because clearance systems fail over time, as appears likely to be the case for the amyloid- involved in Alzheimer's disease. There are a lot of these compounds: a score of amyloids, any number of lipofuscin constituents, the altered tau that shows up in tauopathies, and so on and so forth. In many cases there isn't even a good defensible link between a specific waste compound and specific age-related diseases: the waste is one contribution buried in many contributions, and the research community won't start putting numbers to relative importance until it is possible to clear out these contributions one by one and observe the results.

A range of research groups are picking away at individual forms of waste, some with large amounts of funding, some with very little funding, but this is a similar situation to that I outlined above for stem cell aging. There is a huge amount of work to accomplish because there are many targets to address, and with few exceptions, such as amyloid-, it is unclear which of the targets are the most important. They will all have to be addressed, in some order, but there are only so many researchers and only so much funding. We can hope that as the first effective therapies make it into the clinic, most likely for the clearance of forms of amyloid, there will be a growing enthusiasm for work on ways to remove other types of metabolic waste.

Loading...

The big question in the study of the comparative biology of regeneration is the degree to which mammals retain the mechanisms needed for the exceptional regeneration found in species such as zebrafish and salamanders. The individuals of these highly regenerative species are capable of regrowing fins, limbs, and major portions of internal organs. Has evolution removed this machinery from mammals, or only buried it, leaving it dormant and awaiting activation? This experiment, in which the molecular signals provided via transplanted extracellular matrix material from zebrafish are shown to enhance heart regeneration in mice, argues for the latter theory. The heart in mammals is among the least regenerative of tissues, and does not recover well from damage, but there is considerable room for improvement in the healing processes for all mammalian tissues. Zebrafish and other highly regenerative species heal without scars and without loss of function, something that cannot be said for mammals.

Many lower forms of life on earth exhibit an extraordinary ability to regenerate tissue, limbs, and even organs - a skill that is lost among humans and other mammals. Now, researchers have used the components of the cellular "scaffolding" of a zebrafish to regenerate heart tissues in mammals, specifically mice, as well as exhibiting promising results in human heart cells in vitro. The researchers found that a single administration of extracellular matrix (ECM) material from zebrafish hearts restored the function of the heart and regenerated adult mouse heart tissues after acute myocardial infarction. The study also found that the zebrafish ECM protected human cardiac myocytes - specialized cells that form heart muscle - from stresses.

ECM are the architectural foundations of tissues and organs; not only do they provide a "scaffolding" on which cells can grow and migrate, they assist in the signaling necessary for the organ to develop, grow, or regenerate. In mammals, the heart quickly loses the ability to regenerate after the organism is born, except for a brief period after birth. In lower animals, such as zebrafish, the heart retains that ability throughout their lives: up to 20 percent of a zebrafish's heart can be damaged or removed, and within days the heart's capacity has been fully restored. The researchers first separated the ECM from the cells so that the recipient heart would not reject the treatment. They did this by freezing the zebrafish cardiac tissue, causing the cell membranes to burst and allowing the researchers to retrieve the ECM, a process called decellularization. They then injected the ECM into the hearts of mice with damaged heart muscles and watched the hearts repair themselves. It is difficult to inject foreign cells into a body because the body will recognize them as foreign and reject them. That's not the case with ECM because it is composed of collagen, elastin, carbohydrates and signaling molecules and has no cell surface markers, DNA or RNA from the donor, and so the recipient is less likely to reject the treatment.

Restored function starts almost immediately, and healing is noticeable as early as five days after treatment; within a week, his team could see the heart beating more strongly than the hearts of the untreated animals. The researchers tested the effectiveness of ECM from normal zebrafish and from zebrafish with damaged hearts, in which the ECM had already begun the healing process. They found that while both types of ECM were effective in repairing damage to the mice hearts, the ECM obtained from the zebrafish hearts that were healing were even more potent in restoring heart function in the mice. The researchers are now working on a process to regenerate nerves in mammals using the same process and hope to expand the heart treatments to larger animals in a future study.

Link: http://www.news.pitt.edu/news/how-do-you-mend-broken-heart

Loading...

Heterochronic parabiosis involves joining the circulatory systems of an old and a young mouse. This produces harmful effects on the young mouse and beneficial effects on the old mouse. There is considerable interest in the research community in identifying the molecular signals involved. So far theory has focused on delivery of beneficial signals from young blood to the old individual, but here researchers present evidence to suggest it may be more a matter of diluting detrimental signals present in the old blood. This has implications for efforts to build therapies based on transfusions of young blood: if dilution is the primary mechanism, those efforts will have little to no effect.

A new study found that tissue health and repair dramatically decline in young mice when half of their blood is replaced with blood from old mice. The study argues against the rejuvenating properties of young blood and points to old blood, or molecules within, as driving the aging process. "Our study suggests that young blood by itself will not work as effective medicine. It's more accurate to say that there are inhibitors in old blood that we need to target to reverse aging." In 2005, researchers found evidence for tissue rejuvenation in older mice when they are surgically joined to younger mice so that blood is exchanged between the two. Despite remaining questions about the mechanism underlying this rejuvenation, media coverage of the study fixated on the potential of young blood to reverse the aging process, and on comparisons to vampires, which was not the takeaway from the study. In the years since the 2005 study, scientists have spent millions to investigate the potential medical properties of youthful blood with enterprises emerging to infuse old people with young blood. "What we showed in 2005 was evidence that aging is reversible and is not set in stone. Under no circumstances were we saying that infusions of young blood into elderly is medicine."

While the experimental model used in the 2005 study found evidence that some aspects of aging may be reversed, the techniques used in the study do not allow scientists to precisely control the exchange of blood, which is necessary to dig deeper into blood's effect on aging. When two mice are sutured together, a technique called parabiosis, blood is not the only thing that is exchanged in this setup; organs are also shared, so old mice get access to younger lungs, thymus-immune system, heart, liver and kidneys. In surgical suturing it takes weeks to a month for the effects of blood to take place and the precise timing is not actually known. Nor is the precise amount of the exchanged blood. In the new study, researchers developed an experimental technique to exchange blood between mice without joining them so that scientists can control blood circulation and conduct precise measurements on how old mice respond to young blood, and vice versa. In the new system, mice are connected and disconnected at will, removing the influence of shared organs or of any adaptation to being joined. One of the more surprising discoveries of this study was the very quick onset of the effects of blood on the health and repair of multiple tissues, including muscle, liver and brain. The effects were seen around 24 hours after exchange.

With the new experimental setup, the research team repeated the experiments from 2005. In each test, blood was exchanged between an old mouse and a young mouse until each mouse had half its blood from the other. The researchers then tested various indicators of aging in each mouse, such as liver cell growth as well as liver fibrosis and adiposity (fat), brain cell development in the region that is needed for learning and memory, muscle strength and muscle tissue repair. In many of these experiments, older mice that received younger blood saw either slight or no significant improvements compared to old mice with old blood. Young mice that received older blood, however, saw large declines in most of these tissues or organs. The most telling data was found when researchers tested blood's impact on new neuron production in the area of the brain where memory and learning are formed. In these experiments, older mice showed no significant improvement in brain neuron stem cells after receiving younger blood, but younger mice that received older blood saw a more than twofold drop in brain cell development compared to normal young mice. The researchers think that many benefits seen in old mice after receiving young blood might be due to the young blood diluting the concentration of inhibitors in the old blood.

Link: http://news.berkeley.edu/2016/11/22/young-blood-does-not-reverse-aging-in-old-mice-uc-berkeley-study-finds/

Loading...

Cryonics is the low-temperature preservation of at least the brain following death, leaving open the possibility of restoration to life in a future in which molecular nanotechnology and total control of cellular biochemistry are mature industries. As individuals, each of us is the data of the mind, no more, no less, and that data is stored in the form of fine physical structures, most likely those of the synapses connecting neurons. If that structure is preserved sufficiently well, then the individual is not yet gone - only ceased for the moment. Early cryopreservations involved straight freezing to liquid nitrogen temperatures, and this likely caused great damage to the structures of the brain due to ice crystal formation. Modern cryopreservations use cryoprotectants and staged cooling to achieve vitrification of tissues with minimal ice crystal formation. There the degree of damage is much reduced, contingent on sufficient perfusion of cryoprotectant and the quality of the other aspects of the process. These technologies are also under development by groups in the organ transplantation and tissue engineering communities: reversible vitrification of organs would solve a great many logistical problems. From the present state of the science, that goal isn't very far distant. Proof of concept vitrification, thawing, and transplantation of mammalian organs has taken place in the laboratory. Even without present reversibility, however, the merits of cryonics stand: people who are preserved are not dead and gone, just dead, with a chance to return. A chance of unknown size, yes, but that is a big improvement over the grave and certain oblivion.

Cryonics suffers from being a small industry. People encountering the concept for the first time tend look at it askance because it is a small community and thus not the usual end of life choice. Then they make up reasons in their own minds as to why it won't work, or is stupid, or illogical, or otherwise wrong, simply because it is not the norm. It takes multiple exposures to a topic for most people to come around and actually engage with what is known rather than with their own knee-jerk reaction to the topic. In the normal run of things, however, few people actually encounter the ideas of cryonics; it doesn't get all that much press, and since it is such a small industry and surrounding community, few people encounter those involved as they make their way through life. Thus public awareness and understanding of the long-standing cryonics industry seems to advance by a series of infrequent great leaps rather than ongoing incremental gains, each such leap driven by the high-profile cryopreservation of a sympathetic or noted individual that attracts a short-lived mob of press attention. First there is a flood of commentary from those who know next to nothing of cryonics and are quick to condemn it for being different, then a following wave of more thoughtful commentary, for and against, and finally some few of the many people who read the coverage choose to dig further, peruse some of the mountain of literature written on cryonics over the past 40 years, and conclude that cryonics does make sense and is a good idea. So the community of supporters and those signed up as members of a cryonics organization grows a little.

The latest leap forward was spurred by the cryopreservation of a terminally ill young lady in the UK, unusual for its surrounding legal case regarding consent and self-determination. The UK has a cryonics support organization, as is the case for many countries, but like most parts of the world lacks a cryonics provider. This may be why so much of the initial commentary has been from those fairly new to the idea, and has been unusually hostile in tone when compared to the media attention of the past five years or so. Being the UK, there is also a considerable focus on regulation, since the bias over there, in the media at least, is very much towards the idea that nothing must ever happen without government involvement - all that is not explicitly allowed is forbidden, any new endeavor must be quickly regulated by a new government office, and so forth. Sadly the US has been heading in that direction quite energetically since the turn of the century; it has been a sad thing to watch taking place. Cultural differences aside, many cryopreservations are carried out under difficult circumstances, and this was one of them. The ideal preservation takes place at the cryonics provider location, or very close by, within a known window of time, and cooldown is rapid following death so as to minimize damage. Departures from that ideal have a cost, both monetary and in the quality of the preservation, but the people involved here by all accounts did the best possible under the circumstances, hampered by the existing regulatory environment that prevents near every possible approach that could make things easier, cheaper, and more reliable.

Below find a very small selection of the recent attention given to this case. There is a lot more out there, if you are interested enough to go looking, ranging from ignorant and hostile to thoughtful and considered. The incorrect term "cryogenics" is bandied around, as is the mistaken idea that cryopreservation involves freezing: the press is ever haphazard when it comes to accuracy, and it doesn't become much better if you glance at what the wisdom of the crowds produced at social news sites in this case. Ultimately this matter, just as any cryopreservation, boils down to issues of self-determination and responsibility for the self. Sadly this is a topic that many members of our society, and especially those in the media and positions of power, seem to find offensive and undesirable: the idea that people can make decisions for themselves, and that those decisions should be respected. But we live in a world in which there is no choice so personal that it will not be interfered with by regulators and lawmakers, and that seems true whether or not the individual is young enough to be considered by those with power effectively the property of his or her parents. (Which is an entirely different iniquity in and of itself). As adults with a lifetime of experience people have just as much trouble in matters of self-determination at the end of life. Witness the political and legal battles over euthanasia, for example, in which childhood is extended indefinitely and the uncaring minions of the state take on the role of distant and forbidding parents. How free are we, really, when it is declared illegal to decide on matters of our own bodies and our own lives, and those who help will be jailed for the crime of compassionate if they are found out?

14-year-old girl who died of cancer wins right to be cryogenically frozen

A 14-year-old girl who said before dying of cancer that she wanted a chance to live longer has been allowed by the high court to have her body cryogenically frozen in the hope that she can be brought back to life at a later time. The court ruled that the teenager's mother, who supported the girl's wish to be cryogenically preserved, should be the only person allowed to make decisions about the disposal of her body. Her estranged father had initially opposed her wishes. During the last months of her life, the teenager, who had a rare form of cancer, used the internet to investigate cryonics. She sent a letter to the court: "I have been asked to explain why I want this unusual thing done. I'm only 14 years old and I don't want to die, but I know I am going to. I think being cryo-preserved gives me a chance to be cured and woken up, even in hundreds of years' time. I don't want to be buried underground. I want to live and live longer and I think that in the future they might find a cure for my cancer and wake me up. I want to have this chance. This is my wish."

The judge wrote: "I was moved by the valiant way in which she was facing her predicament. The scientific theory underlying cryonics is speculative and controversial, and there is considerable debate about its ethical implications. On the other hand, cryopreservation, the preservation of cells and tissues by freezing, is now a well-known process in certain branches of medicine, for example the preservation of sperm and embryos as part of fertility treatment. Cryonics is cryopreservation taken to its extreme." The judge said the girl's family was not well off but that her mother's parents had raised the money. A voluntary UK group of cryonics enthusiasts, who were not medically trained, had offered to help make arrangements. Co-operation of a hospital was required. The hospital trust in the case was willing to help although it stressed it was not endorsing cryonics. "On the contrary, all the professionals feel deep unease about it," the judge said.

The Human Tissue Authority (HTA), which regulates organisations which remove, store and use human tissue, had been consulted but said it had no remit to intervene in such a case. "The HTA would be likely to make representations that activities of the present kind should be brought within the regulatory framework if they showed signs of increasing," the judge said. The HTA said: "We are gathering information about cryopreservation to determine how widespread it is currently, or could become in the future, and any risks it may pose to the individual, or public confidence more broadly. We are in discussion with key stakeholders on the possible need for regulatory oversight." The government may need to intervene in future, the judge said: "It may be that events in this case suggest the need for proper regulation of cryonic preservation in this country if it is to happen in future."

Cryonics debate: 'Many scientists are afraid to hurt their careers'

Read the rest here:
Fight Aging! Reports from the front line in the fight ...

Read More...

Aging of wine – Wikipedia

Wednesday, November 23rd, 2016

The aging of wine is potentially able to improve the quality of wine. This distinguishes wine from most other consumable goods. While wine is perishable and capable of deteriorating, complex chemical reactions involving a wine's sugars, acids and phenolic compounds (such as tannins) can alter the aroma, color, mouthfeel and taste of the wine in a way that may be more pleasing to the taster. The ability of a wine to age is influenced by many factors including grape variety, vintage, viticultural practices, wine region and winemaking style. The condition that the wine is kept in after bottling can also influence how well a wine ages and may require significant time and financial investment.[1][2] The quality of an aged wine varies significantly bottle-by-bottle, depending on the conditions under which it was stored, and the condition of the bottle and cork, and thus it is said that rather than good old vintages, there are good old bottles. There is a significant mystique around the aging of wine, as its chemistry was not understood for a long time, and old wines are often sold for extraordinary prices. However, the vast majority of wine is not aged, and even wine that is aged is rarely aged for long; it is estimated that 90% of wine is meant to be consumed within a year of production, and 99% of wine within 5 years.[3]

The Ancient Greeks and Romans were aware of the potential of aged wines. In Greece, early examples of dried "straw wines" were noted for their ability to age due to their high sugar contents. These wines were stored in sealed earthenware amphorae and kept for many years. In Rome, the most sought after winesFalernian and Surrentinewere prized for their ability to age for decades. In the Book of Luke, it is noted that "old wine" was valued over "new wine" (Luke 5:39). The Greek physician Galen wrote that the "taste" of aged wine was desirable and that this could be accomplished by heating or smoking the wine, though, in Galen's opinion, these artificially aged wines were not as healthy to consume as naturally aged wines.[4]

Following the Fall of the Roman Empire, appreciation for aged wine was virtually non-existent. Most of the wines produced in northern Europe were light bodied, pale in color and with low alcohol. These wines did not have much aging potential and barely lasted a few months before they rapidly deteriorated into vinegar. The older a wine got the cheaper its price became as merchants eagerly sought to rid themselves of aging wine. By the 16th century, sweeter and more alcoholic wines (like Malmsey and Sack) were being made in the Mediterranean and gaining attention for their aging ability. Similarly, Riesling from Germany with its combination of acidity and sugar were also demonstrating their ability to age. In the 17th century, two innovations occurred that radically changed the wine industry's view on aging. One was the development of the cork and bottle which allowed producers to package and store wine in a virtually air-tight environment. The second was the growing popularity of fortifying wines such as Port, Madeira and Sherries. The added alcohol was found to act as a preservative, allowing wines to survive long sea voyages to England, The Americas and the East Indies. The English, in particular, were growing in their appreciation of aged wines like Port and Claret from Bordeaux. Demand for matured wines had a pronounced effect on the wine trade. For producers, the cost and space of storing barrels or bottles of wine was prohibitive so a merchant class evolved with warehouses and the finances to facilitate aging wines for a longer period of time. In regions like Bordeaux, Oporto and Burgundy, this situation dramatically increased the balance of power towards the merchant classes.[4]

There is a widespread misconception that wine always improves with age,[3] or that wine improves with extended aging, or that aging potential is an indicator of good wine. Some authorities state that more wine is consumed too old than too young.[5] Aging changes wine, but does not categorically improve it or worsen it. Fruitness deteriorates rapidly, decreasing markedly after only 6 months in the bottle.[5] Due to the cost of storage, it is not economical to age cheap wines, but many varieties of wine do not benefit from aging, regardless of the quality. Experts vary on precise numbers, but typically state that only 510% of wine improves after 1 year, and only 1% improves after 510 years.[3][5]

In general, wines with a low pH (such as Pinot Noir and Sangiovese) have a greater capability of aging. With red wines, a high level of flavor compounds, such as phenolics (most notably tannins), will increase the likelihood that a wine will be able to age. Wines with high levels of phenols include Cabernet Sauvignon, Nebbiolo and Syrah.[4] The white wines with the longest aging potential tend to be those with a high amount of extract and acidity. The acidity in white wines, acting as a preservative, has a role similar to that of tannins in red wines. The process of making white wines, which includes little to no skin contact, means that white wines have a significantly lower amount of phenolic compounds, though barrel fermentation and oak aging can impart some phenols. Similarly, the minimal skin contact with ros wine limits their aging potential.[1][2][5]

After aging at the winery most wood-aged Ports, Sherries, Vins doux naturels, Vins de liqueur, basic level Ice wines and sparkling wines are bottled when the producer feels that they are ready to be consumed. These wines are ready to drink upon release and will not benefit much from aging. Vintage Ports and other bottled-aged Ports & Sherries will benefit from some additional aging.[4]

Champagne and other sparkling wines are infrequently aged, and frequently have no vintage year (no vintage, NV), but vintage champagne may be aged.[4] Aged champagne has traditionally been a peculiarly British affectation, and thus has been referred to as le got anglais "the English taste",[6] though this term also refers to a level of champagne sweetness. In principle champagne has aging potential, due to the acidity, and aged champagne has increased in popularity in the United States since the 1996 vintage.[7] A few French winemakers have advocated aging champagne, most notably Ren Collard (19212009).[8] In 2009, a 184-year-old bottle of Perrier-Jout was opened and tasted, still drinkable, with notes of "truffles and caramel", according to the experts.[9]

A guideline provided by Master of Wine Jancis Robinson[5]

A guideline provided by Master of Wine Jancis Robinson. Note that vintage, wine region and winemaking style can influence a wine's aging potential so Robinson's suggestion of years are very rough estimates of the most common examples of these wines.[5]

The ratio of sugars, acids and phenolics to water is a key determination of how well a wine can age. The less water in the grapes prior to harvest, the more likely the resulting wine will have some aging potential. Grape variety, climate, vintage and viticultural practice come into play here. Grape varieties with thicker skins, from a dry growing season where little irrigation was used and yields were kept low will have less water and a higher ratio of sugar, acids and phenolics. The process of making Eisweins, where water is removed from the grape during pressing as frozen ice crystals, has a similar effect of decreasing the amount of water and increasing aging potential.[2][5]

In winemaking, the duration of maceration or skin contact will influence how much phenolic compounds are leached from skins into the wine. Pigmented tannins, anthocyanins, colloids, tannin-polysaccharides and tannin-proteins not only influence a wine's resulting color but also act as preservatives. During fermentation adjustment to a wine's acid levels can be made with wines with lower pH having more aging potential. Exposure to oak either during fermentation or after (during barrel aging) will introduce more phenolic compounds to the wines. Prior to bottling, excessive fining or filtering of the wine could strip the wine of some phenolic solids and may lessen a wine's ability to age.[1][4]

The storage condition of the bottled wine will influence a wine's aging. Vibrations and heat fluctuations can hasten a wine's deterioration and cause adverse effect on the wines. In general, a wine has a greater potential to develop complexity and more aromatic bouquet if it is allowed to age slowly in a relatively cool environment. The lower the temperature, the more slowly a wine develops.[4] On average, the rate of chemical reactions in wine double with each 18F (8C) increase in temperature. Wine expert Karen MacNeil, recommends keeping wine intended for aging in a cool area with a constant temperature around 55F (13C). Wine can be stored at temperatures as high as 69F (20C) without long term negative effect. Professor Cornelius Ough of the University of California, Davis believes that wine could be exposed to temperatures as high as 120F (49C) for a few hours and not be damaged. However, most experts believe that extreme temperature fluctuations (such as repeated transferring a wine from a warm room to a cool refrigerator) would be detrimental to the wine. The ultra-violet rays of direct sunlight should also be avoided because of the free radicals that can develop in the wine and result in premature oxidation.[2][12]

Wines packaged in large format bottles, such as magnums and 3 liter Jeroboams, seem to age more slowly than wines packaged in regular 750 ml bottles or half bottles. This may be because of the greater proportion of oxygen exposed to the wine during the bottle process. The advent of alternative wine closures to cork, such as screw caps and synthetic corks have opened up recent discussions on the aging potential of wines sealed with these alternative closures. Currently there are no conclusive results and the topic is the subject of ongoing research.[1][4]

One of the short-term aging needs of wine is a period where the wine is considered "sick" due to the trauma and volatility of the bottling experience. During bottling the wine is exposed to some oxygen which causes a domino effect of chemical reactions with various components of the wine. The time it takes for the wine to settle down and have the oxygen fully dissolve and integrate with the wine is considered its period of "bottle shock". During this time the wine could taste drastically different from how it did prior to bottling or how it will taste after the wine has settled. While many modern bottling lines try to treat the wine as gently as possible and utilize inert gases to minimize the amount of oxygen exposure, all wine goes through some period of bottle shock. The length of this period will vary with each individual wine.[2][5]

The transfer of off-flavours in the cork used to bottle a wine during prolonged aging can be detrimental to the quality of the bottle. The formation of cork taint is a complex process which may result from a wide range of factors ranging from the growing conditions of the cork oak, the processing of the cork into stoppers, or the molds growing on the cork itself.[1][2]

During the course of aging, a wine may slip into a "dumb phase" where its aromas and flavors are very muted. In Bordeaux this phase is called the age ingrat or "difficult age" and is likened to a teenager going through adolescence. The cause or length of time that this "dumb phase" will last is not yet fully understood and seems to vary from bottle to bottle.[12]

As red wine ages, the harsh tannins of its youth gradually give way to a softer mouthfeel. An inky dark color will eventually lose its depth of color and begin to appear orange at the edges, and then later eventually turning brown. These changes occur due to the complex chemical reactions of the phenolic compounds of the wine. In processes that begin during fermentation and continue after bottling, these compounds bind together and aggregate. Eventually these particles reach a certain size where they are too large to stay suspended in the solution and precipitate out. The presence of visible sediment in a bottle will usually indicate a mature wine. The resulting wine, with this loss of tannins and pigment, will have a paler color and taste softer, less astringent. The sediment, while harmless, can have an unpleasant taste and is often separated from the wine by decanting.[5]

During the aging process, the perception of a wine's acidity may change even though the total measurable amount of acidity is more or less constant throughout a wine's life. This is due to the esterification of the acids, combining with alcohols in complex array to form esters. In addition to making a wine taste less acidic, these esters introduce a range of possible aromas. Eventually the wine may age to a point where other components of the wine (such as a tannins and fruit) are less noticeable themselves, which will then bring back a heightened perception of wine acidity. Other chemical processes that occur during aging include the hydrolysis of flavor precursors which detach themselves from glucose molecules and introduce new flavor notes in the older wine and aldehydes become oxidized. The interaction of certain phenolics develop what is known as tertiary aromas which are different from the primary aromas that are derived from the grape and during fermentation.[2][4]

As a wine starts to mature, its bouquet will become more developed and multi-layered. While a taster may be able to pick out a few fruit notes in a young wine, a more complex wine will have several distinct fruit, floral, earthy, mineral and oak derived notes. The lingering finish of a wine will lengthen. Eventually the wine will reach a point of maturity, when it is said to be at its "peak". This is the point when the wine has the maximum amount of complexity, most pleasing mouthfeel and softening of tannins and has not yet started to decay. When this point will occur is not yet predictable and can vary from bottle to bottle. If a wine is aged for too long, it will start to descend into decrepitude where the fruit tastes hollow and weak while the wine's acidity becomes dominant.[4]

The natural esterification that takes place in wines and other alcoholic beverages during the aging process is an example of acid-catalysed esterification. Over time, the acidity of the acetic acid and tannins in an aging wine will catalytically protonate other organic acids (including acetic acid itself), encouraging ethanol to react as a nucleophile. As a result, ethyl acetate the ester of ethanol and acetic acidis the most abundant ester in wines. Other combinations of organic alcohols (such as phenol-containing compounds) and organic acids lead to a variety of different esters in wines, contributing to their different flavours, smells and tastes. Of course, when compared to sulfuric acid conditions, the acid conditions in a wine are mild, so yield is low (often in tenths or hundredths of a percentage point by volume) and take years for ester to accumulate.[1]

Coates Law of Maturity is a principle used in wine tasting relating to the aging ability of wine. Developed by the British Master of Wine, Clive Coates, the principle states that a wine will remain at its peak (or optimal) drinking quality for a duration of time that is equal to the time of maturation required to reach its optimal quality. During the evolution (aging) of a wine certain flavors, aromas and textures appear and fade. Rather than developing and fading in unison, these traits each operate on a unique evolutionary path and time line. The principle allows for the subjectivity of individual tastes because it follows the logic that positive traits that appeal to one particular wine taster will continue to persist along the principle's guideline while for another taster these traits might not be positive and therefore not applicable to the guideline. Wine expert Tom Stevenson has noted that there is logic in Coates' principle and that he has yet to encounter an anomaly or wine that debunks it.[13]

An example of the principle in practice would be a wine that someone acquires when it is 9 years of age, but finds it dull. A year later the drinker finds this wine very pleasing in texture, aroma and mouthfeel. Under the Coates Law of Maturity the wine will continue to be drunk at an optimal maturation for that drinker until it has reached 20 years of age at which time those positive traits that the drinker perceives will start to fade.[13]

There is a long history of using artificial means to try to accelerate the natural aging process. In Ancient Rome a smoke chamber known as a fumarium was used to enhance the flavor of wine through artificial aging. Amphorae were placed in the chamber, which was built on top of a heated hearth, in order to impart a smoky flavor in the wine that also seemed to sharpen the acidity. The wine would sometimes come out of the fumarium with a paler color just like aged wine.[14] Modern winemaking techniques like micro-oxygenation can have the side effect of artificially aging the wine. In the production of Madeira and rancio wines, the wines are deliberately exposed to excessive temperatures to accelerate the maturation of the wine. Other techniques used to artificially age wine (with inconclusive results on their effectiveness) include shaking the wine, exposing it to radiation, magnetism or ultra-sonic waves.[4] More recently, experiments with artificial aging through high-voltage electricity have produced results above the remaining techniques, as assessed by a panel of wine tasters.[15] Other artificial wine-aging gadgets include the "Clef du Vin", which is a metallic object that is dipped into wine and purportedly ages the wine one year for every second of dipping. The product has received mixed reviews from wine commentators.[16]

The rest is here:
Aging of wine - Wikipedia

Read More...

Why I Hope to Die at 75 – The Atlantic

Saturday, November 12th, 2016

Seventy-five.

Thats how long I want to live: 75 years.

This preference drives my daughters crazy. It drives my brothers crazy. My loving friends think I am crazy. They think that I cant mean what I say; that I havent thought clearly about this, because there is so much in the world to see and do. To convince me of my errors, they enumerate the myriad people I know who are over 75 and doing quite well. They are certain that as I get closer to 75, I will push the desired age back to 80, then 85, maybe even 90.

I am sure of my position. Doubtless, death is a loss. It deprives us of experiences and milestones, of time spent with our spouse and children. In short, it deprives us of all the things we value.

But here is a simple truth that many of us seem to resist: living too long is also a loss. It renders many of us, if not disabled, then faltering and declining, a state that may not be worse than death but is nonetheless deprived. It robs us of our creativity and ability to contribute to work, society, the world. It transforms how people experience us, relate to us, and, most important, remember us. We are no longer remembered as vibrant and engaged but as feeble, ineffectual, even pathetic.

By the time I reach 75, I will have lived a complete life. I will have loved and been loved. My children will be grown and in the midst of their own rich lives. I will have seen my grandchildren born and beginning their lives. I will have pursued my lifes projects and made whatever contributions, important or not, I am going to make. And hopefully, I will not have too many mental and physical limitations. Dying at 75 will not be a tragedy. Indeed, I plan to have my memorial service before I die. And I dont want any crying or wailing, but a warm gathering filled with fun reminiscences, stories of my awkwardness, and celebrations of a good life. After I die, my survivors can have their own memorial service if they wantthat is not my business.

Let me be clear about my wish. Im neither asking for more time than is likely nor foreshortening my life. Today I am, as far as my physician and I know, very healthy, with no chronic illness. I just climbed Kilimanjaro with two of my nephews. So I am not talking about bargaining with God to live to 75 because I have a terminal illness. Nor am I talking about waking up one morning 18 years from now and ending my life through euthanasia or suicide. Since the 1990s, I have actively opposed legalizing euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. People who want to die in one of these ways tend to suffer not from unremitting pain but from depression, hopelessness, and fear of losing their dignity and control. The people they leave behind inevitably feel they have somehow failed. The answer to these symptoms is not ending a life but getting help. I have long argued that we should focus on giving all terminally ill people a good, compassionate deathnot euthanasia or assisted suicide for a tiny minority.

I am talking about how long I want to live and the kind and amount of health care I will consent to after 75. Americans seem to be obsessed with exercising, doing mental puzzles, consuming various juice and protein concoctions, sticking to strict diets, and popping vitamins and supplements, all in a valiant effort to cheat death and prolong life as long as possible. This has become so pervasive that it now defines a cultural type: what I call the American immortal.

I reject this aspiration. I think this manic desperation to endlessly extend life is misguided and potentially destructive. For many reasons, 75 is a pretty good age to aim to stop.

What are those reasons? Lets begin with demography. We are growing old, and our older years are not of high quality. Since the mid-19th century, Americans have been living longer. In 1900, the life expectancy of an average American at birth was approximately 47 years. By 1930, it was 59.7; by 1960, 69.7; by 1990, 75.4. Today, a newborn can expect to live about 79 years. (On average, women live longer than men. In the United States, the gap is about five years. According to the National Vital Statistics Report, life expectancy for American males born in 2011 is 76.3, and for females it is 81.1.)

In the early part of the 20th century, life expectancy increased as vaccines, antibiotics, and better medical care saved more children from premature death and effectively treated infections. Once cured, people who had been sick largely returned to their normal, healthy lives without residual disabilities. Since 1960, however, increases in longevity have been achieved mainly by extending the lives of people over 60. Rather than saving more young people, we are stretching out old age.

The American immortal desperately wants to believe in the compression of morbidity. Developed in 1980 by James F. Fries, now a professor emeritus of medicine at Stanford, this theory postulates that as we extend our life spans into the 80s and 90s, we will be living healthier livesmore time before we have disabilities, and fewer disabilities overall. The claim is that with longer life, an ever smaller proportion of our lives will be spent in a state of decline.

Compression of morbidity is a quintessentially American idea. It tells us exactly what we want to believe: that we will live longer lives and then abruptly die with hardly any aches, pains, or physical deteriorationthe morbidity traditionally associated with growing old. It promises a kind of fountain of youth until the ever-receding time of death. It is this dreamor fantasythat drives the American immortal and has fueled interest and investment in regenerative medicine and replacement organs.

But as life has gotten longer, has it gotten healthier? Is 70 the new 50?

Not quite. It is true that compared with their counterparts 50 years ago, seniors today are less disabled and more mobile. But over recent decades, increases in longevity seem to have been accompanied by increases in disabilitynot decreases. For instance, using data from the National Health Interview Survey, Eileen Crimmins, a researcher at the University of Southern California, and a colleague assessed physical functioning in adults, analyzing whether people could walk a quarter of a mile; climb 10 stairs; stand or sit for two hours; and stand up, bend, or kneel without using special equipment. The results show that as people age, there is a progressive erosion of physical functioning. More important, Crimmins found that between 1998 and 2006, the loss of functional mobility in the elderly increased. In 1998, about 28 percent of American men 80 and older had a functional limitation; by 2006, that figure was nearly 42 percent. And for women the result was even worse: more than half of women 80 and older had a functional limitation. Crimminss conclusion: There was an increase in the life expectancy with disease and a decrease in the years without disease. The same is true for functioning loss, an increase in expected years unable to function.

This was confirmed by a recent worldwide assessment of healthy life expectancy conducted by the Harvard School of Public Health and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington. The researchers included not just physical but also mental disabilities such as depression and dementia. They found not a compression of morbidity but in fact an expansionan increase in the absolute number of years lost to disability as life expectancy rises.

How can this be? My father illustrates the situation well. About a decade ago, just shy of his 77th birthday, he began having pain in his abdomen. Like every good doctor, he kept denying that it was anything important. But after three weeks with no improvement, he was persuaded to see his physician. He had in fact had a heart attack, which led to a cardiac catheterization and ultimately a bypass. Since then, he has not been the same. Once the prototype of a hyperactive Emanuel, suddenly his walking, his talking, his humor got slower. Today he can swim, read the newspaper, needle his kids on the phone, and still live with my mother in their own house. But everything seems sluggish. Although he didnt die from the heart attack, no one would say he is living a vibrant life. When he discussed it with me, my father said, I have slowed down tremendously. That is a fact. I no longer make rounds at the hospital or teach. Despite this, he also said he was happy.

As Crimmins puts it, over the past 50 years, health care hasnt slowed the aging process so much as it has slowed the dying process. And, as my father demonstrates, the contemporary dying process has been elongated. Death usually results from the complications of chronic illnessheart disease, cancer, emphysema, stroke, Alzheimers, diabetes.

Take the example of stroke. The good news is that we have made major strides in reducing mortality from strokes. Between 2000 and 2010, the number of deaths from stroke declined by more than 20 percent. The bad news is that many of the roughly 6.8 million Americans who have survived a stroke suffer from paralysis or an inability to speak. And many of the estimated 13 million more Americans who have survived a silent stroke suffer from more-subtle brain dysfunction such as aberrations in thought processes, mood regulation, and cognitive functioning. Worse, it is projected that over the next 15 years there will be a 50 percent increase in the number of Americans suffering from stroke-induced disabilities. Unfortunately, the same phenomenon is repeated with many other diseases.

So American immortals may live longer than their parents, but they are likely to be more incapacitated. Does that sound very desirable? Not to me.

The situation becomes of even greater concern when we confront the most dreadful of all possibilities: living with dementia and other acquired mental disabilities. Right now approximately 5 million Americans over 65 have Alzheimers; one in three Americans 85 and older has Alzheimers. And the prospect of that changing in the next few decades is not good. Numerous recent trials of drugs that were supposed to stall Alzheimersmuch less reverse or prevent ithave failed so miserably that researchers are rethinking the whole disease paradigm that informed much of the research over the past few decades. Instead of predicting a cure in the foreseeable future, many are warning of a tsunami of dementiaa nearly 300 percent increase in the number of older Americans with dementia by 2050.

Half of people 80 and older with functional limitations. A third of people 85 and older with Alzheimers. That still leaves many, many elderly people who have escaped physical and mental disability. If we are among the lucky ones, then why stop at 75? Why not live as long as possible?

Even if we arent demented, our mental functioning deteriorates as we grow older. Age-associated declines in mental-processing speed, working and long-term memory, and problem-solving are well established. Conversely, distractibility increases. We cannot focus and stay with a project as well as we could when we were young. As we move slower with age, we also think slower.

It is not just mental slowing. We literally lose our creativity. About a decade ago, I began working with a prominent health economist who was about to turn 80. Our collaboration was incredibly productive. We published numerous papers that influenced the evolving debates around health-care reform. My colleague is brilliant and continues to be a major contributor, and he celebrated his 90th birthday this year. But he is an outliera very rare individual.

American immortals operate on the assumption that they will be precisely such outliers. But the fact is that by 75, creativity, originality, and productivity are pretty much gone for the vast, vast majority of us. Einstein famously said, A person who has not made his great contribution to science before the age of 30 will never do so. He was extreme in his assessment. And wrong. Dean Keith Simonton, at the University of California at Davis, a luminary among researchers on age and creativity, synthesized numerous studies to demonstrate a typical age-creativity curve: creativity rises rapidly as a career commences, peaks about 20 years into the career, at about age 40 or 45, and then enters a slow, age-related decline. There are some, but not huge, variations among disciplines. Currently, the average age at which Nobel Prizewinning physicists make their discoverynot get the prizeis 48. Theoretical chemists and physicists make their major contribution slightly earlier than empirical researchers do. Similarly, poets tend to peak earlier than novelists do. Simontons own study of classical composers shows that the typical composer writes his first major work at age 26, peaks at about age 40 with both his best work and maximum output, and then declines, writing his last significant musical composition at 52. (All the composers studied were male.)

This age-creativity relationship is a statistical association, the product of averages; individuals vary from this trajectory. Indeed, everyone in a creative profession thinks they will be, like my collaborator, in the long tail of the curve. There are late bloomers. As my friends who enumerate them do, we hold on to them for hope. It is true, people can continue to be productive past 75to write and publish, to draw, carve, and sculpt, to compose. But there is no getting around the data. By definition, few of us can be exceptions. Moreover, we need to ask how much of what Old Thinkers, as Harvey C. Lehman called them in his 1953 Age and Achievement, produce is novel rather than reiterative and repetitive of previous ideas. The age-creativity curveespecially the declineendures across cultures and throughout history, suggesting some deep underlying biological determinism probably related to brain plasticity.

We can only speculate about the biology. The connections between neurons are subject to an intense process of natural selection. The neural connections that are most heavily used are reinforced and retained, while those that are rarely, if ever, used atrophy and disappear over time. Although brain plasticity persists throughout life, we do not get totally rewired. As we age, we forge a very extensive network of connections established through a lifetime of experiences, thoughts, feelings, actions, and memories. We are subject to who we have been. It is difficult, if not impossible, to generate new, creative thoughts, because we dont develop a new set of neural connections that can supersede the existing network. It is much more difficult for older people to learn new languages. All of those mental puzzles are an effort to slow the erosion of the neural connections we have. Once you squeeze the creativity out of the neural networks established over your initial career, they are not likely to develop strong new brain connections to generate innovative ideasexcept maybe in those Old Thinkers like my outlier colleague, who happen to be in the minority endowed with superior plasticity.

Maybe mental functionsprocessing, memory, problem-solvingslow at 75. Maybe creating something novel is very rare after that age. But isnt this a peculiar obsession? Isnt there more to life than being totally physically fit and continuing to add to ones creative legacy?

One university professor told me that as he has aged (he is 70) he has published less frequently, but he now contributes in other ways. He mentors students, helping them translate their passions into research projects and advising them on the balance of career and family. And people in other fields can do the same: mentor the next generation.

Mentorship is hugely important. It lets us transmit our collective memory and draw on the wisdom of elders. It is too often undervalued, dismissed as a way to occupy seniors who refuse to retire and who keep repeating the same stories. But it also illuminates a key issue with aging: the constricting of our ambitions and expectations.

We accommodate our physical and mental limitations. Our expectations shrink. Aware of our diminishing capacities, we choose ever more restricted activities and projects, to ensure we can fulfill them. Indeed, this constriction happens almost imperceptibly. Over time, and without our conscious choice, we transform our lives. We dont notice that we are aspiring to and doing less and less. And so we remain content, but the canvas is now tiny. The American immortal, once a vital figure in his or her profession and community, is happy to cultivate avocational interests, to take up bird watching, bicycle riding, pottery, and the like. And then, as walking becomes harder and the pain of arthritis limits the fingers mobility, life comes to center around sitting in the den reading or listening to books on tape and doing crossword puzzles. And then

Maybe this is too dismissive. There is more to life than youthful passions focused on career and creating. There is posterity: children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren.

But here, too, living as long as possible has drawbacks we often wont admit to ourselves. I will leave aside the very real and oppressive financial and caregiving burdens that many, if not most, adults in the so-called sandwich generation are now experiencing, caught between the care of children and parents. Our living too long places real emotional weights on our progeny.

Unless there has been terrible abuse, no child wants his or her parents to die. It is a huge loss at any age. It creates a tremendous, unfillable hole. But parents also cast a big shadow for most children. Whether estranged, disengaged, or deeply loving, they set expectations, render judgments, impose their opinions, interfere, and are generally a looming presence for even adult children. This can be wonderful. It can be annoying. It can be destructive. But it is inescapable as long as the parent is alive. Examples abound in life and literature: Lear, the quintessential Jewish mother, the Tiger Mom. And while children can never fully escape this weight even after a parent dies, there is much less pressure to conform to parental expectations and demands after they are gone.

Living parents also occupy the role of head of the family. They make it hard for grown children to become the patriarch or matriarch. When parents routinely live to 95, children must caretake into their own retirement. That doesnt leave them much time on their ownand it is all old age. When parents live to 75, children have had the joys of a rich relationship with their parents, but also have enough time for their own lives, out of their parents shadows.

But there is something even more important than parental shadowing: memories. How do we want to be remembered by our children and grandchildren? We wish our children to remember us in our prime. Active, vigorous, engaged, animated, astute, enthusiastic, funny, warm, loving. Not stooped and sluggish, forgetful and repetitive, constantly asking What did she say? We want to be remembered as independent, not experienced as burdens.

At age 75 we reach that unique, albeit somewhat arbitrarily chosen, moment when we have lived a rich and complete life, and have hopefully imparted the right memories to our children. Living the American immortals dream dramatically increases the chances that we will not get our wishthat memories of vitality will be crowded out by the agonies of decline. Yes, with effort our children will be able to recall that great family vacation, that funny scene at Thanksgiving, that embarrassing faux pas at a wedding. But the most-recent yearsthe years with progressing disabilities and the need to make caregiving arrangementswill inevitably become the predominant and salient memories. The old joys have to be actively conjured up.

Of course, our children wont admit it. They love us and fear the loss that will be created by our death. And a loss it will be. A huge loss. They dont want to confront our mortality, and they certainly dont want to wish for our death. But even if we manage not to become burdens to them, our shadowing them until their old age is also a loss. And leaving themand our grandchildrenwith memories framed not by our vivacity but by our frailty is the ultimate tragedy.

Seventy-five. That is all I want to live. But if I am not going to engage in euthanasia or suicide, and I wont, is this all just idle chatter? Dont I lack the courage of my convictions?

No. My view does have important practical implications. One is personal and two involve policy.

Once I have lived to 75, my approach to my health care will completely change. I wont actively end my life. But I wont try to prolong it, either. Today, when the doctor recommends a test or treatment, especially one that will extend our lives, it becomes incumbent upon us to give a good reason why we dont want it. The momentum of medicine and family means we will almost invariably get it.

My attitude flips this default on its head. I take guidance from what Sir William Osler wrote in his classic turn-of-the-century medical textbook, The Principles and Practice of Medicine: Pneumonia may well be called the friend of the aged. Taken off by it in an acute, short, not often painful illness, the old man escapes those cold gradations of decay so distressing to himself and to his friends.

My Osler-inspired philosophy is this: At 75 and beyond, I will need a good reason to even visit the doctor and take any medical test or treatment, no matter how routine and painless. And that good reason is not It will prolong your life. I will stop getting any regular preventive tests, screenings, or interventions. I will accept only palliativenot curativetreatments if I am suffering pain or other disability.

This means colonoscopies and other cancer-screening tests are outand before 75. If I were diagnosed with cancer now, at 57, I would probably be treated, unless the prognosis was very poor. But 65 will be my last colonoscopy. No screening for prostate cancer at any age. (When a urologist gave me a PSA test even after I said I wasnt interested and called me with the results, I hung up before he could tell me. He ordered the test for himself, I told him, not for me.) After 75, if I develop cancer, I will refuse treatment. Similarly, no cardiac stress test. No pacemaker and certainly no implantable defibrillator. No heart-valve replacement or bypass surgery. If I develop emphysema or some similar disease that involves frequent exacerbations that would, normally, land me in the hospital, I will accept treatment to ameliorate the discomfort caused by the feeling of suffocation, but will refuse to be hauled off.

What about simple stuff? Flu shots are out. Certainly if there were to be a flu pandemic, a younger person who has yet to live a complete life ought to get the vaccine or any antiviral drugs. A big challenge is antibiotics for pneumonia or skin and urinary infections. Antibiotics are cheap and largely effective in curing infections. It is really hard for us to say no. Indeed, even people who are sure they dont want life-extending treatments find it hard to refuse antibiotics. But, as Osler reminds us, unlike the decays associated with chronic conditions, death from these infections is quick and relatively painless. So, no to antibiotics.

Obviously, a do-not-resuscitate order and a complete advance directive indicating no ventilators, dialysis, surgery, antibiotics, or any other medicationnothing except palliative care even if I am conscious but not mentally competenthave been written and recorded. In short, no life-sustaining interventions. I will die when whatever comes first takes me.

As for the two policy implications, one relates to using life expectancy as a measure of the quality of health care. Japan has the third-highest life expectancy, at 84.4 years (behind Monaco and Macau), while the United States is a disappointing No. 42, at 79.5 years. But we should not care about catching up withor measure ourselves againstJapan. Once a country has a life expectancy past 75 for both men and women, this measure should be ignored. (The one exception is increasing the life expectancy of some subgroups, such as black males, who have a life expectancy of just 72.1 years. That is dreadful, and should be a major focus of attention.) Instead, we should look much more carefully at childrens health measures, where the U.S. lags, and shamefully: in preterm deliveries before 37 weeks (currently one in eight U.S. births), which are correlated with poor outcomes in vision, with cerebral palsy, and with various problems related to brain development; in infant mortality (the U.S. is at 6.17 infant deaths per 1,000 live births, while Japan is at 2.13 and Norway is at 2.48); and in adolescent mortality (where the U.S. has an appalling recordat the bottom among high-income countries).

A second policy implication relates to biomedical research. We need more research on Alzheimers, the growing disabilities of old age, and chronic conditionsnot on prolonging the dying process.

Many people, especially those sympathetic to the American immortal, will recoil and reject my view. They will think of every exception, as if these prove that the central theory is wrong. Like my friends, they will think me crazy, posturingor worse. They might condemn me as being against the elderly.

Again, let me be clear: I am not saying that those who want to live as long as possible are unethical or wrong. I am certainly not scorning or dismissing people who want to live on despite their physical and mental limitations. Im not even trying to convince anyone Im right. Indeed, I often advise people in this age group on how to get the best medical care available in the United States for their ailments. That is their choice, and I want to support them.

And I am not advocating 75 as the official statistic of a complete, good life in order to save resources, ration health care, or address public-policy issues arising from the increases in life expectancy. What I am trying to do is delineate my views for a good life and make my friends and others think about how they want to live as they grow older. I want them to think of an alternative to succumbing to that slow constriction of activities and aspirations imperceptibly imposed by aging. Are we to embrace the American immortal or my 75 and no more view?

I think the rejection of my view is literally natural. After all, evolution has inculcated in us a drive to live as long as possible. We are programmed to struggle to survive. Consequently, most people feel there is something vaguely wrong with saying 75 and no more. We are eternally optimistic Americans who chafe at limits, especially limits imposed on our own lives. We are sure we are exceptional.

I also think my view conjures up spiritual and existential reasons for people to scorn and reject it. Many of us have suppressed, actively or passively, thinking about God, heaven and hell, and whether we return to the worms. We are agnostics or atheists, or just dont think about whether there is a God and why she should care at all about mere mortals. We also avoid constantly thinking about the purpose of our lives and the mark we will leave. Is making money, chasing the dream, all worth it? Indeed, most of us have found a way to live our lives comfortably without acknowledging, much less answering, these big questions on a regular basis. We have gotten into a productive routine that helps us ignore them. And I dont purport to have the answers.

But 75 defines a clear point in time: for me, 2032. It removes the fuzziness of trying to live as long as possible. Its specificity forces us to think about the end of our lives and engage with the deepest existential questions and ponder what we want to leave our children and grandchildren, our community, our fellow Americans, the world. The deadline also forces each of us to ask whether our consumption is worth our contribution. As most of us learned in college during late-night bull sessions, these questions foster deep anxiety and discomfort. The specificity of 75 means we can no longer just continue to ignore them and maintain our easy, socially acceptable agnosticism. For me, 18 more years with which to wade through these questions is preferable to years of trying to hang on to every additional day and forget the psychic pain they bring up, while enduring the physical pain of an elongated dying process.

Seventy-five years is all I want to live. I want to celebrate my life while I am still in my prime. My daughters and dear friends will continue to try to convince me that I am wrong and can live a valuable life much longer. And I retain the right to change my mind and offer a vigorous and reasoned defense of living as long as possible. That, after all, would mean still being creative after 75.

Go here to read the rest:
Why I Hope to Die at 75 - The Atlantic

Read More...

Page 44«..1020..43444546..»


2024 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick